Archive for the ‘Alt-right’ Category

The Reinvention of the Latin American Right – NACLA

This piece appeared in the Spring 2023 issue of NACLA's quarterly print magazine, the NACLA Report. Subscribe in print today!

In November 2022, key figures of the Latin America Right gathered at an upscale hotel in Mexico City. On stage, the main organizer, Eduardo Verstegui, a Mexican actor, producer, and former advisor to Donald Trump on policies concerning the Latino community, gifted a Mexican football jersey to Brazilian lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro, son of the then-outgoing president. The jerseys number, 27, alluded to Bolsonaro as a possible presidential candidate in Brazil's 2027 elections. As Verstegui harshly attacked the Left and the administration of President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador, Bolsonaro in turn praised him as a potential far-right candidate in Mexicos 2024 elections, eliciting cheers from the crowd. For Verstegui, the conference represented conservative unity at a time when the true Right found itself orphaned.

The rallying force behind the event was the U.S.-based Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). In addition to Bolsonaro, the hundreds of attendees included defeated Chilean presidential candidate Jos Antonio Kast and Argentine libertarian economist and presidential hopeful Javier Milei. Mexico was represented by clerics, former legislators from the center-right Partido Accin Nacional (PAN), and anti-abortion activists.

Former Colombian president lvaro Uribe gave a short and lackluster address, while Senator Mara Fernanda Cabal, a rising star of the Colombian Right who was introduced to the audience as the iron maiden against communism, gave a fiery one. Ghosts from the past were present as well, such as Ramfis Domnguez-Trujillo, grandson of Dominican despot Rafael Trujillo, and Zury Ros, current Guatemalan presidential candidate and daughter of convicted genocidaire General Efran Ros Montt.

U.S. political figures made appearances, most via videoconference. Propagandist Steve Bannon, Senator Ted Cruz, former U.S. ambassador to Mexico Chris Landau, conservative pundit Jack Posobiec, and CPAC's leading power couple Matt and Mercedes Schlapp all boasted about the growing strength of the conservative cause across the Americas. Even Donald Trump delivered a short, rather tepid video message, which the audience nevertheless noisily applauded. Europe, too, had a small but meaningful representation. A message from Santiago Abascal, head of the Spanish party Vox, met a warm reception, while Polish anticommunist icon Lech Walesa delivered a rambling keynote address that was not nearly as combative as those of his U.S. and Latin American peers.

CPAC Mexico was an occasion for reckoning. Contrary to the optimism that followed Trumps and Bolsonaros elections and the fall of Evo Morales in Bolivia, recent defeats in Chile, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Honduras, and Brazil seem to have put right-wing forces against the ropes. Yet these losses have galvanized conservatives, who, like they have in the past, are turning to internationalism to bolster their rise. Even in defeat, recent elections across the continent reveal that right-wing platforms are not only viable, but popular and capable of rallying grassroots and elite sectors, building coalitions, and gaining power in local and national arenas.

Three decades after the end of the Cold War and the consolidation of a widespread consensus supporting electoral democracy, the Old Right has sprung back as a seemingly good faith participant in the democratic game. This right wing sits at a crossroads. Given the decline of established center-right parties like Venezuelas COPEI or Chiles Christian Democratic Party over the past 20 years, a new constellation of hardline conservative actors is uniting internationally against new enemies like globalism, gender ideology, and the gay lobby.

But the roots of their grievances are decades old: their Cold War battles did not collapse with the fall of the Soviet Bloc, but rather they reconfigured in opposition to the 1990 creation of the So Paulo Forum (FSP), a continent-wide alliance of leftist and reformist parties, and with the rise of left-leaning Pink Tide governments in the early 2000s. Old tropes about communist subversion are joined today by warnings against cultural Marxism and its woke, progressive, feminist, and politically correct incarnations.

Fifty years before the CPAC Mexico gathering, Mexico City hosted a different mixture of fervent conservative crusaders. In 1972, the World Anti-Communist League, created in 1966 in the heat of the Vietnam War to foster a united international anticommunist front, held its first meeting outside of Asia. Thanks to its active anticommunist movement, Mexico was chosen as host. Activists welcomed over 300 committed cold warriors to Mexico City from around the world, including officials from Taiwan, Korea, South Vietnam, Guatemala, Paraguay, and Nicaragua; Cuban exiles; former fascist collaborators from Germany, Croatia, and Ukraine; Middle Eastern and African activists; and Latin American clerics and university students, among many others. For the Mexicans, it was a moment of pride and the culmination of decades of domestic and international activism, lobbying, fundraising, and proselytizing.

