Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

Alt-Right Activists Thrust Silicon Valley Into Debate on Hate Speech … – NBCNews.com

Even as it wrestles with its own diversity issues, Silicon Valley has become the reluctant arbiter of the line where free speech crosses into hate speech in the wake of the deadly protests in Charlottesville.

In an age where a lack of condemnation is tantamount to complicity, experts say tech firms have no choice but to disassociate from the alt-right, although as a growing number of tech companies cut off white nationalist groups from the platforms they use for communication, commerce, and content distribution, some have criticized the response as too little, too late.

Theres a very intimate history between internet service providers and white supremacist groups, said Joan Donovan, media manipulation research lead at the Data & Society Research Institute. There was plenty of warning that this stuff was being coordinated in their spaces, she said, but tech companies initially resisted policing the activity.

Historically, Silicon Valley has presented itself on embracing diversity in all its forms, albeit for pragmatic rather than political reasons: Cutthroat competition for users and talent means that companies cant afford to be exclusionary.

The reason this is a heightened issue in technology is technology is much more heterogeneous its all over the world, said Dave Carvajal, CEO of a technology-focused recruiting firm.

Its this belief people have that the tech industry should be the most modern, the most cutting edge, said Brian Kropp, HR Practice Leader at CEB (now Gartner). It also has this promise of capturing what tomorrow is going to be like.

But putting these egalitarian principles into practice hasnt always been easy. Even before Charlottesville, companies have stumbled in the gap between bro culture and Silicon Valleys self-image of open-mindedness.

Ubers ouster of CEO Travis Kalanick shone an embarrassing spotlight on the ingrained misogyny at some firms, and Googles recent firing of engineer James Damore, who argued in a widely distributed memo that women are biologically less well-suited for tech jobs, triggered accusations that the search giant is intolerant of conservative views.

I think whats happening is a lot of these kinds of deep-rooted issues are being brought to the surface because of the political theater thats happening right now. Its stirring up a lot of this, Carvajal said.

The violence at a white nationalist rally that left one counter-protester dead and others injured has brought this tension into sharper focus.

Theyve been pushing very hard on many of these issues. Now theyre at a point where they have to make really hard decisions... whether or not they stand up to all the values theyve talked about and promoted, Kropp said.

Some tech firms have been more receptive to curtailing alt-right activity than others, said Rashad Robinson, executive director of advocacy group Color of Change.

A lot of them seem super-focused on terms of services and this idea of an open platform, he said. We hear things like they share our values but at this time theres not going to be an update to policy.

Some of the challenges are logistical rather than ideological, since much of the enforcement cant be automated. It takes humans making judgement calls, and the line between talk and action online isnt always clear. There hasnt been a good model so far for policy around how to monitor or prevent certain amounts of content, Donovan said.

Tech companies also dont want to alienate potential customers or trigger a public relations backlash. According to Ted Marzilli, CEO of YouGov BrandIndex, consumer sentiment metrics for Facebook, Apple and GoDaddy reflected little change this week. Theyre not getting a lot of credit from consumers, but theyre not being punished, either, he said.

This could embolden other Silicon Valley leaders to terminate alt-right and white nationalist business relationships, Marzilli said, even if it costs them. These things are always a bit risky for companies from the perspective of dollars and cents, he said.

Whether driven by a sense of moral obligation, concern about public perception or some combination of the two, last weekends violence seemed to be a wake-up call, Robinson said. Its certainly accelerated since Charlottesville, he said of companies willingness to cut ties with white nationalist groups.

They started to think about their role in promoting this kind of talk, Donovan said. One thing these platforms really understand about themselves is they dont just allow speech to flow, they do the job of coordinating action They saw that this kind of open unmoderated speech online produced violent effects.

