Archive for the ‘Black Lives Matter’ Category

Watching ‘Blade Runner’ in the Age of Black Lives Matter – Patheos (blog)

Blade Runner is my favorite movie of all time. And I am super-excited to see the sequel, Blade Runner 2049. But Ive come to realize that the movie takes on a different meaning in the age of Black Lives Matter.

Released in 1982 and directed by Ridley Scott, the dystopian sci-fi movie Blade Runner is set in 2019 Los Angeles where the rain never ceases and the sun is always shrouded by a thick curtain of smoggy clouds. The movie, loosely based on Philip K. Dicks novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, tells the story of a policeman named Deckard (Harrison Ford) from the Blade Runner unit. He is dispatched to retire (kill) five Replicants (androids) who have escaped from an Off-World colony and returned to Earth. They are the most sophisticated Replicants of a generation known as NEXUS-6. More human than human, is the motto of the Tyrell Corporation that creates them. The problem is that the NEXUS-6 Replicants have developed self-awareness and revolted against their human owners. Their return to Earth is driven by a desire to find a way to prolong their pre-programmed four-year lifespan.

Ive been watching this movie (both the original studio release and the directors cut) for the past 35 years. Ive saturated myself with the richly-synthetic soundtrack by Vangelis, and spent many days as a teen learning to play the music by ear. Ive read the script and watched the documentary about the movie. And I am eagerly anticipating the sequel, Blade Runner 2049, due out in October 2017.

But I saw something very different when I watched the movie a few days ago.

In anticipation of the release of the sequel, I sat down with friends to re-watch the original. It had been a few years since I last viewed the film. In that time, the Black Lives Matter movement, started in 2013 in response to police brutality and the murders of black citizens, has been working on my heart and mind. As a middle-class white woman who has benefited from privilege on so many levels, I know that the process of becoming woke is long and uncomfortable, but absolutely necessary.

My growing awareness of issues around bias, white supremacy, and racial violence has caused me to look at the world in a different way. As Roy Batty, the head Replicant, says to the man who genetically-designed his eyes, If only you could see what Ive seen with your eyes. Where I had previously thought of Blade Runner as a future-scape, what I see in the movie now is a metaphor for the ways in which blacks have been viewed and treated in this country for centuries and into the present time.

Granted, this may seem like a leap, since there are no people of African descent in the film, save for a few faces in the crowds. Except for Edward James Olmos (who plays a fellow detective in the Blade Runner unit), James Hong (a genetic engineer), and an assortment of minor ethnic characters, this is a film with white actors in the main roles.

And the NEXUS-6 Replicants are all white. Which is telling in and of itself. Did the Tyrell Corporation (or the films creators) deem it unsavory to create black Replicants? Would dark-skinned Replicants be too uncomfortable a reminder of the slave history of this country? Are Replicants of the caucasian flavor somehow more palatable?

These are not questions the film deals with. But they are questions I bring to the film. And now that I have begun to understand the ways in which people of color are targeted by violence and systemic racism, Blade Runner looks different to me than it did as a teenager in the 80s.

This is the one reference to race in the film. In Deckards overdubbed narration, he explains the kind of man he works for, and gives some insight into the ways in which humans regard Replicants. They were created to serve, to do the dirty and dangerous work. The women are pleasure models intended to provide sexual gratification. And both the male and female Replicants are designed to be violent killing machines for death-squads when necessary.

Replicants were engineered to copy humans in all ways save one no emotions. But in time, the Replicants do, in fact, develop feelings, and thus self-awareness. When they come to realize they are nothing more than slaves, they naturally rebel against their state of servitude. They turn on their owners, and do everything they can to escape and secure their freedom (including killing humans if necessary). Thus, they are deemed too dangerous for Earth itself. Replicants on Earth are illegal. And cops in the Blade Runner unit are sent out to kill any that return (ICE agents, anyone?).

This is exactly how the Europeans in the original slave trade, and the subsequent American slave owners, viewed Africans. They were and often still are viewed as subhuman, no better than animals, and devoid of emotions. When people of color get out of hand by being too emotional (angry) or demanding their freedom and equal rights, the police are sent out to use any means necessary to maintain law and order including the use of deadly force.

A major theme in Blade Runner is the way in which humans engineer and construct their conceptualizations of themselves and each other, and this has parallels in the study of race theory. The idea that one human being can own another is notion that has, in a sense, been engineered constructed in human consciousness since the beginning of civilization.

