Mediaboss Marketing

Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Rainer Puster/iStock/Getty Images Plus, macky_ch/iStock/Getty Images Plus, and ayzek/iStock/Getty Images Plus.

As the coronavirus pandemic spreads across the world, so does disinformation (intentional deceit, at times peddled by governments themselves) and misinformation (the spread of falsehoods that may or may not be intentional) about its origins, reach, and potential cures. Meanwhile, multiple different regimes are citing fears about misinformation and fake news to suppress unflattering information about the handling of the disease. To learn more about how three giantsChina, Russia, and Brazilare both handling and perpetuating misinformation about COVID-19, Jennifer Daskal invited country experts to discuss the current state of affairs: Mia Shuang Li, a former Beijing-based journalist, who is now a research associated at Yale Law Schools Paul Tsai China Center; Justin Sherman, a fellow at the Atlantic Councils Cyber Statecraft Initiative,columnist at Wired, and close follower of developments in Russia; and Roberta Braga, an associate director at the Atlantic Councils Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center and an expert on Brazil. This conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Jennifer Daskal: Welcome, Mia, Justin, and Roberta! An initial question for all of you: What kinds of disinformation is percolating in the countries you cover with respect to the pandemic? And what has been the government response?

Mia Shuang Li: In China, the state is pushing a narrative on social mediausing both government accounts and sponsored nongovernment accountsthat authoritarianism is better at mobilizing all-society effort in a public health crisis, including citizens and private sector companies. This creates a rally around the flag effect, making the narrative seem a lot more supported and more like a widely accepted reality.

At this point, most of the population is too traumatized by all that has occurred to question the official narrative.

Justin Sherman: The Russian government itself has been very actively spreading disinformation about the virus, both in Russia and around the world. As early as January, Russian state media were propagating all kinds of lies about the coronavirus, like saying it was made in the United States. Moscow has used these kinds of false statementspushed on television, on social media, and elsewherein an effort to sow divisiveness and confusion abroad and to undermine trust in credible news sources.

This is being coupled with Russian efforts to demand that social media companies and other media platforms remove information about the coronavirus that Moscow deems false, information that is being viewed by those physically residing within the country.

Roberta Braga: In Brazils case, a lot of misleading information is coming from the top. Brazil is the largest, most populous country in Latin America, and the biggest economy in the region. Around 85 percent of Brazils population live in urban areas, with over 16 percent of the national population living in So Paulo and Rio de Janeiro alone. Brazil also has over 13.6 million people living in favelas. Informal workers comprise a large part of the Brazilian population. In this context, where for many people staying home can mean they face hunger, the most misleading narrative has been that of health vs. economy. In his live addresses to the country, President Bolsonaro says that the virus should not do more harm to the economy, and by extension peoples livelihoods, than it does to peoples health. So, in an effort to emphasize the importance of keeping Brazilians employed and working, he has built a campaign against social distancing.

A judicial order was required to stop a campaign he promoted using the hashtag #Brazilcannotstop. And as recently as April 10, Bolsonaro was taking to the streets in Braslia in his public effort to push back against social isolation. This has had an effect. Recent statistics say only around 50 percent of people in Brazil are social isolating. While local governments have taken measures to protect health, when the president himself is questioning those measures, that leads to more and more people failing to comply. Recent reporting from Reuters show 49 percent of So Paulo residents were considered to be in social isolation as of April 8, compared to a weekday peak of 56 percent on March 30.

Daskal: Mia, many reports suggest that the coronavirus situation in China was worse than is assertedbut that negative information about the persistence and spread of disease was suppressed by the Chinese government. Do you have a sense as to whether that is the case?

Shuang Li: Chinas numbers are, the best I can tell, vastly, vastly undercounted inside Wuhan, and slightly undercounted outside. First, many died at home without ever getting a diagnosis. Those cases were not counted. No city in China tested the deceased. Second, asymptomatic cases never went to the hospital and therefore were never tested or counted. Iceland, which has done some of the most widespread testing in the world, found that approximately 50 percent of those infected never showed any symptoms. Third, only those who showed symptoms, went to the hospital, and were able to be admitted were counted. Inside Wuhan that is a very small portion of the patients. Ive read on Weibo that even hospital directors could not get friends and families hospital beds.

