Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Fit to print: press censorship & propaganda during the Civil War – RTE.ie

Analysis: how both sides used and abused the press during the Civil War shows the importance placed on newspaper coverage

Before and after the outbreak of Civil War in Ireland in June 1922, those opposed to the Anglo Irish Treaty found themselves in control of much of the south and south-west of Ireland. The proliferation of anti-Treatyite areas within the southern province of Munster gave rise to what is now often referred to as the Republic of Munster or Munster republic.

John Horgan tells us that both sides recognised that the newspapers were as important as any territory being fought over, and both sides evolved media management techniques that varied from the persuasive to the intimidatory

The end of the Munster republic was signalled by the anti-Treatyite evacuation of Cork City on August 10th, before which the offices of the citys leading dailies, the Cork Examiner and Cork Constitution, had been destroyed. One of the most invaluable accounts of these turbulent days comes from Frank Geary, then a journalist with the Irish Independent and later its editor, who kept a diary of the hectic final days of this republic.

We need your consent to load this rte-player contentWe use rte-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences

From RT Brainstorm, how the Civil War split an Irish republican family in two

As anti-Treatyites headed west with the express intention of a commencing a guerrilla conflict, Geary grimly recalled "Elizabeth Fort, off Barrack Street, is in flames. The Bridewell in Cornmarket Street is blazing. Tuckey Street police barracks is a mass of fire. Empress Place Police Barracks way up on Tuckey Hill is belching forth mountains of smoke and, further up, what seems like very hell itself seems on fire. The latter is Victoria Barracks, which is completely in the grip of the flames.

"No words can adequately picture such weird and horrifying scenes. I have had experience now of four of them; I have seen them in Belfast, Dublin, Limerick and now Cork, and God knows, I dont want to see any more of them. One does not get accustomed to this kind of thing. It is the end. Cork has fallen."

The division surrounding the terms of the Treaty were expressed very early in Cork via suppressive action and press manipulation. Professor Alfred O'Rahilly from UCC had his pamphlet, 'The Case for the Treaty,' seized by armed censors in late December 1921 while the Treaty Debates were ongoing. Following the 64-57 vote in favour of the Treaty by members of Dil ireann on January 7th 1922, a proclamation highlighting the shortcomings of the Treaty terms were published in the Cork Examiner under duress; more specifically at the designation of Tom Barry, the prominent anti-Treaty IRA leader in Cork.

We need your consent to load this rte-player contentWe use rte-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences

From RT Radio 1's Today With Claire Byrne, historian and author Diarmaid Ferriter on his book Between Two Hells: The Irish Civil War

Days after this incident, B.J. Long, the editor of Clonmel newspaper the Nationalist, was accosted by volunteers who served him with an order from the Acting Adjutant, 3rd Tipperary Brigade. Having refused to publish an article submitted to him previously, Long was warned that failure to comply in the future would result in suppression. Copies of the paper were confiscated from newsboys soon after. That night, the newspaper itself was raided with 'expert' damage being wrought on printing presses, linotype machines and gas engines.

The anti-Treatyites perceived ascendancy in the south was challenged by Commandant General Piaras Basla in his new role as Army Publicity Director, which made him Chief Press Censor for the Free State forces. Baslas censorship came in for intense criticism from anti-Treatyites with Poblacht na h-ireann claiming that everybody realises by now, we hope, that the Irish daily press, always bitterly anti-national, is now, under Free State censorship, simply war propaganda for the Anglo-Free State Alliance.

Basla was massively assisted in his endeavours by the widespread co-operation of the press in applying his directives. A system of prior scrutiny existed under his watch, whereby newspapers had to be submitted for approval to him and his team before being permitted to circulate.

We need your consent to load this rte-player contentWe use rte-player to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review their details and accept them to load the content.Manage Preferences

From RT Archives, Piaras Basla remembers 1916

The censors also addressed wires being sent to the international press, newspapers entering the country from abroad and pictures and films relating to the situation in Ireland. They also issued official bulletins from general headquarters of the National Army to the press and liaising with the Government Publicity Department. Under this system, newspapers were required to obtain permits for their journalists to report from areas of conflict.

