Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

An Argument for Free Speech, the Lifeblood of Democracy – Tufts Now

You devote the first part of the book to Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and his journey into skepticism about universal morality. To whom is that relevant today?

Many of todays students have a keen thirst for social justice, which I admire. When Holmes was their age, he shared that thirst, dropping out of college to enlist in the Union Army in a war against slavery, in which he was nearly killed several times.

He became very skeptical of people who believe they have unique access to universal, absolute truth, who view their adversaries as evil incarnate. That, he believed, leads ultimately to violence.

All of us today need to approach public debate with a bit of humility, recognizing that none of us is infallible and that rigid moral certitude leads down a dangerous path.

We know from centuries of experience, in many countries, that censorship inevitably backfires. It discredits the censors, who are seen as patronizing elites. It demeans listeners who are told they cant handle the truth. It makes martyrs and heroes out of the censored and drives their speech underground where its harder to rebut.

Suffragettes, civil rights leaders, and LGBTQ+ activists all have relied on free speech to get their messages out. Censorship alienates the public, generates distrust, fosters social division, and sparks political instability.

Its not that some speech isnt harmfulits that trying to suppress it causes greater harm.

Not all hateful speech is protected. Incitement to violence, fighting words, defamation, and true threats are all often hateful yet that speech is not protected. But other hateful speech is protected, for several reasons.

Hatred is a viewpoint. Its for the individual to think and feel as he or she wishes; its only when the individual crosses the line between thought and action to incite violence or defame or threaten someone that the state can intervene.

Hate speech laws are also invariably vague and overbroad, leading to arbitrary and abusive enforcement. In the real world, speech rarely gets punished because it hurts dominant majorities. It gets punished because it hurts disadvantaged minorities.

The ultimate problem with banning falsehoods is that to do so youd need an official Ministry of Truth, which could come up with an endless list of officially banned falsehoods. Not only would that list inevitably be self-serving, but it could be wrong.

Even when it comes to clear falsehoods, there are reasons to leave them up. [Former President Donald] Trump claimed, for example, that the size of the crowd at his inauguration was larger than [former President Barack] Obamas, which was indisputably false. But the statement had the effect of calling into question not only Trumps veracity but also his mental soundness, which is important for voters to assess.

They were wrong to apply a norm of international human rights law in banning hima supposed prohibition against glorifying violence. Thats a vague, overly broad standard that can pick up everything from praising Medal of Honor winners to producing Top Gun.

Were dealing here with an American president speaking from the White House to the American people, so I say the proper standard should have been the U.S. First Amendment and whether Trump intended to incite imminent violence and whether that violence was likely. Under that test, I think its a close case.

Justice Louis Brandeis [who served on the Supreme Court from 1916 to 1939] said that the fitting remedy for evil counsels is good ones.

If someone counsels drinking bleach to cure COVID, the remedy is not to suppress itits to point out why thats wrong. But over and over, the governments remedy for speech it didnt like was to strongarm social media platforms to take it down.

The government wouldnt have lost so much credibility if it had only said, This is our best guess based on available evidence. Instead, it spoke ex cathedra on masks, lockdowns, school closings, vaccine efficacy, infection rates, myocarditis, social distancing, you name itclaims that often turned out to be untenableand then it bullied the platforms to censor prominent experts who took issue with its misinformation.

The remedy for falsehoods is more speech, not enforced silence. If someone thinks a social media post contains altered imagery or audio, the initial solution is simply to say that and let the marketplace of ideas sort it out.

Obviously counter-speech isnt always the answer: You still run into eleventh-hour deep fakes that theres no time to rebut. People do have privacy rights and interference with elections undercuts democracy.

The trick is to write legislation that catches malign fakery but doesnt also pick up satire and humor that is obviously bogus. Thats not easy. Well-intended but sloppy laws often trigger serious unintended consequences.