The WACL was the offspring of the Asian Peoples Anti-Communist League, a 1950s effort by East Asian governments to push back against Cold War neutralism and contain communist China. In the 1970s, as military regimes swept across most of Latin America and initiatives emerged for interstate collaboration against communism, most of them brokered by the United States, entities such as WACL provided spaces for expanding these alliances.

A major ally of the Reagan administration, the WACL became a global platform for U.S. neoconservatives such as Senator Jesse Helms and retired Major General John K. Singlaub, as well as for powerful religious organizations including Korean religious leader Reverend Sun Myung Moons Unification Church. During the 1972 conference in Mexico, Latin American members founded the Latin American Anti-Communist Confederation (CAL), which soon included top civilian and military figures from across the region and became a key component of the multinational state terror initiative known as Operation Condor. The CAL also fueled conflict in Central America with fighters, funding, weapons, and a well-oiled propaganda machine.

While 50 years apart, the 1972 and the 2022 summits in Mexico are kindred spirits. Yet, unlike the East Asian-dominated WACL, CPACs clear center is in the Western Hemisphere, specifically the United States, and it traces its origins to the U.S. New Right of the 1960s and the conservative response to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. But CPAC has become increasingly less U.S.-centric. Meetings in Brazil, Japan, Australia, Hungary, Israel, and now Mexico are evidence of the willingness of Latin American and other global allies to participate in its expanding network.

At CPAC Mexico 2022, Eduardo Bolsonaro and Verstegui repeated Jair Bolsonaros claim that his defeat was the product of electoral frauda favored right-wing tactic for discrediting elections. At the same time, conservatives rejoiced in the defeat of Chiles progressive draft constitution in the September 2022 plebiscite, which Jos Antonio Kast previously deemed a victory against the ideology and the violence of the few. In the political world the Right inhabits, the battle has just begun and is as wide and hostile as they ever imagined it.

Right-Wing Resistance?

In recent years, the idea of resistance has become central to the Rights political imagination. According to journalist and researcher Pablo Stefanoni, the Rights success in positioning itself as the rebel victim of a globalist-progressive establishment allows it to compete with the Left in being outraged about reality and propose ways to transform it. For Stefanoni, the phenomenon is related to the fact that the Left has stopped reading the Right, while the Right, at least the alt-right, reads and discusses the Left. While arguable and perhaps simplifying, this perspective has been borne out at CPACs Latin American summits: the Right is evidently adept at constructing an image of their leftist-progressive enemies, in picking apart and weaponizing their discourse, and in capitalizing on anti-establishment rhetoric to position their pro-life, pro-business, pro-traditional family messages in mainstream channels and among a sizable support base.

Claims about a political landscape in which globalism and nationalism have displaced left and right distinctions often ring hollow in the ears of these conservatives. Despite its different tendencies, the Right is trying to build a clear sense of unity against its enemies. On stage at CPAC Mexico, combative taunting of zurdos (lefties), progres (progressives) and la derechita cobarde (the petty cowardly Right) combined with a slew of calls to defend free enterprise, private property, the traditional family, and life from conception on. Religious slogans such as Viva Cristo Rey (Long Live Christ the King) and appeals to defend Christianity and religious freedom abounded. Messages about combat, battle, and struggle against globalisma malleable term that often encompasses the Left, feminism, and LGBTQI+ groupsare key to the Rights discursive arsenal.

Read the rest of this article, available open access for a limited time.

Luis Herrn-vila is a historian of the Cold War in Latin America and assistant professor of history at the University of New Mexico. His research focuses on Mexican and other Latin American conservative, anticommunist, and extreme right movements.

Read the original post:
The Reinvention of the Latin American Right - NACLA

Pentagon leaks: how much damage will they cause? – The Guardian US

Pentagon leaks 2023

The worst US national security breach in years could help Moscow and prompt friction with Washingtons allies

Thu 13 Apr 2023 07.38 EDT

A large batch of leaked classified US government information, including top-secret briefings, have been discovered online over the past week, with many relating to perhaps the most sensitive arena of intelligence gathering in the world today: Russias invasion of Ukraine.

The most significant parts of the leak concern Kyivs level of preparedness for an expected counteroffensive, but there are plenty of lines about other countries involvement in the conflict that may cause serious diplomatic difficulties. Here are some of the key revelations so far:

Ukraine: US intelligence officials were pessimistic in February about Ukraines prospects for a new attack in the spring, saying Kyiv could fall well short of recapturing territory seized by Russia. There are also details of serious air defence shortages and a risk of running out of anti-aircraft missiles completely by May.

