Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Shilpa Gupta at the Barbican: social injustice, censorship and poetry – Wallpaper*

Shilpa Gupta at the Barbican: social injustice, censorship and poetry

In the multipart showSun at Night at Londons Barbican, Mumbai-based artist Shilpa Gupta highlights the fragility of free expression and gives a voice to those silenced

The words of Azerbaijani poet Mikayil Mushfig (1908 1938), labelled an enemy of the state by the Soviets, hover in the air. From a canopy of 100 low-hung microphones, a chorus clusters and repeats the poets statement. There is heavy breathing. Hums dissolve into whispers. Fingers click and hands furiously clap. An unpredictable rhapsody of disembodied voices darts around a dimly lit room, creating a dense fog of sounds that lingers over a field of metal spikes.

Once your senses adjust, you can edge through these spines that comprise Shilpa Guptas sound installation, For, In Your Tongue, I Cannot Fit (2017 2018). Rising up to waist height, the spears forge a constricted path. Each pierces a leaf of paper bearing fragments of the spoken verses, written by a poet incarcerated for their beliefs. It is a panoply of resistance spanning time and place, with the words of dissident writers such as Maung Saungkha from Myanmar, arrested in 2016 for his risqu claim that he had a tattoo of the president inked on his penis, melding with those of Ayat al-Qurmezi, jailed in 2011 for supposedly defaming Bahrains royalty.

The enveloping piece is part of Guptas poignant exhibition Sun at Night at the Barbican Curve. In a year when the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to two journalists, Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitry Muratov of Russia, for their courageous advocacy and practice of press freedom, and when digital censorship is alarmingly on the rise, the show is a testament to the force of words and the fragility of our commitment to free speech.

Gupta, however, finds a refreshingly subtle way of rallying for free expression while keeping those poets at the fore. She treats their words preciously. She has preserved the verses of censored poems by speaking them into a collection of ostensibly empty medicine bottles that form the piece Untitled (Spoken Poem in a Bottle).

The thresholds of expression have long preoccupied Gupta. She once built a library of stainless steel books, each a replica of a title written anonymously or pseudonymously. And on the spine she explained the reasons why, capturing a range of societys neuroses and prejudices. Guptas practice is characterised by its delicate investigation of social injustices and finding pathways to empathy. As she tells me, the objective of her work is speaking with you and not at you and not against you. It maybe has to do with a sense of hope that a conversation might mean something.

Come November 2021, Gupta will continue this dialogue with her first solo show at Londons Frith Street Gallery. There will be spillover from the Barbican show,she explains, drawing a link between the genre of isolation that has been enforced throughout the world this last year. She has created a new flap-board the kind typically associated with airport and train arrivals that flickers through letters and settles to find our connective tissue. It spells out We are closer than you ever imagined.

Go here to read the rest:
Shilpa Gupta at the Barbican: social injustice, censorship and poetry - Wallpaper*

Undercover Influencers Test the Patience of China’s Censors – Jing Daily

Key Takeaways:

Beijings ongoing crackdown on pretty much everything spurred by President Xi Jinpings highly publicized common prosperity campaign has brought about a new challenge for influencers hoping to maintain their online traffic as well as authorities on the lookout for those posting anything that smells of wealth-flaunting. With authorities on extra-sensitive mode, many if not most celebrities and influencers are lying low and resisting the urge to post photos of lavish outfits or handbags, yet others have sought to skirt the scrutiny of censors by shoehorning their high-end items into seemingly unassuming content.

As noted in our recent report Chinese Cultural Consumers: The Future of Luxury, Chinas influencer landscape is changing, with the formerly dominant Hollywood stars or established Chinese actors holding less sway over young consumers than livestreams by KOLs (key opinion leaders), KOCs (key opinion consumers), or even brand owners and employees. This means there are now dozens, if not hundreds, of types of influencers, all fighting for the attention of consumers and keeping online censors on their toes.

Below are just three recent examples of innovative influencers in China, whose crafty content strategies are testing the limits of the wealth-flaunting crackdown:

The Buddhist Socialite ()

Buddhist Socialites have attracted particular ire from censors, since commercial advertising using religion is illegal in China. Image: Weibo

Almost exclusively made up of young women, the appearance of the Buddhist Socialite influencer in recent months was marked by content that often showcased activities at Buddhist temples praying, eating vegetarian meals, or transcribing religious texts. All common practices, none of which are the target of Chinas content crackdown. However, where the Buddhist Socialite attracts the ire of censors is in her often prominently featured luxury apparel and accessories and elaborate makeup which they typically offer for sale via e-commerce livestreaming or other online channels.The Patient KOL ()

Patient KOLs often appear in hospital beds in full make-up. Image: Weibo

This highly niche group claims to be hospitalized for medical treatment yet manages to find the time to share recommendations for beauty and wellness products. Often, Patient KOLs tell their audience they have just undergone a procedure such as major surgery that left scars on their skin that they successfully treated with various products (which theyre happy to recommend or sell via e-commerce livestreaming, of course). One distinguishing factor about this type of influencer is that it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain whether he or she had a genuine illness or medical procedure.

