Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

The Most Popular Chess Streamer on Twitch – The New Yorker

In the early afternoon of February 1st, the American chess Grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura was live-streaming to some of his 1.4 million Twitch followers, deciding how to approach his next online game: Do I play solid? he asked from a hotel room in Berlin. Or do I go for broke? He was in fourth place with just two games left in a blitz tournamentquick matches in which each side gets three minutes to moveand was debating between a sturdy opening likely to result in a draw or a dynamic one. I should try to win, he concluded, seconds later. His opponent was Jorden van Foreest, the twenty-sixth best player in the world and an adviser to the worlds best, Magnus Carlsen. Jordens being, like, uber, uber solid, Nakamura said a few moves in, scrunching his face. Its kind of annoying. He traded his knight for a bishop, exchanged knight for knight, and launched his queen into van Foreests position. A draw is just not good enough, he said. I cant do it, though. Then he had an idea. Im gonna try to win this. It probably doesnt work, but Im gonna try. With twenty seconds left, Nakamura unleashed an all-out attack, sacrificing his queen and sending forth two rooks and a bishop, coercing van Foreests king into a dismal retreat. Yeah, Im winning, Nakamura said, with a wry smile on his face. Chess is a tough game.... Chess is a tough game.

For most players, the statement is obviously true. For Nakamura, its not so clear. Born in Japan and raised in White Plains, New York, he became the countrys youngest American chess master at ten and its youngest Grandmaster at fifteen, besting Bobby Fischer for both distinctions. A year later, in 2004, he won his first of five U.S. Chess Championships. Known for an attacking style and a brash, arrogant manner, Nakamura became a controversial figure in the chess world. Are you kidding? he muttered to his opponent during a 2007 game, channelling more pro wrestler than chess scholar. Lets gocome on, come on, bring it.

Now thirty-four and possessing more emotional control, Nakamura is the most popular chess streamer on Twitch, where he is known for bulldozing top competition while answering questions from his chat, deciphering memes, and recounting move sequences in games that he played several years ago. In one Chess.com exhibition, he opened a new account, played every game with the Bongcloud Openinga dubious second-move king advancement dubbed an insult to chessand reached the sites top forty players anyway. He has beaten several Grandmasters ten times back-to-back, a defeat so humbling that its referred to as an adoption. Simply not falling victim to one is an immense honor. Thats it, thats it! the Grandmaster Eric Hansen bellowed after following nine straight losses with a win. You are not adopting me! Not today, not today!

It is partly because of this online notoriety that Nakamura was given a wild-card selection to the International Chess Federation (FIDE) Grand Prix, a series of three tournaments that decide two of the final spots in the Candidates Tournamentthe winner of which contends for the World Championship. A former world No. 2, Nakamura had not played a classical FIDE tournament since 2019, making him ineligible. But, considering his popularity, his strong online performances, his longtime standing among the worlds best, and pandemic restrictions, the FIDE president Arkady Dvorkovich gave him a pass. The chess community will be delighted to see him sitting at a chessboard again, he said.

Most were, but not everyone was. The Grandmaster Sergey Karjakins wife Galiya Kamalova called the FIDE wild-card selections a clown show and bemoaned Nakamuras admission. Its like a hockey player who hasnt skated on ice in two years, and instead played hockey online all the time, but hes still invited to play on the countrys real team, she wrote in a statement. Can you imagine such a situation in Russia or Canada? (Karjakin would later be banned from all FIDE competitions, including the Candidates, for six months, owing to his outspoken support of Russias invasion of Ukraine.) Some agreed, without using such bad analogies. Kamalova suggested the Russian Andrey Esipenko for one of the slotsan eighteen-year-old Grandmaster who had recently beaten Magnus Carlsen.

Many top chess players take pride inand are lauded fortheir extreme devotion to tournament preparation. They spend several hours a day studying chess openings, calculating minute advantages in numerous variations that can extend twenty or more moves deep. In an interview with HBO before the 2018 World Chess Championship, American Grandmaster Fabiano Caruana claimed to have memorized millions of moves throughout his career. Nakamura, on the other hand, spent a significant amount of time in the weeks leading up to the Grand Prix expressing how little he cared. In one stream, he floated that, if he won, he might give his spot in the Candidates to the Chinese Grandmaster Ding Liren. He assured his viewers that, on the off chance he qualified for the Candidates, his stream would continue. Im not stopping, you guys, he said, days before his first Grand Prix match. Measured expectations were reasonable. Nakamura had played thousands of online games, but they were almost entirely blitz and bullet matches. For the Grand Prix, each player would have ninety minutes for the first forty moves, with thirty seconds added per move. Nakamuras relative weakness in opening preparation is rarely punished in short time controls; in classical, opponents have time to calculate the best sequence of moves to exploit a mistake.