Follow this link:
Alt-Right Activists Thrust Silicon Valley Into Debate on Hate Speech ... - NBCNews.com

Berkeley Braces for Upcoming ‘Alt-Right’ Rallies, Speeches – NBC Bay Area

WATCH LIVE

The city of Berkeley once again is gearing up for what could be another showdown between the right and left with rallies this weekend and in September, including a possible appearance by conservative speaker Milo Yiannopoulos. (Published Monday, Aug. 21, 2017)

The city of Berkeley once again is gearing up for what could be another showdown between the right and left with rallies this weekend and in September, including a possible appearance by conservative speaker Milo Yiannopoulos.

The rallies will focus on free speech, and while city and UC Berkeley leaders are not welcoming hate speech, they are allowing the rallies in the name of the First Amendment.

Congresswoman Barbara Lee and other city and county leaders are expected to speak Tuesday morning at Berkeley City Hall to make it clear to hate groups that they are not welcome in the city.

So-called alt-right ralliers plan to demonstrate on Berkeley's streets this weekend, and residents are concerned about violence and destruction similar to what occurred in February, before a planned Yiannopoulos speech was canceled.

"They're not alt-right; they're Nazis," resident Taye Taye said. "They're racists. They're not welcome."

UC Berkeley students also are concerned about what will happen this weekend and in September, when Yiannopoulos and other controversial alt-right speakers say they will be on campus.

"There is such a thing as too far left and too far right, so i think it's going to be a little dangerous around campus during that time," student Cindy Kreck said.

Still, the university says it will allow all speech on campus, even if it's filled with hate.

"We contest speech that we don't like with more speech, and the best disinfectant is sunlight," UC Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof said.

Mogulof said the school will spend a lot of money on security to keep people safe.

Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin said the alt-right groups expected this weekend are not welcome but they will not be turned away if they remain peaceful.

"We as a community stand for free speech," Arreguin said. "We are the birthplace of the free speech movement, and we really can't dictate based on the content of the speech."

Published at 5:01 PM PDT on Aug 21, 2017 | Updated at 8:58 PM PDT on Aug 21, 2017

Read more:
Berkeley Braces for Upcoming 'Alt-Right' Rallies, Speeches - NBC Bay Area

Aug. 21 Letters: Start calling the ‘alt-right’ what they are – The Mercury News

Stop saying alt-right. Call them what they are:racists, Nazis,whitesupremacists, vile and divisive people. We cannot soften hate.

The good news isDonald Trumphas finally shown us his true colors. The bad news is he has shown us his true colors.There is no morality in his soul.In spite of growing up during the civil rights movement, when people died in sit-ins and marches, he found no moral high ground in that fight.

We need to speak the truth about Charlottesville and theracists, neo-Nazis and white supremacists coming to San Francisco and Berkeley this month. We need to be there to show our support for good, equality and justice. And we need to call them what they are.

Nanci Viera San Jose

As someone who has served in U.S. Army and studied military history all my life, I cannot let someone write something so ridiculous defending Gen. Robert E. Lee (Letters, Aug. 17). Like Germanys Gen. Erwin Rommel, Lee led armies that imposed racist and murderous war. Neither deserves to be treated with honor.

Vic DiEleanora San Bruno

I did not find President Trumps comments at all offensive.Trump was right on assigning blame to both sides.He strongly condemnedviolence, and he was wise to wait until he had all the facts before calling outby name. He is absolutely for law and order.

Why do people and news continually bash Trump? Why keep opposing the will of the people? What is placing the country in grave danger is not Trump, but it is the likes of people such as Rep Jackie Speier, the Bay Area Democratand others who portray him as unfit for office.

Deanna Method Campbell

Removing Confederate statues does not erase history and does not promote understanding or learning of our U.S. history. It would be more beneficial to place historical perspective statements on each statue to explain, for example, that Gen. Robert E. Lee was a great soldier, etc., however, he fought against the unity of the United States. President George Washington was also a slave owner. There are good and bad sides to each person, living and dead. Why not turn a newly ripened urge to rid our country of Confederate statues into a positive, educational enlightenment of our historical figures for all to understand in accordance to todays thinking. It would also save money and probably lives.

