Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

One-Punch Man Fans Discover the Lengths the Manga Went to Avoid Censors – ComicBook.com

It is no secret that Japan censors some of its manga's most scandalous moments, but fans of One-Punch Man did learn recently how far the series has gone to outwit those guidelines. Over on Reddit, the conversation cropped up after a user pointed out an alleged instance of bypassed censorship which you can never unsee. So if you want to still be able to look at Puri Puri Prisoner without flinching, you better turn around now!

You can thank the user birdofnoel on Reddit for pointing out the rather salacious fact. The fan made a post on Reddit showing off One-Punch Man volume six which can be seen here. It is there fans can see Puri Puri Prisoner standing tall in all his muscular glory upon the volume's first page, but he is nude. As censorship laws dictate, the man's genitals are whited out to keep things kid-friendly... but artist Yusuke Murata found a way to rig the system.

Puri Puri Prisoner is on the other side off the volume's title page. On that title page, the text "One-Punch Man Vol. 6" can be found, and it is positioned strategically. That means if you were to, say, shine a light on this thin page that a secret image would reveal itself. It turns out the "6" on the title page is positioned so that it resembles the genitals which Puri Puri Prisoner had to obscure to appease the manga censors.

And if that is not equal parts genius and diabolical, then nothing is. Sure, this isn't the first time something like this has been done in manga, but fans are a bit surprised Murata went to such lengths. One-Punch Man isn't an ecchi series by any means, but its artist knows the tricks of that trade.

But before you go looking for this cover up, you will want to hit the pause button. The English version of volume six does not contain this secret, and the same goes for other translations from Brazil and beyond. It seems like this slip only made it past the first run or so of the Japanese volume, so Puri Puri Prisoner has been censored for good.

Did you ever notice this clever work around? Or do you wish you could unsee the One-Punch Man scene? Let me know in the comments or hit me up on Twitter @MeganPetersCB to talk all things comics and anime!

Disclosure: ComicBook is owned by CBS Interactive, a division of ViacomCBS.

Go here to see the original:
One-Punch Man Fans Discover the Lengths the Manga Went to Avoid Censors - ComicBook.com

Botswana: Censorship is not the cure for Covid-19 – Daily Maverick

Botswana President Mokgweetsi Masisi. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Aaron Ufumeli)

The glitter of Botswanas shining example of African democracy is fading, as the country of 2.3 million people slowly slides towards authoritarianism.

The trend began under former president Ian Khama, who silenced critical media and cowed citizens into apathy. His term in office ended in April 2018.

Early indications that his successor, Mokgweetsi Masisi vice-president for four years had a penchant for intolerance was evinced in the run-up to the ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) congress in April 2019 when he openly thwarted his rival, Pelonomi Venson-Moitois incipient challenge for the party presidency.

The Covid-19 pandemic has led to further centralisation of power: Parliament recently passed an Emergency Powers Act that gives Masisi sweeping powers to rule by decree for a six-month period.

It was bulldozed through by the majority BDP in the face of opposition protests that putting power in the hands of one man would breed corruption and infringe on the powers of other branches of government.

As of Monday 23 April, Botswana has reported one death and 22 cases of people infected with Covid-19. The country has been placed under a 28-day lockdown, which ends on 30 April.

Masisi and his government have not been able to explain the need for a lengthy state of emergency, except to argue vaguely that the Public Health Act is too weak to enforce a lockdown.

One alarming provision of the presidents emergency powers is the introduction of a prison term of up to five years or a $10,000 fine for anyone publishing information with the intention to deceive the public about Covid-19 or measures taken by the government to address the pandemic.

Critics say the law, with broad and vague definitions, is a gift to authoritarian leaders who want to use the public health crisis to grab power and suppress freedom of speech.

Masisis backers argue that the law is needed as a deterrent. It has become necessary to curtail some rights to prevent the spread of the virus, said BDP spokesperson, Kagelelo Banks Kentse.

There are well-grounded fears that the emergency powers will be used to extend the governments grip on supposedly independent institutions. Already there are concerns that the security forces are meting out heavy-handed justice in the name of enforcing the lockdown.

Two police officers in central Botswana are facing assault charges, while a schoolteacher was arrested after challenging the governments claim that a health worker who screened lawmakers during a heated parliamentary debate on the state of emergency had tested positive for Covid-19.

On his Facebook page, the teacher also questioned why people infected with Covid-19 in hospital were not recovering or developing further complications.

It takes five days for corona to manifest in its victim. We are in the 14th day of lockdown. Common sense says patients should be showing signs of infection, said Rakkie Kelesamile.

