Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

Succession recap: season four, episode eight nothing is more sadistic than the words Is that even true? – The Guardian

Succession: episode by episode

Adult diapers at the ready! Its election night and the results are unimaginably disastrous. Will revenge be sweet for Shiv?

Mon 15 May 2023 17.10 EDT

Spoiler alert: this recap is for people watching Succession season four. Dont read on unless youve watched episode eight.

A pressure-cooker episode, largely set in ATN HQ on its first post-Logan election night, saw the quad squad at war. Here are the exit polls for the eighth episode, titled America Decides

We began with ATN boss Tom Wambsgans (Matthew Macfadyen) juggling a chaotic newsroom with demands from his in-laws to deliver blockbuster ratings. He admitted to being a little bit tense from last nights marital strife. Comfy shoes, adult diapers and double shot coffees were required, as was a bump of cocaine from cousin Greg (Nicholas Braun). Definitely no bodega sushi, though. Not for Tightrope Tom-Woms refined palate.

Greg was not-so-fresh from his night on the tiles with GoJo mogul Lukas Matsson (Alexander Skarsgrd), whod made him visit unseemly venues, dance with a confused old man and drink things that arent normally drinks. He had, however, learned about Shivs secret alliance with the striking Viking. Knowledge is power, said Tom, but tonight he wanted the leggy princeling Gregging for me again. Latest polling predicted a tight race, with Democrat candidate Daniel Jimnez (Elliot Villar) edging it but a night is a long time in politics. Its even longer on a rolling news channel with malfunctioning touchscreens and micro-managing CEOs.

Upstairs in the VIP suite, the Roy siblings clashed over consequences of the result for themselves, for the firm and, far less importantly, for the country. Shiv (Sarah Snook) was texted an optimistic four smileys by Jimnezs running mate, Gil Eavis. Roman (Kieran Culkin) received eggplant, eggplant, flag from alt-right rival Jeryd Mencken (Justin Kirk). This would become a running theme: liberal Shiv scurrying off to check in with the Dems, Romulus flirting with the neo-Nazis. He wanted ATN to Trumpishly claim voter fraud. She wanted it to report on civil unrest and voter intimidation. He took impish delight in winding up his sis by dismissing such concerns as false flags.

If Jimnez won, his administration would probably wave through Waystars acquisition by GoJo, leaving the brothers with the board and shareholders nixing the deal as their last hope of retaining ownership. Good for democracy and great for us, Shiv told co-conspirator Matsson. When Kendall (Jeremy Strong) wished Jimnez luck and nudged him to rein in tech once in power, he got short shrift. Roman had more joy with kindred spirit Mencken. They agreed on what assholes would call a narrative. If he lost, Mencken wanted it characterised as a huge victory, laying groundwork for the next election. If he won, hed refer the sale to regulators in exchange for ATNs explicit backing. So it came to pass.

Amid the mayhem, Shiv collared Tom for a corridor tte--tte. Roys rarely apologise, but she said sorry for some of the things I said last night and gave Tom the opportunity to retract too. Except he didnt. Emotionally detached Tom sneered that she was merely worried hed blab about her Matsson alliance, cruelly adding: You hated your dad and kind of killed him.

As a last resort, reeling Shiv shared the news she has been sitting on for four episodes: Also, actually, Im pregnant. By you. Thats one question answered. Tom blankly asked if it was even true or a negotiating tactic. Poleaxed by his cold, sadistic reaction, Shiv stormed off. She took out her frustrations on punchbag Greg, wrongfooting the babbling beanpole by asking if he found her attractive, before threatening him to keep her double-dealing on the downlow. But as we know, morally flexible Gregs hardly rock solid.

When a Milwaukee voting count centre was firebombed and evacuated, ATNs touchpaper was similarly lit. Roman waved it off as antifa or an electrical fire. Shiv and old flame Nate Sofrelli (Ashley Zukerman), part of Team Jimnez, wanted it pinned on pro-Mencken extremists. Caught in the middle, Tom desperately tried to keep the Roys off the newsroom floor.

