Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Malik Siraj Akbar: Censorship Returns to Pakistan

HuffPost's QuickRead...

Loading...

HuffPost's QuickRead...

EDITION: U.S. CA Canada  Québec FR France US United States UK United Kingdom Japan Earthquake Japan Iranathon Venezuela Armchair Detective More Log in | Create Account | Sign Out February 28, 2012 Like

45k

  CONNECT     FRONT PAGE U.S. UK CANADA QUÉBEC FRANCE POLITICS 2012 BLOG HUFFPOST HILL 2012 ELECTIONS FUNDRACE GREEN POLLSTER SPECULATRON OFF THE BUS BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS ENTERTAINMENT CELEBRITY ENTERTAINMENT MUSIC RADIO MOVIES TV GAMES COMEDY TECH TECH TECHCRUNCH JOYSTIQ SCIENCE ENGADGET APPLE BLOG MEDIA LIFE & STYLE STYLE NEWS STYLELIST FOOD NEWS WEDDINGS PARENTS GREEN TRAVEL STYLELIST HOME KITCHEN DAILY DIVORCE HUFF/POST50 RELIGION CULTURE ARTS PARENTS TRAVEL COLLEGE RELIGION IMPACT BOOKS EDUCATION COMEDY HEALTHY LIVING HEALTH AND FITNESS HEALTH NEWS MINDFUL LIVING SLEEP WOMEN HEALTHY LIVING PARENTS LOCAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO DENVER MIAMI PATCH CHICAGO LOS ANGELES DC DETROIT YELLOW PAGES MORE GOOD NEWS SCIENCE BLACKVOICES SPORTS WORLD GAY VOICES GREEN LATINOVOICES COLLEGE CRIME WEIRD NEWS TEEN WORLD SYRIA TERRORISM FOREIGN AFFAIRS ARAB SPRING DRUG WAR FRENCH ELECTIONS IRANATHON WORLD VIDEOS

More:
Malik Siraj Akbar: Censorship Returns to Pakistan

Turkey noted with "satisfaction" Constitutional censorship of the law criminalizing Armenian Genocide denial (Embassy)

2012/02/28 (Last modification: 2012/02/28 à 18:09)

 

Turkey welcomed "with satisfaction" the censorship by the French Constitutional Council for a law criminalizing Armenian Genocide denial, causing a diplomatic crisis between Paris and Ankara, said Tuesday the Turkish Embassy in Paris.

 

    "This gives some hope regarding the future of relations (...) we note with satisfaction the decision, "said the spokesman of the Engin Solakoglu diplomatic representation, stating that the decision should
still be analyzed.

    The Constitutional Council censured Tuesday the law criminalizing denial of the Armenian genocide in 1915, saying it was contrary to freedom expression, the court announced.

    "The Council considered that penalizing denial of the existence and legal characterization of crimes would is qualified as another crime, the legislators turned to an unconstitutional infringement to the exercise of freedom of expression and communication ", according to a statement
Council.

View original post here:
Turkey noted with "satisfaction" Constitutional censorship of the law criminalizing Armenian Genocide denial (Embassy)

Schmidt: Don't let censorship hold back the Net's benefits

With the Internet, "the weak will be made strong"--unless dictators try to keep too much control over the Net, Google's executive chairman forecasts.

Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt speaking at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain

(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET)

BARCELONA, Spain--Technology is going to make it harder to be a repressive dictator, Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt believes, but censorship could still create a "digital caste system" that will mean some people remain laggards in the global economy.

Information inevitably will leak like water out of areas where censorship prevails, he said in a speech at the Mobile World Congress show here. And mesh networks--peer-to-peer connections linking mobile phones to each other without central Internet access points--will make that information leak even faster.

"In times of war and suffering, it will be impossible to ignore the [information] that comes out," Schmidt said. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's "brutality will be on display for everyone to see. In this world there will be far less room for dictators to hide [and it will be] far easier for people to mobilize. This is what we saw in the Arab Spring."

