Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

The Great Afghanistan Hope – Powder Magazine

When the two men slid through the finish line in the World Alpine Ski Championships at St. Moritz last week, they didnt have quite the same crowds that lined the racecourse at Corviglia, the slope where champions like Frances Tessa Worley and Switzerlands Beat Feuz would clinch gold. Coming in 73rd and 74th out of 75 finishers, they didnt qualify for the main event, the mens giant slalom at Corviglia, which takes just the 50 top finishers from the qualifiers.

But what they did was still a historic first.

The two menSajjad Husaini, 25, and Alishah Farhang, 26were the first skiers from Afghanistan ever to complete in the world championships. The hope is that this is just one step toward a national team for Afghanistan and the Olympics next year.

The story of how the two skiers came from Afghanistan to St. Moritzwhere they have spent the last three seasons traininginvolves, like the sport itself, both passion and teamwork.

We are not aiming for a gold medal or a victory for my country, says Farhang. We are trying to show a positive image of Afghanistan to the world. When people hear Afghanistan, they think war, violence, killing each other. I cannot ignore that. It is some of that. But its not as much as you hear in the media. And we can bring a positive change through sport.

Switzerlands Inferno: The Worlds Oldest and Longest Downhill Race.

Both Husaini and Farhang were living at Bamyan, at large town at 8,200 feet in the Hindu Kush of central Afghanistan. Winter there can last half a year, and the peak is snow-capped even in June. But neither of them had ever thought about skiing before.

I had no idea what this ski is. I didnt watch it on the TV, says Farhang. Although some locals from the area do make wooden skis by hand, he says, until a few years ago, he wouldnt have even understood what they were for. I didnt ski on these wooden skis. Never. Because I had no ideawhat are these skis?

And then, about six years ago, a Swiss reporter named Christoph Zrcher found himself stuck near Bamyan, trapped thanks to fighting on the roads.

You sit there and you look at those mountains, Zrcher says. As a Swiss, you can imagine it doesnt take too long before you think about skiing. Hey, guys, does anybody ski here? They said Ski, whats that? And then I said, Oh, what a shame. And decided to go back to Switzerland and organize 30 pairs of skis and ski boots to bring back.

Soon after first bringing equipment to Bamyan, Zrcher helped organize a ski club. Based in Zurich, the Bamyan Ski Club is a nonprofit thats introducing skiing to locals, as well as raising Bamyans profile as a ski resort for foreigners.

Getting locals to become interested in skiing wasnt quite as easy as Zrcher had expected. At first, they were wary of strapping the equipment to their feet and sliding downhill.

In the end we just dished out $10 bills, Zrcher says, laughing. But even then, it wasnt easy. Most would try for a day or two, thensurprised at just how tricky it wasgive it up.

So Zrcher and the others had an idea: Theyd run an Afghan Ski Challenge, a ski race taking place over a two-mile course. The winner would receive a Swiss watch. Every year, the number of participants in the contest grew a bit more. This year, there were around 80.

Two of the winnersFarhang and Husainigot more than a Swiss watch. They also have been given training with a professional coach for two months a year in St. Moritz, as well as food and lodging in the infamously pricy resort (courtesy of the town itself). And, of course, two slots in this weeks championships.

Even if they didnt win the race, both Farhang and Husaini have come a long way since their first days on skis. Both were inspired to take up the sport when they saw the ski clubs members on snow. But even though they wanted to try the sport, it wasnt always easy.

The first time Farhang tried skiing, he said, the guide he was with took him to a high, steep slope.

That was a very difficult experience. I was just rolling over into the snow, and I did not like it at all that day. The next day, I took a day off because I was so tired, he says. Then another day I said, OKIm going to try in a flatter part. Then it was more fun.

Coming to St. Moritz for the first time, meanwhile, was another hurdle. There was culture shock and being away from familybut even the mountain and the conditions were different.

Our mountain is higher. Even the Bamyan town is very high; it is 2,500 meters above the sea level, says Husaini. The snowhere it is more wet, Bamyan is more dry. At Bamyan, he goes on to explain, the snow is so light, you feel like youre floating. Here, he had to learn to carve.

On the other hand, infrastructure at St. Moritzthe worlds first winter resortaffords much better access. Bamyan doesnt have anything in the way of a rope tow; any skiing has to be earned the hard way.

Every day, sometimes three hours, sometimes four hours, we have to walk up, and then its 10 or 15 minutes of skiing down. You are a really good skier if its just one and a half minutes, Husaini says.

One thing, though, has remained the same whether theyre skiing in St. Moritz or Bamyan: the fun of it.

