Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Howard County activists and allies hit back at censorship, hate – Washington Blade

Adiverse crowd of 100 to 200 folks gathered at the Columbia Lakefront on Saturday to attend a rally to push back against censorship in the countys public schools as well as homophobia and transphobia emanating from a group of conservative parents.

The rally called We ARE the People was organized in response to the comments and actions by members of a Maryland-based conservative group We the People 2 that among other things are anti-masks, anti-vaccinations and are opposed to teaching racial history in the schools. They also oppose two books that are in Howard County Public Schools library shelves: Gender Queer and Lawn Boy.

Speakers at a We the People 2 rally last month at an Elkridge warehouse condemned the books, which contain LGBTQ characters, as sexually explicit. The group later filed police reports against the Board of Education alleging the books constitute pornography with graphic sexual content and materials being used and disseminated in public schools, according to the groups press release.A flier announcing this action used the loaded terminology, We must not allow our children to be abused and victimized.

Among the speakers at the Elkridge rally was Republican Gordana Schifanelli who is running for lieutenant governor on the ticket with Daniel Cox. Another speaker, George Johnson, a teacher from Baltimore City, was heard on a video of the event saying, Were doing Gods work because Marxism, homosexuality and transgenderism is the devil.

In response, the pro-LGBTQ rally in Columbia announced the following:

We are taking a stance against hate in the community as we raise our voices in support of equity in our schools. Attacks on teachers and school staff have prompted us to stand united and drown out the noise.

In addition, We ARE the People states:

We stand for LGBTQ+ students and educational professionals

Teaching accurate history to our students

Supporting equitable practices in our schools

Providing students with relevant LGBTQ+ media through their school libraries

The two-hour rally, which was attended by several county council members, featured speakers representing a wide swath of community, educational, religious and political organizations. They included: Community Allies of Rainbow Youth (CARY), Black Lives Activists of Columbia (BLAC), Absolutely Dragulous, Howard County Schools, PFLAG-Columbia/Howard County,IndivisibleHoCoMd, Columbia Democratic Club, Howard Progressive Project, Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Columbia (UUCC), HoCo Pride, Progressive Democrats of Howard County, and the Columbia United Christian Church.

Many of the speakers denounced the censorship of materials that are needed by many LGBTQ students. Genderqueer and non-binary students, they point out, are most vulnerable and need affirming literature to help with their development and self-acceptance. The speakers also decried hate speech, which has surfaced again, as well as the opposition to teaching history as it relates to race.

Others argued that the community must not sit back and take it from extremist groups.

You are all defenders, said Cynthia Fikes, president of the Columbia Democratic Club, in a fiery speech. But to succeed a strong defense also needs a strong offense.

The two books in question were recently the center of controversy in the Fairfax County (Va.) school system. The books were removed in September from the shelves of the high schools pending a comprehensive review following opposition from a parent at a school board meeting. It should be noted that both books were previous winners of the American Library Associations Alex Awards, which each year recognize 10 books written for adults that have special appeal to young adults, ages 12 through 18.

The board established two committees consisting of parents, staff and students to assess the content of the books and make recommendations to the assistant superintendent of instructional services who would make the final determination.

One committee found that Lawn Boy includes themes that are affirming for students with marginalized identities. There is no pedophilia in the book, the committee added. The other committee found that Gender Queer depicts difficulties non-binary and asexual individuals may face. The committee concluded that the book neither depicts nor describes pedophilia. The books were restored to the shelves.

As this backlash against LGTBQ+ literature demonstrates, we must be ready to stand up and defend the progress we have made, said Jennifer Mallo, member of the Howard County Board of Education, expressing her own point of view. We must ensure our elected officials understand and share our values and will fight for our marginalized students.

The enthusiastic crowd was clearly pleased with the event.

Todays rally was meant to inspire our community to take action, said Chris Hefty, who was the lead organizer of the rally and the emcee. Action that protects our youth. Action that protects our educators and admins. This action comes in the form of advocacy, communication with elected officials so they know your voice, and through well informed voting to ensure those who represent us are those we know will support us. We shared a message of love, acceptance, and warmth.