Daskal: Roberta, you described Bolsonaros concerning narrative about the disease. How is he responding to those who critique his approach?

Braga: Brazil is a democracy, and freedom of speech is a strong pillar of that democracy. Certainly weve seen dissent. For weeks, Brazilians in social isolation in key capital cities like Fortaleza, Braslia, So Paulo, Porto Alegre, Rio de Janeiro, and others have banged pots and pans together and called for a removal of Bolsonaro in a reaction to his public addresses.On April 16, Bolsonaro fired Health Minister Luiz Henrique Mandetta, and the protests exploded even more. That said, of course, President Bolsonaro doesnt like to be criticized, much in the way that President Donald Trump doesnt take well to criticism.

Bolsonaro also continues to criticize the Brazilian media, saying they are twisting the facts and exacerbating polarization. This has really contributed to a crisis of trust in media. And at a time when Brazilians access to information is so important, people in Brazil are really struggling to trust in the independent journalists who are providing them with factual information. Fringe media outlets are becoming increasingly popular.

Daskal: Justin, you have written about Russias internal efforts to crack down on what it claims to be fake news in response to the pandemic. Can you talk a bit about how this is being done?

Sherman: In mid-March, Roskomnadzor, which is Russias internet and media regulator, threatened stringent action against anyone disseminating false information about the virus. (Again, false information here is defined by the Russian government.) It then began issuing content removal orders to a variety of media outlets, including those incorporated within and outside of Russia.

These takedown orders mostly draw on existing laws that give Roskomnadzor the authority to order media companies to censor particular types or pieces of content. That said, the upper house of Russias Parliament voted at the end of March to expand criminal punishments for those spreading false information with significant public health effects.

As for what is actually being censored by the government, there is still relatively little information available, but from what we do know, its clear that the censorship has increasingly targeted anything critical of the Russian governments response to the virus and anything that contradicts the official government narrative. In March, a couple of takedowns focused on claims that Moscow had a curfew in place when it didnt. But other takedowns have focused on everything from social media posts that contradict Russias official figures on infection counts (which many say seem suspiciously low) to claims that Russian hospitals didnt have enough supplies to deal with the pandemic (which is now something that even the Moscow Health Department has started warning about).

Daskal: Roberta, there has been a lot of attention to the fact that Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube removed content from Bolsonaro, on the grounds that it violated their terms of service. Can you talk a bit about that?

Braga: Twitter recently took down two Twitter posts by Bolsonaro. The posts contained videos of the president walking around Braslia and talking with small-business owners and vendors on the streets. In the videos, the president also talked about the need to use hydroxychloroquine for treating the virus. This has been a consistent narrativein the videos, the president was shown claiming the anti-malaria drug has worked everywhere it has been used when in reality, the drug is still in the testing phases.

Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram also took down posts that depicted the presidents claims that hydroxychloroquine was the best treatment for COVID-19.

The companies state that the posts were taken down because they violated their platforms terms of service, which prohibit the spread of false information that can cause real harm to users. The removals were apparently done so in close collaboration with the in-country teams for better understanding of the country context.

Daskal: What was the reaction to those take down decisions in Brazil?

Braga: Reactions from Brazilians followed polarized linesthose who support Bolsonaro blasted the companies for blocking and removing the content. Others praised the decisions for preserving safety and for disallowing disinformation about a health crisis that could cost countless lives in Brazil.

Though perhaps not a direct reaction to the companies actions, the Brazilian Congress has proposed legislation to reduce the spread of disinformation and to penalize those who spread false information about the coronavirus. Some of the laws call for criminalizing the spread of disinformation. One of the proposed laws would also criminalize the sharing of disinformation if you are a government official. Fact-checking organizations in Brazil also jointly authored a statement calling on authorities in Brazil to stop spreading disinformation.

Daskal: Justin, do you know how the media outlets have responded to the content removal orders? Are the media outlets criminally responsible for the content that is on their sites?