When I was a child, I would also do some sledding on the snow, Husaini says. But when I saw [the skiers at Bamyan] I thought, Oh, this is even more amazing than the sledding. And faster. And more joyful.

See more here:
The Great Afghanistan Hope - Powder Magazine

Interpreter for US Military in Afghanistan Seeks Asylum in Iowa – whotv.com

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

IOWA FALLS, Iowa -- Starting in 2007, Zalmay Niazy began working as an interpreter for the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan.

"It was a very good career that I had and I'm very proud that I helped the United States Armed Forces," said Niazy.

But putting his life on the line for America was something that did not sit well with the Taliban.

"The Taliban and the bad guys were always threatening me and my family and they were always giving us a hard time, and they kidnapped my uncle from the house and they killed him because I was an interpreter," said Niazy.

Niazy came to America in December of 2014, seeking political asylum. But despite his best efforts, he's run into a roadblock.

This is why Niazy brought his situation to Senator Charles Grassley's attention at a town hall meeting in Iowa Falls. At the meeting, Niazy said, "I came here, sir. I applied for political asylum. I hired a lawyer in Des Moines and...he's going through all the process and from the last two years and four months I haven't heard anything from the asylum process from there, and I always contact them. I always send them and they just give me a one year work permit and it expires."

Senator Grassley responded by saying to Niazy, who was standing right next to him, "You've hired a lawyer. I wish I knew you before you hired a lawyer. I could have saved you a lot of money, because usually your lawyer comes to us and we do the work for them," said Grassley.

Senator Grassley also said a new executive order, which President Trump is expected to issue soon, should make things easier for Niazy and for other people in similar situations.

"They were left out of the original order that President Trump put out because it wasn't carefully drafted, so it's my understanding on the drafting of this one that they're going to make sure that people like you (Niazy) can come to this country legally and...will be able to get in. That will be pretty clear," said Grassley.

42.519887 -93.264574

Continue reading here:
Interpreter for US Military in Afghanistan Seeks Asylum in Iowa - whotv.com

Pakistan shells border with Afghanistan as tensions rise over terrorist attacks – Washington Post

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan An escalating border conflict between Afghanistan and Pakistan is threatening to undermine their cooperation on terrorism and peace talks with the Taliban as the Trump administration begins weighing its options to spur progress on both fronts.

After a blitz of terrorist bombings across Pakistan left more than 125 people dead, Pakistani forces began shelling both sides of the border Friday, aiming at camps used by a group tied to the Islamic State that claimed most of the attacks. Pakistan also closed all border crossings.

Afghanistan has protested that the shelling is forcing hundreds of villagers to flee their homes. U.S. officials have asked Pakistani military leaders to cooperate with their neighboring country in going after the militants, but Pakistan has threatened to take further unilateral action.

And in a tit-for-tat exchange of demands, Pakistan asked Afghan officials Saturday to hand over 76 alleged militants based in Afghanistan, while Afghan diplomats Sunday called for action on a list of 32 terrorist training centers and 85 militant leaders they say are in Pakistan, including the Haqqani Taliban faction that is fighting against the Afghan state.

Turmoil in Afghanistan has created space for terrorist organizations to find their foothold there, said Nafees Zakaria, a spokesman for Pakistans Foreign Affairs Ministry. He said the group responsible for the recent bombings was based in Afghanistan as far back as 2014, when it massacred 141 people at a Pakistani army school, an assault that outraged the country.

Zakaria added that other countries in the region are concerned about the growing footprint of groups like ISIS in Afghanistan. The Islamic State is also known as ISIS.

Russia in particular has been seeking a role in solving the Afghan conflict, hosting regional meetings on it and expressing support for the Taliban as an antidote to a spillover of Islamic State groups into Central Asia. That approach has alarmed U.S. military officials who urged the Trump administration to raise troop levelsin Afghanistan to block further Taliban advances.

There is plenty of irony in Pakistans finger-pointing. Afghanistan has long complained that Pakistan provides sanctuary for Taliban leaders and factions, a charge it denies. And the group most linked to last weeks bombings, Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, is an outgrowth of the Pakistani Taliban, which was driven into Afghanistan by a massive Pakistan army operation in 2015.

Once the group had relocated, some members split off and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, a radical Sunni militia. Those militants have overrun several Afghan border districts, despite repeated efforts by Afghan forces to push them out, and they have claimed the bombing of several Shiite mosques in Kabul, the Afghan capital.

