Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Sen. Chris Murphy calls for more Silicon Valley censorship …

Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy thinks removing Infowars was a good first step and says tech giants should censor more content. (murphy.senate.gov)

Sen. Chris Murphy thinks tech giants banning Alex Jones Infowars is a good start, but says the survival of our democracy depends on sites like Facebook and YouTube removing additional content.

Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it, Murphy, D-Conn., tweeted on Monday.

The controversial Jones and his Infowars content were removed from Facebook, YouTube, Apple and Spotify this week. Jonesis a notorious conspiracy theorist who has been widely criticized for polarizing content, including discredited claims about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Many staunch Infowars critics condemned the tech giants decision, noting that censoring him could result in further actions against people who arent accepted by the mainstream media which appears to be exactly what Murphy wants.

Murphy wrote that Facebook and Apple and YouTube have gotten so big they sometimes seem like the government, but reminded his 704,000 followers that the technology giants arent publicly controlled.

They are private companies that shouldnt knowingly spread lies and hate. They took a good first step today by removing Infowars, Murphy wrote.

Murphys Twitter account was filled with negative reaction to his call for additional censorship.

Talk radio host Tony Bruno responded, Thanks for confirming your hatred of the First Amendment Chris. You do realize this is not what Democracy looks like, don't you?

In other words you won't rest until you control the entire message. You won't be happy until you dictate everything we get to hear. I didn't like Jones but you scare me far more, a user said.

Another user added, Youre advocating censorship, how progressive!

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro explained to Murphy, Youre a governmental official and there is a thing called the First Amendment.

Murphy bills himself as a strong voice for job creation, affordable health care, education, stricter gun laws and progressive foreign policy. He has been among the Senates most liberal members and attacks President Trump on a regular basis.

Murphy recently said Trump is waging a very deliberate assault on the American health care system and called for Connecticut to create its own insurance mandate.

Murphy is seeking re-election in November.

Brian Flood covers the media for Fox News. Follow him on Twitter at @briansflood.

Read more:
Sen. Chris Murphy calls for more Silicon Valley censorship ...

Godless Comedy YouTube Censorship – Godless Comedy

Nobodys feelings were consulted during the making of this video. Anyone who has a problem with that can drop dead.

A Word To The Google Feminists on BitChutehttps://www.bitchute.com/video/YA0GQNtI8lQ/

A Word To The Google Feminists on LiveLeakhttps://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e06_1519057581

A Word To The Google Feminists on Vimeohttps://vimeo.com/256448828

A Word To The Google Feminists on PewTubehttps://pewtube.com/user/patcondell/Rftaqvx

German women have had enough. Please share this video widely. #120dbhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJxU8iiyOS0

Restricted by YouTube, A Word To The Criminal Migrant, subtitled in Arabic, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Spanish, Swedishhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9e_vcSut0A

Interview with a woman from the #120db videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QJ3wYi_Fug

A German woman speaks out about the rape of her countryhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itKmpVnAemc

German journalist (part 1): Like many other women in Germany, I no longer feel safe.https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/01/interview-with-a-german-journalist-like-many-other-women-in-germany-i-no-longer-feel-safe/

German journalist (part 2): More and more citizens wake up and realise that something is totally wrong here.https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/02/german-journalist-more-and-more-citizens-wake-up-and-realize-that-something-is-totally-wrong-here/

Afghan rapes 13 year-old girl after being released from prison for attempted rapehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5353915/Afghan-asylum-seeker-18-rapes-girl-13-Germany.html

Anti-rape pants sell out quickly in Germany.https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/02/german-women-in-fear-new-anti-rape-pants-sell-out-very-quickly

Swedish volunteers patrol Malm streets after wave of gang rapeshttps://www.rt.com/news/414083-malmo-rapes-street-patrols/

Swedish police warn women not to go out alone at nighthttps://www.thelocal.se/20160308/backlash-begins-after-swedish-women-told-not-to-go-out-alone

Migrants raped woman in wheelchair. Swedes have had enough.https://acidmuncher.wordpress.com

Nearly half of Swedens women afraid to go out after darkhttp://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/04/scared-sweden-almost-half-of-women-afraid-to-be-out-after-dark-in-europes-rape-capital/