Destruction of rail tracks meant other papers could not get into Munster, meaning anti-Treaty rhetoric in the Constitution and Examiner went unchallenged. While opposition propaganda could not penetrate the Republic, attempts to disseminate information had mixed results. In Ernie O'Malleys Civil War correspondence, there were suggestions that the Examiner should be sold around the country as a means of counter-acting the decidedly pro-Treaty stance of national dailies like the Irish Times, Irish Independent and Freeman's Journal.

Press control during and after the reign of the Munster republic exemplifies the importance the belligerents placed on the press at this time, along with the potential for suppression that this turbulent time facilitated. While intimidation of the press was not a Munster phenomenon during the war, the energy with which it was carried out appears to correlate to a certain extent to the manner in which the war was fought in the province more broadly.

While both sides of the conflict pursued censorship and suppression with a previously unseen commitment, it would take a seemingly interminable number of months for the conflict as a whole to burn out while the contrasting smell of newspaper ink and petrol persisted.

The Irish Civil War National Conference takes place at UCC from June 15 to 18. Proceedings will be open to the public and will be streamed by RT History

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not represent or reflect the views of RT

Originally posted here:
Fit to print: press censorship & propaganda during the Civil War - RTE.ie

The shameful censorship of The Lady of Heaven – spiked – Spiked

The Lady of Heaven is a new historical epic, portraying the life of Fatima, a child of the Prophet Muhammad. Yasser Al-Habib, the Shia Muslim cleric who wrote the screenplay, claims the film conveys a message of love and peace.

Not all agree, it seems. Since the films release on Friday, groups of Muslim protesters across England have been protesting outside cinemas, claiming The Lady of Heaven hurts the feelings and the sentiments of a billion people around the world. Now, citing the protests, Cineworld has pulled the film from all of its cinemas nationwide, while Vue has pulled it from some of its branches. This is a shocking, illiberal and profoundly worrying development.

The protesters claim to be outraged, above all, by the fact that the film depicts Muhammad on screen (using computer-generated imagery rather than a single actor). This, they say, is forbidden by Islamic law.

Fundamentalist Muslims are calling the film blasphemous and demanding its censorship. An online petition, organised by the group 5Pillars and signed by over 100,000 people, says the film directly disrespects Prophet Muhammad [which is] deeply shocking and disrespectful to the best of creation. The petition adds that it is also a deeply racist film.

In a nominally free, democratic and tolerant society like ours, being offended by a film should never be a justification for its censorship or cancellation. But as weve seen all too often recently, freedom and tolerance are all too often trumped by a supposed right not to be offended. Our institutions are quick to cave in to intolerant mobs whenever they claim that their feelings have been hurt by this or that film or artwork. Those who have been protesting against The Lady of Heaven, in places like Bradford, Sheffield and Bolton, know this. In one video posted online, a protester at a Cineworld in Bradford can be seen declaring, We have a right not to be insulted.

Tragically, these tactics work. The manager of a Sheffield branch of Cineworld not only unilaterally cancelled The Lady of Heaven he also apologised to a crowd of protesters, telling them that it wasnt our decision to show this film, it came from above. We totally agree with what youre saying and were not prepared at this cinema to show this film. This was met with shouts of Allahu Akbar.

The illiberalism of the protesters is shocking and ought to worry anyone concerned about freedom of speech today. Yet just as worrying is the deafening silence from our cultural and political elites. Cinemas are cancelling a film because a section of society claims it is offensive, and politicians, for the most part, are saying nothing.

Given that even in Europe challenging Islamist intolerance can sometimes lead to people being intimidated, attacked and sometimes murdered, ordinary peoples fear of criticising religious fanaticism is perhaps understandable. But the cowardice of our cultural and political leaders in the face of this Islamist intolerance is not. Their unwillingness to stand up for freedom of expression and tolerance is shameful and it is empowering the fanatics.

Part of the problem here is that our political and cultural elites are so beholden to the politics of identity and victimhood that they actually think the Muslim protesters have a point. They seem to think that being offended really is sufficient grounds for the cancellation of a film. After all, as they see it, why shouldnt Muslims be protected from offence? Why shouldnt they be spared the trauma of criticism?

This elite self-flagellation and cowardice is empowering intolerant mobs. It empowered the Islamists who protested outside Batley Grammar School last year, after a teacher showed a cartoon of Muhammad as part of a lesson on free speech and blasphemy. And it is empowering those now protesting outside cinemas because The Lady of Heaven features a CGI Muhammad.

