Archive for the ‘Afghanistan’ Category

U.S. ‘Virtually Never Held Anyone Accountable’ for Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan War, Former White House Official Says – PBS

One night in October 2009, Mohammad Aalem was at home in Afghanistans Wardak province with his children and two brothers.

What Aalem says happened next is burned into his memory: U.S. forces blew up the gate to his home and began firing. It was one of the controversial night raids that would become a hallmark of Americas counterinsurgency efforts in Afghanistan.

My brother was sleeping in his bed with his children, Aalem, a taxi driver, tells correspondent Martin Smith about his brother, a police officer, in the above excerpt from Part Two of America and the Taliban. When he opened the [bedroom] door, they instantly killed him.

Pointing to his cheek, one shoulder, his chest and then the other shoulder, Aalem says of his brothers death, They shot him here and over here and here. They shot him in all these places.

Wardak province was a hotbed of Taliban activity at the time.That night, in his guest house, there were guests, Aalem says: I dont know if they were [Taliban]. We are people from rural Afghanistan. If anyone comes, we give them food.

But neither he nor his brothers were Taliban, Aalem says.

Aalems story unfolds in Part Two of America and the Taliban, which premiered Tuesday, April 11, 2023, on PBS and online. Over the course of the series, award-winning producers Marcela Gaviria and Martin Smith chronicle how what began in the wake of the 9/11 attacks as an effort to eliminate Al Qaeda and eliminate its ruling ally, the Taliban, became Americas longest war, with nearly 50,000 Afghan civilians, almost 70,000 members of the Afghan national military and police forces, and approximately 2,400 American service members killed and how it ended in defeat in August 2021 with U.S. troops withdrawing, the Western-backed government collapsing, and the Taliban once again in control.

Part Two of America and the Taliban focuses on how the war effort, which started under George W. Bush, played out during Barack Obamas presidency. In reporting the documentary, Smith found that Aalem was not alone in his experience and that a pattern of Afghan civilian casualties incurred during raids and other errant attacks severely undercut the U.S. militarys effort to win hearts and minds in the country, including that of Afghan leadership.

President Karzai increasingly became bitter, Omar Zakhikwal, a former minister in then-Afghan President Hamid Karzais government, tells Smith. The raiding of houses and night raids he was strictly opposed to. But the thing that particularly annoyed President Karzai was the killing of civilians. And it repeatedly happened.

Retired Gen. David Petraeus, commander of U.S. Central Command from 2008-10 and of U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan in 2010-11, apologized directly to Karzai after an airstrike killed nine children. In the above excerpt, Smith presses Petraeus on Afghan civilians killed or injured during raids and other operations by U.S. and coalition forces.

The accumulation of civilian casualties mistakes, all mistakes, to be clear I mean, we were very, very tough, says Petraeus, who made efforts to reduce civilian casualties. War is full of mistakes. Full of incredible loss, tragedy, heartbreak, hardship and casualties.

Retired Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, a deputy national security advisor from 2007-13, tells Smith the U.S. response to Afghan civilian casualties was lacking.

We virtually never held anyone accountable for civilian casualties, Lute says in the above excerpt. I mean, we paid condolences and sometimes we said, It wasnt us. Or, Sorry, its a mistake. But we never held anybody accountable.

We virtually never held anyone accountable for civilian casualties. I mean, we paid condolences and sometimes we said, It wasnt us. Or, Sorry, its a mistake. But we never held anybody accountable.

- former deputy national security adviser and retired Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute

In the documentary, retired Army Lt. Col. Jason Dempsey, who served two rotations in Afghanistan, tells FRONTLINE the peace offerings the U.S. often made to Afghans whose family members were killed in errant strikes werent enough to stem the badwill.

They held those grudges and they did accumulate over time, not only in an individual action, but in the narratives our enemies were building about us being indiscriminate killers, Dempsey says. You know, our failure rate, if its 1, 2% out of hundreds and thousands of strikes per year, you can build a hell of a lot of stories about the evil Americans if youre screwing up 2%, and I guarantee we were screwing up more than that.

As for Aalem, he says that after his brother was killed, their house was then set on fire and he was taken to Bagram prison with another brother. He spent four years there and, he says, was never charged with any crime.

The experience turned him against the Americans. He says that after his release, he contemplated carrying out a suicide attack, but chose not to because I have young children. I didnt do it because I had to support my family.

As seen in the excerpt, to this day, Aalem gets choked up when talking about his brothers death at one point pausing the interview and leaving the room.

He wants to keep his brothers memory alive.They killed my brother, Aalem says. He was a police officer, a good one. He was on active duty, and on that night he had come home.

For the full story on how the U.S. lost the 20-year war in Afghanistan, watch America and the Taliban. Parts One and Two of the three-part series are available to stream now on FRONTLINEs YouTube channel, at pbs.org/frontline and in the PBS Video App:

Part Three airs Tuesday, April 25 at 10/9c on PBS stations (check local listings) and on FRONTLINEs YouTube channel, and will also be available to stream starting at 7/6c at pbs.org/frontline and in the PBS Video App. America and the Taliban is a FRONTLINE production with RAIN Media, Inc. The producers are Brian Funck, Marcela Gaviria and Martin Smith. The writers and directors are Marcela Gaviria and Martin Smith. The correspondent is Martin Smith. The co-producer is Scott Anger. The executive producer and editor-in-chief for FRONTLINE is Raney Aronson-Rath.

