Archive for the ‘Ann Coulter’ Category

Chelsea Handler Burns Ann Coulter and Her Piece of Sh*t …

After Ann Coulter canceled her appearance on Chelsea Handlers Netflix show at the last minute, the host spent most of the episode tearing her to shreds.

The first sign that something was up came when Chelsea Handler posted an Instagram story Wednesday afternoon in which she literally set fire to Ann Coulters latest book, In Trump We Trust.

The conservative pundit, fresh off her crash-and-burn performance at Comedy Centrals Rob Lowe roast last month, was scheduled to be a guest on the episode of Handlers Netflix talk show Chelsea set to start streaming early Friday morning. But as the studio audience learned midway through Wednesdays taping, Coulter canceled her appearance at the last minute.

A disappointed Handler, who had been looking forward to squaring off with Coulter, made the most of the situation. Setting up a bit early in the show that compared headlines from The Drudge Report and The Huffington Post, the host joked, The problem is that most news sites are biased. They only filter through stories that you already agree with. Thats why I always get my news from wherever Ann Coulter doesnt.

Another joke that would have stung Coulter hard came at the end of that segment when one of Handlers writers presented a WorldStarHipHop video of a young boy climbing a refrigerator. I dont know what nationality that baby was, but if Trump builds that wall, hell be able to climb back over it, Handler remarked.

But it was during the part of the show in which Coulter was supposed to appear that Handler really turned up the heat. Most talk show hosts probably wouldnt have even mentioned the last-minute cancellation, but Handler decided to go in the opposite direction, calling in her friend and comedian Fortune Feimster to play Coulters body double, complete with long, blond wig.

Since I am always accused of not representing both sides in this election, I went out on a limb and booked one of the most vocal Trump supporters in the country, Handler said of Coulter before introducing her replacement. And you know what she did? She called in sick just before the show today. Oh sorry, she emailed in sick.

Do you know how seriously I take this job? Handler continued, no longer joking as she held Coulters book in the air. I was up at 5 a.m. this morning reading this piece of garbage.

Coulters replacement talked about how much she loves her book, how Comedy Central tricked her into participating in the roast, and admitted shes used to being called the c-word. When Handler asked her to share some of her political views with the audience, Feimster pulled out a dog-eared copy of the book and read what appeared to be passages from it aloud, but were really some of the more infamous Coulter quotes from over the years.

It would be a much better country if women did not vote, that is simply a fact, she read to groans from the audience, explaining, as Coulter did in an interview with The Guardian, that if only men had voted in every election since 1964 the Republican candidate would have won. Handler shot back, Which is exactly why women should be voting.

Asked if she, as a woman, wants the right to vote, Feimster deadpanned, Im a woman, but I dont love it. Its not my favorite.

Other quotes singled out from Coulters repertoire included the time she said gays are the molecular opposites of blacks because everybody likes gays moving in next door, and the one in which she declared that the government should be spying on all Arabs, engaging in torture as a televised spectator sport, adding Id watch.

Just as Hillary Clinton is using Donald Trumps words against him in the campaign ads he thinks are so mean, Handler let Coulters words speak for themselves. With each quote, the audience started to boo louder and louder, causing the comedian to say, You guys clearly didnt read my book.

In all fairness, in defense of my audience, its hard to get through that piece of shit, Handler said in response.

In an interview following the taping, Handler confirmed to The Daily Beast that she did read the entire book this morning before Coulter emailed to say she would be canceling her appearance. I was like, Oh my God, she said. But it was better to have Fortune anyway. It made it much more fun.

Thank You!

You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason

She had already been texting with Feimster, who had a memorable role in Handlers Netflix documentary series Chelsea Does, that morning, so it just occurred to her in the moment to have her stand in. She added that she really did want to talk to Coulter about why she supports Trump, but after she canceled she thought, Why not just throw her out to pasture?

Handler said Coulter was not the first Trump supporter she invited onto her show, but they tend to turn her down. All of the people who want to come on are Hillary supporters, she added. She figured Coulter would be good because shes not easily intimidated and doesnt seem to care about what people think.

If Coulter was worried about what might happen if she appeared on the show, she should have been far more fearful of what would go down if she didnt.

Stay tuned for a longer version of our interview with Chelsea Handler, including her latest thoughts on Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, later this week.

