Mediaboss Marketing

Some Facebook users are reporting that the social networking platform is deleting comments containing the word coronavirus. What is not clear as of this writing though is whether this censorship about the virus is true across the Facebook platform for all users or only for a select group of users in the comment section.

The new censorship scheme surprised many Facebook users who noticed something wrong about their comments on Facebook posts and got in touch to let us know about it. Though, on investigation, the problem seems more widespread.

One user reported that Facebook issues a warning that says comments containing the word coronavirus go against Facebooks community standards on misinformation that could cause physical harm.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

What some other users observe though is the fact that the comment appears to have disappeared only for other people. This means that the user who posted it can still see the comment what is more commonly known as a shadowban.

Still, the question remains as to why Facebook would do implement censorship of just the word coronavirus meaning that its likely part of some wider implementation of a crackdown on misinformation or the algorithm could just be making an error.

Read more from the original source:
Some Facebook users find commenting the single word coronavirus results in auto-censorship - Reclaim The Net

Home OTT regulation, Twitter

Over May 27, a pro web censorship trend has been trending on Twitter, #CensorWebSeries. The trend seems like a concerted campaign, with scant mentions until yesterday, and has received more than 65,000 mentions today alone. The accounts receiving the most engagement under the trend so far are right wing organisations like the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti; Hindu nationalist publishers group Sanatan Prabhat, and several individuals with bios along the same lines.

Tweets are mainly focused on Amazon Prime Videos Paatal Lok, a show that deals with religion and caste in a way that these tweets say are anti-Hindu. The Samiti in particular took issues with scenes such as one that depicted a mob of Hindus lynchinga Muslim train passenger. Some of the tweets also mention shows like ALT Balaji and ZEE5s Code M, and Netflixs Sacred Games and Leila.

Netizens have slammed @AnushkaSharma and the series for showing anti-Hindu culture and glorifying beef-eating in few scenes. People called out the narrative of the show and trended #BanPaatalLok #PaatalLok on Twitter.#BoycottPaatalLok#CensorWebSeries pic.twitter.com/tcWxFMQSVi

HinduJagrutiOrg (@HinduJagrutiOrg) May 27, 2020

At the time of publishing, the trend seems to have subsided (ranked at #17 among India trends), and none of the governments ministers, like Information & Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar, have yet responded to the tweets they were tagged in.

This campaign comes as the government increases the pressure on streaming platforms to create a quasi-judicial content regulation body. The Digital Content Complaints Committee, the Internet and Mobile Association of Indias proposed solution, has divided the industry. That committee, called tier-2 among IAMAI members, has the support of only a minority of streaming services. Right before the COVID-19 pandemic started, members were in the process of deliberating on a consensus position. That discussion seems to be on hold, and a media statement published for ZEE5 CEO Tarun Katyal taking over as IAMAIs Digital Entertainment Committee chairman makes no mention of the issue.

I cover the digital content ecosystem and telecom for MediaNama.

Read the rest here:
#CensorWebSeries trends on Twitter in India - MediaNama.com

Lack of freedom and censorship, the longest-lived virus he has struggled with: Orishas

Ruso, Yotuel and Roldn, members of the Cuban group, on May 30 of last year during a presentation in Mexico City.

Ana Mnica Rodrguez

La Jornada newspaperTuesday May 26, 2020, p. 6

More than 20 years ago, Orishas burst irreverently with lyrics of social content in his very Cuban mix of hip-hop, son, rumba and guaguanc.

With different sound and rhythm, the band was gaining spaces on stages around the world while raising a song of freedom and defense of the Cuban people. She became an ambassador for the problems that exist in Cuba, but we do not give a wrong vision to the world or exaggerate or remove, she once told this newspaper.

Now, despite the global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, the gang is convinced that there is a longer-lived virus that has been battled in all times and places: the lack of freedom and censorship for giving opinions, speaking or express yourself. This is indeed the serious problem of humanity.

Yotuel Romero, member and founder of the Cuban group, explained to La Jornada: it is true that everything has been complicated by the pandemic, but censorship is tougher; It is sad when your country tries to silence you because you are on the side of the people, of feeling, showing solidarity with those who suffer.