But Roman had had enough of experts. He steamrollered resident polling guru Darwin (British actor Adam Godley) into calling Wisconsin for Mencken, despite ballots being lost in the blaze. To add injury to insult, human abacus Darwin got wasabi in his eyes, which hapless Greg tried to wash out with lemonade. The slapstick came as a respite from the relentless tension. While Jimnez urged the media to respect the process and wait until all votes could be counted, Romulus ordered ATNs Nazi-sympathising anchor Mark Ravenhead (Zack Robidas) to go full Tucker Carlson, ranting on-air about woke conspiracies against traditional values. As Shiv watched aghast and Kendall seemed depressively inert, ATN lurched even further to the right.

When Arizona went red too, Roman pushed hard to call the election for Mencken. Kendall urged caution but Roman argued that putting their man in the West Wing was what their father would have done. It would kill the deal and was all upside, bar the small matter of the country burning. Dwelling on his daughters recent brush with a racist Ravenhead acolyte, Kendall consulted his sis. Except Shiv secretly had skin in the game.

Roused from his stupor, Kendall levelled with Shiv. He admitted he was tempted to seize sole control of the company and felt threatened by Romans relationship with Mencken. However, stopping Matsson remained his priority. Shiv warned against giving Mencken the legitimacy to declare himself president, not least because if the courts reversed the Wisconsin result, theyd be discredited as a news organisation. She reassured Kendall he was a good guy, appealing to his sense of decency. He asked Shiv to see one last time if the Democrats could block the GoJo takeover too. Cue a killer twist. Wanting to preserve the deal in exchange for a powerful position in the newly merged company, Shiv only pretended to phone Nate.

Under pressure to make a decision, Kendall tried Nate himself. Horrified Shiv was powerless to stop him. In a squirm-inducing scene that seemed to unfold in slow motion, Kendall realised shed lied and got confirmation from Greg that she was aligned with Matsson. Partly out of expediency and partly to spite her, he agreed to call it for Mencken. Cue a chillingly fascistic victory speech, with Hocus Potus saying hed been anointed by an authority of known integrity. Ahem.

Everyone except Roman was shellshocked. PA Jess (Juliana Canfield) looked fearful. Kendall wanted to reassure his kids. Tom was scapegoated by left-leaning Pierce Global News (ATN head blasted for premature projection). We just made a good night of TV, shrugged Roman nihilistically after taking a grateful call from Mencken. Thats all. Nothing happens. Things do happen, Rome, said Shiv, eyes ablaze. She advised Matsson to go public with GoJos subscriber scandal, burying bad news amid the election fallout, and vowed to do a number on her brothers. The sibs were on a war footing. Again.

Whither the dynastys own White House wannabe? Egged on by wife Willa (Justine Lupe), spare part sibling Connor (Alan Ruck) complained that ATN were filming him but the footage wasnt making it to air. Well, duh. His best bet for making his paltry supporter base count was Kentucky. When Mencken won it, Connor asked Roman if a cushy job might still be on offer. In return, he could concede in Menckens direction.

Keen to maintain momentum, Mencken agreed to make Connor ambassador to Slovenia. Now all he needed to do was make a statesmanlike concession speech live on-air. It soon descended into Father Ted-style swipes at those whod wronged him and defiance about his inherited wealth (The politics of envy are ugly. I happen to be a billionaire, sorry). He couldnt even do defeat properly.

With kingmaker Roman set to have a direct line into the Oval Office and an agreement from Mencken to block the takeover, he came out on top. Kendalls reverse Viking plan remains cooking on the back burner.

Roman wisecracked at warp speed and Kendalls goose trying to shit a housebrick merits a mention. Yet the prize goes to Toms advice to Greg: Information is like a bottle of fine wine. You store it, you hoard it, you save it for a special occasion and then you smash someones fucking face in with it. Hopefully its not biodynamic German red with the bouquet of wet dog.

This episode was written by Jesse Armstrong, who steers his ship home by penning the final three instalments. Next weeks is titled Church and State, set at a certain funeral.

A low profile for the greybeards again, with Frank, Karl and Hugo reduced to heckling from the balcony like Statler and Waldorf. Gerri will presumably return for the funeral, alongside exes Marcia and Lady Caroline.

Note how Connors campaign slogan, with delicious double meaning, was Enough already!. Jimnezs was the Obama-esque Lets do this!.

