Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

Playing chess with thugs. Brittney Griner, Paul Whelan and the Wests challenge in combating hostage diplomacy by dictators – Toronto Star

His name makes headlines around the world. His plight is a cause clbre in Washington. But its in Moscow that his fate hangs in the balance.

On Friday, the family of Canadian-born Paul Whelan met U.S. President Joe Biden, who is seeking the former Marines freedom from a Russian prison, where he is serving a 16-year-sentence for espionage.

Whelan has decried the case against him as political theatre. But the star of this geopolitical thriller and his anxious family have never been so powerless.

There is a need to do something, anything, his twin brother, David Whelan, told the Star. What a lot of people do not bother to understand is that, unlike normal hostage takers, nation states that engage in arbitrary detention are free to do whatever they want.

Free, in other words, to open the cell door for the likes of Whelan and American basketballer Brittney Griner, who is serving a nine-year Russian sentence on drug charges, and swap them, perhaps for a Russian drug trafficker, perhaps for a spy and assassin.

Or, perhaps not.

President Biden has acted, making an offer to the Russian government, David Whelan said. Now we all have to wait to see if the Russians have the concessions they want, or if theyre going to keep Paul in their exchange fund for some other purpose.

Last April, after a concerted campaign to engage the U.S. government and convince Washington to negotiate with Moscow, the Russians agreed to free former Marine Trevor Reed, who was jailed for assaulting two police officers, in exchange for Konstantin Yaroshenko, a Russian pilot arrested in Liberia and convicted in New York for his role in a multinational drug trafficking plot unravelled by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency.

The exchange took place on the tarmac of a Turkish airport, like a scene from a Cold War spy film except that, in that bygone era, the two sides would heed to a diplomatic code of conduct an eye for an eye, a spy for a spy.

The most famous of those classic prisoner exchanges was the 1962 swap of the downed American spy-plane pilot Gary Powers for the convicted British-born Soviet spy Rudolf Abel, retold in the 2015 film Bridge of Spies.

The most recent was the 2010 exchange of 10 Russian sleeper agents living under assumed identities in the U.S. for four double agents held in Russian prisons. Among them was Sergei Skripal, the former spy who later survived an assassination plot carried out by Russian military intelligence agents using the nerve agent Novichok.

But the days of prisoner exchange as a settling of accounts, as an act of zeroing the geopolitical scales between the CIA and the KGB, have been replaced by the troubling trend of hostage diplomacy in which westerners are wrongfully detained and harshly sentenced by authoritarian regimes who seek the upper hand in their dealings with other nations.

Theres no rules here, said Jonathan Franks, a crisis management adviser who was a spokesperson for Trevor Reeds family. The taking of civilians as leverage in state-to-state relations is the next frontier in international arm-wrestling.

The Cold War resulted in numerous cases of western tourists, students or business travellers being arrested on trumped-up charges only to later be exchanged for captured Soviet spies, said David Silbey, an adjunct associate professor of history at Cornell University. But it was still a more organized situation under the Communist Party of the Soviet Unions watch than under Putin, who was himself a former KGB agent director of its successor agency, the FSB.

The Russia that exists now is a lot more of a single-person state, as opposed to a single-party state (under the Soviet Union), and I think its much more subject to the kind of chaotic behaviour of Putin especially.

The most glaring example of hostage diplomacy is that of the two Canadian Michaels former diplomat Michael Kovrig and consultant Michael Spavor who were arrested in China in retaliation for the arrest in Vancouver of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou on a U.S. extradition warrant.

The Canadian citizens were only released from prison in September 2021, after almost three years, when Meng struck a deferred prosecution agreement with American prosecutors and was allowed to return to China.

But their dystopian legal odyssey Kovrig told his wife upon being released he felt like he was coming into another world wasnt without consequence.

Gathering support from other nations

Outraged and powerless to secure the release of its detained citizens, Canada drafted a Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations as the tactic of hostage diplomacy is referred to in official circles.

