Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Welcoming the progress made by UNAMA in Afghanistan – GOV.UK

Thank you very much, Madam President. And thank you to the Special Representative and Ms Khurram for their really helpful briefings and nice to see Ms Khurram here again. And thank you to my colleague, the Afghan Ambassador. Were very pleased to be part of the Group of Friends of Women in Afghanistan and its very heartening to hear so much support from colleagues around the table. So thank you very much for that. And also, big thank you to the Indonesian Foreign Minister for her guidance as well.

First of all, I think for the Special Representative, its a huge thank you once again for what youre doing and for the work of UNAMA in incredibly challenging circumstances. So thank you for that. And Id like to come on in a minute to the three main issues of today: the peace process, the elections and economic development.

But at first, I just wanted to add the United Kingdoms voice to all those condemning the attack on the UN vehicle in Kabul last month and the recent attack that killed Dr. Nakamura. We join all those who lament the loss of these fine colleagues. We send our sympathies and our condolences to their families and to all those who knew them. There is absolutely no justification for these disgraceful acts of violence. The Taliban claim to speak for the people of Afghanistan and yet if they do not take part directly in such attacks, they certainly create an environment where such attacks become possible. And in that connection, I would like to mention the Taliban attack on Bagram last Tuesday, which killed two civilians and injured many more. And the United Kingdom calls on the Taliban to end such attacks in order to give Afghans a chance for the stable and just peace that they so much deserve.

Turning to the peace process, we share the view of other members that only a political process can deliver a lasting and just peace. And a deal between the US and Taliban is crucial to unlocking intra-Afghan talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban. The United Kingdom also hopes talks can resume soon, but its clear the Taliban need to firmly commit to a concrete reduction in violence as a matter of urgency. The Taliban needs to show its serious about peace, the Afghan people need respite from the awful violence, and we need to create a conducive environment for these crucial intra-Afghan talks to succeed.

Madam President, Ive mentioned the vital role that women have to play in the peace process and I join my colleagues in once again underscoring that. I wanted to commend you now on the opening of the Nationwide Global Open Days on women, peace and security with the symposium in Kabul in October.

My second point concerns the Afghan presidential elections. Madam President, we join others in calling on all stakeholders to respect and uphold the integrity of the electoral management bodies as they work to complete the process and deliver the results in a timely manner.

We welcome UNAMAs continued engagement around the elections with national and international partners. And we likewise support UNAMAs call for transparency, impartiality and independence as the results of process. It was good to see that the Independent Electoral Commission will be able to move forward with recounts in the remaining provinces. We hope this process can move forward expeditiously and transparently and we look forward to preliminary results.

My last point, Madam President, is on Afghanistans economic development needs, regardless of what happens in the months ahead. Afghanistan will continue to have considerable economic development and humanitarian needs, as the Indonesian representative so clearly set out. Financial commitments made at the Brussels Summit in 2016 will run out next year. The UK supports the holding of a pledging conference in 2020 to address the financing gap and identify development priorities for the remainder of the transformation decade. And we therefore welcome, Madam President, the work that UNAMA is doing with the Afghan government in preparation for the 2020 Ministerial Conference on Afghanistan and the initiation of discussions with potential hosts for that event.

Thank you.

Read the original post:
Welcoming the progress made by UNAMA in Afghanistan - GOV.UK

There are lies, damn lies, and even more damn lies about Afghanistan – Task & Purpose

Since the Washington Post first published the "Afghanistan papers," I have been reminded of a scene from "Apocalypse Now Redux" in which Army Col. Walter Kurtz reads to the soldier assigned to kill him two Time magazine articles showing how the American people had been lied to about Vietnam by both the Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon administrations.

In one of the articles, a British counterinsurgency expert tells Nixon that "things felt much better and smelled much better" during his visit to Vietnam.

"How do they smell to you, soldier?" Kurtz asks.

The Washington Post's reporting reveals that top government officials have known for years that the Afghanistan war has been unwinnable, yet they have continued to support it in public, going so far as to twist statistics to make things appear to be better than they really were.

The stories confirm that the U.S. military's strategy has been to "muddle along" and continue to send troops to fight a conflict that cannot be won on the battlefield.

Yet rather than owning up to the truth, several prominent supporters of the Afghan war, who have invested their reputations in its outcome, have instead attacked the Washington Post.