Hefty adds, The unity we facilitated through this rally was a sight to behold. As the lead organizer I couldnt have been more pleased! In the future we will be sure to better meet the needs of all our community members. We thank all those in our community for their support and feedback and look forward to accomplishing great things together moving forward.

See the original post:
Howard County activists and allies hit back at censorship, hate - Washington Blade

Scottish Ballet rejects censorship claims over changes to The Nutcracker – The Scotsman

The company has made headlines around the world since announcing subtle, but important changes were being made to its version of the 19th century, which it first staged in 1972.

Scottish Ballet has overhauled the costumes and choreography in the sequences depicting Chinese and Arabian culture, as well as having some of its female dancers, play the key role of the magician Drosselmeyer for the first time in its history.

Artistic director Christopher Hampson has admitted the company would not have been discussing making such changes in its shows five years ago, but insisted art had to speak to our times.

He insisted making key changes to The Nutcracker this year would add to and strengthen the heritage of the show, which has just opened at the Festival Theatre in Edinburgh and will go on tour around the UK next year.

In the wake of the Black Lives Matter move, Scottish Ballet publicly admitted its 50-year history includes outdated and racist artistic content.

The company, which has set up an equality and diversity steering group, has previously pledged to ensure better representation of the Gypsy, Romany and Traveller communities in The Snow Queen after reviewing previous depictions.

It has surveyed all of its staff, dancers and board members on anti-racism issues and also held anti-racism workshops.

An article published on Scottish Ballet's website last year stated: Through scrutinising our own history, understanding and accepting the ways in which Scottish Ballet has been part of and benefited from institutional and systemic racism, we hope to encourage others to do the same.

When the changes to The Nutcracker were announced last month, the company said they were being made to ensure it remains relevant today and for the future.

An article in the official programme for the show recalls how The Nutcracker had historically perpetuated racial stereotypes and even yellowface, adding the production had often been played for laughs, involving pointy finger movements, Fu Manchu moustaches, rice paddy hat and a long ponytail hairstyle called a queue, all often worn by white performers.

Mr Hampson states: Art has to reflect who we are, it has to help build empathy for people.

"When we put stereotypes on stage again and again, we are complicit in recreating those stereotypes.

"Why don't we play against that type, create something new, innovate or try new stories?

"Ive heard arguments that were taking something away [by making changes], but I just dont buy that.

"By rectifying inappropriate cultural stereotypes, were adding to the productions heritage, were strengthening it.

"Long after me, this production has a life and will continue and Im sure it will evolve again for the next few decades. Thats how art survives it evolves to speak to our times.

"I dont think wed have been having this conversation even five years ago.

"Within the wider art form, things like diversity and inclusion are only beginning to be discussed. If we see racist stereotypes or if we hear about racism within the ballet world, we need to be addressing it.

Read more:
Scottish Ballet rejects censorship claims over changes to The Nutcracker - The Scotsman

How 9 books started a fight over censorship and pornography in this Utah school district – Salt Lake Tribune

A list of nine books has started a bitter battle in a Utah school district over pornography and censorship and who can control what students read.

The latest culture confrontation began about a month ago, when a mom first emailed administrators at Canyons School District about the titles that she found concerning. She had heard about them on social media and discovered they were in the high school libraries in her districts suburbs at the south end of Salt Lake County.

There are many more but it is exhausting, mentally, watching and reviewing these books content, she wrote in a letter that has since been shared widely online by conservative groups.

Most of the books she listed focus on race and the LGBTQ community, including The Bluest Eye by Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison and Gender Queer, a graphic novel about the authors journey of self-identity that has been at the center of the growing movement over banning books in school districts across the country.

The mom copied on her email a member of Utah Parents United, the group that has led efforts against masking in schools and in favor of dropping a social-emotional learning program, also at Canyons, because it linked to a site about sex.

And from there, debate over the books erupted.

Canyons spokesman Jeff Haney said the district has received hundreds of emails about the books and from parents who want to add more to the list for being too explicit. Utah Parents United has also since released an hourlong video encouraging its members to call their local police departments when they come across materials like this at their school libraries.

Pushing back against them is a growing list of advocates. Librarians and civil rights attorneys who support keeping the books on library shelves say this conflict is about limiting what viewpoints students can seek out on their own with a library card, especially diverse viewpoints from historically marginalized groups. None of the titles, they stress, are required reading.