Russia: The leaks suggest the US has a remarkable level of insight into Russian military operations, with live information about the targets being attacked by Moscow and details of a plan to pay a bonus to soldiers who damage or destroy Nato tanks. Early on Thursday, the New York Times reported that a new batch of 27 pages shows that the depth of the infighting inside the Russian government appears broader and deeper than previously understood. There is also information on the Russian mercenary Wagner groups plan to expand its operations in Haiti, as well as US use of advanced satellite imaging technology to gather intelligence on Russian forces.

UK: One document suggests 97 special forces operatives were in Ukraine in February and March 50 of them British. Their purpose there is not specified, but it is suggested that the special forces could form part of a coordinated Nato group.

UN: Some documents seen by the BBC appear to describe private conversations between the UN secretary general, Antnio Guterres, and his deputy about a deal to secure the export of grain from Ukraine to help tackle a global food crisis. The files reportedly suggest the US felt Guterres was too sympathetic to Russian interests, saying he was undermining broader efforts to hold Moscow accountable for its actions in Ukraine.

South Korea: Documents based in part on intercepted communications show Seoul grappling with US pressure to ship ammunition to Ukraine amid concerns that artillery shells requested by Washington for its own use could be passed on. South Korea has a longstanding policy of not providing lethal weapons to countries at war.

Israel: Another document says the Mossad intelligence agency encouraged its staff to take part in protests over Benjamin Netanyahus plans to weaken the independence of Israels judiciary. The Mossad has denied those claims. There is also an assessment of scenarios in which Israel could be persuaded to provide weapons to Ukraine.

The worst national security breach in the US for years appears to have emerged through a video game messaging platform, where it was posted during an argument about the war in Ukraine.

The documents initially emerged on servers hosted by the gaming focused app Discord. They first appeared in a chatroom devoted to games, music and orthodox Christianity and replete with racist memes called Thug Shaker Central, then in another devoted to a Filipino YouTuber called WowMao. In early March they popped up on yet another server, Minecraft Earth Map, where a user who had been debating the war posted 10 of the files with the message: Here, have some leaked documents.

After that disorienting origin story, two versions of the cache of files appeared elsewhere. One was posted on 4chan, a conspiratorial online message board where the alt-right movement is thought to originate. Another, which analysts say included an edited image with inaccurate casualty figures, was shared on pro-Russian Telegram channels.

US media reports quote officials who say that while versions of some of the documents seem to have been doctored after they were uploaded to the internet, they mostly appear to be authentic. The Washington Post reported that a defence official said the documents appear to have been collated for top US military leaders including Gen Mark Milley, chair of the joint chiefs of staff, but that others with the right security clearances could also have accessed them.

On Wednesday night, the Post reported that the original source of the files on Thug Shaker Central was the groups administrator, a man it called OG, who worked on a military base and appeared in a video shouting a series of racial and antisemitic slurs into the camera, then [firing] several rounds at a target.

The Post also reports there are about 300 photographs of files in the leak, three times as many as were previously thought to be circulating.

There is some evidence that corroborates the case they were leaked rather than hacked: they appear to be pictures of documents that had been folded up and perhaps stuffed in the perpetrators pocket. The images show the documents laid on top of magazines surrounded by items including nail clippers and super glue, next to a book with a picture that looks like the scope of a hunting rifle.

The nature of the US assessment of Ukraines military readiness is bound to cause friction between Kyiv and Washington, while the detailed picture it presents of the intelligence gathered in Russia is likely to help Moscow take countermeasures to make it more difficult to obtain with human sources potentially at risk.

There is another problem for the US: the leak appears to show that it spies on some of its allies. That has caused ructions in South Korea and Israel, while CNN reported diplomats from multiple countries saying they planned to raise the matter with Washington.

It may not be surprising that in its public statements, the US is more focused on condemning the leak and identifying its source. Lloyd Austin, the US defence secretary, has vowed to turn over every rock to do so.

There are plenty of tools to do that, from time stamps on documents that appear to show when they were printed to registers of who has viewed the documents. If identified, the culprit could face a lengthy jail sentence. But whatever happens, even the might of the US government has no power to remove the documents from circulation.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

More:
Pentagon leaks: how much damage will they cause? - The Guardian US

Frog Decor Is Living in My Head Rent-Free – Architectural Digest

Whether or not youre leaping for it, frogs are having a moment and it is our sacred duty to oblige. From Susan Alexandrasfrog-themed Passover collection to the Collina Strada x Redouxfrog candle and these $510frog shoes from JW Anderson and Wellipets, the frog motif is the new frontier in home decor. (Theres even a song on the new 100 gecs album calledFrog on the Floor in case youve been seeking a replacement for all thoseCrazy Frog bangers that defined the aughts.) To me thistrend feels like a natural progression from cottagecore as people feel inspired to further explore their most feral forest fantasies.