As fate would have it, Nakamura, who did not respond to requests for an interview, was placed in the same four-person preliminary group as Esipenko, who was invited after another competitor tested positive for COVID. After a draw in his first game, Nakamura defeated the Russian phenom with the white pieces. In a YouTube recap he posted that night, he could barely contain his glee. My strong suspicion is that Andrey was not really expecting the English Opening, said Nakamura, who typically moves his kings pawn first. Esipenko responded atypically, which Nakamura interpreted as an underestimation of his preparedness[He] figured, Well, Hikarus streaming all the time, probably I should surprise him. In a sport whose top players generally strategize in private, preventing competitors from glimpsing their thought process and preparation, Nakamura spent nearly half an hour explaining his moves and expounding on possibilities he considered and didnt end up playing even after spending hours that day at the board. If I were his coach, I guess I would not advise him to do it, the Grandmaster Benjamin Bok, who broadcast the tournament live on Hikarus Twitch channel, told me. But, I mean, Im only his commentator.

Nakamura beat the crafty Hungarian Grandmaster Richrd Rapport in the first of two semifinal matches. In the video detailing his second, he explained his philosophy. Now, one of the big differences between now and two or three years ago when I was playing chess professionallythats all I was doing for the most partis that I literally dont care, Nakamura said. What that means is that, in a lot of these situations now, Ill just pick a line and play it at the board. I will not worry about trying to pick the precise line or something that Ive looked at most recently. I will just choose to show up and play the line that I want to play. Chess competition is stressful, and being one of the best players in the world doesnt make it any less so. After a draw on day five of the tournament, Rapportwho won the second leg of the Grand Prix and clinched a spot in the Candidates weeks latergave an unrelentingly brutal post-match interview, in which he called himself his toughest opponent and pondered what he could have done with his life had he not devoted it to an underfunded, unforgiving game. I wish I had chosen something else, Rapport said. If I had put in a similar amount of time and energy over the years, I think Id be a happier person as of now.

It is only in this context that Nakamuras I dont care mantra approaches truth. Once hailed as the future of American chess, Nakamura has devoted his life to an ultracompetitive game, one that only two or three dozen people can make a comfortable living solely from playing. As he rose up the world ranks, he treated opponents like enemies and used criticism as fuel, becoming a highly disliked member of the chess scene. In online chess, where he was known for his blitz prowess since the two-thousands, he often accused opponents of cheating and fired off nasty messages after losses. The I literally dont care mantra itself is a reference to Nakamuras bitter reaction to a fluke online loss in which he repeated the phrase many more times than one would expect from someone who literally did not care.

Nakamura is not famous for his introspection, but, sometimes, in the course of hours-long streams, it comes out. For much of my career, much of my life, Ive sort of been the bad guy. Im not someone whos been liked, he said, in August, 2020, diverting his gaze from the camera. Ive always been perceived as the person who people dont want to root for, who people dont like. So, to have all the support from you guys, to sort of know that there are fans who do support me, it does mean a lot. In regular competitive chess, Nakamura likely gets a mental edge from knowing that, even without top results, he can still make a living from streaming sponsorships. When a single mistake during a several-hour game can lead to a quick downfall, its also nice to have people who wish for your success. For the first time in his career, he has this huge fan base thats behind him, the Grandmaster and streamer Daniel Naroditsky told me. And thats giving him confidence. I think, when Hikarus confident, hes absolutely unstoppable.

Read the original:
The Most Popular Chess Streamer on Twitch - The New Yorker

Rank and File | ETHS teams finish second at High School Chess Nationals – Evanston RoundTable

The Evanston Township High School Chess Team had its best national performance in years at last weekends National High School Championships in Memphis. The 18 player team won two second place team trophies in the Under 1900 and Under 1600 sections, the second and third strongest of the tournaments six divisions.

ETHS players also won individual awards in four of the tournament sections. Elie Platnick defeated a National Master on his way to a 22nd place finish in the Championship section. Jonah Chen placed 11th in the Under 1900 section, Luca Zerega placed 28th in the Under 1600 section, and Peter Kezdy tied for first place (third on tiebreak) in the 232-player Unrated section.