Michael E. O'Hanlon, of the left-leaning Brookings Institution think tank in Washington, accused the Post of doing a "disservice" by reporting that U.S. officials have been less than forthright about the prospects of success in Afghanistan.

"It is wrong badly wrong to claim to have proven that the Bush, Obama, and/or Trump administrations, as well as top military and diplomatic leaders charged with the Afghanistan mission, systematically and intentionally misled the country about what was going on," O'Hanlon wrote in a Dec. 10 post for the Brookings Institution's blog.

Oh really? Let's play a fun game and count the number of times defense officials have claimed that Afghanistan has turned the corner.

This is what then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said during his December 2011 visit to Afghanistan: "I think 2011 will go down as a turning point here in Afghanistan. We've weakened the Taliban. We've been able to secure more areas here in Afghanistan. The Afghan army is asserting itself, becoming more operational. We're transitioning areas. Over 50 percent of the population has now been transitioned to areas of Afghan governance and security."

In May 2014, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called Afghanistan's elections a "turning point in the confidence" of Afghan security forces.

And Army Gen. John Nicholson, who led all U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, said this during a November 2017 Pentagon news briefing: "Now, looking ahead to 2018, as President Ghani said, he believes we have turned the corner and I agree. The momentum is now with the Afghan Security Forces and the Taliban cannot win in the face of the pressures that I outlined. Again, their choices are to reconcile, live in irrelevance, or die."

As Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pointed out during the June 2018 confirmation hearing for the current U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, "We've supposedly turned the corner so many times that it seems now we're going in circles."

But others insist that the Afghanistan war is still worth fighting, citing the good the United States has accomplished there, such as advances in education.

Ryan Crocker, who served as charg d'affaires to Afghanistan in 2002 and later as the U.S. ambassador from 2011 to 2012, wrote in the Washington Post that only 900,000 children were in school all of whom were boys when the U.S. military initially toppled the Taliban government.

"When I left Afghanistan as ambassador in 2012, 8 million Afghan kids were in school, a third of them girls," Crocker wrote. "Does that sound like a disaster?"

However, it is still extremely difficult to be a woman in Afghanistan, especially outside of Kabul and Jalalabad, said John F. Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.

"Go out into the hinterlands," Sopko told reporters in April. "Women are still treated very poorly, and we have to remember that."

Still, it is impossible to argue that life would improve for Afghans if the United States withdrew all of its troops from the country.

Former Defense Secretary James Mattis, who also led troops in Afghanistan, noted that Afghan security forces continue to fight the Taliban even though more than 28,500 of their troops and police have been killed since 2015.

"Why is that army still fighting having suffered that many casualties if the whole thing is just a waste and it can't be successful?" Mattis told David Ignatius of the Washington Post. "You couldn't fight many armies that could take those casualties and stay in the brawl."

Mattis also said he was perplexed at the notion that the U.S. government tried to hide how bad the situation in Afghanistan really was.

"I have walked the ground with your reporters beside me, who were embedded in the units, who were watching this close up," Mattis said. "The reporting, I thought, was pretty accurate."

True, but those embeds ended several years ago and Army Gen. Austin Miller, who has led all U.S. troops in Afghanistan for more than a year, has not held a single Pentagon press briefing.

The U.S. military has also stopped making public how much territory the Afghan government actually controls and other metrics for success have become classified, Sopko said in April.

"Embarrassing things tend to get classified in this town," Sopko said at a Defense Writers Group breakfast. "Governments don't usually classify good news. If they do by mistake, it's leaked."

All of this is a long way of answering the question posed by Col. Kurtz. How does the party line about Afghanistan smell? Like bullshit.

Not getting the Pentagon Run-Down? Sign up here!

Jeff Schogol covers the Pentagon for Task & Purpose. He has covered the military for 14 years and embedded with U.S. troops in Iraq and Haiti. Prior to joining T&P, he covered the Marine Corps and Air Force at Military Times. Comments or thoughts to share? Send them to Jeff Schogol via email at schogol@taskandpurpose.com or direct message @JeffSchogol on Twitter.

Read more here:
There are lies, damn lies, and even more damn lies about Afghanistan - Task & Purpose

The war on drugs in Afghanistan ‘has just been a total failure,’ the US’s top watchdog there says – INSIDER

The US-led war in Afghanistan turned 18 in October, and those two decades of fighting and rebuilding appear to have yielded little progress.