Police say Kelesamiles arrest is part of a larger effort to crack down on alleged misinformation under section 30 of the Emergency Powers Act. His lawyer, Kgosietsile Ngakaagae complains that the government is trying to criminalise the airing of opinions.

The interpretation of freedom of speech is wrong, he said. Making personal observations should not be criminalised.

Days earlier, police had arrested Justice Motlhabane the spokesperson of Botswana Patriotic Front, an opposition party with ties to former president Khama for degrading and maligning the leadership.

The charges were labelled worrying by the Botswana Federation of Public, Private and Parastatal Sector Unions. The charges were not brought under the Emergency Powers Act, but the countrys Penal Code.

Motlhabane and Oratile Dikologang are accused of suggesting on a Facebook page, Botswana Trending News, that Masisi had declared a lengthy state of emergency so that he could deal with his political rivals and business competitors.

A police spokesperson, assistant commissioner Dipheko Motube, said that the three men had published an offensive statement against the government as well as degrading and maligning the leadership of the country.

Motlhabane, who is out on bail, denied the charges, saying he does not have access to the Facebook account. He told INK Centre that the police gave him electric shocks on several occasions, while demanding certain information about a coup by the former president [Ian Khama].

They placed a Taser on my buttocks and in between my thighs, he claimed.

His lawyer, Biggie Butale, and president of Botswana Patriotic Front, insisted police do not have a case against his client.

He is not the administrator of the Facebook account in question, he said, adding: Police never questioned him over Covid-19 they asked him about a coup. You wonder what they are looking for.

Several other people have been charged under the Emergency Powers Act.

A South African woman, Charmaine Ibrahim, appeared in court in Botswana on 27 March for alleging that two fellow South Africans in the country had tested positive for Covid-19. Ibrahim, 35, is out on bail.

A lawyer, Mboki Chilisa, commented on social media that there is no point in punishing innocuous false statements which no right-thinking member of the public could ever believe.

The emergency powers also risk worsening the already adversarial relationship between the government and private media. The Act prohibits journalists from using source(s) other than the [Botswana] Director of Health Services or the World Health Organisation when reporting on Covid-19.

Journalists who use other sources potentially face a fine of $10,000 or a five-year jail term. The executive director of the Media Institute of Southern Africa (Botswana chapter), Tefo Phatshwane, objected that the emergency prohibits independent journalists from holding those in power to account.

He said Masisi has started a censorship pandemic, using wide-ranging restrictions as a cover to violate freedom of expression.

As journalists, we cant rely on a government that we are expected to police, he says.

If the coronavirus outbreak has taught us anything beyond the necessity of washing our hands, it is that its victim has been leadership. Bureaucracy and incompetence have made it difficult to trust the WHO and governments worldwide.

On 21 March, Masisi, who has a penchant for air travel, defied the lockdown to fly to Windhoek to witness the swearing-in of Namibian President Hage Geingob. He insisted the trip was essential to enable leaders to discuss strategies to combat Covid-19.

The government also botched the handling of the death of Botswanas first victim of Covid-19. A local newspaper reported that the funeral of the elderly woman, from Ramotswa in the south-east of the country, was not handled in a manner consistent with guidelines for the burial of victims.

The government admitted days later that she had died of the disease.

It is tempting to demand prompt action to combat those who undermine national and global efforts to combat the pandemic through disinformation. But Nkgakaagae insists that censorship should not be part of the cure.

The government should identify the most efficient responses and communicate them to the public and allow reasonable and genuinely held opinions to flourish.

Government has to engage the public in dialogue, he said. DM

This article was produced by the INK Centre for Investigative Journalism in Botswana, in association with IJ Hub.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Read the rest here:
Botswana: Censorship is not the cure for Covid-19 - Daily Maverick

Bitcoin Is Not Cash For the World: Recap of Webit Fireside Chat with Roger Ver – Cointelegraph

On April 29, Cointelegraph participated in a fireside chat event organized by the Webit Foundation. The panel, with the title of Can blockchain be a solution for the upcoming economic crisis, featured Roger Ver from Bitcoin.com as the main speaker.

Like all events during the Coronavirus pandemic, the panel was held virtually, with its participants dialing in via video conference. The talk was hosted by Dr. Plamen Russev, executive chairman of Webit Foundation. The chat featured Roger Ver, Bitcoin.coms executive chairman, and Kristina Lucrezia Cornr, managing editor at Cointelegraph, as a Q&A moderator.

Vers answers at the panel can be summarized as a deep belief in freedom and libertarian economics. He believes these ideals to be the answers to the crisis at hand. He also focused on censorship an issue that has regained relevance amid the Coronavirus pandemic.