Only 1 in 5 foreign rapists in Sweden deportedhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4302128/Foreigners-not-deported-Sweden-rapes.html

A glimpse into life at Google, a bubble of hysterical bigotry and safe space paranoiahttp://thefederalist.com/2018/01/10/19-insane-tidbits-james-damores-lawsuit-googles-office-environment/

Worker suing Google says the company is dominated by a racist man-hating hate grouphttps://www.theverge.com/2018/1/12/16885560/david-gudeman-james-damore-google-lawsuit-misandrist-liberal-hate-group-accusation

Everyone is free to download this video and post it to their own account if they wish, as long as it is not edited in any way (including the title) and not monetised.

You can download audio versions of all my videos athttp://patcondell.libsyn.com/

Subscribe via iTunes at http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=262679978

Follow me on Gabhttps://gab.ai/patcondell

Twitterhttp://twitter.com/patcondell

Websitehttp://www.patcondell.net

Read more here:
Godless Comedy YouTube Censorship - Godless Comedy

Censorship – Definition, Examples, Cases – Legal Dictionary

The term censorship refers to the suppression, banning, or deletion of speech, writing, or images that are considered to be indecent, obscene, or otherwise objectionable. Censorship becomes a civil rights issue when a government or other entity with authority, suppresses ideas, or the expression of ideas, information, and self. In the U.S., censorship has been debated for decades, as some seek to protect the public from offensive materials, and others seek to protect the publics rights to free speech and expression. To explore this concept, consider the following censorship definition.

Noun

Origin

380 B.C. Greek Philosopher Plato

The word censorship is from the Latin censere, which is to give as ones opinion, to assess. In Roman times, censors were public officials who took census counts, as well as evaluating public principles and moralities. Societies throughout history have taken on the belief that the government is responsible for shaping the characters of individuals, many engaging in censorship to that end.

In his text The Republic, ancient Greek philosopher Plato makes a systematic case for the need for censorship in the arts. Information in the ancient Chinese society was tightly controlled, a practice that persists in some form today. Finally, many churches, including the Roman Catholic Church, have historically banned literature felt to be contrary to the teachings of the church.

Many of Americas laws have their origins in English law. In the 1700s, both countries made it their business to censor speech and writings concerning sedition, which are actions promoting the overthrowing of the government, and blasphemy, which is sacrilege or irreverence toward God. The idea that obscenity should be censored didnt gain serious favor until the mid-1800s. The courts in both countries, throughout history, have worked to suppress speech, writings, and images on these issues.

As time went on, contention arose over just what should be considered obscene. Early English law defined obscenity as anything that tended to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and anything that might suggest to the minds of the young of either sex, and even to persons of more advanced years, thoughts of a most impure and libidinous character. This essentially meant anything that might lead one to have impure thoughts. This definition carried over into early American law as well.

However, that definition was vague enough to raise more questions than it answered in many circumstances. These included:

Censorship in America took a turn in 1957, when the U.S. Supreme Court declared that adults cannot be reduced to reading only what is fit for children, ruling that it must be considered whether the work was originally meant for children or adults. Still, the Court acknowledged that works that are utterly without redeeming social importance can be censored or banned. This left another vague standard for the courts to deal with.

Censorship in America is most commonly a question in the entertainment industry, which is widely influential on the young and old alike. Public entertainment in the form of movies, television, music, and electronic gaming are considered to have a substantial effect on public interest. Because of this, it is subject to certain governmental regulations.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits suppression of an individuals right to free speech, stating Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press This is a principle held dear by those protesting censorship in any form. In the U.S., censorship of obscene materials in entertainment is allowed, in order to protect children from pornography and other offensive things. The problem with government sanctioned censorship is the risk of violating the civil rights of either those producing the materials, or those wishing to view them.

The issue of censorship in the film industry has, at times, been quite contentious. In an effort to avoid the censorship issue, while striving to protect children and conform to federal laws, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) instituted a self-regulating, voluntary rating system in 1968. In the 1990s, the MPAA updated its rating system, making it easier for parents to determine what is appropriate for their children, based on the childrens ages.