View more

Did you know that theres a frog decor tag onWayfair? The hashtag for #frogcore has accumulated 90.3 million views onTikTok while Instagram has 137,000 posts and counting. As one of the tentpoles ofgoblincore, the frog is a mythical creature with origins that can be traced back toancient folklore and fairy tales. According toSave the Frogs, a nonprofit organization dedicated to amphibian conservation,early Aztec civilizations viewed the toad as the earth mother goddess, who governed the cycle of death and rebirth.Based on what I could dissect from the Internet, these amphibians embody wealth, abundance, and loss preventionseeing as to how we find ourselves in the midst of arecession, we could certainly benefit from more of that energy in our lives. Hillary Taymour, founder of Collina Strada, also notes that frogs symbolize wisdom, intuition, humble power, and potential in many cultures.

This Russian frog sculpture that doubles as a box was part of the late Truman Capotes zoo of miniature animal sculptures on view inside his New York City apartment.

As someone who has always had a soft spot forfrogs (Frog and Toad, Kermit, and Pepe before he was tragically seized by the alt-right), Im delighted to see thefrogcore aesthetic unfold. Its no secret thatIve kissed my fair share of toads in this lifetime, but you might be surprised to learn that I went through a frog phase during my childhood. I even had a pet tree frog named Tiny, a birthday gift I got when I was in the fifth grade. (Im still devastated by the unsolved case of his disappearance which occurred while I was at themall with my friends. All signs point to my dadonly he knows what happened on that fateful day and he refuses to fess up.) While the moment was fleeting, the exhilarating feeling has never been forgottenthis pivotal scene from the Royal BalletsTales of Beatrix Potter really captures the vibe. (Other fond memories include dining at the shuttered restaurant chain Rib-It which feels like afever dream.)

Im now convinced that my frog fascination was partially reawakened when Instagram started targeting me with memes from @frogwitch throughout the pandemic, and once you open that box, its a slippery slope! Is reverse gatekeeping a thing? Because I would happily force my passion and love for frogs and toads onto everyone if given the chance, saysMandee Klahn, the artist behind the popular silly frog art account. The Indiana native recalls how herotherworldly connection with the cute critters began during childhood when she would catch and release frogs in the retention ditch that separated her backyard from a cornfield.

A frog meme that reads Please do not ask what I am doing, I am still not sure if I even exist.

A toad meme that reads No email has ever found me well.

I dont think anyone from the Midwest can deny that the sound of amphibians croaking was the unofficial sound of summer break, Mandee writes in an email. I dont want to speak for all people, but I think a lot of humansincluding myselfare currently craving the carefree feelings of childhood. Frogs and toads are just part of that.

Hillary has been using flora and fauna as the base for all of the Collina Strada collections since launching her label in 2008, so the inclusion of frogs was welcome with their diversity of colors, sizes, and patterns. (At the moment, her personal favorite is the lipstick false dart frog.) I used to catch tadpoles in creeks around my house when I was little so I guess I was always into frogs, the designer recalls in an email. Im happy for frogs, they deserve the spotlight! I love involving fun, pet-like elements into my wardrobes. Why not carry afrog bag?

A campaign image for the Redoux x Collina Strada frog candle collaboration.

The pink baby frog candle is infused with Redouxs cult favorite 529 scent.

Despite having a long history of spreading good fortune, there is also a dark side to frogs and toads that needs to be addressed. Europeans, Egyptians, and Jews associated them with plagues, droughts, and pure evil. This narrative was the inspiration forSusan Alexandras latest collection which features frog decor in the form of candlesticks, ramekins, wine glasses, napkin rings, and seder plates. Im partial to all pond critters, but frogs to me are extra adorable, she writes in an email. Ive been leaning into the frog motif in my designs partially due to what they represent from a fairy tale perspective (frog prince!) and also because of what they stand for in terms of Passover.

Playing on the plague of frogs theme that is affiliated with the holiday, the designer was dazzled by the idea of something as serious and sacred as a seder plate featuring the joyful frog ramekins and matching frog wine glasses. In the press release, Susan also mentioned that its healing to be able to shift the narrative around the past and find humor in darkness.

Back in 1969, visitors were greeted by a ceramic frog at the front foyer of photographer Max Eckerts house.

