Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

The "Offensive" Chess Opening – Chess.com

In his recent stream, Russian GM Alexey Dreev called a certain opening "indecent." Moreover, he said that it is disrespectful towards your opponent to play this opening. He also said that if you don't understand why it is disrespectful behavior then it would be very difficult for him to explain why it is. I know you are wondering by now what opening he is talking about. It is the good old 2.Qh5 opening.

If you understand Russian, here is the relevant fragment of the stream.

Alexey Dreev is a very strong grandmaster who got a classical training under the world's most famous coach, Mark Dvoretsky. Some 10 years ago I would endorse every single word he said. But hey, it is 2020 now and nothing is normal here. Super-grandmasters play K +R vs. K+R endgames, and our world champion played the following "game."

Of course, there is reason in Magnus Carlsen's madness, and I see it as a very noble if somewhat bizarre behavior. You can read the full story here.

But let's get back to the 2.Qh5 opening. In my opinion, this position is not any weirder than Fischer Random chess, where you can even castle on the very first move. In fact, I would prefer the 2.Qh5 opening to Fischer Random chess anytime! So, can I offend anyone by offering to play Fischer Random chess?

GM Dreev mentioned the game that Magnus Carlsen lost after playing 2.Qh5, but to be fair, the result of the game had nothing to do with the opening. In fact, at some point the world champion missed a winning tactical shot.

Let me start with a disclaimer: I am not recommending you play 2.Qh5 since there are many openings in chess that promise White an opening advantage, and 2.Qh5 is not one of them. But as a tricky weapon of internet chess for players rated below 1600, it can be quite dangerous. Let's examine the main appeal (or should I say tricks) of 2.Qh5.

After you play 2.Qh5, your opponent might intend to play 2...Qe7, but the opponent may mouseslip and play 2...Ke7 instead.

Can you possibly checkmate your opponent in three moves in a Ruy Lopez?

Black can simply forget that the e5-pawn is under attack. Here is a typical example. (Just as I do in all my articles, I have withdrawn the names of the amateur players.)

Yes, it is the good old "Scholars Mate."

Black plays g7-g6 in order to defend against the Scholar's Mate but then develops the bishop in the traditional way to c5. The subsequent pin costs Black a knight.

Black plays g7-g6 and then correctly fianchettoes the bishop to g7. White's Qf3 really tempts Black to play Bg4 and attack the queen. On g4, the bishop becomes very vulnerable. Here is a good example of the possible mutual mistakes:

These are the most common tricks in the 2.Qh5 opening.

Today's question for our readers is: Do you play 2.Qh5 opening? If so, please share your best wins in the comments!

More here:
The "Offensive" Chess Opening - Chess.com

Online chess has surged during quarantine on platforms like Twitch and Youtube – Insider – INSIDER

Streaming services, games, and screens of all types have gotten more action during quarantine, but according to data from Social Blade and several analytics firms, chess content on YouTube and Twitch has performed particularly well.

Chess videos have been watched more than 350 million times worldwide on YouTube since January, according to data provided to Insider by the platform, which they said showed a significant trend.

Chess channels have experienced great growth during quarantine on YouTube.

Kingscrusher, run by British chess obsessive Tryfon Gavriel, has seen gains of over 10,000 views per day.

Gavriel runs the chess website ChessWorld.net and stepped into the realm of online video after encouragement from one of the site's members, who asked him to record videos on popular chess matches. He set up his channel in 2007.

He graduated from analyzing and recounting popular matches throughout history to live commentating games as he played them. Now Gavriel has 9,000 videos and 110,000 followers on his YouTube channel and said that interest has spiked during quarantine.

Gavriel also said he has more people accessing his correspondence server, where he plays chess online. Players use the online platform to make moves in games across the world. "I'm playing a lot more people," he said. "I've got over 3,000 current games now."

