Mediaboss Marketing

Issued on: 03/03/2022 - 16:19

Sending push notifications through a face-swapping app, adding pictures of the devastation from the bombings in Ukraine to Google Maps, hacking electric chargers These are some of the tricks that are being used by Ukrainians to bypass Russian President Vladimir Putins strict censorship, and to make sure that accurateinformation about thewarin Ukraine reaches everyday Russians.

President Putin has blocked or limited access to foreign news coverage in Russia about the war in Ukraine, including Facebook and Twitter. Russias state communications and media watchdog Roskomnadzor has also passed a censorship law forbidding Russian journalists from using the words war, invasion or offensive when talking about the special operation in Ukraine.

In response, ordinary Ukrainians have been finding creative ways of fighting the Kremlins disinformation campaign and informing people in Russia about what is really going on.

The face-swapping app Reface, which is based in Kyiv, has launched a global information campaign to spread the news, share photos of destruction in Ukrainian cities and encourage its users to stand with Ukraine. The FRANCE 24 Observers team spoke to the companys CEO, Dima Shvets.

When Russia first invaded Ukraine, we sent out a push notification to our users with a message: Russia has invaded Ukraine. Users who opened the app were then presented with more details about the situation on the ground, including images and videos.

Nine million notifications have currently been sent worldwide and two million have been delivered to users in Russia. We have also moved up to the seventh place in the US App store.

Our app was previously used to take the faces of users and put them onto the bodies of celebrities. Since Russias invasion, we have been encouraging everyone to swap themselves into President Zelensky.

All new videos created by the app feature a watermark that includes the Ukrainian flag and the hashtag #StandWithUkraine.

On Monday, February 28, the hacking group Anonymous incited people to leave fake reviews of Russian businesses and restaurants in Google Maps to inform citizens about the conflict in Ukraine. The group tweeted: Go to Google Maps. Go to Russia. Find a restaurant or business and write a review. When you write the review, explain what is happening in Ukraine.

The tweet quickly gained traction. Reviews have been filling up across Russia with news about the conflict in Ukraine. For example, one of the reviews for a Moscow restaurant called Romantic reads 5,800 Russian soldiers died today, 4,500 yesterday. Stop your aggression, dont let your kids suffer, if you go to war you will not come back. Another review for the same place reads Food is great, but your leader is killing innocent people in Ukraine!!! Stop this war.

Google Maps allows users to upload photos of places usually as part of a review of the spot but users have also been using this feature to get images from Ukraine into Russia.

One of the images frequently posted for these locations is a screenshot of a phone that allegedly belonged to a Russian soldier, showing an apparent text conversation with his mother (see below).

Google Maps has since disabled reviews in Russia and Ukraine after they were used as a space to protest against the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

A Google spokesperson said in a statement: "Due to a recent increase in contributed content on Google Maps related to the war in Ukraine, we've put additional protections in place to monitor and prevent content that violates our policies for Maps, including temporarily blocking new reviews, photos, and videos in the region."

In a more organised effort, Russian electric charging points for cars were hacked to show messages of support for Ukraine, which included Glory to Ukraine and Putin is a d***head.

Caption: A car charging station on Russia's M11 highway

In a Facebook post, the Russian energy company, Rosseti, claimed that the Ukrainian company which provided some of the parts had hacked the charging points to which it still had access.

This effort is part of a wave of cyber campaigns targeted at Russia. The international hacking collective Anonymous has claimed responsibility for various cyberattacks, including on Russias state broadcaster RT and over 300 Russian websites.

The moves came after Anonymous declared itself to be in a cyber warfare campaign against Putin and his allies.

Can campaigns like this have a meaningful impact? The FRANCE 24 Observers team asked Valentina Shapovalova, a specialist in Russian media and propaganda at the University of Copenhagen.

I think that its still too early to see how effective these measures will be. But its still incredibly interesting to see how many regular citizens are participating in bottom-up counter-propaganda measures and to see how creative they are getting.