The counternarcotics effort there, for example, "has just been a total failure," John F. Sopko, special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said at the Wilson Center in Washington, DC, in November.

The US Drug Enforcement Administration has "done a yeoman's task there" and the special Afghan units they've trained have "made wonderful seizures," Sopko said. "The Afghans with the cooperation of the DEA have actually seized more drugs in Afghanistan than I believe we in the United States have seized on the Mexican border."

An Afghan man works on a poppy field in Jalalabad province, May 1, 2014. REUTERS/Parwiz

Nevertheless, "the amount seized over ... I think it's the last 10 years still is less than 5% of the crop that was grown last year 10 years of seizures, less than 5%. So you're never going to work your way out of that by just seizures alone," he said. "That's an area where we definitely have seen no improvement. If anything, I think we've probably gone back."

The Taliban banned opium in 2000, leaving many farmers destitute but causing drug production to hit a historic low in 2001, when the US invaded.

The invasion and collapse of governing institutions opened a vacuum that allowed cultivation to increase, leading to more robust counter-drug efforts by the US-led coalition.

UNODC Afghan opium survey 2018

Production leveled off in 2009 and 2010 but has steadily risen since 2011.

"From 2013 to 2016, drug production continued at or near the highest levels ever consistently seen in Afghanistan," according to a 2018 SIGAR report.

The most recent SIGAR quarterly report, released at the end of October, said the US has allotted about $8.94 billion to fight drugs in Afghanistan since 2002.

In 2018, opium cultivation covered 263,000 hectares in Afghanistan, according to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. That was down from 328,000 hectares in 2017 but still more than any other year since 1994.

SIGAR 45th Quarterly Report

While Afghanistan's opiate economy shrunk by two-thirds between 2017 and 2018, it was still 6% to 11% of the country's GDP and exceeded the value of the country's official legal exports of goods and services, according to SIGAR.

The broader problem of impunity also affects anti-drug efforts.

"We created a counternarcotics court to handle the narcotics issues," Sopko said. "They try a lot of people, but they try the poor slob who happens to be a the scene of the crime and not the big fish."

An Afghan child receives polio vaccination drops in Kabul, March 24, 2014. Mohammad Ismail/Reuters

Sopko said there had been progress on other development efforts, but each came with caveats.

"Education has improved, so our work in that area has helped. Whether all the money was spent wisely, I don't know," Sopko said. "The number of kids going to school has improved over time. How much we can say is related to US programs vs. the fact that other donors were involved, we can't tell."

"Healthcare has improved, particularly maternal healthcare ... that's mainly been in the major cities," he added.

"I think the military has improved overall, although it's hard to say how much, because our government no longer collects data on indica of improvements, which we find a little disconcerting," Sopko said. "For years they had different ways to rate the improvements in the military, and every time we went to audit, our military would change the goal posts, and after a while they just stopped collecting the data."

One of four A-29 Super Tucano aircraft given to the Afghan air force by the US at Hamid Karzai International Airport. Video by Staff Sgt. Robert Kingery/Released

Sopko said the Afghan air force and Afghan special forces have "improved dramatically" with US assistance. But US forces still appear to be doing most of the air transport and strikes on insurgents.

The Afghan military has also failed to train enough air controllers and liaisons, according to a Defense Department Inspector General report, which found that just 2.5% to 7.5% of airstrikes by Afghan aircraft involved tactical Afghan air controllers.

"We're always cautious when US government agencies claim dramatic increases due to their programs," Sopko said. "There's usually not a tie between them."

President Donald Trump with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani during Trump's surprise Thanksgiving Day visit, at Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan, November 28, 2019. Alex Brandon / AP

"Corruption, particularly in a country like Afghanistan, is a national security issue," Sopko said. "Because one of the best ways for the Taliban to recruit is to [tell Afghans to] look at all the corrupt government officials."

Sopko complimented the anti-corruption efforts of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and the country's chief executive, Abdullah Abdullah, but said there had been backsliding.

"It's hard for us to comprehend what it's like when you are the president or senior official and you appoint somebody as a minister, and even though that minister may be honest everybody in his chain of command is on the take," he added.

While the Afghan government is good at "checking boxes," he said, it falls short on other important measures like the number of indictments, the number of arrests, or the amount of money seized.

