Mediaboss Marketing

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Judge Robarts veto of Trumps travel ban notwithstanding, there is not the slightest question but that the president, in his sole discretion, can choose to admit or exclude any foreigners he likes, based on the interests of the United States.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

The Clinton administration used the executive branchs broad power over immigration to send a 6-year-old boy back to a communist dictatorship. The courts were completely powerless to stop him.

As explained by the federal appellate court that ruled on Elian Gonzalezs asylum application: It is the duty of the Congress and of the executive branch to exercise political will, and in no context is the executive branch entitled to more deference than in the context of foreign affairs, which includes immigration.

The court acknowledged that Elian might well be subjected to re-education, communist indoctrination and political manipulation. (Then again, so would enrolling him at Sidwell Friends.) It didnt matter! Sending little boys back to communist dictatorships was the policy of the Clinton administration.

The Obama administrations immigration policy was to ensure that millions of poverty-stricken foreigners would come here and help turn our country into a Mexican version of Pakistan.

When Arizona merely tried to enforce the federal immigration laws being ignored by the Obama administration, the entire media erupted in rage at this incursion into the majestic power of the president over immigration. They said it was like living in Nazi Germany!

The most reviled section of the act, melodramatically called the Papers Please law, was upheld by the Supreme Court. But the other parts, allowing state officials to enforce federal immigration laws, were ruled unconstitutional. A presidents policy choice to ignore immigration laws supersedes a states right to enforce them.

The court conceded that hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens were arrested in Arizona each year, that they were responsible for a disproportionate share of serious crime, and that illegals constituted nearly 6 percent of Arizonas population.

But Arizona was powerless to enforce laws on the books if those laws happened to be about immigration. The presidents authority over immigration is absolute and exclusive, as part of his authority over foreign policy.

To review:

When the presidents immigration policy is to promote international communism: The president wins.

When the presidents immigration policy is to transform America into a different country: The president wins.

But when the presidents immigration policy is to protect Americans: Some piss-ant judge announces that his authority exceeds that of the president.

This is exactly what I warned you about inAdios, America: The Lefts Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole.NothingTrump does will be met with such massive resistance as his immigration policies.

The left used to attack America by spying for Stalin, aiding our enemies, murdering cops and blowing up buildings. But, then liberals realized, its so much more effective to just do away with America altogether!

Teddy Kennedy gave them their chance with the 1965 immigration act. Since then, weve been taking in more than a million immigrants a year, 90 percent from comically primitive cultures. They like the welfare, but have very little interest in adopting the rest of our culture.

In many parts of the country, youre already not living in America. Just a few more years, and the transformation will be complete. There will be a North American landmass known as the United States, but it wont be our country.

The only thing that stands between America and oblivion is a total immigration moratorium. We are well past the point of quick fixes as Judge Robarts delusional ruling proves.

The judiciary, both political parties, the media, Hollywood, corporate America and approximately 1 million lobbying groups are all working frantically to bring the hardest cases to our shores. Left-wing traitors, who used to honeymoon in Cuba and fight with peasant revolutionaries in Peru, toil away, late into the night, to ensure that genocidal Rwandans can move to America and immediately start collecting food stamps, Medicaid and Social Security.

No matter how clearly laws are written, government bureaucrats connive to import people from countries that a majority of Americans would not want to visit, much less become. Federal judges issue lunatic rulings to ensure that there will never be a pause in the transformation of America.

Congress could write laws requiring immigrants to pay taxes, learn English, forgo welfare and have good moral character. It could write laws giving the president authority to exclude aliens in the public interest.

Except it already has. Those laws were swept away by INS officials, federal judges and Democratic administrations under ferocious pressure from America-hating, left-wing groups.

The country will not be safe until the following outfits are out of business:

The ACLUs Immigrants Rights Project; the National Immigration Forum; the National Immigration Law Center; the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild; the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights; the Office of Migration and Refugee Services; the American Immigration Law Foundation; the American Immigration Lawyers Association; the Border Information and Outreach Service; Atlas: DIY; the Catholic Legal Immigration Network; the Clearinghouse for Immigrant Education; the Farmworker Justice Fund; Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees; the Immigrant Legal Resource Center; the International Center for Migration, Ethnicity and Citizenship; the Lesbian and Gay Immigration Rights Task Force; the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service; the National Association for Bilingual Education; the National Clearinghouse on Agricultural Guest Worker Issues; the National Coalition for Dignity and Amnesty for Undocumented Immigrants; the National Coalition for Haitian Rights; the National Council of La Raza; and the National Farm Worker Ministry.