Of the many things thatJacqueline Kennedy Onassis is idolized for, her obsession withJean Rogers cartoonish frog planters remains high up on my list, along with thelettucewareand her stamp of approval is top-tier! One of my favorite finds within this niche category is thisGoodnight Frog puzzle by the artistMaybelle Equay. We cant glaze over the fact that frog art has insane range, Mandee argues. It can be extremely kitschy to everything in between to serious. There is truly something that appeals to everyone. Range like the little old lady that is collecting frogs made of seashells that she gets from various beach town gift shops to the person that is hanging professional macro photography of frogs from the rainforest in their new condo to the person with the MILF: Man I Love Frogs bumper sticker on their Honda Accord.

All I know is that once you embrace the weird, whimsical world of the frog, something inside you starts glowing. Perhaps the pathtoward finding inner peace is a process of curating the pond within? Even though we cycle through creature trends, like the very chic shrimp kitsch of 2022, Susan firmly believes that2023 is the year of the frog. I think there are groups of us who like to have fun with splashing semi absurdist themes all over clothes and accessories, and I happen to be one of them.

Small Antique Fiddling Frog Advertising Lithograph Print

Harlequin Wood Frog Wallpaper Roll

Wallpaper Republic Amazonian Frogs Wallpaper

Scalamandre Calabassas Frog Island Cloth Fabric

Urban Outfitters Cowboy Frog Bath Mat

Collina Strada x Redoux Small Pink Frog Candle

Susan Alexandra Frog Glasses

Mackenzie Childs Frog Salt & Pepper Set

Chairish Limoges Rochard Porcelain Frog Trinket Box

Vintage Italian Art Pottery Frog Candlestick

Bordallo Pinheiro Green Frogs Embossed Serving Salad Bowl

Frog Serving Platter & Utensils

Frog on Lily Pad Decoupage Glass Plate

Vintage Frog Ceramic Tea Set

Vintage Carousel Frog

Mackenzie Childs Fergal the Frog Butler

See the original post here:
Frog Decor Is Living in My Head Rent-Free - Architectural Digest

Five Ways to Have More Constructive Disagreements – Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley

Earlier this March, a professor at Palm Beach Atlantic University, a private Christian institution in Florida, lost his job after a parent complained about a racial justice unit in his course. He had taught that same unit for 12 years.

Also in March, a conservative judge, invited to speak by Stanford Law Schools chapter of the Federalist Society, was shouted down by students who said his court rulings caused harm to LGBTQ+ students, and that giving him a platform on campus compromised their safety. The law schools associate dean for diversity, equity, and inclusion took the mic during the protest to question whether the talk was worth the pain . . . and the division that this causes?

That same week, on the opposite coast, South Carolina lawmakers battled over whether to stop funding diversity, equity, and inclusion programs at state colleges. These are only some of the political controversies on college campuses that have made national news this month.

Schools and campuses have often been the battleground for American culture wars. From debates about teaching evolution to racial segregation, interested parties with diverging ideologies have sought to influence school curricula, policies, and practices. These ideological tensions show up as efforts to ban books and disqualify curricular resources containing disputed subject matter. Schools have fired educators from both sides of the political spectrum for expressing political views in the classroom and on social media.

Is there a better way for us to navigate our disagreements? At the Constructive Dialogue Institute, our goal is to help people communicate across lines of difference and work together to solve complex problems. In todays political climate, divisions may feel insurmountable. But the results from our new online learning program suggest there is reason for hope.

When we founded the Constructive Dialogue Institute in 2017, we were alarmed by what appeared to be rapidly rising political tension across communities, including education. At that time, our cofounderssocial psychologist Jonathan Haidt and social entrepreneur Caroline Mehlwere both at New York University Stern School of Business. They, like other educators, felt the impact of national politics flooding college campuses. Conservative student groups were inviting alt-right speakers, and liberal student groups were resorting to shout-downs and protests to silence the same speakers. In some instances, tensions peaked to the point of violence. In classrooms, discussions ranging from corporate responsibility to gender identity and gay marriage were devolving into shouting matches.

The conflict created an almost unbearable sense of tension around campus, where staff, students, and faculty alike felt they were walking on eggshells. Many, understandably, chose to steer clear of any controversial topics; it was the safer choice. But that response seemed to undermine something fundamental, core, and sacred to higher education. Isnt college precisely the place to encounter new ideas and explore diverse viewpoints? At one time or another, havent we all questioned our belief systems, identity labels, and affiliations? Its a critical part of self-exploration and figuring out our place and purpose in the world.

We were also afraid that what we witnessed on campuses was tapping into deeply wired and detrimental human tendencies to seek comfort and only associate with those who mirror ourselves. Evolutionary psychologists have been aware of the human instinct for tribalism for decadespeople intuitively define the world through us versus them, with tribes relentlessly jostling for status.