The declaration condemns such tactics as a breach of human rights law and calls on governments who detain foreign nationals to respect the rule of law, ensure consular assistance, and take steps to prevent mistreatment and torture.

In the year since the declaration was introduced, it was endorsed by 70 states a little more than one-third of the world.

The use of joint declarations and diplomatic condemnations to combat what, in its crudest form, amounts to state-sanctioned kidnapping is part of the problem.

Part of it is that we play by rules, we have standards, rule-of-law principles, and part of it is and Im sure its true in Canada, too a lot of the people who make policy decisions here are the best and the brightest, said Franks. Theyre not necessarily equipped for playing chess with thugs.

If you want to fight back against thuggery, you might need different guys.

If a Canadian, American or British citizen is taken hostage somewhere in the world by al-Qaida, the Islamic State or Boko Haram, the governments have a full range of lethal military options to draw on as they attempt a recovery.

But swooping down under the cover of night on a foreign government is a recipe for war.

To address this limitation, the U.S. adopted the Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act in 2020, a law obliging Washington to assist wrongfully detained U.S. citizens abroad.

The law established internal guidelines for handling the cases, but also authorizes travel bans and sanctions against foreigners responsible for or participating in the ordeal of American prisoners.

Around the same time as Canada released its declaration against arbitrary detentions, Sarah Teich, a Toronto-based human rights lawyer, came out with a similar legislative proposal for Canadian lawmakers that was released through the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, a think-tank.

Teich said she drew up the proposition not in response to the detention of the two Michaels but after hearing about Kylie Moore-Gilbert, an Australian academic and colleague of Teich who was jailed in Iran for two years, from 2018 to 2020, on charges she was an Israeli spy.

Moore-Gilbert was ultimately released in a prisoner swap for three Iranians jailed in Thailand for a 2012 bomb plot that targeted Israeli diplomats.

The key tools in Teichs legislative proposal are sanctions against foreign nationals, an obligation for the government to work with and inform families of wrongfully detained Canadians, and the ability to co-operate with foreign states and reward helpful foreign citizens with asylum or Canadian citizenship.

The federal Conservatives included all three points in their 2021 election platform, but the political momentum for the legal changes weakened when Prime Minister Justin Trudeaus Liberals were re-elected on Sept. 20, 2021, and, four days later, Kovrig and Spavor were released from Chinese custody.

Your guy for my guy

For now, prisoner swaps are the fastest method for a country to free its arbitrarily detained citizens though still not the simplest.

The negotiations, I would say, are not what one might expect if you went to business school, cause the other side, at times, did not go to business school, Roger Carstens, the U.S. special presidential envoy for hostage affairs, said this summer in a hostage diplomacy panel discussion organized by the International Bar Association.

Whether negotiating with officials in Yemen, Myanmar, Venezuela or Iran, every case is strangely and uniquely different, he told the panel.

In the U.S., Carstenss team seeks input from family members and non-governmental organizations and U.S. lawmakers before assembling a hostage resolution team that consists of CIA and military, the Treasury Department and other government agencies to develop possible courses of action and determine what branch of a foreign government, or specific officials, have the power and willingness to engage in talks.

And even with all that expertise and preparation, Carstens said, the most important part of any negotiation plan is flexibility to adapt to the demands of the other side.

Fifty per cent of the time we walk out of the negotiation on the first go-around saying Oh my gosh! We absolutely did not see that coming, he said. No matter how much information we gather, the other side always has a trick up their sleeve that theyre going to employ.

In the case of Paul Whelan and Brittney Griner, the U.S. took the rare step this summer of confirming that it had made a significant proposal to the Russians reportedly offering to exchange arms trafficker Viktor Bout, a former Soviet military officer, for the Americans.

CNN later reported that Moscow was came back with a demand that a Russian spy named Vadim Krasikov, convicted by a German court of killing a former Chechen rebel commander in Berlin in 2019, be added to the deal.

From Moscows perspective, the impetus to repatriate its jailed intelligence agents is akin to the dictum that wounded soldiers should never be left behind on the battlefield, said Silbey, the historian.

