Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

Pepe the Frog died, and part of the internet died with him – The Verge

Welcome to Cheat Sheet, our breakdown-style reviews of festival films, VR previews, and other special event releases. This review comes from the 2020 Sundance Film Festival.

Years ago, the birth of a meme was cause for celebration. So when Matt Furies character Pepe first became famous online, it seemed like a good thing. The easygoing cartoon frog was a shorthand for relatable satisfaction or sadness, particularly on the chaotic message board 4chan. And when a friend urged Furie to crack down on copycat Pepes, he didnt see the need. This was, after all, the age where everything was a remix.

But the new documentary Feels Good Man, directed by Arthur Jones, explains the fallout of his decision. In the years that follow, Furie watches his creation get co-opted by white supremacists. He spends months in legal battles with conspiracy theorists and bigots. He agrees to destroy thousands of dollars of Pepe merchandise, afraid it will be worn by neo-Nazis. He pleads with the Anti-Defamation League to remove Pepe from its hate symbol database, then leaves its offices defeated. Its heartbreaking to watch. To a few viewers, that heartbreak will be the point because some of Pepes biggest fans love to watch people suffer.

Feels Good Man is about the rise, fall, and slow recuperation of Pepe the Frog. But its also about the death of a more playful but far too exploitable era of internet culture and about the birth of whatever comes next.

The overall Pepe saga is fairly well-known, but Feels Good Man explores it through a combination of individual biography and cultural analysis. The film is built around Furie and spends a lot of time discussing his comic Boys Club, where Pepe originated. Its artistically ambitious, including some very effective animated segments featuring Pepe and other Furie characters. But it also draws from a range of other sources, including journalists, fellow artists, and a 4chan micro-celebrity.

Pepes story starts in the mid-00s, when artist Matt Furie began posting his comic Boys Club to MySpace. The canonical Pepe was a guileless slacker who hung out with three other anthropomorphic animals, all loosely inspired by Furie and his friends. (Furie also just loves drawing frogs, the film notes.) But the characters simple design meant that you could adapt him for basically any art style or topic. As one internet analyst explains, there are lots of clusters of memes across the internet and there tends to be a Pepe variant in every one.

Pepe was becoming part of the language of the internet. Inevitably, though, that led the frog to some dark places especially in the hands of nihilistic online trolls. 4chan users celebrated mass shootings with his image. When mainstream female celebrities started sharing Pepes, the deeply misogynist site tried to reclaim him with offensive Nazi variations, which were quickly adopted by actual Nazis. A Trump-themed Pepe was retweeted by Trump himself, boosting the candidates support among some of the worst people on the web.

And as Pepes image changed, Furie tried to regain control of his creation. He launched a campaign to draw positive Pepes, canonically killed the character off out of sheer frustration, and began filing suits against right-wing figures who sold Pepe merchandise, including Infowars founder Alex Jones and the author of a xenophobic childrens book. The film follows all of it along with a few tangential topics like Pepecash, a cryptocurrency based around rare Pepe trading cards.

Its hard to imagine a more perfect microcosm of recent internet history than Furies frog. Pepe is the Altamont of memes: a symbol of a countercultures latent flaws curdling into something hideous. In the mid-00s and early 10s, social media helped new artists broadcast their work. 4chan exported lolcats and Rickrolling and the loosely anti-authoritarian Anonymous movement. The internets enemies were government or corporate censors and other stodgy gatekeepers.

But the dark side was always there, too. I used to believe that the internet used to be fun, wrote Whitney Phillips, author of a canonical book on trolling, in an essay last year. The fun just required ignoring all the ugliness. There was a lot I blinked at and ignored then, a lot I made excuses for then, a lot I laughed at then that simply wasnt funny. In some places, nihilism won. 4chans Anonymous movement was supplanted by the anti-feminist Gamergate campaign, the misogynist incel ideology, and the white nationalist alt-right. And the constant creative remixing of ubiquitous memes like Pepe turned them into collateral damage.

Even so, Furie comes off in Feels Good Man as a thoughtful (if confessedly naive) avatar of a genuinely more optimistic online era. While that earns him derision from some of the documentarys participants, including one 4chan user and a Republican strategist, the filmmakers emphasize the cool stuff that has come out of Pepes internet fandom and the charm of his original incarnation in Boys Club.