This is a deeply troubling moment for freedom of speech and tolerance in Britain. If our cultural and political leaders cannot be bothered to stand up for these fundamental values, then it is all too likely they will wither away. We cant let this happen.

Inaya Folarin Iman is a GB News presenter and founder of the Equiano Project.

To enquire about republishing spikeds content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Link:
The shameful censorship of The Lady of Heaven - spiked - Spiked

Cherry Network Empowering Creativity, Freedom, and Decentralization with Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts and User-Friendly Content Creation Tools -…

Originally posted here.By: NewsBTC

Only with the right tech, tools, and infrastructure can we usher in the Web3-based decentralized future the world needs. Cherry Network was built to do just that. Heres how. From Centralization to Decentralization via Blockchain The concepts of distributed ledger technology (DLT) and transparent, auditable transactions secured in a blockchain have been revolutionary for multiple reasons. First, they raised the bar in terms of what was possible in the provision of massively scaled online apps and services. Why should end users be restricted by the rules and limits of centralized apps and platforms instead of everyone participating on equal terms? Blockchain-based decentralization offers a way around this, and helps give the power back to the user. Second, this changing of the guard and the removal of centralized gatekeepers has opened new frontiers of value for innovations and ideas targeted at the billions of global users who have grown weary of the restrictions, unfettered clout, and unilateral censorship power of centralized tech powerhouses. Because of these developments, it is no wonder that blockchain-based apps and services have taken the world by storm. We now have successful crypto and blockchain projects operating in every field from healthcare, finance, and entertainment to governance, education, transportation, and more. From Web2 to Web3 Blockchains early days took place in Web2, which was largely dominated by large, centralized apps and platforms. Think of Apples App Store, Googles Play Store, YouTube, Facebook, and other centralized platforms that boast billions of users but are controlled by centralized entities. With the growth of the decentralized, user-focused Web3, however, things are changing rapidly. We now have decentralized apps and solutions that run on trustless, transparent, and censor-proof smart contracts connecting with decentralized file storage replacing centralized Web2 apps running on centralized servers. This is a monumental paradigm shift that, although occurring slowly, is the inevitable endgame for Web2 apps and services. Once Web3 gains critical mass and all the worlds leading brands, apps, and services migrate to decentralized infrastructures, having the right network backbone and the right tools, incentives, and support services in place will be critical to value creation, profitability, and success Enter Cherry Network Cherry Network is a layer-1 blockchain infrastructure that bridges smart contracts to decentralized file systems. Using the infallible if-else logic of smart contracts, integrating services built on that logic with decentralized data storage, and building an ecosystem of secure, transparent, low-cost, and high-performance products, services, and solutions, Cherry Network is revolutionizing the very concept of blockchain-based decentralized app development. Some of the key features of the platform include complete user and developer privacy, decentralized storage of data, and seamless payments integrations, as well as on-chain staking, full EVM compatibility, and zero-knowledge rollups (off-chain processing of transactions that are rolled up and brought on-chain in a single transaction, reducing cost, congestion, and time). With on-chain throughput of around 20,000 TPS, multiple wallet integrations, high-level partnerships, and a bevy of development activity within the ecosystem, Cherry Network should quickly become a vital component in the landscape of Web3-native decentralized applications. Development Team Cherry boasts a core team with over a decade of experience in the cryptocurrency space. The team is led by Herman Jacobs, CEO of Cherry Labs, an incubator focused solely on the Cherry ecosystem, who is responsible for overseeing the technical and business side of the network. Partners and Projects Cherry Network has several partnerships in place with some of the most high-profile investment firms in the industry. These include Luben Capital and Shima Capital. There are also many exciting projects being built out on the platform, including Seedling.cm, which is a high-growth investment launchpad for retail investing at the VC level, Cherish.cx, a complete content platform for artists and creators that is fully decentralized and free of censorship, and Unigate.finance, which is a decentralized protocol for payments and crypto services. Cherry and the Future As the world converges on a decentralized Web3 future for the internet, we expect to see an influx of projects, talent, and capital entering this space. Cherry is positioned as an innovative and forward-thinking crypto project that espouses all of the key principles of blockchain and decentralization, like transparency, solving real-world problems, and creating value. In shunning meme-coin and moon-coin marketing, not focusing on price but on value, and building tools and solutions that work for everyone, Cherry will be at the forefront of the next tech revolution. Over the next few days and weeks, Cherry will announce a new high-level partnership, and the network mainnet will be launched between June 12 and 14, 2022. Staking will go live one week later, and within the next few weeks dozens of projects will be using the Cherry Chain as a host of developer tools and resources are built out for the ecosystem.. Interested in learning more? Visit https://www.cherry.network/.

