Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Adviser suspended after pro-Trump messages were edited out of high school yearbooks – Washington Post

A New Jersey high school yearbook adviser has been suspended amid an investigation into censorship allegations overphotos and a quotation that were altered to remove references to President Trump, according to news reports.

Three students at Wall High School in central New Jersey noticed the changes in their yearbooks late last week, and their parents have since been calling for action.

Wall Township public schoolsSuperintendent Cheryl Dyer said last weekthat the district learned aboutan allegation of censorship and the possible violation of First Amendment rights and was investigating the matter. She told USA Todaylate Monday that the teacher, whom she would not name,was suspended pending further disciplinary action. NJ.com reported that the teacher has been suspendedindefinitely with pay while the district investigates the allegations.

Dyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the suspension. Its still unclear what role the teacher may have played in the yearbook alterations.

[Parents outraged after pro-Trump messages were edited out of this high schools yearbooks]

On picture day in October, one student,juniorWyatt Dobrovich-Fago, had worn a fleece vest with a Trump campaign logo, but it appeared to be cropped out in the yearbook. His sister, Montana, who was freshman-class president, was missing a Trump quote that was meant to appear beneath her photo. I like thinking big. If you are going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big, itread,according to CNN.

But perhaps the most blatant edit was to17-year-oldGrant BerardosTRUMP Make America Great Again! T-shirt, which was apparently altered in his yearbook photo to removethe Republican presidential nominees campaign slogan. In the yearbook, the high school junior appeared to be wearing a plain and simple, dark-colored T-shirt.

Grants father,Joseph Berardo, said in a Facebook post Monday night that he had met with the school administration earlier in the day and was informed that the teacher had been suspended.

There was a lapse in judgement and mistakes were made. I suspect there will be meaningful consequences, Berardo wrote.

I refuse to be censored although my son was, he added. Issues like these are too important to look the other way. HOWEVER, if we agree to talk instead of shout, I believe we can always find common ground.

Berardo earlier told The Washington Post that school pictures were sent home to the studentsfamilies after the electionand that there did not seem to be any issue with Grants portrait.

In fact, he said, Grants picturewasused as hisschool identificationphoto.

He was just really surprised; it was the first election he ever took an interest in, he said of his son. His question was, Is it okay? Did someone do something here that they shouldnt have done? Thats why Im pursuing it.He said he wants his son to understand that althoughthese are your teachers and administrators, there are still things youre permitted to do throughthe Constitution.

Dyer, the superintendent, previouslysaid in a statement, Two parents have notified the school district of ways in which the attire of their children was altered in yearbook photos. Further, there are claims that comments or quotes offered for inclusion in the yearbook were not published. References to and support of President Trump were involved in each of these incidents.

There is nothing in Wall Township High Schools student dress code that would prevent a student from expressing his or her political views, or support for a political figure, via appropriate clothing and attire, she said. Indeed, the administration applauds students for becoming involved in politics, making their voices known, and taking an active part in our democracy.

The district has not identified the suspended adviser, but Berardo said it was Susan Parsons, who has worked for the district for 15 years, according to her course website. Thecourse sitestates that Parsons oversees Yearbook 1, 2 and 3, as well as other technology courses such as digital media, Web page design, computer repair and digital animation and gaming.

Parsons could not immediately be reached Tuesday for comment and an email sent to her schoolemail address came back as undeliverable. But she told the New York Post, We have never made any action against any political party.

Shewould not say who made the edits, according to the New York Post.

Read more:

A public university eases limits on chalk messages after complaint from antiabortion group

U.S. universities in Qatar wary of diplomatic upheaval isolating the country

Where do Virginias Democratic gubernatorial candidates stand on school choice and other education issues?