Ver was greatly disturbed by the harsh censorship policy enacted by Youtube in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. He cited an example of two doctors who made statements going against the mainstream narrative behind the pandemic, and whose video was deleted a few days after it was published.

The policy is allegedly the culprit behind a new wave of bans to crypto content creators, which recently hit high-profile influencers like Tone Vays and Crypto Lark.

Ver explained his view against censorship:

I think the solution to people saying crazy or wrong things is other people being able to rebut those things, not massive censorship.

When discussing censorship, Ver also threw several jabs against the Bitcoin community, and said that his biggest regret throughout the years was not being even louder when speaking out against censorship in the cryptocurrency community.

This refers to 2015, when the moderators of the /r/Bitcoin Reddit forum began censoring any discussion relating to Bitcoin XT a proposal for larger blocks in Bitcoin (BTC) that can be considered as the ideological ancestor to Bitcoin Cash (BCH).

Ver holds a utilitarian view of the purpose of cryptocurrency, focusing heavily on its use as a censorship-resistant payment system. He emphasized that it is free trade that creates wealth in the world, while the lockdowns destroy the ability to trade freely and thus, the economy. He also considers the multi-trillion dollar stimulus package to be theft of a similar nature to counterfeiting money.

Cryptocurrency, as the freest form of money, would be the best tool to escape the governments excessive control, according to Ver. But he also believes that it can only happen when cryptocurrency is used for payments, which is something that Bitcoin is no longer useful for, he claimed:

The sad part about what everybody is calling Bitcoin today, it doesnt have those characteristics that made the early investors and adopters so excited about it early on. Most of those people are now working on things like Bitcoin Cash or Ethereum.

He claimed that most of its current supporters are either speculators betting on future speculation, or people who still didnt figure out that the project is no longer trying to be cash for the world.

You can check out the full panel by clicking on this link.

Read more:
Bitcoin Is Not Cash For the World: Recap of Webit Fireside Chat with Roger Ver - Cointelegraph

‘Selling censorship’: proposed sale of .org web registry sparks fears for non-profits – The Guardian

Websites using .org domain names fear they could lose their web addresses as intense backlash over the domain registrys proposed sale continues.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann), the not-for-profit organization that coordinates the internets domain name system, is deciding whether control of .org will be sold to a private equity firm about which little is known.

The change of hands has raised concerns about censorship and how internet infrastructure affects free speech.

Websites using .org can be registered by anybody, but over the past decade the suffix has become the go-to domain term for not-for-profits and charities. The transfer of control of .org domains has left many concerned that a new owner could raise the price of addresses on the .org registry, making it prohibitively expensive for not-for-profits that have come to rely on its name recognition.

The not-for-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), along with the Domain Name Rights Coalition, Access Now, and others, wrote to Icann last week urging it to stop the sale.

Essentially it means selling censorship, Mitch Stoltz, a senior staff attorney at EFF focusing on free speech and trademark issues, said of the sale. It could mean suspending domain names, causing websites to go dark when some other powerful interest wants them gone.

These concerns were exacerbated when in 2019, Icann removed the cap on the price for a .org domain, having previously prohibited registrars from being charged more than $8.25.

Until now, .org has been managed by the not-for-profit Public Interest Registry (PIR) created by the Internet Society exclusively for the purpose. Icann awarded control of .org to the Internet Society, another not-for-profit, in 2002.

Icann is deciding if it will approve the sale of the domain registry to Ethos Capital, a private firm that emerged recently. Ethos has stated that it will keep prices low, but critics say because it is a for-profit company, it has no economic incentive to do so.

Icann abruptly delayed its decision on Monday after receiving a scathing letter from the California attorney general, Xavier Becerra, on 15 April about the potential sale of .org.

Becerras letter came after not-for-profits and other internet freedom advocates said privatizing the domain registry would saddle it with more than $300m in debt.

Because Icann is incorporated in California, Becerra is in charge of ensuring it is living up to its commitments. It will provide an update on 4 May.

There is mounting concern that ICANN is no longer responsive to the needs of its stakeholders, Becerra wrote.

The attorney general of Pennsylvania is also reportedly investigating the deal. Because PIR, the organization selling .org, is incorporated there, the state would have the power to stop it from happening.

Andrew Sullivan, the CEO of the Internet Society, said those using the .org domain registry would be better served by Ethos, which would have more resources than a not-for-profit to fund them.

