An Essay on Censorship by Joseph Conrad
A rather scathing and sarcastic attack on the censor of plays, which at the time actually existed when Conrad wrote his first and only (disastrously received...
By: Donald Miller
Read more here:
An Essay on Censorship by Joseph Conrad - Video
Google YouTube Censorship Removal Video NYPD Coruption write
By: DataBratM82A01
See the rest here:
Google YouTube Censorship Removal Video NYPD Coruption write - Video
There are some topics you'd expect repressive regimes to block online. There's porn (obviously), opposing political ideals, religious diversity, and websites, like Peacefire.org, that instruct people on how to move around those blockers.
And then there's the Boy Scouts, specifically Troop 87 of North Andover, Massachusetts, which, for some reason, has made it onto Saudi Arabia's list of verboten web domains, according to programmer and Internet freedom activist Bennett Haselton. The Saudi censors' list also includes troops 103 and 78, a German website dedicated to the preservation of big cats, and the Tucson Jazz Institute.
Trying to put barriers on something as vast and nebulous as the Internet often results in lolzy blocked domains like these. Take, for example, the censorship work behind Chinese microblogging site Sina Weibo, which at times has exiled American band Hoobastank from the site's lexicon, along with the term "hairy bacon"--or, how Weibo users refer to the preserved body of Mao Zedong. Sometimes these are the actions of algorithmic glitches or the deft, nuanced work of an army of individual censors. But in Saudi Arabia's case, it's something slightly different altogether.
Haselton, who founded Peacefire.org, discovered a partial list of Saudi Arabia's blocked websites after devising a process with the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab to test for the presence of URL censorship in countries all over the world. Specifically, Haselton was curious to see if Saudi Arabia and other countries, were using URL filtering products from Western companies--the same sort of filters to stop kids from looking at porn on public school library computers.
Weirdly enough, Saudi Arabia's error messages to blocked sites resembled those of McAfee's Smartfilter, a common URL filtering product. So, Haselton and his colleagues came up with 10 proxy sites that might warrant filtering. They submitted five to Smartfilter for blocking, and left the other five alone. After Smartfilter confirmed that it had added the first give sites to its block list, Haselton noticed that those five sites also became blocked in Saudi Arabia, while the control group remained untouched.
Saudi Arabian censors, as it happened, were using McAfee.
Haselton explains that Middle Eastern Internet censorship usually falls into three broad categories: censorship software defaults (like porn or gambling sites), sites that accidentally fall into the pornography category (like the Wyoming Bighorn Basin's Sportsmen's group, which includes "nsfw" in the URL), and specific sites that Saudi Arabian censors add to their own block list, like Amnesty International's reporting on human rights abuses in their country. But that still doesn't explain why Saudi Arabian censors would block things like an Australian singer-songwriter and the therapy dog providers on Haselton's list.
"The short answer is that we don't know," Haselton wrote in an e-mail. "If the company wants to reveal how those sites got blocked, fine, but we can't force them. All we can do is document the indisputable fact that these sites did get blocked."
There's some exquisite irony to the fact that anti-virus mogul John McAfee is an outspoken critic of government overreach in the form of the NSA's online surveillance. The company he founded, as Haselton points out, is currently selling its products to at least one repressive regime (McAfee, the company, is now owned by Intel). In early 2013, Citizen Lab also identified Blue Coat Systems, a California-based software company, as one that sold censorship tools to 61 countries with delicate human rights and surveillance histories, including Syria, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates.
"I do think blocking software companies have a responsibility not to sell to foreign government censors, but I think corporations have responsibilities to do lots of things that they're not currently doing," Haselton writes.
Read more from the original source:
Saudi Arabia Does Not Like Boy Scout Troops or Therapy Dogs, According Blocked Website List
Minister for Justice Alan Shatter: his book, Laura, is the only publication to be referred to the censorshop board in the last five years and no publication has been banned since 2003
The Censorship of Publications Board cannot be abolished until a complaint about Minister for Justice Alan Shatters novel Laura is dealt with, the Dil has heard. The book is the only publication to be referred to the board in the last five years and no publication has been banned since 2003.
Fianna Fil justice spokesman Niall Collins called for the abolition of the board and said it was an outdated relic from a different era while time and the internet had passed it by.
Minister for Communications Pat Rabbitte said however that while abolishing the board and the appeal board was a sensible and overdue reform, a complaint had been made under existing legislation and it was only fair to give the complainant access to the board. Mr Shatters book was claimed to be obscene and to advocate abortion.
Mr Collins introduced the Censorship of Publications Board Repeal Bill to abolish both the board and the Censorship Appeals Board. He said 274 books and magazines are currently banned in Ireland. They include Amazing Detective Stories and Daring Romances, deemed obscene in the 1950s. They would not even merit a raised eyebrow on Fair City now, he added.
The term of office of the last board ended in 2011 and there have been no new appointees, which made it a lonely figure compared to all the other boards and quangos the Government had failed to abolish, despite pledges, he said.
He highlighted the cultural changes in Irish society with the evolution of technology, including e-books. Even Fifty Shades of Grey sold almost 60,000 copies in two months after its release here, he said of the explicit novel.
Formally rejecting the Bill, Mr Rabbitte said: Repealing part of the Acts while leaving the remainder in place should not be done without giving due consideration to the effects which this would have on the entire body of legislation.
Mr Rabbitte, for Minister for Arts Jimmy Deenihan, said the censorship of publications in Ireland has had a very sad and sorry history. Abolition of the boards appears to be a sensible and overdue reform but achieving this objective is somewhat more complex than is envisaged in the Bill.
Independent TD Finian McGrath supported the Bill and said he was delighted to see that romantic Ireland is not dead and gone in Fianna Fil. Sinn Fins Michael Colreavy described the censorship board as a ghost board.
Read the original post:
Complaint against Shatter’s novel has to be dealt with before censorship board abolished
Friday 24 January 2014 21.47
The Government has opposed the Censorship of Publications Board Repeal Bill 2013, which was put forward by Fianna Fil justice spokesperson Niall Collins in the Dil this morning.
Minister for Communications Pat Rabbittesaid it was a complex and technical area and that the Government would examine the matter.
Mr Collins said the response from the Government benches was "regrettable"and said he did not believe the minister outlined reasons why the bill was being opposed.
The Censorship of Publications Board was originally established in 1946 to ban the sale or publication of controversial publications.
Its five-year term of office expired in November 2011 and the new board has not been appointed yet.
There were chortles on both sides of the chamber when Mr Collins said the Censorship Board has had no members since 2011.
He said it has only been relevant once in the past five years - when it received a complaint about Minister for Justice Alan Shatter's novel Laura.
TOP STORIES
Story Comments
See original here:
Govt opposes call to abolish censorship board