Nonprofit sues Education Dept. for release of information on campus sex-assault investigations

View post:
Adviser suspended after pro-Trump messages were edited out of high school yearbooks - Washington Post

Kerala HC dismisses plea by documentary filmmakers challenging denial of censor exemption – The Indian Express


The Indian Express
Kerala HC dismisses plea by documentary filmmakers challenging denial of censor exemption
The Indian Express
The documentary, directed by Shawn Sebastian and NC Fazil, was one of the three short films which were denied censorship exemption by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting for screening at the ongoing festival. All three documentaries, which ...
Allow Screenings Of Films On Rohith Vemula, Kashmir And JNU At Kerala Film Festival, Filmmakers Write To Venkaiah ...Outlook India

all 19 news articles »

Read more:
Kerala HC dismisses plea by documentary filmmakers challenging denial of censor exemption - The Indian Express

Wikileaks Documentary Makers Accuse Assange of Censorship – Newsweek

We are the producers of Risk , a documentary film about Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.

We unequivocally defend WikiLeaks journalistic right to publish true and newsworthy information.

The Trump administrations threats against WikiLeaks and attacks on press freedom are chilling. As Margaret Sullivan recently argued in the Washington Post, prosecuting WikiLeaks under the Espionage Act would set a dangerous precedent for all journalists.

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

We were disturbed, however, to learn that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks sent cease and desist letters to our distributors demanding they stop the release of Risk: We therefore demand that you immediately cease the use and distribution of all images of the Named Participants and that you desist from this or any other infringement of the rights of the Named Participants in the future.

In WikiLeaks efforts to prevent the distribution of Risk , they are using the very tactics often used against them legal threats, false security claims, underhanded personal attacks, misdirection and with the same intentions: to suppress information and silence speech.

Filmmaker Laura Poitras speaks as former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor turned whistleblower Edward Snowden is seen on a video conference screen during an award ceremony for the Carl von Ossietzky journalism prize on December 14, 2014 in Berlin, Germany. Adam Berry/Getty

Since 2016, Assange and his lawyers have repeatedly demanded that we remove scenes from the film in which Assange speaks about the two women who made sexual assault allegations against him in 2010 and Swedens investigation which has since been discontinued.

In response to our refusal to remove these scenes, Assange and his lawyers are now claiming that Risk threatens the safety of the staff who consented to being filmed, and furthermore, that we are being sexist by including Assanges own comments about women in the film.

These arguments are not only false, they are a deliberate effort at misdirection.

Risk was filmed over the course of many years, beginning in 2011. Assange and WikiLeaks freely consented to participating in the film, knowing we were making an independent documentary. Neither WikiLeaks nor Assange have any editorial control of Risk. There were individuals who requested from the beginning not to appear in the film, and those requests were respected.

Wikileaks and their lawyers were shown the film before each public screening, most recently inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London on April 1, 2017. Each time, we invited their responses.

WikiLeaks comments have consistently been about image management, including: demands to remove scenes from the film where Assange discusses sexual assault allegations against him; requests to remove images of alcohol bottles in the embassy because Ecuador is a Catholic country and it looks bad; requests to include mentions of WikiLeaks in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates; and, requests to add more scenes with attorney Amal Clooney because she makes WikiLeaks look good.

It is only after we declined to make the changes they tried to impose that WikiLeaks raised objections to Risk . Their attempts to censor the content of the film are an effort to prevent reporting on Assanges own words. They also constitute a saddening break with WikiLeaks own ideals.

Last month, WikiLeaks lawyers published an op-ed saying they object to our editing in the United States. However, Assange has known since 2015 that we were editing in the U.S. In 2016, he signed an agreement to license WikiLeaks own footage to us and raised no objection to mailing a hard drive with footage directly to our editing room in New York City.

WikiLeaks has also repeatedly publicized their participation in Risk , most recently re-tweeting a link to the films trailer on April 10, 2017 (a tweet that has since been deleted), without raising any concerns.

In their cease and desist letter, lawyers for WikiLeaks and Assange state: The unauthorized release of the Film has caused our clients to suffer ongoing irreparable harm, and exponentially increasing damages every time a new viewer sees the Film.