On top of that, the concept of a black person is also a construct. In Africa, the natives did not think of themselves as black. It was only when Europeans with lighter skin saw an opportunity to colonize and enslave entire tribes of people throughout the continent that the category of blackness came into being. Eventually blackness became a cipher for all the negative qualities of humanity aggressiveness, wildness, hyper-sexuality, superhuman physical abilities, and ferocious anger. These are exactly the qualities that humans in the Blade Runner world both exploit and simultaneously fear in the Replicants.

We could say that those who are categorized as black humans have historically functioned as Replicant-type automatons. They are expected to perform their duties of hard labor, domestic chores, and sexual servitude without question, without feelings, and with total obedience.

But of course, they are human. And they know in every cell of their bodies that their inhumane treatment is intolerable. As with the Replicants, African slaves rebelled against their owners, made desperate attempts to escape the brutality of their captivity, and did everything they could to secure their own freedom (even if it meant uprisings and killing their captors). Yet even after the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, and the Civil Rights Movement a century later, people of color continue to find themselves regarded as less than human by their white counterparts.

I recently attended a training session by VISIONS, Inc., an organization founded by three black women in 1984 to help organizations and individuals deal with issues of diversity in a more effective way. One of the participants, a black man, shared how it has felt for him to be treated as less than because of his race. I have felt inhuman, he shared. I feel that Im regarded as disposable, replaceable, that my existence doesnt really matter. I know that when I go certain places and encounter certain people, Im perceived as a threat, even though I intend no harm.

As a white person, this was necessary for me to hear. Because for hundreds of years, society has conditioned both white and black folk to think of blacks as dangerous, even murderous. Our interactions have been colored by mistrust, fear, and overreactions to perceived threats. This has become blatantly obvious in the stunning number of murders of blacks over the years, especially high-profile cases where police officers shoot unarmed blacks without provocation.

There is a particular scene in Blade Runner which brought this home for me. Deckard discovers one of the Replicants named Zhora working as an exotic dancer in a bar. Zhora makes a run for it, trying to lose Deckard in the crowded city streets. But he catches up with her and aims his gun right at her back. He fires and she falls through breaking plate glass, fake snow swirling around her bloodied body.

I could not help but recall the 2015 video of Walter Scott being shot in the back eight times by officer Michael Slager in Charleston, North Carolina. Slager recently pled guilty to violating Scotts civil rights a rarity in law enforcement where only 35% of cases of fatal on-duty shootings end up in convictions. In most cases, the scene is similar to the one in the movie where Deckard simply shows his badge to the other officer, and walks away scott free while a recorded voice from the police cruiser drones repeatedly: Move on. Move on. Move on.

There are no consequences for Deckard shooting an unarmed woman in the back. If he came before a court of law they would undoubtedly agree (as most juries do today) that he perceived a threat and justifiably opened fire. What he did was not considered murder in the eyes of the law, because, ultimately, Zhora was not considered to be a human being. So her life did not matter. But the truth is, she was human, and her life did matter. She had feelings, had friends who cared about her, and wanted nothing more than freedom and to live her life.

Life is precisely what has been stolen from the NEXUS-6 Replicants. They are given no longer than four years, and then a genetically-programmed switch shuts them down and they die. Its the failsafe to keep them under control, to prevent them from taking over.

Again, the metaphor for the black community is eerily resonant. Blacks statistically have a shorter lifespan (75 years) than their white counterparts (79 years). [For a great article cataloging the health issues related to black deaths, click here].

There are also many institutional structures that have been put in place to keep blacks under control and prevent them from taking over. Redistricting, gerrymandering, and red-lining. Higher interest rates charged for loans. Stop-and-frisk laws and stand-your-ground laws. Zero-tolerance rules, and excessive sentencing for criminal convictions. All of these (and more), plus the rise of blatant white supremacist groups to intimidate (and eliminate) people of color are just some of the ways in which modern racism manifests itself.

The constant reminder of being imprisoned by others racial attitudes was a point recently reiterated for me by Michael W. Waters, author of Stakes is High: Race, Faith, and Hope in America (Chalice Press). In a panel on preaching at the 2017 Wild Goose Festival, he reminded us how painful it is for a person of color to be trapped in their epidermis, knowing all the threats and risks that come with living in a body that has been constructed by race.

Interestingly, Blade Runner set the stage for other media to explore this question of what it means to be fully human versus subhuman and owned by those in power:

What Blade Runner and these other films and television programs urge us to consider is not just a future where we must confront the possibility of Artificial Intelligence and mind-altered primates gaining cognizance of self, but something much more immediate. They pose uncomfortable but important questions about the ways in which we regard dark-skinned humans as automatons or animals, and the ways in which such attitudes result in turning us into the evil we have projected onto black people.