Will Menckens mob storm the Capitol? Will revenge be sweet for Shiv? Rejoin us here next Monday. In the meantime, normalists, stay hydrated and leave your thoughts below.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

Continued here:
Succession recap: season four, episode eight nothing is more sadistic than the words Is that even true? - The Guardian

How younger voters will impact elections: How legacy media and social media impact old and young voters – Brookings Institution

Editor's Note:

In this series we look at how younger voters are likely to impact future elections and American politics going forward.

As we have seen in other articles in these pages, social media has become a key driver of the widening gap in voting behavior between voters over and under 45 years of age. In this article, we look at how the media habits of old and young voters contribute to and enable this gap.

Compared to news delivery systems in the past, news on social media is highly decentralized at its origin and destination. Rather than relying on executives, anchors, and editors to decide what news is fit for consumption, social media places that power directly in the hands of the user. This power allows users to seek out news that interests them and aligns with their concerns, resulting in a fragmented news landscape not defined by political polarization. With this greater access to personalized news feeds comes greater diversity in political perspectives.[1]

According to Pew, over 40% of Americans aged 18-29 say that their primary source of news comes from social media. Twenty-two percent of Americans aged 30-49 say the same. That number plummets to 6% and 3% respectively for those aged 50-64 and 65+. A greater percentage of 1829-year-olds get their news from social media than 65+ year-olds do from cable news shows.

This remarkable skew between older and younger generations has implications beyond just delivery methods because the experience of getting news from social media differs so drastically from the experience of getting news from legacy media.

Viewership among legacy news outlets (national network and cable news, radio, newspapers, and magazines) splits into two different ecosystems defined by party. Recent Pew research could not find a single news outlet that was watched by a majority of both Democrats and Republicans. Pew was able to identify a number of legacy news sources used almost exclusively by one party.

Social media platforms, by contrast, have users from both parties. The two most popular social media platforms, YouTube and Facebook, are used by the majority of adults in both parties and have almost no partisan split.

Source: Pew Research Center

Source: Pew Research Center

Source: Pew Research Center

There are still some party differences within the social media ecosystem, however. Younger Democrats are more likely to be on every major platform excluding Facebook. Instagram has an especially large gap between parties. But unlike legacy media, what isnt present in the data is a widely used platform just for Republicans or just for Democrats.[2]

The world of legacy media is bifurcated. The world of social media is fragmented.

The world of legacy media is bifurcated. The world of social media is fragmented.

The social versus traditional news usage patterns hold when looking specifically at those who report getting news from a platform, not just using it.

[3]Although there are differences by party, they are nowhere near the disparities we see in usage patterns by party in legacy media, and no single legacy media outlet approaches the consensus shown in the use of YouTube as a news source.

This is not to say that the experiences of Republicans and Democrats are at all similar on YouTube. A 34-year-old Democrat living in Detroit sees roughly the same thing on NBC News each day as a 68-year-old Republican living in Seattle because the news content is curated by the network, not the user. But a 26-year-old Republican living in Birmingham may have a dramatically different YouTube feed than a 26-year-old Democrat living across the street.

Social media is designed to intentionally fragment user bases into ever narrower groups defined by specific personal interests. A single social media user could belong to a climate change collective on Instagram, an anti-tax Facebook group, and a Southeast Asian cooking community on TikTok. This varied news diet is virtually impossible to receive through legacy medias bifurcated news landscape.

This same characteristic of hyper-personalized news feeds can lead to echo chambers, which happen when a pocket of like-minded individuals forms and fosters distrust of outside sources. But this same phenomenon of pocket formation is also how Internet fandoms develop and how BookTok or Black Twitter or a Zelda subreddit forms.

In short, those who get their news from social media have a greater diversity in opinion than those who primarily get their news from legacy media.

Recent survey data from Pew shows how the relationship differences in social media usage by age relates to peoples political ideology. Pew refines political ideology by splitting the public into nine distinct groups: four on the left, four on the right and one with those too uninvolved politically to be classified.

Source: Pew Research Center

Within the four groups that make up consistent Democratic voters, older Democrats are much more likely to cluster in just two of Pews typologies either Democratic Mainstay or Establishment Liberal.[4] Democrats under 50, by contrast, are just as likely to be found in any of the four groups; they have no clear typology preference. As a result, it would be much easier to predict the political ideology of a 53-year-old Democrat chosen at random than a 31-year-old.

