Mediaboss Marketing

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Almost all peasant cultures are brimming with rapists, pederasts and child abusers. Latin America just happens to be the peasant culture closest to the United States, while the Muslims are closest to Europe.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

According toNorth Carolinians for Immigration Reform and Enforcement, immigrants commit hundreds of sex crimes against children in North Carolina every month 350 in the month of April 2014, 299 in May, and more than 400 in August and September. More than 90 percent of the perpetrators are Hispanic.

They arent even counting legal immigrants. Arent those worse? Only certain Republicans get excited about the difference between legal and illegal immigrants. The rest of America is trying to understand the point of the last 40 years of legal immigration. Why was this necessary?

Below is a very short excerpt from a few days in November 2013. As Stalin is supposed to have said, sometimes quantity has a quality all its own.

Bundez, Jose, Juan (11/12/2013): Felony Sex Offense Parental Role

Aguilar-Sandoval, Jersson: Felony First Degree Sexual Offense; Felony First Degree Rape; Felony First Degree Kidnapping

Aguilar, Rafael (11/04/2013): Felony Indecent Liberties With Child

Aguilar, Rigoberto, Castellano (11/04/2013): Felony First Degree Rape; Felony Indecent Liberties With Child; Felony Stat Rape/Sex Offn Def>4-<6yr

(Note: Thats Sex With a Child Between 4 and 6 Years Old.)

Yxchajchal-Lacam, Jose, Daniel (11/12/2013): Felony Stat Rape/Sex Offn Def>4-<6yr

Manzano, Gustavo, Adolfo (11/20/2013): Felony Indecent Liberties With Child; Felony Rape of a Child

Monje, Alcides, Aguilar (11/18/2013): Felony Stat Rape/Sex Offn Def >=6yr; Felony Indecent Liberties With Child 13.

The list, for a single month in a single state, goes on in the same vein through 87 separate offenders. When not providing North Carolina meatpackers with cheap labor, immigrant workers seem to spend all their time raping little girls.

To be fair, there are also Asian names, such as YHon Nie (Indecent Liberties With Child, First Degree Sex Offense-Child, Second Degree Sexual Offense); and David Vo Minh (First Degree Sex Offense-Child, Indecent Liberties With Child).

North Carolinas cheap labor advocates better be paying Sen. Thom Tillis well. It sure isnt the average North Carolinian demanding that he shill for amnesty. Illegal immigration alone costs North Carolina taxpayers billions of dollars per year.

Our nations epitaph, with a photo of Sen. Tillis, could be: We built a powerful economic engine that attracted people, but then some businessmen saw their chance to screw the country and make a pile for themselves.Lets bring in low-wage workers so we can externalize our costs to the taxpayer!

Except North Carolinas businesses arent just externalizing their costs to the taxpayers. Theyre externalizing their costs to little girls.

The reason websites likeNorth Carolinians for Immigration Reform and Enforcementare so important is that the government and the media hide immigrant crime from the public.

They cite bogus studies that compare immigrants to Americas criminal class. (We didnt want immigrants who are only slightly less criminal than our worst inner cities.)

Or they announce their impressionistic conclusions. (I heard about a crime in Montana that state must have a lot of crime,is not a scientific way to argue.)

Or they refuse to count any criminal without an ICE detainer against him as an immigrant, at all. (Is the court translator a hint that the defendant isnt a 10th-generation American?)

The way to determine how many immigrants are committing crime is to count them. Why does the government refuse to do this?

The number of immigrants in prison would be a good start, but thats only the tip of the iceberg.

Immigrant criminals flee back to their own countries after arrest. Prosecutors deport illegals rather than imprison them and then the illegals come right back. Some George Soros-inspired prosecutors allow illegals to plea guilty to some minor offense, to prevent them from being deported.

To get the full picture, government investigators will need to talk to crime victims, police and prosecutors, too.

And we want honesty not studies that count anchor babies and second-generation immigrants as the native population.

The media is the governments co-conspirator in hiding immigrant crime. I have approximately 1,000 examples of media subterfuges on immigrant crime inAdios, America! The Lefts Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole.

Here are a few recent examples from Sen. Tillis North Carolina.

