Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

Afghanistan: Nine sacked over Kabul hospital attack – BBC News


BBC News
Afghanistan: Nine sacked over Kabul hospital attack
BBC News
Nine military officers have been sacked over last month's attack by militants on the military hospital in Kabul, the Afghan defence ministry says. Those dismissed include a general and a colonel. All face prosecution for negligence, the ministry said ...
American University of Afghanistan reopens after attackTimes Higher Education (THE)
Afghanistan sacks top generals for their 'negligence' that aided attack on military hospitalThe Indian Express
Afghanistan refutes Russia's support to Taliban demands for foreign troops exitThe Siasat Daily
Daily Pakistan
all 8 news articles »

Read the original here:
Afghanistan: Nine sacked over Kabul hospital attack - BBC News

"Afghanistan has more hectares (of opium poppies) planted today than they had before we started this war." – PolitiFact

Afghan farmer in his poppy field in eastern Afghanistan. (AP)

President Donald Trumps budget puts a number of foreign assistance programs at risk, if not outright elimination. His plan to cut about 30 percent from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development has drawn resistance from both Republicans and Democrats.

At a March 28 hearing, Rep Ted Yoho, R-Fla., came to the defense of several prominent projects, including the Overseas Private Investment Corporation and two Obama-era programs aimed at boosting electric capacity in Africa and agriculture globally. But Yoho did agree with cuts in one area -- the war on drugs. He said it was ineffective.

"I look at the poppy fields in Afghanistan," Yoho said. "They have more hectares planted today than they had before we started this war." Opium poppies produce a key ingredient for heroin and other opioids.

Afghanistan remains the worlds top opium poppyproducer, despite the billions of dollars America has put into the country. Since late 2001 when the United States and its allies retaliated against the Taliban and al-Qaida for the 9/11 attacks, America has spent about $25 billion to rebuild Afghanistans economy and $8.5 billion to rid it of narcotics.

Yohos office said he got his information from a United Nations report. The latest survey found that in 2016, farmers were growing poppies on more than 200,000 hectares. In 2002, the number was 74,000 hectares.

The U.N.s chart below shows the pattern over the decades. The black lines show the high and low estimates. In conflict zones, satellite images replaced on-the-ground observations.

Aside from a few years, the land under poppy cultivation has trended up. The actual tons produced has jumped aroundmore, but it too is higher today than in 2002. The big drop in 2001 came after the Taliban banned production in 2000. The Taliban later reversed itself, leading to a rapid spread after 2012.

According to the U.N., most of the opium comes from Afghanistans southern provinces.

Only in terms of Gross Domestic Product does opium play a smaller role than in the past. The International Monetary Fund reported that in 2004, opium exports were equal to half of the countrys non-opium GDP. Today, it is closer to about 15 percent.

But it still provides about 400,000 jobs, more than the Afghan National Security Forces.

Reports from the private research group RAND and the World Bank say the driver is simple economics. Opium offers a better return to farmers than most crops. In a regrettable twist, American-led efforts to make legal crops more lucrative can backfire.

In Helmand Province, a project successfully shifted a number of landowners away from poppies, but then they no longer needed the sharecroppers and tenant farmers who had been working the land. World Bank researchers said this "created a displaced, cheap, and mobile population, skilled in poppy cultivation." They moved to marginal land and poppy production increased.

Our ruling

Yoho said Afghanistan has more land producing poppies than before the U.S. war began. U.N. surveys back that up. In 2002, the country had about 74,000 hectares in poppy cultivation. In 2016, the number was over 200,000. The amount of land used for growing poppies has gone up and down, but the long term trend is definitely up.

We rate this claim True.

Share the Facts

1

7

True

"Afghanistan has more hectares (of opium poppies) planted today than they had before we started this war."

Ted Yoho

U.S. Representative from Florida

In a house hearing

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

03/28/2017

Read more here:
"Afghanistan has more hectares (of opium poppies) planted today than they had before we started this war." - PolitiFact

The threat of Islamic State and Russia’s renewed interest in Afghanistan – The Express Tribune

Moscow maintains the militant group has regional ambitions and terrorism could eventually hit Russia.

