Trump Hates Being In Afghanistan, But Admin Is Mum On What His Policy Will Be – The Daily Caller

George W. Bush invaded Afghanistan, then BarackObamafailed to completely pull out American troops, and now soldiers are dying on President Trumps watch as the U.S. continues to be engaged in a 16-year war with no end in sight.

While President Trump continues to lambaste American involvement in the Middle East frequently saying the U.S. got nothing for the conflicts the president, his aides, or the Defense Department have yet to lay out a strategy for the Afghan war.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked repeatedly Thursday if the administration will deploy more troops to Afghanistan, an ideabackedby the top U.S. commander in the region. She referred reporters to the Defense Department as Trump has delegated troop level authority to Defense Secretary James Mattis.

Defense Department spokesmanAdam Stump told The Daily Caller, No decisions have been made.

There are roughly 8,500 American troops in Afghanistan and President Trump gave Mattis the authority to deploy 3,000 more, according to a Washington Postreport. Mattis has yet to deploy these troops, although a former intelligence adviser who worked with both Mattis and McMaster told TheDC in April that additional soldiers are needed to win the war in Afghanistan.

The only way to effectively win in Afghanistan is not announce a withdrawal and find a way to stay, Michael Pregent, now an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute,said.

However, it would be quite the departure from Trumps rhetoric for his administration to send more troops to Afghanistan and to have them stay there for a while. The president had a luncheon with service members on Monday, and there Trump said, Weve been there for now close to 17 years, and I want to find out why weve been there for 17 years, how its going, and what we should do in terms of additional ideas.

TheDC askedSanders that same day if Trump would support a long-term deployment of troops in Afghanistan, and the spokeswoman replied: The president is still reviewing what options he wants to take and what decisions hell make, and well keep you guys posted when we have an announcement on that.

There is also another option for how to deal with the situation in Afghanistan that is supported by White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and senior adviser Jared Kushner, according to a report fromThe American Conservative.The plan the two reportedly are supportive of is using mercenaries to train the Afghan military and battle the resurgent Taliban.

Eric Prince, founder of the infamous private military company Blackwater (now known as Academi), described this plan to Big League Politics in an interview as a way for America to get on the off ramp in the conflict.

The US military has spent 16 years and a trillion dollars and they werent able to put the fire out. At bare minimum, this is a much cheaper way to proceed. Even if you ignore effect, you have a significant cost savings $40 billion plus, Prince said.

Cost savings is something President Trump has continued to bring up. He said in a recentinterviewthat its ridiculous that it is more difficult for him to ask Congress for funds to rebuild infrastructure in America than it is to get trillions to fund war in the Middle East.

Whatever ends up happening will be a decision that rests on Trumps shoulders even if he delegated troop authority to Mattis. He delegated not one bit of the strategy by the way. Not one bit. That is his and his alone, the defense secretarytoldreporters Friday.

View original post here:
Trump Hates Being In Afghanistan, But Admin Is Mum On What His Policy Will Be - The Daily Caller

Related Posts

Comments are closed.