Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

NPR says attack on its journalists in Afghanistan was targeted – CBC.ca

Ariana Grande returns to the stage for Manchester benefit show

PHOTOS

'Milestones that tell the stories of this country:' new stamps celebrate Canada's 150th birthday

Tiny P.E.I. hamlet readies Stompin' Tom Centre for 'perfect' Canada Day opening

Roberta Bondar inspiring youth to mark Ontario 150 with photos of nature

Different Games conference gives voice to marginalized video game makers

AWARD SHOWS

Awards shows tackle gender variance issues over 'male' and 'female' categories

Gordon Lightfoot and massive fireworks planned for Canada 150 in Ottawa

From Book to Film

Making smart toilet humour a test for Captain Underpants crew as antihero hits big screen

WHITE HOUSE SHOWS

Where do House of Cards, Veep and other White House shows go in the Trump era?

New Twin Peaks series joins growing list of reboots and revivals

Analysis

Beleaguered Canadian music festivals struggle to fill fields

Stand-up Comedy

Tracy Morgan, Sarah Silverman help Netflix ramp up comedy offerings

MOVIE REVIEW

Alien: Covenant Same old slime, but a good time

Foggy future for Canadian music videos as MuchFact funding up in the air

THE POWER OF DANCE

Dancing towards the light: Nunavut youth use music to keep suicide at bay

CRTC licence renewals threaten Canadian programs, say critics

GAME REVIEW

Injustice 2: Super-powered fisticuffs with a story worth watching

ARTS

'Emerging Indigenous Voices' award far surpasses fundraising goal

Sk8er Boi

So complicated: Why the relentless Avril Lavigne clone conspiracy persists

Origins of 'eh': How 2 little letters came to define Canadians

Mortal Kombat co-creator Ed Boon gives Batman, Superman the video game treatment with Injustice 2

APPROPRIATION

'I invited these Indigenous writers ... and then I insulted them:' Hal Niedzviecki on appropriation uproar

Cultural appropriation vs. artistic licence: How far have we really come?

CULTURE

Screen and stage treatments of disability often miss the mark, critic says

Feature

From pumpkins to polka dots: Yayoi Kusama's Infinity Mirrors soothe frayed nerves in D.C.

Art Abroad

3 Canadians make modern splash at Venice Biennale, while Pootoogook becomes 1st Inuit artist to show

Students compete for scholarships at Cineplex's college e-sports tournament in Toronto

More:
NPR says attack on its journalists in Afghanistan was targeted - CBC.ca

Why the US Must Stay the Course in Afghanistan | The Heritage … – Heritage.org

The desire to bring the boys home after wars end is deeply engrained in the American psyche.

Americans tend to get impatient with long-lasting military commitments overseas and like to see an end in sight. It is an understandable and noble impulse, and reflects the deep connection many Americans feel with family, friends, and neighbors serving in the military.

History has shown, however, that peace and stability often depends on America being willing to accept a presence on foreign soil, and to be committed there for decades into the future after wars have been won.

U.S. military bases in Europe are a case in point. So are the U.S. troops stationed in South Korea and Japan.

These bases have been part of a 70-year commitment, begun directly after World War II. This commitment has kept the peace and formed the foundation for an unprecedented period of global prosperity.

Next week, the Pentagon is due to presentPresident Donald Trumpwith itsplanfor future deployments in Afghanistan. The terrorist attack that killed 90 and wounded more than 400 people inKabulon May 31 was a sobering reminder of the countrys fragile security situation.

The United States and its NATO allies currently have 12,500 troops stationed in the country, of which 8,500 are Americans. They are there to help train and shore up the Afghan military.

It is expected the Pentagon will recommend reinforcing the NATO mission with a deployment of an additional 5,000 to keep the Taliban from resurging. There is no doubt that it is in our interestand the interest of the Afghan peopleto remain in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future.

Asnotedby the Heritage Foundations Luke Coffey, we have in fact made considerable progress in defanging the Taliban. Coffey writes:

Today, according to the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstructions most recent quarterly report to Congress, the Taliban has control or influence in only 11 out of 407 districts across Afghanistan, equaling only 9 percent of the countrys population.

By contrast, 66 percent of Afghanistans population live under the control or influence of the Afghan government. The remaining 25 percent of the population lives in contested areas.

This is a far cry from the days when it harbored al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that launched the most lethal attack ever against the United States on Sept. 11, 2001.

Additionally, we have the painful, recent example of what happened in Iraq when President Barack Obama pulled U.S. troops out in 2011 to fulfill his campaign promise.

The Iraqi military on its own was in no way ready to contain the advance of ISIS out of Syria, the JV team as Obama dismissively called the terrorist group.