Sopko cited as an example the creation of a special anti-corruption force with dedicated police, prosecutors, and judges. At the US's suggestion, the Afghans polygraphed those officials but didn't remove those who failed. After some prompting, they removed the officials who failed but then didn't replace them.

Trump addresses US troops during his surprise Thanksgiving Day visit, at Bagram Air Field, November 28, 2019. Alex Brandon / AP

Asked about privatization and the role of contractors, Sopko chided the US Corps of Engineers, which he said has been "horrendous in not holding contractors' feet to the fire" for mistakes and other problems with their projects.

A particular problem with Afghan contractors has been companies that only exist on paper.

"We're currently investigating one company that does purchasing of gas for us," Sopko said. "Fuel is liquid gold, and over 50% of the fuel we buy for the Afghans is stolen or doesn't exist, and we're looking at one company and ... this individual has about 200 to 300 companies paper companies. So when we shut him down in this name, he opens up in another name, and we've had a big problem with that."

Sopko said his agency would urge the US and other donors not to focus on how much money was given to support reconstruction in Afghanistan but rather on where it goes and how it's used.

"If we don't, you might as well just pile up all of that money in Massoud Circle and burn it," he said.

More here:
The war on drugs in Afghanistan 'has just been a total failure,' the US's top watchdog there says - INSIDER

Losing Afghanistan: Why a Deal with the Taliban May Be Inevitable – SPIEGEL ONLINE

December 06, 201911:52 AM

It's a clear, warm autumn morning, and hundreds have gathered to pay their last respects to Najmullah, the revered commander of the militia in the village of Warduj, who fell in the battle against the Taliban. It is said that Najmullah never showed fear, that he always encouraged his men and that he loved trees more than anything else.

The imam recites the funeral prayer under an ancient walnut tree, the huge canopy breaking up the sunlight into shimmering dots. Najmullah's relatives then carry his body, wrapped in a green shroud, through the small town's Bazaar Street to the cemetery, a silent stream of people trailing behind.

With nine new graves having been added in the past two weeks alone, there aren't many plots left. The land here along the river is valuable, and there isn't much of it up here.

As the funeral procession turns into the cemetery, two groups of men come into view, hacking their way through the hardpacked soil, one pit on the left and another on the right. One is the grave for Commander Najmullah, while the other is reserved for the 16-year-old Taliban fighter Bahreddin, who died in the same battle the previous night. Only a handful of relatives have come to Bahreddin's funeral, and they are eyed with suspicion by the militiamen. Nevertheless, the imam recites the funeral prayer for him as well.

The nearly 50-year-old commander and the young Taliban fighter, whose beard hadn't even started growing yet, were both from the village of Chakaran. It is home to some 200 families, all of which are in some way related to each other -- but that didn't stop the two from killing each other. Only to be buried together -- one on the left with the pro-government fighters who have fallen, the other on the right with the Taliban dead. With only one graveyard in the valley, those are the rules. The men dig with determined haste, as the gravedigger of Warduj wanders back and forth, constantly reminding them: "Dig them narrow!" Space is precious, he kept reminding them, and more graves will be necessary.

Several men then hold impassioned speeches extoling Warduj's liberation after four years of Taliban rule. When asked how secure they consider the new order here to be, however, everyone just shakes their heads with concern. If it hadn't been for the American air raids at the beginning of the offensive, which eliminated four Taliban machine gun positions at the entrance to the valley within just a few minutes, the Islamists would not have been expelled. Nor would victory have been possible without the assistance of the Afghan special forces from Kabul, with their armored Humvees and radio equipment.

The liberation of Warduj is meant to be one of the rare success stories in a war in Afghanistan that has long felt endless, a testament to the fact that Afghanistan's multi-billion-dollar army is actually capable of victory. Proof that the government in Kabul and the entire state apparatus built up by the West after the swift invasion in 2001 isn't constantly retreating from the Taliban. And reassurance that the German soldiers who lost their lives not too far from here did not die in vain.

The day before, the head of the local police had set up two camping chairs on the front line so that his German visitors could sit more comfortably. He assured us that it wasn't dangerous, saying "the Taliban are much too busy running away from us." He tossed his curly mane as if to reinforce each and every word. But he, too, felt it safer to return to the provincial capital Faizabad before sunset and not stay in the narrow mountain valley, despite the fact that Afghan government forces have been fighting for weeks to recapture the area.