The MPAA rating system has a number of ratings:

Rather than censoring movies or their content by exclusion of content, MCAA ratings are assigned by a board of people who view the movies, who consider such factors as violence, sex, drug use, and language when assigning ratings. The board strives to assign a rating that a majority of parents in the U.S. would give, considering their needs to protect their children.

An X rating was part of the MCAAs original rating system, and signified that no one under the age of 16 would be allowed, regardless of parental accompaniment. The X rating was replaced by the NC-17 rating in 1990.

Internet censorship refers to the suppression of information that can be published to, or viewed on, the internet. While many people enjoy unfettered access to the broad spectrum of information racing across the information highway, others are denied access, or allowed access only to government approved information. Rationales for internet censorship range from a desire to protect children from content that is offensive or inappropriate, to a governments objective to control its peoples access to world news, opinions, and other information.

In the United States, the First Amendment affords the people some protection of their right to freely access the internet, and of the things they post to the web. Because of this, there is very little government-mandated filtering of information that originates in the U.S. The issue of censorship of certain content, especially content that may further terrorism, is constantly debated at the federal government level.

As an example of censorship, the following countries are known for censoring their peoples internet content:

In the mid-1960s, Sam Ginsberg, who owned Sams Stationery and Luncheonette on Long Island, was charged with selling girlie magazines to a 16-year old boy, which was in violation of New York state law. Ginsberg was tried in the Nassau County District Court, without a jury, and found guilty. The judge found that the magazines contained pictures which, by failing to cover the female buttocks and breasts with an opaque covering, were harmful to minors. He stated that the photos appealed to the prurient, shameful or morbid interest of minors, and that the images were patently offensive to standards held by the adult community regarding what was suitable for minors.

Ginsberg was denied the right to appeal his convictions to the New York Court of Appeals, at which time he took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court, on the basis that the state of New York had no authority to define two separate classes of people (minors and adults), with respect to what is harmful. In addition, Ginsberg argued that it was easy to mistake a young persons age, and the law makes no requirement for how much effort a shop owner must put into determining age before selling magazines intended for adult viewing. The Court did not agree, holding that Ginsberg might be acquitted on the grounds of an honest mistake, only if he had made a reasonable bonafide attempt to ascertain the true age of such a minor. The conviction was upheld.

View original post here:
Censorship - Definition, Examples, Cases - Legal Dictionary

Censorship | Final Fantasy Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

A "censor" screen added for humor when using Devour in Final Fantasy VIII.

Censorship refers to the suppression of material that may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by governments, media outlets, authorities or other groups or institutions. In video games, things are sometimes censored due to ratings concerns. The Final Fantasy series games have seen some changes from their original versions due to sensitivities towards profanity, religious imagery, sexual imagery and violence and gory content.

The 1990 North American localization was essentially identical to the original Japanese game. Technical limitations, and the censorship policies of Nintendo of America, resulted in a few minor changes to certain elements, however. Nintendo of America policy prohibited games from featuring any overt Judeo-Christian imagery or reference to death. Some graphics were modified so that, for instance, churches, renamed "clinics", no longer featured crosses. This is also probably why the Kill spell was renamed as "Rub".

Following the successful release of the original Final Fantasy by Nintendo in 1990, Square Soft, Square's North American subsidiary, began work on an English language localization of Final Fantasy II. Although a beta version was produced, and the game was advertised in several Square Soft trade publications, the age of the original Japanese game and the arrival of the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, the NES's successor console, led Square Soft to cancel work on the Final Fantasy II localization in favor of the recently released Final Fantasy IV (which, to avoid confusing North American gamers, was retitled Final Fantasy II).

Even at the prototype stage changes had been made from the original version due to the religious imagery policies Nintendo had at the time: The Star of David used in a dungeon design was replaced with a triangle, and the cross that replaces a character's face on the pause screen at death was replaced with a gravestone.

In one cutscene in the original version, Rosa is rescued at the last moment from being executed by a giant scythe. The scythe was replaced with a giant metal ball in the North American version. Religious imagery was removed, such as "Holy" being renamed "White" (though one use of the word "Holy" was used by the Elder of Mysidia as he instructs Cecil on how to be a Paladin). The Tower of Prayers in Mysidia was renamed the Tower of Wishes (though one instance of "pray" was still left in, uttered by the Black Mage in the tower). Textual edits removed references to death and violence, partially to adhere to Nintendo's family friendly content guidelines.