Only with the right tech, tools, and infrastructure can we usher in the Web3-based decentralized future the world needs. Cherry Network was built to do just that. Heres how.

From Centralization to Decentralization via Blockchain

The concepts of distributed ledger technology (DLT) and transparent, auditable transactions secured in a blockchain have been revolutionary for multiple reasons. First, they raised the bar in terms of what was possible in the provision of massively scaled online apps and services. Why should end users be restricted by the rules and limits of centralized apps and platforms instead of everyone participating on equal terms? Blockchain-based decentralization offers a way around this, and helps give the power back to the user. Second, this changing of the guard and the removal of centralized gatekeepers has opened new frontiers of value for innovations and ideas targeted at the billions of global users who have grown weary of the restrictions, unfettered clout, and unilateral censorship power of centralized tech powerhouses.

Because of these developments, it is no wonder that blockchain-based apps and services have taken the world by storm. We now have successful crypto and blockchain projects operating in every field from healthcare, finance, and entertainment to governance, education, transportation, and more.

From Web2 to Web3

Blockchains early days took place in Web2, which was largely dominated by large, centralized apps and platforms. Think of Apples App Store, Googles Play Store, YouTube, Facebook, and other centralized platforms that boast billions of users but are controlled by centralized entities. With the growth of the decentralized, user-focused Web3, however, things are changing rapidly. We now have decentralized apps and solutions that run on trustless, transparent, and censor-proof smart contracts connecting with decentralized file storage replacing centralized Web2 apps running on centralized servers.

This is a monumental paradigm shift that, although occurring slowly, is the inevitable endgame for Web2 apps and services. Once Web3 gains critical mass and all the worlds leading brands, apps, and services migrate to decentralized infrastructures, having the right network backbone and the right tools, incentives, and support services in place will be critical to value creation, profitability, and success Enter Cherry Network

Cherry Network is a layer-1 blockchain infrastructure that bridges smart contracts to decentralized file systems. Using the infallible if-else logic of smart contracts, integrating services built on that logic with decentralized data storage, and building an ecosystem of secure, transparent, low-cost, and high-performance products, services, and solutions, Cherry Network is revolutionizing the very concept of blockchain-based decentralized app development.

Some of the key features of the platform include complete user and developer privacy, decentralized storage of data, and seamless payments integrations, as well as on-chain staking, full EVM compatibility, and zero-knowledge rollups (off-chain processing of transactions that are rolled up and brought on-chain in a single transaction, reducing cost, congestion, and time). With on-chain throughput of around 20,000 TPS, multiple wallet integrations, high-level partnerships, and a bevy of development activity within the ecosystem, Cherry Network should quickly become a vital component in the landscape of Web3-native decentralized applications.

Development Team

Cherry boasts a core team with over a decade of experience in the cryptocurrency space. The team is led by Herman Jacobs, CEO of Cherry Labs, an incubator focused solely on the Cherry ecosystem, who is responsible for overseeing the technical and business side of the network.

Partners and Projects

Cherry Network has several partnerships in place with some of the most high-profile investment firms in the industry. These include Luben Capital and Shima Capital. There are also many exciting projects being built out on the platform, including Seedling.cm, which is a high-growth investment launchpad for retail investing at the VC level, Cherish.cx, a complete content platform for artists and creators that is fully decentralized and free of censorship, and Unigate.finance, which is a decentralized protocol for payments and crypto services.

Cherry and the Future

As the world converges on a decentralized Web3 future for the internet, we expect to see an influx of projects, talent, and capital entering this space. Cherry is positioned as an innovative and forward-thinking crypto project that espouses all of the key principles of blockchain and decentralization, like transparency, solving real-world problems, and creating value. In shunning meme-coin and moon-coin marketing, not focusing on price but on value, and building tools and solutions that work for everyone, Cherry will be at the forefront of the next tech revolution.