Today, the world is dealing with the consequences of the horribly misguided U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq (which Obama even had to partially reverse as the consequences became clear).

Let us remain steadfast in Afghanistan. It is in the interest of all that the United States remain committed to denying the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and ISIS another safe haven in that country.

Visit link:
Why the US Must Stay the Course in Afghanistan | The Heritage ... - Heritage.org

Does Afghanistan Seek Rapprochement With Pakistan? – The Diplomat

Where are Pakistan and Afghanistans relations are headed after the peace conference in Kabul?

The recent surge of violence in Afghanistan has renewed fears of widespread public protest in the country. Last weeks devastating terrorist attack in Kabul killed at least 150 people and injured more than 300, leaving it the countrys deadliest attack on civilians since the 2001 U.S. invasion.

Just days after the Kabul attack, Afghanistan hosted an international peace conference, called the Kabul process, to explore ways to restore peace in the country. While the conference, like numerous other conferences, is unlikely to produce quick measurable results, the venue saw Afghan President Ashraf Ghani emphasize the need to formulate a collective regional security plan.

Moreover, while addressing the conference, Ghani singled out Pakistan for allegedly supporting insurgent groups in Afghanistan which, he believed, had undermined the countrys security and stability. More specifically, the allegations on Afghanistans part were aimed at Pakistans military and its alleged support for the Afghan Taliban. Pakistans civilian and military leadership rejected Kabuls allegations, say that they were just baseless propaganda.

Pakistans foreign officesaid in a statement that The onus of setbacks and failures in Afghanistan should not be blamed on Pakistan. Mere rhetoric of blaming others to hide their failures in Afghanistan will not solve the problem. In a separate response, the military in Pakistan said that instead of blaming Pakistan, Afghanistan needs to look inward and identify the real issues.

While bilateral relations between Kabul and Istanbul remain hostile, the rapidly worsening security situation in Afghanistan and growing rifts within Ghanis government may force the current Afghan leadership into reaching out to Islamabad for support.

In his speech at the peace conference last week, while Ghani criticized Pakistan, he also highlighted the its legitimate interests in Afghanistan and Kabuls willingness to address Islamabads concerns. We recognize that Pakistan has legitimate regional security interests and we have offered the appropriate guarantees of neutrality, Ghani said. Clearly, the statement was aimed at dispelling Islamabads anxieties regarding Indias overwhelming influence in Afghanistan, which has primarily been the driving force when it comes to Pakistans policy formulations towards Afghanistan.

When Ghani came into office, he tried a policy of reconciliation with Pakistan, which didnt produce any results as far as the countrys militancy problem is concerned. A number of political stakeholders in Afghanistan that dont favor reconciliation with Pakistan due to its questionable policies towards Kabul forced Ghani into taking a hard-line approach towards Islamabad. As a consequence, the last year in Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral dealings have seen both countries mutually accuse each other of being tied up with insurgent groups. Not more than a month ago, Ghani denied Pakistans top civilian and military leaderships request to visit Afghanistan.

Ghanis latest attempt to reach out to Pakistan has happened because of the very reason that previously became the cause of fallout between the current Afghan government and Islamabad. The recent wave of suicide bombings and growing public discontent has isolated president Ghani to an extent that he has no other way but to seek help from Pakistan.

While speaking at the event, Ghani said that I would be remiss to my people if I did not say that our top priority must go to finding an effective way to dialogue with Pakistan. Ghanis policy of hostility towards Islamabad has not achieved anything besides temporarily warding off the political pressure at home. Arguably, the Afghans governments policy of non-reconciliation towards Pakistan has even failed to achieve the basic objective of securing domestic support for the government: while rifts within Ghanis government are deepening, the recent violence has provoked widespread unrest,with protesters camping out in the capital. If suicide bombings continue to take place, which appears very likely, the Afghan governments political isolation will further deepen, which doesnt bode well for the Ghanis regime survival.

On the other hand, its in Pakistans interest that Ghani doesnt lose control of his government, which may allow other anti-Pakistan stakeholders more political space in Kabul. Previously, Pakistans response to Ghanis overtures was criticized for failing to bring any substantial change in the Afghan Talibans policy or demands. Now, however, if Pakistan can deliver to the extent of reducing the scale of violence in Afghanistan, it should be considered nothing less than a clear achievement. With an improved security situation at home while Pakistan doesnt seem under pressure to comply with Ghanis indirect requests for help, any improvement in Afghanistans security situation can establish Pakistans position of being a vital player in the Afghan peace process.

