Mediaboss Marketing

Id like to share a quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian dissident author who emigrated to the United States during the height of the Cold War. Solzhenitsyn wrote about Communism and the Soviet Union mostly, but it is amazing the parallels that one can see with contemporary American society, in terms of the cultural climate. Keep in mind, the United States has changed from Solzhenitsyns time, so much so that the following quote now illustrates the current condition of western society.

Our present system is unique in world history, because over and above its physical and economic constraints, it demands of us total surrender of our souls, continuous and active participation in the general, conscious lie. To this putrefaction of the soul, this spiritual enslavement, human beings who wish to be human cannot consent.

One of the complaints of the early communists operating in western Europe in the late 20s and 30s was that the workers would not join their revolt. This astounded many of the early communists who could not believe that the workers did not want to overthrow the capitalistic system and all the accumulated historical legacy of oppression that they believed all workers inherited.

Gyrgy Lukcs was one of the early founders of cultural marxist thought who concluded that the workers did not join their revolt because of their Christian souls. What he believed was necessary was a re-education of society, a gradual changing of values and subversion of symbols until they no longer stood against global communist revolution. He and many like-minded left wing intellectuals would go on to found the Frankfurt school and continue disseminating these ideas of cultural paradigm change through language, ideas, and a pervasive counter-culture.

How much the times have changed where the counter-culture has become the dominant and only culture, the ideas all increasingly radical and the very English language changed to accommodate a pernicious left wing agenda of political correctness.

Because of this oppressive regime of thought, we are left without words to even articulate our opposition without immediately being castigated by a society-wide knee-jerk reflex, a defense mechanism programmed to act against reactionaries and traditionalists of all stripes. What Solzhenitsyn brought up about the Soviet Union is already steadily creeping up on us here in the west. The economic model of Marxism has failed, but the cultural model is alive and well, we see it in feminism, equalism, historical revisionism, native guilt, and disintegration of tradition on the grounds of it not being progressive enough.

It seems that to be part of the elite is to take part in a great lie. One must be able to mouth off their platitudes and adopt a vigilant eye for potential bait designed by the mob samizdat to lure you into making a mistake. Even worse, taking a page out of the New Testament and Jesuss admonition of harboring any seditious thoughts at all to heart, progressives try to not only reform our behavior, but the very contents of our character as well.

Good becomes bad, bad becomes good. Death becomes life, perversion the norm, sophism a part of every lecture, and the right to dissent only accorded to a select few. Truly, Solzhenitsyn would be rolling over in his grave.

Read More: How Long Will It Take For Everything To Be A Trigger Warning?

Read more here:
Solzhenitsyns Warning About Communism Applies To Todays ...

Categorized under Business,Ideology | Difference between Socialism and Communism

Socialism vs Communism

Socialism is commonly regarded as an economic system that seeks to achieve equality among members of society. Communism, on the other hand, is both an economic system that seeks equality among members of society and a political ideology that advocates a classless and stateless society and rejects religion. It is regarded as a more extreme form of socialism.

Socialism and communism both adhere to the principle that the resources of the economy should be collectively owned by the public and controlled by a central organization. They differ, however, in the management and control of the economy. In socialism, the people themselves decide through communes or popularly elected councils on how the economy should work. This makes socialism a liberal system because majority of the people have a say on how the economy should be run. Communism, on the other hand, controls its economy through a single authoritarian party. It is thus characterized as conservative because the economy functions based on the decisions of a few.

The views of socialism and communism also differ in the distribution of wealth produced by the economy. Socialism supports the view that the goods and services produced should be dispensed based on the productivity of an individual. In contrast, communism believes that the wealth should be shared by the masses based on the needs of the individual.

There are two kinds of properties in socialism: (1) personal property that an individual can own and enjoy; and (2) industrial property that is dedicated for the use of producing societys goods. Individuals, for example, can keep their digital cameras but cannot retain a factory that produces digital cameras. While personal properties can be kept, socialists make sure, however, that no private property will be used as an instrument for oppression and exploitation. In comparison, communism treats all goods and services as public property to be used and enjoyed by the entire populace.

Finally, socialism and communism differ in their views on capitalism. Socialists regard capitalism as a threat to equality and public interest. They believe, however, that there is no need to eliminate the capitalist class because it can be used as a good instrument in the transition to socialism as long as it is properly controlled. Socialists also believe that capitalism can exist in a socialist state and vice versa. From the point of view of the communists, capitalism must to be destroyed totally in order to give way to a classless society.

Summary:

1. Socialism is an economic system while communism is both an economic and political system.2. In socialism, the resources of the economy are managed and controlled by the people themselves through communes or councils while in communism, management and control rest on a few people in a single authoritarian party.3. Socialists distribute wealth to the people based on an individuals productive efforts while communists farm out wealth based on an individuals needs.4. Socialists can own personal properties while communists can not.5. Socialism allows capitalism to exist in its midst while communism seeks to get rid of capitalism.

Citerolando. "Difference between Socialism and Communism." DifferenceBetween.net. July 18, 2017 .

Written by : rolando. and updated on July 18, 2017

Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.

More here:
Difference between Socialism and Communism

[A selection from One Is a Crowd by Frank Chodorov]:

This is a defense of our universities. As they open their doors for another year of business they teach under a widespread suspicion of teaching communism. The suspicion is unsupported by fact; it is pure witchcraft. There is reason to believe that some in the facultiesadvocatecommunism, but noneteachesit. The distinction is important. To illustrate the point, in the field of religion there are many who are intellectually incapable of comprehending Christianity, and therefore of teaching it, but who are quite adept at advocating (preaching) it. So with communism; it is a pattern of ideas following from basic assumptions, and unless one has made a critical examination of these assumptions one is incapable of evaluating the superimposed ideas. Our colleges are debarred from examining the basic assumptions of communism because, as I will attempt to show, these basic assumptions are part and parcel of what is called capitalism, the going order, and it would hardly do to bring this fact to light.