The filmmakers never suggest that we can go back to that world. Even so, Feels Good Man ends on a note of hope: in 2019, Pepe evolves into something completely new and becomes a symbol of protest in Hong Kong. Its still a serious political use of the meme but he represents good instead of evil.

Many documentaries become less interesting the more you already know about the subject. But Feels Good Man presents a heavily covered story in a thoughtful and vivid way. Even its standard talking-head segments are peppered with compelling absurdities: a self-described chaos magician laying out how memes become reality, a 4channer proudly guiding viewers through his dingy bedrooms utter squalor.

And if you have spent a long time immersed in online culture and media, Feels Good Man has a unique and uncomfortable appeal. The film never demonizes the internet or even lays out an explicit ideological statement. But its still a subtle, cutting rebuke of an old strain of internet idealism the kind that unconditionally celebrated the weird chaos of a cultural petri dish, until it started breeding monsters.

Feels bittersweet, man.

Feels Good Man is seeking distribution, but its perfect for a streaming service like Netflix or Amazon.

Here is the original post:
Pepe the Frog died, and part of the internet died with him - The Verge

Our view: Democrats join the fake news biz – The Journal

One would think we all would have had enough of fake news by now, but to hear some purveyors tell it, the need for it has grown along with the fake news, and making more of it is urgent if we are to save America and the world.

You have heard about fake news disseminated by the right, the alt-right, the Russians and supporters of President Donald Trump. This includes the contention that it was the Democrats who colluded with the Russians in 2016 to throw the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, as well as the story, embraced by Trump, that Ukraine was in cahoots with Democrats to hurt him. That these seem to be pure projection does not keep them from serving as life rafts for those who want to protect the president at all costs.

Facebook, where many Americans get their news, has been turned into one vector for that sort of conspiratorial bushwa, which used to take longer to enter peoples heads and affected fewer souls. Naturally, it and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have been blamed by Democrats from Clinton to Bernie Sanders.

But if you thought this is the kind of malarkey to reach for a Joe Biden word we should expect from modern Republicans only, take a look at a Bloomberg news article from Nov. 25, The Lefts Plan to Slip Vote-Swaying News Into Facebook Feeds.

In this case, it is the Democrats more than the left per se, unless you subscribe to the belief that they are synonymous. Here, it is principally Tara McGowan, a 33-year-old D.C.-based Democratic strategist who is rolling out fake local news sites.

Belying her years, McGowan already served as the digital producer for President Barack Obamas 2012 re-election campaign, then directed digital advertising in 2016 for Priorities USA Action, the biggest Democratic Super PAC. In 2017, she launched the digital firm Acronym, a 501(c)(4) political nonprofit, with Michael Dubin, the wealthy founder of Dollar Shave Club. Together, they have raised tens of millions of dollars for digital ad campaigns supporting Democrats.

Now, and quite openly, McGowan has taken $25 million in donations from wealthy liberals to create a for-profit media company, Courier Newsroom, which has created what it calls digital newspapers, with reporters and editors, in key swing states such as Virginias The Dogwood and Arizonas The Copper Courier in order to deliver the facts favorable to Democrats.

In late December, Courier launched UpNorthNews in Wisconsin Wisconsins new digital newspaper with none of the lazy false equivalency that plagues so much of todays media, its editor said.

McGowan then pays to place the articles on Facebook the way a bona fide media company might. For McGowan, says Bloomberg reporter Joshua Green, emulating the homespun, hyperlocal style of the fast-vanishing small-town newspaper is important for building familiarity and trust.

If you are in the least concerned about fake news, this is a terrible idea. If it were a sci-fi movie, this would be the scene where the disgruntled scientist pours his mind-control drug into the reservoir; you know it is not going to end well you are just waiting to see how poorly.

On Dec. 5, Denver officials held a sustainability summit. Just before the meeting got underway, the Colorado branch of the Sunrise Movement, which says it is fighting climate change, distributed a fake communique on Denver city letterhead to attendees and on Twitter, apologizing that Suncor, the Canadian energy company, was a summit sponsor, and declaring a climate emergency. Michele Weindling, a coordinator with Sunrise Colorado, told Colorado Public Radio that fighting to address climate change was more important than disinformation.

And that is how you poison yourself.