[5]To a lesser extent this holds for Republicans as well; however, older Republicans are slightly more varied in their political ideology than their Democratic counterparts. Younger Republicans are slightly less varied in comparison to younger Democrats. A plurality of them is categorized by Pew as being in the Ambivalent Right typology. The prevalence of this ideological perspective among younger Republican party identifiers and the lack of young Republicans in traditionally conservative typologies squares with research showing that young Republicans are increasingly at odds with older members of their party.

The Pew political ideology data shows younger voters are driving emerging new wings of both parties. This is happening in the Republican Party with the rise of the Ambivalent Right. Among Democrats its reflected in the fact that younger voters make up the bulk of those Pew calls the Outsider Left and Progressive Left. Both phenomena are enabled by the nature of the social media they use as the principal source of news for voters under 50.

Social media allows younger Americans to have more individualized political interests than older voters. They are seeking a political party that will support this diversity of perspectives and welcome their ideas. Whichever one does so through an effective understanding of the social media information ecosystem will enjoy ever increasing electoral success.

Footnotes

[1] This blog does not address the issue of mis/disinformation social media, which is related to news ecosystems, but not directly under the scope of this blog.With users serving as their own editors, mis/disinformation can more easily slip into their news diet, but how this compares to legacy media and how it is driven by partisan forces requires further analysis.

[2] Alt-Right social media sites exist but are currently at such a low level of usage that they dont impact the overall results.

[3] This data was provided by Pew in a specific crosstab request and is not available on their website data. To view see the following PP_2021.11.09_political-typology_REPORT. Pew did not have specific age breaks on their website, so they created a new document with those breaks for us. For each of the individual social media sites, a respondent is asked if they used a specific site for news information only if they had first indicated that they had ever used that platform.

[4] A value of 20% in the graphs indicates 20% of total Democrats are 50+ and Democratic Mainstays not 20% of Democrats who are 50+ are Democratic Mainstays.

[5] The data used for the graphs is not directly included in Pews published work. Pew published the percent of each party in each typology and the percent of each typology who was under 50. We used these two sets of figures to calculate what percent of each party was young and in a specific typology group. This is the data used for the graphs and that data set is included below.

Excerpt from:
How younger voters will impact elections: How legacy media and social media impact old and young voters - Brookings Institution

Is Mencken Based on Trump in ‘Succession’? He’s an Alt-Right … – Distractify

Is Mencken based on Donald Trump in Succession? The alt-right politician, Jeryd Mencken, is front and center in Season 4, Episode 8.

Its no secret that the characters in Succession are based on several real-life counterparts. Now that the election is finally upon our favorite (or least favorite) characters, its time to look in-depth at Jeryd Mencken (Justin Kirk). We first meet Mencken in Season 3 in the famous What It Takes episode, which brings us behind the scenes of the Republican Partys corruption.

Article continues below advertisement

At the time, Logan Roy decides to back Mencken as the Republican candidate in the upcoming election over more centrist and traditional options. Roman (Kieran Culkin) sees himself in Mencken and they bond over their disruptor identities. But now that were on the precipice of Successions final Election Day, we cant help but wonder if Mencken is directly based on Donald Trump.

Article continues below advertisement

While the most obvious comparison to draw to Jeryd Mencken is Donald Trump, Mencken is perhaps an even more ominous future of Americas democracy. It could be surmised that the previous president, nicknamed The Raisin, was more Trump-esque, although we know little about him besides his willingness to bend to the Roys. Of course, Trump bends to no one (or so it seems), which is just one similarity he shares with Mencken.

In Succession, Mencken is an outspoken alt-right pundit who believes that races shouldnt mix (yep, hes very scary). When he says things like, People trust people who look like them, and I love this country, but lets take a beat before we fundamentally alter its composition, these are carefully-coded phrases to further his all-white agenda.

Article continues below advertisement

We know that Mencken is not a good guy, thanks to Shivs aversion to him. While Shiv has already thrown her morals in the trash, she supported Gil Eavis (a Bernie Sanders stand-in) at one point, so her heart was in the right place. She fears that if Mencken wins, women, children, people of color, and all disenfranchised communities will be in major trouble. But most importantly, the future of democracy will be at risk.