Afghanistan is the victim of terrorism, not its shelter, Gen. Dawlat Waziri, a spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, declared Sunday. He called Pakistans border attacks an act of aggression and warned that if diplomatic efforts fail, Afghans will defend their soil with whatever means available. A Foreign Affairs Ministry official said Afghanistan might even seek U.N. sanctions against Pakistan for supporting terrorist groups.

Michael Kugelman, deputy director for Asian studies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, described Jamaat-ul-Ahrar as one of the Pakistani Talibans most bloodthirsty factions, with a small but brutal contingent in Afghanistan.

In Pakistan, Kugelman added, the Islamic State has been forming opportunistic partnerships with radical religious groups of all kinds, including some that officials had for political reasons been reluctant to curb. The danger, he said, is of growing collaboration between the Islamic State and high-octane local militant factions eager to latch onto its still-powerful brand.

Given the common threat this phenomenon has created for Pakistan and Afghanistan, analysts pointed out, it would seem a perfect moment for their governments to join forces , especially when they are eager to prove to the new administration in Washington that they are serious about fighting Islamist insurgents and terrorists.

Instead, years of bitter acrimony between the two Muslim neighbors has fueled an explosion of highly politicized accusations and threats, reminiscent of a decade ago when Afghanistans then-president, Hamid Karzai, used to send lists of anti-Afghan militants living openly in Pakistan to its military president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf with no result.

The growing wave of terror in both countries requires a joint approach, the News International newspaper here urged in its lead editorial Sunday. The only beneficiary of increasing tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan are terrorist groups. It is important to ensure that we, on both sides, do not resort to blame games.

Today, the stakes for both countries are high. In Afghanistan, the 16-year war with the Taliban is at a stalemate, the defense forces are demoralized and stretched thin, and the government of President Ashraf Ghani is beset by divisions and administrative paralysis.

Although the Trump administration appears likely to continue supporting the war with funds and troops, critics say the conflict cannot be settled unless the Ghani government takes decisive action to curb corruption, overcome ethnic rivalries, resume stalled election plans and mend fences with Pakistan.

In Pakistan, the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has been struggling to rein in a panoply of militant Islamist groups without arousing further violence, to maintain a balance between military and civilian power and to navigate new relations with China and other partners while preserving long-standing security ties with Washington.

Even before last weeks attacks, some influential U.S. policy experts had urged the Trump administration to sharply cut aid to Pakistan if it does not carry out a full-fledged crackdown on Islamist militants and begin playing a positive role in the effort to settle the Afghan war, rather than trying to manipulate it while providing refuge for anti-Afghan insurgents.

Davood Moradian, director of the Kabul-based Afghan Institute for Strategic Studies, said success in Afghanistan was achievable but only if three things happened.

Afghanistan has to address corruption, strengthen the armed forces and integrate the Taliban into politics, he said. Pakistan has to abandon its strategy of using terrorism as a state policy. And the United States has to assure its allies and adversaries in both countries that it is determined to prevail.

Read more

Did Pakistani security agents kidnap bloggers to make a point?

U.N. says civilian toll in Afghanistan is highest in years

Afghans hope and worry that Trump will shake things up

Todays coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Here is the original post:
Pakistan shells border with Afghanistan as tensions rise over terrorist attacks - Washington Post

Afghanistan lose 5 for 5 to mess up 130 chase – ESPNcricinfo.com

Zimbabwe v Afghanistan, 3rd ODI, Harare February 21, 2017

ESPNcricinfo staff

Zimbabwe 129 (Musakanda 60, Naib 4-27, Rashid 3-29) beat Afghanistan 126 (Stanikzai 31, Williams 3-15, Mpofu 3-24, Chatara 3-30) by three runs Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

File photo - Chris Mpofu set in motion a stunning comeback from Zimbabwe with two wickets in the 27th over Getty Images

Harare Sports Club. Afghanistan are cantering towards a target of 130. They need 16 runs more, off 24 overs, with five wickets in hand, to win a third successive ODI series against Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe have never defended so low a total in one-day internationals. The match is in the bag, right? Enter Chris Mpofu. Add some handy work from wicketkeeper Peter Moor, vital spin support from Sean Williams, and rash batting from Afghanistan's middle and lower order, and what you have is an unbelievable three-run win for Zimbabwe.

When Mpofu began the 27th over, it hardly seemed like the match was turning so dramatically. Mohammad Nabi, who was still new to the crease, dispatched the first ball of the over, a length delivery, over long-off for six. He took a single next ball, and the well-set Samiullah Shenwari was back on strike. Afghanistan needed nine. Shenwari went after a short, wide one, and under-edged; the ball was dying on keeper Moor, but he dived forward and held on. The very next ball, new man Najibullah Zadran's shot selection was suspect - he tried to pull a short one from outside off - and top edged. Moor held on again.