Zerega was an alternate on the ETHS team at last years IHSA State Finals but improved play moved him up to board 7 on this years IHSA State team. Last weekends tournament results were his best yet, and the following game, from Round 5 (of 7), helped secure his teams second place finish and his individual award.

White: Luca Zerega, ETHS

Black: Raghavan Madabushi, Alabama

1e4 e5 2Nf3 Nc6 3d4 cxd4 4Nxd4 Nxd4?! Its better for black to play 4Bc5 to attack whites knight, or 4Nf6 to attack whites e-pawn.

5Qxd4 d6 6Nc3 Qf6 7Be3 Zerega could have played 7Qa4+ to avoid trading queens, but this move also gives white an advantage.

7Qxd4 8Bxd4 Be6

White to Move

9Nb5!? This move threatens Nxc7+, forking blacks king and rook.White could have played for a safer advantage with 9Nd5, 0-0-0 100-0-0, when white would occupy more space and have more active pieces than black.

9c5? Black should have defended the c-pawn by playing Kd7 or Kd8.

10Nc7+?! Kd8 White misses a complicated sequence of moves that would have given him a winning advantage. After 10Nxd6+ Bxd6 11Bxg7, white temporarily wins a rook and two pawns in exchange for his knight. Now black can play 11f6 to trap whites bishop, but white stays on top with 12Bxh8 Kf7 13Be2 Ne7 14Bh5+ Ng6 15f4! Rxh8 16f5. White loses his bishop but wins blacks bishop or knight.

White to Move

11Nxa8?! White wins blacks rook but loses a bishop, and his knight is trapped on a8.It was safer to play 12Nxe6+ fxe6 13Bc3, when whites two bishops are more active than blacks bishop and knight.

11cxd4 120-0-0 Kc8 13Rxd4 Kb8 14 Bc4 Kxa8?! Black should have played Be7 or Ne7 before placing his king in the corner or the board. Now white can take advantage of the black kings position by playing 15e5! If black captures the e5 pawn, white plays Rd8+, which leads to checkmate.

15Bd5?! Nf6? 16Bxe6 fxe6

White to Move

17e5! White now gains a passed pawn, since black gets checkmated if he captures the pawn on e5.

17Nd7 18exd6 g6 19Re1 e5 20Rd3 Kb8 21c4 White plans to support his passed d-pawn. White has an even stronger, but hard to find, plan involving his d3 rook 21Rf3 Kc8 22Rc3+! Kb8 23Kb1! Rg8 24f4, threatening blacks e-pawn.

21Bg7 22b4 Rc8 23Rc3

Black to Move

23Bf8? A better defense for black is 23b6 to restrain whites c-pawn.

24Rd1?! White should immediately play c5.

24Rc6?! 25c5 Bh6+?! 26Kc2 Bg5 27Kb3 b6 Blacks delay in playing b6 has allowed white to activate his king, giving him a decisive advantage. Zerega now seals his win with strong endgame play.

White to Move

28cxb6 Rxc3+ 29Kxc3 axb6?! 29Nxb6 would prevent whites next king move, but white can still penetrate blacks defenses by playing Kd3 and Ke4.

30Kc4 Kc8 31a4 Bd8 32Kb5 Kb7 33a5 bxa5 34bxa5 Nb8 35Rd5 h6 36Rxe5 Bxa5 37Re7+ Kc8 38d7+ Kd8 39Re8+ Kxd7 40Rxb8 Winning blacks knight moves white closer to victory.

40Bc7 41Rh8 h5 42h3 Ke6 43Rf8 Be5 44Kc6 Bf6

White to Move

45Ra8 White could also have played 45Rxf6+ Kxf6 46Kd6 to simplify into a winning king and pawn endgame.

45h4 46Ra4 g5 47g3 hxg3 48fxg3 Be5 49g4 Bg3 50Kc5 Ke5 51Kc6 Bf2 52Ra5+ Kf4 53Rf5+! Kg3 54Rxg5 Kxh3 55Rg8 Kh4 and white went on to win. Black eventually has to give up his bishop to prevent whites pawn from queening.

White to Move

Link:
Rank and File | ETHS teams finish second at High School Chess Nationals - Evanston RoundTable

Club of the Month: Road to GM – Chess.com

Welcome to the second Chess.com Club of the Month article! This series gives our readers the chance to know a few of the incredible communities we have on Chess.com and learn more about what they do and who they are. It might even give you the inspiration to start your very own club or tips to take your current club to the next level.

We're pleased to announce that April's Club of the Month is Road to GM. With2,788 members at the time of this article, this club has been brimming with positive energy for over two years now:

Chess.com: What is your name and what is your role at your chess club?

