Formalizing Censorship through the IRS – Video
Formalizing Censorship through the IRS
Formalizing Censorship through the IRS.
By: Education and Communications
See the rest here:
Formalizing Censorship through the IRS - Video
Formalizing Censorship through the IRS
Formalizing Censorship through the IRS.
By: Education and Communications
See the rest here:
Formalizing Censorship through the IRS - Video
Failing to step back and drop the case against Hendry will further sully Malaysias own reputation for clamping down on opposition organisations, rights activists and critics, says Mickey Spiegel.
Lena Hendry Photograph:Haris Hassan/ fz.com
As a member of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva from 2011 to 2013, Malaysia had plenty of opportunities to hear serious allegations of systematic army abuses in the final days of the civil war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
Ultimately, a commission appointed by the UN Secretary-General determined that up to 40,000 civilians died in the last months of the fighting, and Britains ITN Channel 4 brought the brutal final days into high definition with its searing award-winning documentary No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka.
Unlike other Asian nations serving on the Human Rights Council who sided with Sri Lanka, Malaysia abstained in votes on Sri Lanka resolutions, making what was considered nothing more than a nod to concerns about the seriousness of those crimes.
Fast forward to 2014 and local Malaysia politics are pushing rights principles out the window. Malaysia is pursuing a case that has all the earmarks of a politically motivated vendetta against Lena Hendry, a Programme Coordinator at the nongovernmental organisation Pusat Komas, for violating the seldom-enforced Film Censorship Act for arranging a screening of No Fire Zone last July in Kuala Lumpur.
Criminal penalties for censorship violations are severe. Hendry could spend three years in prison and face fines up to RM30,000 (US$9,500). Her selective persecution is seen by other showings, including to parliamentarians and by another NGO, which did not result in any government action.
An upcoming defence application to strike out the charge, scheduled for 6 February in the Kuala Lumpur Criminal High Court, is an opportune time for the Malaysian government to bow out of this ill-advised venture into censorship.
Calling it quits now on the case will reaffirm Malaysians rights to see the films they want, exercise their right to free expression, and freely assembly. It will also reaffirm previous positions of the government not to back Sri Lankas effort to wipe out the enormous blot on its human rights record.
Failing to step back and drop the case against Hendry will further sully Malaysias own reputation for clamping down on opposition organisations, civil rights activists, and outspoken critics.
See the original post:
Film censorship case puts Malaysias rights record in the dock
Contact Information
Available for logged-in reporters only
Newswise STONY BROOK, NY, February 4, 2014Phillipa Gill, Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at Stony Brook University, has been selected to receive a 2014 Early Career Award from the National Science Foundations (NSF) Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace Program in the amount of $514,000.
The five-year award entitled CAREER: Illuminating the Impacts of Internet Censorship with Principled Network Measurement, was made to Gill to direct a study focusing on the development of a system for monitoring and measuring Internet censorship around the world.
Gills research will take a look at how nations repurpose Internet protocols and network management products for information control. This unintended use of networking technologies can lead to unpredictable international impact of censorship, and raises many ethical issues when network management products are exported to countries that use them to violate human rights. The use of technology to restrict freedom of speech and persecute dissidents around the globe is a human rights concern.
"Internet censorship measurement is challenging because its implications are largely social, but in order to have real world impact, these results need to be placed on a solid technical foundation," said Dr. Gill. "This CAREER award will help me realize a system that provides concrete technical evidence to inform policy discussions about information controls on the Internet."
Gill's research interests are in computer networks with a focus on network measurement and characterization. She uses novel network measurement techniques, data analysis and ideas from economics to improve security and reliability of networks. Through dialogue with relevant stakeholders on the Internet standardization bodies, government organizations, and network operators she works to have real world impact with research.
Dr. Gill is to be congratulated on joining the ranks of young Stony Brook researchers who have received a prestigious NSF Career award, said Samuel L. Stanley Jr., MD, President of Stony Brook University. Dr. Gill is at the forefront in this crucial field, and this award will help her continue to make strides in researching systems and processes that, on a global scale, will ensure transparency of use where networking technology is concerned.
Prior to joining Stony Brook University in 2013, Gill was a postdoctoral fellow at The Citizen Lab in the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto where she developed the connections required to bring her censorship measurement system to fruition with individuals running measurements around the globe. She completed her Ph.D. at the University of Toronto in 2012 and holds a M.Sc. and B.Sc.in Computer Science from the University of Calgary. While pursuing her Ph.D., she spent time as a visiting researcher at AT&T LabsResearch, Boston University, and Microsoft Research.
Among her most impressive honors and awards, Gill received the Best Paper Award at the 2013 Internet Measurement Conference for her paper "Follow the Money: Understanding Economics of Online Aggregation and Advertising;" she received the Best Presentation Award at the 2011 IBM Workshop for Frontiers of Cloud Computing for her presentation, "Understanding Network Failures in Data Centers: Measurement, Analysis, and Implications;" and she received another Best Paper Award in the 2008 Passive and Active Measurement Conference for her paper, "The Flattening Internet Topology: Natural Evolution, Unsightly Barnacles or Contrived Collapse."
Go here to read the rest:
Phillipa Gill Receives Early Career Award to Examine and Measure Internet Censorship
Kolkata, Feb 4 (IANS) Terming censorship of books "extremely objectionable", leading intellectuals of the city Tuesday slammed the decision of the Kolkata Book Fair authorities to cancel the release of a book on crimes against women.
The launch of "Parijayee Naree" (displaced or migrant women) that deals with critical women's issues, including violence, was blocked Monday at the ongoing 38th International Kolkata Book Fair on the grounds of violence against women being a "debatable and sensitive" issue.
It is published by the women's rights organisation - Nari Nirjatan Pratirodh Manch (Forum Against Atrocities on Women) - and is centred on the first Maitreyee Chattopadhyay memorial lecture delivered by leading Indian feminist Jasodhara Bagchi in 2013.
Bagchi was also the former chairperson of the West Bengal Commission for Women.
Miratun Nahar, a prominent activist, who has on various occasions derided the West Bengal government for failing to curb atrocities on women, was slated to launch the book.
"The book fair organisers (Booksellers and Publishers Guild) cancelled the release at the last moment and told us the content (violence against women) was debatable and sensitive," Saswati Ghosh, one of the founder members of the forum, told IANS.
"But it (the book) does not deal with politics ... that means a book on women's issues is looked as sensitive ... something that needs to be discussed across India, is dubbed sensitive," said Ghosh, adding the Guild also pointed out a technicality regarding the booking of the auditorium for the release.
Critically acclaimed author Nabaneeta Dev Sen said the move shrinks the space available for discussion on women's rights.
"Book fair is a space for discussion ... and there isn't enough space for discussion on women's issues. This is closing up a space. I can't understand their arguments for cancelling the release ... the lecture is already available in public domain and it challenges the situation all over India," Sen told IANS.
"Censorship of books is extremely objectionable ... we all are against it," added Sen.
Go here to see the original:
Scrapping launch of book on women's issues draws flak
Censorship fail (too little too late) following the Seahawks Superbowl Domination
Intoxicated fan gets a LITTLE too rowdy, and exposes his self for a TINY period of time on live TV. Fox #39;s attempts to censor it come up a little SHORT.
By: Kristopher Gower
See the rest here:
Censorship fail (too little too late) following the Seahawks Superbowl Domination - Video