See the article here:
An Argument for Free Speech, the Lifeblood of Democracy - Tufts Now

Metropolis Public Library Director responds to censorship controversyY – The Southern

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

See original here:
Metropolis Public Library Director responds to censorship controversyY - The Southern

The Kids Online Safety Act will censor student journalists – Freedom of the Press Foundation

Today is Student Press Freedom Day, the annual celebration of student journalists contributions to their schools and communities. Student reporters work hard to persist in the face of increasing threats to the First Amendment rights, such as school administrators censoring their reporting and shutting down entire student newspapers.

In this climate, the last thing student journalists need is Congress piling on. But thats exactly what Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Marsha Blackburn have done with their newly revised version of the Kids Online Safety Act.

Weve written before about how KOSA is a wolf in sheeps clothing: Its a censorship bill hidden behind the mantle of child protection. KOSA has been consistently opposed by LGBTQ+, human rights, and civil liberties organizations because of the threat it poses to the privacy, free expression, and safety of young people.

Last week, in response to the drumbeat of criticism that has dogged the bill for more than two years, Blumenthal and Blackburn unveiled a revised version that they claim solves the bills problems. It doesnt.

Although the revised KOSA now appears to focus on design features of online platforms, what remains is the dangerous duty of care provision that requires platforms to take steps to prevent and mitigate those under the age of 17 from being exposed to harmful content through their design features.

As the advocacy group Fight for the Future explains, platforms will still respond to this new version of KOSA by aggressively filtering and suppressing controversial content.

For this reason, KOSA will still censor the news for everyone. But ironically, for a law thats supposed to protect kids, it may harm student journalists in three ways: one, by making it harder for them to find information online for their reporting; two, by censoring their news stories online; and three, by invading the privacy of student journalists, as well as everyone else.

Stymying student journalists from gathering information on social media

First, KOSA will make it harder for high school journalists to gather information on social media for their reporting. For example, the bill explicitly names information about suicidal behavior as harmful to kids. That means online platforms are likely to respond to KOSA by blocking content that discusses suicide from users under the age of 17, so that a design feature such as a recommendation system doesnt recommend that content to children.

If high school journalists want to report on the issue of teen suicide, they may struggle to find any information about it on social media, including information about suicide prevention or news reports.

The same is true for student journalists who want to report about other issues that students deal with every day: eating disorders (specifically flagged as harmful by KOSA), violence against LGBTQ+ kids (could cause anxiety, forbidden by KOSA), or even climate change (too depressing, also disallowed by the bill).

Censoring student journalists reporting

Second, for years, the student press has been using social media to reach audiences. But because KOSA will cause platforms to filter or even remove content that they fear the government will consider harmful to kids, high school journalists may also find their reporting censored on social media as a result of the legislation.

That means that young people may be blocked on social media from seeing the news reporting done by their classmates. For example, platforms may filter or delete student journalists news reports on sexual harassment or abuse of students because they relate to sexual exploitation and abuse of minors, which KOSA specifically identifies as harmful content.

Undermining privacy for all

Third, KOSA is also a privacy disaster for student journalists and everyone else. As Mike Masnick at Techdirt has explained, [N]othing in this bill works unless websites embrace age verification. To implement KOSAs requirement to protect minors, online platforms will have to age-verify users. And the only way to do that is to collect way more information on them, which puts their privacy at risk, Masnick explains.

Age verification will require online platforms to collect more information on all users, not just young people, meaning that everyones privacy will suffer. But its particularly pernicious for a childrens privacy bill to require minors to turn over sensitive information to the very platforms that are accused of harming them by mining their data in the first place.

Teaching kids that its OK, or even required, to reveal sensitive information online also sends a dangerous message, especially to student journalists. Professional reporters must take their online privacy seriously to avoid government surveillance and harassment. We should be teaching student journalists to do the same, not legally requiring them to identify themselves to online platforms so they can be age-verified.

Lawmakers shouldnt be asking student journalists or any young people to sacrifice their freedom of speech and privacy to protect them online. Lets celebrate Student Press Freedom Day by telling Congress not to censor the student press online. Tell Congress not to pass KOSA.