Throughout Haidts career, his research centered on these topics. He uncovered how polarization develops and the solutions used by groups and societies to navigate conflict. There seemed to be a way out through behavioral science: The answer was that collaboration and problem solving across differences become more possible when people use dialogue and reframe their conversation goals as achieving mutual understanding, rather than winning.

Not all issues lend easily to compromise, and not all problems have neatly packaged solutions. But we believe that adopting tools to practice dialogue and learn about the root of our ideological differences is a feasible way to learn, work, and live together thoughtfully, even in the face of challenges.

In an effort to make those tools available to more people, we distilled the key ideas from behavioral science into an online learning program, called Perspectives, made of short, interactive lessons (think Noom, but for politics). We pulled from cognitive psychology, moral psychology, political psychology, conflict resolution, negotiation, and mediation. We also provided opportunities for people to pair up with one another and practice communication skills.

In Perspectives, students learn to recognize moral beliefs that they share, even with people they disagree with. They review research findings indicating that most Americans have distorted perceptions of the other side. They learn to ask questions to understand each other, share the life experiences that have shaped their views, and establish a collaborative goal with others even when in conflict.

To test whether Perspectives worked, we recruited 775 college students across 10 courses at three U.S. universities. We randomly assigned some students to take Perspectives and some students to not, and we measured their attitudes and beliefs before and after.

The group who took Perspectives were more likely to recognize that their knowledge was limitedsomething psychologists call intellectual humility. They also expressed less contempt for people who were different from them politically. And, finally, they were less likely to verbally attack others when they encountered conflict.

These results mirrored the stories we heard from educators all over the country, who are able to access Perspectives online for free. Instructors have emailed us saying Perspectives was the most impactful thing they did with their students, and that it enabled them to have respectful disagreements about restrictions on free speech on campus, structural inequities, and poverty. One instructor said, Theres too much at stake to not get these conversations right.

Perspectives provided a platform and the skills for students and educators to talk about topics that really matter, and, because of this, it changed the atmosphere of classrooms. Students who were previously silent started talking. Students who were steadfast in their opinions started listening. Students whose emotions boiled learned to take a deep breath before speaking. And they made friendsthese conversations allowed them to pull back layers and get to know each other in a meaningful way.

One student from Waterloo wrote to us: I felt that my [conversation] partner really accepted me and my opinions for who I am, without being judgmental or dismissing. I also feel that I did the same with her. We offered suggestions for improvement and other thought patterns to each other when we took turns sharing. We also found that we shared a lot in common even with our differences.

The most powerful stories came from those who encountered differences. One of our learners is a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) trainer. During one of her training sessions, she encountered resistance from a participant. She wrote to us:

I think old me would have been annoyed, but instead I immediately approached him, and we got into a meaningful conversation about if DEI matters. I asked him a lot of questions to better understand why he didnt feel the content was so relevant to his particular community and I also shared my perspective on why it matters to me and my community. . . . He said he felt [DEI] puts an emphasis on the differences we have rather than the similarities. In my four years here, I never heard that perspective and I am also not sure that me four years ago would have had the skills to try to understand where he was coming from. I completely heard his view that this could be othering and made me wonder if there was a better way . . . we made a true impact on one another and it is the first time in a while I felt like I was able to engage in a productive way with someone who felt so opposite of me. We were so committed to being honest and thoughtful with each other.

We think part of the effectiveness of Perspectives is that the skills are based in psychological science and are useful across multiple facets of lifeat home, at school, and in relationships. We have distilled these into five principles of constructive dialogue:

1. Let go of winning. Approaching a conversation like a zero-sum battle, where one side wins and the other loses, sets up an adversarial dynamic that will lead the other persons defenses to go up. This dynamic minimizes the possibility of learning, and it often damages relationships. Recognize that by striving to win, you are actually setting yourself up for failure. Instead, try entering conversations with intellectual humility, curiosity, and the goal to understand. You will find it can be contagious.

2. Share your story and invite others to do the same. Research from psychology and political science consistently demonstrates that people rarely change their minds about deeply held beliefs because of facts. Rather, sharing stories about personal experiences can be a powerful way to open up new paths of understanding. Focus on discussing issues through your own experience of themwhy an issue is important to you or how an issue affects you. Try to draw out those same insights from others.

3. Ask questions to understand. Expressing intellectual humility through questions is a powerful way to deepen a conversation. But questions can shut down dialogue as easily as they can promote it. Think about the difference between, How can you possibly think that? and Can you tell me more about what led you to this view? The first likely puts someone on the defensive, while the second may open up a new avenue of conversation. Be intentional about asking nonjudgmental questions that invite meaningful reflection.

