Archive for the ‘Chess’ Category

Viince wins the ESL Mobile Open Auto Chess playoffs for season five – Dot Esports

Image via ESL

The playoffs for Auto Chess at the ESL Mobile Open season five wrapped up yesterday with Vincent Viince Truong coming out on top. Twenty-four players played 12 matches across three days to decide the top eight who will be moving on to the finals.

Related: Wildcard Gaming win ESL Mobile Open PUBG Mobile playoffs

Here are the leaderboards of the playoffs:

There was a three-way tie between Zath Zath Zen, Betyow, and Dawgbun for the eighth and last available position to the finals. Ultimately, Zath came out on top due to better average placements in the playoffs.

Theres a lot of really good players that made it, second-placed Chokegod said on being asked about the top eight players in a post-match interview. I am really glad that Joseph and Betyow didnt make it. They are obviously really good people who I would have loved to meet in the finals. They are also extremely good players but I dont think the lobby is a lot weaker without them.

The 24 qualified players for the playoffs were divided into three groups of eight players each. All players played 12 matches in their own group to earn points. In the end, the points from all groups were tallied to decide the top eight players.

Here are the group-wise results of the playoffs:

The ESL Mobile Open season five features PUBG Mobile, Asphalt 9: Legends, Auto Chess, and Clash of Clans. Top teams and players will make their way through the qualifiers and the playoffs to compete in the finals. The season five finals will likely be an offline event if the coronavirus pandemic allows that to happen. Details about the finals still havent been revealed.

Read the original here:
Viince wins the ESL Mobile Open Auto Chess playoffs for season five - Dot Esports

Maharashtra Chess Association hosts grand five-day Blitz Grand Prix – The Bridge

While the country is battling with coronavirus and almost every other sport has taken a hit, online chess thrives despite the hurdles as LetsUp brings a unique five-day Blitz Grand Prix tournament that commenced on June 3 and hosted by the Maharashtra Chess Association.

The Blitz tournaments will take place every Wednesday with a total prize fund of INR 155000each having the total prize fund of INR 25000 and top five GP finishers will get a total of INR 30000. Each of the tournament which will be hosted every Wednesday from June 3 to July 1 will be sponsored by Nasik District and Novel, Ahmednagar District and Narendra Firodia Unicorp, Pune District and Amanora, Jalgaon District and Jain Irrigation and h2e, and lastly, the Sangali District and Chitale Bandhu.

Entry is free for GMs, IMs, WGMs and WIMs. Entry fee for others is 250 for each tournament and 1,000 for registering all five events of the GP. The event is open to players all over the world. Registration for each event will close on the previous day of event i.e. Tuesday at 8 p.m. IST.

A player would get GP Points for finishing in the top 10 of every event. At the end of five events, all the points will be added. However, only the score of the best four events will be considered for the Grand Prix Prize money. For eg. If a player finishes first, second, third, fourth, and fifth in the five events, then his/her score of only the first four events will be counted.

GM Vaibhav Suri

The five-day event will see popular names from India and abroad taking part, which includes Grandmasters R Praggnanandhaa, D Gukesh, P Iniyan, Andres Carlos Obregon, Bilel Bellahcene, among others.

Grand Prix points will be earned after participation in every tournament. The individual with the maximum points will be awarded the prize money. In case of a tie, the prize money will be shared. The entry fee can be paid at mcgrandprix.chessbase.in.

On June 3, GM Vugar Rasulov of Azerbaijan won LetsUp MCA GP Blitz 1. Vugar scored an unbeaten 8.5/10 to win the tournament. Four players Vaibhav Suri, Jose Eduardo Martinez Alcantara of Peru, Gukesh and Praggnanandhaa finished a half-point behind the champion at 8.0/10 and were placed second, third, fourth and fifth respectively.

On June 3, GM Vugar Rasulov of Azerbaijan won LetsUp MCA GP Blitz 1

The Azerbaijani GM currently leads the GP standings and he will receive 6500 for winning Blitz 1. Vaibhav will get 4000 and Martinez won 2500 cash respectively.

Total 132 players including 28 GMs, 26 IMs and 10 WIMs from India, Algeria, Argentina, Chile, Egypt, Indonesia, Peru, Russia, Serbia, USA, Uzbekistan took part in this 10 Round event.

See the original post here:
Maharashtra Chess Association hosts grand five-day Blitz Grand Prix - The Bridge

When the wait finally ended for Viswanathan Anand – The Indian Express

Written by Sandip G | New Delhi | Updated: May 31, 2020 7:58:45 am In Frame: Former world chess champion Viswanathan Anand (PTI/File Photo)

When the moment finally arrived, without gripping drama or clutching suspense, the inner joy refused to manifest outwardly. Viswanathan Anand had been plotting and dreaming of scaling the world chess summit for the best part of the 1990s, but when that hour to celebrate eventually arrived, he was at a loss of celebrations.