Original post:
The Kids Online Safety Act will censor student journalists - Freedom of the Press Foundation

Bills clarify that parental notice not meant to censor books – Richmond Times-Dispatch

Legislation to ensure that a 2022 law requiring parental notification of explicit instructional materials in public schools is not used to censor books appears to be heading to Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

The House of Delegates has now passed both its own version and a Senate version of the legislation.

The 2022 law included an enactment clause language that specified that it should not be construed as requiring or providing for the censoring of books in public elementary and secondary schools. But some school boards have citedthe law when banning booksover the past year.

Last fall, a Hanover High School student placed Banned Book Nooks at two locations in the county, this one being at We Think In Ink in Ashland.

Senate Bill 235, sponsored by Sen. Ghazala Hashmi, D-Chesterfield, which passed the House on Monday on a vote of 53-46, would put that language from the enactment clause into the law.

Sen. Ghazala Hashmi, D-Chesterfield, seen here in 2020, sponsored the Senate version of the parental notification bill that cleared the House of Delegates on Monday.

Hashmi's measure previously passed the Senate 22-18 as Sen. David Suetterlein, R-Roanoke County, joined the 21 Democrats in supporting the measure.

With the bill having now cleared both chambers, the similar House Bill 571, sponsored by Del. Karrie Delaney, D-Fairfax,could likely clearthe Senate as well.

The lawmaker who carried the 2022 measure, then-Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant, R-Henrico, said last fall that censorship was not the intent of her bill, which gave parents the right to opt their children out of reading sexually explicit content.

Gov. Glenn Youngkin and state Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant, R-Henrico, listen to attendees during a Parents Matter town hall meeting at Crestview Elementary School on Aug. 8. Dunnavant, the lawmaker who carried the 2022 parental notification measure, said last fall that censorship was not the intent of her bill, which gave parents the right to opt their children out of reading sexually explicit content.

Dunnavant's bill said each school board had to adopt policies by Jan. 1, 2023, to ensure parental notification about sexually explicit materials and to provide nonexplicit material as an alternative.

Pointing to that enactment clause that said the measure was not to be used to censor books in schools, Dunnavant said anyone who thinks the measure can be used in that way, needs to go read the bill.

Hashmi and Delaney have said that adding that language into the code will help prevent the law Dunnavant sponsored from being used incorrectly.

While Dunnavant stressed that censorship was not the intention of her bill, some school boards subsequently removed books from school libraries. Hanover, Spotsylvania and Madison counties have been hotspots for controversial book removals in Virginia schools.

The Hanover County School Board voted in June to rewrite its policy concerning which books are allowed in school libraries and then immediately moved to remove copies of 19 books. The policy gives the School Board sole discretion and authority to remove any books from school libraries with a majority vote.

In November, the administration of Hanover Public Schools ordered the removal of 75 book titles from school libraries, including The Handmaids Tale and Slaughterhouse Five, asserting they are sexually explicit.

Some parents and Republican lawmakers have urged the General Assembly to oppose Hashmi and Delaneys bills.

Last week, The Family Foundation hosted a group of parents and children at the state Capitol for a news conference to stress support and opposition of various bills relating to parental input in public education.

The organization's president, Victoria Cobb, accused Democrats of putting censorship into code in order to have a chilling effect on parents who oppose explicit reading materials being available to their children. Del. Nick Freitas, R-Culpeper, joined the group to support its statements.

Ahead of the vote on Hashmi's bill in the House, Freitas asked if the bill would prevent parents from having input on some books being removed from school libraries.

"I would hope that we could all agree that there are some materials that, regardless of what an individual parent may want, they have no business being in a public school library," Freitas said.

Delaney assured the room that "every school district in this commonwealth has a pathway" for removing books.

"What this bill does, and simply the only thing that this bill does, is it prohibits the policies that were created for parental notification to be used for the reason why books can be removed from schools," Delaney said.

In 1473, astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus was born in Torun, Poland.

In 1878, Thomas Edison received a U.S. patent for an improvement in phonograph or speaking machines.

In 1942, during World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066, which paved the way for the relocation and internment of people of Japanese ancestry, including U.S.-born citizens.

