Mediaboss Marketing

At their annual meeting, Southern Baptists agreed to a statement decrying "every form of racism, including alt-right white supremacy, as antithetical to the Gospel of Jesus Christ."

Denominational leaders had planned not to vote on a resolution about race relations, but reversed course following an outcry on the floor of the convention the day before. Leaders worked through the night to craft an updated resolution after the original text failed to gain traction on the first day of the convention.

Members of the Southern Baptist Convention, a coalition of churches that comprise the nation's largest Protestant denomination, convene just once a year to discuss church business, make budget decisions, commission new missionaries and vote on "resolutions" that affirm their theological, social or political priorities. A Resolutions Committee chooses what topics will be formally voted upon before the meeting. This year's list of approved resolutions, for example, included a call to defund Planned Parenthood, a rebuke of gambling and an affirmation that morality is important for political leaders.

Race relations are an extremely sensitive issue within the Southern Baptist Convention. The denomination was founded in 1845, when it split from other Baptists who opposed slavery. The denomination did not formally rebuke its past until 1995, when Southern Baptists voted to repent and apologize for their history of racism, support of slavery and failure to stand firmly in opposition to white supremacy. The body did not elect its first black president of the convention until 2012; the first black president of its annual pastor's conference began his term of service this year. Like the nation's population as a whole, the American Church is becoming less white, a demographic shift that has led many denominations to ensure they put more emphasis on diversity in leadership and make worshippers of color feel welcome in their sanctuaries.

McKissic's resolution, however, had been rejected by the convention's Resolutions Committee before the meeting. It would not receive a vote unless it was forced by the will of the convention attendees -- called "messengers" -- from the floor.

On Tuesday afternoon, McKissic stood to introduce his resolution and ask why it was rejected. Barrett Duke, chairman of the Committee on Resolutions, said that it had been rejected because it "was not well-written" and included "inappropriate" language.

McKissic called for the body to instruct the committee to reconsider, which would require a two-thirds majority. It failed.

Few messengers had seen the actual resolution and many expressed confusions about what, exactly "the alt-right" was. Still, the rejection set off alarm bells among many pastors at the convention who couldn't believe their denomination might fail to stand against new manifestations of racism and chose not to act.

After the vote on whether to consider McKissic's resolution failed, Rev. Garrett Kell, the lead pastor of Del Ray Baptist Church in Virginia, who is white, approached a microphone and addressed SBC president, Rev. Steve Gaines.

"This may show my ignorance, sir, because I don't know how this works," Kell said. "But I would hate for us to leave here today with confusion about where the Southern Baptist convention stands on the alt-right."

Kell was told that the messengers would need to agree to re-open the Resolutions Committee process, which seemed unlikely.

Meanwhile, McKissic was incensed. He walked through the crowded convention hall and demanded a meeting with the convention's Parliamentarian to find a way for the issue to be addressed.

McKissic was told that there was still a way: He could try to bring it up again at another session that night.

He did, but this time he didn't come alone. A group of mostly young, Gen-X and Millennial pastors had mobilized through social media, and vowed to help him navigate convention rules to force a vote.

"I'm going to make sure that this Southern Baptist Convention is not going to complete with any illusion that this entity supports in any way a racist group, especially in light of the fact that this convention was founded on racist ideologically," Kell said. "Being unclear on the spirit of this is dumb, foolish and bad stewardship of time."

Charles Hedman, a pastoral assistant at Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, DC, and an attorney versed in the arcane rules of parliamentary procedure, took the lead from the floor.

He called on the convention to reconsider McKissic's resolution and "condemn the alt-right from the stage as we speak right now so there is not misunderstanding from the press or this convention."

Standing at another microphone across the room, Kell pressed further.

"I just want clarity from the president of the Southern Baptist Convention about whether we condemn, as a convention, racism," he said.

Speaking from the stage, Gaines responded, "I'll speak for myself. I don't know that I can speak for everyone in this room, but I believe God loves everyone. I believe there is only one race and that is the human race."

Another vote was taken on whether to make more time to reconsider.

They wouldn't know the results for another three hours.

Danny Akin, a denomination leader and president of the Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, called Gaines on the phone.

"I think we're heading toward a trainwreck,"Akin warned him.

As a back-up plan, a group of pastors came together and vowed to work through the night to draft their own resolution condemning racism and release it on their own accord through social media.

But behind the scenes, Southern Baptist leaders were already working fast.