This story has been updated.

Read more from the original source:
U.S. 'Virtually Never Held Anyone Accountable' for Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan War, Former White House Official Says - PBS

Queen Elizabeth Wanted Prince William to Fight in Afghanistan Like Harry – The Daily Beast

Queen Elizabeth II wanted both William and Harry to see active service fighting alongside other British soldiers in Afghanistan, but it was decided that it was too risky to send the second-in-line to the throne, a former head of the Army has said.

Although Harry and William both wanted to fight, the revelation that William was kept safe seems likely to fuel the sense that William was consistently given preferential treatment to Harry by the institution due to his position in the hierarchy, a key claim of Harrys book, Spare, which described William having a bigger bedroom and better furniture than him when they were children.

The revelation of the queens thoughts on the matter was made by the former head of the British army, General Sir Mike Jackson, in a new TV documentary.

Jackson said Elizabeth expressed her view that both her grandsons should fight, saying that she told him at a meeting: My grandsons have taken my shilling, therefore they must do their duty.

But, Jackson said, It was decided that William as heir to the heir, the risk is too great. But for his younger brother, the risk was acceptable.

Jackson made the comments in a new ITV documentary entitled The Real Crown, according to reports in British media including the Daily Mail and the Telegraph.

What goes on in those audiences and who says what to whom remains for the two people involved, and I will break the rule about not divulging what goes on on this one occasion, Jackson is quoted saying in the documentary.

Jackson said: William was very keen to go. Unequivocally. But it was complex, and some very great minds and experienced people took a view on it.

Harry undertook two tours of Afghanistan. William put his military training to use flying rescue helicopters.

In Spare, Harry said he killed 25 Taliban fighters, and that he was dehumanized by his training to see them as chess pieces removed from the board.

More:
Queen Elizabeth Wanted Prince William to Fight in Afghanistan Like Harry - The Daily Beast

Under the Taliban, None of Afghanistan’s Children Can Really Learn – The Diplomat

Advertisement

570 days since the Taliban banned teenage girls from school. Education is not a privilege, its a human right; a right Afghan women and girls continue to be denied #LetAfghanGirlsLearn, tweeted Yalda Hakim of the BBC on April 13.

Like Hakim, many human rights, women rights and education rights activists across the globe have been counting the days that Afghan girls have been deprived from education, hoping for the day when school doors will be open again for all Afghan girls.

However, what will girls learn at school when they return? A recent report from Afghan newspaper Hasht-e Subh paints a dark picture of what boys at schools are currently learning:

After the Doha agreement between the U.S. and the Taliban in 2020, the Taliban started to revise the school curriculum. In this process, Pashto and some Dari textbooks have been used, which include 45 elementary school textbooks, 48 secondary school textbooks, and 43 high school textbooks. The Taliban have evaluated the textbooks by a board they call technical, assuming that the previous government was a puppet. According to the Taliban, since the curriculum was compiled and issued by the Republic with the financial assistance of foreign countries, some non-Islamic and non-Afghan standards similar to the western world have been included in it. In the introduction, they admit that the curriculum of the past 20 years has an Islamic appearance, but ugly superstitions have skillfully been included in it under the title of Islam. By ugly and superstitious, they mean democracy, equality, womens rights, civil liberties, tolerance, mutual acceptance, non-violent measures and other values that are not compatible with their own ideology.

Get briefed on the story of the week, and developing stories to watch across the Asia-Pacific.

The report added that the Taliban have not revealed the identities, academic backgrounds and scientific qualifications of the board members [responsible for evaluating textbooks]. But from the content of the report, it can be understood that there was no place for education specialists and pedagogy experts in the composition of the board.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Instead, Hasht-e Subh noted that the Talibans goal in overhauling the education curriculum is to strengthen the ideology of the Taliban among the future generations This is why the changes proposed by the Taliban are very extensive.

This attitude toward education is why no one in my family currently attends school none of my brothers or sisters.

I remember very well what they were teaching and forced students to learn at school in the last period of Taliban in 1990, my father said. They were trying to brainwash people. I dont want my children study the Talibans curriculum. I want my children get educated and empowered to serve to our nation and humanity.

The Taliban claimed that they changed, but they never did, he added. They want to take time back and do everything like that period.

As an example, one of the main goals of changing the curriculum, according to the Taliban, is to replace the extremist views of the Taliban in the textbooks. As part of that, the Taliban have demanded an end to the emphasis on peace in the previous curriculum, and a rehabilitation of the Talibans real jihad against the United States, among others. Under the Taliban curriculum, children are encouraged to fight instead of financial and human losses of past wars, the religious and worldly benefits of past jihads should be explained in the curriculum.

But my father does not want his children learning to embrace violence. He believes that the ideology of the Taliban is against our religion and culture.