See the original post:
Chelsea Handler Burns Ann Coulter and Her Piece of Sh*t ...

Ann Coulter, doyenne of the deplorables – POLITICO

Ann Coulter delights in alienating a substantial swath of the American public Hispanics, Muslims, Jews (in one ill-advised tweet), leftists, fact-checkers, me (until I actually hung out with her) but she hasnt pissed off Donald Trump, and thats all that really matters right now.

The conservative grenade-chucker is in a unique position for someone who claims not to give a damn about influencing Great Events. I don't care about power. I don't care about credit, she told me last week for POLITICOs Off Message podcast. But Coulter has a healthy chunk of it in 2016, thanks to her self-appointed role as the guardian of Trumps soul on immigration, intent on keeping the GOP nominee to his old build-a-wall, kick-em-out credo.

Story Continued Below

I worship him like the North Koreans worship the Dear Leader yes, I would die for him, Coulter said, tongue in vague vicinity of cheek.

Half-joking aside, Coulter sees something of a kindred spirit in Trump. I didn't get the gene that makes me care about what other people think, she says. I'm much like Trump that way. I don't really care. They're just words.

But its his immigration rhetoric that really moves her, and vice versa. Last December, The Atlantics David Frum declared, "Perhaps no single writer has had such an immediate impact on a presidential election since Harriet Beecher Stowe, referring to the author of the 1852 book Uncle Toms Cabin, which inspired the Lincoln generation of abolitionists. It was hyperbole, but Frum had a point.

Last month, when a pivoting Trump suggested that there might be a softening of his career-defining immigration plan, the polemicist, author and cable news stalwart responded with a Twitter rebuke. And that, according to people in Trumps orbit, helped convince the candidate that he couldnt flip-flop without losing his base.

I think it was Kellyanne, who prodded him to attempt the move to the middle, Coulter told me last Friday referring to Trumps new campaign manager Kellyanne Conway, who has succeeded in sanding off some of the candidates rougher edges.

And thats Coulters biggest concern these days as her man mounts his underdog challenge against Hillary Clinton: All those incipient amnesty squishes surrounding Trump (Conway, Sean Hannity, Chris Christie, Rudy Giuliani, and even Jeff Sessions) will keep trying to pull him toward comprehensive immigration reform, which she views as the GOPs road to spiritual ruin, irrelevance and electoral doom.

Late last year, when Trump was tearing through the Republican field with his immigration message, Coulter kept up a lively correspondence with Conways predecessor, Corey Lewandowski, to offer criticism (she hated Trumps sneering comments about womens appearances, especially his slap at Ted Cruzs wife Heidi, which caused her to call him mental) and to make sure he wouldnt sell out.

I was worried, the first few weeks after he announced, and I haven't told the other people this I would email in a point or two now and then, and whatever. Whenever I would email Corey, whatever, Stop re-tweeting ugly photos of opponents' wives, or whatever it was, what the final point was [was] always, Don't let him back down on immigration, she said.

And Corey was getting a little exasperated with me and kept saying, He's not backing down, she added. Then he came out for the Muslim ban on my birthday, Dec. 8, my best birthday gift ever. I finally emailed Corey and said, OK, I think he's not backing down.

Its talk like this that has made the 54-year-old lawyer the Doyenne of the Deplorables, who believes and this reflects the feelings of many Trump supporters that unchecked Southern-border immigration poses an existential threat to the countrys essence. The emerging brown-hued majority, she thinks, would turn a basically munificent, majority-white, English-speaking America into a Tower of Babel peopled by mostly miscreant Muslims and Mexicans.

Different cultures have different predilections for different kinds of crime, she said, sitting in an Upper East Side hotel room with a panoramic view of Manhattan, a beehive of diversity and a bastion of liberalism. We are used to our own criminals. For example, our criminals tend to be stupid. They leave their DNA all over the crime scene. Now we're getting people where or cultures where criminality is a way of life. It's every even the smart people are criminals, and you have these massive Medicare frauds, massive Medicaid frauds.

Slow down. All of the Medicaid cheats I grew up with in Brooklyn were Russians, I tell her. And Bernie Madoff, who was born here, ripped off more cash than a million Mexicans. Oh, and I note out the window the black track of Second Avenue, uncoiling into the misty recesses of Lower Manhattan, to point out that in the old days native Protestant New Yorkers used to say the same nasty things about those grubby, throat-cutting Irishmen, Sicilians, Chinese and Jews.

