Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

Tom Brady, Byron Leftwich winning the chess match with Steve Spagnuolo – Touchdown Wire

Midway through the third quarter of Super Bowl LV, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are winning on the scoreboard, holding a 28-9 lead over the Kansas City Chiefs.

They are also winning on a different board. The chessboard. At this point in the game Tom Brady and Byron Leftwich are winning the chess match with Steve Spagnuolo, the defensive coordinator of the Kansas City Chiefs.

The Buccaneers opening drive of the second half, which culminated in a touchdown run from Leonard Fournette, provides two prime examples. First is this third-down conversion with Brady hitting Fournette with a simple checkdown:

Before the snap of the ball, Spagnuolo has his defense in a pressure alignment. Brady checks the protection at the line of scrimmage, bringing Rob Gronkowski in to a wing alignment on the right side of the formation. Rather than send Gronkowski who has already caught a pair of touchdown passes in this game into a route Brady asks him to block.

However, Spagnuolo does not bring pressure. Instead he drops seven into coverage, hoping that Brady now does not have a downfield option with Gronkowski now kept in to block. But Brady calls his bluff, taking the simple checkdown to Fournette for the first down.

Then a few plays later with the ground game going, Byron Leftwich and Brady turn to the play-action game. Watch the action of the offensive line up front as they sell the run, pulling a blocker in front of this play. This freezes the defense, allowing Gronkowski to get vertical for an easy read and throw:

Then the touchdown run from Fournette, which is in some respect a mirror image of the above play-action throw to Gronkowski. Only this time a blocker pulls from the left to the right side, getting in front of Fournette for the touchdown:

Right now Spagnuolo and the Chiefs defense are guessing, and the Buccaneers are winning. Both on the chessboard, and on the scoreboard.

View original post here:
Tom Brady, Byron Leftwich winning the chess match with Steve Spagnuolo - Touchdown Wire

EDITORIAL: If elections are a game of chess, then pieces are being put in place – Bahamas Tribune

WE are well and truly gearing up for election season now with every day seemingly bringing another piece being moved around the electoral chess board.

Halson Moultrie set the ball rolling on Thursday with his resignation from the FNM, and now we hear that Peter Turnquest has gone from Deputy Prime Minister to not having a nomination at all for the next election. Thats quite a reversal of fortune for his political career.

Three more incumbent FNM MPs are also reported to be likely to be denied a nomination and on top of that two other names are up in the air. One of those is Frederick McAlpine, and that is no surprise after his frequent battles with his own party. The other is Dr Duane Sands, another who has seen a swift change since being Minister of Health. He has been critical too of the administration, though it was notable that he was out and about in FNM colours in his constituency at the weekend.

Meanwhile, Branville McCartney, who said he has been courted by both parties as a candidate, says hell be sitting this election out. The former DNA leader isnt as outspoken these days as he was in a green shirt. What that means for his political future is very much up in the air.

From here on, you can expect the political atmosphere to keep heating up. Candidates will no doubt be getting their deliveries of red, yellow or green shirts, and hitting the streets in constituencies as much as COVID-19 restrictions allow.

It will likely be a very different election season with the traditional rallies very much in doubt given the pandemic.

It will also very likely have the state of the economy at its heart. Whichever party wins is going to have to rebuild an economy already hard hit by Hurricane Dorian even before the pandemic wiped out tourism. FNM or PLP, either government would have had their plans thrown into disarray by those two hammer blows and many will vote based on the lack of money in their pocket. The question must be, though, which government will be best equipped to deal with the next hammer blow.

Hurricanes remain a constant threat, and this pandemic is far from over yet.

Who will be the steadiest hand for the future, and who will be the candidates in each constituency best equipped to help get us to that future? For many constituencies, we still must wait and see but not for long.

The games afoot.

Peter Nygards legal strategy in The Bahamas has caught up with him but in Canada.

Denying Mr Nygard bail over the nine counts of sex trafficking and racketeering that he faces, Judge Shawn Greenberg pointed out Nygards failure to appear in court in The Bahamas for contempt proceedings.

He said: Two warrants for his arrest have been issued by the Bahamian court According to the recently released decision of the Court of Appeal for the Commonwealth of The Bahamas, Mr Nygard breached orders to attend court on five occasions.

He also showed up Mr Nygards excuse for not showing up to a Bahamian court, pointing out that the health issues cited by Mr Nygard didnt stop him from travelling by air to Los Angeles in the winter of 2020 and therefore it is difficult to accept it as an excuse for not travelling to The Bahamas.

Well done, Judge Greenberg. Sometimes, court processes and decisions can be baffling but this is as plain and straightforward as they come. Mr Nygard showed no respect for the court in The Bahamas, so he cant expect any leeway from a court elsewhere.

Bring on the court case so Mr Nygards case can be heard in full but in the meantime, there can be no surprise that he has to sit behind bars until that day comes.