This idea that you protect your own and not just for good-hearted reasons but also so that the next person who goes out to spy for you knows that youre not going to abandon them, he said.

From the western perspective, Sibley said, there are three types of prisoners: captured spies; ordinary citizens arrested on genuine or trumped-up crimes; and celebrity prisoners.

Someone like Griner, a two-time Olympic gold medalist, does create more leverage for the Russians because she is famous, she has celebrity and the ability of getting her story into the press in a way that ordinary Americans dont necessarily have, Silbey said.

In the cold calculus of prisoner-exchange poker, Griner might be the ace that shifts the balance and allows Moscow to increase its demands.

American officials are broadly confident that Whelan and Griner will eventually be released. They just dont know whether it will be sooner or later, or what price Washington will be forced to pay.

Others worry that a higher price tag paid for their freedom will increase the risk for other westerners by incentivizing and inspiring rogue and ruthless regimes to continue jailing innocents. Russian investigative journalists Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan suggested recently that the Kremlin was creating a bank of hostages to be used in future negotiations.

Franks said the West must find its own way to match the ruthlessness of the regimes in Tehran, Caracas, Beijing and Moscow while also respecting the rule of law and keeping its moral high ground.

We are never going to solve the problem until we find the courage to cause these people and the people that they love pain, he said, referring to government officials, prosecutors, judges, police officers, investigators and others who facilitate hostage diplomacy.

I mean that if youre an elite from a hostage-taking country you dont get to hide your kids in the West anymore. No more fancy boarding schools in the U.S. or the U.K. You dont get to seek safe harbour That sounds cruel, but there is no uncruel way to do this.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Anyone can read Conversations, but to contribute, you should be registered Torstar account holder. If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now (it is free)

Sign In

Register

Original post:
Playing chess with thugs. Brittney Griner, Paul Whelan and the Wests challenge in combating hostage diplomacy by dictators - Toronto Star

Chess.com Makes Offer To Play Magnus Group – Chess.com

Chess.com is excited to announce that we have submitted an offer for Play Magnus Group (PMG) to join Chess.com. Magnus Carlsen and the management at Play Magnus are enthusiastic and have accepted the offer. We expect that it will take about 6-8 weeks for this process to finalize. Until that time, Chess.com and Play Magnus will remain independent companies.

Both Chess.com and Play Magnus are thrilled by the prospect of working together to grow the game of chess and make even more amazing experiences for chess fans and players around the world. Once everything is final, we look forward to sharing our plans with the community regarding how we are going to work together to make amazing experiences for fans and provide more opportunities for creators. There has never been a better time to be a chess fan, and we believe the future of chess will be even brighter.

"This is a special time for chess. More people are playing and watching chess than ever before. Events like PogChamps, the Speed Chess Championship, and the Champions Chess Tour have changed the game forever. We believe there is an opportunity here to take chess to new heights by combining our efforts, and we are seizing that opportunity." - Daniel Rensch, Chess.com Chief Chess Officer.

We believe there is an opportunity here to take chess to new heights by combining our efforts.Daniel Rensch

"We've had a very positive experience talking about the possibilities for the future, and I'm very excited to be a part of it ... I'm excited to play in the Speed Chess Championship again. I have a score to settle." - Magnus Carlsen, World Chess Champion.

We've had a very positive experience talking about the possibilities for the future, and I'm very excited to be a part of it.Magnus Carlsen

Chess.com is a leading chess site with a community of more than 90 million members from around the world playing more than 10 million games every day. Launched in 2007, Chess.com has more than 400 remote team members focused on growing the game of chess.

Play Magnus Group was founded in 2013 with the goal of making the world a smarter place through chess and has established the popular Champions Chess Tour and a suite of entertainment and learning chess products.