In 1976, President Gerald R. Ford, calling the issuing of the internment order for people of Japanese ancestry in 1942 a sad day in American history, signed a proclamation formally confirming its termination.

In 1997, Deng Xiaoping (dung shah-oh-ping), the last of Chinas major Communist revolutionaries, died at age 92.

On Feb. 19, 2008, an ailing Fidel Castro resigned the Cuban presidency after nearly a half-century in power; his brother Raul was later named to succeed him.

Anthony Davis had an All-Star Game for the record books, scoring 52 points as the Western Conference beat the Eastern Conference 192-182 the highest-scoring game in league history.

Three former elite U.S. gymnasts, including 2000 Olympian Jamie Dantzscher, appeared on CBS 60 Minutes to say they were sexually abused by Dr. Larry Nassar, a volunteer team physician for USA Gymnastics.

President Joe Biden told a virtual gathering of European leaders that the world can no longer delay or do the bare minimum to address climate change.

Kim Kardashian West filed for divorce from Kanye West in Los Angeles after 6 1/2 years of marriage.

Read more here:
Bills clarify that parental notice not meant to censor books - Richmond Times-Dispatch

Artists alter, deface their own work at YBCA to protest Gaza silence and decry censorship – 48 hills – 48 Hills

'Love Letter to Gaza' action calls out institution for not speaking up and allegedly muzzling artists.

Tens of thousands of Bay Area protesters are filling the streets and blocking freeways, and social media creators are flooding feeds with poignant imagery calling attention to the destruction of Gaza and demanding a ceasefire. But most major local arts institutionssupposed bastions of free expression, provocative messages, and artistic truthhave been strangely silent. For entities that often highlight our regional history of anti-war protest and anti-imperialist resistance in high-profile shows, theres a void where a loud Ceasefire Now should be.

Artists themselves are now protesting this institutional silence. Last Thursday evening, during a public community arts event at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts called Love Letter to SoMa, a group of artists staged a protest, defacing, adorning, augmenting, or otherwise altering their own displayed work. Calling their action Love Letter to Gaza, the eight artists, including participants in the institutions centerpiece Bay Area Now 9 show, were protesting YBCAs silence on the genocide of Palestinians, and the censorship of artists by the institution.

Artists graffitied their own pieces, hung banners over their work, dropped leaflets, and otherwise redirected their art to unequivocally address their support for the people of Palestine.

This was the first major protest over Gaza in a local arts institution, after hundreds of arts workers and other protesters occupied the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. In the wake of the Love Letter to Gaza action, YBCA closed its doors for the weekend, forcing the postponement of a portion of the 15th Annual Fresh Festival, which features performances by artists from marginalized communities.

The charges of censorship apply specifically to the work of Jeffrey Cheung and Lukaza Branfman-Verissimo. According to a statement from Jewish Voice for Peace Bay Area, which organized the action with the Palestinian Feminist Collective, Bay Area Palestinian Youth Movement, US Palestinian Community Network, and the artists: YBCA censored artist Jeff Cheungfrom creating a mural in the colors of the Palestinian flag, calling it divisive. They invited artistLukaza Branfman-Verissimoto propose text for their Statement Marquee sign, which is often a centerpiece for dialogue at the museum. But the artist says: I was told that because my text included Free Palestine they could not accept it.'

(A full response from YBCA to the censorship allegations is at the end of this post.)

The artists have launched a call to action to support their protest of YBCA. More from Jewish Voice for Peace:

The artists demands include, but are not limited to, an immediate and permanent ceasefire and for the US to stop arming Israel, an end to YBCAs censorship of artists, the removal of Zionist YBCA funders and board members, and YBCAs compliance with its vision to be a space that empowers artists, inspires community and drives lasting social change.

Our attempts to use our platforms at YBCA to catalyze solidarity with the movement to liberate Palestine have been silenced and disrupted, said Paz G., a Bay Area Now 9 artist and co-organizer of Love Letter to Gaza. There is no excuse for YBCAs silence in a time when our public dollars are being channeled to support the destruction of life and communities in Gaza.