Schmidt isn't satisfied with information leaking out through back channels, though. "Forty countries engage in active censorship, up from four a decade ago. Google products are blocked in 25 of 125 countries in which we operate." Even in the United States there are "worrying" moves, he said, no doubt referring to the recently vanquished SOPA and PIPA legislation.

"They're going to fail," he said of censorship efforts, but added, "We need to act now to avoid the rise of this digital caste system."

Meanwhile, in the rest of the world, he predicted that technology will help improve people's lives, evening some differences between techno-savvy early-adopter elites, more mainstream middle-class people, and the 5 billion who today have yet to connect to the Internet.

"Technology is a leveler. The weak will be made strong, and those with nothing will have something," he said, sounding downright biblical in his pronouncement.

Schmidt spoke to a packed house and took questions for about half of his time on stage. Some executives might not be comfortable venturing off the script, but Schmidt fielded questions with relish.

His best laugh line of the evening came when an Iranian resident objected that Chrome wasn't available in the Android Market. Schmidt said it was because of U.S.-required legal sanctions, but it would certainly be available if he had his druthers.

"I'm with you," Schmidt said. "But prison--there's no bandwidth."

He also showed a talent for stand-up comedy when asked about Google Fiber, the effort to bring super-fast fiber-optic Internet access to the denizens of Kansas City, Mo., and Kansas City, Kan. Just what are the project's implications?

"People will want to move to Kansas City, Kansas," he quipped, getting a good laugh.

More seriously, he added, "At the speeds we're moving, the distinctions between television, radio, DVD, and high-definition just disappear. It's all just bits." That means the businesses of delivering that information will radically transform from today.

"So much of the infrastructure we grew up with is because of technical limitations which fiber simply eliminates," Schmidt said. "Ours should generate 300 to 500 megabits sustained," enough for "true holographic images."

And Google won't be the only one delivering such services. They exist already in Japan and South Korea and will spread. "A new intelligent infrastructure will emerge. By 2020, fiber networks will be deployed in nearly every city," Schmidt predicted.

Android, Google's mobile operating system, also will transform the world as ever-lower processor and storage prices mean lower-cost smartphones.

"Next year's $100 phone is this year's $400 phone," he said. "Many people are working on [smartphones] in the $100 to $150 range. When you get to the $70 point you get to a huge new market," especially because those phones are resold used for $20 or $30.

About 850,000 Android devices are activated every day, reaching a total of 300 million so far, and there are 450,000 apps in the Android Market, project leader chief Andy Rubin said here.

Schmidt is bullish on the growth. "Do the doubling every month, eventually it'll be a trillion," he said. "We need to produce more people."

Android has had plenty of problems--writing programs that work on the multitude of devices, branching out to tablets, upgrading older phones to newer OS versions, and fending off patent infringement suits, and variants that sidestep Google's ecosystem, for example.

Many problems will ease this year, though. "The year 2012 is [about] building out the full Android ecosystem," he said, including the difficult task of getting the next-generation Ice Cream Sandwich onto phones where it's largely absent today. He said Google will leave it up to market forces, not litigation, to draw Android strays into the Google fold.

"We hope the pressure from consumers" will mean the strays will see "the benefits of joining this larger Android ecosystem."

Read more from the original source:
Schmidt: Don't let censorship hold back the Net's benefits

censorship laws become an important issue in schools and universities

According to free speech experts, censorship has spread in schools and colleges throughout the United States in recent years.

In 2011, the Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled in favor of the University of Minnesota to reprimand the off-campus speech of student Amanda Tatro for comments made on Facebook.

The court indicated this ruling was not due to the nature of the comments but their effect on the university's curriculum. Therefore, it became possible for the university to control a student's off-campus speech when it affected the reputation of the school.

"To the extent a decision is made regarding curriculum, the school should be able to make it," Missouri Press Association consultant Jean Maneke said. "To the extent a publication exists as public forum, there needs to be tolerance for free speech."

Tatro's Facebook comments focused on taking out her aggression in a science-mortuary class on a cadaver she named Bernie. Another student found the posts offensive and turned them over to the university. Families that donated cadavers called in concerns to the university, and Tatro was briefly expelled from class while police investigated her Facebook threats to stab an ex-boyfriend with medical equipment.