Six needed off 23 overs, three wickets in hand. Left-arm spinner Williams, bowling his fifth over, tossed it up on middle and Nabi missed the cut. Bowled. Williams sent down a maiden. The very first ball of the next over, the Mpofu-Moor pairing was at it again. This time it was a short ball angling down leg, which Rashid Khan edged to be caught behind. Another wicket maiden and it was back to Williams. No. 10 Amir Hamza managed to get two off the first ball, Graeme Cremer misfielding amid all the tension. He kept out the next one, but could not hold himself back off the third ball; a big swing at a delivery tossed up on off ended in the hands of Richard Ngarava at point. Zimbabwe had won by three runs, keeping the series alive. To complete their first ever ODI series victory against a spirited Afghanistan side, they will have to win the next two games too, on February 24 and 26.

Zimbabwe had little to cheer after choosing to bat. The only real contribution of note came from Tarisai Musakanda, who scored 60 out of their total of 129. Only one other batsmen - Malcolm Waller, who finished unbeaten on 36 - made it past 10 as the home side imploded in 32.4 overs. Much of the damage was done by the medium pace of Gulbadin Naib and the legspin of Rashid Khan, who must have still been in a happy daze from his success at the IPL auction. He was also on a hat-trick at one point in this match.

When the players broke for lunch, Afghanistan were comfortable at 63 for 3 in 13 overs with captain Asghar Stanikzai and Shenwari at the crease. New-ball bowler Tendai Chatara got Stanikzai soon after the interval, though - another catch to keeper Moor - helping Zimbabwe take a step in the direction of one of the most stunning comebacks.

ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Read this article:
Afghanistan lose 5 for 5 to mess up 130 chase - ESPNcricinfo.com

De Maiziere and German states bicker over deportations to Afghanistan – Deutsche Welle

German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere criticized German states that refuse to deport rejected Afghan asylum seekers in an interview on public broadcaster "ARD" onMonday night. He said that the states had neglected to address the topic at a recent meeting. The German government's stance, one contested by several states, is that parts of Afghanistan are sufficiently safe to send people back there.

"Back then, the states said that they weren't experts on foreign policy," de Maiziere said. "They said that they wanted and had to rely on the national government to evaluate certain countries." De Maiziere criticized Schleswig-Holstein specifically for refusing to follow the national government's guidelines without talking to him first.

Germany's most northern statehad declared last week that it would stop all deportations to Afghanistan for three months - the maximum amount of time states are allowed to halt deportations without Berlin's permission.

Afghanistan: safe or not?

A young boy carries a sign saying 'Afghanistan is not safe!' at a demonstration against deportations on February 11

In Germany, there has been a tense debate over whether rejected asylum seekers should be deported to Afghanistan. The federal German administration has come under fire including from its own human rights commissioner because it considers parts of Afghanistan safe even though much of thecountry iscaught in battles between Taliban fighters and state troops, and terror attacks are frequent.

De Maiziere defended the national government's stance on Afghanistan. "We know of course that the safety situation is complicated, but there are safe areas," he told ARD's evening news show "Tagesthemen,"saying that the north of the country and capital Kabul were relatively peaceful.

Stefan Studt, the interior minister for Schleswig-Holstein, criticized this stance in an interview on the same program on Monday. "If Mr. de Maiziere says that there are safe regions [in Afghanistan] and I ask him where these are, and he does not give me a precise answer, then I cannot see how it's supposed to be safe there."

Stefan Studt said De Maiziere could not specify what regions of Afghanistan were safe

Schleswig-Holstein said its decision to halt deportations was based on a December 2016 report from the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR), which found that the security situation in Afghanistan had significantly worsened throughout 2016 and that "no differentiation between 'safe' and 'unsafe' territories" was possible.

Five German states halted deportations

Since Berlin came to an agreement with the Kabul administration last October, allowing group deportations via chartered flights,Germany has deported a total of 59 rejected Afghanasylum seekers.

Five German states have refused to deport rejected asylum seekers to the country(mostly with the exemption of those who have a criminial record). The 11 remaining states deport Afghans, though most have some imposed restrictions -refusing for example to deport children, women or families.

There is a total of over 200,000 foreigners obligated to leave the country currently living in Germany, though roughly 150,000 of those deportation orders have been temporarily suspended.

mb/msh (AFP, dpa, epd, KNA)

Visit link:
De Maiziere and German states bicker over deportations to Afghanistan - Deutsche Welle