Sherman: Media entities from Russian social media service VK to American internet platforms like Instagram have complied with censorship orders from Roskomnadzor. They can be fined by the Russian government for failing to censor content, although they are more likely to be blocked than fined. Fines for spreading false information are generally directed at specific individuals. In fact, law enforcement in Russia has already opened a number of cases against people alleged to have disseminated false information about the coronavirus online.

Daskal: As companies respond to Russias takedown demands, do you know if they are doing so on a global or local scale?

Sherman: Generally, companies complying with Russian government content censorship demands do so via geoblocking. In other words, the information they remove is only removed for those who appear to be viewing it from within Russia. This underscores the fact that Moscow is focusing its censorship efforts within the country.

Daskal: Mia, you and I have previously written about the ways in which Tencentthe giant China tech company that owns WeChat, the countrysmost popular messaging apphas used its market power to effectively disconnect those who spoke out against ways in which the Chinese government was managing the epidemic. Is that something that is continuing? What other tools is (and has) the Chinese government used to stifle dissent and critiques of its handling of the pandemic?

Shuang Li: Yes, Tencent is still censoring voices that counter the official narrative, not just in public posts but also in closed chat groups. Luckily their method is not as smart as we thought. I used to think Tencent can censor based on the sentiment of content, not just keywords, but now it looks like its just keyword combos, per this very good Citizen Lab report.

Daskal: Roberta, is there any way to assess how much of a chilling effect Bolsonaros efforts have had on the mainstream medias discussion of the pandemic and its seriousness? Are people rushing to use hydroxychlororoquine as a cure?

Braga: From what Ive seen, the mainstream media in Brazil continues working to report on the pandemic in a fact-based way, sticking to the guidelines of responsible journalism. Fact-checkers havent faltered, either.

But Bolsonaros reactions have had a real effect on how the population perceives the pandemic. When the discussions on hydroxychloroquine first started happening, we saw a race on pharmacies for the medication. And some patients who needed the medication for lupus, for example, reported not being able to find the medication.

It is worth noting that there is a much higher sense of skepticism and awareness about the dangers of disinformation two years after the 2018 presidential elections. Nevertheless, we are still seeing a lot of disinformation and misinformation circulating online and through messaging platforms in Brazil.

Daskal: Justin, can you talk a bit more about the ways in which Russia is spreading disinformation about the virus outside its borders? What are the means by which it is doing so? And you mentioned falsehoods with response to the origins of the virusare you seeing other kinds of disinformation emanating from Russia as well?

Sherman: Moscow is employing numerous vectors to project and amplify disinformation about the coronavirus. State-controlled media outlets like RT and Sputnik have been pushing lies about COVID-19. Russia also is likely using groups like the Internet Research Agency to spread these falsehoods on social media as well. Some of these narratives have targeted the viruss origins. True to form, some of these falsehoods are even contradictorylike accusing the U.S. of developing the virus and then a few days later saying it was developed in Latvia. But the disinformation has covered many different angles. Recently, for example, Russian state media organizations have exaggerated British Prime Minister Boris Johnsons hospitalization with oxygen support into claims that the prime minister is on a ventilator.

Daskal: Mia, a similar question for you as the one I asked Justinare Chinas information and censorship efforts focused mainly internally?

Shuang Li: China adopts different strategies inside and outside the Great Fire Wall. Beijing relies on a host of state media accounts and diplomats on Twitter and Facebook to push its narrative. However, due to a general lack of credibility of state media outlets, it doesnt work. Recently Beijing may have begun to use commercial entities and digital marketing firms to amplify its voice on Twitter and Facebook, but still is mostly pushing its narrative in Chinese targeting Chinese speaking populations. ProPublicas Jeff Kao and I did some digging on that issue in this story.

Outside the firewall, Beijings propaganda campaign is defensive and reactionary. It sees a narrative it doesnt like, or sees its enemy having a win and tries very hard to counter it.Often it backfires. So far Beijing is having a hard time selling its narrative outside of China.