The pushback delights Coulter, an ingratiating presence and attentive listener who nonetheless loves, loves, loves to get a rise out of her audience. Then she does this exuberant, pre-teen thing: a slight recoil of her bony shoulders every time she says something controversial, like a kid bracing for the firecracker to go pop and you are supposed to enjoy it even if it leaves your ears ringing.

I have huge fans. Gays love me, says Coulter who, of course, opposed same-sex marriage. One time, I was out with a friend, who is a total pussy, by the way, and he was worried being downtown with me. I was with a group of people, and we're walking along. And a black gay came running. He was running for like four blocks because he was my biggest fan, and my friend talks about that to this day A huge, enormous, sissy girl, she-male friend of mine he just stood there like dumbstruck and still talks about it to this day.

Coulter grew up in cossetted suburban Connecticut (her father was a Joe McCarthy-loving lawyer) but she tilted toward New York, and shes most comfortable around liberals. When I ask Coulter how she first became addicted to infuriating the left, she summons a tale from kindergarten in which she convinces her teacher to remove her black, anti-Vietnam armband by arguing, No one would ever trust America's word again if we don't defend the South Vietnamese here.

She honed her iconoclastic skills at Cornell University, where she poked at the administration for its affirmative action policies and she still loves the rush of campus protest, for or against her, but especially against her. To be un-hated is to be unnoticed. I was sad when I'd show up at some college campus and there would be, like, one lonely protester, she said of one uneventful book tour. I'd say to the organizer, What? Have they not read my recent stuff?

Coulter spends most of her time in California, but her silky blondeness belies her love of grimy old New York. I ask her if she takes a lot of grief walking around the East 80s after, for instance, calling Democratic convention speaker Khizr Khan, who lost a son in Afghanistan, an angry Muslim with a thick accent.

She waves it off. I must say mostly New Yorkers are lovely, Coulter said. Even if they disagree with me, they'll send me a glass of wine or something.

I dont know, and I couldnt quite tell after our hour together, if Coulter believes all of the stuff she says or just loves the theatrical, Archie Bunker rhetorical ruckus.

But why not take her at her word? Coulter wrote a book called Adios America (her new one is In Trump We Trust) and she embraces an old road to an ostensibly new American future a Henry Ford stewpot of ethnic assimilation though the restriction of immigration and the indoctrination of newcomers in American ideals. What others view as white nationalism, Coulter sees as apple-pie levelheadedness.

Take Compton, the L.A. neighborhood made famous by the all-black rap group NWA, which she says is now overrun by unwanted outsiders. Compton is all Hispanic now. And how did that happen? she says. Illegal aliens moving into neighborhoods they just move in and say, OK, we want the brothers out," and they will go and attack the houses, scream racist epithets, shoot, gang warfare.

But she can fluidly change tack, shifting from ethnic appeals to seemingly practical ones. I'm saying I'd love to deport our own criminals, but we can't, she laments. We're stuck with our own criminals. Why would we bring in other countries' criminals?

Only Trump who in Coulters telling speaks the language of economic, not racial or ethnic grievance can be a unifying force, she argues. I love Trump's policy of not appealing to groups, other than African Americans and that's a special case as groups, she says. He appeals to the entire working class.

This is not so much supported by the numbers, at least not yet. White working-class people are flocking to Trump, but blacks and Hispanics in the same economic stratum are opposing him in record numbers, and most of them think he is a racist and a xenophobe. A lot of people, at least Democrats, think the same thing about Coulter, as illustrated by a recent brutal Comedy Central roast where she was savaged for her ideology and personal appearance with equal vehemence.

She first met Trump years ago (she cant quite remember when) and wasnt especially impressed. We had had lunch once, and I probably thought of him until that magnificent Mexican rapist speech in the way a lot of the Never-Trumpers do, Coulter said. He seemed like a- I don't know, boorish vulgarian. I never really thought about him. I've never seen The Apprentice. I don't get up early enough to listen to Howard Stern. So, you know, I'd see the headlines. I knew that Marla Maples thought it was the best sex she had ever had.

But all that changed for Coulter when Trump made immigration the centerpiece of his campaign: And, you know, now, wow, was I wrong.