Go here to read the rest:
EDITORIAL: If elections are a game of chess, then pieces are being put in place - Bahamas Tribune

Enjoyed the Queen’s Gambit? Now you can make 250/hour as a VIP chess and maths tutor in Knightsbridge – Journalism.co.uk

Press Release

One lucky chess wizard could be in for the part-time job of a lifetime. The right candidate, described as "a high flyer in his/her own right" has the chance to earn an eye-watering 1,000 GBP/week for four hours of work!

After Netflix reported 62 million viewers watched The Queen's Gambit during its first month, it seems that interest in chess has penetrated even the uppermost echelons of society. A London-based family is now offering a top salary for a tutor to turn their son into a chess protege.

The job post, listed on VIP tutor, governor and nanny job site Jobs in Childcare, states that the tutor should help the youngster "to excel in maths at school and nurture his natural interest in mathematics, physics and chess out of school". The tutor should be a 'high flyer', perhaps working in Londons financial district or similar.

The lucky successful applicant will be well rewarded for his or her time; the salary on offer is 250 per hour, totalling 1,000 per week for the four hours of work requested.

James Alger, Director of Jobs in Childcare commented that chess-related job posts have become more common on the site. We have certainly noted a number of clients seeking candidates who can play chess. Its making a comeback!

To find out more, you can view the original job post here:

About the company:

Jobs in Childcare offers jobs to enable nannies, governesses, early years specialists, child carers, and even teachers and tutors to search for a wide range of vacancies suitable for them across the globe.

Go here to read the rest:
Enjoyed the Queen's Gambit? Now you can make 250/hour as a VIP chess and maths tutor in Knightsbridge - Journalism.co.uk

My Son Was A Highly Competitive Chess Player. Then COVID-19 Happened. – HuffPost

My sons love for chess began when we signed him up for a chess class at age 4. Three years later, he would compete against older contestants both in local tournaments and in the U.S. National Open many of these hed won. At around the same time, he became the second-ranked player in Pennsylvania for his age group.

I was an amateur chess player myself, but with no ferocious desire to win. Still, I was ecstatic when he started bringing home prize money and trophies. He was featured in local newspapers. He played against grandmasters, includingRenato Naranja, who drew against chess greats such as Bobby Fisher and Samuel Reshevsky. After Naranja played my son, Ivry, at the famous Marshalls Chess Club in New York City in 2012, Karasha said, Well, now we know the true meaning of chutzpah.

Now, at 16, he can be seen playing with two hands perched on his cheeks a signature pose hed adapt from those earlier years. At home, in front of Zoom with his weekly chess tutor, a grandmaster at age 17, my son is practically unrecognizable in his hoodie as he reworks his attacks and captures from previous games.

Before COVID-19 hit, my son had achieved a U.S. Chess Federation rating of 1700, a coveted goal that took him nearly two years. But in light of the pandemic, the last two rounds of our local 2019-2020 USCF-rated tournaments were put on hiatus.

I encouraged him to sign up for the online tournaments offered through the federation, but he refused.

Mom, with eight hours of online school, why bother? he retorted. Playing these online tournaments is like playing Chess.com. Its so stupid. Its so dumb.

In comparison to the losses of peoples own health, lives and death of family members both in our own town and globally, my sons loss was a very minor one. Obviously, we could survive without chess tournaments. The lack of momentum felt like a loss, nevertheless.

For 11 years, he had been playing in-person chess games nonstop, and each time he went over those lost games with his tutor, he could strengthen his understanding of those openings, middle and endgames. But now the loss of the in-person playing experience made him feel as if he had been robbed of something.

Then, just as we entered the eighth month of the pandemic, a solution emerged unexpectedly.

When watching the popular Netflix series The Queens Gambit, I saw my redheaded son in Beth Harmon, the fictional character played by Anya Taylor-Joy. Here was a protagonist of will and wit breaking social norms, creating her own destiny. Her moves were extraordinary, and I wanted my son to at least witness her in action.

Ivry, theres something I want you to watch, I said, and surprisingly he stopped what he was doing so we could watch together.

In one scene, Beth Harmon trains with Benny in New York City, her mentor in preparation for her big tournament in Paris and in Russia both against the world champion Borgov.

Why not advance the knight? Why isnt he defending against the rook? Benny asks. Whats going to become of the backward pawn?

For months, Ivrys chess tutor had been pointing out my sons oversight of not using his knight to defend the rook.

In chess, there is a situation known as stalemate for which there is no legal move. Even though Beth was a fictitious character and I was just my sons mother, I didnt want him to feel stuck in a stalemate. The pandemic has been teaching us that without flexibility and adaptability, its impossible to think with clear moves and plans for defense and attacks.

So what do you think? Do you agree with Benny? Wheres the defense against the rook?

Hmmm, he said. Interesting.

Photo Courtesy Of Dorit SassonIvry at age 9, sets up a chessboard at the local library in preparation for his chess tutor.

Problem-solving has become key to navigating a pandemic, our uncertain world. Similarly, I am a chess player understudy: How can I parent and work from home successfully? How can I stay focused with ongoing distractions when were fighting this global war? When we problem-solve together, we become golden.