Nightly-Knight: I'm Nightly-Knight, the organizer/overseer of events for Road to GM.

How would you describe your chess club?

"GM" in our case actually stands for "Great Mindset." We believe that when you're in possession of a truly great mindset, you're unbeatable. In our club we try to mingle learning, fun, and mindset into one big massive ball. The Great Mindset also includes the skill and self-belief you need to win, and the fun you have doing it.

Can you share the history of your club with our readers?

Road to GM began November 12, 2019, but its roots date back even further.

Back in 2019, you couldn't create a club without a membership. Since the creator of the club (joseph7505) was not an upgraded member, the club could not be formed. However, both myself and joseph7505 had staff roles in clubs and were gaining experience administrating them.

In August 2019,a friend of joseph7505's let him take control of a club he had made. This club, which was called Variant Pros, is considered the forefather of R2GM because it really taught us a lot about how to manage a club.

In November 2019, another friend gifted joseph7505 a membership, and Road to GM wassoon founded. We've been running the club together ever since, and nowon the verge of finally reaching 3,000 memberswe have an awesome team to help us!

What inspired you to take a leadership role in your chess club?

Creating live tournaments was the true reason that we wished to create a club in the first place back in 2019. Being able to host chess events was a glorious dream for us, and it has now become a reality with us hosting an average of 60 live tournaments each month.

Each tournament is diligently analyzed by staff, and points towards our all-star event, the Membership Race, are granted as a result.

Does your club meet in person? If so, where and when can prospective members find you? If not, when do you typically have events online?

Since Road to GM's members are spread out all over the world, we don't meet in person, but we do regularly host tournaments every day of the week at many different times each day.

We are also regularly holding our Mentor-Mentee Program, hosted by jg777chess. This is a free coaching program, and members get experience as they coach (and are coached by) other members at completely no cost.

What separates your chess club from other clubs?

We've been singled out in the past and noted as being one of the most positive clubs on the site, due to our constant support of our members.

The Road to GM community has been proud of being such a positive club. The admins are cheerful people who are dedicated to bringing chess to you. We have constant Daily Matches, frequent Vote Chess where the discussion level is awesome, and Multi-Club Arenas once or twice a week. On top of that, we host a plethora of live tournaments weekly. I don't know another club that has more tournaments than us.

What Chess.com tools do your members use the most?

Analyzing games plays an integral part of our culture at R2GM. We offer memberships to winners of our events, and through this we give them the ability to analyze even more.

We also play a lot of daily matches. At the beginning of the year, we made a goal of reaching number 500 on the leaderboard for daily matches by March 22, 2022. We were at number 763 at the time, so had to make up 263 places. Although we did not make the goal, we did manage to be number 583, which was almost a 200-place jump in only three months.

What advice would you give to clubs on Chess.com that are just starting out and would like to grow?

Don't start out by messaging every username you get your hands on. Start with 20 or so members you could get in your first week; 20 members are plenty to start. You can organize a star feature of your club, and you will be surprised how much it grows when you have fun things to do. The biggest tip in growing a club is to retain your members.

Thanks to Nightly-Knight and his fellow Road to GM members for providing us with their answers for this month's article. Make sure you check out their page on Chess.com!

If you'd like to nominate a Chess.com club for our next Club of the Month article, fill out the nomination form here.

See the original post:
Club of the Month: Road to GM - Chess.com

Nakamura On Quick Draw With So: ‘There Was Little Incentive’ – Chess.com

"At the end of the day there was little incentive," GM Hikaru Nakamurasaid about his quick draw against GM Wesley So in the final of the third leg of the FIDE Grand Prix.Both players commented on it in an interview after the tournament, and Nakamura also posted his point of view on Reddit, providing a rare insight into the mind of top GMs regarding quick draws and incentives.

The second classical game of that Grand Prix final between Nakamura and So, played last Sunday, featured one of the well-known opening variations that can lead to a peaceful result right from the start.In this case, it was the Berlin variation of the Ruy Lopez, named after the city where the players were playing their game.

The position after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0-0 Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.dxe5 Nxb5 7.a4 Nbd4 8.Nxd4 Nxd4 9.Qxd4 d5 10.exd6 Qxd6 after which the game quickly ended in a draw by move repetition:11.Qe4+ Qe6 12.Qd4 Qd6 13.Qe4+ Qe6 14.Qd4 Qd6.