All the participants in Risk agreed for years to be in the film. We have no obligation to seek WikiLeaks or Assanges authorization to release the film. In fact, our rights under the First Amendment are protected precisely because we are engaging in independent journalism. Assange himself has criticized the media for seeking permission from public figures before releasing stories.

Like WikiLeaks, our journalism has been the target of U.S. government investigation, secret grand jury, and threats by elected officials. We fully understand and empathize with the dangers WikiLeaks is facing, and we stand in solidarity with all journalists and publishers around the world currently under attack.

View post:
Wikileaks Documentary Makers Accuse Assange of Censorship - Newsweek

Facebook Aims to Start Debate on Censorship, Fake News – Variety

Facebook is getting ready to explain itself. The social media juggernaut kick-started an effort to more openly debate questions of free speech and censorship, false and misleading news and the impact social media has on democracy Thursday, announcing a series of posts that aims to explain the thinking and internal debates behind some of the companys policies.

As more and more of our lives extend online, and digital technologies transform how we live, we all face challenging new questions everything from how best to safeguard personal privacy online to the meaning of free expression to the future of journalism worldwide, wrote Facebook VP of Public Policy and Communications Elliot Schragein a blog post.

We debate these questions fiercely and freely inside Facebook every day and with experts from around the world whom we consult for guidance, he wrote. We take seriously our responsibility and accountability for our impact and influence.

To start a public conversation around these subjects, and explain Facebooks stance, the company will try to answer what Schrage called hard questions. A first post, also published Thursday, explored how social networks should fight the spreading of terrorist propaganda online. Another post in the pipeline will aim to answer who should decide if a post is false news, or just political speech.

In addition to explaining Facebooks side, the company also asked users to chime in albeit not publicly. Instead,Schrage encouraged anyone to email questions of comments to a dedicated email address,hardquestions@fb.com arguably an odd choice, given the fact that these very issues are about speech on Facebook.

The initiative is a clear response to growing criticism that Facebook isnt doing enough to fight the spreading of false and misleading news and other types of objectionable content. Facebook first found itself in the defensive over these issues after the election of President Trump, and again after a Cleveland man posted a video of a homicide he had committed on the social network.

Follow this link:
Facebook Aims to Start Debate on Censorship, Fake News - Variety

LETTER: Yearbook censorship is left-wing gone amok – Cherry Hill Courier Post

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

They have taken their cue from the left-wing media, and dictate whatever they choose to show the American people.

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

The Courier-Post 2:46 p.m. ET June 15, 2017

Grant Berardo, a Wall High School junior, saw his image digitally altered with a plain black T-shirt in his yearbook. Mike Davis

Wall Township High School junior Grant Berardo's T-shirt was digitally altered in the school's yearbook.(Photo: Courtesy of Joseph Berardo, Jr.)

Thank you, Courier-Post, for publishing the article Teens T-shirt censored in yearbook about Grant Berardo, the Wall Township High School junior who chose to have his yearbook photo taken while wearing a Trump T-shirt. He was very disappointed when it was Photoshopped and shown in the yearbook with the Trump logo removed. He was not breaking any of the schools dress codes.

Wall school superintendent, Cheryl Dyer, said that she was investigating who was responsible. I was pleased to hear that. In this case, it was discovered later that day that the guilty party allegedly was the adviser of the yearbook and has now been suspended. This only demonstrates how emboldened the snowflakes have become. They may feel that it is their privilege to take it upon themselves, fearing no ill consequences for their actions.

They have taken their cue from the left-wing media, and dictate whatever they choose to show the American people. Where has much of our freedom of speech gone? Or is it only for the left? I can see now why President Donald Trump tweets. It is really one of the few avenues left open for the president to get the truth out to the people.

Mickie Shea

Marlton

Read or Share this story: http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/opinion/readers/2017/06/15/letter-yearbook-censorship-left-wing-gone-amok/400807001/

0:55

The rest is here:
LETTER: Yearbook censorship is left-wing gone amok - Cherry Hill Courier Post