And thats only a small fraction of the anti-American immigration groups assiduously dragging the Third World to our shores while you were busy working.

Look at that list look at Judge Robarts ruling! and ask yourself: Is it possible that anything short of a total immigration moratorium can save this country? Only when there is no immigration to bellyache about will these nuts be forced to think of a new wayto destroy America.

View original post here:
Ann Coulter: A Maniac Is Running Our Foreign Policy! (It's Not Trump) - Breitbart News

Subscribe to XXL on

Eminems verse on Big Seans new track No Favors had the internet going nuts. One person who is not amused is political commentator Ann Coulter, who was name-checked on the track by Marshall, and not in a good way.

On the single, the Rap God sends some scathing shots Coulters way, spitting, And fuck Ann Coulter with a Klan poster/With a lamp post, door handle, shutter/A damn bolt cutter, a sandal, a can opener, a candle, rubber/Piano, a flannel, sucker, some hand soap, butter/A banjo and manhole cover/Hand over the mouth and nose smother/Trample ran over the tramp with the Land Rover/The band, the Lambo, Hummer and Road Runner/Go ham donut, or go Rambo, gotta make an example of her/Thats for Sandra Bland, ho, and Philando.

Em didnt stop there, even going in on President Trump. Im anti, cant no government handle a commando/Trumps a bitch/Ill make his whole brand go under, Eminem raps.

TMZ recently caught up with Coulter, who said the bigger issue with the Detroit rappers bars directed at her is they normalize violence toward women.

Eminem with his rap song has normalized violence against women, she said. He talks about f-ing women with an umbrella until the bleep comes out. This goes on for years. He denounces gays using ugly terms. His homophobia and misogyny is quite well known.

Check out what people had to say on Twitter about Ems verse below.

Read Twitter Reactions to Eminems Verse on Big Seans No Favors

Subscribe to XXL on

Read the original here:
Political Commentator Ann Coulter Thinks Eminem Normalizes Violence Against Women With No Favors Diss - XXLMAG.COM

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

I mean, there are a hundred thousand on the other side, she noted.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

She predicted President Trump would not get any pushback and probably not the credit he will deserve for bringing jobs back. When he calls these companies and harangues them and makes them build their plants in America, makes them invest in America, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, theyre not going to come out and denounce Trump. Theyll say, Oh, it was just a hundred thousand jobs. It was just three thousand jobs. Okay, if thats your best argument, no problem.

But when it comes to hot-button issues like immigration, Coulter predicted every single entity would strike out at Trump, and hell need stalwart political fighters to man the battlements.

The media and the Democrats most of all because, like I say, this is life or death for them, and idiot Republicans who seem to think that we owe Somalis, Guatemalans, and Mexicans for the legacy of slavery, its the damndest thing, she remarked, surveying the forces that will line up against Trump on immigration reform.

As an example of furious pushback, SiriusXM host Alex Marlow described MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, speaking as the voice of the centrist establishment, going on a tear against Marlows longtime friend Stephen Miller, who now serves as one of President Trumps advisers. He characterized the attack on Miller as dirty and dishonest.

I will give our opposition credit: they have figured out the most powerful nerve center, besides Trump himself, within the Trump White House, Coulter said. Yeah, it would be great for them to take out Trump. This is when we ought to be throwing a party for Stephen Miller and saying, Congratulations! They cant call you dumb; they realize youre a very important component.

Hes brilliant, she said of Miller. You know, what I would like to do is go back to when you and he were growing up in L.A., and I dont know, get ahold of the soil conditions or the water or something. The two of you oh, my gosh! So patriotic, so smart. You love your country.

I was describing Steve Miller to some reporter recently. I was on a plane at the time, so I was writing out adjectives, and at the end of the sentence, I said, Im not just listing adjectives; Im actually pausing and thinking about each one. But the main ones are brilliant and patriotic, she recalled.

The same with you, she told Marlow. And to have that in these young kids, out of all places, Los Angeles! And then a few years later well, I wont even say her name, otherwise, shell just start being attacked, the opposition will figure out the other person they need to take out of the Trump White House.

But oh, my gosh. Thank God not taking the Lords name in vain; I mean it literally that Stephen Miller is on our side, Coulter said.

Marlow proposed that Millers effectiveness at moving the anti-establishment, anti-globalist Trumpian agenda as the reason he has been taking so much fire, even when his critics cannotpinpoint anything he did wrong.

Yes, hes very, very bright, Coulter agreed. It always struck me, especially kids from Los Angeles, the very epitome of coastal elites, how seriously and genuinely Stephen Miller cared about working-class Americans. Hes such a perfect fit for Trump. It would just casually come up in conversation. It was driving him crazy that they were being screwed over.