In the final scene of the battle between Roy and Deckard, it was not lost on me the significance of Roy saving Deckard from death. As the Blade Runner dangles from a girder at the top of a building, his fingers slip and he falls. But Roy grabs him and pulls him back up onto the roof with one hand. It is a hand stuck through with a nail he had used to keep his failing body alive the only way he knew how with pain.

In that moment, Roy becomes a Christ-like figure, his hand reminiscent of Jesuss own hand nailed to the cross. The crucifixion was a saving act. And Roys stunning last act saving Deckard when he did not at all deserve saving was a powerful scene of grace (complete with Roys white dove, a symbol of the Holy Spirit).

As I learned in my VISIONS training, when it comes to racial reconciliation, wounded hands continue to reach out and grab us with a grace that will not let us go.

Despite the Black Lives Matter hermeneutic Ive used to analyze Blade Runner, I must admit that the subtle metaphor for race relations Im seeing in the film does not rescue it from its inherent whiteness. And as I watched the trailer for the sequel, Blade Runner 2049, Im preparing myself for the same diversity let-down. Granted, the new movie obviously takes up again the questions of what it means to be human, and what it means to subjugate an entire people to slavery (Every civilization was built on the back of a disposable work force, says one of the characters, as we see a scene of manufactured bodies of various skin tones). But if the 3-minute sneak preview of the film is any indication, whiteness is still the dominate ethos of the film, and thus the director and producers. Because there appear to be no actors of color in any of the main roles.

This would be a shame. Because as stunning and visionary as the films are, their white-washing of racial diversity is a real blind spot.

The future Im hoping for is the normalization and celebration of brownness and blackness to the point where both the pain and joy of the racial experience are woven into the fabric of our personal, interpersonal and societal relationships. But with more than 400 years of slavery and white supremacy in our past, and the continued resistance of our culture to do the work of racial reconciliation, it looks like the future Im hoping for is even further away than 2049.

For another perspective on Blade Runner, check out: Do You Like Our Owl? Blade Runner and Climate Change

Leah D. Schade is the Assistant Professor of Preaching and Worship atLexington Theological Seminary(Kentucky) and author of the bookCreation-Crisis Preaching: Ecology, Theology, and the Pulpit(Chalice Press, 2015).

You can follow Leah on Twitter at@LeahSchade, and on Facebook athttps://www.facebook.com/LeahDSchade/.

The rest is here:
Watching 'Blade Runner' in the Age of Black Lives Matter - Patheos (blog)

FOP president’s Facebook post addressing Black Lives Matter … – WCPO

CINCINNATI -- The leader of a group supporting black police officers blasted Cincinnati's police union president for a recent Facebook post addressed to "Black Lives Matter Protestors (sic)."

Officer Eddie Hawkins, president of the Sentinel Police Association, called Sgt. Dan Hils' recent Facebook post inappropriate and absurd.

Hawkins released a statement regarding the post, which Hils posted Saturday, when several groups marched from Fountain Square to The Banks demanding "justice for Sam DuBose." Ray Tensing, a former University of Cincinnati police officer, shot DuBose in the head during a traffic stop in July 2015. DuBose was black; Tensing is white.

A judge dismissed charges against Tensing Monday after jurors could not reach a unanimous verdict in two trials. DuBose didn't have a gun. Tensing claimed DuBose tried to speed away from the stop, causing him to fear for his life.

In the post, Hils said he wanted to help their objective at the rally today protesting black lives lost. He then listed the names of 32 black homicide victims, saying ...I wanted to let you know first how many of those black lives lost were in police interventions. Ok, get ready for ithold on and take a deep breathare you sure that you are ready?.................Ok, thats right it is zero (0), not a one, zilch.

Some commented on Hils' post, thanking him for bringing the information into the public sphere. Others were critical, saying Hils undermined police brutality by listing the victims of "black on black crime."

Hawkins said he was disturbed by recent events surrounding Hils, including the Facebook post and his recent withdrawal from the process of updating Cincinnati's landmark Collaborative Agreement on police-community relations.

I reject Dan Hils' inappropriate post referring to black on black crime, which amounted to telling the black community that they cannot be upset about police involved shootings until every single homicide involving a black victim is resolved, Hawkins said in a statement.

He said black police officers are often caught in the middle of being blue and being black.

The fact is we are divided; not by race, but by right versus wrong, and what appears to be right for some is not necessarily right for others. Hils' comments ignores the plight and feelings of the black officers who he is supposed to serve, Hawkins said.