Up until now, my son was responsible for his own problem-solving. Unlike baseball and basketball, you cant exactly cheerlead a chess player. But you can advocate for them.

So together we came up with a plan:

1. Play for the love of the game. Not to advance a USCF rating. Come back and analyze. This will take the pressure off.

2.Then when youre ready, sign up for just one one-day tournament. We picked one that fell during the winter break that didnt compete with my sons online schooling, the Manhattan Chess Open on Dec. 30. He won three games, lost one and drew one. And he won a cash prize for a score that put him in fifth place in his rated group.

Even though chess is played silently, at least I have the pride of helping my son as we find ways to adjust and overcome in an uncertain situation. He realized he could do just as well and maybe even better. I learned to trust in his adaptability and flexibility, that he would find his way even if playing online wasnt his thing.

At the end of the day, however, there is really no other choice in a pandemic but to adapt and go with the flow. I want to believe that the day will come when he will go back to playing in-person tournaments, and when that happens, we will not take them for granted.

Do you have a compelling personal story youd like to see published on HuffPost?Find out what were looking forhereandsend us a pitch!

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

View original post here:
My Son Was A Highly Competitive Chess Player. Then COVID-19 Happened. - HuffPost

Just the Rules: The Same Thing, Only Different – uschess.org

Did you ever notice that things tend to come around again in different disguises? The same old, same old all dressed up in different clothes. So-called unfair advantages in chess wear many costumes but, in the end, it is still a protest about those alleged advantages. Check this out:

Two-Dimensional Boards in a Three-Dimensional World

Those digital notation devices were game changers for OTB chess. No more illegible scribbles on paper scoresheets. Games could be broadcast live on the internet. Tournament game bulletins went from tediously entering moves to point-and-click data transfers. But like anything new, those devices came with some baggage.

Many pragmatic wood pushers soon discovered a valuable and unintended notation device assetthey could preview the intended move on their two-dimensional gizmo, before they actually had to make their move on the three-dimensional game board. The outcry from the troops did not go unnoticed. The rule giversthe delegatesdictated that moves had to be made on the game board before they were entered into those note-taking gadgets. While the outcries died down somewhat, a new protest arose.

The new argument claimed unfairness that device-users could analyze their exact three-dimensional positions on a two-dimensional screen. But the counter-argument to this pointed to the widespread use of top game demonstration boards that already allowed players to evaluate their own current games in 2D. Some devices featured the ability to project games onto large screens, which have become the replacement for those old-style demo boards. This improvement allowed the top contests in each section to be viewed by everyoneeven the two players.

There was no evidence that players analyzing their own games, be it on demo boards or two-dimensional screen projections, provided any advantage whatsoever. The law-givers passed no regulation governing this activity: Wood pushers analyzing their games on a two-dimensional replica of their current three-dimension contests were not banned. (An individual organizer might ban this activity, though, so checking that events special tournament rules was always a good idea).

Three-Dimensional Boards in a Two-Dimensional World

The pandemic replaced OTB chess with digital chess. Online platforms replaced onsite tournament halls. Three-dimensional chess boards were replaced by two-dimensional replicas. The rulebook updated Internet Chapter 10 with new regulations. Now the question from some contestants is: Can I use my 3D set and board next to my 2D online board?

Ironically, these days I hear rumblings about the physical board next to its digital cousin as an alleged unfair advantage -- but the 2D equipment is the standard. Its the same old, same old alleged unfairness in a change of clothes: the same thing, only different!

There is no specific language that allows or disallows a 3D sideboard. The closest the US Chess rulebook comes to addressing this 3D question is in chapter 10, rule 6A, which points out that organizers in this new online era can create online event specific rulesjust like they are able to do for OTB tournaments. FIDE recently published their own set of online rules that addresses the extra 3D board subject.

If having that extra third dimension set-up for US Chess events concerns you (one way or the other), check with the organizer before you sign up for their online tournaments. And, of course, be prepared to move your troops first on the 2D board before they do any marching on your 3D boardthe camera will know!

Tim Just is a National Tournament Director, FIDE National Arbiter, and editor of the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the US Chess Rulebook. He is also the author of My Opponent is Eating a DoughnutandJust Law, which are both available from US Chess Sales and Amazon/Kindle. Additionally, Tim recently revised The Guide to Scholastic Chess, a guide created to help teachers and scholastic organizers who wish to begin, improve, or strengthen their school chess program. Tim is also a member of the US Chess Rules Committee. His new column, exclusive to US Chess, Just the Rules will help clarify potentially confusing regulations.

The free, updated US Chess Rules (Chapters 1+2 + 10 +11 from the 7th edition rulebook) are now downloadable and available online. Past Just the Rulescolumns can be viewed here. Plus listen to Tim when he was a guest on the US Chess podcast One Move at a Time.

Original post:
Just the Rules: The Same Thing, Only Different - uschess.org