But we shouldnt underestimate the strength of Putins information warfare, he has been suffocating the information space for decades and there is now very little room for anything else to get into the minds of citizens. The same narratives have been replayed in the Russian media for years, Putin has been priming Russians with his propaganda efforts. And when you tell the same story again and again people start to believe it as true. Its so deeply rooted that reviews on Google Maps may not have the impact that they should.

Another very important strategy that the Kremlin has been using is to create confusion and fog, to spit out so many stories and so many contradictory images and news that people get confused and dont know what the truth is anymore.

Some of the grand narratives that the government has been feeding to Russians include the narrative that the Ukrainian government is a Nazi government installed by the West, that the Russian-speaking people in Ukraine have been oppressed since 2014 and that the Ukrainian government is exercising genocide.

More than one million people have already fled Ukraine and hundreds of civilians are believed to have been killed as a result of the war.

Visit link:
How Ukrainians are bypassing Russian censorship to share news of the war - The France 24 Observers

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Big Tech is aligning with U.S. intel agencies and other nations' bureaucracies during the Russian invasion of Ukraine to censor anyone who does not hold what they consider the prevailing or correct view, Tucker Carlson said Tuesday on "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

While there is no substantive support for Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, allowing Big Tech and the intelligence community to jointly "curate everything you learn about the war being fought in your name in Ukraine and censor anyone who disagrees with them, and the censorship is increasing," Carlson told journalist Glenn Greenwald.

HUNTER BIDEN'S $2 MILLION LIBYA BOMBSHELL MORE PROOF MEDIA LIED: GREENWALD

Greenwald called such behavior "quite odious" and echoed Carlson's warnings about the U.S. security state aligning with Big Tech, under the pretext of the Russia invasion in this latest iteration.

"They have huge contracts, the Pentagon, the CIA for cloud services, for all kinds of other services, and so often their censorship is purely aligned with U.S. foreign policy," he said.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"And I'm so grateful for the First Amendment because without it, I'm certain that we would have all kinds of laws being enacted empowering the state not just to ban ideas, but to criminalize them as well."

Greenwald added that while the Constitution bans government from direct censorship, entities have apparently found a loophole in that lawmakers summon tech executives to Congress and threaten "regulatory reprisals" if they don't censor more.

"It also bans the government from pressuring or coercing private actors to censor on their behalf in the way the Constitution prohibits," he said. "And that's exactly what's been happening and still is happening ever more so with this war."

Read more here:
Greenwald warns of censor-happy Big Tech's relationship with national security bureaucracy - Fox News

Responding to the news that the Kremlin has censored domestic media as it disperses anti-war protests and persecutes those who publicly oppose Russias invasion of Ukraine, Marie Struthers, Amnesty Internationals Eastern Europe and Central Asia Director, said:

As thousands of protesters take to the streets across Russia to denounce the war, the Kremlin remains hellbent on stifling state critics as it coerces domestic media into supporting its policies. By using force to disperse anti-war rallies and censoring the press, the Russian authorities are plunging deeper and deeper into repression as public sentiment against the war grows.

As thousands of protesters take to the streets across Russia to denounce the war, the Kremlin remains hellbent on stifling state critics as it coerces domestic media into supporting its policies

Amid its desperation to silence dissent, Russia is also using state-controlled companies to muzzle those who speak out against the conflict. The removal of television presenter Ivan Urgant and the sidelining of respected journalist Elena Chernenko, who was excluded from a government press pool for composing an anti-war letter, speaks to the states sheer disregard for press freedom.

As Russia engages in indiscriminate attacks in violation of international humanitarian law as part of its invasion of Ukraine, the authorities are trampling on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly in Russia while promoting its narrative of the conflict. The authorities brutal crackdown on those who express their dissent regarding the war must stop now.

Background

On 24 February 2021, Russian media watchdog Roskomnadzor ordered all media to only use information provided by official state sources while covering Russias invasion of Ukraine. Anyone caught disobeying this order could see their websites blocked and be fined up to $62,600.

On 28 February, the watchdog blocked the site of Nastoyashchee Vremya (Current Times), a RFE/RL subsidiary, for spreading unreliable publicly important information about the conflict. On 27 February, the Prosecutor Generals office issued statement threatening prosecution under high treason charges for any type of assistance to a foreign state, international or foreign organization or their representatives in activities directed against the security of the Russian Federation.