In the original Japanese SNES release, the dancing dirl that appears in pubs removes her red dress to reveal a bikini underneath before dancing and getting dressed again. The segment of her undressing was censored out of the original North American release. It was restored in the Game Boy Advance release, but was again censored in the North American and European version for the PlayStation Portable.

The artworks of Rydia, Porom, and Ursula have been altered to be less revealing for the overseas releases.

The sprite of the boss Melusine was changed for the remastered version, depicting her with the less revealing clothes seen in Amano's artwork ().

The final bosses showing censorship (JP/NA).

In the original North American SNES version the spell Holy was renamed "Pearl", the summon "Jihad" was renamed to "Crusader", and Hell's Rider to "Rider". Many sprites were also censored. Overly revealing sprites, such as Siren, Lakshmi (Starlet), Alluring Rider (Critic), Chadarnook (woman), Goddess, Power (Hit), Magic, Lady (Girl), and another untargettable part on the final boss, were censored. The smoke for Misty and her palette-swaps were removed. Pub signs were changed to cafe signs. The PlayStation version uses all uncensored sprites from the original Japanese release. Siren sprite was re-censored in the localized GBA versions, but not as much as in the SNES release. Chadarnook Goddess sprite was also re-censored for the localized GBA, censoring the same areas but is not the same as the SNES sprite.

Kefka's line when the party ran away from him on chocobos was censored. In the Japanese version he says "", literally translated to "Arggg.... you scums! I will definitely pay you back for this!". In the overseas release, depending on the version, he either says "Son of a submariner! They'll pay for this..." (SNES/PSX version) or "Son of a sandworm! You'll pay for this..." (GBA/PC/iOS).

During the scene where Locke sees Celes imprisoned in South Figaro, she is no longer being beaten by the guards in the GBA version, and they merely taunt her. The censoring of Celes's beating isn't from the localization; this was also present in the Japanese Advance version. The scene where Celes is being tortured by the Gestahlian Empire was removed because the original Final Fantasy VI was created before the Japanese ratings board, CERO, existed. Violence is rated strictly in Japan, and Square wanted a CERO A rating for the Game Boy Advance version, which would have been impossible if a game depicts violence against a restrained human.[1]

The conversation between Edgar and Relm during their first meeting in Thamasa was censored. In the Japanese version, after Edgar learned about Relm's age (10), he said to himself: "I need to get a hold of myself... or it's going to be a crime". In the English versions, Edgar says: "Not even a lady yet. Here's hoping you're still around in eight years, kid". In the Japanese versions, Relm used harsh language, especially for someone her age. The overseas versions toned down the dialogue so that, while still biting, her words are overall clean.

Final Fantasy VII employs some self-censorship. The concept art for Corel Prison shows the billboard for Shinra Electric Power Company spray-painted over with the word "Fuck". In the final game, the word is further painted over turning it into "Pyck". The brothel Honey Bee Inn also initially had more content, but these were removed early, their remains only existing as dummied content in the original Japanese version.

Cloud Strife, Cid Highwind and Barret Wallace's use of the word "shit" and Tifa Lockhart's use of the word "Wench" was censored for the PC version, turning it into symbols, although one instance of it was missed: if the player examines the blue lights in the Forgotten Capital with Cid as party leader, his reaction still uses the word even in the PC versions.

The Minerva statue seen in the Banora Underground was redesigned from the Japanese version for its English release, as the original model was deemed to resemble depictions of the Virgin Mary.

In the original Japanese version, the boss Gerogero's organs were red. The change to blue for the localized versions was probably made because the red makes the organs protruding from the creature look far more real. The red version of Gerogero can also be seen in both the BradyGames and Piggyback Interactive official strategy guides for Final Fantasy VIII.

The Ultimecia Castle's armory originally had red blood on the wall, but in the localized versions it has turned green.

The weapon Selphie wields is called nunchaku in the NTSC versions and "shinobou" in the PAL version, due to nunchaku's status as an illegal weapon in the UK.

When the player uses the Devour command they get a "Censored...please stand by" message while eating sounds play on the background. Nothing is actually censored; the scene is in every version of the game and is included for humor.