Undoubtedly, further delays in putting together a unified regional policy to secure peace in the country will prove detrimental to any eventual efforts at the regional or national level in this regard. This can simply happen due to the ascendance of the Islamic State (ISIS) in Afghanistan, which is only going to add to the countrys ongoing militancy challenge.

If the government in Afghanistan is looking for an ally in Pakistan, then Islamabad needs to respond positively rather than undermining an already isolated president, which will not serve Pakistans interests in any way.

Originally posted here:
Does Afghanistan Seek Rapprochement With Pakistan? - The Diplomat

Should We Still Be in Afghanistan? – CNSNews.com

Should We Still Be in Afghanistan?
CNSNews.com
Chances are, you heard plenty about the latest terrorist attacks in Britain. But the chances that you heard about the most recent attack in Afghanistan in which a suicide truck bomber set off his deadly payload in rush-hour traffic near the German ...

Read the original post:
Should We Still Be in Afghanistan? - CNSNews.com

Rashid Khan rips the fight out of West Indies – ESPNcricinfo.com

West Indies v Afghanistan, 1st ODI, St Lucia June 9, 2017

Afghanistan 212 for 6 (Ahmadi 82, Nurse 2-34) beat West Indies 149 (Rashid 7-18) by 63 runs Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Rashid Khan looked like he would get a wicket with every ball Getty Images

Afghanistan had won on four previous occasions when Rashid Khan had picked up four wickets or more. But Friday brought him one of his tougher challenges: he had only 212 to defend on a sluggish St Lucia surface but that only seemed to spur him on. The 18-year old legspinner finished with 7 for 18 - the fourth-best haul in ODI history - and West Indies were bowled out for 149.

The 63-run victory for Afghanistan, their first in this format over a Full Member other than Zimbabwe or Bangladesh, exposed the ineptness of a West Indies unit struggling in their quest to qualify directly for the 2019 World Cup.

Rashid, introduced in the 23rd over with West Indies seemingly steady at 68 for 2, broke open the game by picking up wickets off his first two deliveries. And if that isn't impressive enough, he struck on consecutive balls in the 25th as well to be on a hat-trick twice during the course of his first two overs, opening his spell with figures of 4 for 1. The lone run conceded came courtesy of a dubious wide call in which a googly spun in from outside leg stump to strike Jonathan Carter's back leg after a missed sweep before ricocheting to fine leg.

Jason Mohammed played for a straight ball when there was turn, debutant Roston Chase fell for a golden duck, completely deceived by a googly, Shai Hope was snaffled courtesy Mohammad Nabi's brilliance at slip and Jason Holder's defence was breached by a ripping wrong 'un. At 70 for 6, West Indies were railroaded, having to switch back to survival mode.

That didn't prevent Ashley Nurse from trying ungainly slogs and was quickly shown his place by a skiddy googly that gave Rashid his second five-for in ODIs. The upset was sealed in the 45th over, fittingly with another Rashid googly, as Afghanistan added to the shockwaves that rocked the cricket world this night. After all, it was only a few hours previously that another underdog, Bangladesh, had stunned New Zealand in the Champions Trophy.

While Rashid walked away with the plaudits - among bowlers with at least 50 wickets, he has the best bowling average (15.05) and strike-rate (22.3) - it was opener Javed Ahmadi quietly worked his way through to make 81, his highest ODI score, to set the game up. He showed the resolve to fight through testing spells from Shannon Gabriel and Miguel Cummins and, given he had to face a lot of short-pitched bowling, he also showed that he was particularly strong square of the wicket. Forty of his runs, including four fours and a six, came behind point.

Ahmadi built the platform in a slow, but assured, second-wicket stand of 55 with Rahmat Shah, before West Indies hit back with two quick strikes. They went into a shell against Nurse, who used the strong breeze to drift the ball away from the right-handers. He took out Asghar Stanikzai, who played for turn when there was none, and Samiullah Shenwari, who was unfortunately given out as the ball lobbed to slip off his forearm while trying to reverse sweep.

With Afghanistan at 131 for 5 in the 38th over, and Ahmadi back in the pavilion as well, West Indies had a firm grip over the contest. But Gulbadin Naib used his muscle to pepper the legside boundary and take apart Jason Holder, who conceded 36 off his last three overs. Naib would hammer three fours and two sixes in his unbeaten 28-ball 41. The 58-run stand for the eighth wicket with Mohammad Nabi, who quietly finished 27 not out, would signal the change in momentum for Afghanistan.

West Indies would have hoped for a brisk start from their batsmen but it was not to be and by being diffident and overcautious, they played themselves into a situation where one costly lapse could trigger an alarming slide. And slide they did.

Shashank Kishore is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Originally posted here:
Rashid Khan rips the fight out of West Indies - ESPNcricinfo.com