He took a deep pause, deeper breath and placed his palms on his face, staring at the board where a few pieces lay scattered. I felt relieved. It was one thing off my back, you know, wondering when and where that would happen, and suddenly here it is. That felt very, very good, he tells The Indian Express, two decades after the memorable afternoon in Tehran.

Then, with an interminable pause, he adds: It was a big step. The decisive step.

Suddenly, the echoes of the past thundered like shooting stones from a restless mountain. I had been so close to the peak so many times, but always tripped and fell short by a step or two. I had waited so long for this step. I felt like I had accomplished a mission, Anand says.

READ | Alireza Firouzja: Champ in the making

Not that the defeats in New York (1995) and Lausanne (1998) haunted him every waking hour, not that his great rival Anatoly Karpovs slights on his lack of killer instinct played in his mind on a loop, but there came a time when Anand himself had begun wondering whether losing finals was more than a quirk of fate. In New York, a ruthlessly masterful Garry Kasparov, the big K in chess, pounced on the slightest of Anands mistakes, clinching a dilly-dallying 18-game match spread over 30 days.

Lausanne hit Anand harder, for after achieving a decisive endgame advantage in the first game of the 25-minutes-per-player tiebreak encounter, the Indian grandmaster erred and lost. The acerbic Karpov wasnt to leave without his characteristic scorn. I dont think he has the killer instinct to be a world champion, he had then said.

READ | Stuck in Germany for over 3 months, Viswanathan Anand to finally return home

It hurt Anand, though after adding four more world titles to his cabinet, he could shrug it off as the narrow mindset of small people. It didnt surprise me, but it still hurt. I mean it irritates you at some level. Because you feel every chess player will know his answers are nonsense, but people slightly further away may not realise it. They may actually believe this story, remarks Anand about his adversarys penchant for verbal posturing.

Then, upon reaching Tehran, he had little time to brood on the past. Thanks to a bout of fever. After the qualifying rounds (in Delhi), we (wife Aruna and he) decided to go for a nice meal in the city, but the next day both of us woke up sick. High temperature and an upset stomach. We rushed to a doctor who gave some medicines and we somehow managed to reach Tehran. There was no other option but to be there. The first two days were awful. I mean, we were just taking medicines and sleeping and resting, he recounts.

In hindsight, though, it turned out to be a blessing, as he had no time to dwell on his past failings. Looking back, I would say it was even nice, because when you have something like that, which forces you to rest, you dont feel guilty about not working. So very little work got done. But the good thing was, by the time I came out of my fever just as the tournament was starting, I felt much better. So that was helpful. I think Aruna suffered a bit longer. But in the end, it all worked out well, he says.

Thus, on December 20, he was sitting in the rectangular room of the Mamna Convention Hall in central Tehran in the backdrop of the Al-Borz mountain ranges, hugging the city like an overbearing mother, opposite the relentlessly attacking Alexei Shirov. The latter, a Latvian based in Madrid and one of the most aggressive players in the game, had pride to salvage and a championship to win, as he was denied the opportunity to challenge Kasparov for the Classical World Championship, despite winning the Candidates match two years earlier.

READ | From Kasparov to Carlsen: Five of the greatest chess matches ever played

The match, in certain sections of the Western media, was billed the clash of the lightning kids, though as it rolled out, both adversaries embraced calculated aggression than quick-kill. With black, Anand managed to draw the first game before he won the next two with a combination of guts and superb calculations. Into the fourth game, the contest was more or less decided, with Shirov needing a miracle to claw back into contention.

For all practical purposes, it was a dead rubber, yet its for the fourth game that the final is best remembered. Anand employed a radical, mysterious strategy Steinitz Variation of the French Defence undertaking to defend difficult positions against one of the best attacking players of our time. He pulled it off spectacularly, yet he wonders why the move gathered so much attention, and why its still being discussed.

Actually, Id been playing that set up into French Defence may be months before I played it here. So, it couldnt have come as a surprise, but I liked the positions and felt that I could still challenge him there. Yeah, also, it must be admitted that I already had a two-point lead. So that gives you a cushion to experiment also. So even if you lose a game, you still have a one-point lead but in all the complications, it turned out very well, Anand puts the move in perspective.

The final score-line read 3.5-.5, a stroll by all accounts. But it wasnt as facile as it looked like. If you look at the score, thats what it says. But I remember that these things were never as easy as they seem. I mean, if you try to relive the experience, you will find that there was always a bit of worry, this problem, that problem. Youll obviously be anxious about your opening game, then the second day, and so on and so forth. A day before the match, you think the next day is the most important, then it goes on and on. There were a lot of problems we anticipated and worried about, but in the end, none of them happened and everything turned out smoothly, he elaborates.