In one case, a female Weibo user responded with lawsuit against media reports that named and shamed her as a Patient KOL, claiming that she had a thyroid procedure and did not promote any healthcare product for profit. Nevertheless, the fact that short video platform Kuaishou has reportedly removed more than 100 videos from Patient KOLs speaks to their prevalence.

The Volunteer Teacher KOL ()

Altruism or opportunism? Image: ce.cn

The latest secret influencer controversy surrounds the founder of a charity organization that organizes volunteer teachers to assist young students in remote, mountainous areas. Catapulted to internet fame by post in September that praised her as the prettiest volunteer teacher in China, who had helped over 2,000 students over ten years in 24 different schools, skepticism soon emerged. How, some asked, could the young lady volunteer for an entire decade, given she claimed to hold degrees from overseas institutions, and how was she able to maintain such an impeccable appearance on-camera without a professional photography team?

Soon, it was revealed that the individual only volunteered for short periods during her summer breaks, and that her organization charged around RMB 5,000 ($775) for volunteer trips that consisted of only seven classes in two days but offered volunteer certificates and multiple souvenirs. Some viewers were quick to saythat the trips expensive accommodation and the flashy apparel and accessories shown off by those taking part in the volunteer trips did more harm than good to the children they are supposed to help.

These new types of undercover influencers have emerged in response to the governments crackdowns on ostentatious displays of wealth. The most recent of these campaigns which do appear with some frequency launched in May, when the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) issued a series of policies designed to curb overt displays of extravagant lifestyles through measures such as blacklisting andcontentfiltering, which have been taken up by social platforms such as Douyin and Xiaohongshu.

By selecting themes that appear, at first glance, to be altruistic and far removed from the usual fashion-influencer content, this new spate of KOLs hoped to stay under the radar. However, Chinese state-run media quickly caught on and condemned their behavior. One state media op-ed accusedBuddhist Socialite influencers of stoking materialism while compromising the integrity of temples, while also noting thatcommercialadvertising using religion is illegal in China. Likewise, Patient KOLs have been criticized for corrupting the sacredness of hospitals and the healthcare profession and potentially engaging in fraudulent advertising. Another Xinhua Daily op-ed criticized the phenomenon of volunteer teaching for show and called for moral condemnation and legal action against exploiting volunteering opportunities to generate traffic and profit. For their parts, short video platform Douyin and lifestyle platform Xiaoghongshu have penalized dozens of accounts and removed their objectionablecontent.With Xis common prosperity becoming a central concept in recent government action, any public displays of wealth, whether obvious or subtle, are likely to come under greater scrutiny in the run-up to next years National Congress. But its not just government censors on the lookout for this type of content. Major social platforms are also stepping up their scrutiny of sneaky KOLs, having pledged to promote core socialist values. Although the KOLs who most recently came under fire were not directly sponsored by brands, their experiences offer a cautionary tale for luxury brands engaged in influencer marketing in China: simply switching to influencers previously not associated with excessive wealth might come along with its own problems if the crackdown continues to spread and intensify.

Continued here:
Undercover Influencers Test the Patience of China's Censors - Jing Daily

Questions of censorship raised as Dubai expo shows just top of David statue replica – The Globe and Mail

A 3D reproduction of Michelangelo's David is on display at Italy's pavilion of the Dubai Expo 2020, on Oct. 1.

Kamran Jebreili/The Associated Press

One of the most talked about attractions at the worlds fair under way in Dubai is a towering statue made of marble dust thats raising eyebrows just as the original did more than 500 years ago.

At Italys pavilion, a 3D replica of Michelangelos David stands tall, his gaze intense and defiant. For most visitors, though, Davids head is all they will see as they tour the pavilion. Only VIPs with special access will be able to catch a view of the statue from head to toe while its on display for the next six months at Dubais Expo 2020.

The original David is nude and some visitors see the limited view offered as a form of censorship. Others say the way David is displayed at the Expo is a form of artistic expression.

Story continues below advertisement

It is no coincidence that David is not seen from the bottom to the top, as it normally is, but it welcomes people by looking at them in the face, said David Rampello, the director of art at the Italian pavilion.

An art historian in Rome said choosing who can view the statue in full and who cannot creates a hierarchy.

What the rich, the great and the good can see and what the ordinary folk can see shouldnt be two different things, said Professor Paul Gwynne, who teaches medieval and renaissance studies at the American University of Rome.

It took a team of Italian experts 40 hours of digital scanning to create the replica, made with what organizers describe as one of the worlds largest 3D printers. Artists used filaments from recycled plastic material, then a mix of resins and marble dust to create it.