See the original post:
Our view: Democrats join the fake news biz - The Journal

My unique upbringing in the Youtube Generation – Johns Hopkins News-Letter

Jin relects on the impact that Youtube had on her in her childhoood and in her life now

I. Worn green leather, soggy black floors. The majority of my time spent on a public school bus commuting to school everyday, was spent watching YouTube.

In one of the academic middle school summer camps my mom put me in, a couple guys in our class were always huddled around a laptop, laughing about ninjas and green balls.

After a couple days of being confused, I decided to join them.

To my surprise, I saw an Asian American guy on their screen. Granted, he seemed kind of insane, but he was funny, and after getting into his videos, he made my admittedly unenjoyable camp experience much brighter than before.

After that summer, the second generation iPod Touch I got secondhand from a cousin became so much more than a music player.

Through YouTube, I found more Asian Americans who did things I thought Asian Americans werent supposed to do: short-form comedy (Nigahiga), confronting stereotypes (KevJumba) or performing music (Sam Tsui).

I also found introverts who could express themselves online by doing silly things, whether it be choose your own adventure videos (WheazyWaiter) or making Doctor Who-inspired rock (Charlieissocoollike).

One guy in my grade even started his own lets play channel, where he provided commentary while playing Minecraft.

And when girls in eighth-grade algebra started making the Vulcan salute in the hallways, I knew that they were Nerdfighters like me.

That is, part of a global community that sprung up around the VlogBrothers channel (one of the brothers being John Green, author of The Fault in Our Stars) that strives to combat mediocrity and negativity (world suck) through education, fundraising for humanitarian causes and other collaborative events.

So even though Id spent most of my bus rides looking down at my iPod, sitting on those green leather seats, I never really felt alone.

II. Three things in September of 2015: Martin Shkreli admitted to raising the price of Daraprim by 5,000 percent, two shows (The Daily Show with Trevor Noah, and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert) began airing to low ratings, and I started my exchange year in Germany.

By the time Id entered high school, my YouTube feed started to expand beyond people in their rooms talking to a camera.

The VlogBrothers had started their Crash Course series, breaking down subjects from psychology to literature. Video essayists allowed me to learn about things beyond my school curriculum.

After watching the film Snowpiercer, I learned how Bong Joon-ho expressed permanent choice visually through Every Frame a Painting, and how he embodied the artist as a historian through the channel Nerdwriter1.

YouTube became a place for me to not only connect with introverts who did silly things, but a place to learn about current events and the world.

The remote segments from Conan OBriens TBS show take his audience on hilarious, informative and humanizing adventures around the globe. Taking AP U.S. History had made me more politically curious, and Id started watching John Oliver and Jon Stewart on YouTube to learn about current events before Id left for Germany.

And while I was there, it was watching shows like The Daily Show and The Late Show through YouTube that connected me to life back home.

Though the content I consumed was taking a more serious turn, the function of YouTube had remained the same: It was a way to brighten my day, whether that came from a kid in her room doing impressions or a full-budget production making light of Shkreli.

III. The Daily Show format political satire in the guise of a regular talk show has been adopted by comedians worldwide.

If you like international studies or enjoy political comedy, watching these programs (which often have subtitles) on YouTube are a great way to laugh and learn about comparative politics.

For example, the Heute-Show (Today Show) helped me process the election of a far-right party in Germany, Al-Bernameg (The Show) introduced me to the very real problems of former Egyptian President Morsi and Zondag met Lubachs (Sunday with Lubach) comedic appeal to Trump through an introduction of the Netherlands started a wave of parodies by daily shows worldwide.

I spent the summer before my sophomore year in college in Taiwan.

When I asked local friends if any Taiwanese daily shows had appeared yet, they told me no but that a young biologist-turned-comedian was interested in starting one.

That summer, The Night Night Show with Brian Tseng launched on YouTube.

It was rough: The American comedic style that Brian used wasnt landing well with Taiwanese audiences, and as an independent production consisting of fresh college graduates, you could tell that everything wasnt as polished as it could be.

Last week, after three seasons of The Night Night Show, Brian closed his curtains. His production had evolved from a small internet community of young Taiwanese viewers who enjoyed American late night, to a household name and a key platform for all three major candidates of the Taiwanese presidential election.

I watched the last episode while sitting in Bamboo Cafe. Some guy whod looked over my shoulder approached me and said, Are you Taiwanese? Dont cry. Hell start something again soon.