In recent years, YBCA created robust programming and community engagement in response to social justice issues ranging from Black Lives Matter to the invasion of Ukraine. Why are they silent on the genocide of Palestinians? said champoy, a Bay Area Now 9 artist and co-organizer of Love Letter to Gaza. Cultural workers and artists across the Bay are dreaming of a free Palestine. We hope that YBCA would want to be included in that vision, not working against it.

I spoke with two Love Letter to Gaza participating artists, Sholeh Asgary and Leila Weefur, about how they altered their work, and what they hoped the protest would achieve.

Sholeh Asgary is an Iranian-born multidisciplinary artist whose Shabah e Baad (Ghost Winds) is a six-channel sound installation, inspired by a traditional practice observed in smaller Iranian villages, where qanatsancient waterways predating Roman aqueducts, created by tunneling beneath a system of wellshave enabled sustenance in arid environments.

The work taps into the ghost creeks of San Francisco, the ephemeral waterways that have been buried and otherwise disappeared by settler colonialism, Asgary said. This is being echoed by the current environmental destruction of Wadi Gaza, and the Gazan waterways in general. In her work, directional speakers create zones of sound that correspond to a map of the San Francisco creeks.

With my protest collaborator Dena Al Adeeb, I created a flyer with a new site map, of the YBCA building itself, overlaid with Wadi Gaza waterways, and arrows that referred to the forced evacuation routes for Palestinians in Gaza. We took text inspired by the Palestinian Feminist Collectives ongoing Love Letters to Palestine project, and then scattered these leaflets throughout the courtyard like the thousands of displacement leaflets the IDF has dropped by drones.

I want to emphasize the decades-long labor of Palestinian and Arab folks who have laid the groundwork that makes actions such as ours visible, as well as the organizations that supported us, she adds.

For Asgary, theres a profoundly disappointing irony to YBCAs institutional silence on Gaza. YBCA has embraced these big social justice slogans like Black Lives Matter and Woman Life Freedom and says that its creating a safe environment for marginalized artists to express themselves. But when it comes to Gaza, suddenly thats not allowed. Why invite SWANA [Southwest Asian North African] artists into your show, only to demonstrate that you think of our communities safety and humanity as divisive.

Why is it this particular movement thats forbidden from being expressed ? While my communities are being annihilated, living under bombs or the fear of bombs, YBCAs characterization of the systematic killing of 30,000+ Palestinians and the United States complicity in it as an ongoing conflict, and its censorship of artists, continues to erase our larger region, Asgary said.

Asgary traces this hyperinvisibilization back to how SWANA artists have been treated by institutions for decades. By featuring slogans like Woman Life Freedom on the marquee, which was literally displayed above where I was working, but remaining silent on Gaza, theyre hiding behind a social justice facade, while really just tokenizing the artists they need for that validity. Its another form of Orientalization.

Oakland artist Leila Weefurs contribution to Bay Area Now 9 is The Chapel of Becoming, a film and architectural work that celebrates the transgender community, queers Abrahamic traditions, and examines systems of belonging in Black and queer lives. The installation includes the words Come To Be in large letters on a public-facing glass wall of the building.

For their act of protest, they made 8 1/2 x 11 stickers with the message The Chapel of Becoming supports Palestine. Free Gaza which they placed to adorn their installation.

We came together and altered our work to make visible our allyship with Gaza and Palestine, which mirrors our immediate and extreme closeness as a community within the arts, they told me. If one of us is censored, weve all been censored.

I am very connected to this arts community. When I encounter censorship from an institution that Im developing a relationship with, it negatively impacts my ability to build unless there is accountability, Weefur said.

During the action, from my vantage point, we received a lot of support from the crowd that was there. The public feels hungry for institutions to support Gaza and Palestine. YBCA claims to support artists and their extended communities. Our action should fuel the institution to be an agent of change, but their lack of support is glaring.