Richard Price, an associate professor of political science at Weber State who tracks censorship in school districts, said: If you dont want to look at it, then you dont have to check it out. But I fear what this group is trying to do is forbid all people from reading them. Theyre trying to parent for all parents.

In response to the crossfire, the district has decided to temporarily pull the original nine titles from library shelves until it can further review them and its own policy for handling challenges.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Four of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021. The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov and Beyond Magenta by Susan Kuklin.

UNDER REVIEW

The books under review in the Canyons School District are:

The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison, about an 11-year-old Black girl growing up in Ohio that includes scenes about racism and molestation.

Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, which has drawn particular attention for its cartoon drawing of oral sex, but it also covers the confusion around young crushes and being yourself in society.

Beyond Magenta by Susan Kuklin, a nonfiction book based on interviews with six transgender and gender neutral young adults.

l8r, g8r by Lauren Myracle, the third book in a series written in instant messages about three friends navigating high school. Parents have protested this novel because it includes drug use and an inappropriately flirtatious teacher.

Lawn Boy by Jonathan Evison, about a young Mexican American boy examining what it means to be Brown in this country.

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov, which is the only traditionally classic novel on the list and tells the story of a professors pedophiliac relationship with a 12-year-old girl.

Mondays Not Coming by Tiffany Jackson, which is a fictional story about a Black girl who goes missing and whose disappearance is dismissed as just another runaway. The book delves into racism, mental illness, friendship and consent, received the Coretta Scott King-John Steptoe Award for New Talent.

The Opposite of Innocent by Sonya Sones, a story about a teenage girl with a crush on one of her parents male friends.

Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Prez, about the relationship between a young Mexican American girl and a Black teenage boy in 1930s Texas.

The mom stood at the podium and turned to page 200 in the book. She began to read aloud.

The excerpt started with one character telling another: Get your hand off my butt. From there, it gets more explicit, detailing an older cousin molesting a younger boy.

The mom, Jessica Anderson, told the school board for Canyons District that she found the book at Alta High School in Sandy. This book should have never been available to any student, she added during the board meeting on Nov. 8.

One board member urged her to stop reading. Another, Mont Millerberg, shook his head and thanked Anderson for bringing it to their attention. He added: My question is not if those should be taken out or not thats intuitive. My question is, How the hell did they get in there in the first place?

Anderson was reading from a book, All Boys Arent Blue by LGBTQ activist George M. Johnson, which she and others with Utah Parents United are calling to be added to the list of titles to be pulled. They say every book in the district needs to be reviewed for sexual content.

The current policies and practices are not working, Anderson said.

Many of the books in Canyons School Districts libraries are not directly reviewed by school librarians who place them on the shelves. Some are given to the district for free, for instance, and placed in the collection without any more formal process. Thats typical in most schools.

But the districts current written policy, approved mostly recently in May 2020, only allows someone with a direct tie to a school a student who attends there, a parent of a child who attends there, or an employee who works there to raise concerns about a book in that specific schools library. The mom who sent the first email has students in middle and elementary school in Canyons; the books she raised alarms about are in four high schools in the district: Alta, Brighton, Corner Canyon and Jordan.

Haney said if someone objecting to a book doesnt fit the criteria in the policy, then the districts board is instructed to respond with silence and ignore the complaint.

The board, which leans conservative and represents a more right-learning area of the county, has decided that approach doesnt work, after hearing Anderson read the explicit paragraphs. It is now redrafting the policy to be broader and allow for anyone to bring up concerns that will be heard by the full board.

Haney said a committee has already met twice to work on revisions. A new draft is expected to come before the board next week at its regular Tuesday meeting.

During that discussion, a staff member talked about how the initial changes would create a process for any patron to raise concerns about a book and for librarians to more carefully comb through books coming in, based on criteria around age-appropriateness.

Those who oppose removing the books note that the policy does still state that titles are supposed to remain in use during the challenge process until a committee can read them and decide if they are appropriate for students.

They argue that Canyons violated that by taking the books away from students before that plays out. The ACLU of Utah has called it a reminder [that] constitutional protections cannot be simply ignored.