IV. As part of the YouTube generation, YouTube has played a huge role in my upbringing.

Im honestly in awe of the fact that I can send videos to friends at Hopkins and around the world so easily.

Nowadays, my YouTube feed is no longer filled with prank videos, game commentary or people doing silly things.

Late night still takes up a large part of my recommendations. I watch a lot of foreign news channels (from the German Tagesschau or Japanese NHK) to process American politics through foreign eyes.

The video essayists I watch are more theatrical and politically pointed: Baltimore-based ContraPoints, for example, has reportedly deradicalized members of the alt-right.

I also try my best to consume both right- and left-wing commentators on YouTube. YouTube has become a place for me to get information, rather than pure entertainment.

Those who dont understand the YouTube phenomenon often criticize the parasocial relationship between YouTubers and their audience; They criticize that independent YouTubers abuse the trust their (often young, impressionable) viewers have in them to sell products or promote harmful behaviors.

Many also cite YouTubes algorithm as a rabbit hole for political radicalization.

YouTube, its creators and certainly its audiences are far from perfect.

But YouTube can still be a great place to brighten peoples days, to learn about the world and people different from oneself, and to gain access to a community of people you might not find in your local area.

As much as YouTube can radicalize, YouTube can also de-radicalize.

YouTubers are also mandated to tell audiences if theyre being sponsored, harmful behavior is usually called out by other YouTubers and most people seem to outgrow the content they consumed in the past.

My community of middle school YouTube fans are all working hard at great colleges across the country.

YouTubers move on too. KevJumba became a monk; Nigahiga invited Andrew Yang on his podcast; and Every Frame a Painting ended their channel. YouTube has become a much larger community than it was 10 years ago.

I remember when one million subscribers was a huge milestone, and everyone in the mill-sub-club knew and collaborated with each other. Nowadays, I struggle to connect with (or even identify) the popular YouTubers of today.

Before Charlieissocoollike left YouTube to become a screenwriter, he made a song in 2012 called No Time to Reply.

The song epitomizes the feelings many subscribers had written to him and ends by saying, I think that Im done / Youre not just for me now / But Ive had fun.

Though his channel is no longer active, the middle-schooler within me who found a friend in his introversion and love for Doctor Who still hopes that hell come back someday.

Continued here:
My unique upbringing in the Youtube Generation - Johns Hopkins News-Letter

Letters and feedback: Feb. 5, 2020 – Florida Today

Florida Today Published 4:00 a.m. ET Feb. 5, 2020

'I've never felt as hopeless' about our government

Marco Rubio said, "Just because actions meet a standard of impeachment does not mean it is in the best interest of the country to remove a president from office."

How is it that a president's actions can meet a standard of impeachment, yet it still is in our country's best interest that he remains in office? The partisan nature of this impeachment has nothing to do with the actions taken by the House and everything to do with the Republican party's mishandling of the situation.

I'm 27, and I have never felt as hopeless about our government and the future of our democracy. I'm incredibly disappointed that the Senate has voluntarily given up the ability to conduct a fair and impartial trial based on evidence and facts. The people of Florida and America deserve the truth. We deserve a competent, ethical president and a functioning system of checks and balances, yet the last three years have proven that we have neither.

Donald Trump lost the popular vote by 3million, the Senate is set up in a way that allows Republicans to hold the majority despite receiving fewer votes, and the judicial system has been flooded with Trump appointees who will affect our country for decades. All of this is in spite of the will of the majority of the country. Our democracy has failed us, and Marco Rubio has failed his constituents.

Alyssa Shelton, Titusville

Lead House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., speaks during closing arguments in the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump on Monday.(Photo: AP)

The 'impeachment farce'draws to a close

Finally, the witch huStories nt is almost over.

Yes, boys and girls the impeachment farce is almost over. Remember, this farce began beforeTrump was even sworn into office. By the time Trump took office "The Swamp" had already started an investigation. The two-plus-year Mueller investigation was a big nothing burger but it did expose the corruption in our intelligence agencies. The investigation continues but it won't be good for coup leaders.

After that failure, Rep. Schiff conducted super-secret hearings with numerous witnesses that offered opinions but no proof. With that "evidence,"Schiff claimed he had conclusive proof that Trump should be impeached. When the two articles of impeachment were sent to the Senate, the House managerstook 24 hours to explain them when it could have been summed up in five minutes. But they tortured the public with repetitious blather.