See original here:
Chess.com Makes Offer To Play Magnus Group - Chess.com

WNBA playoffs 2022 – Is coaching chess match the X factor for decisive Connecticut Sun-Dallas Wings Game 3? – ESPN

9:00 AM ET

Alexa PhilippouESPN

Playoff basketball series are often decided by the chess match between opposing coaches, and the first-round showdown between the No. 3 seed Connecticut Sun and the 6-seed Dallas Wings has been no different. After Dallas' 6-foot-7 starting center, Teaira McCowan, struggled to get going in Game 1 -- a 93-68 Sun victory -- Wings coach Vickie Johnson changed things up heading into Game 2, bringing McCowan off the bench and starting Isabelle Harrison in her place.

The decision might have seemed minor -- McCowan still logged 24 minutes -- but it played a pivotal role in the Wings' ability to bounce back to take an 89-79 win and force a winner-take-all Game 3 at their place on Wednesday (9 p.m. ET, ESPN).

The Wings got news late Tuesday that leading scorer Arike Ogunbowale is probable Wednesday after missing the past six games with an abdominal injury. But how successfully the Sun can counter Johnson's move and ensure McCowan can't repeat her Game 2 success -- and how quickly McCowan and the Wings respond to that -- remains a deciding factor in determining which team advances to the WNBA semifinals next week.

McCowan's emergence -- in her first season with the Wings after being traded by the Indiana Fever this past offseason -- was a massive part of Dallas' surge down the stretch of the regular season. Since being inserted into the starting lineup after the All-Star break, the former Mississippi State star averaged 16.2 points and 10.0 rebounds in 26.5 minutes per game to close the regular season; those marks were 7.6/5.1/13.9 in her 20 prior appearances this season. Additionally, the 9.2-point differential per 100 possessions in Dallas' net rating with McCowan on the floor versus on the bench was the second-best mark for any Wings player, behind Allisha Gray's 14.1.

2 Related

The Wings went 8-5 following McCowan's insertion into the starting lineup, including 6-2 heading into the playoffs, and McCowan took home the first Player of the Month Award of her career in August.

But in Game 1, she was largely neutralized, part of the Sun's strategy to contain McCowan, Gray and Marina Mabrey.

With reigning MVP and perennial All-Defensive Team selection Jonquel Jones matched up against her, McCowan had a tough time getting to her usual spots and getting touches. McCowan finished with six field goal attempts (2-for-6 from the field), seven points and five rebounds. Defensively, she was primarily matched up against the uber-physical Swiss Army knife Alyssa Thomas, who could pull McCowan out of the paint and take her off the dribble -- not necessarily McCowan's strong suit.

The Sun finished Game 1 plus-16 in the paint and plus-7 on the glass, and they held the Wings to just seven second-chance points.

"There's no way we can win with Teaira only taking six shots," Johnson said after Game 1. "We've got to pound the ball inside and play inside out."

Johnson approached McCowan between Games 1 and 2 to see how she felt about being brought off the bench. It wasn't that McCowan was being punished or passed over for Harrison, Johnson said. Rather, it had everything to do with matchups.

In addition to starting the 6-foot-6 Jonquel Jones, the Sun have been bringing in 6-foot-3 Brionna Jones -- the WNBA's reigning Most Improved Player and a favorite for Sixth Player of the Year -- off the bench.

Jonquel Jones can match McCowan's length and has the edge in physicality. Johnson anticipated putting McCowan up against Brionna Jones would play to the Wings' advantage. And it largely did.

Harrison did her part in matching Jonquel Jones in Game 2, especially early on, while Kayla Thornton helped slow down Thomas. Then McCowan and Brionna Jones both checked in at the 4:35 mark of the first quarter and were matched up against each other the rest of the contest. Against a smaller and less mobile defender -- and with a renewed intention by Dallas to get the ball inside -- McCowan looked much more comfortable operating in the paint, finishing with 17 points (second best on the team) on 8-for-13 shooting, while also coming away with 11 rebounds, including eight on the offensive end, and three assists.

Play for FREE for a chance to win up to $5,000! Make Your Picks

"It was really to match B. Jones," Johnson said of the decision to change the starting lineup. "B. Jones came in, [McCowan] came in. That was the real focus behind everything. She had to match B. Jones, she's the person who can do it, and they went head-to-head the whole night."