A joint statement from the Utah Educational Library Media Association, Utah Library Association and Utah Library Media Supervisors said due process must be followed to protect the First Amendment and all students rights to access diverse literature.

The states largest teachers union has joined them, as has the National Coalition Against Censorship. Several other national groups are signing on, too, including the Authors Guild, the National Council of Teachers of English and PEN America. Each has written a letter to Canyons District, urging that the books be returned.

Even Republican Utah Gov. Spencer Cox cautioned against a knee-jerk reaction during his November news conference.

Im not saying every book should be in every classroom, the governor said. But lets be thoughtful about it. Lets take a step back, take a deep breath and make sure that were not doing something well regret. Any student of history knows that banning books never ends up well.

State Sen. Kathleen Riebe, D-Cottonwood Heights, is considering running a bill in the upcoming legislative session that would require all public K-12 school districts and charters to follow a set process to review books under challenge before removing them from libraries.

Without set criteria, she and others worry that schools and school districts could easily throw out any material considered controversial by one parent; that one obscenity or one sex scene taken out of context could get a book tossed.

Libraries aim to expand readers perspectives, including providing books on subjects outside their comfort zones, and an interested patron should be able to access such titles, book defenders say.

When people can learn these things and read books, you can be so much kinder and compassionate and see outside of your bubble, said Wanda Mae Huffaker, a librarian with the Salt Lake County library system.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Salt Lake County Library System Librarian Wanda Mae Huffaker, Nov. 23, 2021.

Huffaker has studied intellectual freedom and defended books against being censored in Utah schools. When Davis School District pulled the book In Our Mothers House, about lesbian moms, from its shelves in 2012, she helped get it returned. And the district was required to pay out legal fees and agree in a settlement to never remove a book again based solely on its LGBTQ content.

Huffaker also notes that curriculum what students must learn in the classroom is different and separate from content in libraries, and she asserts they cannot be held to the same standards.

The book that is causing the most division on the list of nine titles in Canyons School District is Gender Queer considered the top banned book in the country right now.

Huffaker says its currently available in Salt Lake Countys public libraries, where its also been challenged but remains on shelves.

When I read that one, I thought I dont understand what that feels like because Ive never been there, she said. And it made me appreciate so much and to relate to that. It opened my eyes. Thats what literature does.

Huffaker, who is 64, said she recalls a little girl who frequently came into the Tyler Branch in Midvale where she works. One day, the librarian asked her how many brothers and sisters she had. The girl struggled.

She said she had two brothers, two sisters and one sibling that was both a boy and a girl. Huffaker said that experience, shortly before reading Gender Queer, also opened her eyes. And now she asks a more gender neutral question about siblings.

She worries what message removing the book sends to students like that or students who are LGBTQ and looking for a book that shows their experience. She believes those opposed to it are turning only to the controversial pages of the graphic novel, which does include some graphic depictions, and not considering the book as a whole.

Troy Williams, executive director for Equality Utah, added: This is about censorship. And it is immoral to try to deprive minority students in Utah from their culture and the voices that reflect their lives.

After the book was banned in Texas, author Maia Kobabe told The Texas Tribune: I also want to have the best interest of young people at heart. There are queer youth at every high school and those students, thats [who] Im thinking about, is the queer student who is getting left behind.

Utah Parents United, though, insists that the group is not trying to eradicate books about the gay community. They say their target is explicit sexual content. They call it pornography both written and drawn in the form of the cartoons in Gender Queer.

When asked for comment, the group said, this is our statement, and shared tens of images from each of the books on its list, showing excerpts of explicit scenes, pages detailing the use of condoms and lubricants, sexual positions, and one encouraging masturbation. Others were screenshots of rape scenes.

Its just so shocking, said Brooke Stephens, the curriculum director for Utah Parents United. I think Gender Queer needs to get out now.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe is one of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021.

She said the scene in the graphic novel where the main character is forced to perform oral sex on another man is beyond inappropriate for high schoolers, with those as young as 14 years old being able to check it out in Canyons School District.

This isnt about the left or right deciding no Dr. Seuss or no Tom Sawyer, Stephens added. Its not about debatable books. Its about explicit porn.

But Price, the professor studying censorship at Weber State, who is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns, said its not about porn.

