Mediaboss Marketing

Twitter and YouTube have censored AYTU BioScience, a publicly-traded Colorado-based pharmaceutical company, after it promoted ultraviolet (UV) light developed in conjunction with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center as a potential treatment for the Chinese virus. Twitter later reversed its censorship, saying the companys account was mistakenly caught in a spam filter.

AYTU is publicly traded on the NASDAQ index. In its research on UV light treatment for the coronavirus, it is working with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, a major hospital in Los Angeles. The hospital was founded in 1902 and employs over 2,000 physicians.

More information about the Healight UV Light treatment being researched by AYTU and Cedars-Sinai can be found on the latters website.

UV light has recently been discussed by President Donald Trump as a potential treatment for the coronavirus, leading to a slew of articles from the mainstream media condemning his comments as dangerous.

For example, theNew York Timesrecently published a piece titled Trump Muses About Light as Remedy, but Also Disinfectant, Which Is Dangerous. The article highlights the links between UV light, a natural byproduct of sunlight that is also used in indoor tanning facilities, and skin cancer. Business Insider quoted experts who called Trumps UV light comments exceedingly dangerous, while NBC News suggested the treatment is being pushed by conspiracy theorists.

YouTube and Twitter both took down material from AYTU BioScience, a pharmaceutical company that is investigating UV light treatment as a potential treatment for Wuhan coronavirus. Twitter briefly banned AYTUs official account, while YouTube has taken down a video from the company about UV light treatment.

Twitter later reversed its censorship and reinstated AYTUs account. A Twitter spokeswoman said the account had been mistakenly banned after it was caught in a spam filter, and that this has now been reversed.

AYTUs video about UV treatment remains banned on YouTube. It was taken down by the Google-owned company afterNew York Timesreporter David Alba reached out to the tech giant.

Attempts to access the video now return a message saying the video has been banned for violating YouTubes community guidelines.

Google has yet to return Breitbart News request for comment about the videos removal. Breitbart News also requested comment from AYTU Bioscience but did not receive a response before publishing.

Are you an insider at Google, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, or any other tech company who wants to confidentially reveal wrongdoing or political bias at your company? Reach out to Allum Bokhari at his secure email addressallumbokhari@protonmail.com.

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News.

Read this article:
YouTube and Twitter Censor Pharma Company Researching UV Light Treatment for Chinese Virus - Breitbart

There are so many quotes to choose from to express ourselves in this, or any other time of great turmoil, authored by our long-time friend, George Orwell.

We all probably know by now that oppressors of free-thinking people will eagerly try to mess up with their perception of reality, hoping to make slavery look like freedom, ignorance like strength, and of course, war like peace.

Theres another quote that may hit you even worse or better as your overall experience of slavery, ignorance, and war may be: In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

In any case, thats one of the slogans attributed to Orwell, that his fellow-citizens, London Real, are now using to promote their media outlet thats suddenly come under considerable Big Tech pressure.

And if you thought London Reals sentiment was purely drawing from the local experience, think again: the overarching message here is that from the Gettysburg Address, about a government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Democracy, in a word.

The UK-based website and its founder, Brian Rose, have announced their own way to getting there: a new digital freedom platform that will livestream content major Silicon Valley giants, such as YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, no longer allow.

The whole thing was set in motion recently when in the midst of uncertainty, fear, and censorship surrounding the coronavirus pandemic the outlet aired a now-infamous interview with David Icke that got hammered with bans on mainstream social media.

Its not about whether or not you agree with a point of view, London Real argues its about whether you think unique and informed voices should be allowed to be heard at all.

This platform believes the latter to be the case, and appear to find themselves somewhat perplexed at coming under attack nine years into providing content that never attracted so much attention from censors before.

We dont believe you need to be told what you can (and cant) watch and we are firm proponents of the principles of free speech and freedom of the press, they say.

Visit link:
London Real to build new Digital Freedom platform to avoid Big Tech censorship after David Icke interview - Reclaim The Net

John Billheimer takes a look at how filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock was impacted by the Production Code Administration in Hitchcock and the Censors.

Its been nearly a year since University Press of Kentucky released this book in their Screen Classics series. If you have any interest in classic movies, you certainly cant go wrong with these books. Anyway, this review is going online over a week after I finished reading my sixth quarantine book. The main reason for this is that April 29 marks the 40th anniversary since the Master of Suspense passed away. Theres no better way than to celebrate his genius on screen.

It may be hard to imagine it right now but believe it or not, there was a time when censors decided what you can and cant watch. Unfair as this may be, those were the rules that impacted Hollywood from 1934 to 1968. Before coming to America to film Rebecca for David Selznick, Hitchcock made films in England. While these films were subject to the British Board of Film Censors, only the finish product was impacted by the Joseph Breen and his Production Code cohorts.

HItchcock was happy to excise dialogue but what was most important in his mind were the visual images. For instance, lets take a look at Psycho. The shower scene is one of the most iconic scenes in cinematic history. And yet, there was only one cut in the segment that was asked to be removed. Not surprisingly, it was the nudity as the camera pans out following Marion Cranes murder.

More than anything, John Billheimers book provides fascinating insight into the Codes views. Bathrooms were prohibited! Maybe its just me but it feels like this is something that still stands today. Well, you still see actors doing makeup and such but it still fares rare to watch someone actually go to the restroom in movies. Regardless, the book goes into isnt allowed during this time period.