The impeachment committee continued sputtering along and used a phone call between Trump and the newly elected Ukraine president regarding U.S.aid and known corruption in Ukraine. Since then the public has seen a video of Vice President Biden demanding that a Ukrainian fraud prosecutor be fired before he would give Ukraine $5 billion. Hmm.

With a sinking ship, Schiff got a tip that an upcoming book would expose Trump and salvage his ill-attempted coup and he demanded more witnesses. But what happened to that "conclusive proof,"hundreds of pages of sworn testimony from the 17 witnesses he already had interrogated?

Let voters decide in November.

Jack Ward, Melbourne

Trial reflects country's 'sad state of affairs'

The recent dog and pony show also known as the impeachment trial accurately reflects the sad state of affairs in which our country has found itself. Acquittal of Trump was a foregone conclusion before the House began its investigation. Party line voting is now how things are done. It is why Senate Leader McConnell wouldn't even allow Obama to nominate someone for the Supreme Court. The Senate was going to say no, even if King Solomon was the nominee.

Here is where things get really bad and why our country is the most divided since the Civil War. Trump blocked testimony, not unlike what dictators do. The GOP didn't want to hear more testimony fearing the wrath of Trump (also typical of dictatorships). They didn't want to hear anything that might cause them to rethink their decisions. It was as if the GOP and their constituents put their hands over their ears and yelled "Waahhh!" I can assure you that if the tables were turned, the GOP would be going ballistic.

The Senate does not accurately reflect what the majority of Americans want. The low-populated state of Wyoming has the same power as our most highly populated states. GOP senators represent millions and millions fewer people than their Democrat counterparts, yet they are in control. We are not a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people but rather a nation of the states, by the states, and for the states. We may just perish.

Les Forster, Melbourne

Choosing'Party of Trump' over moralintegrity

Since when is making a moral judgment partisan? And since when is it better for our country to keep a corrupt president in office than to restore our constitutional democracy?

Both of our Florida senators have chosen to side with the Party of Trump over moral integrity. They agree that Trump has attempted to harm our foreign policy by bribing a foreign government for personal gain, and that he has obstructed Congress' investigation. And yet they want to retain a president who promoted violence even before his election, lied to the people over 15,000 times, verbally approves the alt-right's racist and anti-Semitic actions, undermines our own government agencies and public education, tears apart families seeking asylum and reverses environmental protections.

Our opposition to this president is not partisan. It is true that we can vote him out of office, but if our senators refuse to put a stop to his destructive behavior through impeachment, they are setting a precedent for allowing future presidents to follow suit. Sens.Rubio and Scott, I ask you not to follow your party's orders. Do us proud and choose right over political gain.

Bonnie Ida, Melbourne

Read or Share this story: https://www.floridatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/02/05/letters-and-feedback-feb-5-2020/4632549002/

Originally posted here:
Letters and feedback: Feb. 5, 2020 - Florida Today

The epidemic of racism in news coverage of the coronavirus and the public response – EUROPP – European Politics and Policy

The coronavirus outbreak that originated in Wuhan, China is not (yet) a pandemic, according to the WHO, but its spread has been accompanied by reports of racism and xenophobia from around the world.Jonathan Corpus Ongof the University of Massachusettsand Gideon Lascoof the University of the Philippinesargue that more needs to be done to stop the spread of prejudice in the wake of the outbreak.

The way we understand illness is rarely defined by science alone. That is particularly evident when there are gaps in scientific knowledge cliche and prejudice fill the void. Narratives of karmic debts, secret conspiracies, and depraved deviants offer the most irresistible explanation. To paraphrase the late media scholar Roger Silverstone, stereotypical frames offer comfort as they help contain catastrophe. In our fractious times, misinformation spread wittingly and unwittingly through the media and online further exacerbates dangerous fallacies.

We see this today both in media coverage and the public response to the coronavirus outbreak. Overnight, to be from Hubei province or even just to be Chinese is to be a dangerous other to be shunned, banned from entry, and even blamed for the outbreak. In a matter of days, millions of mostly healthy people have found themselves trapped in their own homes and unwelcome anywhere else.Residents of Hubei tearfully plead exit from lockdown in order to access services such as cancer treatment unavailable in their locale.