Mimi McDonald San Jose

Just as Mel Cottons sign will live on with History San Jose,,so should Confederate statues live on in a national, designatedmonument/museum dedicated to slavery, the Civil War, and the civil rights movement. The United States Holocaust MemorialMuseum need not stand alone. Lets add to it the United StatesNational Slavery Museum. (And, if we want to take it one step further, how about a United States Indigenous Peoples Memorial Museum also?)

Jeannette Schreiber San Jose

Concerning the traitor leaders of the Confederacy and the treasonous image of the Confederate flag, people should also look at the American flag and the patriots that formed this country in the same way. Both tried to break away/secede from a country that they did not feel reflected their values, right or wrong. The difference is that the colonists won their war. To the victor belongs the spoils. Its easy to pass judgment hundreds of years later.

Tom Simpson San Jose

Donald Trump has hastily accused those interested in removing Confederate monuments as revisionist intending to change history. He fails, again, to take responsibility for his many blatant attempts to eradicate President Obamas legacy, and to have lead the effort to delegitimize the birth of President Obama.The arrogance and shamelessness of Trump is beyond outrageous. It is criminal.

Blanca Alvarado Former member, Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors

Californias SB 10 is a morally right piece of bail reform legislation that will keep citizens safe and create a more equitable justice system that ensures everyone has access to justice and freedom. We cannot continue with the present system where more than 60 percent of people in jail are awaiting trial, costing taxpayers more than $5 million a day.

Vida Moattar Larkspur

More:
Aug. 21 Letters: Start calling the 'alt-right' what they are - The Mercury News

Poll finds 10 percent of Americans support the ‘alt-right’ – Death and Taxes

A Washington Post-ABC News poll found that roughly one in ten Americans support the alt-right and nine percent find it acceptable to hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views. Those numbers are a bit higher than you would like, as ideally they would be hovering somewhere around zero.

The poll, conducted after the deadly Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville,explicitly asked, Thinking now about the movement known as the alt-right Would you describe yourself as a supporter or an opponent of the alt-right movement?

Ten percent of respondents marked themselves down as supporters of the movement, although only four of that 10 percent said they strongly support the alt-right, while the other six only somewhat support it. Well, as long as you only kind of agree with the racists I suppose thats OK. But another issue is that a large chunk of those surveyed dont seem to realize that the alt-right is filled with white supremacists.

When asked, As far as you know, do you think the alt-right does or does not hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views? 21 percent said it doesnt and 39 percent said they had no opinion, even thought this is not really a matter of opinion.

People have argued about this question, but lets be very clear here. The man who coined the term alt-right is Richard Spencer. Spencer is a white nationalist who wants to create a white ethno state. He claims he wants to do so peacefully, but theres no way to do that and everybody knows it. In addition to that, you have self-identified members of the alt-right marching around with tiki torches, chanting Jews will not replace us, and rallying in support of Confederate monuments. The man accused of murdering Heather Heyer in Charolottesville marched with National Vanguard, an explicitly white supremacist group that loves the phrase blood and soil. Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer counts himself and his followers as alt-right.

This is white supremacy, plain and simple.

[Washington Post | Photo: Getty]

Go here to read the rest:
Poll finds 10 percent of Americans support the 'alt-right' - Death and Taxes

Trudy Rubin: Alt-right mentality in White House responsible for Trump’s moral failure – Chippewa Herald

Who could imagine a president would act as an enabler of neo-Nazis and Ku Klux Klansmen?

President Donald Trumps refusal to unequivocally condemn the white supremacists at Charlottesville has thrilled these awful fringe groups. Thank you President Trump for your honesty & courage, tweeted David Duke, the notorious ex-Klan leader, whose support the president famously refused to denounce last year. No condemnation at all ... God bless him, exulted the neo-Nazi Daily Stormer.

Trumps insistence that both sides Nazis and anti-Nazis, Klansmen and anti-Klansmen were equally responsible for the Charlottesville violence is not only morally bankrupt but will inspire these hate groups to more violence. They were mostly dormant fringe outfits until the Trumpsters awoke them with their dog whistles.