In the case of the Covid-19, it is something that has touched us all; a vaccine is expected. In reality, it is not known why it happened and this situation must be addressed, but the virus against freedom is the one that worries not only Cuba, but the entire world, because it is against human rights.

The above is a reflection of Romero regarding the single they have just released, titled Love me as I am, in collaboration with singer-songwriter Beatriz Luengo, Pablo Milans and violinist Ara Malikian.

The musician explained: It is an autobiographical song that emerged after the censorship and the media attack by the Cuban government caused by the previous issue, I hope it happens, which became a hymn for the people due to the veracity with which, once again, a chronicle about the island was rapped. So much was its impact, that they wanted to silence it, managing to download it from all digital platforms .

Response to persecution

Love me as I am, he continued, it is a cry to freedom, to love us as we are, to be loved and not try to change us.

After the media lynching that the government did with Orishas, we feel obliged to reinvict our right, as citizens, to criticize, speak when there are injustices and denounce when something is wrong or we are concerned. This single reflects our feelings, with the idea that you have to respect to be respected. It is a forceful response to persecution, censorship and defamation, as well as the need for us to love each other despite our differences of thought.

The Orishas story began in France in 1999, with their debut album A lo Cubano, a benchmark that was later inspired by other groups in the world, which catapulted them onto the scene. In albums such as Emigrante, El kilo and Cosita buena made it clear that the group stoked a fire with social content lyrics that the years have not been able to extinguish.

Romero argued: one of our missions is to put people to reflect with our songs, to be nourished by a reality that is not published in tourism magazines, which is only known when you go to underground Cuba, where many people do not arrive; It even happens in Mexico, because tourists then just stay in the taco al pastor and on the beaches of Cancun.

Orishas has won two Grammys, in addition to a Latin Grammy for the song Pal Norte in collaboration with Calle 13. He continues to make good music, which is his passion and goal.

Some time ago they commented: we have too much love for music. We dont like the business the popular one has become. We are old-fashioned: we love to sing on stage and make our audience fall in love, conquer it.

Even, Yotuel said, the taste generated among the public has been attributed to the name of the band. We thought that by using orishas (the Afro-Cuban gods) we were going to desecrate, that believers were going to be upset, but the opposite happened, because Orishas is what young Cubans wanted to listen to for a long time.

If this name had been used to make junk music, it doesnt work; but if it is something that responds to youth, that sings to the orishas, it is to push it to the maximum, it is my religion.

The band is on that path of making songs that reach people, that engage you and make you feel something that feeds your heart; That is the direction that Orishas currently leads, said Yotuel Romero.

.

More:
Lack of freedom and censorship, the longest-lived virus he has struggled with: Orishas - Explica

Back to the Future 2 writer Bob Gale reveals Universal provided Netflix with the censored version of the movie, so the streamer isn't to blame.

Back to the Future Part II writer Bob Gale tells fans Universal is responsible for the controversial censored version, not Netflix where it streamed. The firstBack to the Future premiered in 1985, directed and co-written by Robert Zemeckis, and grossed more than $350 million at the box office. The film starred Canadian-American actor Michael J. Fox as Marty McFly, a boy who travels back in time to 1955. He's joined by his eccentric friend, scientist Emmett "Doc" Brown (Christopher Lloyd) in the now-iconic modified Delorean. Lea Thompson plays Marty's mom in the past and present, thanks to prosthetics, like Crispin Glover in the role George McFly, Marty's dad.

Though initially conceived as a stand-alone film, the popularity led to a franchise that continued withBack to the Future Part IIin 1989, which filmed consecutively with the third installment.Back to the Future Part IIIreleased the following year, in 1990. Some regard the second film as not only one of Zemeckis' best works, but one of the best sequels of all time. Gale wrote most of the first draft forPart II alone, while Zemeckis completed work onWho Framed Roger Rabbit?.Pre-production set construction and developing convincing aging prosthetics took around two years before principal filming began.