This line has been used a lot at the top level recently, especially in online play. If you look into the database starting from 2020, there are 87 games where this line was played with at least one player rated 2700 or higher. In 82 of these games, the draw was agreed right away by move repetition. Only in five games, the white player avoided the repetition which led to four decisive games. Overall, it is safe to say thattop players may use this line to force a draw right from the start.

Nakamura himself was involved in almost half of these 87 games. He played it 20 times from the black side and 23 times from the white side. So was involved in 32 games, using it 12 times to draw as white, while with the black pieces he drew 19 times and even won one game.

Before the Berlin final last weekend, Nakamura and So drew 11 games, all online, between themselves using this variation. Nakamura was playing the white pieces six times; So had white five times.

It should be noted that from this sample of games since early 2020, 80 were played online. Two over-the-board games were rapid or blitz. The five classical games that saw this line were:

Seeing this quick draw in a classical game was quite rare, and prompted a journalist working for the Austrian chess magazine Schack-Aktiv to ask Nakamura if he doesn't think a player has a "responsibility" for spectators in Berlin who "paid money and sometimes came from far away."

In his direct response on camera, Nakamura said that the tournament format gave him little reason to play for more, especially since he had already qualified for the FIDE Candidates Tournament by reaching the semifinals:

"I'll just answer it very simply. I think it's on World Chess and FIDE to have a better format. I think it's that simple. The fact is, if you look at the first event for example [also in Berlin, in February - PD], where I played with Levon [Aronian], there was a lot of tension, there were no quick draws. It's up to the organizers to come up with a format that makes sense. By the semifinals even, to be honest, I wasn't even studying chess because there was nothing really to do. I just show up and try to make some draws and that's that. Because, already, the main thing everybody is playing for is to qualify. I think you can say that it's on the players, but I could also say the other way. The first game, Wesley played something that objectively can lead to a draw instantly as well. I think it's on the organizers, not the players."

So, who was standing right next to Nakamura, gave his two cents as well:

"I must also add that that's the nature of the game; the majority of chess games really end in draws. If there is a way to eliminate draws and just have decisive results every single game, I must say I am all for that, but you must understand that as a professional chess player we see one tournament as a whole. It's our 13th day. We don't take it one game, one event, so basically we have another game the next day so you got to think of the tournament as a whole, you gotta preserve your energy, also you gotta prepare, sleep well. Also, I was thinking about yesterday: we're paid not for playing, we're paid based on our performance, so if I had lost yesterday then I wouldn't have been here and vice versa."

The interview with Nakamura and So. Video: World Chess.

The journalist then suggested that Nakamura (as White) chose to play the quick draw because he was also playing in the Chess.com Rapid Chess Championship later that day, but Nakamura denied that that was the reason:

"I would have made a quick draw anyway, even if there wasn't a tournament in the evening. I think some people will probably start talking about ratings again as well. The simple fact is that at the end of the day there is one rating that matters the most and that is the classical chess rating, not the rapid or the blitz rating. At this point, with nothing to play for, what are you gonna do? I was already very tired at that point."

In a post on Reddit, Nakamura clarified things a bit more. Here it is in full:

I will leave a comment here on this thread with some basic truths. Applicable to most top-level events.

Objectives:

1. Main goal of the Grand Prix/Tournament (qualify for candidates/win). Obviously decided a week ago.

2. Conserve classical rating if possible/no risk without anything on the line. Invitations are generally based off of rating so this is NOT insignificant.

3. We both played for something like 14 days in a row without a break. Being tired with little incentive is also what led to this.

I will end by stating that at the end of the day there was little incentive and if I'm being honest, nothing is going to change for anyone based on rapid/blitz ratings. However, you could miss out on invites if you lose points in classical on a random non-essential game. End of the day, the incentives for events/games as opposed to maintaining the classical rating isn't there. Unless prizes are 2xed or 3xed for otb tournaments, this is never going to change. There will always be situations with quick draws.

Also, most people don't seem to understand how rare/valuable new ideas are and to use it in such a situation makes zero sense for me with the candidates coming up, and Wesley would much rather use it in the America's Cup.

The variation in the Berlin Ruy Lopez is not the only line used by top grandmasters if they are happy with a draw playing white. Generally speaking, it happens from time to time that games end in a draw without a real fight. Many top tournaments have introduced rules where draw offers are not allowed before move 30 or 40, but these opening variations can side-step that because of the three-fold repetition rule.

