Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

censorship – Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com

Censorship blocks something from being read, heard, or seen. If you've ever heard the sound of bleeping when someone is speaking on television, that's censorship.

To "censor" is to review something and to choose to remove or hide parts of it that are considered unacceptable. Censorship is the name for the process or idea of keeping things like obscene word or graphic images from an audience. There is also such a thing as self-censorship, which is when you refrain from saying certain things or possibly re-wording them depending on who is listening.

Definitions of censorship

1

censorship in the form of prudish expurgation

censorship because of perceived obscenity or immorality

the act of deleting something written or printed

all types of censorship conducted by personnel of the armed forces

censorship under civil authority of communications entering or leaving of crossing the borders of the United States or its territories or possessions

military censorship of civilian communications (correspondence or printed matter of films) entering or leaving of circulating within territories controlled by armed forces

security review of news (including all information or material intended for dissemination to the public) subject to the jurisdiction of the armed forces

military censorship of communication to and from prisoners of war and civilian internees held by the armed forces

military censorship of personal communications to or from persons in the armed forces

intelligence activities concerned with identifying and counteracting the threat to security posed by hostile intelligence organizations or by individuals engaged in espionage or sabotage or subversion or terrorism

Visit link:
censorship - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com

How Internet Censorship Works – HowStuffWorks

One of the early nicknames for the Internet was the "information superhighway" because it was supposed to provide the average person with fast access to a practically limitless amount of data. For many users, that's exactly what accessing the Internet is like. For others, it's as if the information superhighway has some major roadblocks in the form of Internet censorship.

The motivations for censorship range from well-intentioned desires to protect children from unsuitable content to authoritarian attempts to control a nation's access to information. No matter what the censors' reasons are, the end result is the same: They block access to the Web pages they identify as undesirable.

Internet censorship isn't just a parental or governmental tool. There are several software products on the consumer market that can limit or block access to specific Web sites. Most people know these programs as Web filters. Censorship opponents have another name for them: Censorware.

While there are some outspoken supporters and opponents of Internet censorship, it's not always easy to divide everyone into one camp or another. Not everyone uses the same tactics to accomplish goals. Some opponentsof censorship challenge government policies in court. Others take the role of information freedom fighters, providing people with clandestine ways to access information.

In this article, we'll look at the different levels of Internet censorship, from off-the-shelf Web filters to national policy. We'll also learn about the ways some people are trying to fight censorship.

We'll start off by looking at Internet censorship on the domestic level.

Original post:
How Internet Censorship Works - HowStuffWorks

Censorship: 38 journalism groups slam Obama’s ‘politically …

In unprecedented criticism of the White House, 38 journalism groups have assailed the president's team for censoring media coverage, limiting access to top officials and overall politically-driven suppression of the news.

In a letter to President Obama, the 38, led by the Society of Professional Journalists, said efforts by government officials to stifle or block coverage has grown for years and reached a high-point under his administration despite Obama's 2008 campaign promise to provide transparency.

Worse, they said: As access for reporters has been cut off, the administration has opened the door to lobbyists, special interests and people with money.

And as a result, they wrote, Obama only has himself to blame for the current cynicism of his administration. You need look no further than your own administration for a major source of that frustration politically driven suppression of news and information about federal agencies. We call on you to take a stand to stop the spin and let the sunshine in, wrote David Cuillier, president of SPJ.

More from the Washington Examiner

Nearly three-quarters of Republicans approve of the criteria that have been put in place.

08/04/15 12:08 PM

The administration has dismissed similar charges from other journalism groups, notably the White House Correspondents Association, but the new letter sent Tuesday provided several examples of censorship and efforts to block reporter access. Among them:

Officials blocking reporters requests to talk to specific staff people.

Excessive delays in answering interview requests that stretch past reporters deadlines.

Continue reading here:
Censorship: 38 journalism groups slam Obama's 'politically ...

The Connection Has Been Reset – The Atlantic

Illustration by John Ritter

Many foreigners who come to China for the Olympics will use the Internet to tell people back home what they have seen and to check what else has happened in the world.

The first thing theyll probably notice is that Chinas Internet seems slow. Partly this is because of congestion in Chinas internal networks, which affects domestic and international transmissions alike. Partly it is because even electrons take a detectable period of time to travel beneath the Pacific Ocean to servers in America and back again; the trip to and from Europe is even longer, because that goes through America, too. And partly it is because of the delaying cycles imposed by Chinas system that monitors what people are looking for on the Internet, especially when theyre looking overseas. Thats what foreigners have heard about.

Theyll likely be surprised, then, to notice that Chinas Internet seems surprisingly free and uncontrolled. Can they search for information about Tibet independence or Tiananmen shooting or other terms they have heard are taboo? Probablyand theyll be able to click right through to the controversial sites. Even if they enter the Chinese-language term for democracy in China, theyll probably get results. What about Wikipedia, famously off-limits to users in China? They will probably be able to reach it. Naturally the visitors will wonder: Whats all this Ive heard about the Great Firewall and Chinas tight limits on the Internet?

