Police Censorship In Bahrain Against Exhibition
Riot police in Bahrain have stormed an exhibition dedicated to the Arab Spring-inspired uprising in the Gulf nation, saying material inside was likely to inc...
By: VideoMedia
Read the original post:
Police Censorship In Bahrain Against Exhibition - Video
Thanks to the Internet, we now have access to more (and filthier) porn than any generation in history. And that porn is available in more places than you might imagine not least through the worlds largest online retailer. As Jeremy Wilsonpointed out in a recent article at the Kernel, Amazon sells material through its website that appears perilously close to glorifying incest and child rape. One particularly hideous title includes a mother being raped by her daughter; subsequently, the daughters syphilitic associate also rapes the mother, after which they sew her vagina shut. Another title features graphic descriptions of bestiality and underage sex, and includes a description of an actual rape presented as a fantasy for titillation.
Wilsons article focuses on self-published pornographic ebooks available through Amazon. It is but one of a number ofarticlesover the last few weeks that have expressed shock and revulsion at the vile trade in online rape porn, as a typically reserved Daily Mailheadline put its. Online retailers have responded with panic at the negative publicity. Amazon has engaged in widespread deletion of self-published books which, full disclosure, affects me directly, since Ive penned someebook naughtinessmyself. According to bestselling erotica writer Selena Kitt, her book Babysitting the Baumgartners, which Idiscussed on Salon, wasdeleteduntil she changed the title to Sitting the Baumgartners. WHSmith in Britain actuallytook its websiteoffline while it removed not just all erotic self-published titles, but all self-published titles, period. Kobo is also making sweeping deletions.
Interestingly, though, the titles I discussed in my first paragraph do not face either deletion or censorship. Thats because theyre not self-published. The daughter-mother rape is one of the most infamous scenes from the work of theMarquis de Sade. The other title, with the bestiality and underage sex, is Nancy Fridays My Secret Garden.
I asked Jeremy Wilson by email whether, given his feelings about self-published erotic ebooks, he also opposes Amazon selling work by de Sade and Friday. He responded that he had no problem with erotic material being sold on Amazon and I have no problem with books containing challenging and disturbing themes being sold. He added that, Im not interested in censorship or the state regulating works of fiction, but I would question the morality of anyone willing to profit from fetishized rape porn.
That seems reasonable, and certainly the ebook he mentioned in his email, whose title references both abduction and incest,doesnt sound like its likely to have much in the way of redeeming value. But the fact remains that if you are concerned about fetishized rape porn, its not clear why you would focus on some unknown ebook tucked away on Amazon rather than on the king of fetishized rape porn himself. If you think Amazon should not profit from the sale of sexual sadism, why is it okay for them to profit from the sale of de Sade? Or, as New York Times best-selling authorAphrodite Hunttold me after Amazon deleted all her books with the word Virgin in the title, They remove independent books, and yet those from big publishing houses are left intact. If you want to go after virgins, by all means, remove The Virgin Suicides too. Remove Fifty Shades. Why go after the little guy? Because we dont fight back?
Given the double standard, it does seem like self-publishers are singled out less because they have objectionable content (since the content is in fact available in non-self-published books) than because they have less institutional strength and less cultural respectability. There areserious booksabout de Sade andSacher-Masoch. Their work is published by established presses, and they are seen as scholarly and highbrow. In contrast, self-published ebooks are just crap rather like the lowbrow horror and superhero comics that Fredric Wertham pilloried in his infamous 1954 monograph Seduction of the Innocent.
Werthams book eventually resulted inself-regulationby the comics industry and several decades of enforced banality. One rule of the Comics Code stated that in every instance good shall triumph over evil. Another banned the use of the word horror in comics titles.
The reason Werthams criticisms were able to gain traction was in large part because comics were seen as being for kids. Erotic ebooks are not for kids, of course. But they are primarily aimed at another often infantilized group whose aesthetic choices arent taken seriously that is, women. Women are the main writers and consumers of erotic ebooks; Selena Kitt estimated that her readership is 80% female. As variouscommentershave noted, the Daily Mail is fine with publishing photos of scantily-clad women for their male readers. For that matter, Jeremy Wilson hasdefendedrevenge porn, in which men post real nude pictures of real women without the consent of those women in a deliberate effort toharass and intimidate them. Wilson in particular is arguing against state regulation, but he doesnt express any horror at the porn itself, as he does when writing about the ebooks, or suggest that people running those websites should be ashamed. Men terrorizing real women through for-profit websites is okay; women printing fantasies through for-profit websites incites moral panic.
Whats especially frustrating is that the things that make self-published ebooks so easy to attack are also the things that make them valuable. The fact that ebooks arent vetted in the usual sense results in a good number of grammar and spelling errors, but it also means that they can approach different kinds of content in different ways. It seems unlikely, for example, that Venus Santiagoscheerful lactation porn about the anxieties of working womenwould have found atraditional publisher. Qiana Whitted, an associate professor of English at the University of South Carolina and an avid erotic ebook reader, made a similar point in an email to me:
I think about an author likeTheodora Taylorwho self-publishes her interracial romance in what she calls the 50 Loving States series.along with enjoying her stories, I also appreciate the nods to the U.S. Supreme Court case on interracial marriage (Loving v. Virginia) and black playwright August Wilsons Century Cycle. So theres a somewhat specialized interest in Taylors books as well as the familiar characters of erotica fiction with assertive heroines. Could a series like this exist if it were not for digital self publishing?
