Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

US citizen living in Afghanistan kidnapped on way to work: police – ABC News

An American citizen who is living in Afghanistan was kidnapped on his way to work on Sunday, Kabul police said.

The kidnapping took place in the Karte Char area of Kabul, according to Mohammad Almas, the head of the Kabul police's Crime Investigation Department (CID).

Almas said that the kidnappers posed in Afghan security forces uniforms in order to trick the victim into stopping his vehicle.

Police originally said that the man, whose name has not been released, was working on a World Bank project with the Afghan Ministry of Agriculture. But later on Sunday Alex Ferguson, a spokesman for the World Bank, denied the claim.

"No World Bank staff have been kidnapped," Ferguson told ABC News in an email. "Our understanding is that these reports refer to an employee of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAIL) who is working for the National Horticulture and Livestock Project (NHLP), which is funded by a World Bank managed trust fund."

The kidnapping follows a similar incident that took place in August of 2016, when two foreign national professors working at the American University of Afghanistan were kidnapped at gunpoint in Kabul.

The professors, Timothy Weeks, an Australian, and Kevin King, an American, were last seen in a video released by the Taliban in January of this year, according to a report in The New York Times.

ABC News' Ben Gittleson contributed to this report.

Read this article:
US citizen living in Afghanistan kidnapped on way to work: police - ABC News

AP: Pentagon to send nearly 4000 more troops to Afghanistan – USA TODAY

This photo taken on May 31, 2017 shows U.S. soldiers standing guard near the site of a car bomb in the Afghan capital Kabul.(Photo: Wakil Kohsar, AFP/Getty Images)

The Pentagon will send nearly 4,000 additional troops to Afghanistan in an effort to turn around a war that commanders have described as a stalemate, the Associated Press reported Thursday.

Earlier this week, President Trump provided his defense secretary, Jim Mattis, with the authority to determine troop levels in Afghanistan.

The AP cited a Trump administration source who was not authorized to discuss the decision publicly and said the decision could be announced as early as next week.

A Pentagon spokeswoman said no decision has been made yet.

"Any decisions about troop numbers will be made only after consultation with the interagency, the Afghan government, NATO allies and coalition partners," Dana White said.

A U.S. official who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to discuss the issue publiclysaid the Pentagon is still considering between 3,000 and 5,000 U.S. troops.

The Pentagon is reviewing the strategy for Afghanistan, which Mattis said may take several weeks. But the question of sending additional troops is considered urgent in order to halt recent Taliban advances as another fighting season gets underway. The Taliban generally steps up violence in the warm months, when snows melt and roads become passable.

The top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson, has said a few thousand additional troops would be required to turn the tide on militants.

We are not winning in Afghanistan right now, Mattis told Congress this week.

Marine Gen. Joe Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last month that it if the U.S.and NATO countries decide to increase forces they should be prepared to do so quickly.

Wed like to see if we (can) contribute to the Afghans success in the summer of '17,Dunford said.

There are about 8,400 U.S. troops in Afghanistan now in addition to several thousand troops from allied countries. NATO forces are also expected to increase troop levels in Afghanistan.

The Pentagon has said that any troop increase would not change the mission of the forces there. Afghan security forces are leading the fight and U.S. and NATO troops are serving as advisers and providing air and other critical support.

The additional troops will allow the U.S.-led coalition to provide more advisers to Afghan combat units.

The U.S. had as many as 100,000 troops in Afghanistan in 2010 and 2011, but in 2013 turned over the primary responsibility for the war to Afghan forces. In recent years, security in the country declined as the U.S. continued to decrease forces.

Read more:

Analysis: Trump and Pentagon search for way to end America's longest war

3 U.S. soldiers killed by Afghan army soldier in insider attack

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2ttk158

Read the rest here:
AP: Pentagon to send nearly 4000 more troops to Afghanistan - USA TODAY

Happy Father’s Day from Sacramento soldier in Afghanistan – Sacramento Bee


Sacramento Bee
Happy Father's Day from Sacramento soldier in Afghanistan
Sacramento Bee
A Sacramento soldier serving in Afghanistan provides a special Father's Day video greeting to his dad and father-in-law. U.S. Army Spc. Lorima Nasilasila is assigned to Task Force Flying Dragons, 16th Combat Aviation Brigade, 7th Infantry Division out ...

and more »

Original post:
Happy Father's Day from Sacramento soldier in Afghanistan - Sacramento Bee

US Strike Kills IS Media Head In Eastern Afghanistan – RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty

A U.S. air strike in Afghanistan's eastern Nangahar Province killed the Islamic State (IS) extremist group's director of media, U.S. forces have said.