Hils declined to comment over the phone, but he said he would issue a written statement Thursday.

Link:
FOP president's Facebook post addressing Black Lives Matter ... - WCPO

Court will erase trespassing charges against Black Lives Matter protesters – Press Herald

Charges against 17 Black Lives Matter protesters arising from a Commerical Street protest last summer have been erased.

In January, the protesters, who blocked a section of Commercial Street on a busy summer night and were arrested after refusing to disperse, agreed to plead guilty to violating a city ordinance on disorderly conduct. The deal called for the 17 to pay $200 each toward a victims compensation fund and to attend a restorative justice meeting with Portland police officials to discuss the protest. The protesters paid the fine, but the meeting with police fell apart after the protesters refused to be split into two groups to talk to Portland Police Chief Michael Sauschuck and were told that a representative of the District Attorneys Office would also attend the session.

The January deal called for the charges to be dismissed after six months, as long as the protesters abided by the terms of the deal and did not commit any criminal offenses in the interim. That deadline lapsed Wednesday and none of the protesters committed new offenses, said Jennifer Ackerman, an assistant district attorney in Cumberland County, so the court will automatically wipe out the charges.

In essence, the protesters and the DAs office agreed to disagree over whether the group had complied with the terms of the deal on the meeting with police, Ackerman said. However, the DAs office already lost an effort to have a judge determine that the protesters had breached the agreement. The judge refused to do so in May and turned aside the DAs office request to have the original criminal charges restored.

Although the judge called for both sides to try again on the meeting, it never took place. After the judges ruling, DA Stephanie Anderson said she would not seek to reschedule the meeting and that he protesters would have to come to her to reset the session, which they did not do.

To put the onus on my clients is entirely unfair, lawyer Tom Hallett, who represented the protesters at the hearing in May, said Wednesday. This was a clear victory for the Black Lives Matter side.

Original post:
Court will erase trespassing charges against Black Lives Matter protesters - Press Herald

Charges against Portland Black Lives Matter protesters dropped – Bangor Daily News

PORTLAND, Maine A year after Portland police ended a Black Lives Matter demonstration with a mass arrest, the resulting legal drama has come to a close with the criminal charges against 17 protesters being dismissed.

The charges were expected to be dropped since May, when a court hearing failed to repair a botched settlement agreement between the demonstrators and the Cumberland County District Attorney.

The deal, which would have also seen the misdemeanor charges dropped, hinged on police and protesters talking through their differences in a so-called restorative justice session.

It would have been the first time such a program was used in a civil disobedience case in Maine. But the deal went to pieces in the hall of a Portland church in February, when the protesters and an assistant district attorney couldnt agree over logistics for the session.

In May, a judge blocked the district attorneys move to again prosecute the charges and ordered protesters and police to try again at the restorative justice session.

After the ruling, District Attorney Stephanie Anderson said her office would not make another attempt at the session, thereby leaving the charges in an inactive court docket where they were finally dismissed Wednesday.

See the original post here:
Charges against Portland Black Lives Matter protesters dropped - Bangor Daily News

‘Stupid or Liar’: What Justine Damond’s Death Proves About All Lives Matter – The Root

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Weve played this game before. It derived from a bit by podcaster Adam Carolla, who takes inane statements from politicians, celebrities and people in the news and asks: Are they stupid or are they lying?

Todays episode of Stupid or Liar focuses on the death of Justine Ruszczyk (Her name was not Damond. It was going to be Damond after she was married. If America adhered to that as the journalistic standard, my high school yearbook would have referred to me as Sir Michael Harriot, husband of Janet Jackson).

Less than a week after Justine Ruszczyk was killed by a fatal gunshot wound to the abdomen from a Minneapolis police officers gun, the police chief has been forced out, the mayor is on thin ice, and the new chief is an African-American man with deep roots in Minneapolis.

Minneapolis Chief of Police Jane Harteau resigned Friday after careful reflection on the comments

As soon as I heard about this incident, I ran to my computer and waited. Ive seen the routine so many times, I knew exactly what would happen. Immediately following her death, some industrious news reporter would release her criminal historyeven if it had no bearing on the shootinglike media outlets did when they reported the killings of DeJuan Guillory and Walter Scott.

If she had a clean criminal record, theyd at least put out the most menacing, villainous photo of her, the way they did Trayvon Martin. Theyd go back as far as her high school teachers or her neighbors to find a personality defect that would adequately describe why the valiant hero cop feared for his life.

I sat patiently in front of the screen waiting for a Google alert from the mayor, police chief or police union explaining how there was no need to jump to any conclusions or take any actions until they conducted a thorough investigation. I knew it was coming. It always happened this way.

