Mediaboss Marketing

By Richard Reeb| For the Victorville Daily Press

Democrats across America can hardly wait for the Biden administration to commence, impatient with the seeming delay of that glorious day caused by legal challenges to questionable balloting in battleground states brought by the campaign of President Donald Trump. Evidently, they look upon the office of the President elect as an actual one, not acknowledging the fact that Democrat Al Gore held up the transition for over a month back in 2000.

I say seeming above because only the Constitution, with its stipulation that the next administration begins on Jan. 20, 2021, can be blamed for standing in the way of four years of folly, increased taxes and spending, overregulation, indulgence of rioting, incessant propaganda and, worst of all, suppression of our constitutional rights.

We must remind ourselves that the Constitution is not just a kind of guide to political conduct; it is the supreme law of the land. That refers both to the governmental powers granted and denied, and the individual rights and liberties secured. Those impatient with the pace of political change look upon that foundational touchstone as in need of changing with the times or, equally vile, being refashioned (rather than upheld) by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Our nation has in this remarkable year of 2020 (to say the least) endured a pandemic and shutdown, massive rioting in our cities and a presidential campaign marked by shameless lying and censorship designed to push over the finish line the man who often displayed signs of severe dementia. What we have endured we will be subjected to still more.

Looking at all these shenanigans with a detached perspective is Samuel Alito, an associate justice of the Supreme Court, who actually issued an order to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to stay its vote counting until issues of constitutionality can be resolved. In a virtual speech to the Federalist Society, Alito expressed alarm over what he regards as the greatest general suppression of citizens liberties in our nations history.

As Paul Mirengoff at Powerline reported, Alitos message was that key American rights are in jeopardy. He noted, for example, that the coronavirus pandemic has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty.

We have never before seen restrictions as severe, extensive and prolonged as those experienced for most of 2020, he said.

Alito was careful to emphasize, Miengoff continues, that he wasnt diminishing the severity of the viruss threat to public health, or even taking a position on whether the restrictions are good public policy. However, he argued that the restrictions on public gatherings and worship services highlighted trends that were already present before the virus struck, including a dominance of lawmaking by executive fiat rather than by legislators and the relegation of certain rights to second-class status.

Religious rights, for example. Alito homed in on the decision of Nevada to limit church attendance to 50 people, while reopening large casinos to 50% capacity. It pains me to say it, but in certain quarters religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right, he concluded.

Take a quick look at the Constitution, Alito urged. You will see the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, which protects religious liberty. You will not find a craps clause, or a blackjack clause, or a slot machine clause.

Alito made his remarks, mind you, as the encroachment on our liberties continues, and in the face of Biden advisor Sheldon Whitehouses threat to restructure the Supreme Court if it makes a pro-gun ruling in the current judicial session. Thats a polite term for court packing, which the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg opposed.

Add to this the frequent demands by leftist Democrats for a truth commission to squash the careers of anyone who served in the Trump administration, worked prominently in Trump campaigns or contributed substantially to them. After a finding of complicity in alleged evil, the object will be to demand that positions in the public or private sector be closed to these miscreants.

Actions follow words. For political purposes, but also out of misguided ideological conviction, the Democrats have hurled charges of racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia and even transphobia against the Trump administration and all those in support of it. Now comes the fun part, which consists in validating all those specious charges by our equivalent of the French Revolutions reign of terror that sent thousands to the guillotine. If such is not now available, just give the Left time and opportunity, and some device equally deadly will no doubt appear.

This is not paranoia. When disregard for the Constitution coincides with fanaticism, the result is predictable: Political assassination.

Richard Reeb taught political science, philosophy and journalism at Barstow College from 1970 to 2003. He is the author of Taking Journalism Seriously: Objectivity as a Partisan Cause (University Press of America, 1999). He can be contacted at rhreeb@verizon.net.