The June 3 air strike, which targeted a major militant hub in the province's Achin district, cut the extremist group's communications and connections to IS in Syria, a U.S. statement said on June 16.

Jawad Khan's death "will disrupt the [IS] network, degrade their recruitment process, and hinder their attempts to conduct international operations," General John Nicholson, commander of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan, said in the statement.

Afghan and U.S. forces have been fighting IS militants in Nangarhar since January 2015. The province is the main foothold of the IS affiliate, which is loyal to the central leadership in Iraq and Syria.

In April, the U.S. dropped a massive bomb on IS positions in Nangarhar Province, killing more than 90 militants, according to the Afghan Defense Ministry.

Read the rest here:
US Strike Kills IS Media Head In Eastern Afghanistan - RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty

Petraeus: We went to Afghanistan for a reason, and we need to stay … – PBS NewsHour

JUDY WOODRUFF: Wars in Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq, tensions within the Gulf states, and a new administration trying to manage an exploding region, all topics for retired General David Petraeus.

He commanded American and coalition forces in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and served as overall commander of U.S. military operations in the Middle East. He later served as director of the CIA in 2011 and 2012. Hes now with a global investment firm.

We spoke a short time ago.

And I started by asking him about reports that the Trump administration will soon send 4,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, and whether he thinks it is a smart move.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS (RET.), Former Commander, Multi-National Force Iraq: I think it is, and its heartening.

I think what we need to get to in Afghanistan is a sustainable, measuring the expenditure of blood and treasure, a sustainable, sustained commitment. We need to recognize that we went there for a reason and we stayed for a reason, to ensure that Afghanistan is not once again a sanctuary for al-Qaida or other transnational extremists, the way it was when the 9/11 attacks were planned there.

Thats why we need to stay. We also have a very useful platform there for the regional counterterrorist effort. And, of course, we have greatly reduced the capabilities of al-Qaidas senior leaders in that region, including, of course, taking out Osama bin Laden.

But this is a generational struggle. This is not something that is going to be won in a few years. Were not going to take a hill, plant a flag, go home to a victory parade. And we need to be there for the long haul, but in a way that is, again, sustainable.

We have been in Korea for 65-plus years because there is an important national interest for that. We were in Europe for a very long period of time, still there, of course, and actually with a renewed emphasis now, given Russias aggressive actions.

And I think thats the way we need to approach this. Now, to be sure, the forces

(CROSSTALK)

JUDY WOODRUFF: Are you saying we may need to stay in Afghanistan 60, 70, 80 years?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: I wouldnt say 60, but I think we shouldnt approach this as a year-on-year mission.

I think that was actually harmful. I think it gave all of the Afghan leaders and so forth were basically get the jitters. Those who are investing money consider every year whether to keep it there or whether to go to Dubai.

I think this is an important interest, and I think we ought to have a sustained commitment, but at a level that is sustainable. And I think a few more, 3,000 to 5,000 more troops, are very sustainable, but also we should relax the remaining restrictions on the use of our airpower to support our Afghan partners who have shown that they are willing to fight and die for their country against al-Qaida, the insurgents of various types and so forth.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But, of course, the reason Im asking, as Americans look at Afghanistan, you say we may need to stay decades and decades. We have been there, the United States, 15 years. At times, we have had over 100,000 U.S. troops there. That didnt turn back the Taliban. Why should 3,000 or 4,000?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: It did actually turn back the Taliban.

You will remember I was the commander.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But not permanently.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: Not permanently.

As I said, we are not going to permanently win this. Keep in mind, theres a huge difference between Afghanistan and even Iraq when we did the surge there. You cant pressure the leaders of the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani Network, and even some of the other insurgent groups, because theyre out of our reach. Theyre in sanctuaries inside Pakistan.