Braga: A peak of the pandemic is expected to hit Brazil in May/June. This pandemic will have a devastating effect on Brazils society, particularly given the overburdened and underfunded public health system. Brazil needs to prioritize addressing this crisis head oneveryone has a responsibility to stick to the facts and to the science. The cost could be millions of lives.

That said, Id like to end on a positive note. Local media outlets in many of Brazils favelas are working hard to create content on how to address the spread of coronavirus in those communities. We are seeing everything from independent articles to videos produced by journalists who understand the realities Brazilians living in the favelas face every day.

Daskal: Huge, huge thanks to all three of you for your time and incredible thoughtfulness.

Read more from the Free Speech Project.

Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.

More here:
Facing COVID-19 Misinformation and Censorship in Brazil, Russia, and China - Slate

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been accused of censoring parts of the British media after the couple announced theywould no longer engage with four UK newspapers.

On Monday, a representative for the couple wrote a letter toeditors of The Daily Mail, Daily Mirror, Daily Express and The Sun in which they accused the four publicationsof writing distorted, false or invasive stories about them.

The letter stated:It is gravely concerning that an influential slice of the media, over many years, has sought to insulate themselves from taking accountability for what they say or print even when they know it to be distorted, false, or invasive beyond reason.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

But the move has been criticised, with Ian Murray, executive director of the Society of Editors, claiming that Meghan and Harry are trying to undermine the press.

In a statement on the Society of Editors website, Murray said: Although the Duke and Duchess say they support a free press and all it stands for there is no escaping their actions here amount to censorship and they are setting an unfortunate example.

Murray added that while the couple are no longer working members of the royal family, they are still public figures with a high profile.

By appearing to dictate which media they will work with and which they will ignore they, no doubt unintentionally, give succour to the rich and powerful everywhere to use their example as an excuse to attack the media when it suits them, he said.

Murray went on to say that the couple have benefitted from a huge amount of positive coverage for themselves and their philanthropic causes.

They may have been stung by some of the coverage they have not liked, he added.They may disagree strongly with some elements of that coverage and can of course take action to answer any criticism they consider unfair or inaccurate through several channels.

But the answer should never be to attempt to shun individual titles and their millions of readers.

Harry and Meghan officially stepped back from their roles in the royal family on 31 March and are currently residing in Los Angeles, California.

Read the original:
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle accused of censorship over refusal to engage with tabloid media - The Independent

Germany is now notorious for weaponizing the charge of antisemitism in order to silence Palestine solidarity, labelling BDS the peaceful Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israeli violations, as inherently anti-Semitic.

In May last year, the German Bundestag passed a resolution condemning BDS as anti-Semitic, flatly conflating Israel with Jews, thus associating BDS with the Nazi boycott of Jews.

So now, there is a whole brouhaha about the distinguished professor Achille Mbembe, who is booked to speak at the Ruhrtriennale festival in North Rhine-Westphalia. Mbembe is booked to give the opening speech on the 14th of August, titled Reflections on planetary living. He has been supportive of BDS and has made comparisons between South African Apartheid and oppression of Palestinians. Mbembe is a Cameroon-born, South Africa-based historian who lectures around the world, holding an A1 rating from the South African National Research Foundation. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

The attacks against Mbembe appear to have been initiated by Lorenz Deutsch, a local politician with the FDP (Liberal Party), through a letter forwarded and promoted by Dr. Felix Klein, the Federal Government Commissioner for Jewish Life and Against Anti-Semitism. Deutschs letter highlights quotes from Mbembes writing which are supposed to prove his anti-Semitism, and what local as well as Israeli press have concocted to be Holocaust trivialization and Holocaust relativization. Here are the critical Mbembe quotes:

Now, how do you reach from here to antisemitism, Holocaust relativization or Holocaust trivialization? Even in this clinical isolation, the quotations are quite logically formed, and the latter quote even makes a crucial point of distinguishing the Holocaust from South African Apartheid.