He noted that the firm had been making changes responsive to criticism about the potential sale. Commitments include a cap on price increases for eight years from the start of the current contract and a stewardship council that will have a say over policies affecting .org sites.

This shows Ethos is trying very hard to be a good steward of this resource, he said.

Former members of Icann disagree. On Monday, its former CEO, Michael Roberts, and other former members wrote a letter criticizing the decision and imploring his successors to delay the transaction for six months.

We write to express our deep dismay at ICANNs rejection of its defining public-interest regulatory purpose as demonstrated in the totally inappropriate proposed sale of the .org delegation, they wrote. ICANN has not meaningfully acted to address the likely proposed service cuts, increase in prices or trafficking of data of non-profits to obtain additional revenue.

The debate has taken on new life amid the coronavirus pandemic. Advocates for not-for-profits are concerned about the debt incurred by the sale as coronavirus creates economic uncertainty.

In his letter to Icann, Becerra said the $300m in debt will change the relationship .org has with its sites.

If the sale goes through and PIRs business model fails to meet expectations, it may have to make significant cuts in operations, Becerra said. Such cuts would undoubtedly affect the stability of the .org registry.

This is of particular concern as not-for-profit sites have become more important than ever during the coronavirus pandemic, said Amy Sample Ward, CEO of the technology not-for-profit NTEN.

Most of the entities leading in data and information aggregation, scientific investigation and developments, community resourcing and response are all non-profits with .org websites, she said. Those organizations also stand to lose a great deal if this deal proceeds.

Read more:
'Selling censorship': proposed sale of .org web registry sparks fears for non-profits - The Guardian

The Mat-Su school board and the urge to censor – Anchorage Daily News

F. Scott Fitzgeralds novel The Great Gatsby begins with narrator Nick Carraway telling the reader,

In my younger and more vulnerable years, my father gave me some advice that Ive been turning over in my mind ever since. Whenever you feel like criticizing anyone, he told me, just remember that all the people in this world havent had the advantages that youve had.

I thought about this when I read that the Mat-Su School Board, taking time off from a pandemic, voted 5-2 to ban The Great Gatsby and four other works of fiction from high school courses. The book was cited for language and sexual references. Apparently the censors were not disturbed that Gatsby, near the end of the novel, is murdered.

But I am not going to criticize the school board. I have had an advantage they have not had. While they were working, raising their families, I was off reading books. By now, thousands of them. This has given me a perspective on what makes a good book, a bad book and has destroyed any nascent interest I had in censorship. If you watch thousands of Major League Baseball games, you will have a deeper understanding of the game than the average fan. The school board members are, at best, average fans.

I cant get too upset because I know that some students, ever resourceful and imaginative, will buy or borrow The Great Gatsby, or Tim OBriens The Things They Carried, Joseph Hellers Catch-22, Ralph Ellisons Invisible Man and Maya Angelous I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings. These students, its a pretty safe guess, will be mystified by the ban. Some of the boys will look for, as we said at Lathrop High School in Fairbanks, the good parts and find few. Besides, students protected from Gatsby use social media and can easily access such film classics such as High School Harlots and On Golden Blonde.

The urge to censor must be as basic as the urge to write. The Mat-Su school board looks ridiculous to people who read, but American censors have looked ridiculous for a long time.

Thomas Beer (1889-1940) wrote a history of American culture in the 1890s his childhood. He especially singled out magazines for self-censoring to escape Victorian censure. Beer notes that the great magazines like Harpers, which reached the entire country, had stories about every creature under the sun except one: a horizontal woman.

This anecdote is a bit of hyperbole, as Beer later explains that the magazines would write about infidelity in a moral tract disguised as a story. A married man could take up with his neighbors wife no moving parts, please as long as the next morning the couple was tormented by guilt, terrified of what was to come, and committed suicide, preferably by drowning.

But then this was an era when the local head of the Daughters of the American Revolution, stereotypically a big, large-bosomed woman under a gigantic hat, would go to the sheriff to complain about the village atheist. The sheriff, perplexed, would wonder, Well, maam, what is he doing? Sputtering with frustration, the voice of morality would pour out, Whats he doing? Whats he doing? Whats he doing? Why, everything.

Writers look at the world through their imagination and allow their imagination to wander into complex human situations. Thats everything, to those threatened by books.

Tim OBrien, on the censors list, wrote about a lieutenant in a foxhole in Vietnam thinking about a girl. The lieutenant wasnt real, the girl wasnt real OBrien invented them but they were too real for a majority of the Mat-Su school board.

Michael Carey is an Anchorage Daily News columnist.

The rest is here:
The Mat-Su school board and the urge to censor - Anchorage Daily News