And, indeed, there should be a regional effort there to try to get our Pakistani partners to do more to deny this sanctuary to those elements that are making life so difficult for Afghans and the Afghan government.

JUDY WOODRUFF: The other comment being made, General Petraeus, though, is that the administration has not laid out what its strategy is for Afghanistan. General Mattis himself said this week, were still working on it.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: They are.

And, indeed, I understand there have been a number of meetings at the principals level and so forth. The national security team is working on that. I do think you can anticipate an integrated strategy.

Again, the troops are just a part of this. Theyre an important part, because, without them, without halting the erosion of security that has characterized Afghanistan over the last year or more, then youre going to have a serious problem on your hands.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Lets talk about ISIS in Syria you mentioned Syria and in Iraq. We are told progress is being made against ISIS on the battlefield, but the coalition airstrikes, we are now told, these Strikes are resulting in hundreds and hundreds of civilian deaths.

Is that the price that Americans should be prepared to pay to get ahead of ISIS?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: We should absolutely minimize the civilian deaths, and theres no question that there will be more of these. This does happen in wartime.

There will be far fewer than certainly what the extremists, these very barbaric Islamic State forces, have done. But this is an enemy thats literally sheltering among the civilians. Thats whats making it so difficult to take this last remnant of the Islamic State in Mosul.

This is now old Mosul, the Old City. And, remember, I spent a year there as a two-star when we were in charge of Northern Iraq with the 101st Airborne. Its a rabbits warren. Its very tight. Its very difficult.

And the enemy has literally just literally barricaded itself in there with snipers, with suicide bombers, with explosives, rooms and houses rigged, surrounding themselves with civilians. And this is the most diabolically difficult challenge, even for the very skilled counterterrorism forces of the Iraqi army.

Thats whats really slowed this down. We can expect some of that in Raqqa. That operation has now began in Syria. That was until recently presumably the Islamic State headquarters. There are reports that some of these leaders have already led and moved town the Euphrates River Valley further to Deir el-Zour.

Thats going to be a tough fight, but its a much smaller city compared to the two million, lets say, of probably a quarter or less the size of Mosul.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Im moving us through some very difficult areas very quickly, but I now want to turn now to Saudi Arabia, the Gulf nations.

President Trump was there just very recently trying to put present a united front with the Saudis and these other countries, mainly against Iran, but it turns out they are they have turned against Qatar, and the president has signaled that he has problems with Qatars support for terrorist activities.

At the same time, his administration has said, we hope these countries can work together.

What is the strategy, the approach that the United that we should expect, that we should understand as Americans about the administrations policy there?

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: Well, Secretary of State Tillerson is taking charge of this now. Hes trying to get the temperature down some.

Clearly, theres been a frustration that boiled over with the Emiratis, our close partners the Emiratis and the Saudis, against our other close partners the Qataris. Of course, its the Central Command forward headquarters. My forward headquarters is inside outside Doha at Al Udeid Air Base.

They gave us $100 million for that. But I have to say, at times, I went there and said, look, youre giving us all this money for our forward headquarters, and then Al-Jazeera is hammering us every day in the news. There is something not right here.

And similar frustrations have, again, just boiled over, also, the allegations of support of political Islam. You have to understand that, for the Emiratis especially, there is more worry about Muslim Brotherhood kind of activity than there actually is with Iran or even the Islamic State.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed will explain, we can see the extremists, we can see the Iranians. The insidious creep of political Islam is more difficult. And Qatar has allowed the heads of Hamas, Muslim Brothers, other political Islam organizations in the region to locate there.

These are all three our friends, our partners. I hope would be that, in this case, Secretary of State Tillerson can indeed get the temperatures down, get talking going on behind closed doors, rather than out as visibly as it has been, because that makes it very difficult, and you start to back different friends into corners.

But its hard. The United States, in some respects, needs to avoid being engaged in a beauty contest, where we have to say which is the fairest of them all. Thats not fair to us and its not fair to them. And I think that this is resolvable, but its not going to be easy.

JUDY WOODRUFF: General David Petraeus, thank you very much for stopping by.

GEN. DAVID PETRAEUS: Pleasure, as always.

See the original post:
Petraeus: We went to Afghanistan for a reason, and we need to stay ... - PBS NewsHour