The key to charging Mbembe is in the infamous definition of anti-Semitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which has been weaponized internationally to chill critique of Israel. The vague and clumsy definition provides a list of 11 examples of antisemitic speech, seven of which are related to Israel. Among these examples are:

These two examples seem to fall close to the accusations against Mbembe, though they dont really fit them anyway. This definition is not meant to be a perfect fit anyhow the whole point of it is to open up for a general campaign of tarnishing against BDS and critique of Israel in general, as has been the case in the many places, like the US and UK, where in the latter, the definition served as a major asset in the campaign against Jeremy Corbyn.

The attacks against Mbembe appear to have multiple outlets from the local politicians and conservative Jewish leaders to the Jerusalem Post. German cultural festival director urged to be fired for BDS antisemitism, is the title of the latest in a series of articles by Benjamin Weinthal in the Jerusalem Post, a journalist for whom such witch-hunts appear to be a pet project.

Weinthals target is also the festival director, Stefanie Carp. He approvingly cites a German official saying she should be fired because she booked Mbembe. Notice also the pairing BDS antisemitism. This is a linguistic wholesale conflation which leaves absolutely no room for the possibility that BDS is actually a movement concerned with human rights. No, it is simply a sub-form of antisemitism, and thats beyond discussion.

Weinthal cites Uwe Becker, the commissioner of the Hessian federal state government for Jewish life and the fight against antisemitism in Germany, who makes the precise same conflation:

Once again, the director of the Ruhrtriennale Stefanie Carp sets an anti-Israel accent and stages the defamation of the Jewish state in the guise of freedom of art and expression Obviously Ms. Carp not only has a problem with Israel but also deliberately provides a large platform for Israel-related antisemitism. Once again, she is abusing the framework of a publicly funded festival for antisemitic enemy images toward Israel.

Never mind that Carp confirmed that Mbembe, in his Festival speech, will not deal with Israel and the Middle East conflict. His positions are apparently beyond the pale, and Carp has to be fired for even considering to have him speak, about anything.

Weinthal points to Mbembes cardinal sin: That in a forward to a book from 2015 called Apartheid Israel: The Politics of an Analogy, Mbembe wrote that the time has come for global isolation of Israel.

Its a real problem when these conflations of Israel and all Jews are made and you cant talk about Israeli Apartheid without it being taken as an inherent hatred of all Jews.

Even Jews are attacked for these things. Last year, the German Jewish Voice for a Just Peace in the Near East, received a peace prize from the city of Gttingen, which Israel-apologists sought to have cancelled, suggesting these are the wrong kind of Jews. In 2016, after an incitement campaign by the Israeli government and its local supporters, the bank account of the organization was closed. This was in fact the first time in the post-WW2 era, that an account held by a Jewish organization in Germany was closed. It was explicitly explained to them that this was for political reasons if they would rescind their support for BDS, they could reopen the account. Only after a massive protest campaign, were they allowed to reopen the account.

Germany, in this respect, is applying state-sponsored censorship on steroids. The Holocaust guilt, which is actively and admittedly promoted by Israeli diplomats, is serving as a central emotional core from which to enact this censorship, which is meant to protect Israel from critique and condemnation, by tarnishing anyone who ever spoke about its racism, as racist themselves.

H/t Christoph Glanz

Read the rest here:
German censorship campaign targets scholar over BDS and applies 'antisemitism' charge - Mondoweiss

Considering that the federal government has failed in almost every aspect to contain the public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the side effect in territories like Puerto Rico can only be catastrophic.

While it is true that the island was one of the most proactive territories in taking steps to contain the spread of the virus establishing an investigation task force as early as February 29 once the first cases began to be reported, and thanks to the delay in the response from the Centers for Disease Control, no action could prevent the chaos.

With infrastructure still to be rebuilt after Hurricane Maria and the subsequent earthquakes in recent months, the risk of infection and spread of the virus in Puerto Rico is twice as high as in any other state.

The high rates of unemployment and poverty that plague the island, as well as its dependence on public resources for access to health care, have transformed the coronavirus pandemic on the island into an administrative disaster.

According to New York Times figures, and as of April 19, the total number of cases on the island was around 1,220, with 41 deaths, the result of a double count carried out by the territorys Health Department.

The death of a 29-year-old man, the youngest case on record, has sparked a wave of protests in San Juan after it was learned that his family sought help twice at emergency rooms to have the boy tested and treated without response.