Russell Moore, the president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, and a leading Southern Baptist voice on the issue of racial reconciliation, took the lead to re-write the resolution. As an outspoken critic of Trump in 2016, Moore became a polarizing figure last year -- at least temporarily -- within the denomination. Trump went on to win a supermajority of support from evangelical voters, putting Moore largely out of step with his theological brethren.

But that was then. Now, the Southern Baptists needed his voice more than ever.

"It was critically important to get this right" Moore said. "The alt-right isn't just some sociological movement. The alt-right is contrary to the gospel of Jesus Christ and Satanic to the core. We need to be very clear on that."

Moore and members of leadership went into overdrive working backstage on a new, air-tight resolution.

After a worship service and a ceremony to commission new missionaries, Gaines and other leaders returned to the stage to announce the results of the vote three hours earlier.

This one, too, he announced, failed to reach the two-thirds needed. Messengers in the conventional hall gasped.

Gaines, however, was resolute about not leaving until the issue was addressed. Under a cloud of external pressure from media reports saying they had failed to condemn racism and a storm of criticism on social media, Gaines decided to push the boundaries of the rules.

The Resolutions Committee, he said, recognized that they had made a mistake and unanimously voted to request something of a parliamentary do-ver. Even though they had already formally closed their annual report, they requested permission from the convention to use open time the next day to hold a vote on a newly worded resolution that would condemn the of the philosophy alt-right.

A sea of hands went up throughout the convention all. Organizers said they saw only one person vote in opposition.

After the dramatic vote, pastors gathered in a nearby room to debrief, where they acknowledged that they narrowly dodged a catastrophe.

"We ended up with a black eye here," said Al Mohler, president of the Southern Theological Seminary. "We should never apologize for doing the right thing even if we end up a little bruised in doing it, even if we stumble over each other on the way to doing it. ...Thanks be to God we got a chance to come back tomorrow and say what we want to say.

"That was so close to being a disaster."

Read more:
After high drama, Southern Baptists denounce the 'Alt-Right' - CNN

Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters.

A Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate who was backed by, and affiliated with, segments of the alt-right media nearly won the states June 13 gubernatorial primary.

Corey Stewart, chairman of the Prince William County Board of Supervisors, narrowly lost to frontrunner Ed Gillespie, former chairman of Republican National Committee (RNC), by only slightly more than a percentage point.

Stewart, who was Virginia state co-chairman of President Donald Trumps 2016 presidential campaign, heavily courted the alt-right during his campaign, which he announced in April 2016. While he was the co-chair, Stewart wrote multiple pieces for alt-right-promoting website Breitbart. Shortly after he was fired from his position in October for taking part in a protest against the RNC, Stewart gave an interview to Mike Cernovich, an alt-right-affiliated troll who has a history of promoting conspiracy theories. During the interview, Cernovich said that he calls establishment Republicans cucks because they like to see Trump get screwed over by the media, thats what they get off on. Stewart replied, Yeah, I would agree. The term cuck, short for cuckservative, is widely used within alt-right circles.

In March, Stewart did a question-and-answer session on the Reddit forum r/The_Donald, an alt-right-affiliated forum that has, in tandem with other alt-right figures and fake news purveyors, helped spread conspiracy theories and misinformation. Stewart wrote on the forum that he is opposing the establishments handpicked candidate, former Bush guy, RNC chairman, and cuckservative, Ed Gillespie. The Virginia GOP state chairman criticized Stewart, noting that the term was used by white nationalists. r/The_Donald would go on to promote Stewarts primary campaign, along with 4chan /pol/, another alt-right-affiliated forum.

During his campaign, Stewart also criticized the city of Charlottesvilles plan to remove astatue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, going to rallies to protest the citys action. He also responded to his critics by tweeting, Nothing is worse than a Yankee telling a Southerner that his monuments dont matter. Richard Spencer, a white nationalist who originally created the term alt-right, subsequently led a group of torch-wielding protesters in the city to protest removal of the statue. Stewart was the only candidate to not directly condemn Spencers protest. Stewarts stand earned him praise from alt-right outlets and figures: the neo-Nazi and alt-right-affiliated blog The Daily Stormer wrote that Stewarts actions showed how you win the game and how we go mainstream, while Occasional Dissent, a blog run by anti-Semitic writer Hunter Wallace, claimed that Stewart was taking a stand for Dixie.

