Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

The joys of OTB chess: Nisipeanu wins the Benasque Open – Chessbase News

The German top player Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu is not particularly fond on online chess and the corona lockdown forced him to take a long break from tournament chess. But now over-the-board chess is coming back to life and the German-Romanian Grandmaster's visibly enjoys it. That's the only way to explain his outstanding result at the Open in Benasque.

In 2021, the tournament in the small Spanish Pyrenean village, whichwas held for the first time in 1981, celebrates its 40th anniversary. Tourism is important for Benasque, a village which has long been difficult to reach, but is picturesquely embedded in the mountain ranges of the Pyrenees, and the Open contributes to tourism. Despite the remote location, the event has always attracted a lot of players.

This year, almost 300 players took part, most from Spain, some from the nearby mini-state of Andorra. Two players started under the flag of Venezuela though they probably did not travel to the Pyrenees especially for this tournament. With 18 Grandmasters and 20 International Masters the field was also strong.

Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu won the ten round Swiss with the sensational score of 9.0/10 and achieved a performance rating of 2771. On his way to winning the tournament, Nisipeanu played against five grandmasters and scored 4 points against them.

In the following nice and brutal win against a fellow Grandmaster Nisipeanu showed his attacking skills:

The two young grandmasters Jesper Sondergaard Thybo from Denmark and Gergely Kandor from Hungary, both born in 1999, also had a good tournament. They both scored 8.0/10 shared the second and third prize.

Translation from German: Johannes Fischer

See the original post here:
The joys of OTB chess: Nisipeanu wins the Benasque Open - Chessbase News

Where do you play chess online? – thedailyguardian.net – thedailyguardian.net

The computer and the Internet are perhaps the most powerful technical duo we have today. The access to the information we have thanks to the network of networks, combined with the increased capabilities of todays home computers, we can be in a world that years ago was just science fiction.

It is clear that man, who is a playful being, uses, for example, the capabilities of current computers to create all kinds of games, but when the Internet came into our lives, things became more changeable and more powerful. For example, with the pandemic, the sites where video games are played have grown exponentially. Incarceration has accomplished what no promotion or advertising could, which is why it is now so common to know many places where all kinds of video games are played.

It is clear that chess cannot ignore this, and although there are already specialized sites for playing online chess, many of them have become very popular. Today we are going to talk about three of the best places to play chess, which can be used 24 hours a day and that allow you to study, play and practice the great game of science. Two of these sites are commercial and the other one is free, so well see if there are any major differences between them.

Were talking about Chess.com, Chess24.com and LiChess.org. They all allow chess players to sign up for free, a matter that only takes a few minutes. Once someone gets to these sites, there is a list of activities where you can play against a computer at different levels, study tactical situations, enter the part where we can challenge and play with other people who may be in any part of the world. In addition, we can play an incredible number of rhythms, from the slowest (not very popular), to those in which we have a meditation time of no more than one minute in the whole game (bullet rhythm, very popular, to all this).

Tournaments can also be organized on these sites and the system keeps track of who is playing against, the results achieved in the games played and the list of results. The wiggle room for these programs is really amazing because the organizers leave the program practically to solve everything. Come on, there is an anti-cheat system that analyzes the games played by humans and notes how close the players movements are to a powerful chess program. If there are a lot of matches, the system will likely identify those who appear to be using outside help and even exclude them from the tournament being played.

On commercial sites, those who pay their monthly fee, which is about $8 per month, have access to more chapters and information than those with a free account. However, none of the three sites we reviewed are limited to players in their chess games. In fact, it must be said, on these sites, the system keeps an account of the games played by each member, their scores, as well as memorizing the full games, making this a library that we can refer to for our progress

LiChess.org is free and does not charge anyone any fees. Everyone who signs up has all the features of the system and it is good to start on this site if you do not want to shell out any amount of money. On the other hand, Chess.com and Chess24.com have premium (paid) accounts, and provide more information for those who register and pay. There are video classes for paid subscribers, tournaments, access to occasionally play with big masters, etc.