Over the next few days and weeks, Cherry will announce a new high-level partnership, and the network mainnet will be launched between June 12 and 14, 2022. Staking will go live one week later, and within the next few weeks dozens of projects will be using the Cherry Chain as a host of developer tools and resources are built out for the ecosystem..

Interested in learning more? Visit https://www.cherry.network/.

Read more:
Cherry Network Empowering Creativity, Freedom, and Decentralization with Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts and User-Friendly Content Creation Tools -...

Twitter censors Libs of TikTok, labels their tweets showing kids at drag shows ‘abuse and harassment’ – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Social media sensation Libs of TikTok was locked out of its Twitter account on Wednesday for a tweet about kids at drag shows that was deemed to be "abuse and harassment."

Only after losing an appeal and deleting the offending tweet was Libs of TikTok allowed to tweet again. "Twitter thinks its abuse to document drag shows. I think its abuse for drag shows to be taking place in front of kids," Libs of TikTok wrote in an update on their Substack about the ordeal, which included the news that the tweet was banned in Germany.

On Wednesday night Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon reported, "BREAKING: Twitter just locked out @libsoftiktok for posting a thread about several recent drag shows for kids. The thread allegedly violates Twitter's rules against abuse and harassment. You know what's actually abusive? Drag shows for kids."

According to screenshots, the specific tweet flagged by Twitter read, "~MEGA DRAG THREAD~ They say its innocent. They say its just about inclusion and acceptance. They say no one is trying to confuse, corrupt, or sexualize kids. They lie." It was originally posted on May 30.

CHICAGO SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST: GUNS HARM CHILDREN MORE THAN CHILD PORNAGRAPHY, SO LETS RESTRICT THEM

The Libs of TikTok account, which shares videos of left-wing individuals openly expressing their social and political views, was locked out of Twitter. (Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

"You can promote drag shows for kids on Twitter. That's fine. You can even share videos of yourself performing in them. The only thing you can't do is criticize them," Dillon tweeted. "Somehow the feelings of a few drag queens matter more to Twitter than the corruption of a generation of children."

In an update on Thursday morning, Dillon also announced that Twitter denied Libs of TikToks appeal to overturn the violation.

"Twitter has denied Libs of TikTok's appeal," Dillon tweeted with an image reading that Twitter determined "a violation did take place" of their "rules against abusive behavior" with the tweet.

Libs of TikTok tweeted later on Thursday afternoon, confirming that the account was reopened. The offending tweet has been replaced with the message "This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules. Learn more."

"Im back! Apparently posting videos and flyers of drag events is abusive but the actual events are just innocent family friendly entertainment," the accounted tweeted.

Dillon previously reported shortly after Libs of TikToks original tweet in May that the account was banned from participating in Twitter ads, though the notification did not specify the reason.

Twitter app displayed on an iPhone screen in New York. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

SCHOOLS, ORGANIZATIONS CELEBRATE PRIDE MONTH WITH DRAG SHOWS FOR MINORS

"Libs of TikTok has been banned from running ads on Twitter. A notification of ineligibility was sent out that failed to offer a specific reason," Dillon tweeted at the time.

In May, Libs of TikTok was also suspended from Instagram over the claim that the account violated the platforms Community Guidelines but it was not specified how. Instagram later restored the account over twelve hours later claiming that Libs of TikTok was "disabled by mistake."

The Libs of TikTok account usually shares videos of left-wing individuals openly expressing their social and political views on social media. It has been suspended from Twitter twice so far, once only hours it had been reinstated.

The TikTok logo is seen on an iPhone. (Photo by Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Both Twitter and Dillon did not immediately respond to Fox News requests for comments.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The recent moves by Twitter follow years of conservative users complaining that social media is attempting to censor their views. Dillons own company Babylon Bee was locked out its Twitter account back in March.

Lindsay Kornick is an associate editor for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to lindsay.kornick@fox.com and on Twitter: @lmkornick.

See the original post:
Twitter censors Libs of TikTok, labels their tweets showing kids at drag shows 'abuse and harassment' - Fox News

Uzbekistan’s Journalists: ‘Censorship in Our Minds and Hearts’ – The Diplomat

Advertisement

This is part two of a two-part investigation into the SSSs increasing repression of Uzbekistans journalists. Part one is available here.

TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN: An 11-week investigation into freedom of the press in Uzbekistan found that one of the biggest challenges journalists and bloggers face is pressure from the State Security Services (SSS). Journalists and bloggers say the SSS threatens and intimidates them and their families, and compels them to delete stories. The SSS demands that journalists and bloggers stop covering certain topics, such as high-level corruption within the government, the dealings of wealthy businessmen, religious practices, or anything vaguely disrespectful to the president or his family.

The investigation was blessed by the government of Uzbekistan which welcomed me as an American journalist and U.S. Fulbright Scholar a research grant from the U.S. State Department to research challenges journalists in this country face in reporting about corruption and government malfeasance. From March to June, I interviewed more than 40 journalists, bloggers, human rights activists, media watchers and government media monitors. I had previously interviewed nearly 100 journalists about obstacles to press freedoms in eight other post-Soviet countries.

Journalists in other post-Soviet countries face problems with intimidation, police overreach, court citations, fines, arrests and blocked websites. For example, in Belarus, the KGB openly films protesters and makes no secret of following journalists. But here, the SSS operates mostly in the shadows. Their threats and intimidations stifle journalists from reporting about corruption and problems that the newly elected president says he needs to know about to make reforms. The result is a media that is timid and self-censoring, a populace that is afraid to speak out, and a country that promotes the faade of a free press when in reality it is a country in the grip of propaganda.

Get briefed on the story of the week, and developing stories to watch across the Asia-Pacific.

Despite repeated requests, the SSS refused to meet with me in the course of reporting this story.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Rost 24 Threatened

Rost 24 editor, Anora Sodikova, announced on April 14 that she and her colleagues had been threatened with harm if she didnt delete a story and video about Uzbekistan businessman Jakhongir Usmanov. His name came to Sodikovas attention in the big data leak known as the Pandora Papers, which listed him as an owner of an offshore company, according to the story. Sodikovas report also linked Usmanov to a charity fund that allegedly channeled large sums of money through this offshore account.

Sodikova refused to say publicly who was threatening her, even to Ezgulik, Uzbekistans only independent registered human rights organization, which is backing her. But she told me: It was the SSS who made the threats.

Anora Sodikova started her own media platform, Rost 24, a year-and-a-half ago after she was fired from a state-run news agency for posting a story on Facebook about residents reactions to a dam collapsing. Photo provided by the author.

If I say it was the security forces, there will be a problem, she said. Besides, how can I prove it?

At the same time Sodikovas colleague received threatening phone calls, a sniper blogger began a smear campaign against her on social media alleging she was having an affair.

This sniper blogger said the next time he would show pictures, she said. Just like they did with Feruza.

Last year a female journalist from Qalampir.uz, Feruza Najmiddinova, was the target of a smear campaign when someone spread a video of a woman having sex with a man on a balcony. The anonymous poster said it was Najmiddinova having sex with a man who wasnt her husband. Since then, Sodikova, a Muslim, has feared the SSS would use this tactic to ruin her reputation.

This was the third time the SSS had pressured Sodikova to take down a story. The first time she ignored the threats. The second time, in May 2020, an SSS officer called her husband, she said. That time she took down the article.

After the second SSS encounter, Sodikovas husband separated from her for six months because he said he was afraid for their childrens safety.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

My husband said to me, If you want to live with me, if you want to keep our family safe, if you love me and our children, you should give up your job. I told him I love my family and my friends. I cant give up my job. I like my job also.

She and her husband reunited in October 2020. Recently her oldest son Googled her name and asked: Mom, are you really in danger?

I told him Im okay.

But later Sodikova learned that the Uzbekistan Creative Union for Journalists had gotten involved in her case.

As the head of the union, I cant skip this case, said Olimjon Usarov, who until a year ago was the government spokesperson for the Uzbek Supreme Court. I asked the prosecutor to investigate the case. To threaten a journalist is unlawful and criminal. If that person actually exists who threatened her, he will be found.

Usarov said the police pulled phone records from her phone and her colleagues phones. They pulled surveillance videos near her home and office trying to find the man who came up to her in a restaurant and told her to take down her story. Police asked to speak with her husband.