Article continues below advertisement

This sounds like what people said about Trump, but Mencken also draws comparisons to pundits such as Richard Spencer, Josh Hawley, and Tucker Carlson. Mencken is much younger and more charismatic than Trump, and his all-white agenda closely mirrors Richard's. Mencken tells the voters that no one can pocket him. But at the same time, he will happily conspire with the Roy family to accomplish a shared agenda.

Richard Spencer

Article continues below advertisement

Many right-wing politicians and pundits today, Trump aside, claim theyre all doing what they believe is right for the country. They claim they cant be bought and, like Trump, denounce traditional politics. Mencken does the same. Shiv even calls him a YouTube provocateur, hinting at a possible Jordan Peterson comparison as well. But at the end of the day, our politicians and Mencken all have their own power and financial interests at heart.

While Mencken may not be a direct version of Trump, he definitely evokes bits and pieces of Trumps rhetoric and election behavior. Democratic candidate Daniel Jimnez (Elliot Villar), on the other hand, is unwilling to play into the Roys hands. Kendall (Jeremy Strong) has made it clear that ideologically, he wants Jimnez to win, but because Jimnez is less willing than Mencken to play ball with the Roys, Kendalls allegiances are more complicated.

Article continues below advertisement

We know that Gil draws many parallels to Bernie Sanders, but who does that make Jimnez? Because Jimnez wins the Democratic ticket, Gil is in the race as his running mate. However, Bernie didnt run alongside Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden in their respective elections. In fact, Kendall and Jimnez seem to have somewhat of a relationship, but whenever Kendall speaks to him, he doesnt seem very open or interested in what Kendalls agenda is.

Article continues below advertisement

Jimnez evokes politicians such as Barack Obama or Cory Bookerhes a charismatic person of color who still feeds into the political system to rise above it. In many ways, this means that Jimnez is willing to sit down at the table with the Roys, but whether he would ever agree to anything with them is a major question mark. Even still, for the future of democracy, it seems like Shiv and Kendall want Jimnez to win.

Of course, as the owners of ATN, the Roys have some power over what happens, which is a scary depiction of our real-life democracy. Is it really left in the hands of the wealthiest few?

Tune into Succession every Sunday at 9 p.m. EST on HBO to see who takes the cake in an all-too-realistic alternate reality.

Read more from the original source:
Is Mencken Based on Trump in 'Succession'? He's an Alt-Right ... - Distractify

Irish Times apologises for hoax AI article about womens use of fake tan – The Guardian

Irish Times

The piece ran on 11 May and accused people who use fake tan of mocking those with naturally dark skin

The Irish Times has apologised for running an article about Irish womens use of fake tan that was submitted by a hoaxer who used artificial intelligence.

The editor, Ruadhn Mac Cormaic, said on Sunday that it had fallen victim to a deliberate and coordinated deception that showed a need for stronger controls.

It was a breach of the trust between the Irish Times and its readers, and we are genuinely sorry. The incident has highlighted a gap in our pre-publication procedures, he said in a statement.

We need to make them more robust, and we will. It has also underlined one of the challenges raised by generative AI for news organisations. We, like others, will learn and adapt.

The paper ran the opinion piece from a contributor bylined as Adriana Acosta-Cortez on 11 May. It accused Irish women who used fake tan of mocking those with naturally dark skin. Acosta-Cortez was described as a 29-year-old Ecuadorian health worker who lived in north Dublin. A profile picture showed a blue-haired woman.

A Twitter account in Acosta-Cortezs name posted a message the next day criticising the Irish Times for running the article:

https://t.co/UHYCk0lHOe@IrishTimes genuinely sad that a once respectable news source has degraded themselves with such divisive tripe in order to generate clicks and traffic for their website. You need a better screening process than a believable gmail address #buyapaper gg

It included a link to an Irish Times article from January about robot infiltration of media.

The newspaper deleted the opinion piece within hours and launched a review.

The statement on Sunday confirmed Irelands paper of record had been duped. As in any 24/7 news operation, some days we do better than others. But last Thursday we got it badly wrong, said Mac Cormaic. It was a hoax; the person we were corresponding with was not who they claimed to be.