Headline: Burke County man convicted of raping 13-year-old girl, Charlotte Observer, Feb. 1, 2017 (Ricardo Solis Garcia an illegal whom Mexico refused to take back);

Headline: Burlington man charged with child rape, The Times News, Jan. 19, 2017 (Felipe Samuel Rivera Rodriguez);

Headline: Angier man accused of having sex with 14-year-old girl, The Fayetteville Observer, Aug. 29, 2016 (Estevan Roberto Silva).

NOTE TO READERS: The North Carolina Estevan Roberto Silva sex with a 14-year-old girl should not be confused with the Texas Esteban Villa Silva sex with a 12-year-old girl about 60 times or the Alabama Esteban Silva Jr. 42-year-old man convicted of sex with a 12-year-old girl. All these child rapes were revealed in coded headlines like Man pleads to sexual relationship with girl.

Other informative North Carolina headlines:

Headline: Man, 42, arrested for sexual offense with girl under 13 (Carlos Gumercindo Crus);

Headline: Man charged with sexual assault of a minor (Jose Freddy Ambrosio-Gorgonio);

Headline: Man Pleads Guilty in Child Rape Case (Luis Perez-Valencia).

Its too relentless to be a coincidence.

There have been more stories in the American media about a rape by white lacrosse players that didnt happen than about thousands of child rapes in North Carolina that did.

Im pretty sure our media is opposed to rape. But evidently, not as opposed as they are to America.

Continued here:
Ann Coulter: 'Immigrant Privilege' Drives Child Rape Epidemic - Breitbart News

Getty Image

Ann Coulter, who enjoys trolling almost everyone, may have reached her limit, or perhaps the Obamacare replacement rollout is more chaotic than the GOP could have ever imagined. On Monday evening, the party introduced their bill, which swiftly revealed itself to be a series of tax credits that seemed destined to increase premiums, although the replacement (as is) likely wont survive all of the Congressional hoop jumping required to become law.

One person who doesnt worry about being called out is Coulter. She proudly celebrated Donald Trumps immigration policies and rang in his victory with a series of white supremacist tweets. So, it does come as a surprise to see that Coulter really isnt a fan of how the repeal directly took on abortion, which she believes could be a death knell to acceptance of the bill.

Coulter pointed out more flaws and then decided that Obamacare should stick around for members of Congress (who didnt use it in the first place).

Go here to see the original:
Ann Coulter's Obamacare Replacement Rant Shows That Even She's Not A Fan Of The Trumpcare Bill - UPROXX

The first sentence of Congress Obamacare repeal should read: There shall be a free market in health insurance.

Right there, Ive solved the health insurance crisis for 90 percent of Americans. Unfortunately, no one can imagine what a free market in health care looks like because we havent had one for nearly a century.

On NBCs Meet the Press this weekend, for example, Chuck Todd told Sen. Tom Cotton that his proposal to create affordable health care that would be widely available, sounds good, but do you understand why some people think thats an impossible promise to keep?

(The do you understand ? formulation is a condescension reserved only for conservatives, whose disagreement with liberals is taken as a sign of stupidity.)

Todd continued: To make it affordable, making it wider, I mean, that just seems like you know, it seems like youre selling something that cant be done realistically.

Dream Sequence: Chuck Todd on Russias Meet the Press after the fall of the Soviet Union: Do you understand why some people think thats an impossible promise to keep? To make bread affordable, making it wider, I mean, that just seems like you know, it seems like youre selling something that cant be done realistically.

It turns out that, outside of a communist dictatorship, all sorts of products are affordable and widely available! We dont need Congress to provide us with health care any more than we need them to provide us with bread. What we need is for health insurance to be available on the free market.

With lots of companies competing for your business, basic health insurance would cost about $50 a month. We know the cost because Christian groups got a waiver from Obamacare, and thats how much their insurance costs right now. (Under the law, it cant be called insurance, but thats what it is.)

Even young, healthy people would buy insurance at that price, expanding the risk-sharing pools and probably bringing the cost down to $20 or $30 a month.

In a free market, there would be an endless variety of consumer-driven plans, from catastrophic care for the risk-oblivious to extravagant plans for the risk-averse.

You know just like every other product in America.