Which brings us back to the election. She is very confident Trump will win. And when he wins, she said, he will build the wall and crack down on undocumented immigrants, and damn all that talk of moderating his position. I'm getting to the point that I'm not sure I trust Jeff Sessions, she said of the deeply conservative Alabama Republican senator who has suggested, ever so gingerly, that Trump might have to modify his stance to garner greater popular support.

No, Coulter said, Trump doesnt need those weak people. Unlike many Republicans who have carped about President Barack Obamas monarchical abuse of executive power to press his immigration plan she believes President Donald Trump should raise a big, beautiful middle finger to Capitol Hill if they dont bankroll his ambitions.

Trump will build a wall, he's the commander in chief, she told me. I'm sorry. That is part of the defense of America. He has full authority to do that. He does not need a penny from Congress, but I think they're going to give it to him if he wins. ... Renegotiating trade deals, putting a big crimp in Muslim immigration, totally within the authority of the president, solely, exclusively. It's so clever. The things he talks about often are negotiations. They often are things that are 100 percent up to the Executive Branch.

What if he doesnt? What if he really is the scam artist Democrats say he is?

Then I am quite confident that I will spend much of the next eight years denouncing him, she says with a big smile.

Link:
Ann Coulter, doyenne of the deplorables - POLITICO

Ann Coulter Tries To Blame Comedy Central For Making Her …

By now, youve probably heard about Mondays nights Comedy Central Roast of Rob Lowe, which, intentionally or not, was actually a roast of political pundit Ann Coulter.

Not only did Coulter find herself on the receiving end of some of the nights harshest burns, it also appeared as though all of her jokes directed at Lowe totally bombed. According to her, however, she nailed it, and Comedy Central just edited the special to present a different picture.

Coulter, who said she wrote her own jokes with a little help from some friends, spoke to TMZ about the roast on Tuesday. When asked how she thought she did, Coulter replied, I dont know how they edited it, but I know I got laughs when I was there.

After TMZ executive producerCharles Latibeaudiere expressed his surprise at her statement, noting how bad it actually seemed on screen, Coulter added, They didnt seem to be wanting to do me any favors.

Can we just point out, though, that she agreed to be part of this roast, likely knowing how shed come across? Seriously.

The Huffington Post has reached out to Comedy Central for comment and will update this post accordingly.

See the rest here:
Ann Coulter Tries To Blame Comedy Central For Making Her ...

Ann Coulter – September 5, 2016 – Phyllis Stewart Schlafly …

She was valedictorian of her high school class and won a full scholarship to a Catholic womens college, but decided it was not challenging enough, so she worked her way through Washington University. With no scholarship money, Schlafly earned spare money as a model and also as a machine-gunner at a St. Louis ordnance plant -- at that time the worlds largest.

She earned straight As from Washington University and graduated a year early, Phi Beta Kappa and Pi Sigma Alpha (the National Political Science Honor Society). Her undergraduate political science professor wrote that her intellectual capacity is extraordinary and her analytical ability is distinctly remarkable . . . I have no hesitation whatsoever in saying that [Schlafly] is the most capable woman student we have had in this department in ten years.

Schlafly then attended Harvard graduate school on a scholarship, earning a Masters degree in political science in seven months. She received As in constitutional law, international law, and public administration, and an A- in modern political theory. (And this was long before Everyone-Gets-An-A grade inflation.)

Though Harvard Law School did not admit women, Schlaflys professors urged her to stay and attend law school. Alternatively, they proposed that she earn her doctorate. (Imagine the Harvard faculty meetings if she had stayed on and become a professor there!)

Her constitutional law professor at Harvard called her brilliant -- and consider that this was back when Harvard was a serious place, so it meant something. The professor who intervened on her behalf, Benjamin Wright, was a distinguished constitutional historian -- the sort of legitimate scholar who probably wouldn't have a chance of being hired by today's Harvard.

Schlafly said no thanks to Harvard Law and instead went to Washington, D.C. for a year, where she worked at the precursor institution to the American Enterprise Institute. It was the only time this monumental American political figure lived in the nations capitol.

After D.C, she returned to Missouri in 1949, married Republican lawyer Fred Schlafly, and raised six amazingly accomplished children in Alton, Illinois, where she lived until Fred's death in 1994.

