Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Leatherface’s outfit comedically censors Sub-Zero’s Fatality in Mortal Kombat X to make it PG-13 instead of rated R – EventHubs

Though Mortal Kombat 11 is still going strong with the next update to Ultimate bringing with it Rain, Rambo and Mileena coming in less than a month, it's still fun to go back to its predecessor for a good time or two and maybe even some bugs.

During a recent Mortal Kombat X stream match between Smash|PNDKetchup and Smash|PNDMustard, some unexpected censorship pops up at the perfect moment in Sub-Zero's Fatality thanks to Leatherface's iconic attire.

After taking the game, Mustard has his Sub-Zero go for the ice spike stomp Fatality, but the most gruesome parts end up getting completely obscured thanks to some glitchy cloth physics.

Leatherface's apron hilariously flips upwards to cover up his entire upper body and head, so we only see some pointy pieces of ice jutting out through the piece of fabric instead of his face and chest.

The pair then dub the funny glitch a YouTube-friendly Fatality considering the video platform has long demonetized Mortal Kombat videos for their violent content and bloody finishers.

You can check out the fun MKX clip below though you can still see a loose eye ball sticking out at one point before full inadvertent censor.

Click image for full version

View post:
Leatherface's outfit comedically censors Sub-Zero's Fatality in Mortal Kombat X to make it PG-13 instead of rated R - EventHubs

Social media censorship threatens to widen rift in U.S. – Boston Herald

This week, social media giants Twitter and Facebook proved that their monopolistic malpractice is a big problem for politics and culture in America.

When the New York Post published a story about suspicious emails that had been allegedly discovered between Hunter Biden and officials at the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, where he was paid tens of thousands of dollars a month to serve on the board, the revelations were remarkable.

In one alleged missive from 2015, a Burisma adviser named Vadym Pozharskyi thanked the vice presidents son for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent (sic) some time together. Its realty (sic) an honor and pleasure.

The Biden campaign has insisted that no such meeting was found to be on the official schedule, but they do not outright dispute the content of the emails or deny that an informal meeting could have occurred.

A year earlier, right after the younger Biden had been added to the companys board, Pozharskyi asked him for advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message/signal to put a stop to an investigation into the company. Later, Vice President Biden bragged he had been able to get the prosecutor fired.

The trove of correspondence was passed on to the Post by Rudy Giuliani who has been loudly trying to draw connections of corruption between interests in Ukraine and Joe Biden via his son, Hunter.

According the the New York Post, the emails were recovered from a computer that was dropped off at a Delaware repair shop and never retrieved. It is not known who dropped the machine off.

What makes all this most newsworthy is that Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee for president, has been denying that hed ever taken part in his sons business overseas or that he was even aware of what that business was.

These emails go directly to refuting that and suggest that Biden was used by his son for payment in exchange for influence.

Thus, the story ran and was distributed through social media until prominent, anti-Trump users demanded that it stop.

Kyle Griffin, an MSNBC producer with more than 900,000 followers tweeted, No one should link to or share that NY Post report. You can discuss the obvious flaws and unanswerable questions in the report without amplifying what appears to be disinformation.

Andy Stone, who works in the communications department at Facebook but has a long resume featuring jobs with various Democratic organizations was also containing the story. While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, Stone tweeted, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebooks third-party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform.

By the afternoon, Twitter started blocking sharing of the article in any form, warning users away from the link, and locking prominent accounts that shared it, including that of the New York Post itself, Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany and the Trump campaign account @teamtrump.

In doing so, they turned a shady October surprise leak that would have been ignored by many in the mainstream into a major story that is reverberating through the country. What, many Americans wonder, do these massive tech companies want so badly to hide from them?

The selective censorship by social media monopolies threatens to divide our nation to a degree we have never seen before.

More here:
Social media censorship threatens to widen rift in U.S. - Boston Herald

Milot’s Musings: Censor This | | dailyadvance.com – The Daily Advance

We have three major breaking stories for you tonight. Many news anchors start out their shows like this every night, but the stories do not usually all qualify as major.

But last week, major does not begin to characterize the stories that broke like giant waves crashing ashore one after the other.

The confirmation hearings of Amy Coney Barrett soaked up most of the air time for three days and were truly newsworthy, but then the New York Post broke a sensational front page news story that said emails had been found on a Hunter Biden computer hard drive that could destroy Joe Bidens candidacy.

This was like one of those monster Bonzai Pipeline waves at a surfing competition on the north shore of Oahu.

These and subsequent emails posited Hunter Biden connections with foreign parties in Ukraine, Russia, and China that resulted in enrichment of the Biden family, including the former Vice-President.