4. Acknowledge the role of emotions. Often validating someones feelings about an issue can provide a spark that builds into trust and mutual understanding. It is not always easy, though. Imagine acknowledging someones strong emotions about a view you really oppose; for example, I can see that protecting the unborn is really important to you. This can feel quite unnatural. Doing so does not mean youre endorsing their view, but rather it acknowledges the very real feelings they have and makes them feel heard. This can build trust and may lead them to be more open to your perspective.

5. When possible, seek common ground. Common ground can be found in a variety of placesfrom small things like shared interests to large things like shared goals or agreement that a particular value matters. For example, two people who disagree about the solutions to homelessness can still agree that it is an important societal problem. Small or large, the connections that common ground creates can be building blocks for forging strong relationships and identifying additional points of connection.

Since we launched in 2017, we have reached 60,000 learners. Even though these learning modules were developed for college students, a lot of people and communities took an interest. We saw high school teachers, religious organizations, and workplaces searching for solutions to interpersonal problems and finding them in our dialogue tools.

We know there is much more to do. In many ways, the polarization we see in our country is a manifestation of our age-old human problemthe drive to separate ourselves into clans and to prove that our clan is superior to others. The difference is that now, we understand where these instincts come from, and, thankfully, we have some tools that can help.

See the article here:
Five Ways to Have More Constructive Disagreements - Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley

Succession: The real people who inspired the HBO hit – VOGUE India

In April 2019,The New York Times published a three-part investigation about the legacy ofRupert Murdoch that, among a number of juicy revelations, exposed the media moguls attempts to ease tensions among his children through group therapy sessions, including a therapeutic retreat at the family ranch in Australia. Roughly nine months earlier, a very similar scene played out on television screens during the first season ofSuccession. In Austerlitz, the HBO dramas seventh episode, the fictional Roy family begrudgingly gathered in New Mexico for a therapy session after middle son Kendalls failed attempt to knock his father, Logan, from poweronly to discover that the whole gathering was a publicity stunt.

View more

Successions creative team might not have realised they were so closely mirroring reality when they filmed that episode, but the goal has always been to tell a story that felt like it could be happening in real life too. If you read theFinancial Times andWall Street Journal, youd have a good sense of where we thought the show would go because its trying to reflect the world, show creator Jesse ArmstrongtoldThe New Yorker in February, when he also announced thatSuccessions upcoming fourth season would be its last. Indeed, many ofSuccessions characters and plotlines can be traced back to real people and events. Over the years, the show has employed journalists and writersmedia columnistFrank Rich is an executive producer, and novelistGary Shteyngart and business journalistMerissa Marr have served as consultantsto aid in the accuracy of its world-building.

Successions third season ended more than a year ago with the often at-odds Roy siblingsKendall (Jeremy Strong), Shiv (Sarah Snook), and Roman (Kieran Culkin)teaming up to try to stop their father (Brian Cox) from selling the family business. But an eleventh-hour heel turn from Shivs husband, Tom (Matthew Macfadyen), foiled their plans. HBO is keeping a tight lid on the events of the shows final seasonbeyond dropping a few breadcrumbs ina new trailerbut if previous seasons are any indication, there will be more than a few similarities to recent current events. Ahead, a breakdown of the real-world influences for the fictional world ofSuccession.

Jeremy Strong as Kendall Roy, Sarah Snook as Shiv Roy, and Kieran Culkin as Roman Roy.

Armstrong has said that he drew fromseveraldynastic familiesincluding the Redstones, the Sulzbergers, and the Hearstswhen creating the Roys. But none appear to have been more influential than the Murdochs. In fact, Armstrong first beganmining the lives of the rich and powerful for satire with a screenplay calledMurdoch, which imagined the family convening for the birthday of Rupert Murdoch. Itmade the rounds in Hollywood, even landing on the Black List of top unproduced screenplays in2010, but was never made.

Armstronghas said thatMurdoch is deeply in the background ofSuccession,its clear that his work on the former informed the latter. Like the Murdochs, the Roys are a patriarchal family with control over a large media conglomerate. Waystar Royco, which the Roys like to boast is the fifth-largest media company in the world, controls a Fox Newsesque conservative cable network called ATN; several newspapers; and a theme park and cruise ship business. Murdoch, meanwhile, has prevailed over News Corpa powerful print media business whose tentacles reach as far as the UK and Australiaand an entertainment business that, at its height, included broadcast and cable networks, a film and television studio, a live entertainment division, and an Indian television provider.