Over the first four days of invasion, Russian police routinely used force to disperse nationwide anti-war protests. According to human rights NGO OVD-Info, over 5,900 peaceful protesters have been arrested in at least 67 cities and towns across Russia. On 24 February, political philosopher Grigory Yudin was beaten unconscious by the police and briefly hospitalized.

Right now, people in Ukraine are facing a catastrophic human rights crisis. People are dying, including children, and many thousands of lives are at risk. Take action to demand that the Russian authorities stop this act of aggression and protect civilians now.

Read the original post:
Russia: Kremlin censors media and disperses protesters opposed to Ukraine invasion - Amnesty International

By Albert Chang-Yoo

House Bill 1807, is circulating in the Washington State Legislature and echoes a rising GOP talking point about the need for transparency in schools. Representative Joe Walsh (R-19) first filed the bill on January 6th, stating that the legislature believes parents have become discouraged by the radical rhetoric of some state consultants who speak of their goals to destabilize and tear down the states basic education system and curricula.

HB 1807 proposes banning K-12 teachings which suggest that the United States is structurally racist or sexist, disincentivizing student activism, requiring a U.S. civics course with specified readings, and a provision which states that classes may not be compelled to discuss a particular current event or currently controversial topic in public policy or social affairs, including writings derived from or related to such resources as The 1619 Project.

The Republican sponsored bill will most likely fail as the Washington state legislature is controlled by Democrats in both houses. However, the bill is indicative of the nationwide push by conservatives to reform the education system. States such as Ohio, Georgia, and Michigan are introducing bills which would mandate teachers post their curriculum online for parental review. Some Texas school districts have banned childrens books about race and gender identity. In Florida, a bill to discourage discussion about sexual orientation deemed Dont Say Gay is advancing through the legislature.

Since President Joe Bidens inauguration, 37 states have proposed bills challenging so-called woke teachings. Of that total, 14 states have successfully passed laws censoring classrooms, and 16 states still have bills going through the legislature.

For the GOP, education transparency is a winning political message. In the 2021 Virginia Gubernatorial race, Democrat Terry McAuliffe cost himself when he stated, I dont think parents should be telling schools what they should teach in a debate over schools. The issue of parent choice was seized by Republican candidate Glenn Youngkin, who shot up in suburban polling and ultimately won the Governors seat in the blue state.

Professor Terry Beck has spent 19 years working in public schools and 23 years at the University of Puget Sound. According to him these bills are designed to avoid tough conversations, specifically for white children: They dont say white children, they say anybody uncomfortable due to race, but they mean white children. He believes that although the concerns should not be entirely dismissed, this couching it as transparency is Its disingenuous. Because Ive been a teacher And I never felt like I was getting away with anything.

Clearly, parents have an interest in their childs education, nobody would deny that. Nobody cares about that child like the parent does, Professor Beck said. He says that the interest of education also lies with other citizens and state: I have an interest in whether a child is raised to hate people or not; whether their child is raised with principles of equality and of the value of a human.

Professor Beck says the most important thing that these bills are omitting are the interests of the children themselves. They have an interest in their own education that goes beyond their parents, beyond the stateAnd in schools, we have some obligation to help all children see beyond the parochial and to see what, what life is and what life might be.

According to Professor Beck, bills appealing to supposed parental concern play into a consumerist notion that the school works for the parent. In reality, Professor Beck believes that teaching is built on foundations of a working relationship.

The idea of total parental control in education is nothing new, he says, we argue about this constantly. And it comes up in different iterations, different formats, around school reform around schools all the time. Professor Beck points to the debate over the teaching of secular humanism. At the time, parents in several states accused public schools of being anti-Christian and objected to books like The Diary of Anne Frank.

Education is an inherently political endeavor, Professor Beck says. Its always contentiousthese sort of perennial issues about who controls education? What is the role of the parent, the teacher, the school board is? Those are not going away.

Nonetheless, Professor Beck wants schools to be a place for reconciling social and political issues: schools were originally conceived as a place where we learn to live together. We learn to talk across differencesI hope we will choose that were going to be an intelligent, informed citizenry in the future, and empathetic and caring about people.