In the opinion of the writer, there are no significant differences between these sites, especially when it comes to online gaming. For classes, videos and more specialized information, paid sites are great for the quality of the material they offer but nevertheless LiChess.org has endless alternatives that dont make it bad, on the contrary, it is probably the best platform to get started in the chess world Online.

But I will give the reader, or reader, a recommendation: sign up for these sites and see which one works for you, which one seems easier to use. Play constantly and you will soon see that it becomes addictive (healthy).

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/es_LA/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.7&appId=785979025297911"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Go here to read the rest:
Where do you play chess online? - thedailyguardian.net - thedailyguardian.net

The Dark Side of Chess: When Is a Grandmaster Not So Grand? – The New York Times

Malinin, who died in November, always denied paying for results. But in a letter published in Russian on an obscure chess website, he acknowledged playing an unusual role in the Sudak tournament.

The most notable game, he said, was one he agreed to lose.

Malinin told the story this way in his letter:

With Karjakins title as the worlds youngest grandmaster slipping away after his unexpected draw with Semyonova, Karjakins father, Aleksandr, approached several players to whom his son had lost points and offered them money to replay their games. Firman said he was among those to receive an offer of cash for an arranged draw.

Malinin, who had points to spare, agreed to replay his game with Karjakin. He said he did so for free and therefore did not consider it cheating. The two replayed a game that normally would have taken up to six hours; in the replay, Malinin said, it was played in a blitz a high-speed variant of chess. Karjakin won.

Minutes later, the newly crowned grandmaster ran into the tournaments main hall, radiant and proud as a peacock, according to Areshchenko, who was present.

Asked about the episode in an interview with The New York Times, Karjakin said he would ask his father about it. He later said that he is not in touch with his father and had no further information about the tournament. Phone calls and text messages sent to Karjakins parents were not answered.

The fruits of Karjakins victory, though, came quickly. The next year, he played at the tournament in Wijk aan Zee in the Netherlands, a town known as the Wimbledon of chess. In Paris, he joined the prestigious NAO chess club. Only a few months earlier, Karjakin had traveled to tournaments in Europe by bus. Now, as the worlds youngest grandmaster, he was greeted by the president of Mexico.

I was just swarmed with invitations, Karjakin said in an interview, talking about the aftermath. I became widely popular.

Read more here:
The Dark Side of Chess: When Is a Grandmaster Not So Grand? - The New York Times

No-Castling Chess: Anand held to draw by Kramnik, all to play for in decider – Hindustan Times

In an English Defence game, Anand, playing white, got into an advantageous position and piled on the pressure on the Russian in game three late on Saturday.

PTI |

PUBLISHED ON JUL 18, 2021 09:24 AM IST

Former world chess champion Viswanathan Anand was held to a draw by a fighting Vladimir Kramnik in the third game of their four-game No-Castling match for the Sparkassen Chess Trophy here. The Indian maestro led 2-1 after the 61-move draw and has the advantage going into the final game.

In an English Defence game, Anand, playing white, got into an advantageous position and piled on the pressure on the Russian in game three late on Saturday. Kramnik, however, held firm to earn a hard-fought draw. The duo will meet later on Sunday in the fourth and final game. Anand only needs a draw to triumph.

The second game between the two former World champions had ended in a draw on Wednesday. The Indian had won the opening game on Tuesday to jump into the lead.

The match is played as part of the "No-Castling" Chess devised by the Russian GM. Castling is not allowed in this format in an effort to make the game more interesting.

Castling is a special move to protect the king and activate the rook. It's the only time in chess a player can move two pieces in one move. Anand had returned to over the board action in the Croatia Grand Chess Tour tournament in Zagreb last week and finished second overall (Rapid and Blitz combined).

Get our daily newsletter

Thank you for subscribing to our daily newsletter.