Im still waiting.

During my wait, an attorney called Ruszczyk the most innocent police shooting victim hes ever seen. Robert Bennettthe lawyer who made these commentsis either blatantly lying or he is the stupidest white man in the long, storied history of stupid white men.

Is there even a superlative for the word innocent? If sois Justine Ruszczyk more innocent than Rekia Boyd, who was simply talking on her cellphone when an off-duty cop fired a bullet into her skull? Was John Crawford IIIs innocence permanently erased in the .36 seconds it took for cops to burst into Walmart and eliminate his existence for the unmitigated gall of buying a BB gun? A lawyer like Bennett, who represents high-profile police-shooting victims, would know about these cases. If he doesnt, then, by definition, that makes him stupid.

stupid

st(y)oopd/

1. having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

Ruszczyks death happened fewer than 20 miles from the St. Paul, Minn., courthouse where Police Officer Jeronimo Yanez was acquitted of murder in the death of Philando Castile. Castile was in his car posing no threat to the officer who killed him. Yanez shot him on July 6, 2016. For context, on July 7, 2016, this article appeared:

It was a regular thing for Philando Castile to be stopped by Minnesota police for minor traffic

Im sure an article like this will be coming out about Justine Ruszczyk pretty soon. I know it has been over a week, but shes from Australia, which is another country on the other side of the world, which means reporters probably have to translate her criminal record from Australian to English, which could take a while. Im sure thats what the holdup is about.

While Im sitting here, I might as well wait for the All Lives Matter people to explain how we dont know the whole story. Blue Lives Matter will probably come out en masse, too, to defend the honor of the Somali cop who shot her. If they dont care about race, then the All Lives Matter advocates will implore us to wait until authorities do their due diligence. Thats probably whats going to happen, right?

Unless they were lying this whole time.

To be fair, maybe the All Lives Matter people are so blinded by the combination of privilege and reflexive defensiveness that comes free in every package of white supremacy that they have no idea that responding to Black lives matter with All lives matter is akin to telling a man dying of a heart attack about their bout with acid reflux. Perhaps they dont know that there is not a sane human being in the United States who wonders whether white lives matter. Maybe All Lives Matter is just stupid.

The man who killed Rekia Boyd was acquitted of involuntary manslaughter becauseaccording to a judgethe fact that he fired an unregistered weapon into a dark alley wasnt proof of recklessness. Two days after Ruszczyks death, federal authorities declined to press charges against the cops who shot John Crawford.

Its been almost three years since a Beavercreek, Ohio, police officer fatally shot a black Walmart

Anyone who insinuates that Crawford, Boyd, Castile, et al. were not as innocent as Ruszczyk are conflating innocence with whiteness. None of the others had committed a crime. All of them are dead.

The media immediately named her shooteras did the city of Minneapolisas a Muslim of Somali descent. Staunch conservatives and white allies alike all say this has nothing to do with race. Quicktell me Jeronimo Yanezs religion. Can you tell me from which country Officer Sean WilliamsJohn Crawfords killerdescended? Stupid liars, the whole lot of them.

None of this is Justine Ruszczyks fault. She is as blameless as the previously mentioned victimsbut not more so. It is disingenuous to have a discussion about this entire incident and sidestep the obvious fact that part of the uproar about her death stems from the fact that she was a classically attractive white woman. Anyone who does so is either being dishonest or willfully ignoranttwo euphemisms for ... you know.

In just six days, Justine Ruszczyks death uprooted the entire government of the 46th-largest city in America. Two countries are outraged. People of all colors, religions and ethnicities are protesting.

They all have a right to be upset, but we should be clear: If it had anything to do with the fact that Ruszczyk was a bride-to-be, Sean Bells killers would be in jail. If it had anything to do with the fact that she was the one who called 911, then the men who shot Brendan Hester would be locked up. If her immigrant status makes others empathetic toward this tragedy, where were these same outraged advocates for swift justice when the men who shot Amadou Diallo walked away scot-free?

Justine Ruszczyk is an innocent, pure victim because she is white, and we all know it. No one wants to admit it, so Ill just sit here and wait for them to treat her with the same disrespectful criminal taint that they do every victim of color. Maybe theyll find a stash of CDs she was trying to sell or uncover a stash of loose cigarettes. Maybe there were Skittles in her pocket. Im sure theyll dig up something. Ill wait.

Nah. Im lying.

Theres no way Im that stupid.

See more here:
'Stupid or Liar': What Justine Damond's Death Proves About All Lives Matter - The Root