McCowan and the Wings flipped the script from Game 1, beating the Sun on the glass (plus-3), narrowing the gap in points in the paint (minus-2) and doubling them up on second-chance points (23-11).

"It feels great knowing I can be on a team where they can use me in the way I'm supposed to be used," McCowan said, referring to her recent success with Dallas as compared to Indiana. "I feel like just coming in and staying true to my role, that's what I've been doing."

After a putrid first quarter in which the Sun managed just seven points, the Joneses still had solid performances offensively, finishing with 20 points apiece in Game 2. But defense and rebounding are what Connecticut built its success on this season, and the team felt that was lacking most of Game 2, part of what allowed McCowan to go off for a big night.

Brionna Jones admitted that the Sun need to improve their help defense around McCowan and do a better job of keeping her off the glass when the teams meet again Wednesday. If the Sun can successfully contain her and more broadly control the paint and boards, they're much more likely to advance to the semifinals for the fourth straight year.

And if Dallas is able to break through with the upset -- and secure the franchise's best playoff run since it was located in Detroit -- it'll no doubt be because of the work of McCowan and Dallas' other bigs in winning that battle.

"McCowan is so big to move that you've got to do your work early," Jonquel Jones said. "And once she gets in that position, the most you can do is just try to tip it out. We just have to be more proactive and do our work early."

Read the original here:
WNBA playoffs 2022 - Is coaching chess match the X factor for decisive Connecticut Sun-Dallas Wings Game 3? - ESPN

Chess: Harry Grieve, 21, wins British championship as seven-year-old shines – The Guardian

The final round game which decided the 2022 British championship at Torquay turned out to be a 75-move epic which had everything. Its protagonists were both Cambridge students: Harry Grieve, 21, mathematics, and Matthew Wadsworth, 22, economics. They were colleagues in their university chess club, but went for each other with zestful imagination in one of the best ever championship deciders.

A sharp opening with a material imbalance was followed by a knight retreat from f3 to its starting square g1, two exchange sacrifices, a winning king march, four queens on the board at the same time, and finally a queen sacrifice to force checkmate. It was a memorable encounter, worthy of its occasion.

Nick Pert, the defending champion, was runner-up on 7/9, half a point behind Grieve, while Wadsworth tied for third.

First prize was 5,000, more than double the norm of recent years, due to sponsorship from the chess learning company Chessable, which is part of the world champions Play Magnus Group. That could enable Grieve, whose stellar result gave him his first grandmaster norm (three are needed), to test himself on the European circuit in the next few years. He and Wadsworth, who also has one GM result, will both be aiming for their second norms in the Northumbria Masters at Newcastle this weekend.

Another test will come when the Cambridge pair take on Englands 2600+ GMs who played at the Chennai Olympiad and who did not compete at Torquay due to the near-overlap of dates plus possible jetlag. It will not be a foregone conclusion by any means, since Grieve and Wadsworth have momentum and youth on their side.

Away from the British Championship, two performances stood out at opposite ends of the age scale. GM John Nunn was a class apart in the over-65s, winning all seven games effortlessly and only twice being taken to over 30 moves. Some thought that Nunn should have opted for the championship proper, but that would have been a severe stamina test. His final-round win was elegant.

Kushal Jakhria, who has featured previously in this column, impressed again in the Major Open. The seven-year-old from the Pointer School, Blackheath, and Charlton Chess Club scored 5.5/8, winning every game as White, until a stomach upset before the ninth and final round stopped him short of qualifying for the 2023 Championship with 6/9. That would have been a world age record, breaking David Howells 1999 mark by almost two years.

Jakhria is also in contention for another world mark. He has just under two months to reach a 2000 ECF national rating, and thus surpass Abhimanyu Mishras US record of becoming the youngest USCF Expert, also a 2000 rating, at seven years six months. Mishra went on to become the youngest ever grandmaster at 12. Can Jakhria do it? His current rating after Torquay is around 1950.