Louisiana Senator John Kennedy characterized this as a message to the world that the United States of America can be bought like a sack of potatoes. In his usually colorful language, Kennedy said these accusations are as serious as four heart attacks and a stroke.

As explosive as this story was, it was met with total silence in the establishment media. Worse, links to it were blocked by Facebook and Twitter. Overnight, the venality of the Bidens was no longer the big story: censorship was.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey quickly apologized for blocking the Post story, but hes going to have to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to explain his companys blackout of a story damaging to Bidens campaign.

There is no acceptable explanation. The fact is that social media monopolies are in the tank for the Democrats and will justify any perverse action to help them gain power. We are accustomed to the lying, cheating, and dirty tricks that have earned politicians the lowest trustworthy rankings among all segments of our society. But censorship of a story in the press is more than that. It is a direct and corrosive attack on our democracy.

This is especially true in this case because we are in the midst of a presidential election. When Twitter censored the New York Post story, it effectively cut off a popular source of news for millions of voters on the day they went to the polls. It may or may not have an effect on the outcome of this election.

But the point is that Twitters censorship of a story as serious as four heart attacks and a stroke was perniciously partisan and should be condemned by everyone, even any of the yet silent media.

The New York Post is a conservative newspaper. Within recognized legal limits, it is entitled to the fundamental right of press freedom spelled out so clearly in the First Amendment to the Constitution, just as its rivals at the liberal New York Times and Washington Post are entitled to it. Twitter violated that right.

Our Founding Fathers recognized that the exchange of ideas, even contrarious ones, is essential in a free society, and that the freedom to express these ideas in the press must be protected.

They would be appalled, and saddened, at the sight of social media giants willingness to crack a fundamental pillar of our democracy to achieve their partisan goals.

Claude Milot of Hertford worked in the publishing business for 33 years.

Excerpt from:
Milot's Musings: Censor This | | dailyadvance.com - The Daily Advance

Oh, Frak Avoiding the Censors the SFF Way – tor.com

Every culture has its own set of taboos surrounding bodily functions, religion, and naming things. In Anglophone cultures, our taboos generally involve waste excretion, particular body parts, sexual acts, and Christian deities. But we can still talk about these things (with varying degrees of comfort) by replacing them with non-taboo words, or we can soften them to non-taboo forms by changing something about the word itself. This column will unavoidably include cusswords, though I will try to keep them to a minimum

Taboo words in English have non-taboo counterparts and, in many cases, elevated/clinical terms as well. (As a native US-English speaker, Im focusing on that variety, but Ill mention some British as well.) Take, for example, the word feces. Its a dry, clinical, neutral term for solid bodily waste. We also have crap, less clinical, slightly vulgar but still allowed on TV, poo or poop and all its variants, a childhood word, and the delightful, vulgar Germanic word shit. Each of these words has situations where its appropriate and inappropriate, and they all indicate something about the person using them (and the situation theyre in).

Medical records will use feces (or possibly stool, excrement, or excreta) but none of the others; when people step in dog feces on the street, they dont refer to it as dog feces, but use one of the other words, like dog crap, dog poo, doggy doo-doo, dog turds, or dog shit. Some of these things are more okay to say in front of a child than others, and one of them is too vulgar for broadcast TV.

When used as an exclamation or interjection, we dont use feces, turd, or doo-doo; these are strongly tied to the object. Instead, well say crap, shit, or poop, depending on our personal preferences and whos around us at the time. I try really hard to avoid cussing in front of my five-year-old niece, because shes a sponge for that sort of thing, and we dont need her to go to school sounding like a sailor.

We can also say shoot or sugar or something similar, where you can still recognize the vulgarity, but its been changed. When I was a young 3dgy teen, my mom would give me this Look and say, its gosh darn it. She still doesnt like me cussing, but Im 44 now, and here I am, writing about swear words.

Reading Shakespeare as a teen, I saw all these zounds! and the like, and had no idea what it meant, but, based on context, I could tell it was some sort of swear. I pronounced it rhyming with sounds, because thats what it looked like, but I later learned it was derived from Gods woundsand thus a blasphemous swear. Bloody also stems from religion: Gods blood. Jiminy cricket is also a deformation of a blasphemous swear, as are gee, geez/jeez, and a whole plethora of words.

As language users, we thus have a few tricks in our bag for how to avoid taboos, and we use them all the time. In many cases, we use avoidance words without even knowing that theyre avoiding something!