Related:What Michael J. Fox Has Done Since Back To The Future

Gale spoke withTHRabout an edited version ofBack to the Future Part II streaming on Netflix. Thealtered sceneappears when Marty finds the French lingerie magazine,Oh La La,within the sports almanac dustcover. In the censored version, the scene is shortened, and the cover of the magazine isn't shown. The almanac becomes a major plot point for the movie, so cutting out two linesthatprovide context for the film to edit out the magazine cover is a problem.

However,Gale revealed the censorship was the work of the film's original distributor, Universal Pictures, who provided Netflix with that version. Neither Gale nor Zemeckis knew the cut existed until it appeared on Netflix. The writer emphasized that Netflix does not edit films from other studios and did not blame them for the situation. He also explained it was a foreign version of the film, "for some country that had a problem with the Oh La La magazine cover."Gale even took it a step further and asked that Universal destroy that version ofBack to the Future Part II.

The edits seemed surprising when first announced, as Netflix isn't known for withholding graphic or sexual content. The truth that the cut came from Universal, used for foreign distribution, and makes far more sense. While one could wrap their mind around editing out the cover to make the film "more family-friendly," removing the two lines which frame the discovery of the almanac and its role in the film is a disservice to the fans consumingBack to the Future Part IIfor the first time. The experience underscores the control of studios over the work of directors, as well as the ability to alter a finished product and potentially alter its legacy.Netflix now has the original, unedited versions of all three filmsstreaming.

Next:Back To The Future: All Three Movies, Ranked Worst To Best

Source: THR

Vader's Scars Are Bared For All To See In Star Wars Old Military Fan Art

Maki Zatychies is a freelance writer based in Ontario, Canada, with a BAh in English and an MA in creative non-fiction from the University of Guelph. Alex Trebek is her lord, and she worships at the altar of Jeopardy! Her consumption of media, literature, and pop culture ranges from excessive to compulsive. She lives in a hobbit hole with her mini-Rex rabbit, Sawyer.

Excerpt from:
Netflix Didn't Censor Back To The Future 2, Universal Did - Screen Rant

Republican Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzState Department scrutiny threatens Pompeo's political ambitions 125 lawmakers urge Trump administration to support National Guard troops amid pandemic Parties gear up for battle over Texas state House MORE (Texas) threatened to stop federal agencies from cooperating with Hollywood productions Thursday during a speech he made on the Senate floor.

The senator was introducing a new piece of legislation, the SCRIPT Act, that seeks to hamper the modification of American movies in China.

It is a common practice for major studios to make their films palatable to consumers in the Asian country. However, Cruz called the edits acts of censorship and compared them to foreign propaganda.

The senator said he is vigilant about the Chinese governments attempts to censor and silence elsewhere, including our own nation.

The bill would ban all federal agencies from participating in productions that "censor" or change American films for Chinese consumption. A previous version of the bill only prohibited participation by the Department of Defense.

Filmmakers rely on the government for the use of things like government logos, military bases, aircraft carriers and federal buildings to film content for TV and movies centered on topics like the armed forces and space exploration.

The senator used the example of actor Tom Cruises character in the forthcoming sequel Top Gun: Maverick.

He noted the characters jacket was missing Japanese and Taiwanese flags in promotional images and trailers, which he believes was done to please Chinese censors.

What message does it send that Maverick, an American icon, is apparently afraid of the Chinese communists? Cruz said. Thats ridiculous.

The bill comes amid rising tensions between the U.S. and China,as President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump anti-reg push likely to end up in court Biden set to make risky economic argument against Trump Hillicon Valley: Tech companies lead way on WFH forever | States and counties plead for cybersecurity assistance | Trump weighing anti-conservative bias panel MORE has blamed the country for the spread of the coronavirus.

Trump's reelection campaign has also said it plans to make former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenBiden set to make risky economic argument against Trump Hillicon Valley: Tech companies lead way on WFH forever | States and counties plead for cybersecurity assistance | Trump weighing anti-conservative bias panel What does Joe Biden believe about NASA, space exploration and commercial space? MORE's (D) past relationship with China a central pressure point during the upcoming election.

Read more:
Cruz threatens to stop federal agencies from cooperating with Hollywood over China 'censorship' | TheHill - The Hill