Still, how could a president whose daughter and son-in-law are Jewish embolden thugs who chanted Blood and soil and Jews will not replace us?

For the answer, look no further than the White House, where a coterie of Trump aides have provided their boss with a nationalist, populist ideology designed to win disaffected white voters. If that means ignoring or quietly cultivating the support of white supremacists and other radical right extremists, well, never mind.

Lets begin with Steve Bannon, Trumps recently ousted chief strategist, who was formerly the head of the incendiary web news site Breitbart. Bannon, a verbal bomb-throwing populist, famously described his news operation as the platform for the alt-right. Now he has brought the alt-right into the White House.

The alt-right is shorthand for a loose network of individuals and groups that seek a version of conservatism that often endorses racism, anti-semitism, and white supremacy whether implicitly or explicitly. The president often reads or retweets comments from conspiratorial alt-right websites and blogs.

Bannon holds an apocalyptic view of history, believing Western civilization is in decline and can only be revived by a return to uber-nationalism along with religion and traditional values. He denies he is a racist, but has admitted that his views may be endorsed by fringe groups. He has also made clear that this is an unfortunate necessity that doesnt bother him.

This Machiavellian was invited to head Trumps campaign after it hit a nadir in August 2016. He devised an ugly, nationalist strategy that stressed race, immigration, and white identity politics, while branding anyone who opposed these themes as the enemy.

Call it the politics of anger, as described in fascinating detail in Joshua Greens new book Devils Bargain: Steve Bannon, Donald Trump and the Storming of the Presidency. With his uncanny ability to channel Trumps ugliest instincts, Bannon had fueled Trumps knee-jerk haste to attack those who oppose him and minimize any sins of extremist supporters. The New York Times reported that Bannon had cautioned the president not to criticize far-right activists too severely lest he antagonize a key piece of his base.

Yet Bannon was not the only White House booster of alt-right values. Its hard to envision any previous president tolerating an aide such as Sebastian Gorka, who is Trumps frequent frontman on TV talk shows (his aggressive performance reportedly delights the president).

Gorka is supposed to be a counterterrorism expert, but his academic credentials are dubious. A native of Hungary, he had ties there with far-right and anti-Semitic groups and public figures, according to an investigation by the Jewish weekly The Forward. He wears the medal of Vitezi Rend, a onetime pro-Nazi organization. Gorka claims to wear the medal in honor of his father, but thats like saying one wears a swastika to honor daddy.

Gorka, too, has survived rumors that he was about to be fired.

The alt-right apologists in the White House have been at war with the saner members of Team Trump such as the national security adviser, Gen. H.R. McMaster. Bannon is suspected of backing an ugly web and Twitter campaign urging that Trump fire McMaster. (Trump tweeted support of the general.) The latest chapter in this battle helps explain the mindset behind Trumps moral blindness in Charlottesville.

McMaster recently fired an NSC staffer named Rich Higgins for writing a seven-page memo that darkly described a conspiracy to oust Trump by cultural Marxists a group that lumps together anti-racist groups, the Muslim Brotherhood, the media, globalists, international bankers, and the GOP establishment. The memo urges Trump to fight back against members of this conspiracy. According to Foreign Policy, Trump gushed over the memo when he saw it, and was later furious when he found out Higgins had been fired.

The memo exemplifies the Trump mindset: Fight your enemies and hold supporters close, even if some of them are distasteful.

In the end, the amoral Trump appears driven less by ideology (though ousting Bannon and Gorka would remove key enablers). His main concern is whether he thinks a group is for him or against him.

In Charlottesville, the Klan and the Nazis were singing Trumps praises. So he had to avoid any unequivocal denunciation of their role.

Trudy Rubin is a columnist and editorial-board member for the Philadelphia Inquirer. Readers may write to her at: Philadelphia Inquirer, P.O. Box 8263, Philadelphia, Pa. 19101, or by email at trubin@phillynews.com.

Read more:
Trudy Rubin: Alt-right mentality in White House responsible for Trump's moral failure - Chippewa Herald