Especially for events that are part of the world championship cycle, FIDE tends to be conservative with changing rules, and indeed, as So pointed out, draws are part of the game. Whether it's a big problem that top players draw games at a classical time control using a known variation, is something the chess community has to decide and up to organizers to deal with. A full ban on such variations is not expected to be implemented, if onlybecause players will find other ways to draw the game if both are happy with that result. If draws should be banned altogether is another story.

See more here:
Nakamura On Quick Draw With So: 'There Was Little Incentive' - Chess.com

Kasparov In TED Talk: ‘Meeting Evil Halfway Is Still A Victory For Evil’ – Chess.com

"Ukraine is now on the frontline of the global war of freedom against tyranny," was one of several powerful quotes from GM Garry Kasparov in a TED Talk published on Tuesdaythe day before his 59th birthday today. The pro-democracy activist and human rights advocate, who retired from chess as the world number-one player in2005, predicted Russia's war in Ukraine rather accurately in his 2015 bookWinter is Coming.

Kasparov's TED Talk on the war in Ukraine.

The central theme in Kasparov's TED Talk is good and evil. He notes that he identified evil at an early age, when as a young chess star he had the privilege of traveling outside of the Soviet Union and to the West, to the other side of the iron curtain. "It was obvious to me very quickly that they were the free world and we were not, despite what Soviet propaganda told us."

Kasparov mentions that he got into "good trouble" for his criticism of his own country and his praise for America in a famous interview he gave to Playboy magazine in 1989. The following quote, taken from chesshistory.com, must have been what he was talking about. Now 33 years ago, Kasparov answered the question why chess was so popular in the Soviet Union:

"Because most of the time, theres nothing else to do in our country! Chess fits the Soviet Union perfectly. Its the simplest of sports. You dont need a special field or court for it. Just a chess set, pieces, and a quiet place in the park. Its the easiest way for people to have a little bit of enjoyment. And if you become a strong player, chess is one of the best ways for a Soviet citizen to improve his life, to get a better position and maybe raise his standard of living above the averagewhich is not so good, by the way."

Kasparov's early activism included his demand to play under the Russian flag instead of under the Soviet hammer and sickle in his 1990 world championship with GM Anatoly Karpov. That was a year before the USSR disintegrated. Until the present day, the difference in ideology between the two adversaries on the chessboard continues: as a member of the State Duma, Karpov is supporting the Russian government while Kasparov is strongly opposing it.

Since the day Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, Kasparov is being taken much more seriously by mainstream media than before. The former chess champion has been invited dozens of times in the past month by international media to share his views. As it turns out, Kasparov's Winter is Coming, with the subtitle "Why Vladimir Putin and the enemies of the free world must be stopped," was much closer to the truth than most people wished to believe.

Kasparov: "If I wrote a sequel, it would be called Winter is Here. And the subtitle would be: I [bleep]'ing told you so."

According to Kasparov, the warning signs from Putin came early, but the world failed to listen properly.

"When Putin said there is no such thing as a former KGB agent, I knew Russia's fragile democracy was in danger. When Putin said that the collapse of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century, I knew Russia's newly independent neighbors were at risk. And when Putin talked at the Munich security conference in 2007 about a return to spheres of influence, I knew he was ready to launch his plan."

Kasparov mentions the Second Chechen War, Russia's invasion of Georgia in 2008, and the invasion of Crimea in 2014, and notes: "It's a paradox, isn't it? Dictators lie about everything they have done but often they tell us exactly what they are going to do. Just listen!"

Having been told since 2005 that politics is "not black and white, not chess" and that politics requires compromise, Kasparov shows images of destroyed cities and corpses in the streets in Ukraine, and asks: "Compromise? Are you sure? Compromise with this? You cannot look at the images from Ukraine in recent weeks and say there is no pure evil."

Showing an image from The Lord of the Rings, Kasparov argues that pure evil is no longer reserved for fiction while noting the difference with pure good: "There is no pure good. If anyone says they know what pure good is, it's probably evil. (...) Good will disagree. Evil says: no more disagreements, ever. That was life in real Mordor: the Soviet Union. That's what Putin wants for Russia and the world."

As is also clear from his many tweets in the past month, Kasparov is not satisfied with the support from the western countries for Ukraine, which mostly consists of economic sanctions toward Russia and providing weapons and humanitarian help.

"The price of stopping a dictator goes up with every delay, every hesitation," says Kasparov. "Meeting evil halfway is still a victory for evil. Evil tempts us with our weakness, with our desire for comfort."

Go here to read the rest:
Kasparov In TED Talk: 'Meeting Evil Halfway Is Still A Victory For Evil' - Chess.com