Original post:
Thinking It Through: Censorship is all the rage, man! - VVdailypress.com

@reggi3jReggie

JD lover, Arm Chair activist, Founder Gather Network

It is no secret that big tech has been actively monitoring and censoring users. The past three years have seen a big rise in reported censorship events by the likes of Youtube, Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

According to John Wolfsohns article on Brown Political Review; quoting here: Every 60 seconds, 3.8 million questions are entered into the Google Machine an international hegemon that has 1.7 billion users and a market value of $990 billion.

According to a November 2019 Wall Street Journal investigation, Google has been found to be manipulating search results, creating politically-partisan algorithms, and maintain blacklists to prevent users from accessing certain websites.

Facebook, which has a market value of $572 billion, and Twitter, which has a market value of $28 billion, hold considerable economic and political clout in our society, as 68 percent of Americans periodically use social media as a source for news.

What is more alarming is that such censorship is getting worse, case in point - the US elections - we will come to that later in the article. Below depicts a diagram of censorship in the world, notice anything?

Western countries seem to have the most free speech, but is that really so? Lets rewind the clocks back and take a look back at recent history.

Most people should be familiar with what censorship actually is, but for people who are not, here is the good old Oxford dictionary definition:

The act or policy of censoring books etc..

Thanks Oxford.

Great definition. Here is a better version according to a user on the popular (and probably more relevant) website Urban Dictionary:

Stopping the free flow of art and ideas.

Here is a working example of what censorship is, again from a user on the popular site UrbanDictionary.

Very eloquently explained, Yosheek.

Many years ago when myspace was still a thing, and people were still using Limewire to wait two hours to download the latest hits - online censorship was still in its infancy.

Why?

Largely due to the fact the dominant social media platforms were still coming up.

But, online censorship did exist.

Take the case of Myspace, according to MoveOn, they claimed that; that the website practices censorship by not showing anti-media ads, removing fake profiles for high-profile media executives like Rupert Murdoch, and attempting to force users away from using certain third-party Flash applications on their profiles.

This is just one example of censorship within the budding social media platform. I digress, moving on.

While Myspace is just one example, Censorship in various forms has existed for millennia, the earliest recorded example being was in 443 BC when the first office of the censor was established in Rome.

In fact, in the ancient Greek communities, Censorship was viewed as an honorable task.

China followed it through with a Censorship law in 300AD. From here Censorship kept evolving and started to proliferate into many forms of society in Print media, television ads, and now social media.

The key difference is that the general public was not as acutely aware as they are now, largely due to technology, and the rapid spread of information.

Index Librorum Prohibitorum (1564) - The list of Banned or Prohibited books

While many may think that censorship has no place in the world, it does serve a purpose.

Now what that purpose is, may be debatable.

From stopping the spread of misinformation, or to further a party(ies) hidden agenda, for either direct or in-direct monetary gains.

An example being censoring a certain individual who looks like an orange Cheeto to supposedly provide a material advantage to his aged opponent (None of this is proven fact, Jack please dont block my 200 follower Twitter account).

This is an extreme example, however, there are other grey examples of big tech flexing:

Banning Youtube crypto accounts or Facebook banning Crypto ads, albeit Youtube did reinstate some of the accounts, it just goes to show that even in the free world big tech is acting like big brother and the moral police.

Lets not forget the poor souls in China whose nine to five include going through thousands of questionable videos to censor them.

While the above include some questionable acts of censorship, lets not forget that depiction of acts of terrorism, child pornography, violence, and other clear examples of why we need censorship.

It is a fine balance, between respecting free speech, and keeping the peace.

Recent events have shown the dark side of censorship, but it is a needed evil. However the question is about the fine line here, and respect for that fine line.

Censoring actual content that is harmful or dangerous, and not using some vague justification to censor content that is in the grey area or open for interpretation.

To put it more plainly. - Big Tech, stop abusing your power, censorship is needed but in legitimate cases only. Stop using censorship to further your agendas.

And for those companies that will continue to abuse their power,

I have three words for you:

Go. Fornicate. Yourself.