That night, the Taliban ambushed a nearby position and none of the five men stationed there survived. Commander Najmullah counted among the dead.

A Leaky Ship

Warduj is typical of the battle between the government and the Taliban, but not because it is going particularly well. The Taliban is capturing district after district, one swath of land after the next. They may be driven out for a time, but they return later. Indeed, Afghanistan is reminiscent of a leaky ship that will sink just as soon as the pumps are turned off.

Since the beginning of his presidency, United States President Donald Trump has repeatedly announced his intention to withdraw the American troops that have been stationed in Afghanistan for 18 years. For the past year, U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad has been negotiating with the Taliban in Qatar, though the Afghan government under President Ashraf Ghani has been excluded from those talks, a condition demanded by the Taliban. It is difficult to imagine a clearer message regarding expectations for the country's future leadership.

But in early September, Trump abruptly canceled a meeting scheduled with senior Taliban officials and members of the Afghan president's cabinet at Camp David near Washington. The concern was likely that holding such talks at the U.S. president's country retreat so close to the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks perpetrated by al-Qaida would not have looked good. "We were informed at short notice that we should prepare to travel," recalls Matin Bek, head of Afghanistan's Independent Directorate of Local Governance. "And the invitation was rescinded just as suddenly." Trump also took the further step of putting the entire negotiations on ice -- only to reverse himself last Thursday during a Thanksgiving visit to U.S. troops stationed in Afghanistan.

A Deadly Stalemate

So, what now? What comes next in a war that the U.S. was unable to win by 2011, despite having 100,000 soldiers in the country along with troops from around the world as part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)? The Taliban are also unable to emerge victorious, for as long as the Americans continue to finance Afghanistan's military and continue to conduct air strikes. It's a deadly stalemate.

The U.S. has become increasingly reliant on Afghan subcontractors and the more aggressive units they provide. The result? During the first six months of 2019, Afghan government forces killed more civilians than the Taliban and all other insurgency groups. Statistics provided by the United Nations show that they accounted for 52 percent of the close to 1,400 deaths.

To secure a more solid governing mandate and prevent the U.S. from ever again holding negotiations without him, President Ghani pushed through elections on Sept. 28. But as happened in the last presidential election in 2014, Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah, who came in second place, once again exchanged a litany of accusations of electoral fraud. Both declared themselves the winner, and the political disaster was consummated. On Oct. 27, the country's national electoral commission said it would soon be able to present initial results. Only 19 percent of registered voters went to the polls, less than 5 percent of the population. The Taliban, it has become apparent, no longer needs to conduct attacks to make an election seem pointless.

A Lack of Determination

Every Western government that has contributed troops and vast sums of money to the effort to secure Afghanistan is justifiably wary of admitting that it has all been in vain. The U.S. plan envisioned bringing the Taliban and the Afghan government together for negotiations once Washington reached a deal with the Taliban. But the U.S. also intended to withdraw most of its remaining 14,000 soldiers from the country, which would have completely robbed Kabul of leverage in those talks.

Still, everyone is talking about negotiations and the need to end the war: both the leaders in Kabul and the government's protectors abroad. But nobody has come up with a concrete plan of action. Nobody is willing to be as clear and concise about what the future will bring as the gravedigger in Warduj: "Dig them narrow!"

What has happened with all the billions that have been pumped into reconstruction projects in Afghanistan? What has become of the decade of German involvement in the northeastern provinces, which were the responsibility of Germany's armed forces until 2014? That area included Warduj in the Badakhshan province, where the effort is now being made to drive out the Taliban. Kunduz, which proved to be the most eventful region within Germany's area of responsibility, is no longer visited by foreigners. The Taliban dominate large parts of the province and have also infiltrated the provincial capital, which they have briefly occupied on several occasions.

A Bastian of Stability

When the 19-seater Beechcraft, part of the UN fleet, lands in Kunduz as part of its commuter flights to cities in northern Afghanistan that can no longer be reached by land, nobody gets on or off. To get to the last reasonably safe city in the area, you have to first fly to Faizabad and then drive west for three hours to Taloqan. By Afghan standards, the capital of the Takhar province is quite prosperous. The market is bustling and the police dare to patrol the plane tree-lined streets on their own. After a few phone calls, we head for the provincial government's guest house.