It's not just Gavriel seeing a boom from chess's popularity at present. Hungarian grandmaster Anna Rudolf breaks out from the standard chess game analysis to more inventive videos for her 43,000 subscribers, including playing choker, a combination of chess and poker.

According to data from SullyGnome, an analytics partner of livestreaming services provider StreamElements, chess is booming on Twitch as well.

Chess is now one of the top 20 games streamed on Twitch, with the number of hours watched increasing from around three million in March 2020 to more than eight million in May.

Chess has always been a part of Twitch which partnered with Chess.com in 2017 but the platform has seen significant viewership increases since the coronavirus hit.

"Nothing compares with the rise it experienced in recent months when some of the top streamers, such as xQc, Reckful, and LIRIK, streamed it," said Doron Nir, CEO of StreamElements. "While the chess community has achieved a lot of success on its own, this latest move illustrates the power of influencers to broaden the appeal of a brand."

Coleen Cusack, a US Chess Federation-rated player who competed in the 1990s, has been a devoted chess watcher on Twitch since starting to watch after self-isolating due to COVID-19 in mid-March. "Twitch is a platform that has made chess appealing and accessible to persons who might be fans but who don't know where to go and watch and cheer," she said.

That's something Jennifer Shahade, a chess professional who streams on Twitch, can identify with. "Chess works well on Twitch because there's no hidden information, so you can play it in real-time or with a very short delay," she said.

The streams also give viewers the opportunity to learn in a way that they wouldn't elsewhere. "Chess at a high level is played on instinct as much as intense calculations, so it's possible for titled players and champions to educate and entertain while the level of player doesn't degrade as much as one may expect," she said.

Narrating decisions made over the course of several minutes, rather than a quick-reaction button press as is commonplace in video game streaming, is possible in a way that it isn't for gamers. That helps foster a sense of community.

It's also glammed up the game and made it more accessible. Taking elements of the frenetic presentation of video game streamers that are commonplace on Twitch has made chess seem less boring. "It packs a certain level of energy that watching a long, slow chess game between two grandmasters doesn't offer," Cusack said.

Cusack believes the pandemic has benefitted chess because "everyone has more time." Professionals like Shahade and Alexandra Boatez, who also stream on Twitch, hosted a tournament for women that gave ordinary people the chance to play against grandmasters. Cusack took part.

"While competing, I didn't have time to worry about the pandemic," she said. "It's been a huge escape and release for me."

That's also why Kevin Allocca, head of culture and trends at YouTube, believes the game has done so well on the world's biggest video sharing platform. "Chess works surprisingly well on YouTube because both creator and viewer can be active participants as events unfold, learning, discussing, and, in some cases, playing along simultaneously," he explains.

"And the variety or skill levels catered to means the experience can be somewhat personalized to the viewer's proficiency. That this serves as something of an antidote to the isolation of lockdown has attracted new fans to this already vibrant community."

That's what Shahade also thinks is behind the amazing surge in chess watching online. "Chess is a great game for our moment, as it's a way to keep our minds occupied and challenged during these very strange and often devastating times," she said. "Chess allows us to connect through so many ages and cultures. No one should be left out and it's wonderful to see so many new aficionados, as they can learn so much about art and history through the ancient game."

Link:
Online chess has surged during quarantine on platforms like Twitch and Youtube - Insider - INSIDER

Course teaches students how to master chess so they can master their minds > News > USC Dornsife – USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and…

A seasoned chess pro teaches USC Dornsife students critical thinking, decision-making strategy and history lessons through a 1,500-year-old board game. [5 min read]

Stroll around the USC campus on a clear day when were not in the midst of a pandemic and you might run into Jack Peters, lecturer in Slavic languages and literature, playing a dozen chess matches simultaneously beneath the Tommy Trojan statue.

Once a term, Peters sets up an array of checkered boards and invites passing students to a game. Moving swiftly between opponents, taking only seconds for each move, he often completes 50 games in a couple of hours.