Over in Miami, Magnus Carlsen duly won the $210,000 FTX Crypto Cup, although the world champion had a decidedly rocky passage. He lost four games in one day to his Nemesis, Jan-Krzysztof Duda, and three in a day to the fast rising 17-year-old Indian, Rameshbabu Praggnanandhaa. At the finish the leading scores were Carlsen 16/21, Praggnanandhaa and Alireza Firouzja 15.

Carlsen called his loss to Duda a horrible day of chess and more than once complained of fatigue. He now has a break until one of the most important tournaments of the year, the annual Sinquefield Cup, starts in St Louis on 1 September. There his opponents will include Ian Nepomniachtchi, the double Candidates winner who Carlsen recently refused to meet in a second world title match.

An all-grandmaster game ending decisively in 12 moves is a rare occurrence, but it happened in John Emms v Danny Gormally at Torquay after 1 e4 c5 2 c3 d6 3 d4 Nf6 4 Bd3 g6 5 dxc5 dxc5 6 e5 c4 7 Qa4+ Bd7 8 Qxc4 Ng4 9 f4 Nc6 10 Bc2 Qb6 11 Qe2 Nxh2 reaching the puzzle diagram where you have to find Whites 12th, which induced Blacks resignation.

3830: 12 Bb3! wins Blacks errant knight after 12...Bg4 13 Qe3 or 12...Ng4 13 e6!

See the original post:
Chess: Harry Grieve, 21, wins British championship as seven-year-old shines - The Guardian

Interviewing The Coach Of Olympiad Sensation Gukesh – Chess.com

GM Vishnu Prasanna is India's 33rd grandmaster. He has worked as a second to GM Baskaran Adhibanand has also coached many chess players since 2016 including GM Surya Shekhar Ganguly. India's second-highest-rated player, GM Gukesh D, is also his student and they have been working together for the last five years.

In this interview, Chess.com India talked with Vishnu about his coaching career as well as Gukesh's chess journey. The interview was conducted via a video call, and text has been edited for clarity or length.

Chess.com India: When did you start playing chess?

Vishnu Prasanna: (Laughs.) That was ages ago, maybe two decades ago. When I was about twelve years old, I joined the Solar Chess Club in Mylapore. My father taught me the initial moves.

When you were growing up as a player, did you have a role model or favorite players?

I was very much into cricket. So, my mother made me play chess because of GM Vishy Anand! He had won the FIDE World Cup in 2000 in Delhi at that time. I started chess because of Vishy and that's how it is for a lot of players in India. He is somebody I looked up to. Coming to favorite players, it keeps changing. My favorite player at that time was GM Garry Kasparov because of the literature I could read. Kasparov's books were the only accessible literature for me. I would say that Kasparov and Anand were huge influences. Currently, I feel that the favorite player keeps changing.

When and how did you enter the coaching field?

I started coaching somewhere between 2015 and 2016. In the beginning, it was just a way to support myself financially. It turned out that I have a knack for ita talent for it, I guess! In a way, I was always studying chess a lot. Teaching also helped me to put those things into thoughts, thoughts into words, and words that I could share with others.

One of my early students was IM Sidhant Mohopatra from Orissa. He was the first student who became a titled player. After that, a lot of people started asking me for training, and I continued coaching players.

Did you have a role model as a trainer?

No, not really. You can say that I was using my own mistakes to train. This is something that I learned through my mentorSrikanth Govind. It is a little bit about Bruce Lee's philosophy. Not teaching anything very specific but working with the individual.

Did you pursue coaching full-time, or did you combine it with your own tournaments?

It was never a plan to do only coaching. I always enjoy playing, and I'm still continuing to play. Most of my training is also very practical. Playing also helps me to stay in touch. I don't think I will ever stop playing.

Coming to the news of the hour: Gukesh! When did you first realize that Gukesh was special?

He had a very fine positional sense from early on. Our first group camp was in June 2017, and we had individual sessions in the next month. Two months later, Gukesh scored his first IM norm and also became an IM very soon after. We had early successes, and I felt that he was not an average kid for sure. You can never say how fast anyone is going to growthere are stumbles and things that could go wrong at any moment. I knew that he was very strong. For an 11-year-old, some of the moves he suggested were very difficult, and that was something.