Anora asked us to take back the case, Usarov said. That was interesting for me.

Sodikova did not welcome the unions involvement. Instead, she worried that the government was trying to set her up. That is why she asked them to stop the investigation. She said she also fired her reporters at Rost 24 because she suspected they might be working with the SSS.

They are trying to say that I did this for PR for my media company, Sodikova said.

A high-level media official close to the investigation who asked that his name be withheld told me he thought Anora made up this story.

The investigation showed that there were no records of such people and no calls, he said. There were no threats. We are actually wondering why this happened and why Anora claimed this and what was behind all this.

The high-level media official said that a public announcement and press conference about the results of the investigation would happen soon.

Mad Dogs

President Shavkat Mirziyoyevs disdain for the SSS is well known. He has called them mad dogs and unscrupulous people in uniform. He has said he doesnt trust any security official and would rip off their epaulets if I have to. In February 2018, Mirziyoyev said he had received evidence of the torture of two local businessmen in SSS custody in the Bukhara region and promised that the officers would be held accountable.

What the president was talking about was the torture of Dilfuza Ibodovas two brothers, Ilhom and Rahim Ibodov, while in SSS custody in 2015. Ilhom was beaten to death by SSS officers and other prisoners. Rahim was sentenced to eight years in prison. Even while Dilfuza and her mother were writing letters begging government officials to investigate her brothers case, the SSS threatened her not to discuss the case.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Dilfuza Ibdova is a blogger and owner of the website tezkor-yangiliklar.uz in Bukhara. She investigates those who say they were wrongly charged or convicted. She says the SSS do not bother her because several went to prison after they severely beat and tortured her two brothers, killing one. Photo provided by author.

But Dilfuza didnt back down.

I was not afraid of anything because I had nothing to lose, she said.

When the president personally took an interest in the Ibodov case, the perpetrators were brought to justice: six officers and four prisoners were sentenced to prison for up to 18 years; two other officers were found guilty of exceeding their authority, according to the U.S. government and human rights reports. The court proceedings were closed and the decisions were not made publicly available.

Feeling she had the personal protection of the president, Dilfuza, a former kindergarten teacher with no training in journalism, started blogging. In 2020, she registered her media platform with the Agency for Information and Mass Communications, the governments media monitor. She is the sole reporter. She reports on news, current events and, for a fee, she investigates criminal cases to determine if the charged are guilty. She said shes not afraid to write about government officials.

The state security forces are afraid of me, she told me. What do you expect when eight of them went to prison? I can write about anything.

But Dilfuza is one of the few bloggers and journalists who feel this way.

Shuhrat Shokirjonov is the bureau chief of Kun.uz in Samarkand and has 14,000 followers on Twitter. Photo provided by author.

Shuhrat Shokirjonov is the bureau chief for Kun.uzs Samarkand office. He also blogs on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok. On his social media accounts, he mostly posts his opinions about various social issues and then embeds links to his factual stories on Kun.uz.

Occasionally, he says, the SSS contacts him and tells him to delete material. Two years ago, on May 9 what used to be called Victory Day and now is called Memory Day he criticized the government for having a parade. He said the SSS told him to delete the story. They said that criticizing the parade caused misunderstanding between post-Soviet countries. I didnt change my mind, but I deleted.

Shikirjonov avoids writing about the SSS because he knows he will face pressure if he does. Otherwise, he feels mostly free to criticize the government because he always has a reason and provides proof. Still, he says, I am afraid to be blamed for no reason by the security services. He is afraid that free expression in the media can be taken away, just like in Russia when President Vladimir Putin suddenly outlawed all media dissent about the war in Ukraine.

Another blogger from Samarkand said he recently moved to Tashkent in part because of the SSS and police surveillance in his hometown. At the beginning of the war, Farukh Turamurodov, who goes by the name Samarkandi online, said he posted on his Facebook page a picture of a car with the symbol Z on its back window. The symbol has become one of support for Russia in its war in Ukraine.

Farukh Turamurodov goes by the name Samarkandi online where he blogs in his spare time about social issues. He said he recently moved from Samarkand to Tashkent because of police and SSS intimidation. Photo provided by author.

An hour later, the SSS contacted him and asked him to delete it.