Youd imagine Peters brain to be on the verge of shorting out by the end of it all, but he admits the challenge is mostly physical. I move really quickly, and its usually hot, so I get pretty tired walking around for hours, he says.

Thats because chess allegro is all in a days work for Peters. Hes been an International Master since 1979, a lifetime title of distinction awarded to world-class players, and has squared up against greats like Mikhail Tal, the eighth person to hold the title of World Chess Champion.

Peters was chess columnist for the Los Angeles Times and has published multiple books on the game. Hes taught the class Chess and Critical Thinking at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences since 2002, guiding hundreds of students into the game that he has played since he was 8 years old.

A mind game

To Peters, theres much to learn from chess besides how to best your opponent. Mastering chess is a means to master critical, tactical thinking, which can be applied almost universally to lifes big challenges.

Students have to first recognize the situation they are in and then set priorities: What are the important features here? says Peters. Constant adaptation is also key. One of the hardest parts about chess is that you might have a great idea, but your opponent might also have their own idea, and then the plans change.

Such skills are also attractive to employers the ability to plan, solve problems and analyze information are frequently cited as some of the top desirable traits in recruits.

Its not just for sharpening the mind, however. Peters class touches on a little of everything, from art to science to business. A particular focus is the way chess became intertwined with both Russian cultural identity and Soviet strategy abroad.

After the games invention in India around 530 A.D., traders spread chess into Russia where it became a popular pastime for noble and commoner alike. Ivan the Terrible, ruler of Moscow from 1533 to 1547, was an avid player and earned his name in part for killing an opponent with a chessboard during a game.

After the Russian Revolution in the early 20th century, Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin hoped to empower a demoralized populace by producing a great generation of chess players. The USSR established the Soviet Chess Federation to train children starting at the age of 5 to become formidable players.

Lenins successor, Joseph Stalin, continued Lenins efforts, placing Nikolai Krylenko, public face of the ruthless Soviet justice system, at the head of the organization. Krylenko saw chess as a propaganda opportunity, explains Peters. Skilled players could demonstrate Russian intellectual might on the world stage.

Jack Peters has been an International Master of chess since 1979 and has written several books on the game.

Chess became so synonymous with USSR prowess that a 1972 match between world champion Boris Spassky and upstart American Bobby Fischer turned into a heated, symbolic showdown between world powers poised at the knifes edge of battle.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990, chess reverted to something of a Russian export. Over the next 10 years, many of the grandmasters raised in theSovietUnion actually became citizens in other countries and started playing for those national teams.One of the jokes at the chess Olympics was our Russians can beat your Russians, as every team would have one or two Russians who emigrated, recalls Peters.

Despite this history, chess is actually an immensely diplomatic game, Peters reminds us. As long as both players know the rules, no common language is needed to play chess.

Game, set, match

These days, Peters isnt playing chess in person much due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When the pandemic moved classes online, Peters switched to software, and he plays against students virtually. The transition went pretty smoothly, but he had to adjust his methods for the final exam.

Normally Id set up 20 or so boards in the classroom and play all the students at once. Now, Im limited by the software to only playing eight at a time, says Peters, sounding a bit wistful for bygone days of a chess bonanza played at lighting speed.

He doesnt often get bested. Maybe once a year or so I have someone that beats me, he says.

Losing to the professor isnt a problem in Peters class, however. Their final isnt about winning. They write about the game we played, describe their strategy and any mistakes they made. Theyre graded on how well they understand what happened and the principles of the game.

To Peters, the lesson he wants students to learn isnt one of victory but how critical thinking, careful strategy and learning from ones mistakes can better you for the next challenge.

Keep calm and play on

Despite the mental rigor chess demands, Peters class is a popular one. Vespera Luo, who is majoring in chemistry at USC Dornsife and journalism at USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, enrolled after seeing recommendations for the class on the USC Reddit forum, and members of USCs chess team sometimes pop by for a game or to recruit new players.