The examples of sex in the books on the list, including Gender Queer, arent about titillation, Price said. Theyre about relationship imbalances and manipulation often real experiences from the authors that are meant to show the reader how the situation is wrong and warn them if theyre going through something similar.

Its about figuring our where your boundaries are and drawing them. Thats very healthy, Price said.

Amanda Darrow, the director of youth, family and education at the Utah Pride Center, said thats especially important in a conservative state where it can be difficult to be LGBTQ or talk openly about it.

Emma Houston, who works on diversity issues at the University of Utah, also worries that the targeted books are largely about experiences of race. Of the nine books, six directly address racism.

Its saying that were removing your lived experience. Its saying that individuals who look like you are not valued, said Houston, special assistant to the U.s vice president of equity, diversity and inclusion.

Shes particularly concerned about Toni Morrison novels being removed. Morrison, an award-winning author, wrote about what it means to be Black.

Utah Parents United say they object to The Bluest Eye, though, because of a rape scene; and Stephens points to her four adopted children, who are all Black and attend Davis School District (where there have been severe cases of racism reported) as a way to say that, to her, its not about race.

She says, though, that she believes parents should individually talk about race issues with their children. For instance, she does not support discussion of critical race theory which academics define as the history of race and slavery as a founding principle of America in the classroom. There is no evidence its being taught in K-12 schools in Utah.

But Houston says that should absolutely be allowed in books in the library. And, she added, the rape in The Bluest Eye is obviously brutal, but its a piece that cant be overlooked. Its part of the whole book as much as its part of a system that doesnt help people of color when they experience assault, she said.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison is one of nine books that have been removed from schools in the Canyons School District and placed under review, Nov. 23, 2021.

She also worries whats next. Will Asian writers be removed? Hispanic authors? Will students only see one perspective about being white? Houston doesnt support the books being removed, but if they are, she would like to see each book by an author of color replaced by another, to keep a diverse collection in school libraries.

In a statement, thee NAACP of Salt Lake backed the review and said it believes all material should be age-appropriate.

It is not about the titles but the contents within these books that the NAACP is concerned about through these book challenges, said President Jeanetta Williams in a statement. The NAACP would like to see the process play out.

Price said it would be unfair to ignore that the challenges from the books are also largely coming from straight white women, the professor believes. Price noted thats been a trend across the country, where book ban challenges are popping up largely in white suburbs that have been starting to become more diverse. That includes where Canyons School District sits in Salt Lake County.

Utah Parents United is organizing to review books in every district in the state. And Stephens has started a Facebook page where parents can report titles to her that they find concerning. Its everywhere, Stephens said. I dont think people know whats inside these books.

A parent in Washington County School District in Southern Utah sent a list of five titles to administrators there that she took issue with being in elementary schools. Those include Julin is a Mermaid, which is a picture book about a boy who wants to become a mermaid, as well as The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas. That books deals with racism and police brutality, and the parent said she objects to the profanities in it.

Washington County School District spokesman Steven Dunham said the district is following a set process to review the books, with a committee that is expected to read all of each one.

He said districts should balance whats age appropriate with providing diverse titles that represent all kids.

I also think its interesting how parents are challenging these books in our libraries, he added. This is the place that they think their children are going to be corrupted. But they are also giving them phones where they can look up anything.

The school board is expected to weigh in on the titles in January.

Haney, the Canyons spokesman, said the district there also cares about making sure titles are representative. He did a search of the library system in the district and found 102 titles with the keyword transgender, 44 with queer and 31 with LGBTQ.

But now some parents are asking for a full catalog of every book so they can review whats available.

Possible solutions are just as debated. Allowing parents to block books on a students account wont stop them from looking at the same titles if their peers check them out, Stephens said.

And putting them in a separate office to check out is othering, Darrow with the Utah Pride Center added. Some students might also not want their parents to know what theyre reading, as it could reveal their identity, Darrow said.

This latest effort to ban books is the broadest and most organized Huffaker has ever seen, she said, and to her, seeing it play out feels like a campaign out of George Orwells 1984.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Lily Aguilar, 10, reads in the Children's Section of the Ruth Vine Tyler Library, Nov. 23, 2021.