At its home in Florences Galleria dellAccademia since 1873, the original David draws gasps from onlookers to this day. Michelangelos mastery and his passion for human anatomy, from the contracted muscles of Davids abdomen to the flexing of his right thigh muscles, make the piece unforgettable for those looking up at the towering work of art.

In Dubai, those details get lost. David stands in the centre of a narrow octagonal shaft, presented from his chest up and surrounded by replicas of Roman columns. Visitors in the public area can see parts of Davids torso if they lean over a railing.

The rest of his body sits inside a clear partition on the separate floor. His genitals and buttocks find themselves between the floors, though fully visible if an onlooker stands near the partition and peers up.

Story continues below advertisement

That position drew the ire of a La Repubblica reporter writing on Expos opening.

Why cant you see the whole body of the biblical hero, because you only see the head, the magnetic eyes staring at you silently? And where is the rest? an article in the daily newspaper read, at one point referring to Davids beheading.

Davids nudity has been part of a centuries-old debate about art pushing boundaries and the rules of censorship. In the 1500s, metal fig leaves covered the genitals of statues like David when the Roman Catholic Church deemed nudity as immodest and obscene.

Nudity even bumps up against mores in the modern era. Controversy erupted in 2016 when officials erected wooden panels to shield nude statues at Romes Capitoline Museums during a visit by Irans then-President Hassan Rouhani. That spurred some politicians to accuse the government of caving in to cultural submission though Rouhani himself thanked Italians as being very hospitable people when asked about the gesture.

In the wider United Arab Emirates, a few nude artworks can be seen at the Louvre Abu Dhabi, though the museum largely caters to more conservative pieces.

Expo visitor Calli Schmitz from Germany she said she didnt think the way the replica was displayed at the Expo did it much justice.

Story continues below advertisement

I think it was not as exposed as it should have been, she said. I think because of the gold everywhere, people did not really realize it was the statue of David.

Italian visitor Ricardo Mantarano offered another take.

Its a different way of approaching the same sculpture and putting it in another perspective, he said.

Dinara Aksyanova, a 31-year-old visitor from Moscow, however, wasnt as forgiving.

Why was it only half? It makes no sense, she said. The most interesting part is underneath.

Sign up for The Globes arts and lifestyle newsletters for more news, columns and advice in your inbox.

Original post:
Questions of censorship raised as Dubai expo shows just top of David statue replica - The Globe and Mail

Could CHINA be exporting its CENSORSHIP to the rest of the WORLD? – VisualPolitik EN – The Global Herald – The Global Herald

VisualPolitik EN published this video item, entitled Could CHINA be exporting its CENSORSHIP to the rest of the WORLD? VisualPolitik EN below is their description.

Join the VisualPolitik community and support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/VisualPolitik

China is a country known for censorship, the Asian giant has managed to position itself and stand up to the West, showing that they can open up to the world and, at the same time, maintain their dictatorship.

China has more censorship than any other country, a result of their superior technology that allows them to develop a massive firewall to filter the information that the Chinese population sees. The worlds most popular social media platforms are banned in this country, because China uses its own social networks which are monitored by the government, thereby having total control of the flow of information.

These days we are hearing of cases where Western films and companies self-censor themselves in order to enter the expanding and attractive Chinese market.

But how does censorship work in China? Is censorship being exported to other countries? Do many Western companies really censor themselves in order to enter the Chinese market?

Join us in this video where we answer these questions.

And dont forget to visit our friends podcast, Reconsider Media:

https://www.reconsidermedia.com/

Got a comment? Leave your thoughts in the comments section, below. Please note comments are moderated before publication.

See more here:
Could CHINA be exporting its CENSORSHIP to the rest of the WORLD? - VisualPolitik EN - The Global Herald - The Global Herald

Freedom From Censorship: Inside The Battle To Build A Second Internet – The Federalist

It was just above freezing on Capitol Hill the night of Jan. 8, when Twitter banned President Donald Trump from messaging his nearly 90 million followers.

The censorship of a sitting American president by unaccountable and unelected billionaires in California was a dangerous escalation, but here in Washington, Democrats were overjoyed, most Republicans were relieved, and the corporate press was ecstatic. To even question the decision publicly in D.C. was to support an imagined insurrection.

That night, as friends and I discussed the damage done and the battles ahead around my kitchen bar, we foresaw a world where these kinds of sweeping actions would become common to the point of mundane, losing any fig leaf of justification along the way. As the hours wore on and the beer animated our discussion, one of our company, Martn Avila, sat aside and said little.

It was strange: Avila was a technologist who stayed in a guest room when he was in town. Hed been predicting this moment for years, but the night it happened he chose to retire with barely a word.