Its enduring popularity likely has to do with Peters calm, expert approach. Mr. Peters is so patient with a beginner, he doesntfeed you answers but leads you to the right path of thinking, says Luo.

Its also a rare opportunity for chess enthusiasts to try their hand against an expert. I really enjoyed playing against Jack and seeing in person how good someone can be at chess, says Tristan Tausch, a business administration major at USC Marshall School of Business.

For Luo, lessons from the class extend to the meditative as well, referencing a memorable anecdote from Peters. While working for the L.A. Times, Peters found himself hastily writing an article on the infamous match between Russian chess master Gerry Kasparov and IBMs computer Deep Blue. (Kasparov was defeated, marking a shift in humankinds perceived mental power over machine.)

Mr. Peters said it was the first time his editor rushed him to write something because there are no emergencies in the chess world. I remember him saying this sentence, and it just struck me somehow, says Luo. Were living in such a fast-paced world today, and at that moment I realized I prefer some quietness and slowness in my life.

More:
Course teaches students how to master chess so they can master their minds > News > USC Dornsife - USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and...

If regular chess isn’t hard enough for you, try 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel – PC Gamer

Chess is a game so complex that even with all our computing power it remains unsolved, which means that the perfect strategy has yet to be determined. And that's just boring old regular chess. It gets considerably more complicated when you and your opponent can use time travel to send your chess pieces into the past and create different parallel universes. Now thinking ahead isn't enoughyou have to start thinking a few dozen moves behind and a whole bunch of moves sideways.

I've played one game of 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel, but that means I've really played several games of 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel, because of the new timelines that spring up when you send chess pieces into the past and thus create new timelines in a parallel universe, you're constantly playing a number of slightly different games of chess at once.

Unsurprisingly, I lost, and I eventually could see why: I was checkmated by my opponent, not in any of the present realities but in one version of the past, which then became the new present, when they sent a bishop back to trap one of my kings. (I had two kings on that particular chessboard in that particular universe, having sent one back from the future and into the other king's reality in what I thought might be a clever move at the time. It was not.)

How does it all work? I'm afraid the current version of me hasn't figured it all out yet, but the brief trailer below will give you a small taste.

Did that help? That may not have helped. Here, try reading this Steam review from TheSpookiestUser:

"I was playing a game against a human opponent online, and at one point they sent a queen back in time from one of the ten timelines currently in play to put five of my past kings into check at once. I sent one of my own pieces even further back to stall, and they proceeded to send one of their queens back to the start of the game to try and beat me before I even got to that point. I was able to maneuver one of my bishops in the second-most divergent timeline into position to capture the queen in the alternate present once we got back to that point and save the game (I eventually won by checkmating their king 5 turns in the past)."

If you didn't find that helpful, either try waiting a few minutes to let it sink in, or better yet, travel a few minutes into the past to read it and maybe it'll be helpful to your alternate self when it catches back up to its version of now. There are also, blessedly, some guides to help you get started.

Original post:
If regular chess isn't hard enough for you, try 5D Chess With Multiverse Time Travel - PC Gamer

Actual 5D Chess proves that time travel should not be allowed – Rock Paper Shotgun

Theoretically, I like chess. I learned it at a very young age, and defeated the uncle who taught me, hollowing his soul and cursing myself to a decade with nobody to play it with. That decade probably kept me from being the kind of person who memorises moves and has special names for things from a textbook. In a way, it made me.

5D Chess, on the other hand, makes me feel like that uncle likely did. This is not possible. How. What. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

I have yet to experience a single defeat or victory that I understood. And I dont like it.

The basic idea of 5D Chess is that instead of moving your pieces around as normal, you can (sometimes) send them back in time, to add them to an earlier state that the board was in. It does this not in the Achron way, with its single timeline periodically reordering events and erasing units in an attempt to enforce linear causality.