In 1977, when being harangued by Dr. Joyce Brothers on the Merv Griffin Show, Schlafly mistakenly claimed Harvard Law School had been admitting women since at least 1945 and said she knew that because she almost went there. In fact, Harvard Law School did not begin admitting women for another several years. But in 1945, Harvard was prepared to make an exception for Phyllis Schlafly.

Years later, when Schlafly was testifying against the Equal Rights Amendment, the woman who almost became the first woman ever to graduate from Harvard Law School was ridiculed by potty little state legislators for not having a law degree. Senator Birch Bayh (D-IN), for example, called her one of those women with absolutely no legal training stand there brandishing law books, telling people what ERA 'really' means.

So in 1976, at age 51, while writing her syndicated column, raising six children, defeating the E.R.A. -- and in the middle of writing an 800-page book assailing Henry Kissinger -- Schlafly went to Washington University Law School in St. Louis. She graduated near the top of her class and won the award in Administrative Law.

Though Schlafly is most famously associated with her stunning, nearly miraculous, defeat of the E.R.A., she has played a pivotal role in a broad range of political controversies for more than half a century.

Schlafly managed her first congressional campaign in 1946, at age 22. The year after she married, she ran for Congress herself, losing to a popular Democratic incumbent. She ran and lost again against another popular Democratic incumbent in 1970. These may be the only quixotic battles she failed to win.

During 1970 congressional race, her opponent ceaselessly sneered that Schlafly should be home raising her children. Schlafly responded: My opponent says a womans place is in the home. But my husband replies, a womans place is in the House -- the U.S. House of Representatives. Today, feminists think they invented that line.

In 1964, she wrote A Choice, Not An Echo, which sold an astounding three million copies. (The average nonfiction book sells 5,000 copies; the average New York Times bestseller sells 30,000 copies.) This book would change the Republican Party forever. In this respect, it was not unlike many battles Schlafly would wage: First, she would conquer the Republican Party, then she could conquer the nation.

A Choice, Not An Echo, is widely credited with handing Barry Goldwater the Republican nomination for president. Goldwater lost badly in the general election -- but the Republican Party would never be the same. Goldwaters nomination began the retreat of sell-out, Northeastern Rockefeller Republicans -- who wanted to wreck the country with slightly less alacrity than the Democrats.

Without Schlafly, without that book and that candidacy, it is unlikely that Ronald Reagan would ever have been elected president.

Later in 1964, she collaborated with Admiral Chester Ward on another book, The Gravediggers. This book accused the elite foreign policy establishment of cheerfully selling out the nations military superiority to the Soviet Union. It sold an astounding 2 million copies.

Also with Ward, Schlafly co-authored the extremely influential (and extremely long, at over 800 pages) Kissinger on the Couch methodically assailing Kissingers foreign policy. As with her crusade against the E.R.A. -- being waged simultaneously -- Kissinger on the Couch would turn conventional wisdom upside down.

Until then, attacking Kissingers beloved Strategic Arms Limitations Treaty (SALT) was the secular version of challenging the Pope on infallibility -- or, I suppose, challenging a proposed constitutional amendment that purported to give women equal rights. But she was right, she was persuasive, and she overturned popular opinion.

Indeed, Schlafly has written prolifically about American foreign policy and military affairs, writing extensively about ICBMs and defense treaties. She was an early and vigorous proponent of a missile defense shield.

Meanwhile, feminists engaged in cliffhanger debates about whether it was appropriate for feminists to wear lipstick.

That Phyllis Schlafly is the mortal enemy of a movement that claims to promote women tells you all you need to know about the feminists. That many people alive today are unaware of Schlaflys achievements tells you all you need to know about the American media.

Almost no one remembers this now, but when Schlafly turned her attention to the E.R.A., no reasonable person would have supposed that the amendment could have been stopped. In 1971, the House passed it by 354 to 24. The next year, the Senate had passed it by a vote of 84 to 8. Thirty states had approved it in the first year after it was sent to the states for ratification. Only eight more states were needed, within the next seven years. There was little question that the E.R.A. was about to become our next constitutional amendment.

But the E.R.A. had not yet faced Phyllis Schlafly. Beginning in 1972 and over the next eight years, thanks to Schlafly and her magnificently patriotic organization, the Eagle Forum, only five more states ratified it. In the same time period, five states rescinded their earlier ratifications, for a net total of zero ratifications.