The next morning at 5:45 a.m., there's a knock at the door: "Let's go!" The deputy provincial governor is standing outside in sweatpants and accompanied by his bodyguards. "I'll show you what the Germans have done for us here, the most important projects! In the morning light! Because you have a photographer. Hurry up!" Farid Zaki has been the lieutenant governor of Takhar for 10 years, one of the rare management talents within Afghanistan's government apparatus.

We rush through the city, past the court, the hospital and the schools. "The Germans built or repaired all these things, as well as the power lines and the reinforcement along the riverbanks," he explains. Once the sun has risen over the city, the small convoy turns toward the university campus. Five-thousand men and 2,000 women are studying here to become teachers, civil engineers and lawyers -- and much of it has been financed with German money. There's even a daycare center. And even though it is Friday, which is usually a day off, construction workers are hard at work on the new medical faculty. Zaki, who studied political science in Bucharest, is proud of his city. He would also love to be proud of the rest of his province, which was part of Germany's area of responsibility for several years.

'No One Came to Help'

It's only a 15-minute drive to the front from here. A quarter of an hour from the relative progress of the provincial capital, five policemen, two men from the secret service and three members of Interior Ministry units are standing around two Humvees, each with mounted machine guns, on the outskirts of Baharak. It's the final eastern outpost before Kunduz. The men gaze nervously at the edge of the forest; they can see no further. In September, skirmishes against Taliban troops advancing out of Kunduz lasted for several days. Now, this small group is waiting for the next wave.

How many are they expecting the next time around? They shrug their shoulders and hesitate before answering: "Maybe around 600." The fact that they're even still standing here and weren't overrun weeks ago, is a testament to the man who drove us here: "Commander Khalil." He doesn't need more than a first name. Commander Khalil is a holdout from the time before 2001, when the mujahedeen of the Northern Alliance defended their last refuges against the Taliban here. The fighter holds no official post and he maintains his 120-member militia with the money he earns as a breeder of show horses and as a businessman. The private unit is on standby in Taloqan, ready to be dispatched at a moment's notice.

In describing the last battle that took place in September, Kahlil says: "No one came to help us for seven days -- not the army, not the Americans. Then I finally got them to attack from the air! I marked the Taliban position using the "offline maps" app and sent it to them. Otherwise, nobody does anything!" Listening to him, it becomes clear why civilians are hit so often. The others nod. "We're here because you're here!" Commander Khalil snorts approvingly.

He's still angry about a meeting that took place an hour earlier at the Baharak district governor's office, where he sat among government officials as though it were completely normal. The district police chief joined them a short time later.

It wasn't nice asking this question in the presence of the two, but the answer given was telling. "What would have happened to Baharak without the help of Khalil's militia?" The chief of police answers: "The revered commander has spent his life in combat. Now we have a common enemy, and we are very grateful to him!"

But would the city have fallen without him? "The government stands completely behind Baharak. We are here, so the city will never fall!"

While leaving a few minutes later, Khalil loses his temper and confronts the police chief: "How dare you? You have eight people and you call me every night -- come here, come there! Who always wants a car from us? What do you mean Baharak will never fall as long the police are defending the city?!" Chastened, the police chief whispers that Khalil was right and implores him to speak more quietly.

The Last Outpost

Now, during the visit at the last outpost, the reality of the current situation is once again in focus. Kahlil, though, is still out of sorts and wants to set something straight. "If you hadn't taken our weapons away from us back then, we could have defended ourselves properly!"

Who? Us?

"You Germans! The Bundeswehr! They disarmed us in 2004. I turned over 750 Kalashnikovs, a whole truck full! Now, they said, a state would be built up and it would protect us, and only its security forces could be armed. If need be, they said, they would be here to guarantee security. The German officers even gave me a receipt for the weapons!" A piece of paper in exchange for an entire arsenal.

Unfortunately, he is no longer able to find that receipt.

ISAF's disarmament program ended years ago, though the idea was the correct one at the time: A country can only function if it has a monopoly on the use of force and if armed militias no longer exist. But the people in Afghanistan ended up waiting for a state that never materialized to the point that it could guarantee their safety. And then the German troops withdrew from Kunduz and most of northern Afghanistan in October 2014. They do, however, still provide training to Afghan soldiers at the German base in Mazar-e-Sharif in the far west of the country.

The Taliban's Return

The Taliban came back. At times, they have been held at bay for a while. But they always return.