Islam teaches us to do not offend people with our tongues, our hands, and our works. Killing people is an unforgivable crime. If in Afghanistan my children cannot go to school forever, that is okay, but I dont want that my children learn how to commit suicide or be proud of being killers and humiliating and discriminating against other people.

In addition to teaching violence, the Taliban have removed all topics related to human freedoms in school curriculum, Hasht-e Subh notes. The Taliban have said that the standards of human rights in the education curriculum should be explained only from the perspective of the Talibans religious interpretation. The new curriculum instead emphasizes Shariah and the evils of democratic elections.

The issue of womens rights, and depictions of women taking part freely in society, was another major concern for the Taliban. From the Hasht-e Subh report:

In two cases, members of this committee read stories in the textbooks that encourage women to leave the house; they emphasize that the necessity of going out fully covered should be emphasized in the same lessons. Regarding womens work in schools, hospitals, factories and government offices, the Taliban have said that the limits of womens work conditions for education should be defined from an Islamic point of view The fact is that according to the Taliban, women cannot work in any of these places

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

My father expressed his anger against the Talibans claim that their restrictions on women are an essential part of Islam. The first wife of our Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), Bibi Khadija, was a business woman. Bibi Aisha also was dealing with politics even she participated and led in war, he pointed out. However today, after 15 centuries, the Taliban claim that Islam bans women from working.

We follow Islam. not the Taliban ideologies. So my daughters have the right to study and work in any major they are interested in. There must not be any restriction on my daughters and all Afghan women.

Today, it has been nearly two years since any of my siblings have been to school. During that time, my sister and I have been teaching my younger brother and sister using old textbooks; along with this we are looking for opportunities to study online. I believe there are thousands of families who think like my father, and thousands more children including boys being kept out of public school to avoid the Talibans brainwashing.

The Taliban paralyzed the education system during their previous period of rule, when they also dealt with the curriculum in an ideological way. And the practice of putting ideological propaganda in Afghan textbooks was strong even before the Taliban. During the civil war, the school curriculum was compiled with the help of international institutions and Mujahideen. Its main goal was to promote jihadism and antagonism. This included students being taught to count numbers with images of bullets, weapons, and other tools of war.

It remains to be seen whether international donors will work with the Taliban this time to develop a curriculum in which hate and hostility are propagated. But it seems that due to 20 years of living in relatively democratic conditions and the media revolution, the young generation of Afghanistan will not easily reconcile with an extremist ideological curriculum.

Read the original here:
Under the Taliban, None of Afghanistan's Children Can Really Learn - The Diplomat

Special Representative for Afghanistan West’s April 11 – 18 Travel to … – Department of State

');});jQuery('.entry-content p.watermarked > div.watermarked_image > img').each( function() {if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignnone') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignnone' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignleft') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignleft' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignright') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignright' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('size-medium') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'has-size-medium' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('aligncenter') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'aligncenter' );jQuery(this).parent().children().wrapAll('');}});}});});

In Doha, Special Representative for Afghanistan (SRA) Thomas West will meet with Qatari colleagues, Afghan civil society leaders, and partner missions. In the UAE, SRA West will meet withEmiraticounterparts, Afghan business and thought leaders. In Istanbul, he will hold consultations with Afghan political leaders, journalists, humanitarian professionals and human rights activists.

SRA West is conducting outreach in the region to secure input as the international community seeks solutions to Afghanistans compounding challenges, made worse by the Talibans recent decisions to limit womens participation in humanitarian operations and ban them from their vital work for the UN.

The rest is here:
Special Representative for Afghanistan West's April 11 - 18 Travel to ... - Department of State

After Action Review on Afghanistan – United States Department of … – Department of State

');});jQuery('.entry-content p.watermarked > div.watermarked_image > img').each( function() {if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignnone') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignnone' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignleft') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignleft' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignright') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignright' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('size-medium') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'has-size-medium' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('aligncenter') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'aligncenter' );jQuery(this).parent().children().wrapAll('');}});}});});

In December of 2021, I asked Ambassador Dan Smith to lead an After Action Review of the Department of States execution of its duties related to ending the U.S. military mission in Afghanistan. The After Action Review covers the period from January 2020 to the end of August 2021 and the completion of the U.S. military withdrawal. I directed this review because I believe we have an obligation to our workforce, our institution, our partners in Congress, and the American people to learn from the lessons of this chapter in U.S. foreign policy.

The After Action Review, which we are now making available to relevant Congressional committees, produced a series of findings on how the Department planned for and carried out its missions during this period. It also provided detailed recommendations that we are already taking steps to implement. These include strengthening the Departments overall contingency planning, crisis preparedness, and response capabilities.

The State Departments greatest asset is its people, including an extraordinary group of dedicated and talented professionals who worked tirelessly on the ground in Kabul, in Washington, and at other sites domestically and abroad to evacuate and assist as many people as possible during that period. Their efforts, and the efforts of all from our Department who served in Afghanistan over two decades as well our Afghan partners who served alongside them, deserve our highest praise and gratitude, and we continue to honor them through our work going forward.

More here:
After Action Review on Afghanistan - United States Department of ... - Department of State