Not surprisingly given her background, one of Schlaflys most devastating arguments against the E.R.A. was that it would end the female exemption from the draft. Though the amendments proponents sneered that this was preposterous, she was right. Law professors would soon be making the exact same point in the likes of the Yale Law Journal.

She unflinchingly pressed points that polite people thought it bad taste to talk about. Academics prefer to approve the general sentiment and not think about any messy details or facts. Thus, for example, Schlafly questioned how ERA would affect gays, abortion, adoption, widows benefits, divorce law, and the military. She had an instinctive knack for pulling at the string that quickly unravels liberal nonsense.

Schlafly was composed, brilliant and relentless. Among her campaign initiatives against the ERA, Schlafly sent quiches to all the U.S. Senators who voted for the ERA with a friendly note saying, Real men don't draft women. A subscriber to the Phyllis Schlafly Report wrote to her in 1972: "We beat ERA in Oklahoma today and all we had was your report. I just went to the Capitol and passed it around and we beat it."

Schlaflys arguments trumped the political platforms of both parties, both Republican and Democratic presidents and their wives, and a slew of Hollywood celebrities including Carol Burnett, Marlo Thomas, Phil Donahue, Alan Alda, and Jean Stapleton. As Schlafly said, they have the movie star money and we have the voters.

Or, as George Gilder said, the only person on the other side was Phyllis Schlafly, but that was enough.

Reviewing a history of the sexual revolution in the New Yorker, John Updike wrote: If the court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, legalizing abortion, was . . . the crowning achievement of the sexual revolution, the defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment, which ran out of time in 1982, with only three more states needed for ratification, was the legal triumph of the counter-revolution, led in this instance by Phyllis Schlafly . . ."

It was almost unfair for Schlafly to train her analytical mind on the feminists. But what the feminists lacked in linear thinking, they made up for in their hegemonic control of the mainstream media.

No matter. Throughout her career, Schlafly refused to be intimidated by mediocre opinion makers decreeing what the bien pensant were supposed to think. She would take positions that almost no academic would defend, not because it was wrong, but simply because it was so contrary to acceptable opinion.

The most unfathomable aspect of Schlaflys success to todays political activists is that she mobilized a vast army of women -- and she did it without the Internet. Not without reason, she has been called the greatest pamphleteer since Thomas Paine. (But unlike Paine, she never went bad.)

The story behind Phyllis Schlaflys biography provides a good snapshot of Schlaflys power to inspire. The books author, Carol Felsenthal, had written a book review for the Chicago Tribune in 1977 ridiculing Schlaflys ninth book, The Power of the Positive Woman as irrational, contradictory, and simple-minded.

And then something extraordinary happened. Felsenthal says: Two days later, the letters of protest started coming, and they kept coming -- from people who were enraged that I had insulted Our Savior, as one letter writer called Schlafly, or Our Wonder Woman, as another called her.

Felsenthal noted that her newspaper, The Chicago Tribune did not even run a letters column for book reviews, so these werent for publication. Though Felsenthal had written hundreds of columns before this, she said she could count on one hand the number of letters they provoked. These women, she said, were writing for one reason only -- to convert me, to make me see the light.

Naturally, Felsenthal became fascinated with the woman who could arouse such passionate support. The end result was Felsenthals meticulously researched, definitive biography of Phyllis Schlafly, titled: Phyllis Schlafly: The Sweetheart of the Silent Majority. Charmingly, the toughest part of Felsenthals project was overcoming Schlaflys resistance to the very idea of a biography.

There is no major national debate in the past half-century in which Schlaflys powerful, salubrious influence is not manifest.

She staunchly opposed abortion, gambling and gay marriage and equally strongly supported Ronald Reagan and the strategic defense initiative. One of the rare times she disagreed with Reagan was over the idea of having another Constitutional Convention. She was right and she won. In 1996, Schlafly supported Pat Buchanan for president and in 2008 she supported Duncan Hunter, specifically opposing Mike Huckabee.

On March 11, 2016, Schlafly officially endorsed Donald Trump for president.

Schlafly wrote about complicated issues with insight and clarity. Time and again she would disembowel a 500-page legalistic monstrosity with a short syndicated column. Like an Olympic athlete, her talent was to make it seem easy.

She was as proficient as any law professor in the seriousness of her arguments. This is all the more impressive because she is writing for busy people -- housewives and politicians -- people who probably wouldn't mind a more purely rhetorical effort. But she never condescended to her audience. People who dismiss her as a mere rabble-rouser either havent read her work or have no idea what actual "scholarship" would be.