In this file photo, Russia's President Vladimir Putin (R) shakes hands with Afghanistan's President Ashraf Ghani during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Ufa, Russia, July 10, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS

Global militant group Islamic State has a simple game-plan to first establish its strict version of Islam in Muslim countries and then conquer other parts of the world to purge them of what it calls ignorance. And that is why its presence in the Nangarhar province of Afghanistan is a source of concern not just to Pakistan, but to countries as far as Russia and China.

Since 2015, when it first made a public appearance in Afghanistan, Islamic State has proved its growing power with deadly attacks in the country and neighbouring Pakistan. Already in cahoots with Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, the militant group has extended its influence by establishing alliances with Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and militants from China and Central Asian Republics (CARs).

How strong is Islamic State in Pakistan?

With regional rivalries and instability in Afghanistan providing a conducive environment for Islamic State to grow, stakeholders have decided to come together to address the growing menace before it is too late. In this regard, Russia will be hosting a 12-party conference this month with the aim to start peace talks between Afghan Taliban and the Kabul government. Though the US has turned down the invitation to attend on the pretext that Washington was not consulted in advance, representatives from Pakistan, Afghanistan, China, Iran, India and several CARs will attend the consultative meeting in Moscow. Participation of Afghan Taliban is uncertain at the moment but they have shown willingness to talk to Kabul.

Russian interest in Afghanistan

Russia is concerned about Islamic States growth in Afghanistan due to its proximity to CARs. Russian envoys at the UN and in Kabul have expressed their fears in this connection several times; Moscow maintains the militant group has regional ambitions.

Russia detains man over IS-claimed attack on Chechen base

Secondly, the withdrawal of Nato forces from Afghanistan and confusing US policy for the country has created a power vacuum in Afghanistan which Russia is interested in filling to avoid turmoil in its immediate neighbourhood. It fears that in the case of an unstable Afghanistan, terrorism would finally hit Russia which has a large Muslim population.

Russia is also interested in the economic projects aimed at connecting the entire region such as China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Program both of which need a stable Afghanistan to work.

Drug trafficking into Russia through Central Asian countries that share borders with Afghanistan is another major worry for Moscow. Afghanistan supplies 90 per cent of the global opiate stock and producers target Russia as one of the largest markets in the world.

Why is this meeting needed?

Mistrust and differences between regional and international players are not only delaying establishment of peace in the region but also fuelling terrorism all stakeholders, be it from the region or the West, share the same strategic goal of stability but disagree on tactical front which is proving counterproductive to the ongoing counter-terrorism efforts and raising the level of threat.

No end to terrorism without better Pakistan-Afghanistan-India ties

Suspicion between the players is no secret Pakistan, Afghanistan and India blame each other for destabilising their countries while Russia accuses the US of supporting Islamic State in Afghanistan and Washington claims Moscow is supporting the Taliban.

In this atmosphere of finger-pointing, it is important for all concerned countries to come together, address each others concerns and chalk out a coordinated plan for peace which reconciles everyones strategic and tactical goals.

Chances of success

The ideal outcome of the upcoming Moscow conference would be to unify international support and create an environment to promote the Afghan peace process.

Fortunately, Kabul and Taliban have given positive signals for the resumption of talks which were stalled after the news of Taliban chief Mullah Omars death was made public in 2015. Further, Pakistan and Afghanistan have already held talks in London agreeing over the mechanism for addressing each others security concerns. Coordination with Russia, China, Iran and CARs is also on the right track. Despite difference with Moscow, Washington is likely to come on board.

Pakistan, Russia and China inch closer to formal alliance

The toughest task would be the Islamabad-New Delhi ties; the last two meetings in Moscow in some way reduced differences between the two countries over the peace process in Afghanistan but certain long-standing issues such as Kashmir are still an irritant. Tehran, Moscow, Beijing and Washington need to play their role in reducing tensions between the two South Asian neighbours, making them cooperate on peace initiatives and resuming dialogue.

Imdad Hussain is an Islamabad-based journalist specialising in diplomatic and security issues.

Originally posted here:
The threat of Islamic State and Russia's renewed interest in Afghanistan - The Express Tribune

Durand line comment sparks uproar in Afghanistan – Geo News, Pakistan

PESHAWAR: Abdul Latif Pedram, a prominent Afghan lawmaker and the head of the National Congress Party, is facing backlash after he called for the recognition of the Durand Line as an official border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

On Sunday, Pedram told reporters in Kabul, I once again announce that the Line is an international border and Afghanistan and Pakistan should respect each other and respect the border of each other and refrain from interfering in internal affairs of each other, he was quoted as saying by the Voice of Americas Afghan service.