After the close primary election, alt-right figures cheered Stewarts near-upset. Cernovich tweeted that the result showed GOP globalists that theyre all going to have primary challengers. He also said that Stewart showed them what one man can do with his populist revolution. Another alt-right-affiliated troll, Jack Posobiec, tweeted, Gillespie outspent Stewart 5-to-1 and barely won the race. Take note, Establishment. VDare, another alt-right-connected outletwhich frequently publishes articles written by white nationalists, claimed Stewarts heroic effort against useless consultantcuck Ed Gillespie showed nationalism lives.

Header image bySarah Wasko / Media Matters

Here is the original post:
An Alt-Right-Affiliated Candidate Nearly Won Virginia's GOP Gubernatorial Primary - The National Memo (blog)

The event underscores a growing rift between the Patriot movement and other elements on the far right over the formers apparent lack of racialist sentiment.

Were not white nationalists. Were not racists of any kind. And if they show up [at our rally], I am going to personally, physically remove them. Because they are trying to co-opt what were trying to do.

Although Stewart Rhodes, founder and president of the Oath Keepers, has yet to uphold this threat, an alleged member of his organization seems to have done just that.

Video footage of a confrontation between a white nationalist protester and a member of This Is Texas, a purported affiliate of the Oath Keepers, shows a white nationalist protester being ejected from a group of Patriots after one of them snuck up behind the man and put him in a choke hold. The video has elicited strong responses from groups affiliated with the alt right.

The scuffle occurred at Hermann park in Houston, Texas after afake Antifa (short for Anti-Fascist) Facebook accounttitled Texas Antifa announced their plans to protest the parks Sam Houston statue, for Houstons status as a slaveholder. Whatever response the page and post were intended to garner, they elicited a strong response from This Is Texas, which announced on a Facebook page for the event:

Antifa has come out saying they will be bringing several large (communist) groups together to host a rally around the Museum District in Houston, Texas on June 10, 2017... This is it Texans, This Is Texas & it's time we nip this problem in the butt before our state starts looking more like California or Chicago rather than Texas. Please share this event & our FaceBook page (THIS IS TEXAS) so Texans, III%ers, Oath Keepers, Conservatives, Constitutionalist & others are aware of the rally & can join if they would like to do so. God bless Texas!

This Is Texas was successful in drawing out a large crowd bearing various flags, including the Confederate Battle Flags, Gadsden flags, and flags of various militia and so-called Patriot organizations. As for the Black Panther Party, Antifa & more promised by This Is Texas, they were nowhere to be seen. Nevertheless, if This Is Texas et al. was spoiling for a fight that day, it certainly found one.

What the group hadnt counted on was a small group associated with neo-Nazi websiteThe Daily Stormerand Vanguard America (VA) also attending withflags of their own, including VA banners with the slogan We Have A Right To Exist, theKekistani flag, and VAs own recently adopted banner featuring a blue sonnenrad in front of a red and white striped field.

VA a fledgling neo-Nazi group associated with Identity Evropa and The Right Stuff is perhaps best known for an incident when a member offered to sell out his organization in exchange for not being doxed.

The video in question begins after police purportedly told a group of white nationalists from VA andTheDaily Stormer,which organizes real-world book clubs, to leave one area of the park after some back and forth with the Patriots. One man wearing the uniform sported at protests by VA members, a polo and khakis, returned to gather posters adorned with Pepe,Wojak, and the slogan No Blood for Israel that had been left behind, but instead entered into a bizarre verbal confrontation with several of the Oath Keepers.

These are good memes... the lone alt-righter protested as he juggled the signs, a megaphone and the VA flag.

Dude this is not Comicon!

As the shouting continued, David Amad, of Open Carry Texas (OCT), stepped forward. Son you are leaving here one way or another.

Before Amad could finish the threat a member of his group sprang from behind the lone alt righter and put him into a chokehold. After a few seconds the two were separated and Amad escorted the victim away from the scene while This Is Texas/OCT members radioed to police.

Thats why we were trying to escort you out, motherf***er! taunted one of the so-called Patriots.

The incident wasnt the only example of Amad failing to maintain control or cohesion at the protest.

Later footage shows Amad and members of This Is Texas arguing with a larger group of white nationalists, including the man who writes forThe Daily Stormerunder the pen name Azzmador.

What you gonna do, you gonna start a fight while packing a rifle? Azzmador can be heard shouting as the argument became heated.

An affiliate of Amads organization, who identified himself as head of security and commander of the Texas State Militia was also filmed as he approached black Confederate Arlene Barnum to ask whether her fellow flaggers, who were white, would put down their Confederate battle flags.