Instead, whenever a unit goes back in time, a new timeline is formed. This means two boards are now in play, running parallel to each other, and you have to make a move on each of them. You can then move pieces through time again, opening a third timeline, or crossing between the current two.

You might think this makes for some immensely satisfying matches where you and your opponent get embroiled in escalating mindgames and interlinked plots and decoys, only for one of you to pull off a brilliant victory by suddenly moving the piece you sent back in time for no apparent reason 8 moves ago.

What actually happens is that you keep winning games but you have absolutely no idea why. You see this? Im playing as black here, and Ive just won. I didnt question it at first.

Cuh, pfft, OBVIOUSLY Sin this is Horgdens 9th Upper Galician maneouvre, you amateur. Did you even study chess?

But then no. No, this isnt checkmate. They can move their king. And its not hopeless either. If they move their king to the right, theyre fine. I cant even hurt them much on my next turn. Sure, theyre clearly on the defensive, and I fancy my chances, but its still open.

An old friend called our playstyle Erosion Chess. Devastating each others armies as much as possible is more fun than a rapid technical knockout.

A few games later I think I got why this one was checkmate. After suffering several defeats that were very similar, I learned that you lose the game if you cant make as many moves as there are active timelines. Quite often, if your king only has one escape route, its all over. This makes a charging queen even more absurdly powerful, and honestly? Its very anticlimactic. I keep being surprised by my own victories.

But it gets weirder than this. When you send a unit back in time, it doesnt move how youd expect. Say your bishop, which normally moves diagonally, moves to another board. It doesnt go directly to the same physical location, nor does it just transfer its diagonal moves to another board. Instead, each piece has its own new rules on how it moves when going back in time or jumping to another timeline.

Its a fun concept, but what it means in practice is now you have a tonne of new oblique rules to think about, and instead of a single board where you can see every possibility, you now need to scroll around and mentally cross-reference as many boards as there have been turns in the game so far, and potentially multiplied several times if you have several timelines going. And it means that games are often won because now a knight is actively threatening a load of extra squares on a board from six moves ago.

Ill be honest, I kind of hate it. The time travel is one thing, but combining it with the weird physical movement is such a ballache that I just end up playing regular chess instead, doing my best to ignore my opponents schemes. I am, ironically, like an old European king, idiotically playing pompous games while Napoleons armies cheat by being competent instead of posh. They didnt understand why they kept losing, and only won kind of by accident, too.

I stick to one timeline, and only travel in order to chase down and root out fleeing kings. I want a film about this now.

My brain is already an ever shifting Gordian knot of possibilities when Im not playing chess. I dont need this in my life. But what really gets me is this game:

Dont get me wrong, I was still a massive boffin in primary school. If Id got into chess Id be insufferable now.

Im playing as black, right. You might notice that the opponent has two kings dont worry about that too much. This is the second of two timelines, and their king from the original has fled here. If I capture either of the kings on this board I win. I have a few plans for doing that. I decide to move my pawn on the left to take the white horsey, giving room to bring my castle into play.

Its probably terrible being extreeeemely good at chess. After a certain point, winning every time must get embarassing.

Oh, thats checkmate. Ive won.

WHAT.

When I click on the exclamation mark, a line appears to explain that my horsey in the top right corner is able to take the king in the past? But neither of them has moved for several turns, so why can it do that now but what?

I hate it when people use castling defensively. Cowards. Send out your king. Outgrow your useless tyrant class. Join us.

For the sake of completeness, heres the other active board. I moved my bishop up a bit, threatening neither king.

I find an unusual trick more satisfying than winning, which probably explains a lot about my life.

WHAT? WHAT? HOW? HOW IN THE EVERLASTING CHRIST WAS THAT A WINNING I mean, uh ha ha! You see? Foolish challenger! You ignorant peasants should stick to ONE DEE chess, fnaw fnaw. I am very smart.

View post:
Actual 5D Chess proves that time travel should not be allowed - Rock Paper Shotgun