She said she did not see the Joe Scarborough rant against Miller herself but had received many emails about it.

I didnt even know what it was about at first because they were just blistering, Tourettes-ing emails about how they were never going to watch Morning Joe again, she said. I dont really understand it, other than I gather the opposition has figured out, Danger, danger, high-IQ person who loves America!

I probably dont need to worry because every time I do worry about something on Donald Trumps behalf, it turns out I didnt need to worry; its Trump, Coulter said. But you know, there is the White House bubble. I was just thinking, I travel a lot, I know a lot of people, and a lot of people from different walks of life. Just this week, Ive talked to a Hollywood producer, and a union executive, and lots of cab drivers in New York City, Los Angeles, and so on, an actress, a Broadway actress and singer okay, I dont need to list them all. But its been amazing to me how popular the non-ban, the non-Muslim ban is, and how popular Donald Trump is, and in particular with Im not a liberal; I dont think immigrants opinions are more important than American opinions, but its interesting because its contrary to the media narrative. Lots of immigrants in this country [are]wild about Trump, wild about the Muslim ban.

I mean, out there in the middle of the country, he is more beloved than he was the day he was inaugurated. And, by the way, got a larger crowd than Obama. I dont know if youve written much about that, but I have the briefing book. It was a much bigger crowd, and we should probably spend the rest of the radio interview allowing me to prove that. But I kind of think he needs a rally in Washington or someplace. Go out to America, she advised.

Ann Coulter is the author of numerous best-selling books, most recentlyIn Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!

Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m.Eastern.

LISTEN:

More here:
Ann Coulter: Establishment Targets Stephen Miller, the 'Brilliant and ... - Breitbart News

Everything said about President Trumps Muslim ban is a lie including that its a Muslim ban.

The New York Times wore out its thesaurus denouncing the order: cruelty injury suffering bigoted, cowardly, self-defeating breathtaking inflammatory callousness and indifference and thats from a single editorial!

Amid the hysteria over this prudent pause in refugee admissions from seven countries whose principal export is dynamite vests, it has been indignantly claimed that its illegal for our immigration policies to discriminate on the basis of religion.

This is often said by journalists who are only in America because of immigration policies that discriminated on the basis of religion.

For much of the last half-century, Soviet Jews were given nearly automatic entry to the U.S. as refugees. Entering as a refugee confers all sorts of benefits unavailable to other immigrants, including loads of welfare programs, health insurance, job placement services, English language classes and the opportunity to apply for U.S. citizenship after only five years.

Most important, though, Soviet Jews were not required to satisfy the United Nations definition of a refugee, to wit: someone fleeing persecution based on race, religion or national origin. They just had to prove they were Jewish.

This may have been good policy, but lets not pretend the Jewish exception was not based on religion.

If a temporary pause on refugee admissions from seven majority-Muslim countries constitutes targeting Muslims, then our immigration policy targeted Christians for discrimination for about 30 years.

Never heard a peep from the ACLU about religious discrimination back then!

According to the considered opinion of the Cato Institutes David J. Bier, writing in The New York Times, Trumps executive order is illegal because the 1965 immigration act banned all discrimination against immigrants on the basis of national origin.

In 1966, one year after the 1965 immigration act, immigrants from Cuba suddenly got special immigration privileges. In 1986, immigrants from Ireland did. People from Vietnam and Indochina got special immigration rights for 20 years after the end of the Vietnam War.

The 1965 law, quite obviously, did not prohibit discrimination based on national origin.(I was wondering why the Times would sully its pages with the legal opinion of a Grove City College B.A., like Bier! Any expert in a storm, I guess.)

In fact, ethnic discrimination is practically the hallmark of Americas immigration policy in addition to our perverse obsession with admitting the entire Third World.

Commenting on these ethnic boondoggles back in 1996, Sen. Orrin Hatch said: We have made a mockery of refugee law, because of politics and pressure. We let in one ethnic group out of compassion, and then they form an ethnic power bloc to demand that all their fellow countrymen be let in, too.

As the former Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, described diversity in Der Spiegel: In multiracial societies, you dont vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.

Thats our immigration policy plus a healthy dose of Emma Lazarus insane idea that all countries of the world should send their losers to us. (Thanks, Emma!)

Americans are weary of taking in these pricey Third World immigrants, who show their gratitude by periodically erupting in maniacal violence in, for example, San Bernardino, Orlando, New York City, Fort Hood, Boston, Chattanooga, Bowling Green and St. Cloud.

The Muslim immigrants currently being showcased by the left are not likely to change any minds. The Times could produce only 11 cases of temporarily blocked immigrants that the newspaper would even dare mention. (Imagine what the others are like!)