Pedram is also the leader of Afghanistans Tajik ethnic group.

Shortly after his statement, the Afghan senate witnessed a heated debated. This is not acceptable to the people of Afghanistan. That side of the Line is our land and it belongs to us, said senate speaker Fazel Hadi Muslimyar, as quoted by Tolo News, if anyone has any kind of imagination in this respect, it is unacceptable.

There is not a single Pashtoon in Pedrams party - this coward man, said another senator.

The Durand Line, which runs over 2,000 km between Pakistan and Afghanistan, was first drawn up in 1893 under British colonial rule. Afghanistan disputes the legitimacy of much of the border.

Last month, Pakistan announced that it would be fencing off this northwestern border to prevent the infiltration of terrorists and smugglers from crossing over. Work on the barrier has already begun in the Bajaur and Mohmand districts of Pakistans federally administered tribal areas.

Pedram is under immense pressure, said Meelad, a Kabul-based freelance journalist, Everyone in Afghanistan is demanding for him to take his statement back. It is a matter of serious discomfort here.

Calls for a recognised border are in stark contrast to the popular opinion amongst lawmakers in Afghanistan. Hamid Karzai, the countrys former president, echoed the sentiment last month when he said Afghanistan would never accept the Durand Line as an international border. His statement was in response to Pakistan unilaterally closing the two main border crossings for 32 days, after a blitz of bombings in the country, which were traced back to militants in Afghanistan. Pakistans Prime Minister later reopened the Pak-Afghan border as a gesture of goodwill.

See the article here:
Durand line comment sparks uproar in Afghanistan - Geo News, Pakistan

Pakistan, China, Afghanistan dominated Mattis-Doval meet: US official – Hindustan Times

A defence official said Mattis and Doval talked about China and there were a number of concerns with respect to Pakistan...counter-terrorism, nuclear weapons.

Presence of terror safe havens in Pakistan, aggressive Chinese behaviour and the Afghanistan situation dominated last months meeting between US Defence Secretary Gen (retd) James Mattis and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, according to an American defence official.

They talked a lot about China...the concern about China sometimes bullying some of its neighbours in the region. There was concern about that, a US defence official told PTI about the Mattis-Doval meeting at the Pentagon on March 24.

This was the highest-level interaction of Mattis with a top Indian official after becoming the Defence Secretary.

Read more

China is also very important to the US with regard to the North Korea situation, said the defence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Pakistan and Afghanistan were the two major topics of discussion between the two leaders, the official said.

They talked about Pakistan, the official said, adding that Doval talked more on the issue than Mattis.

There was not a whole lot specifics. We have a number of concerns with respect to Pakistan...counter-terrorism, nuclear weapons. They talked a little bit about that. It is obviously a concern of Indias and it is an important player in the region and the world, the defence official said.

The US would like to see Pakistan in a situation with it where they can have a productive relationship, the official said.

They talked a lot about Afghanistan...and the need to try to get it...just finish it (the war). It has been going on (for) too long, the defence official said.

The official explained that this meant finish the operations and leave (Afghanistan) in a stable state.

Read more

While successive US administrations have praised Indias developmental assistance in Afghanistan, some recent media reports both in India and the US have referred to Trump Administrations desire of enhanced military role of India in the war-torn country.

The official said he did not recall any such conversation during the Pentagon meeting.

Reflecting on the meeting, the official said the Defence Secretary is very keen on India.

Mattis recognises the important role that it plays in the region and the world and Its unique position vis-a-vis Pakistan, vis-a-vis China, said the defence official.

Secretary Mattis wants to have a solid defence relationship with India, the official said.

The Secretary was interested in listening from the NSA what Indias perspective was on most of these issues, both regional and global.

I think, the NSA probably did most of the talking. It bodes well for the future. I think, he (Mattis) wants to have a solid defence relationship with India, the official said in response to a question.

Doval made a quite visit to the United States for a few days around March 20, during which he also met the Homeland Security Secretary Gen (retd) John Kelly and US National Security Advisor Lt Gen H R McMaster.

See the original post:
Pakistan, China, Afghanistan dominated Mattis-Doval meet: US official - Hindustan Times