READ | Enter the dragon, in black and white: China win Online Nations Cup

Maybe, the facile disposition of the final explains Anands muted celebrations. It ended without a bang. Not even with a whimper. But with a simple handshake. A deep pause and a deeper breathe. He had finally scaled chesss Mount Everest.

*********

Or had he? A long-running feud between Kasparov and the games governing body FIDE, and a lawsuit filed by Karpov against the same organisation, had left at least two other players with claims of the title. Three months ago, Vladimir Kramnik had beaten Kasparov to wrestle the breakaway classical world chess championship in London.

Karpov, who considered himself the world champion as he was still undefeated in the world championship, too had fallen out with the federation. In 1998, he was seeded into the final, in which he beat Anand. But then, rather than wait until 2000, the federation held its second championship tournament in 1999 at Las Vegas. Angered about having to defend his title sooner than he had anticipated and about not being seeded into the final, Karpov boycotted the event and sued FIDE for breach of contract before the Court of Arbitration of Sports in Lausanne.

So Karpov didnt compete. The backdrop triggered off a storied debate on legitimacy.

To Anand, the situation resembled the dysfunctional state of another sport with multiple champions. It had become more like boxing, he had said then. But Anand was not sucked into the tussle off the board. The quest for the world championship was burning in his mind. Nothing snuck into his head, but the gleaming summit.

*******

The new century dawned disappointingly for Anand. He won a single game at the Linares International and finished fourth among six participants. He decided to take a break, returned home, spent a lot of time with his family and flew back to Spain after a couple of months. The break did wonders, as he rekindled his touch and returned to winning ways, snaring five tournaments on the spin.

The year flew by, guaranteeing that Anand didnt spend too long meditating on the year-end world championship. He was not over-focussed on the event, as he had been in previous instances. It must have been about five or six months prior to the event that we were notified. We were actually coming back from Madrid when I got a message on the phone saying that the World Championship was scheduled for Delhi in December. In between, there was the World Cup in August, an event in China and a few others. So, it was then that we started focussing on the World Championship. So, the maximum preparation might have started in October-November, he remembers.

Then a few weeks before the tournament, Anand decided to check into a different hotel, not the team hotel so that theres no distraction. We wanted some private space to be able to focus. So even though it would have been convenient to stay at the same hotel where the tournament was happening, we decided to stay in a different hotel, even if I had to commute some 15 minutes. It was a crucial decision, as it gave me a lot of space. We were able to isolate ourselves nicely. And the work got done fine, he recalls.

Anand was at his clinical best, steamrollering over his opponents. He crushed Viktor Bologan, Smbat Lputian and Bartomiej Macieja to reach the quarterfinals. There, against Alexander Khalifman posed his first big hurdle. Anand had defeated him at Linares, but then came something that disturbed him.

The federation decided to throw a birthday party for Anand on December 11, the scheduled tiebreaker day. You feel so relaxed when after every match, you get a day off, and you dont have to play. But that one moment, literally all the things that I had feared, happened. So, the federation had made a big plan for my birthday, which is nice, but this is not what you want to think about before a match. They should have understood that I had to play a tiebreaker. It just really drives you nuts, he says.

It was the only match wherein Anand was stretched, the only one in which he was pushed into the tiebreaker. In a hopelessly stalemate-like situation of the English Opening, Khalifman offered a draw on the 17th move, and Anand obliged. So, the match spilled onto his 31st birthday. A four tie-break game no less.

Fortunes ebbed and flew and Anand had to pull himself out of some tricky junctures. Khalifman had the ascendancy through most part of the game, but Anand clung on, and in the third game, demolished Khalifman in 41 moves. The last game ended in a stalemate after 52 moves.

When I finally survived that match, I was so relieved. At that moment, I realised that it was my title to lose. But I was exhausted, he says.

He had his share of fortune too. Sometimes even in tournaments in which you are playing your best chess, you need some divine help. You need a little bit of luck. At times, you need something to happen in your favour. During these times, you feel only talent does not work though it is not something which happens often, he says.

The birthday cake now tasted extra sweet. Khalifman praised Anand. Hes a genius, he emanates light. Veselin Topalov, who was watching the match, was enraptured: Gosh, he should be called the snake of Madras, not the tiger.

Now, only the Brit Michael Adams remained between Anand and Tehran. Two years ago, in the world championship match, they were locked in an intense battle to meet Karpov in the championship decider. I expected a very tough patch followed by a tie-break, based on our experience two years ago. I won the second game and suddenly that made life much easier. I felt it just was meant to happen here, he says.