With Warm Regards,

Reggie

All of the above is my personal opinion and does not represent the opinions of any organizations, parties, politically exposed individuals, individuals that look like flaming cheetos, dictators or anyone else. None of this constitutes any form of advice let alone financial advice or solicitation.

You can solicit me for a drink though.

Preferably JD honey.

Create your free account to unlock your custom reading experience.

Here is the original post:
Censorship: From Ancient Greece To Today's Big Tech - A Brief Overview - hackernoon.com

The World Health Organisation has removed social media filters which were censoring the words Taiwan and China from its Facebook page after an online backlash, but said the blocks were because of an onslaught of cyber attacks.

The about-face comes amid intense criticism over Chinas continued blocking of Taiwan which has gone more than 215 days without a local case of Covid-19 from participation in meetings of the WHOs decision-making body, the World Health Assembly.

This week internet users began reporting the WHOs Facebook page would not allow comments that included the word Taiwan. The Guardians attempts to post comments found it was also blocking the word China. Posters began replacing characters in the word to get past the censors, including , or using the islands former name, Formosa.

Taiwans foreign ministry said the block ran contrary to the neutrality the WHO should be upholding, and expressed its strong regret and dissatisfaction, but a spokesman for the WHO said the moves were a practical measure which didnt reflect a value judgement or policy.

During the World Health Assembly, WHO faces an onslaught of cyberattacks by online activists on a number of controversial issues, using keywords such as Taiwan and China, the spokesman said.

The social media team applied filters as the onslaught hindered its ability to moderate conversations, he said. After the block was lifted the WHOs page was flooded with pro-Taiwan and anti-China messages.

The WHOs history with Taiwan has been controversial, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. China, which considers Taiwan a rogue province and its government to be separatists, has blocked its admission to the WHA despite an increase in international support for their inclusion.

Intense lobbying for Taiwans inclusion preceded a WHA meeting last week but it remained excluded. The WHO maintains any inclusion is a matter for WHA member states to vote on.

Taipei says it has much to share with the global community given its success in preventing a large outbreak. It has reported around 580 cases of Covid-19 in total, mostly imported and contained by the quarantine system, and just seven deaths.

Go here to see the original:
WHO drops censorship of words 'Taiwan' and 'China' on social media after backlash - The Guardian

On November 11, the government issued an order bringing online news portals and Over The Top (OTT) contentproviders such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Hotstar under the regulatory purview of the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry. This is a move with far-reaching consequences and could kickstart an era of more frequent and stricter censorship on what online services air.

The Information and Broadcasting Ministry has found a vast swathe of unregulated content, namely online news and Over the top (OTT) platforms which had escaped any architecture of regulation. While the print media were regulated by the Press Council of India, and television content both news and entertainment was being regulated by the Cable Networks Regulation Act (2005), content published online, the government felt, fell into a black hole that did not permit oversight.

So, what kind of oversight will this be? How will it work? And what is the potential for misuse or overreach?

Guest: Anuradha Raman, Associate Editor, The Hindu.

Find the In Focus podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and Stitcher. Search for In Focus by The Hindu.

Write to us with comments and feedback at socmed4@thehindu.co.in

Dear subscriber,

Thank you!

Your support for our journalism is invaluable. Its a support for truth and fairness in journalism. It has helped us keep apace with events and happenings.

The Hindu has always stood for journalism that is in the public interest. At this difficult time, it becomes even more important that we have access to information that has a bearing on our health and well-being, our lives, and livelihoods. As a subscriber, you are not only a beneficiary of our work but also its enabler.

We also reiterate here the promise that our team of reporters, copy editors, fact-checkers, designers, and photographers will deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Suresh Nambath

See more here:
Will regulation of digital media lead to an era of government censorship? | The Hindu In Focus podcast - The Hindu

In an act of online political censorship aimed at silencing left-wing and socialist views, Twitter has suspended the account of the International Youth and Students for Social Equality in the US.

The IYSSE is the youth and student movement of the Socialist Equality Party and is affiliated with the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) and the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS).