Tatro was venting in an off-campus forum thought to be outside the university's reach. Due to a lack of precedent for this case, the courts looked to the 1988 Missouri case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier involving high school students.

Before Hazelwood, the Supreme Court gave primary education students the benefit of free speech as long as it was not disruptive to the school environment. Hazelwood increased the level of censorship to control any action that caused "legitimate concern related to individual rights, safety or distractions to the school environment."

The Hazelwood decision allowed school officials to censor clothing, speech and even hair color. The 6th Circuit Court also recently applied the Hazelwood decision to permit a university to discipline off-campus speech it said affected school relations in the 2011 Minnesota v. Tatro case.

"The First Amendment document called this the chilling effect," said Charles Davis, University of Missouri's facilitator of the Media of the Future Initiative for Mizzou Advantage. "It makes people think twice about what they are saying."

A representative of the Student Press Law Center agreed that university students should not be judged on the same standard as high school students.

"We do not think that a university can justify giving its students no greater level of First Amendment protection than 14-year-olds in the ninth grade have," said Frank D. LoMonte, executive director of the Student Press Law Center. "College students are legally adults who are old enough to fully participate in the political process, and there should be no punishment for the content of their speech except for extreme circumstances, such as threats of violence."

Some professors are worried censorship of free speech and free expression is dangerous to the open-minded environment a student is supposed to learn in in a university setting. However, in the Tatro decision, the court bypassed the differences between the primary and secondary schools and focused on the one similarity between the two: both decisions concerned students.

"It's all about the extension of logic," Davis said. "So the courts ignore the age distinction, focusing instead myopically on the fact that whether high school or college, these people are first students, and so they elevate the student status over the age distinction. This is why Hazelwood is so dangerous: it established the broad rule that school-sponsored speech could be curtailed, which leads to this kind of mischief."

The 6th Circuit Court is not the only federal appellate court that has ruled in favor of university censorship. A circuit court granted Kentucky State University the right to pull a student yearbook for viewpoint comments in 1999, and the 6th Circuit Court granted Governors State University the right to censor the school newspaper for printing comments against the administration. The judges in both cases cited Hazelwood as a precedent in 2005.

"I think we need an anti-Hazelwood statute in the worst way," Davis said. "I think it would be fantastic to be able to repudiate this decision."

Although courts are giving universities more censorship power over student speech, University of Missouri adjunct associate professor of law Sandy Davidson doesn't believe it will have a huge effect on students.

"Just because an institution can engage in censorship or editing doesn't mean the institution would exercise the power," Davidson said.

Davidson said applying the Hazelwood decision is more about quality control than censorship. According to Davidson, anything that has a school stamp of approval on it becomes a quality issue.

However, Davis believes it might cause students to organize their own publications.

"School publications on campus might think hard about staying on campus or go independent, which is probably the last thing school officials want to happen," Davis said.

Regardless of the circuit courts' rulings, states such as Iowa, Arkansas and California have passed legislation similar to the College Campus Press Act, a 2008 Illinois law that specifically protects student journalists from administrative censorship at public universities in the state. Missouri does not currently offer this protection to students.

"If students in Missouri are alarmed that their state might be the next to fall under Hazelwood -- and they should be alarmed -- then they should get copies of the excellent laws on the books in places like California and Illinois and lobby their state legislators for the same level of protection," LoMonte said. "Students should also pressure their own schools to put rules on the books accepting that Hazelwood has no place on a college campus."

See the original post here:
censorship laws become an important issue in schools and universities

This Week in Unnecessary Censorship – Oscar Sunday Edition – Video

27-02-2012 01:38 Jimmy Kimmel Live - This Week in Unnecessary Censorship - Oscar Sunday Edition Jimmy Kimmel Live's YouTube channel features clips and recaps of every episode from the late night TV show on ABC. Subscribe for clips from the monologue, the interviews, and musical performances every day of the week. Watch your favorites parts again, or catch-up on any episodes you may have missed Channel: http://www.youtube.com Subscribe: http://www.youtube.com

Excerpt from:
This Week in Unnecessary Censorship - Oscar Sunday Edition - Video