Could you give an example or an instance from those early years that made an impression on you?

He was very positionally sound. He played in the center much more than most people I know. I come from a street chess/aggressive kind of school, but the boy was very sound. For instance, we looked at this classic game between Krogius and Smyslov. You expect Black to display some kind of aggression in the position and win the game through an attack, but Smyslov remains super patient with his play and slowly outplays his opponent. Special mention to the move: 20...Rfc8.

This move was quite natural to Gukesh at that point in time. Even as a player, it was not natural to me. So yeah, a lot of things like that. He obviously had weaknesses also, but these were anomalies. 20...Rfc8 is not what most 11-year-olds would spot in that position. They are more likely to spot ideas connected with tactics or tricks.

You were with Gukesh when he was rated 2200. You are now with Gukesh as he is 2700+. Can you review the critical moments of this journey from your perspective?

It is hard to pinpoint everything, but I'll share whatever I remember off the top of my head. The first big thing was his GM norm that he got at the Bangkok Open in Thailand which he got with a little bit of luck. He got lucky in his game against GM Nigel Short. It was not a clean win, but you need luck like that. It sometimes means that fate is helping you even when you are not ready. This was a big moment for him. Gukesh thought: "Maybe, I can become a GM very quickly."

Throughout that year, he kept working and made his remaining GM norms. He made his final GM norm in Delhi. Chasing the records plays on your mind, and Gukesh was fairly upset that he could not finish the final norm in Spain. He had an opportunity to do it there, but he eventually did it 17 days later in Delhi.

There were failures and disappointments, but his understanding improved from those experiences. He was struggling a little bit in a certain sense while he was between 2570-2580, but he was anyway strong, and so he continued to climb. I think that he was still making some practical decisions that could have been easily avoided. He managed to reduce unforced errors.

One of the recent critical moments for me was his performance in Armenia. He was playing really well and had climbed to 2640. Then he played two bad tournaments and came down to 2614. We decided that we had to regroup and do something serious in order to cross 2700. Actually, I thought he was ready and felt that if he maintained consistency, he would break the 2700 barrier. After Armenia, he knew he had to be consistent. He understood that losing a game at this level is a fairly expensive endeavor. So, he tried to focus on that aspect, and he has been doing brilliantly over the last few months. No complaints!

Do you set the goals, or does Gukesh set them on his own?

Gukesh decides for himself. I just say that it's a long journey anyway and ask him not to overestimate anything and keep his head in the zone. He is reacting to goals better. I think he responded much better to the 2700 goal, and he definitely didn't slow down there, which is always good.

What do you have to say about the strategy of playing in many open events in a row?

I think the strategy depends on the player. Everybody eats according to their appetite. So, that's something we also discussed. When he was very young, his appetite was higher. It still remains much higher than an average player, I guess. He still likes to play a lot. So, there's no need to argue with that or fight against that. I think if he can maintain that level, he can play a lot. There's nothing wrong with that.

What tournaments will Gukesh play after the Turkish League? (Gukesh is currently playing in the Turkish league.)

He will play in the Spanish League and the European Club Cup. If he is invited to play in the Tata Steel Chess India Rapid and Blitz (in Kolkata), he will play there, or he will play in the World Rapid and Blitz event.

So, that's a busy schedule ahead?

Yeah, definitely. Nowadays, it is very different compared to five years ago. The value of preparation and stuff like that... you can only do so much by sitting at home. Everything changes too fast. So, if you have the energy and appetite, you play.

You mentioned that you were expecting Gukesh to make the climb to 2700. So, you were not surprised by his progress in the last three months?

No, not at all. I was not surprised until the Olympiad. (Smiles.) Everything was fairly normal to me, and I thought that we were headed in the right direction.

How many hours does Gukesh practice chess?

We have never discussed such things. When the interest is there, you don't have to really worry about such things. I think most of the day is spent on chess. It is not just the physical hours he is sitting on the board. He is always thinking about how he can improve, and that's very powerful.