View original post here:
Amazon’s porn censorship is inconsistent and unfair
While the freight train of Chinese development powers into the 21st century, complex social, political and economic forces are shaping a new China - one that President Xi Jinping hoped would be the foundation for a "Chinese Dream" when he made his inaugural speech as president in March 2013.
But while Xi and the Communist Party may speak from the highest platform, they are increasingly obliged to listen to a different national conversation - one that takes place on Sina Weibo, China's Twitter-like microblogging service, which doubles as one of the world's biggest rumour mill.
The government has now realised, especially with the emergence of social media, that media is just a battleground that they cannot afford to lose.
Bingchun Meng,London School of Economics and Political Science
Until recently, Weibo censorship has been a matter of stamping out sensitive terms as and when they emerge. Reports suggest the state may employ as many as two million "public opinion analysts" in this game of semantic "whack-a-mole".
However, since August, China's opinion police have begun to target the "rumour-mongers" themselves. A number of high-profile microbloggers - known in China as "Big V" bloggers - have been arrested and paraded on state TV - "Killing a chicken to scare the monkeys", as the Chinese proverb goes.
China is, in a way, caught between its Maoist past and its capitalist present which one can see in the devotion to industry that stains the skies over its mega-cities and scars the lungs of its people.
And it is there, too, in the media - where Beijing uses soft power to get its story out to the world (in English) - while cracking down hard on citizens who stray from the official version of events.
To discuss China's complex social media equation, we speak with Zhuang Chen, the editor of the BBC Chinese website; Chinese writer and journalist, Lijia Zhang; Xia Yeliang, a professor of economics at Peking University; and Bingchun Meng, a media lecturer at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Our Newsbytes this week: Egyptian satirist Bassem Youssef is on the airwaves and back in the firing line; Argentine President Cristina Kirchner scores a legal victory against the Clarin media empire; and a crackdown on critical radio in Somalia.
Read the original here:
Censorship in China: A game of cat of mouse
Social media giant Facebook has waded into one of Europe longest-running conflicts after it banned pages belonging to Turkey's largest pro-Kurdish political party.
The main page of the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) came down on Tuesday, October 29, following several warnings about posting content related to a Kurdish militia fighting in northern Syria and an interview with one of its deputies in which she spoke out for political autonomy of Kurdistan.
Facebook policy on censorship and the recognition of the Kurdish identity proved to be worse than that of Turkey, the party said in a statement.
Long running conflict
Turkey has been in conflict with the armed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) which began a war of insurrection in the 1980s seeking independence for swathes of Turkey's southeast, home to the majority of Turkey's estimated 14 million ethnic Kurds. That demand has since been downgraded to political autonomy for minorities. Still, the PKK is listed as a terrorist organization by the European Union, United States and Turkey.
The PKK declared a ceasefire in May as the Turkish government promised democratic reforms to recognize minority rights. Negotiations between the Turkish state and the PKK's jailed leader, Abdullah calan, are ongoing.
Facebook denies that the page came down over the use of Kurdistan -- a term that denotes a Kurdish homeland that encompasses territory in Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria.
Its statement from Facebook's European office to Deutsche Welle reads in full:
The BDP page was not removed for mentioning the word 'Kurdistan'. It is true that several BDP pages have been taken down from Facebook. This is because these pages have repeatedly breached Facebook's rules. These rules allow users of Facebook to post political content, including controversial views, but prohibit the posting of content that shows support for internationally-recognised illegal terrorist organisations [including the PKK].
BDP spokesman Cem Bico says the main page came down following the group posting of an interview with BDP's MP Sebahat Tuncel calling for political autonomy for Kurdistan. There is no mention of armed groups.
Read this article:
Facebook censorship of Kurdish political party
Social media giant Facebook has waded into one of Europe longest-running conflicts after it banned pages belonging to Turkey's largest pro-Kurdish political party.
The main page of the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) came down on Tuesday, October 29, following several warnings about posting content related to a Kurdish militia fighting in northern Syria and an interview with one of its deputies in which she spoke out for political autonomy of Kurdistan.
Facebook policy on censorship and the recognition of the Kurdish identity proved to be worse than that of Turkey, the party said in a statement.
Long running conflict
Turkey has been in conflict with the armed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) which began a war of insurrection in the 1980s seeking independence for swathes of Turkey's southeast, home to the majority of Turkey's estimated 14 million ethnic Kurds. That demand has since been downgraded to political autonomy for minorities. Still, the PKK is listed as a terrorist organization by the European Union, United States and Turkey.
The PKK declared a ceasefire in May as the Turkish government promised democratic reforms to recognize minority rights. Negotiations between the Turkish state and the PKK's jailed leader, Abdullah calan, are ongoing.
Facebook denies that the page came down over the use of Kurdistan -- a term that denotes a Kurdish homeland that encompasses territory in Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria.
Its statement from Facebook's European office to Deutsche Welle reads in full:
The BDP page was not removed for mentioning the word 'Kurdistan'. It is true that several BDP pages have been taken down from Facebook. This is because these pages have repeatedly breached Facebook's rules. These rules allow users of Facebook to post political content, including controversial views, but prohibit the posting of content that shows support for internationally-recognised illegal terrorist organisations [including the PKK].
BDP spokesman Cem Bico says the main page came down following the group posting of an interview with BDP's MP Sebahat Tuncel calling for political autonomy for Kurdistan. There is no mention of armed groups.
Originally posted here:
Facebook censorship of BDP