The article ran under the headline: Irish womens obsession with fake tan is problematic.

It began: Dear Irish women, we need to talk about fake tan. The article said women who artificially darkened their skin were donning an exotic costume.

Fake tan represents more than just an innocuous cosmetic choice; it raises questions of cultural appropriation and fetishisation of the high melanin content found in more pigmented people.

The piece was the papers second-most read article and prompted debate on radio and social media.

The person who controls Acosta-Cortezs Twitter account told the Guardian on Sunday, via direct message, that the Irish Timess apology sidestepped its decision to publish an incendiary article with an extreme leftwing viewpoint in pursuit of clicks.

The person said they were Irish, a college student and identified as non-binary. They said they created the Acosta-Cortez persona by repurposing the Twitter account, which dates from February 2021, by using some Spanish and following Ecuadorian outlets.

They said they used GPT-4 to create approximately 80% of the article and the image generator Dalle-E 2 to create a profile picture of a quintessential woke journalist using the prompts female, overweight, blue hair, business casual clothing, smug expression.

The hoaxs goal was to give my friends a laugh and to stir the shit in the debate about identity politics.

Some people have called me an alt-right troll but I dont think that I am. I think that identity politics is an extremely unhelpful lens through which to interpret the world.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

Continue reading here:
Irish Times apologises for hoax AI article about womens use of fake tan - The Guardian

The Best Books to Read in 2023 – The New York Times

At The New York Times Book Review, we write about thousands of books every year. Many of them are good. Some are even great. But we get that sometimes you just want to know, What should I read that is good or great for me?

Well, here you go a running list of some of the years best, most interesting, most talked-about books. Check back next month to see what weve added.

(For more recommendations, subscribe to our Read Like the Wind newsletter, check out our romance columnists favorite books of the year so far or visit our What to Read page.)

In this action-packed novel from a Booker Prize winner, a collective of activist gardeners crosses paths with a billionaire doomsday prepper on land they each want for different purposes. The billionaire decides to support the collective, citing common interests, but some of the activists suspect ulterior motives.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

This dazzling, epic narrative, translated from the Spanish by Megan McDowell, is a bewitching brew of mystery and myth, peopled by mediums who can summon the Darkness for a secret society of wealthy occultists seeking to preserve consciousness after death.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

Hardings latest novel was inspired by the true story of a devastating 1912 eviction in Maine that displaced an entire mixed-race fishing community. Harding turns that history into a lyrical tale about the fictional Apple Island on the cusp of destruction.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

I want a hard-boiled tale from a master of noir

In the second novel in Mosleys King Oliver series, a Black private detective in New York investigates whether the government framed a prominent white supremacist. The plot gets more intricate the more he digs, with prison contractors, alt-right militias and Russian oil traffickers all in play.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

Rushdies new novel recounts the long life of Pampa Kampana, who creates an empire from magic seeds in 14th-century India. Her world is one of peace, where men and women are equal and all faiths welcome, but the story Rushdie tells is of a state that forever fails to live up to its ideals.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

A comedic take on the trials of immigration, Mas latest novel follows a Chinese man who is woefully unprepared for his move to America, but who powers through thanks to his belief that generosity and connection always exist among his fellow countrymen.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

In her radiant and brilliantly crafted fourth novel, Napolitano puts a fresh spin on a classic tale of four sisters and the man who joins their family. Take Little Women, move it to modern-day Chicago, add more intrigue, lots of basketball and a different kind of boy next door and youve got the bones of this thoroughly original story.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

Nonfiction

I want to take a head-spinning trip through the deep state

The people in this darkly funny book include fabulists, truth tellers, combatants, whistle-blowers. Like many of us, they have left traces of themselves in the digital ether by making a phone call, texting a friend, looking up something online. Howley writes about the national security state and those who get entangled in it Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Reality Winner all figure into Howleys riveting account.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

The central claim of this manifesto by the Princeton sociologist (who won a Pulitzer Prize for his 2016 book Evicted, about exploitation in Milwaukees poorest housing market) is that poverty in the United States is the product not only of larger economic shifts, but of choices and actions by more fortunate Americans.

Local bookstores | Barnes and Noble | Amazon

More here:
The Best Books to Read in 2023 - The New York Times