The final front in the north, which has been overrun several times, is held by a man who, with his finely chiseled facial features and salt and pepper hair, looks more like a literary scholar than a militia commander. His name is Mullah Omar, and because he shares a name with the revered founder of the Taliban, the Islamists have wanted him dead for the last 20 years.

Mullah Omar mumbles that he didn't choose the name and that even Ahmed Shah Massud, the legendary leader in the 1980s war against the Soviets, had even made jokes about it. "At some point, I got tired of it, so I told him: 'Then give me another name!' But Massud said no. 'You will always be our Mullah Omar to defeat the other Mullah Omar.'"

The other Mullah Omar, who founded the Taliban and granted Osama bin Laden asylum, died a few years ago. But the man who shares his name lives on. Indeed, he has served as the governor of his home district of Khwaja Ghar since 2006. Every few months, the Taliban captures a chunk of the district capital.

He suggests that we reporters take a walk through the small town. It's a place of fear. No one smiles and no one nods as Mullah Omar, surrounded by a dozen armed men, walks along the dusty main road.

People only speak when they are alone, and only at moments when they have no reason to fear they are being watched by a Taliban spy. Market vendors say they leave the city every afternoon to sleep in their villages. The last doctor in the town tells the story of a Taliban shell that struck the ground right next to a six-year-old girl. It didn't explode, but "she stopped speaking or eating or drinking anything. We even took her to the hospital in Taloqan. She just died there."

Ruins of a Future Afghanistan Once Had

The attack always begins at 2 or 3 a.m. When the Taliban briefly captured the town two years ago, they burned down the only large building, which had been the offices of Mullah Omar's small administration. The two-story, partly brick structure had once been the guest house of the giant Spinzar cotton spinning mill, built in the 1930s with the help of the Soviets. At one time, it employed more than 5,000 people throughout northern Afghanistan and processed the cotton that thrives in a perfectly dry, sunny climate. Spinzar went under during the wars. In Khwaja Ghar, they are the ruins of a future that Afghanistan once had.

Mullah Omar's shy police chief, whose men are fighting in this war, stops in front of the charred, collapsed beams. "We have repeatedly asked the government for its support. But the army always gets here too late and never stays. It would also be a great help if we got night vision goggles. The Taliban have some, but we don't. We can only shoot by ear in the dark. But by then, some of our troops are usually already dead."

At least, he says, the provincial police chief has been fired. He says he had always skimmed part of the salaries, food and ammunition and would sell the stolen goods on the black market. "We haven't met the new guy yet." But they are hopeful.

The scratchy radio noise that has been fizzling in the background is suddenly interrupted by a watchman who has been listening to Taliban frequencies. He says that Taliban spies had just reported the arrival of infidels in Khwaja Ghar -- likely a reference to the reporters from Germany. Mullah Omar says it's time to leave.

Living on Borrowed Time

Back in the security of Taloqan, the mobile phone network is switched off punctually at sunset in accordance with an agreement with the Taliban so that they don't blow up the masts. No one is allowed to make a phone call at night.

Later, the provincial governor will confirm that there are no night vision devices for the local forces. "They're not on the budget." But it's not a big problem, he adds. "God will help us!" His deputy Farid Zaki remains silent and still. Weeks later, the Taliban will again take Khwaja Ghar, only to be driven out again. Commander Khalil's brother will be shot dead in Baharak, but Mullah Omar will once again survive.

It is nonetheless clear, though, that he and his men are fighting a losing battle. Most of the commanders say that this war needs to come to an end and that negotiations with the Taliban are the only way out. They are also well aware that this state will cease to exist without the drones, helicopters and, most importantly, the money from the U.S., which continues to prop up the Afghanistan army.

The leaders in Kabul are living on borrowed time, but they didn't borrow it themselves. They are supposed to save a country that was handed to them in 2001. It is not a state that they had a hand in establishing, nor is it one they have ever had to defend on their own. Instead, they have focused most of their effort on plundering it. Indeed, the Taliban have proven to be the most stable of Afghanistan's political elements. Their goals may be reprehensible, but they do have one thing: an iron will to return to power.

The myth that has been perpetuated in the West over the past decade and a half that the Taliban was on the verge of being defeated was always wrong. The Taliban was able to make a comeback because of the corrupt governments of Hamid Karzai and Ashraf Ghani, because of the brutality showed by the Americans and because of the presence of foreign troops in general -- no matter how good their intentions were.