The familys accusation coincided with a government announcement of the loss of several pounds of refrigerated food that had rotted after the responsible private company disconnected the refrigerated trailer full of food, that was supposed to be distributed to those in need amid a two-month lockdown to curb coronavirus cases, WHIO reported.

This is completely unacceptable, said Public Safety Director Pedro Janer.

He said that while the government will be reimbursed, the incident is under investigation after the company said it received instructions to disconnect the trailer from an employee of a local emergency management office.

Meanwhile, newly appointed Health Secretary Lorenzo Gonzlez acknowledged during Saturdays press conference that the islands COVID-19 related data is not entirely accurate because some positive cases might have been counted twice, and that the government is working to improve it.

Its imperfect data, but were going to use itbecause its the one we have, he said.

The lack of information is due, in part, to a lack of transparency on the part of the government.

According to The Independent, several local media have accused Puerto Rican authorities of trying to silence the press by banning journalists from attending government briefings on television, thus avoiding exposure of Vzquezs mismanagement.

Apparently, the governor has given direct instructions to prevent press criticism from being publicized due to situations such as the delay in the arrival of COVID-19 testing kits for which the government has allegedly allocated $19 million.

Telemundo Puerto Rico described the move to ban reporters from the briefings as something that not even President Trump would dare to do and said that it cannot in good conscience lend itself to broadcast propagandist programming.

At the same time, the government announced last week the closure of several police stations throughout the island, for fear of exposing officials to the virus.

According to the AP, more than 150 agents of the 11,000 that exist throughout the territory are in quarantine.

Neither police nor health care workers have had access to diagnostic tests, and mayors across the island are working around the clock to contain the crisis in the most populous territory in the United States.

In the central mountainous town of Cayey, Mayor Rolando Ortiz told NBC News that his municipality is not doing tests here because the government has them very limited.

Ive found out about cases here because the people have my phone number and they call me up when they know something, he said in Spanish. It has really been vital to just have direct contact with the people.

Paradoxically, it is precisely the direct contact that makes the crisis worse, and the worst is yet to come in Puerto Rico.

Read the original here:
Censorship, Chaos, and Misinformation: How Puerto Rico Is Battling the Coronavirus Pandemic - BELatina

In Brief

The Ethereum Name Service has released a new feature that allows users to set up a decentralized website within the ENS Manager, its web-based interface. The feature makes it easier than ever to upload and access censorship-resistant content using Ethereum.

ENS Manager now allows content uploadsvia integration with Temporal, an interplanetary file system (IPFS) enterprise platform similar to web server providers such as Amazon Web Services. Unlike centralized AWS servers however, Temporal hooks into IPFS which uses a decentralized protocol across many different data storage nodes. That means no singular authority can delete or block the data stored in the IPFS network. IPFS is also much more resistant to hacking and provides some efficiency improvementsover HTTP protocols.

ENS users formerly were only able to upload small amounts of content to their accountsuch as addresses for non-ETH cryptocurrenciesusing the ENS Manager. Before the integration, ENS users would need to manually upload files to IPFS, then take the resulting hash and add it to their ENS content records.

Now, after uploading website files via Temporal within ENS Manager, users simply save the IPFS hash address to their ENS account. After that, anyone can access the website by appending .link to the end of their ENS addressfor example ethhub.eth.link.

Any kind of website can benefit from the reliability and censorship-resistance of a decentralized website, ENS director of operations Brantly Millegan told Decrypt. As you can see on Almonit (almonit.eth.link), there are all kinds of decentralized websites: personal blogs, games, political websites, even the Bible.

The redundancy of the IPFS protocol also offers enhanced reliability compared to protocols such as HTTP by storing content redundantly, allowing other IPFS nodes to send the requested data if the primary node (chosen based on proximity to the request) is unavailable.

Integrations like the one between ENS and Temporal that streamline the user experience are essential to the widespread adoption of the decentralized, censorship-resistant web.

See original here:
ENS unveils easier way to build decentralized websites on Ethereum - Decrypt