The IYSSE is an officially recognized campus group on dozens of university campuses in the US, the UK, France, Germany, Sri Lanka and Australia. At Berlins Humboldt University, the IYSSE holds multiple seats in the student parliament.

At approximately 6:00 a.m. on Wednesday, members and supporters of the IYSSE noted that the Twitter account @IYSSE_US had been stripped of its profile and header image and the account timeline of tweets had been replaced by a message that says, Account suspended: Twitter suspends accounts that violate the Twitter Rules. A link to the Twitter Rules page was included as part of the notice.

When the IYSSE contacted Twitter to demand the reinstatement of the account, the company replied, Your account was suspended because it appears you may be managing a number of Twitter accounts.

The IYSSE responded:

The International Youth and Students for Social Equality is a campus political organization officially recognized on dozens of campuses in the United States and internationally. Each different campus chapter manages its own Twitter account. Because these chapters are affiliated with the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS), numerous chapters may post the same or similar articles from the WSWS, as is their right.

This type of activity is explicitly condoned in Twitters guidelines of September 2020. The guidance states that organizations with related but separate chapters or branches, such as a business with multiple locations, is not a violation of this policy.

We request (1) a more thorough, detailed showing of any alleged violations, and (2) that the suspension of this group (@IYSSE_US) be lifted immediately.

Twitter gave no additional information about the suspension, and the IYSSEs account remains suspended.

Taking place one week after the 2020 US elections, the shutdown of the IYSSE (US) account has occurred amidst increasing online censorship of left-wing and socialist publications, combined with an aggressive attack on free speech by all of the social media tech giants before, during and after the presidential elections.

Among the final posts on the IYSSE account late Tuesday were a retweet of a link to the WSWS article titled, Why did some working class regions vote for Trump? There was also a retweet of a post by SEP National Secretary and 2020 US presidential candidate Joseph Kishore on the significance of the coronavirus vaccine announcement by Pfizer and the importance of independent political action by the working class against the pandemic and the murderous ruling class response to it.

Twitter is engaging in political censorship to silence a leading voice of socialist politics among young people and students around the world. The IYSSE (US) has beenthrough its publishing activity and engagement on Twitter and other popular social media platformsthe most consistent voice for socialism and against racism, right-wing nationalism, the threat of fascism and for the international unity of the working class across national boundaries in a common struggle against the capitalist system.

Responding to the Twitter suspension, IYSSE National Secretary Genevieve Leigh said, There is no legitimate reason for the suspension of the IYSSE Twitter account. We know that particularly over the past two years there has been a concerted effort on the part of social media companies, at the behest of Washington, to censor left-wing, socialist, antiwar and progressive websites. These efforts have been well documented and opposed by the WSWS.

This political censorship reflects the fear that a genuine socialist perspective, if allowed a fair hearing, will find a mass audience in the US and internationally. There is widespread popular opposition to these efforts to suppress freedom of speech and thought, especially among youth.

The suspension of the IYSSE (US) Twitter account must be seen within the context of the longstanding and ongoing censorship measures by Google and the other social media platforms against the World Socialist Web Site. Google Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai admitted on the congressional record on October 28 that the search giant had been censoring the WSWS.

There have been several instances of Reddit moderators banning the WSWS from the approved whitelist of domain names and labeling content links from the WSWS as an unacceptable source. Meanwhile, as far back as August 2018, Facebook has removed the accounts of left-wing publishers, including deleting the accounts of World Socialist Web Site reporters on the basis of unsubstantiated claims of inauthentic behavior.

The suspension of the IYSSE (US) account by Twitter is the first time that one of the major social media platforms has moved to shut down a primary account of an organization connected with the ICFI and the WSWS.

We call on all readers of the World Socialist Web Site to demand that Twitter restore the account of the IYSSE (US), @IYSSE_US, by posting statements to @TwitterSupport.

View post:
Stop online censorship: Restore the Twitter account of the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (US)! - WSWS