For purposes of argument, I will accept the Times glowing descriptions of these Muslim immigrants as brilliant scientists on the verge of curing cancer. (Two of the Times 11 cases actually involved cancer researchers.)

n Point one: If the Times thinks that brilliance is a desirable characteristic in an immigrant, why cant we demand that of all our immigrants?

To the contrary! Our immigration policy is more likely to turn away the brilliant scientist in order to make room for an Afghani goat herder, whose kid runs a coffee stand until deciding to bomb the New York City subway one day.(That was Najibullah Zazi, my featured Immigrant of the Week, on May 1, 2012.)

n Point two: I happened to notice that even the stellar Muslim immigrants dug up by the Times seem to bring a lot of elderly and sickly relatives with them. Guess who gets to support them?

House Speaker Paul Ryans driving obsession (besides being the Koch brothers lickspittle)is entitlement reform, i.e., cutting benefits or raising the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare.

I have another idea. How about we stop bringing in immigrants who immediately access government programs, who bring in elderly parents who immediately access government programs, or who run vast criminal enterprises, stealing millions of dollars from government programs?

n Point three: Contrary to emotional blather about the horrors refugees are fleeing, a lot are just coming to visit their kids or to get free health care. One of the Times baby seals an Iraqi with diabetes and a respiratory ailment was returning from performing his responsibilities as an elected official in Kirkuk.

Thats not exactly fleeing the Holocaust.

While its fantastic news that most Muslim refugees arent terrorists, the downside is: Theyre not refugees, theyre not brilliant, they dont have a constitutional right to come here and theyre very, very expensive. Until politicians can give us more government services for less money, they need to stop bringing in the poor of the world on our dime.

View original post here:
ANN COULTER: Give me your tired arguments - St. Augustine Record

If youve been wondering where Grammy- and Oscar-winning rapper Eminem disappeared to and, seriously, who hasnt? wonder no more.

The rapper, aka Slim Shady, aka Marshall Mathers, has resurfaced on a new record by Big Sean, a fellow Detroit native. Em appears back to his standard trick: rage-fueled name-dropping. His target this time around?

Who else? President Donald Trump.

He calls the president a b**** and drops some bombs about conservative firebrand Ann Coulter while hes at it, with lyrics that are so crude and foul were not going to repeat them here.

Em has kept a low profile in recent years, especially considering how prolific he was 15 years ago, when his film debut "8 Mile" earned his single "Lose Yourself" an Oscar for Best Song. He spent those years calling out pretty much everybody, from his mother (played in the film by actress Kim Basinger), to the mother of his daughter Haley, to Britney Spears and Limp Bizkit front man Fred Durst (remember him/them?). It's safe to say this shtick played a large part in catapulting him to the top of the charts.

Can lightning strike twice? Fact is, the artist would scoff at the notion. He'd say it's already struck countless times, and if anyone disagreed he really doesn't even care. Essentially rap's Axl Rose, Eminem can do whatever he wants at this point in his career, which suggests his rapping these particular lyrics about Coulter is something that just might have been thrust before him.

By Big Sean himself? His producer? Someone else?

Or perhaps this is just more discontentedness from liberal celebrities, coupled with their increasing penchant for calling for violence. Madonna talked about blowing up the White House, DeNiro talked about punching Trump in the face, Scott Baio has been attacked physically not once but twice and recent violence at UC Berkeley suggest the Left won't be satisfied until there is some very real unrest on the streets.

Related: Rioting, Violence on Parents' Dime at UC Berkeley

Despite the occasional celebrity calling for calm (Matthew McConaughey, for example, was quoted earlier this week saying that "we need to embrace President Trump"), there are 10 times that amount calling for civil unrest, and in the face of opposition, out-and-out violence.

Regarding UC Berkeley, protests erupted there on Wednesday ahead of a planned Wednesday appearance by right-wing commentator Milo Yiannopoulos, causing $100,000 worth of damage to the campus. The school released that figure on Thursday, and blamed "150 masked agitators" for it, saying they had "come to campus to disturb an otherwise peaceful protest."

Related: Michael Moore: Women Trump Voters Are Victims

Then two members of the Berkeley College Republicans "were attacked while conducting an interview" on the campus on Thursday.

So the question remains: Was Eminem called into action as a pop culture icon known for inflammatory lyrics spat out at a rapid-fire pace? Or did he merely see President Trump as an opportunity to become relevant again? How well the song charts might be the only answer to that question that we ever get.

More here:
Eminem Curses Trump, Raps About Sexual Assaults Against Ann Coulter - LifeZette