See original here:
No-Castling Chess: Anand held to draw by Kramnik, all to play for in decider - Hindustan Times

The Dark Side of Chess and Vaccine Skepticism on Fox News: The Week in Narrated Articles – The New York Times

This weekend, listen to a collection of narrated articles from around The New York Times, read aloud by the reporters who wrote them.

For the three decades after the title was formally introduced in 1950, the chess grandmaster was a rare species. But when the chess governing body started expanding into more countries in the 1980s, the label became more accessible and less exclusive nearly 2,000 players have become grandmasters since 1950.

Gradually, the label ceased being a ticket to a great future in chess. Young players and their often obsessive parents needed something to set them apart. The title of the youngest grandmaster turned into one such springboard.

For some players, securing a prestigious title meant more than just playing well. It is an open secret in chess that many players cut side deals with tournament organizers and other top competitors that help them achieve norms they might have struggled to get legitimately.

In December, the media mogul Rupert Murdoch received a dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. Afterward, he urged everyone else to get it, too. Since then, however, a different message has been a repeated refrain on the prime-time shows on Mr. Murdochs Fox News Channel.

The hosts Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham and guests on their respective shows have said on the air that the vaccines could be dangerous; that people are justified in refusing them; and that public authorities have overstepped in their attempts to deliver them.

The comments may have helped cement vaccine skepticism in the conservative mainstream, even as the Biden administrations campaign to inoculate the public is running into resistance in many parts of the country.

Written and narrated by Emma G. Fitzsimmons

New York is one of a handful of major cities where voters have yet to elect a woman as mayor, along with Los Angeles, Detroit and Philadelphia.

In the recent New York mayoral elections, under the new ranked-choice voting system, two candidates, Kathryn Garcia and Maya Wiley, won more than 380,000 first-choice votes between them, or nearly 41 percent of the votes. Ms. Garcia finished just one percentage point behind Eric Adams, who finished first.

But their loss felt like a missed opportunity for those who believed that New York would at long last elect a woman.

Im disappointed and sad, said Christine Quinn, the former City Council speaker who ran for mayor in 2013. I give a lot of credit to Eric Adams, but I want a woman to be mayor of New York. It is truly, truly disheartening.

Written and narrated by Alex Coffey

At about 5:30 p.m. on the last day of June, two old friends met in front of the media gate on the west side of the Oakland Coliseum. It was the first time theyd seen each other in over a year, but they had endured longer stretches.

Their lives were never on parallel tracks. One was a generational ballplayer. The other a part-time baseball scout who spent his days patrolling the streets of Berkeley, Calif., as a police officer.

On his draft day back in 1976, Rickey Henderson, who was 17 at the time, sensed he would stay connected to J.J. Guinn.

That moment wasnt about the game, Henderson said. I was a single-parent kid. I didnt have that father figure. J.J. was interested in you, in what you were doing, in teaching you. He looked after us.

Written and narrated by Jer Longman

For seven months, Emmanuel Durn, 19, and Fred Gracia, 57, have been trying to escape the brutal, viral reason most people have heard their names.

Their violent encounter came during a high school football game in December. Durn was ejected after being flagged for three penalties on the same play. He went to the sideline, then rushed back onto the field, slamming into Gracia, the referee. Four college scouts were reportedly in the stands that night.

The event and its aftermath raised important questions: When a young athlete commits an egregious act, where should punishment intersect with compassion? Does the athlete deserve a second chance? And how does a teenager begin again after facing nationwide disgust and cancellation?

The Timess narrated articles are made by Parin Behrooz, Claudine Ebeid, Carson Leigh Brown, Anna Diamond, Aaron Esposito, Elena Hecht, Elisheba Ittoop, Emma Kehlbeck, Marion Lozano, Anna Martin, Tracy Mumford, Tanya Perez, Margaret Willison, Kate Winslett and John Woo. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Ryan Wegner, Julia Simon and Desiree Ibekwe.

Read more from the original source:
The Dark Side of Chess and Vaccine Skepticism on Fox News: The Week in Narrated Articles - The New York Times