The sheer breadth of the issues Schlafly took on is astonishing. It is impossible to think of anyone alive today who addresses such a range of topics in any depth. Most public figures focus on one or two issues and stick with those. Not Schlafly -- and with no detriment to her analysis. (If anyone on the left did this with Schlaflys skill, there would be monuments, Time magazine Person of the Year awards, and hagiographic Hollywood movies.)

Schlafly commented on her boundless energy, saying, "It solves a lot of problems if you're busy."

For someone who spent so much time attacking liberal policies and received so much abuse in return -- Schlafly was remarkably free from ad hominem (or ad feminem) rhetoric. She was spat upon, burned in effigy and had a pie thrown in her face. Bomb threats were called in to her speeches. Feminist Betty Friedan once told her, "I'd like to burn you at the stake." Feminist Midge Costanza said Schlafly and Anita Bryant would make "a fine set of bookends" for Hitler's "Mein Kampf."

But Karen DeCrow, who debated Schlafly more than 50 times as president of the National Organization for Women from 1974-77, said she enjoyed those debates. "Phyllis is smart, so it was fun, DeCrow said. I never found Phyllis to be unpleasant, unfriendly or uncooperative." Felsenthal reports that during an interview, feminists surrounded Schlafly, spat at her and shoved middle fingers in her face. She says Schlafly "didn't pause, she didn't even blink."

Schlaflys retorts were more subtle, once noting during a debate on the ERA before jeering Brown University coeds that "another sexist difference between men and women, is that women hiss." But she never got personal or vicious -- as they did with her. She was a true lady.

Though conservative women in later generations are often compared to Schlafly, all of us combined could never match the titanic accomplishments of this remarkable woman. Schlafly is unquestionably one of the most important people of in the twentieth century and a good part of the twenty-first. Among her sex, she is rivaled only by Margaret Thatcher.

Schlafly once said that what shed most like to be remembered for is converting this nation to where it's as normal for parents to teach their kids to read before they get to school as it is to teach them to ride bikes." Based on her own successful home-schooling of her children, she has written wildly popular phonics instruction guides with tapes and a workbook.

The most fitting epitaph to Phyllis Schlafly is the last line of her profile at the Eagle Forum website, which concludes: The mother of six children, she was named 1992 Illinois Mother of the Year. You know she means it, and yet you also suspect she takes devilish pleasure knowing that the prominence given the award must drive feminists crazy.

Schlafly could have rested on her laurels after writing A Choice, Not an Echo. She could have rested on her laurels after defeating the E.R.A. Indeed, she could have rested on her laurels on any number of occasions over the past half century. America can be thankful that she did not.

Upon Ronald Reagans election in 1980, Senator Jesse Helms said, God has given America one more chance. With Schlafly and her long career, God gave America dozens of chances.

Schlafly is survived by her six children, sons John, Bruce, Roger, and Andrew, daughters Liza Foreshaw and Anne Cori, 16 grandchildren and three great grandchildren.

See the original post here:
Ann Coulter - September 5, 2016 - Phyllis Stewart Schlafly ...

Ann Coulter Tries To Blame Comedy Central For Making Her Look …

By now, youve probably heard about Mondays nights Comedy Central Roast of Rob Lowe, which, intentionally or not, was actually a roast of political pundit Ann Coulter.

Not only did Coulter find herself on the receiving end of some of the nights harshest burns, it also appeared as though all of her jokes directed at Lowe totally bombed. According to her, however, she nailed it, and Comedy Central just edited the special to present a different picture.

Coulter, who said she wrote her own jokes with a little help from some friends, spoke to TMZ about the roast on Tuesday. When asked how she thought she did, Coulter replied, I dont know how they edited it, but I know I got laughs when I was there.

After TMZ executive producerCharles Latibeaudiere expressed his surprise at her statement, noting how bad it actually seemed on screen, Coulter added, They didnt seem to be wanting to do me any favors.

Can we just point out, though, that she agreed to be part of this roast, likely knowing how shed come across? Seriously.

The Huffington Post has reached out to Comedy Central for comment and will update this post accordingly.

More here:
Ann Coulter Tries To Blame Comedy Central For Making Her Look ...