There was another surprise round the corner. Anand had worked with Spanish Grandmaster Pablo San Segundo Carrillo in Spain, and wanted him for the final. But he was admittedly superstitious about ringing in his help. Generally, Im superstitious about asking Pablo before I qualify. But if we waited till I qualified, he might not be able to get his visa and everything in time, he says.

So when his wife Aruna asked him whether he needed a second for the final, Anand was like it would be really nice to have Pablo, but I dont know if this is a good time to ask, whether we will be able to arrange everything in time. Then Aruna told him that she had already contacted him and asked him if he could get a visa and keep a ticket booking just in case. And he had agreed.

She told me that he will be joining in Tehran in two days. I was very happy, he says. And with the baggage unburdened, Anand was ready to rule the world. He was already a great player, but in Tehran his greatness was finally etched on the silverware.

The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Sports News, download Indian Express App.

The Indian Express (P) Ltd

See original here:
When the wait finally ended for Viswanathan Anand - The Indian Express

16-year-old chess player scores stunning upset over world champion – The Mercury News

  1. 16-year-old chess player scores stunning upset over world champion  The Mercury News
  2. The Quarantine Chess Tournament That Could Change the Game Forever  The Ringer
  3. Iranian teen shocks chess grandmaster Magnus Carlsen to win $14,000 prize  CNN International
  4. Meet the US Chess 2020 International Youth Event Official Representatives  uschess.org
  5. Chess: Magnus Carlsen shocked by 16-year-old in Banter Blitz Cup final  The Guardian
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Originally posted here:
16-year-old chess player scores stunning upset over world champion - The Mercury News

On Chess: ‘Chunking’ Is The Memory Trick You Don’t Know You’re Using – St. Louis Public Radio

The field of cognitive psychology is filled with tips, tricks and strategies to improve memory; however, you dont need to be a cognitive psychologist to be familiar with these strategies. Chess players have long since mastered one of cognitive psychologys most useful tricks: chunking.

The idea of chunking first appeared in an article published in the Psychological Review titled The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information."

Written by George Miller (1956), the paper discusses the concept that the human brain can maintain five to nine pieces of information at any given time. Take note that it says pieces. The term chunking refers to the process of forming multiple pieces of information into a single piece a chunk that is easier to encode in our limited memory. A common example is phone numbers.

Experience it yourself. Try to memorize this list:

Apple, pen, eye, pear, hand, orange, paper, marker, leg.

Recalling all nine items is by no means an impossible task. It might take some time, but eventually you could recall each item individually. However, what if we tried chunking? All we have to do is change the way we look at that list transforming it from individual pieces of information to larger groups, or chunks.

With the change of perspective, we quickly realize that the list consists of items from familiar categories: fruits, office supplies and body parts. Cognitive psychology suggests that if we can remember the items on the list as distinctive and cohesive groups, then the information will be learned quicker and easier.

Now, try to memorize these three lists:

You may have noticed it took much less time than before. The chess player does this when he or she looks at the board, regardless of whether they are consciously aware of the process. Better players utilize better, faster chunking skills.

Chess is a game of chunks. There are pawns, minor pieces and major pieces three categories covering 16 individual pieces. Even aside from the pieces, there are seemingly limitless positional chunks of data.

For example, instead of memorizing that there are three pawns each on their own square (b2, c3, d4), a chess player notes the chunk of data: There is a pawn chain starting on b2. Three pieces become one easily remembered block of information.

In the picture above, the officer has built a defensive structure (Kings Indian defense or Fianchettos Castle) around his King with his rook, bishop and three pawns (Kg1, Rf1, Bg2, and pawns on f2, g3, and h2). Instead of remembering each of the six pieces and their individual positions, he can recall the entire formation as one chunk of information.

There is one more component of the 1956 study: memory capacity. Both the study and chess are concerned with working memory or short-term memory the memory that usually spans seconds. How many individual pieces of information can a person hold in their memory and use?

While Miller suggests that five to nine pieces of information will max out our processing capacity, newer studies suggest it is even lower around three to five. Regardless of the precise number, a chess player can only work with a finite number of information pieces, chunked or otherwise. The better the player is at chunking that is, the more information they can tuck away into each chunk the larger the advantage.

It is easy to see the advantages of chunking. A chess player who can better consolidate information leaves more of his or her attention available for strategic endeavors.

Consider this last thought: one player formulates half the board into four chunks, while their opponent uses four chunks to capture the whole board. Next time you look at a board, consider how you are chunking, and perhaps you can push your capacity a little further.

Brent Allmon is a writer, chess instructor and lover of science. He is also a member of the St. Louis Chess Club, a partner of St. Louis Public Radio.

Send comments and questions about this story to feedback@stlpublicradio.org.

Go here to read the rest:
On Chess: 'Chunking' Is The Memory Trick You Don't Know You're Using - St. Louis Public Radio