The scene where Penelo is held hostage is censored from the Japanese version.

The scene where Penelo is tied up in Ba'Gamnan's Lhusu Mines hideout was cut from the original Japanese version of the game to get a lower rating. Producer Akitoshi Kawazu has explained the decision to do this thusly: "[...] at the time right before the Japanese release there were various incidents in the real world which...basically there were some similarities there that would have made it a difficult thing to release at the lower age rating that we wanted."[2]

This is a rare case of a Final Fantasy game being censored for Japan, but not for overseas versions. The "incidents in the real world" Kawazu refers to, but does not specify, may refer to Tsutomu Miyazaki, a Japanese serial killer who abducted and murdered four young girls in Saitama and Tokyo Prefectures from August 1988 to June 1989. His death sentence was upheld by the Japanese supreme court in January 2006, two months before Final Fantasy XII came out.

Comparison of the Shiva models.

The Chinese version has an altered model for Shiva with a skin-tight shiny outfit rather than appearing almost nude, and less pale skin. Skeletons and liches were also altered for the Chinese version.

Early material for Final Fantasy Versus XIII had the kingdom of Lucis worship the Grim Reaper more prominently. This was toned down when the game became Final Fantasy XV due to ratings concerns in certain countries.

Prompto Argentum's vest had a tag that read "It's a beautiful day now watch some bastard fuck it up" in the earlier renders for his character, and in the Final Fantasy XV Episode Duscae demo. This is an actual tag available from the clothing company Roen that collaborated to design the main cast's outfits for the game. In the final game the message is changed to "It's a beautiful day now watch some bastard mess it up", although in the Windows Edition it still says "fuck it up" in the highest settings.

The Chadarnook enemy is based on the enemy of the same name from Final Fantasy VI, and is largely similar in appearance as a nude woman with clouds covering her privates. It is the target of a quest from Vyv Dorden, who tasks the party with photographing the famous daemon for his magazine. When he receives the photograph, he remarks that the picture is too risqu for his magazine, lampshading the enemy's previous censorship in VI.

In the bestiary, the 3D models of Shiva, Chadarnook and Melusine are locked from free-rotation, unlike other creature models. In the Dossiers, it is possible to rotate and zoom in on the male characters but not the female ones.

In the HD version, Kazusa's swimsuit model and Emina's lingerie model were removed from the Historical Personae. They were viewable as alternate outfits in the Rubicus after completing the characters' sidequests in the PlayStation Portable version.

The final battle with Wiegraf Folles is different depending on the version played. Ramza Beoulve and Wiegraf converse numerous times, but a line that is missing in Final Fantasy Tactics: War of the Lions port is Wiegraf stating how religion is perceived in the world in response to Ramza calling him a hypocrite for taking the sides that he has. This was likely removed as it might be offensive to people in the newer version.

In the Japanese version, a scene at the beginning of the game was modified for the English release. In real life, the death of his wife, Remedi, caused Cid to fall into a drunk stupor. His depression was downplayed in the English version of the game, where Mewt and his friends catch him cringing before his superiors at work.

The Holy spell was censored to White.

The magic circle in Wendel was a hexagram (Star of David) in the original Japanese version. It was changed to an octagram for the North American and European versions. Also, Sumo and Amanda were looking for Medusa's blood, not her tears.

God was changed to Creator due to the Video Game Content Guidelines set by Nintendo of America.

On Edo World, the bananas mentioned in the story were originally opium in the Japanese version.

The word Holy was censored to White; this affects the white magic Holy and the Holy Lance. The Holy Swords were renamed to Mystic Swords.

The western release has been modified with characters' outfits made less revealing and some outfits being completely removed from the game. Some characters have been aged a couple years compared to the Japanese game. Airy's third boss form is more revealing in the Japanese version.

The character Aimee Matchlock who has a Native American-themed job class and outfit, had her job title and outfit altered to a cowboy theme in the overseas releases. Magnolia Arch's Planeswarden Garb had a white line placed through the outfit's slit in the overseas releases. Bonsoir Bunny and Bravo Bunny's stomach holes were filled in and the thighs were covered. The Eastern War Garb's bottom half was covered up with a toga.