Weefur sees Love Letter to Gaza as an opening for YBCA to reclaim its responsibility. This is an opportunity for YBCA to be a leader, in really being responsive and listening to the needs of the communityand the artists its claiming to serve. We have given them this opportunity to step up. We are making them relevant.

Its a shame that by closing their doors after the action, theyve chosen more censorship, by postponing the Fresh Festival, which includes other Black and Brown artists, Weefur said. Thats a step in the wrong direction.

My hope is that YBCA and all Bay Area institutions recognize the collective power of artiststhat they work with, celebrate, and uphold artists voices. That is the romantic idea they claim to support, and yet they are never prepared for what this really means when artists rise up together and speak out.

I reached out to YBCA about the charges that Jeffrey Cheung and Lukaza Branfman-Verissimo had been censored. Below is the full reply from Sara Fenske Bahat, CEO of YBCA:

Our mission at YBCA is to be a gathering space for creative expression that fosters meaningful connection for all. In support of our mission, Bay Area Now 9 was curated to provide Bay Area artists with an opportunity to showcase their voices from across different cultures, ethnicities, and perspectives. We work closely with all of our artists to realize their works and, in serving the communities of the larger Bay Area, we are committed to providing a safe space for exploring this diversity of thought and expression.

Last night during our Love Letter to SOMA free Thursday night event, a few of the 30 artists featured in Bay Area Now 9 altered or covered their exhibited work as part of a demonstration in support of Palestine.

Jeff Cheung created a mural for an outdoor space at YBCA. Jeffs design, featuring dancing/embracing figures, went through the approval process at YBCA and was approved. After the deadline for printing the work, Jeff submitted a new image that had been changed from what was previously approved, featuring a different drawing with all of the figures using the colors of the Palestinian flag.

Because the work was intended to be displayed publicly on the exterior of a city building, the curators shared in writing with Jeff:

As you are aware, public art is both a powerful opportunity, and it also amplifies the need for deliberate care. When it comes to presenting work on the exterior of our building, we have little opportunity to provide context around the authorship and intentions of the work; the audience includes passersby who have not chosen to attend YBCA exhibitions nor programming; and there are stakeholders and partners who may be inadvertently implicated or impacted. The processes and deadlines for this project were structured to make sure we could manage all of these considerations, including the involvement and approval of city entities, neighborhood partners, and funders. Given all this, were not in the position to make significant changes that alter the original tone nor focus of the mural, especially so close to finalization.

Jeff conveyed his unhappiness with the decision, and proposed a design with one grouping of figures in colors representing the colors of the Palestinian flag. The curators approved the change, and moved forward with production of the new image. In addition, the curators invited Jeff to work with them to identify additional opportunities to share his perspective through programming, engagement, and dialogue.

In regards to Lukaza Branfman-Verissimo, this past year, Lukaza was commissioned to create a public artwork on our 3rd Street exterior (initially the loading dock door, which was then extended to include a series of nearby building exit doors). Alongside their artwork, they submitted a poetic text. The curators suggested including an excerpt (We Fly for a Liberated We, We Rooted in Flight) on YBCAs external marquee, to support the unveiling of the public art piece.

Lukaza responded positively, and suggested adding Free Palestine, or if not, to keep as you proposed but make sure to include some recent pieces of mine about Palestine in our social media post announcing this marquee. Lukaza later changed their mind and no longer felt comfortable putting the excerpt on the marquee if Free Palestine wasnt added to it. Throughout the process, YBCA offered to explore options to highlight their advocacy work through programming and/or on our platforms. Lukaza did not respond to that offer, but continued to collaborate with us on the installation of their public artwork.

In these instances and across all artist projects, YBCA strives to be honest, transparent, and forthright collaborators in supporting artists voices and approaches. YBCA is committed to providing a safe space for diversity of thought and expression, even when that is challenging, which is perhaps when it is most necessary to do so. Central to BAN9 and to YBCA as an institution is being in dialogue with a wide range of perspectives and means of creative expression from across the Bay Area.

Go here to see the original:
Artists alter, deface their own work at YBCA to protest Gaza silence and decry censorship - 48 hills - 48 Hills