Even the family structures of the Murdochs and the Roys are similar. Rupert Murdoch has six children from his first three marriages, including an older daughter,Prudence, who has largely avoided wading into the power struggle that has consumed the three children from his second marriage:Elisabeth,Lachlan, andJames. The Roy Family, meanwhile, is made up of oldest son Connor (Alan Ruck)who instead of working for the family business announces a presidential campaign in the second seasonand his three younger siblings, who each believe they have what it takes to succeed their father as CEO of Waystar Royco.

Rupert Murdoch put to rest the succession questions swirling around his family in 2017, when he announced that he would sell much of his entertainment assets to Disney in adeal worth $71.3 billion.Following the sale, his oldest son, Lachlan, was named CEO of adiminished Fox Corp. In season three ofSuccession, Logan made a similar play, revealing that instead of naming one of his children as his successor, he planned to sell the company to (fictional) tech giant GoJo.

Holly Hunter as Rhea Jarrell, and Cherry Jones as Nan Pierce.

The introduction of the Pierce family in season two allowed Armstrong and his creative team to create an old-money foil for the nouveau riche Roys. Led by matriarch Nan Pierce (Cherry Jones), the Pierces operate a multi-billion media company that owns left-leaning news network PGM. Those blue-blooded fucks, as Logan calls them, appear to be a blend ofpublishing families the Sulzbergers and the Bancrofts.

The Sulzberger family owns TheNew York Times, passing the role of publisher down to each new generation. (A.G. Sulzberger is the newspaper of records current publisher.) The Bancrofts, meanwhile, are the Boston socialites who soldWall Street Journal owner Dow Jones & Company to Murdochs News Corporation in 2007. InSuccessions second season, Logan makes his own move to acquire Pierce Global Media, but isnt as successful as his real-life counterpartthough the trailer for season four suggests Nan and her haughty clan will be back for a final showdown.

Alexander Skarsgrd as Lukas Matsson.

ThoughSuccession has occasionally ventured into the world of tech (see Vaulter below), it remained largely focused on legacy media until the introduction ofAlexander Skarsgrds temperamental tech mogul in season three. The billionaire CEO of streaming powerhouse GoJo enters the story first as a potential acquisition target. But by the end of the season, its clear that he has bigger aims from his dealings with the Roys. Because ofSkarsgrds Swedish heritage, themost obvious likely inspiration for his character is Spotify cofounder and CEODaniel Ekeven if GoJo appears to be a mix of Netflix, FanDuel, and Facebook. Matssons ruthless dealmakingand erratic tweetingsuggest hes also modelled at least in part onElon Musk.

Introduced in the third season, during a secretive Republican conclave where the partys leadersincluding Logan and his childrenselect their next presidential candidate, Jeryd Mencken (Justin Kirk) isSuccessions take on what comes afterDonald Trump. The shows sitting presidenta man never shown and only ever referred to as The Raisinseems to be a composite of Trump and a more traditional conservative president, and Gil Eavis (Eric Bogosian), the Democratic senator who wants to hire Shiv in season two, is an apparentBernie Sandersstand-in. Mencken, meanwhile, is an alt-right congressman whom Shiv refers to as a YouTube provocateur, suggesting the writers modelled him after conservative media personalities likeJordan Peterson and members of the far-right Freedom Caucus. Mencken is considered a dark horse in the presidential race until Logan decides to back him, perhaps a reference to Murdochs then close alliance with Trump.

The digital-media start-up that appeared during the first two seasons ofSuccession was so clearly modelled after Vice Media that even the struggling publisher had toacknowledge the similarities. The edgy internet publisher founded by Lawrence Yee (Rob Yang) that sold to Waystar Royco had all the hallmarks of mid-2000s new media brands, from the sleek open floor plan office to the company-owned beehives. Eventhe articles that Vaulter publishes5 Reasons Why Drinking Milk on the Toilet Is Kind of a Game-Changer and Wait, Is Every Taylor Swift Lyric Secretly Marxist?would feel right at home on the BuzzFeed or Gawker websites of yore. And Kendalls interest in the company even provides more evidence that the Roys are inspired by the Murdochs; James Murdochjoined the Vice board in 2013 after Fox acquired a stake in the business.

Though Vaulter doesnt survive its saleor the pivot-to-video era that rocked every major media outletSuccession isnt entirely done skewering the digital-media world. Keep an eye out for a not-so-subtle dig at sites like Axios and Semafor in theupcoming season.

This article first appeared on Vanityfair.com

9 best TV shows of 2022 picked by Vogue editors

The best Bollywood movies of 2022 were piloted by mega-angry women

10 shows and movies to watch if you want a good cry, streaming on Netflix, Disney+ Hotstar and Amazon Prime Video

See the original post:
Succession: The real people who inspired the HBO hit - VOGUE India