In reality, what the Olympic-era visitors will be discovering is not the absence of Chinas electronic control but its new refinementand a special Potemkin-style unfettered access that will be set up just for them, and just for the length of their stay. According to engineers I have spoken with at two tech organizations in China, the government bodies in charge of censoring the Internet have told them to get ready to unblock access from a list of specific Internet Protocol (IP) addressescertain Internet cafs, access jacks in hotel rooms and conference centers where foreigners are expected to work or stay during the Olympic Games. (I am not giving names or identifying details of any Chinese citizens with whom I have discussed this topic, because they risk financial or criminal punishment for criticizing the system or even disclosing how it works. Also, I have not gone to Chinese government agencies for their side of the story, because the very existence of Internet controls is almost never discussed in public here, apart from vague statements about the importance of keeping online information wholesome.)

Depending on how you look at it, the Chinese governments attempt to rein in the Internet is crude and slapdash or ingenious and well crafted. When American technologists write about the control system, they tend to emphasize its limits. When Chinese citizens discuss itat least with methey tend to emphasize its strength. All of them are right, which makes the governments approach to the Internet a nice proxy for its larger attempt to control peoples daily lives.

Disappointingly, Great Firewall is not really the right term for the Chinese governments overall control strategy. China has indeed erected a firewalla barrier to keep its Internet users from dealing easily with the outside worldbut that is only one part of a larger, complex structure of monitoring and censorship. The official name for the entire approach, which is ostensibly a way to keep hackers and other rogue elements from harming Chinese Internet users, is the Golden Shield Project. Since that term is too creepy to bear repeating, Ill use the control system for the overall strategy, which includes the Great Firewall of China, or GFW, as the means of screening contact with other countries.

In America, the Internet was originally designed to be free of choke points, so that each packet of information could be routed quickly around any temporary obstruction. In China, the Internet came with choke points built in. Even now, virtually all Internet contact between China and the rest of the world is routed through a very small number of fiber-optic cables that enter the country at one of three points: the Beijing-Qingdao-Tianjin area in the north, where cables come in from Japan; Shanghai on the central coast, where they also come from Japan; and Guangzhou in the south, where they come from Hong Kong. (A few places in China have Internet service via satellite, but that is both expensive and slow. Other lines run across Central Asia to Russia but carry little traffic.) In late 2006, Internet users in China were reminded just how important these choke points are when a seabed earthquake near Taiwan cut some major cables serving the country. It took months before international transmissions to and from most of China regained even their pre-quake speed, such as it was.

Thus Chinese authorities can easily do something that would be harder in most developed countries: physically monitor all traffic into or out of the country. They do so by installing at each of these few international gateways a device called a tapper or network sniffer, which can mirror every packet of data going in or out. This involves mirroring in both a figurative and a literal sense. Mirroring is the term for normal copying or backup operations, and in this case real though extremely small mirrors are employed. Information travels along fiber-optic cables as little pulses of light, and as these travel through the Chinese gateway routers, numerous tiny mirrors bounce reflections of them to a separate set of Golden Shield computers.Here the terms creepiness is appropriate. As the other routers and servers (short for file servers, which are essentially very large-capacity computers) that make up the Internet do their best to get the packet where its supposed to go, Chinas own surveillance computers are looking over the same information to see whether it should be stopped.

Read more:
The Connection Has Been Reset - The Atlantic

Talking With Rainbow Rowell About Censorship

When Rainbow Rowells first YA novelEleanor & Parkcame out this spring, people loved it. After John Green gave it a glowing (shimmering, really. Incandescent, even) review in the New York Times,even more people loved it. It was an Amazon Best Book of the Month, a New York Times bestseller, and it inspired a shocking amount of beautifully rendered fan art.I loved it, my mother loved it, my pregnant coworker loved it, my friend who never reads YA loved it. You probably loved it, too.(Full disclosure: Rainbow Rowell is a friend of mine. She once mailed me a photograph of Alan Alda and also a postcard with a drawing of an oyster on it that said The World Is Your Oyster after I quit my day job, so I would even go so far as to call her a good friend.)

A group of high school librarians in Minnesota loved Eleanor & Park so much that they chose it as their school districts summer read, giving all their high school students the option to read it and invited Rowell to come visit the Minneapolis-area schools and the local public library this fall.

But there are some who do not love it, not even a little bit, not even at all.

Two parents, with the support of the districts Parents Action League have convinced the Anoka-Hennepin school district, the county board, and the local library board to cancel her events next week calling Eleanor & Park a dangerously obscene book, demanding that it be removed from library shelves and asking that school librarians be disciplined for choosing it.

From theNational Coalition Against Censorship:

Until we got involved in the issue, Rainbow Rowell couldnt be 100% sure she had even been disinvited. The teachers and librarians had showed great enthusiasm at the outset, but as the date of her visit drew near, she was given mixed messages about her contract there and eventually came up against a communications freeze. A parent had lodged a challenge to profanity in the book and asked that the librarians who organized the talk to be punished. They riled up an action group (withexperiencein censorship) to organize against the author at the level of the County Board. The order came down. The talk was nixed and librarians were asked not to speak on the topic.

By mid-August, it looked as though the school visit would have to be cancelled Rowells literary agent received a note informing her of the official challenge but that it would still be possible for her to attend an event at the public library.

Then these concerned parents took the fight to the county board (Too hot for teens or taxpayer money, according to the Watchdog Minnesota Bureau), and that was the end of things. Right, as it happens, in the middle of Banned Books Week, which I found too delicious and infuriating to pass up, and begged Rainbow to let me talk to her about it. She begrudgingly agreed.

Rainbow! Hello! Thank you for changing your mind about this!

Mallory! Hi!

See the rest here:
Talking With Rainbow Rowell About Censorship