The Taliban says it is god's will to drive the foreign occupiers out of Afghan soil. It is almost impossible to counter the vehemence of that narrative. In part because the Taliban has also changed. The group has long since stopped burning down schools, instead leaving them alone, even primary schools for girls. Teachers' salaries continue to be paid by the government, along with support for the small clinics in Taliban-held areas.

Just as in the mountain valley of Warduj, where opponents in battle are buried next to each other, there are dozens of arrangements that extend beyond the front lines. Local councils of elders, for example, mediate so that government experts can repair defective flood-protection systems or tiny hydroelectric power plants in Taliban-held areas.

No one knows who will be controlling their area next year or even in a few months. Everything remains in limbo and the war rages on.

The main town in Warduj valley has now been free of Taliban for several weeks and the stores on Bazaar Street have once again opened their doors. A sense of relief, though, is not in the air, it's more of a wait-and-see approach. Yes, the government may be back in control, but locals say their lives weren't really all that different under the Taliban. The "cowboy" look with fringed jeans, particularly popular among girls (who would wear them under their burkas), was banned, as was music, at least initially. Only the barber complains that the Taliban weren't good for business: "I wasn't allowed to cut any beards," he says. "They preferred for everyone to let their hair grow."

But fighting continues in the highlands. And in the small cemetery, where the commander and the 16-year-old Taliban fighter were buried on the same morning, the graves of the enemy groups are coming closer and closer together. A new one is added every few days -- sometimes on the left and sometimes on the right. Dug narrow.

The rest is here:
Losing Afghanistan: Why a Deal with the Taliban May Be Inevitable - SPIEGEL ONLINE

Army announces winter deployments to Korea and Afghanistan – ArmyTimes.com

The Department of the Army has announced upcoming deployments to Afghanistan and South Korea for U.S. soldiers from 10th Mountain Division and 1st Infantry Division.

The 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, out of Fort Riley, Kansas, will deploy for a winter 2020 rotation to South Korea. The brigade will be replacing 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division. The deployment is part of a regular rotation of forces to the Korean Peninsula.

The rotation comes as U.S. forces on the peninsula consolidate at the mega-base that is Camp Humphreys. The new post is roughly 40 miles south of the long-time home for U.S. soldiers at Yongsan Garrison in Seoul, the capital of South Korea.

Dagger Brigade soldiers are well-trained and ready to support any mission our nation asks of them, said brigade commander Col. Thomas Murtha in a statement accompanying the release.

We are excited about our rotation to the Republic of Korea and look forward to strengthening our long-standing partnership with our allies, Murtha added.

Meanwhile, the Armys 1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division, stationed at Fort Drum, New York, will be rotating this winter to Afghanistan. The unit is replacing the 82nd Airborne Divisions 3rd Brigade Combat Team as part of the Armys commitment to Operation Freedom Sentinel in the country.

Three paratroopers from 3rd Brigade Combat Team died in Afghanistan this year. One paratrooper was killed by an IED blast near Bagram Air Base in early September, while the other two were killed in what was reported as an insider attack in July.

Sign up for the Army Times Daily News Roundup Don't miss the top Army stories, delivered each afternoon

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Army Times Daily News Roundup.

This year, soldiers have accounted for 13 of the Defense Departments 16 hostile deaths in Afghanistan, according to Pentagon figures as of Nov. 25.

The 1st Brigade Warriors are highly trained, disciplined and fit soldiers ready to win every mission the nation asks of them, said 10th Mountain Division commander Maj. Gen. Brian Mennes in a prepared statement.

Peace negotiations between the Taliban and U.S. diplomats broke down in September after an uptick in Taliban violence, including the death of one of those paratroopers, prompting President Donald Trump to halt the talks.

However, the president said in November that the talks had resumed to some degree and promised an eventual draw-down of troops.

We are ready at every echelon to support this mission, and we look forward to working with our international partners to help establish the conditions for long-term stability," 1st Brigade Combat Team commander Col. James Eldridge said in his own statement.

The Army previously announced that the 3rd Security Force Assistance Brigade out of Fort Hood, Texas, and the 10th Mountain Division Combat Aviation Brigade out of Fort Drum, New York, will be heading to Afghanistan this winter as well.

Read this article:
Army announces winter deployments to Korea and Afghanistan - ArmyTimes.com