Billheimer writes the book in parts. First, there is his early career making films in Britain. However, most records didnt survive because of World War 2. From there, its on to the David Selznick years, a brief Transatlantic period, Warner Bros., the Glory Years, Television, and finally, a conclusion. The book movies by at a quick pace provided you arent distracted.

All in all, Hitchcock and the Censors will make for a solid addition to anyones book collection on classic film.

Related

See more here:
Hitchcock and the Censors by John Billheimer - Solzy at the Movies

Bella Hadid and their burning photographs that challenge the CENSORSHIP of Instagram

Bella Hadidrecognized model of american origin, has wanted to make more enjoyable the quarantine of her 29.9 million followers on Instagram with the publication of hot photos where boasts the spectacular body that has not bothered to challenge the strict censorship of the platform.

So it is not surprising that the name of this beautiful model 23 years of age becomes constantly trend of the social networksas it is well known that it enjoys a great popularity at international level since he was named as the most beautiful woman in the world.

And through their social networks Bella Hadid has been in charge of defending this quoted title to the share hot photos that without a doubt, elevate the temperature to its maximum level and in these times of quarantine has not been the exception, because its contents every time is more near to challenge the strict censorship of Instagram.

Bella Hadid and their burning photographs that challenge the CENSORSHIP of Instagram.

Bella Hadid wanted to consent to all their loyal fans sharing in his account of Instagram a cute photo session that you made from the inside of your house, and in which wastes fed up sensuality to posing before the camera with tiny attire, that leave nothing to the imagination of the knights.

The funny thing about this photoshoot is that the famous model has given up all luxuries in order to portray a simple version of herself as I see her posing without much make-up, the best thing of all is that there are some images where it has been stripped of all clothing to expose their exquisite attributes.

You may be interested: Bella Hadid raised the temperature on Instagram with notched micro bikini

But that is not all since Bella Hadid he has also shared a short video on his profile, where he appears sitting in the living room of her house wearing her sexy figure with a tiny short, which combined with a transparent blue that it almost makes you show your naked breasts to the camera.

Photos: Instagram

See the original post here:
Bella Hadid and their burning photographs that challenge the CENSORSHIP of Instagram - OI Canadian

Covid-19 is wreaking havoc around the world. The daily number of infected and dead keeps climbing. As I look out my window, I am not sure that things will ever fully return to the way they were before the pandemic. But press freedom and the truth should not be among the casualties.

Late last week, Human Rights Watch warned in a report that while Beijing is attempting to censor and suppress news and facts about Covid-19, there is a real threat of the disease making a comeback in China.

The censorship itself goes back to the start of the outbreak, when Beijing suppressed news reports from doctors in Wuhan about the new, and spreading, disease. Experts in the West have also been questioning the numbers of sick and dead from Covid-19 in China, believing that Beijing is drastically downplaying the total numbers.

On top of this, there have also been numerous stories of how Beijing is trying to re-write the history of the disease.

This all works together to change the narrative of the disease to make the government in Beijing look more favourable. In a report by Reporters Without Borders, China ranked 177th out of 180 countries in the world in press freedom, while Hong Kong dropped seven places to 80th because of its treatment of journalists during pro-democracy demonstrations.

Unfortunately, none of this should be a real surprise to those familiar with press freedom in China, and I have written on this topic before.

But attempts at censorship, suppression and re-writing history are not just coming from Beijing. In a report from the Committee to Protect Journalists titled The Trump Administration and the Media, President Trumps attacks on the news media are seen as having dangerously undermined truth.

President Trumps history of labeling stories he doesnt like as fake news, belittling reporters who question his past statements in comparison with what he says today, and his penchant to state untruths with impunity, as Columbia Journalism Review digital media reporter Matthew Ingram wrote, are very dangerous to journalism and journalists not just in the United States but around the globe.

In the Committee to Protect Journalists report, former White House communications director Michael Dubke is quoted as saying What concerns me is that authoritarian leaders who had already placed restrictions on their press are using President Trumps words to justify what they are doing.

Also quoted in the report is a speech given at Brown University in September 2019, by the publisher of the New York Times, Arthur Sulzberger: In attacking American media, President Trump has done more than undermine his own citizens faith in the news organisations attempting to hold him accountable. He has effectively given foreign leaders permission to do the same with their countries journalists and given them the vocabulary with which to do it.

The rise of Covid-19 on top of these trends from Washington and Beijing is only making the situation for journalists that much harder, and more dangerous. Around the world, government leaders are using the outbreak of Covid-19 along with their now emboldened stance against journalists, both to instil mistrust in news organisations and to crack down on press freedom.

The Committee to Protect Journalists has also been cataloguing these issues as well.

And that is not all of the cases the Committee to Protect Journalists has tracked.

Individually, each of these instances is a flagrant attempt to silence journalists in the countries where they occurred. Taken together they show the full scale of governments use of the outbreak of Covid-19 as cover while they crack down on press freedom, knowing that while the world is preoccupied with the pandemic these incidents are likely to draw less scrutiny.

Howard Chapnick, the former president of the Black Star Photo Agency, titled his 1994 book about photojournalism Truth Needs No Ally. But things are very different now than they were in 1994.

Clearly in this day and age truth does need an ally, and it is the community of journalists around the world who pay the price for being that ally. But how much higher that price will become for both the journalists, and those harmed by not knowing the truth, remains to be seen.

Visit link:
During a worldwide crackdown on press freedom, the truth needs an ally - Hong Kong Free Press