In 2020, the SSS told him he shouldnt criticize higher class workers, such as government officials, the president and his family, police and the SSS.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

He wrote a post that didnt name the president but referred to him as the the man wearing the black suit. The SSS contacted him and told him to take it down because it wasnt respectful.

Then last November he complained online about a government app that wasnt working and he was summoned to the police station. He later learned that two other bloggers were also summoned the same day. It was then that he decided to leave Samarkand.

Bloggers in other regions of Uzbekistan report that they are followed and frequently questioned by the SSS. When I traveled to the Fergana region, the journalists I interviewed and the manager of the hotel where I stayed were contacted by the SSS and asked questions about what I did, where I went, and who I spoke with.

Pressure from the security services has only gotten worse over time, explains Bahodirxon Eliboyev, a journalist-turned-blogger in the Fergana region. Government spying and monitoring has had a chilling effect on both journalists and citizens, he said.

The security services can buy some journalists, Eliboyev said. If the authorities order, journalists write everything that officials want. Thats not journalism. Thats propaganda. Censorship is now in our minds and our hearts.

Bahodirxon Eliboyev runs a Telegram channel blog from Fergana called Ma-News Agency. He was formerly fired from two journalism jobs for writing about controversial topics. He started two magazines but they were also shut down for coverage of controversial topics.

On July 24, 2018, Mirziyoyevs birthday, Eliboyev said he wrote a blog post wishing the president a happy birthday and asked him not to forget the millions of Uzbek migrant workers in Russia and other countries because they cant make a living in their home country.

That afternoon four SSS officers pounded on the door of his garage apartment where he was napping, he said.When they saw I was living out of a garage, they asked; Dont you have a home? He said he told them: I cant work as a journalist. So where can I live? I cant earn money at the one thing Im good at.

They warned him he would go to jail if he kept writing about forbidden topics.

He told them: I can write whatever I want because your jail is like my garage. But your jail is more comfortable because I dont need to find bread. You bring me bread. Your jail is for me freedom. Two hours after our interview, Eliboyev sent me a text. Hed just gotten off the phone with the SSS. They wanted to know what he told me, he said.

First-hand Experience With the Censors

When I came to Tashkent in March, I met with various editors and owners of independent newspapers, including Kamariddin Shaykhov, part owner of the Qalampir.uz media platform where the walls are covered with photos and illustrations of human rights issues, such as domestic violence and government repression. Shaykhov said his media outlet routinely receives letters and warnings from the Agency for Information and Mass Communications telling them to either take a story down or to remove comments on stories.

Once we get a letter from the Agency, for the next two to three hours, our articles are under three to four times more self-censorship, he said. Psychologically it takes a few hours before we are logically thinking. You must fight self-censorship or leave with bruises.

Kamariddin Shaykhov standing before one of the walls in Qalampir depicting Uzbekistani journalists from history.Photo provided by author.

After our meeting, I thought it would be insightful to write for an independent media outlet and see what happened, especially one that was fighting for freedom of speech, as Shaykhov professed. I proposed writing a weekly guest column for Qalampir about my interviews with Uzbekistani journalists. Shaykhov agreed since the government had approved my research.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

But when I turned in my second column about SSS pressure faced by journalists, including myself, in the Fergana Valley, I was summoned to the Qalampir offices and told that they couldnt run a story about the SSS. Shaykhov and his silent business partnerwhose famous singer wife, according to documents, owns 75 percent of Qalampirdefended the actions of the SSS for two hours. How do you know the security services officers werent just trying to protect you? How do you know their motives were bad? both men asked.

It was the last I heard from Qalampir.

In an attempt to be fair, I repeatedly requested an interview with the SSS. I sent letters to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Agency.

Dilshod Saidjonov, from the Agency, characterized my request as nave.

They are so secret they dont even have a website, he said. Even if you got an interview with the security services, there would still be the same problems in Uzbekistans media: no will to improve; weak education; and lack of analytical skills.

Still, I persevered. I asked journalists who knew SSS officers to request an interview for me. I even wrote a blog post on my website about my quest for an interview with the SSS, had it translated into Uzbek, and had several bloggers targeted by the SSS to post it on their blogs. I still did not hear back.

Link:
Uzbekistan's Journalists: 'Censorship in Our Minds and Hearts' - The Diplomat