When script writers had to avoid bad words because of FCC broadcast rules, they could take a variety of tacks, just like we do every day. You get lots of oh, geez and shoot or freaking in your contemporary (and historical) fare, but in SFF-land, writers have another trick up their sleeves: alien languages, or even made-up future-English words. Thats where our fraks and frells come in (via Battlestar Galactica and Farscape, respectively). Sometimes you get other inventive ways of evading the censors, like Joss Whedon did with Firefly and having people cuss in Chinese.

Of course, now, with the rise of Netflix and Prime originals, people can swear to their hearts content. In the Expanse books, Chrisjen Avasarala uses fuck freely and creatively. In the SyFy seasons, she doesnt swear much, but once the show switched over to Amazon Prime, she now gets to use her favorite word almost as much as in the books. Its delightful to see this respectable grandmother and politician with a gravelly voice talking like a sailor, and I love it.

Of course, evading the censors isnt the only reason to deform taboo words. Some authors use invented swears as worldbuilding or because they arent as potty-mouthed as I am.

In his book The Widening Gyre, Michael R. Johnston has the main character comment that Kelvak, one of the non-human languages, is his favorite to curse in, because theres nothing as satisfying as the harsh consonants in the word skalk.

Theres something to that statement. The two most common vulgarities, shit and fuck, are characterized by a fricative at the word onset and a plosive as the coda. A successful deformation of these wordsone that leaves the speaker satisfiedfollows that pattern. Deformations that are closer to the original are also more satisfying. Shoot is more satisfying than sugar; frak is more satisfying (to me) than frell. Judas priest is more satisfying (and blasphemous) than jiminy cricket. The Kelvak word skalk starts with a fricative (albeit in a cluster) and ends with a plosive, so it feels sweary.

You could theorize that theres some sort of sound-symbolic connection with the fricative-vowel-plosive combination, where the plosive represents a closing or hitting, but that gets a bit Whorfian. We dont need psychological justification for it.

So: what are some of your favorite SFF swears and taboo deformations? Im partial to Bilairys balls! from Lynn Flewellings Nightrunner series, in which Bilairy is the god of the dead.

CD Covington has masters degrees in German and Linguistics, likes science fiction and roller derby, and misses having a cat. She is a graduate of Viable Paradise 17 and has published short stories in anthologies, most recently the story Debridement in Survivor, edited by Mary Anne Mohanraj and J.J. Pionke.

See more here:
Oh, Frak Avoiding the Censors the SFF Way - tor.com

800 and falling prey to crowd censorship – The New Indian Express

Tamil actor Vijay Sethupathis decision to opt out of 800, a biopic on Sri Lankan cricket player Muthiah Muralitharan, was not surprising, coming as it did in the aftermath of a week-long social media storm kicked up by the film and political fraternity. The actor put out a cryptic tweet on Monday, indicating that he is drawing stumps just when he was getting ready to spin a dream role. It came in response to a request from Muralitharan to step down and end the controversy.

The initial bouncer came from Tamil filmmaker Bharathiraja last week, when he asked the actor to junk the project, saying it was based on the life of the cricketer who had glorified the Tamil genocide in Sri Lanka in 2009.

Soon, more voices in the gallery lent support to this cry. Muralitharan, a Tamilian whose ancestors had gone to Sri Lanka as plantation workers during the 19th and early 20th centuries, is seen to be a supporter of MahindaRajapaksa, the prime minister of Sri Lanka, and his brother Gotabaya Rajapaksa, its current president. The plantation workers, referred to as estate Tamils, live in central Sri Lanka while the Jaffna Tamils or Eelam Tamils consider themselves descendants of the old Jaffna kingdom and mostly live in north and east Sri Lanka.

Though they are both Tamils, their caste dynamics and role in the political landscape are varied. Films as a medium of creative expression have now become frequent targets of crowd censorship. Trolling and hounding in social media has been dictating the narrative of art and the artists creative expression, and, unfortunately, been succeeding in its pursuit, the recent pulling down of a jewellery advertisement being a case in point.

The latest pressure on Sethupathi is no different, as it comes from chauvinists who claim to preserve native pride. The point being missed is that the biopic is on the sportsman, tracking his rise in becoming a world-class spinner who bagged a record 800 wickets in Test cricket, a feat that is yet to be matched. His journey involving hard work and determination would have been inspirational to the enthusiastic, cricket-crazy subcontinent. A final word to be noted is that Muralitharan is the mentor of IPLs Sunrisers Hyderabad team owned by the Sun Network, whose Kalanithi Maran is the grand-nephew of former CM M Karunanidhi.

Read more:
800 and falling prey to crowd censorship - The New Indian Express