I think that you [Arlene Barnum] are the best example of why you should carry [that flag]... and Im not saying that in a bad way, you know what I mean? But if you dont mind, could you be the only one please?

The request was rebuffed.

Given all of the consternation surrounding the handling of the event, it is not surprising Oath Keepers has taken to Facebook to insist that the man who choked the VA member was not one of its own. The video has caused numerous denunciations of Oath Keepers and its leadership by several alt right websites, including AltRight.com, Brad Griffin AKA Hunter Wallace onOccidental DissentandThe Daily Stormer.

An article on AltRight.com titled Oathkeepers Turn Against the Alt Right was the first shell fired in a building salvo against Oath Keepers, and was quickly picked up by TheDaily Stormer.

These incidents comes on the heels of several other public spats between members of the Alt Right and various Patriot and militia groups.

Brad Griffin, who writes onOccidental Dissentunder the alias Hunter Wallace, has posted accounts of feuds between Patriot and militia organizations such as American Warrior Resistance and Oath Keepers after disagreements in Gainesville and New Orleans over the past month.

Im addressing a group called the American Warrior Revolution, were addressing our friends the Oathcucks, and various III% militia groups. Weve been watching you people since then and weve had a little trouble.

Griffin goes on to accuse the varied groups that make up Patriot Nation of being deracinated cucks and failing to support our free speech and defending our monuments, by standing in the way of the League of the South in New Orleans, Gainesville, and elsewhere.

The allegation that Oath Keepers are cucks who talk about how anti-racist they are, commonly referred to as virtue signaling, is a cardinal sin on the far right and a source of much of the ire directed against Oath Keepers, other militia groups, conservatives politicians, religious leaders, and in particular, boomers.

For Griffin and the other members of the far right now arrayed against Oath Keepers and the larger Patriot movement, the issue is that Oath Keepers tend to rely on public expressions of racial impartiality while hiding its own ethnic biases.

Last year, Stewart Rhodes and his Oath Keepers endorsed the virulently anti-Muslim essay, Tet Take Two: Islams 2016 European Offensive, which describes Islam as a ringworm infection [that] is dead and barren within the ring, but flares up when it parasitically feeds off the healthy, non-Islamic societies around it.

The essays author, former Navy SEAL turned Patriot novelist, Matt Bracken, believes that refugees in Europe represent a second Tet offensive, a reference to the 1968 infiltration of South Vietnam by Vietcong guerrilla fighters who then launched a surprise offensive.

Bracken blames Eurocrat elites for open European Union borders, saying they purposely have created a wide path for the onrushing Muslim hijra immigration invasion. Rhodes agrees, and said the same thing is happening in the United States.

The martial skill set bragged about by Oath Keepers, and the inclusion of anti-Muslim conspiracy theories into its worldview, showed its head in the physical space when ACT For America an anti-Muslim hate group listed by the SPLC asked the organization to provide security for its March Against Sharia rallies last weekend. Oath Keepers was eager to oblige, and its members, including Rhodes, were seen at several rallies carrying long guns and attempting to rub shoulders with law enforcement, who until the election of Donald Trump were frequently on the other end of Oath Keepers barrels.

This occurs as various long-standing divisions between far right groups appear to be breaking down in favor of loose coalitions in opposition to the looming specter of Black Lives Matter and Antifa, which was effective in mobilizing attendance at the Houston event.

Whether Amad, This Is Texas, and the various other Patriot and militia types in question are directly affiliated with Rhodes and the Oath Keepers, these incidents do tend to corroborate warnings from various watchdog groups about the threat posed by militia and Patriot groups appearing heavily armed at protests.

While they claim to be present to support law enforcement and defend the Constitution, the brutish tactics on display in Houston and elsewhere make it clear that entering tense political environments decked out in tactical apparel with a rifle and body armor does little to promote civil discourse.

Read the original:
"Alt-Right" Declares Flame War On Oath Keepers - Southern Poverty Law Center

The use of minorities as stock villains is something that has plagued entertainment media for years. Now that political correctness has gone thankfully mad, it has become less acceptable to lean on generic brown terrorists, effeminate criminal masterminds or scheming mandarins when finding adversaries for an action hero to plow through. Video games may have lagged behind somewhat but many developers do at least make some effort to to avoid stereotyping.

There is one notable exception, however. One beleaguered minority that seemingly has no voice in wider society. Nobody to stand up and say, "Enough. Leave these poor people alone, you MONSTERS."