Gukesh didn't use an engine to help him prepare until he reached 2550. Was this a mutual decision or your approach?I told him that it is an idea he can pursue, and he is the only one who pursued my recommendation. I gave the recommendation as an idea. At the FM level, I thought it doesn't matter so mucheven at the GM level. There will always be many mistakes in the game. So I asked him to play for that and asked him to work on other things.

So, you are saying that he would analyze all the games and the mistakes on his own without help in checking the evaluations?

Yes! Just like the old times. Nothing new. Just like chess 15 years ago! I thought it would help him develop his own thinking process and would sharpen him faster.

Did you also use this idea in your own experience?

Yeah. I have tried not to use engines for most of the time in my life.

Gukesh had a few second-place finishes. How did you motivate him to win events after that?

That's not how we work. I believe that everything should come from the selfdiscipline or motivation. We always discussed that only number one matters. It has to be intrinsic, and that's how it has been for Gukesh. I think he is always keen on finishing first wherever he plays.

Shifting now to the 44th Chess Olympiad, did you speak to Gukesh after his soul-crushing loss to GM Abdusattarov Nodirbek?

I was not present at the venue, so I left him a message: such things happen in chess too. I think he has been there before, and this is not his first soul-crushing loss. So, I just left a message and I don't know if he even saw it.

He likes to be in his own zone during the event. So, I don't interfere with that. Vishy Anand had a long talk with him, trying to console him, and Gukesh even played the last round. I wasn't sure about that. When I saw the pairings, I thought, OK, he should be fine.

Where do you see Gukesh one year from now?

I don't really know yet, but I think he will still keep going forward. I don't know how far, but he will keep going in the next year. If he gets the opportunity to play with elite players, he will be up to it.

If you had to attribute the number-one skill to Gukeshs success, what would that be?His tremendous appetite for chessfor both studying and playing chess. I think that kind of appetite is absolutely necessary for what he has done.

Congrats on becoming a father recently. How has that changed you as a person and a coach?

As a coach, I don't know. As a person, you become more patient and become more aware of the little things. You pay more attention; it's a treat. There's nothing to complain about, and it's been a wonderful experience.

Regarding coaching, I have been mostly not doing much. I've only been in touch with Gukesh. I am heading an academy in Sivakasi and my own academy in Chennai. The academy at Sivakasi is set by the Hatsun company. I am the head coach there and have been managing the coaching for them. Personal training, well it is just Gukesh right now. I have been training with other players on and off, but not as much as I used to.

How do you upgrade your skills as a coach these days?

Through experience and interaction with others. When you meet a lot of people, you can see that they are also different. What worked for one person may not work for another. You try to see how else can you make the other player think or how else can you question them or how else can you prompt them to research. I think about the tools that don't exist but could exist and try to bridge that gap through the selection of positions, games etc. I think about what's missing between players of two levels. I'm usually on the lookout for such things. You can see that sometimes there's a pattern there, but most people don't see the same thing or most people could miss the same idea or most people of the same level could miss the same idea.

What are some recommendations you have for aspiring coaches?

That's a hard question! (laughs). Okay, they could start with Jonathan Rowson's books: Seven Deadly Chess Sins and Chess for Zebras. One of the books that had a huge influence on my chess understanding and chess coaching is Lasker's Manual Of Chess. It is a very deep book and one of the best chess books I've ever read, especially the part on positional play. Lasker explains how Steinitz came up with his theories and he also shares his arguments for and against those theories. I would also add GM Boris Gelfand's books.

As a coach, you have to look outside of chess also. Try to come up with your own training philosophy and work with that. The best way to train somebody is according to their belief system rather than yours. You help the student find their own compass and own parameters and assist them with that. Also, my belief is that the student is always a little bit smarter. So, I start from there. It is not always the case, but we have to start from there in my opinion.

Thank you for your time. We wish you the best in all your endeavors!

Thank you for having me. Nice to have this chat!

Special thanks to IM Rakesh Kulkarni for helping with the interview.

Follow this link:
Interviewing The Coach Of Olympiad Sensation Gukesh - Chess.com