Here is the original post:
How 9 books started a fight over censorship and pornography in this Utah school district - Salt Lake Tribune

GOP Claim That Biden FCC Nom Gigi Sohn Wants To ‘Censor Conservatives’ Is AT&T & Rupert Murdoch Backed Gibberish – Techdirt

from the fluff-and-nonsense dept

We'd already noted how telecom and media giants are hard at work trying to scuttle the nomination of consumer advocate Gigi Sohn to the FCC. Sohn is not only a genuine reformer, she's broadly popular on both sides of the aisle in telecom and media circles. So companies like AT&T and News Corporation, which enjoyed no limit of ass kissing during the Trump era, are working overtime to come up with some feeble talking points loyal politicians can use to oppose her nomination. It's not going well.

About the best they could come up with was the entirely false claim that Sohn wants to "censor Conservatives." Anybody who actually knows Sohn knows the claim isn't true, and she's historically gone well out of her way to embrace policies that encourage diversity in media and speech, even when she doesn't agree with the speaker. Despite being a nonsense claim, it has been broadly peppered across the right wing echo chamber, including the usual columns at Breitbart, editorials by the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board, Tucker Carlson, and elsewhere.

The claim popped up again at last week's nomination hearing before a Senate Judiciary Committee courtesy of Senators Ted Cruz and Dan Sullivan:

"Federal Communications Commission nominee Gigi Sohn faced off against Republican senators at a nomination hearing yesterday, disputing the senators' shaky claims that she would use a post at the FCC to censor conservatives. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) repeated arguments previously made by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and The Wall Street Journal editorial board, which mostly boil down to complaints about Sohn's tweets criticizing Fox News and her criticism of Sinclair Broadcast Group."

As we've long noted, the claims that Conservatives are being "censored" in general (either on the internet or on traditional television) aren't remotely true. In fact Conservatives have not only built a massive right wing infotainment universe with a violent disdain for factual reality (OAN, NewsMax, Fox News, Breitbart, Facebook, YouTube, Blaze), they've mastered the art of trolling for outrage engagement, which generally involves saying inflammatory gibberish, then enjoying the added exposure from left-wing outrage retweets and ad-engagement obsessed clickbait coverage. Pretty much the exact opposite of "censorship."

What's usually deemed "censorship" is usually just fairly flimsy and short-lived accountability for spewing false or bigoted nonsense. And while the Trump GOP pretends to be mad at "big tech" for "censorship," what they're actually mad about is the fact that social media belatedly and inconsistently started reining in GOP race-baiting propaganda, a cornerstone of party power in the face of an unfavorable shift in demographics and a sagging electorate. The GOP has zero interest in genuine antitrust reform (see: forty straight years of U.S. history), but the pretense that they do provides handy cover for an agenda that's exclusively self-serving.

The new Trump GOP is currently a party of performative gibberish, entirely untethered from reality, propped up largely thanks to propaganda shoveled into the brains of low-information voters, tricked into rooting against their best self interests via a massive, well-funded coalition of traditional cable and online companies (again, quite the opposite of "censorship"). And outside of perhaps reining in media consolidation and encouraging more competition, there's not a whole lot the FCC can do about it from a policy perspective, given inevitable 1A challenges and a rightward-lurching Supreme Court. Even if Sohn wanted to "censor Conservatives" (which again, she doesn't) she'd find it an impossible task within the confines of the FCC and legal reality.

The great irony in the GOP/News Corp/AT&T alliance's effort to smear Sohn as somebody looking to "censor Conservatives?" Right wing news outlets like Newsmax and AT&T-funded OAN actually support her nomination because she's historically worked to encourage diversity in media viewpoints and healthy competition in media markets. Sohn highlighted as much at the hearing:

"I would say, look at my record. Look at the conservative cable channels that I worked with for years to get them carriage on cable systems when those systems would not carry them. I have long worked with organizations and companies with whom I vigorously disagree on their point of viewfervent Republicans, fervent supporters of the previous presidentand I worked with them to get their views online. I believe that I have been characterized very unfairly as being anti-conservative speech. I think my record says otherwise."

It's kind of hard to smear somebody as a fan of "conservative censorship" when outlets like OAN and Newsmax, which routinely traffic in truly repugnant garbage, say she's always been even-handed when dealing with them. Check out this statement supporting Sohn by OAN President Charles Herring:

"She believes in the First Amendment and the advantages of a strong and open media for the benefit of our democracy. She is one of the most knowledgeable persons I know on FCC issues and has the common sense and desire to work with people on both sides of the aisle."