Early the next morning, I heard the engine start on his 94 Range Rover as he pulled the truck into the winter air. He was heading to North Carolina to meet with some old friends.

President Trump was far from the first to be banned by Twitter, but his permanent suspension marked the start of a long, dark night, when anyone anywhere might be banned for anything at the whim of a technocrat.

Wed seen warnings the sun was setting on a free internet: Mozilla Firefox President and cofounder Brendan Eich was fired over his Christian religion in 2014; Google worked openly to demonetize content it didnt like in 2020; and that same year social media giants censored a true story from a major newspaper founded by Alexander Hamilton in order to assist their political allies. Treating the U.S. president worse than a terrorist spokesman, however, was something new.

In response, President Trumps followers flocked to Parler, a Twitter competitor that hadnt banned him from their platform, quickly making it a top-downloaded app in the Apple and Google Play stores. Seeing the threat to their censorship, on Saturday both stores announced they would ban the companys app. That evening, their web host, Amazon Web Services, took Parler entirely off the internet.

These actions cant be overstated: To ban an app from the major stores is to essentially ban it from being used by any of your customers and at the moment of its greatest momentum. To ban it from the very servers it uses is to lower it into its grave. For three of the most powerful companies on the planet to do so in concert is nothing less than the end of a crucial idea that if you dont like the way somethings done, you can do it yourself, and if youre good and lucky enough you might even succeed. We called that idea the American dream.

But the very existence of men like Eich, as well as the ongoing occasional leaks and small rebellions within the tech giants, speak to a community of dissidents throughout Silicon Valley that until this final moment had seen few reasons to start something new. By the end of the weekend, that calculus had irrevocably changed and Avila and a small number of other conscientious objectors had launched the first salvo against the core of Big Tech by starting a new company called RightForge.

The mission is simple on its face: create an internet governed by the principles enshrined in our Declaration, Constitution, and Bill of Rights. The execution, however, requires something more than previous attempts to combat Big Tech supremacy: Instead of playing whack-a-mole by challenging platforms and software, go after the rot at the core, creating a separate, sprawling infrastructure built on hard work, skill, and servers. That is, a second internet.

Its a fundamental problem wed never had to think about before. What happens when the companies that own the ground say you cant build here anymore if youre a conservative, a free-thinking scientist, an upset parent, or simply a Christian?

Thats no hyperbole: Just last month, GoDaddy cut the legs out from Texas Right To Life for providing a forum to protect the constitutional right to life by reporting violations of the states new law. The publicity GoDaddy received from the corporate press was so unanimously positive, a company called DigitalOcean jumped on the bus, crowing that they deserved credit for deplatforming Christians they werent even officially doing business with yet.

The tyrants who seek to control arent brave, nor are they new and its far from the first time the lords who own the land have told the rest they cant build there anymore. Four hundred years ago, the Puritans set sail for the Americas under just such circumstances. Theyd hoped to land in the colonies down south, just as Americans had hoped for a free internet, but forces outside their control had a different plan so they chartered their own founding and forged their own destinies.

RightForge seeks to do just that, because today that is the only way forward. While Ive devoted my life to journalism, everything is at stake; if the internet is not free, honest journalism itself is threatened along with honest political debate, education, science, and the rest.

Wherever despotism abounds, President Calvin Coolidge warned the American Society of Newspaper Editors nearly a century ago, the sources of public information are first to be brought under its control.

Few in politics, the press, or tech recall his warning; worse yet, few still believe it. The most powerful insiders in the world have turned on the American people and the heritage of liberty we cherish, proudly taking aim at our open society. The only choice remaining is to create an alternative; if we dont forge our own path free from their control, this night weve entered will only grow darker and longer.

So, on the first Monday of the month I joined them in their fight as chief communications director, where Ill be defending and expanding an internet where people of all politics and religions can communicate, interact, and conduct commerce free from arbitrary power.

This mission stands in support of honest journalism and against those who seek to censor it, so far from leaving, Ill be remaining at The Federalist. Were on the front lines of every single battle for our culture and country, and Im anxious for the fray.

This fight is a crucial one. One by one, from science and the universities to banking and commerce, press and opinion, conservatives are losing access. We may soon need alternates to all these things and will need access to an internet infrastructure to build them.

Its as easy to be optimistic as it is pessimistic neither posture requires much effort beyond a smile or a frown. Assuming everything will be OK that the rulers will overreach and grow weary, or that some mythical backlash is coming isnt realistic, and is as incompatible with the American way as defeatism in the face of difficult odds. Big Tech might be big, but were a strong people with the intelligence, the technology, the means, and the grit to fight for our freedoms and forge our own destinies.

Weve done it before; were doing it again.

Christopher Bedford is a senior editor at The Federalist and chief communications officer at RightForge.

Here is the original post:
Freedom From Censorship: Inside The Battle To Build A Second Internet - The Federalist