You should visit America sometime, Chuck! The orange juice aisle in a Texas grocery store knocked the socks off Russian president Boris Yeltsin. (Imagine how cheap a double screwdriver must be in America!)

Just as there are rows of different types of orange juice in the grocery store and loads of grocery stores there will be loads of health insurance plans and insurance companies offering them.

Americans would finally be able to buy whatever insurance plans they liked, as easily as they currently buy flat-screen TVs, cellphones and whats that product with the cute gecko in its commercials? I remember now! car insurance.

Evidently, insurance is not impervious to the iron law of economics that every product sold on the free market gets better and cheaper over time.

The only complicated part of fixing health care is figuring out how to take care of the other 10 percent of Americans the poor, the irresponsible and the unlucky. And the only reason that is complicated is because of fraud.

Needless to say, the modern nanny state already guarantees that no one will die on the street in America. The taxpayer spends more than a trillion dollars every year on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security disability insurance so that everyones health is taken care of, from cradle to grave.

Unfortunately, probably at least half of that sum is fraud.

Policing fraud is difficult because: (1) the bureaucrats dispensing government benefits believe there is no fraud and, if there is, its a good thing because it redistributes income; and (2) we keep bringing in immigrants for whom fraud is a way of life.

Consequently, after the first sentence establishing a free market in health insurance, the entire rest of the bill should be nothing but fraud prevention measures to ensure that only the truly deserving and the truly American are accessing taxpayer-supported health care programs.

Id recommend sending as much as possible back to the states, and also paying bounties to anyone who exposes a fraud against Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security. Anyone caught committing health care fraud should get 10 years. Not in prison, in a Medicaid doctors waiting room.

But Im sure you guys in Congress have come up with lots of great ideas for policing fraud in the seven years youve had to think about it.

Then, Congress can start removing all the bad stuff from the U.S. Code, such as:

n Tthe requirement that hospitals provide free care to anyone who shows up (how about separate health clinics for poor people with the sniffles?);

n The exemption of insurance companies from the antitrust laws (where all our problems began); and

n The tax breaks only for employer-provided health insurance (viciously and arbitrarily punishing the self-employed).

The goal of universal health care is very simple to achieve, just as the goal of universal wearing of clothing seems to have been taken care of.

The government can provide for those who cant provide for themselves, but the rest of us need to be allowed to buy health insurance on the free market an innovation that has made America the richest, most consumer-friendly country in the world.

Its taken 50 years, but, thanks to Hillarys losing the election, we finally have liberals on the record opposing the Soviet Union. Cant all of Washington come together and end our soviet health care system?

Go here to see the original:
ANN COULTER: How to provide universal health care with one weird trick - St. Augustine Record

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Right there, Ive solved the health insurance crisis for 90 percent of Americans. Unfortunately, no one can imagine what a free market in health care looks like because we havent had one for nearly a century.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

On NBCs Meet the Press this weekend, for example, Chuck Todd told Sen. Tom Cotton that his proposal to create affordable health care that would be widely available, sounds good, but do you understand why some people think thats an impossible promise to keep?

(The do you understand ? formulation is a condescension reserved only for conservatives, whose disagreement with liberals is taken as a sign of stupidity.)

Todd continued: To make it affordable, making it wider, I mean, that just seems like you know, it seems like youre selling something that cant be done realistically.

Dream Sequence: Chuck Todd on Russias Meet the Press after the fall of the Soviet Union: Do you understand why some people think thats an impossible promise to keep? To make bread affordable, making it wider, I mean, that just seems like you know, it seems like youre selling something that cant be done realistically.

It turns out that, outside of a communist dictatorship, all sorts of products are affordable AND widely available! We dont need Congress to provide us with health care any more than we need them to provide us with bread. What we need is for health insurance to be available on the free market.

With lots of companies competing for your business, basic health insurance would cost about $50 a month. We know the cost because Christian groups got a waiver from Obamacare, and thats how much their insurance costs right now. (Under the law, it cant be called insurance, but thats what it is.)

Even young, healthy people would buy insurance at that price, expanding the risk-sharing pools and probably bringing the cost down to $20 or $30 a month.

In a free market, there would be an endless variety of consumer-driven plans, from catastrophic care for the risk-oblivious to extravagant plans for the risk-averse.

You know just like every other product in America.