I'm talking, of course, about Nazis.

Yes, the proud Aryans (and affiliates) of the Alt-Right are sick of being the go-to target for self-righteous good-guys. Why should they be treated as scum, fit only for vigorous fragging and expertly chained combos? Where is the respect? The simple human decency?

And what has triggered these snowflake stormtroopers? A vicious piece of anti-Nazi propaganda in the form of a trailer for Bethesda's latest game - Wolfenstein: The New Colossus.

A brief history of shooting Nazis in the face

There are many, many games that involve the punching, stabbing, shooting and general doing-in of members of the National Socialist party. From the Indiana Jones point-and-click adventures to the full-on assault of Medal of Honour, with plenty of oddities like the superhero antics of Freedom Force vs the Third Reich in between. The gold standard of Nazi-harm, however, is the Wolfenstein series.

Starting in 1981, with the 2D Castle Wolfenstein, the series put you in the shoes of all-American bruiser BJ Blazkowicz, deep behind enemy lines and on a largely stealth-based mission to infiltrate the titular, Nazi-occupied castle. By 1992, the series found its groove with Wolfenstein 3d - one of the earliest first-person shooters and the template for pretty much every game in that genre to this day.

After shooting your way through the primitively-rendered 3D castle, you would finally do battle with a cybernetically-enhanced MECHA-HITLER, thus cementing the franchise's reputation for cold-edged realism.

Later reboots gave us Return To Castle Wolfenstein and simply 'Wolfenstein', both of which featured multiplayer Nazi-duffing as well as a load of occult bits and bobs, because the Nazis were definitely into that, no matter what David Duke says. There was even a Wolfenstein role-playing game for (non-smart)phones, allowing turn-based Nazi foiling you could carry around in your pocket.

Which brings us to the most recent iterations of the Wolfenstein experience. 2014s Wolfenstein: The New Order and this years entrant, Wolfenstein: The New Colossus. These games take place in an alternate reality, a 1960s in which the Nazis defeated the Allies and took over the world. Only you, a revived BJ Blazkowitz, can lead the fightback and kick the ascendant fascists right in the crease of their impeccable uniforms.

Why now?

Im not here to debate the ethics of video game violence. You can see first-person shooters as a malign influence on our Pop Kids or as a harmless exhaust pipe for pent-up frustrations or as anything else you like. Im easy. The recent outpouring of Alt-Right anger does raise one important question, though. Given the fact that we are now well into the fourth decade of digital Nazi slaughter, why is it only now that games like this have put the far right on the defensive?

Reactions to the New Colossus trailer have been mainly positive, with fans of The New Order relishing the chance to get back to that games formula of fast-paced action and light puzzle solving. The game resembles a glossier, Nazi-themed Half Life 2 sequel as much as anything.

Among the criticisms from the Alt-Right are accusations that the game is racist to white people. The evidence for this seems to lie in a black woman character who at one point refers to our man BJ as white boy.

As YouTuber Bob Ross comments, That black Afro whore calling that white man a white boy... More racist agenda against white people.

An anonymous commenter to 4Chan has seen through the real agenda behind the game. Bethesda jews are trying to destroy gaming industry with political correctness fagottry.

Ultimately, as YouTube commenter Bobby Johnson puts it, Why are people hating nazis? You should be hating muslims who are terrorizing, murduring, and raping europeans. And the jews

Wise, if poorly spelled, words, Im sure you will agree.

No, the real issue with Wolfenstein: The New Colossus isnt that it strikes a markedly more critical tone against the would-be Master race. The explosions may get bigger and the guns louder with every new game but the Wolfenstein formula is the same as it ever was.

The problem is Trumps brand of populist, easily consumed, fascism-lite. The problem is the dark corners of the net that put the Alt in Alt-Right . The problem is simply that, more than ever, there are now self-identifying Nazis who are willing to peer out from under their stones, hold up their hands at about 45 degrees and cry foul.

Go here to read the rest:
The Alt-Right are complaining about Nazis being killed in video games - New Statesman

Southern Baptists Grapple Over Calls to Condemn Alt-Right Wall Street Journal (subscription) PHOENIXThe Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest Protestant denomination, denounced the alt-right movement and white supremacy on Wednesday, following a dramatic 24-hours during which the organization openly wrestled with whether ...

Read the original:
Southern Baptists Grapple Over Calls to Condemn Alt-Right - Wall Street Journal (subscription)