As usual with the broader Trump GOP, this isn't about policy, it's about money and power. AT&T and News Corporation don't want Sohn appointed because she'd not only break a 2-2 partisan gridlock in voting at the FCC, she actively supports holding telecom and media giants accountable for bad behavior. That's in pretty stark contrast to the last four years of the Trump FCC, which basically involved coddling entrenched telecom and media giants at every conceivable opportunity, even if that required a whole lot of lying and legally dubious behavior.

If you're a Trump-allied GOP lawmaker you can't just come out and say you're opposing Sohn's nomination because you're lodged up AT&T and Rupert Murdoch's ass and the only thing you care about is protecting their revenues so campaign contributions keep flowing. So instead you glom on to the Trump GOP's perpetual victimization complex to not only change the subject (away from the fact you're an enabler of anti-competitive monopolists and have been for decades), but distract and agitate the base with false outrage and victimization porn. Sohn can be approved to the post without GOP support, so in the end most of this is little more than a delay tactic and empty calorie performative gibberish, much like the lion's share of the modern Trump GOP policy platform.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyones attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise and every little bit helps. Thank you.

The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: 1st amendment, anti-conservative bias, fcc, gigi sohn, grandstanding, politics, ted cruzCompanies: newsmax, oan

Read this article:
GOP Claim That Biden FCC Nom Gigi Sohn Wants To 'Censor Conservatives' Is AT&T & Rupert Murdoch Backed Gibberish - Techdirt

Infiel: what Cansu Dere thinks about censorship in Turkish soap operas – Market Research Telecast

In Turkey, as in several countries in the Middle East, audiovisual productions such as movies, soap operas or series must be developed respecting the laws and traditions of their respective territory and all this is supervised by the government of the day. That is why in Turkish dramas you hardly ever see risque scenes and an example of this is the soap opera Unfaithful.

In recent years, one of the countries that has been considered the cradle of successful international soap operas is Turkey. In his different productions, intimate or related scenes are not seen. This is because it is established by the Supreme Council of Radio and Television (RTUK).

This entity of the Turkish government has the function of ordering that all audiovisual productions follow to the letter the ethical rules suitable for all audiences. These rules are strictly based on traditional values. That is why scenes where alcohol consumption is observed, risque scenes or of that nature are censored.

The protagonist of the telenovela Unfaithful, Cansu Dere He ruled on this type of situation that has become normal in his country due to the fact that there are laws which have been established to be respected.

During her time in Spain, the famous actress gave an interview to some media and was consulted on this issue.

Censorship always limits, in any field, be it your work or your normal life. There is a limitation in our work, obviously. There are rules that we have to comply with by the country in which we are living. It is not very good to have so many limitations, but we have to complyCansu Dere expressed.

But this only, as revealed by the actress, happens with the productions of the state channels, something that does not happen with the pay channels.

Beyond the theme in which the telenovela revolves UnfaithfulWhich is Volkans infidelity towards Asya, the actress pointed out that the messages that can be seen in Turkish productions can help more people to get out of the situation they are in if they are going through a similar case.

There are many women who are experiencing infidelities in their real life. Through my last job (Infidel) a woman who has suffered from infidelity can imagine how she can fight in society and how she can get what she deserves. Asyas fight inspires many women in Turkish society, assured.

In an interview with the journalists to the actress, Cansu YouShe was also asked how she would feel if she made a bawdy scene in a series in Spain, because she is not used to doing this type of production.

Working in Spain, participating in a series would be fantastic for me, it would be another triumph, but I always see the works (productions), I get the script, the story, I value it and I give my answer. I would love to be in Spain working, He sentenced.

Cansu Dere He was born in Ankara on October 14, 1980, so, in 2021. At first, his career was planned to be different, because he studied Archeology at Istanbul University. He studied for two years and, in 2004, his life changed drastically.

Article Source

Disclaimer: This article is generated from the feed and not edited by our team.

View post:
Infiel: what Cansu Dere thinks about censorship in Turkish soap operas - Market Research Telecast