You should visit America sometime, Chuck! The orange juice aisle in a Texas grocery store knocked the socks off Russian president Boris Yeltsin. (Imagine how cheap a double screwdriver must be in America!)

Just as there are rows of different types of orange juice in the grocery store - and loads of grocery stores there will be loads of health insurance plans and insurance companies offering them.

Americans would finally be able to buy whatever insurance plans they liked, as easily as they currently buy flat-screen TVs, cellphones and whats that product with the cute gecko in its commercials? I remember now! CAR INSURANCE!

Evidently, insurance is not impervious to the iron law of economics that every product sold on the free market gets better and cheaper over time.

The only complicated part of fixing health care is figuring out how to take care of the other 10 percent of Americans the poor, the irresponsible and the unlucky. And the only reason that is complicated is because of fraud.

Needless to say, the modern nanny state already guarantees that no one will die on the street in America. The taxpayer spends more than a trillion dollars every year on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security disability insurance so that everyones health is taken care of, from cradle to grave.

Unfortunately, probably at least half of that sum is fraud.

Policing fraud is difficult because: (1) the bureaucrats dispensing government benefits believe there is no fraud and, if there is, its a good thing because it redistributes income; and (2) we keep bringing in immigrants for whom fraud is a way of life. (See Adios, America! The Lefts Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole.)

Consequently, after the first sentence establishing a free market in health insurance, the entire rest of the bill should be nothing but fraud prevention measures to ensure that only the truly deserving and the truly American are accessing taxpayer-supported health care programs.

Id recommend sending as much as possible back to the states, and also paying bounties to anyone who exposes a fraud against Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security. Anyone caught committing health care fraud should get 10 years. Not in prison, in a Medicaid doctors waiting room.

But Im sure you guys in Congress have come up with lots of great ideas for policing fraud in the SEVEN YEARS youve had to think about it. (Hello? Is he breathing? Dammit, Im not getting a pulse!!)

Then, Congress can start removing all the bad stuff from the U.S. Code, such as:

the requirement that hospitals provide free care to anyone who shows up (how about separate health clinics for poor people with the sniffles?);

the exemption of insurance companies from the antitrust laws (where all our problems began); and

the tax breaks only for employer-provided health insurance (viciously and arbitrarily punishing the self-employed).

The goal of universal health care is very simple to achieve, just as the goal of universal wearing of clothing seems to have been taken care of.

The government can provide for those who cant provide for themselves, but the rest of us need to be allowed to buy health insurance on the free market an innovation that has made America the richest, most consumer-friendly country in the world.

Its taken 50 years, but, thanks to Hillarys losing the election, we finally have liberals on the record opposing the Soviet Union. Cant all of Washington come together and end our soviet health care system?

See the rest here:
Ann Coulter: How to Provide Universal Health Care Using This One Easy Trick - Breitbart News

If you follow Ann Coulter on Twitter, then you know that she was blown away by President Trump's address to a joint session of Congress.

Coulter called the address"beautiful,""flawless"and "the best speech I've ever witnessed from Washington."

On "Hannity" tonight, Coulter said people shouldn't be surprised by the speech, because Trump has been pushing the same "America first" agenda since he announced his candidacy nearly two years ago.

"It was the same message he's been giving all along, but in a proper State of the Union format," Coulter said. "And nobody else in that room - not Republicans or Democrats - could have given that speech."

She said that the address was such a "home run," in fact, that the mainstream media is trying to ignore it.

"This is what they did throughout the campaign," Coulter said. "He would give a blockbuster speech ... and their position is to just say, 'Trust us, America. You don't want to see it. It was dark, it was awful.'"

"There was nothing new here. It was a beautiful speech. He loves America. No one else could give this speech."

Watch more above, and see what Bill O'Reilly thought about Trump's address.

How Trump's Address Went Over at a CA Bar Near the Mexico Border

Oprah Winfrey Rethinking Idea of Presidential Run After Trump's Win

Judge Jeanine on Trump's Address: 'It Was Presidential, He Spoke to Everyone'

VP Pence on Trump Speech: 'It Was a Great Night for America'

Excerpt from:
Coulter Praises Trump's Address: 'No One Else Could Give This Speech' - Fox News Insider