The Signet artworks for many female summons have been altered to be less revealing in the localization of Final Fantasy Dimensions II. Examples include Sylph's default appearance being changed into a leotard and stockings being added to the Mind Flayer summon.

Wol was designed with a lightweight costume for his initial "Onion Knight" gear, seeing that it was intended as a "bare bones" job. In response to player feedback, however, the design was changed to cover up more.[3]

Japanese (left) and Global (right).

One of Kefka's stickers was censored in the global version. The texts in the image of "Chikushou!" (!, damn it!) sticker was changed to "Son of a sub!". However, since the game shares the same voice overs with the Japanese version, the bad word can still be heard. The Japanese sticker can also be considered censored as well, since it's not exactly what Kefka said in Final Fantasy VI script (kusso, ). Despite being a foul language, "chikushou" means "damn it", while "kusso" on the other hand have various meanings including "damn it", "scum", and "shit". The voice actor also voiced this sticker as "Chikushaaaaa!" instead of saying the word directly.

See the article here:
Censorship | Final Fantasy Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia

Why Facebook Failed Our Censorship Test | Electronic …

If you click around Facebooks Government Request Report, youll notice that, for many countries, Facebook enumerates the number of content restrictions the company has fulfilled. This is a sanitized term for censorship.

For example, Facebook restricted access to three items of content on its site to comply with Brazilian court orders. Facebook restricted access to 15 pieces of content to comply with Israeli laws banning Holocaust denial. Facebook restricted access to 3,624 pieces of content in Turkey and another 5,832 pieces of content in India, all under a variety of nefarious censorship laws.

But if you click over to the United States, Facebooks home country, youll find that the content restrictions category is conspicuously missing.

This is odd, considering that Facebook has been suspending the accounts of inmates in the U.S. for at least four years at the behest of prison officials. Facebook even had an easy and confidential Inmate Takedown form corrections officers could fill out to make the profiles disappear.

We know for a fact that Facebook processed 74 requests for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation alone in 2014. Between California and the state of South Carolina, we also know Facebook processed more than 700 takedown requests over the last four years. We could file public records requests in all 50 states to learn more, but since Facebooks system allowed prisons to file these requests without creating a paper trail, only Facebook knows how many requests it has complied with nationwide. We believe it may reach into thousands.

In direct response to Facebooks secrecy, as well as inconsistencies in Facebooks explanations of the takedown process, we have added a new category to Who Has Your Back?, our annual scorecard that evaluates how companies handle government requests. To earn a star in the category for Disclosing Government Content Removal Requests, companies do not have to reject government requests, but just be transparent about how they handle these requests.

As we write in the report, Twitters transparency report is a particularly good example; not only does the company produce the data, but it publishes an interactive map that users can explore to review details about content removal requests. Google also provides data about government requests to remove content, including dozens of examples with information on the nature of the request and the outcome.

Facebook is somewhat unique when it comes to prisoner takedown requests. Based on information we have received through public records requests filed in several states, inmates are more often caught using Facebook than any other service. But this isnt just about prisoner accounts. The fact that Facebook has not been reporting these takedown requests raises larger questions about what other kinds of censorship Facebook has been hiding.

In its report, Google gave examples in the U.S., such as a request from a law enforcement officer asking the company to remove a link to a negative news story from its search results and a request from a government agency to remove an allegedly defamatory video about a school administrator. (Google complied with neither request, but included both in its transparency report.)

If Google received requests to takedown this kind of content, then we believe it is highly likely that Facebook has received them as well. In the coming months, we may even see more direct evidence of this through crowdsourced reports at OnlineCensorship.org, an alpha-stage project co-founded by EFF Director for International Freedom of Expression Jillian York.

In preparing 2015s Who Has Your Back? report we gave Facebook multiple opportunities to come clean about government requests to suppress content. Although the company did overhaul its inmate takedown process, it still refuses to release top line numbers for the United States.

Its too late for Facebook to earn a star in this category for 2015, but theres still time for Facebook to establish trust with its users. We urge Facebook to publish the data and show U.S. government agencies that censorship shouldnt happen in the dark.

See original here:
Why Facebook Failed Our Censorship Test | Electronic ...