Archive for the ‘Censorship’ Category

Unnecessary Censorship (SourceFed Edition) – Video


Unnecessary Censorship (SourceFed Edition)
Decided to have a little fun with some old SourceFed Videos. I do not own any of the media within, please check out and support the great team over at Source...

By: Carder Williams

See the rest here:
Unnecessary Censorship (SourceFed Edition) - Video

You Can’t Do That On Television ~ Censorship – Video


You Can #39;t Do That On Television ~ Censorship
You Can #39;t Do That On Television - Episode 101 ~ Censorship.

By: Felix Cooper

See the article here:
You Can't Do That On Television ~ Censorship - Video

Thousands People Protest Turkey New Internet Filtering Censorship Laws B T K Rules! – Video


Thousands People Protest Turkey New Internet Filtering Censorship Laws B T K Rules!

By: MynMobi

The rest is here:
Thousands People Protest Turkey New Internet Filtering Censorship Laws B T K Rules! - Video

Atheists File Lawsuit Following Alleged ‘Censorship’ of Material Attacking Christianity

ORLANDO An atheist activist group is suing one of the countrys largest public school districts after officials allowed some materials to be distributed, but prohibited items of a more controversial and explicit nature.

As previously reported, the Central Florida Freethought Community (CFFC) learned in January that a Christian ministry was distributing Bibles in Orange County high schools on Religious Freedom Day. According to a press release from Liberty Counsel, the Bibles were simply placed on tables in school lobbies and cafeterias, where interested students could take them if they so desired. Orange County is the nations 12th largest school district.

When CFFC learned of the Bible distribution, theyalong with support from the nationwide Freedom From Religion Foundationcountered with a plan to supply atheistic and anti-Christian literature to the same students. This plan was strategically executed in May onthe National Day of Prayer.

Why Women Need Freedom From Religion, Ten Common Myths about Atheists, and What is Wrong with the Ten Commandments? were some of the publications made available to students by the atheists. However, Orange County school officials prohibited the atheists from distributing other more controversial books and pamphlets, such as Why Jesus? An X-Rated Book: Sex & Obscenity in the Bible, and Jesus Is Dead.

Several of the prohibited books and booklets contain statements that were overtly anti-Christian. For instance, Why Jesus? examines the disturbing side of [Jesus] character, and Jesus Is Dead suggests that Jesus not only never rose from the dead, but he never lived in the first place.

In a letter to CFFC, school officials carefully outlined why they rejected several of the secular publications, citing inappropriate references to sexuality, gruesome surgical operations, prostitution, and other offensive language. The district pointed out how one book alone, titled Letter to a Christian Nation, includes overt references to sex, back-alley abortions, cannibalism, as well as the statements that God is the most prolific abortionist of all and that killing a fly should present one with greater moral difficulty than killing a human blastocyst.

However, now CFFC has announced that it has filed a lawsuit against the school district in response to the censorship of some of the materials. The 75-pagelawsuitclaims that the school district (the Defendants) severely violated the atheists (the Plaintiffs) constitutional rights.

Defendants violation of Plaintiffs right to free speech has caused, and will continue to cause Plaintiffs to suffer undue and actual hardship and irreparable injury, the lawsuit states. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law to correct the continuing deprivations of its most cherished constitutional liberties. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants continuing violations of Plaintiffs rights, Plaintiffs have suffered in the past, and will continue to suffer in the future, direct and consequential damages, including but not limited to, the loss of the ability to exercise their constitutional rights.

One of the primary claims in the lawsuit is that the Bible includes mentions of violence, murder, torture, and cannibalism. Since the secular publications are no worse, the atheists argue, they should be permitted.

However, Mathew Staver of Liberty Counsel suggested to local news affiliate WFTV that the atheists real goal is not to promote balance or fairness in public schools. Rather, it is to attack Biblical faith.

See the original post here:
Atheists File Lawsuit Following Alleged ‘Censorship’ of Material Attacking Christianity

China’s great firewall censorship architect retires citing ill health

Chinese anti-censorship campaigners have rejoiced at the news that the man considered to be the architect of the country's 'great firewall', Fang Binxing, has announced plans to retire his post after suffering ill health.

In a speech to graduating students at Beijing's University of Post and Telecommunication at which he holds a professorship, 53 year-old Binxing cited a serious illness as the reason for his departure.

"Due to excessive demands on my body, and without enough time to replenish, I have experienced a serious illness and lost the capacity to stay up working day and night," he said in translated comments on the University's website.

"I can no longer put both academic research and administrative duty on my shoulders. This is why I have told the authorities that I will not serve for another term.

No date for that departure has been confirmed but already some of his critics expressed satisfaction at the news.

We are glad that you are gone! read one of the more polite comments translated from a post on China's equivalent of Twitter, Weibo.

The technocratic Binxing has become a touchstone for unhappiness at the State's censorship of Internet content. In May 2011, a campaigner reportedly threw eggs and shoes at him during one of his speeches. Some months before that incident his growing unpopularity was underlined by the defacement of a blog he published. Such open expresions of disrespect were considered highly unusual.

If as appears the case Binxing is gone for good, the 'golden shield' censorship system he helped create will mark him out as the key figure in the early period of China's digital growth. Whether it survives in in the long term is uncertain but few expect any short-term relaxation of its filtering.

With US politicians angsting about possible spying backdoors in equipment from telecoms firm Huawei, Binxing was also one figure willing to accuse US companies such as Google and Cisco of playing the same game to carry out surveillance on China.

Link:
China's great firewall censorship architect retires citing ill health