See original here:
GOP pushes new education bill: 'transparency' or censorship? - The Trail - The Puget Sound Trail

Conservatives are rallying against what they call collusion between Big Tech and the federal government, fearing the two powerful entities will censor them under the guise of preventing domestic terrorism.

Large tech platforms from Facebook and YouTube to Spotify and GoFundMe have ratcheted up bans and censorship of users and organizations.

The companies, once viewed as neutral platforms and marketplaces, are increasingly behaving as left-wing activist organizations because of cancel culture, conservatives say.

There seems to be a pretty universal cultural collusion among a bunch of these companies that they dont want dissenting voices to use their products," said Inez Feltscher Stepman, a senior policy analyst at the conservative Independent Womens Forum, on her podcast earlier this month.

At the same time, the federal governments counterterrorism apparatus under President Joe Biden has taken multiple actions recently aimed at curbing speech deemed as extremism and misinformation.

Conservatives challenge the government's definition of misinformation and say new Biden policies will target them.

For example, the Justice Department announced in January the creation of a new domestic terrorism unit that will investigate those who ascribe to extremist anti-government and anti-authority ideologies.

House Republicans also say an FBI whistleblower email shows the agency is using "counterterrorism tools" to monitor violent threats against school employees and teachers in relation to parents protesting local school board decisions.

RUMBLE OFFERS ROGAN $100 MILLION TO QUIT SPOTIFY AND JOIN CENSORSHIP-FREE

Conservatives are perhaps most concerned about a February bulletin from the Department of Homeland Security saying the federal government plans to work with public and private sector partners to reduce the "proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions."

Republicans say that, depending on how the government defines "false or misleading narratives," those who are against mask and vaccine mandates or raise questions about the origins of the coronavirus could be classified as terrorists.

For the government to characterize mainstream political disagreements as something approaching criminality is frightening and sends shivers down my spine, said Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina. Thats what happens in totalitarian regimes. Normal Americans engaging in normal activity and speech shouldnt be conflated with terrorism. Thats very dangerous for the government to be doing."

He added that the federal government and its agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, can and should put out their point of view on problems in society. They can even criticize certain information online as being incorrect, Bishop said, but its not the government's role to criminalize or deter certain speech on private platforms.

At the end of January, U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy urged tech platforms to censor comedian Joe Rogan and use the power that we have to limit the spread of misinformation."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in early February she supported Murthys advice regarding content moderation.

Conservatives say the federal government has threatened to crack down on right-leaning speech for years.

The desire to criminalize certain speech has been brewing for a very long time, and now the Biden bureaucracy is free to make moves that they couldnt under Trump, said Kara Frederick, a tech research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Some high-level bureaucrats want to use counterterrorism tools to suppress mainstream conservative views expressed, and the Jan. 6 attack has given them the perfect excuse to use these new tools."

She added she had met with 21 Republicans in Congress in the past three months, including members in leadership, and they were all concerned about tech companies and the federal governments efforts to reduce misinformation.

GOP Rep. Bishop said he expects Republicans to take back control of the House of Representatives after the midterm elections and will then investigate the federal government's recent actions related to misinformation and domestic terrorism.

"The Republican leadership has a very robust oversight effort planned, with all investigative tools at our disposal to be used," Bishop said. "We will examine the administration and the tech companies very closely, and if that fuels successful litigation, so much the better."

Until 2023, Bishop said, Republicans can only use their platform to express concerns and hold the Biden administration accountable.

Conservatives say Democrats would be equally concerned if a Republican administration were in charge of defining illegal misinformation.

How would the Left feel if it was Trump and his people deciding what is misinformation and we're locking up people based on that? said Dan Gainor, vice president at the Media Research Center, a conservative media watchdog that tracks censorship on Big Tech platforms.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Everybody has to stand their ground and not give in to cancel culture and these misinformation policies. Theyll never be satisfied. You cant placate a pack of hungry lions and ever make them happy. Youve got to fight it, Gainor said.

See the article here:
Conservatives warn of Big Tech-federal government 'collusion' on censorship - Washington Examiner