As social scientists, we fear that such dangerous narratives are encouraging racism and hate by portraying vulnerable populations as virulent carriers, rather than victims worthy of empathy and sympathy. This applies of course to Western/global media coverage of an exotic disease arising from dirty and distant lands. But crucially, we want to point out how this othering of mainland Chinese people is also painfully felt within and among Asian countries, as social tensions in the region have escalated in response to Chinas political and economic aggressions.

Global media coverage such as in this article in Foreign Policy , framed the outbreak as a consequence of the Belt and Road Initiative, essentially blaming Xi Jinping who made it possible for a local disease to become global menace. Meanwhile UK tabloids Daily Mail and The Sun (infamous for their anti-immigration headlines) shared conspiracy theories and invited revulsion towards eating bats and other animals, implying that the Chinese people are to blame for the outbreak. Never mind that bats are consumed in many parts of the world, from Africa to Oceania.

This is not a new phenomenon. The SARS epidemic was met with similar responses, including the perpetuation of Asian stereotypes. The scare over the Ebola virus was likewise laden with prejudice against Africans. As Donald Trumps tweets during those times show (e.g. Stop the EBOLA patients from entering the U.S. Treat them, at the highest level, over there. THE UNITED STATES HAS ENOUGH PROBLEMS!), it can lead to unwarranted actions and further incite panic.

Across Asia, hostility toward proximal Chinese others is also widely normalized. In Hong Kong, the Twitter account Free with Hong Kong whose bio includes Fight for Freedom posted pictures of Chinese restaurants serving newborn mice and bat soup to diners with the hashtags #chinazi and #WuhanCoronaVirus. Political resistance might be moral justification for such incendiary tweets, but this betrays both bigotry and amnesia. The SARS epidemic of 2003 is widely suspected to have originated from civet cat in the Cantonese province of Guangdong, bordering Hong Kong. This intra-ethnic hostility between Hong Kongers and mainland Chinese has steadily escalated over the years as mainlanders have long been referred to by the slur locust. This mockery has played out against a broader political battle for sovereignty from Beijing.

In the Philippines, Chinas territorial encroachment of the South China Sea not to mention Rodrigo Dutertes increasingly cozy ties with Beijing have triggered political and cultural resentments, many of which have been projected onto mainland Chinese tourists and workers. In the recent election of 2019, opposition politicians and influencers seeking political leverage fanned the flames of anti-China sentiment through emotionally manipulative memes and racist speech.

Philippine responses to the coronavirus have been similarly hostile. On Facebook, a transport blogger recently shared a screenshot of a ride-share driver refusing to serve mainland Chinese clients with the message, If you are Chinese national you are not welcome because all of have Wuhan virus [sic]. Instead of calling this out as unacceptable, the bloggers resigned caption simply was: Too harsh? Or fair enough?

Other influencers have peddled conspiracy theory from alt-right news sites such as The Washington Times (also known for promoting climate change denial), insinuating the virus might be Beijings secret biological weapon to undermine their political and territorial rivals.

What can we do better? Both journalists and the general public can do better by amplifying stories that recognise the agency of doctors and responders on the ground, and sharing (and verifying) stories and videos produced by ordinary people in Wuhan. These stories remind us that the outbreak is experienced most exceptionally as a tragedy, by people who both mainstream news and fake news sites have dehumanised.

We can also read and share this excellent resource started at the University of Connecticut on Treating Yellow Peril: Resources to Address Coronavirus Racism to journalists and students, as it helps us trace root causes to the current hysteria, but also reflect on factors that have led to the increased normalization of both protectionist and shamelessly racist expressions in everyday discourse.

Before sharing and posting clickbait articles, its healthy to engage with the roots of our prejudice and our selective empathy. Are we conflating the Chinese government, whose past or present actions we may object to, with the Chinese people? What lessons should we heed from previous epidemics of SARS, Ebola, and even AIDS and the secondary catastrophe of discrimination and social shaming that they have inflicted to particular communities? And how do we double-down on nurturing a cosmopolitan imagination in the current state of fear and anxiety in global society?

This is an updated version of a post that was published last week on OpenDemocracy.This article represents the views of the author, and not the position of the Media@LSE blog, nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Featured image:Photo byKyle GlennonUnsplash

Originally posted here:
The epidemic of racism in news coverage of the coronavirus and the public response - EUROPP - European Politics and Policy