If it is the business of universities to expose students to ideas, they are not doing the job properly if they neglect to includein their curricula a course in communism, simply because as a system of thought, a philosophy, communism is in the ascendancy these days. A graduate ought to be thoroughly at home with the ideas he has to live with, he ought to understand the basic postulates of his ideological environment. It might be difficult to dig up professors able to brush aside the seductive phrases of communism so as to get to its roots, seeing how the subject is beclouded with war hysteria, and expedience might tell against the introduction of such a course of study. This is regrettable. For, lacking the opportunity to investigate communism, the students will come away from their education with the popular notion that it is indigenous to an enemy nation or an inferior people. To illustrate the kind of course I have in mindthis isnotan application for a job; perish the thought!I present herewith a few samples of communist theory that are equally the marrow of current true Americanism. At random, we will begin with a conception of wages.

It is an axiom of communism that wages are a fraction of production given to the workers by those who own the means of production. Boiled down to its essence, this idea can be expressed in three words: capital pays wages. But, is that so in fact? If we define capital as the tools of production, this conception of wages becomes silly, for an inanimate object is incapable of paying anything. If, as the communists do, we include in the definition the owners of capital, we are faced with anotherreductio ad absurdum:competition between these machine owners for the services of machine users automatically fixes the level of wages; capitalists are without the means of affecting the ups and downs of that level.

The capitalist, of course, speaks of the wages he pays. But, he is quick to point out that the wages do not come out ofhis capital, but are derived from the sale of his products; if the market does not absorb the output of his plant he ceases to be a payer of wages. This means that the envelopes he hands out to his employees are filled by the consumers, and these are, in large part, the workers themselves. Thus, the employer of labor is labor, and the wage earner is the wage payer. It follows that the general level of wages is determined by the general level of productionleaving out, for the moment, any purloiningand neither capital nor capitalist has any part in fixing it.

It follows also that political power can in no way affect an increase in wages; nor can capital by itself do so. Wages can go up only as a result of increased production, due to an increase in population or improvement in the skill and industry of the current population. That elemental fact will be admitted even by professors of economics, and it is possible that some legislators will recognize it. Yet, if you dig into some standard economics textbooks or examine the labor legislation of our land you will find ideas that stem from the communist notion that capital pays wages and that the hardheaded capitalist keeps them low. A minimum-wage law, for instance, is based on that notion; the law assumes that cupidity is at the bottom of the marginal worker's low income; the capitalists must be compelled to disgorge. All of which is silly, for the legally enforced increase is simply passed on to the consumer, unless it can be absorbed by increased production arising from technological improvement. Yet, in the course I suggest, it would have to be pointed out that minimum-wage lawsthat all legislation dealing with labor-employer relationsare concessions to the communist conception of wages.

Our immigration-restriction laws pay homage to this idea, for these laws, translated into economics, simply say that there are just so many jobs that capitalists have at their disposal, thatany increase in the working population will lower the wage level by simple division; the idea that the immigrant makes his own wages is rejected offhand. Birth control is likewise advocated as a means of raising the wage level, and Malthusianism borrows all its economics from communism. And, if you go to the bottom of our social welfare enthusiasm you will find the capital-culprit notion.

Space does not permit an examination of all the facets of current thought traceable to this basic bit of communism, but it is evident that the proposed course could do quite a job on it.

This brings us to the communist indictment of private property. The inherent power of capital to fix the level of wages will be used by its owners to defraud the laborers. They will see to it that the laborers receive just enough to keep them alive and on the job, retaining all above that level for themselves. Here communism introduces the doctrine of natural rights, although it denies that doctrine vehemently later on; it says that the laborers have an absolute right in all that is produced by virtue of the energy put into production; energy is a private possession. If this is so, then what the capitalist keeps for himself amounts to robbery. The word generally used isexploitation. This iniquitous arrangement brings on a host of evil social consequences and should therefore be stopped. How? By outlawing private capital. Everything that is produced should belong to the community as a whole (which, by the way, is a flat denial of the original right of the laborer to his product), and the state, acting for the community, must be made sole owner and operator of all capital. The state, particularly when manned by communists, will have no interest in exploitation and will pay wages in full.

The holes in that indictment are many and serious, and wecan leave it to our professor in communism to point them out. It would then be incumbent on him also to point out that capitalism, in practice, accepts the indictment in large chunks. A number of institutions have grown up under capitalism that are obviously concessions to the charge brought against it by communism. The absorption by the state of large parts of the electric power business was facilitated by moral fustian about the power trust, while political participation in the banking, housing, insurance, and several other businesses is justified on the inadequacies, if not villainies, of private capital. Thus, while capitalism carries on its word battle with communism, it pays its adversary the high compliment of accepting its doctrine in practice.

Our professor of communism could, and should, emphasize this point by an analysis of taxation, particularly the direct kind. Income taxes unequivocally deny the principle of private property. Inherent in these levies is the postulate that the state has a prior lien on all the production of its subjects; what it does not take is merely a concession, not a right, and it reserves for itself the prerogative of altering the rates and the exemptions according to its requirements. It is a matter of fiat, not contract. If that is not communist principle, what is? The professor would have to point that out. And he should, in all conscience, show that the considerable amount of capital now owned and operated by the capitalistic state was siphoned out of pockets of producers by means of taxation.

But right here the professor would find himself in a mess of trouble. On the other side of the hall the professor of taxation and the professor of political science would be telling their students that the right of property is conditional, not absolute, that the owner is in fact a trustee answerable to society as a whole. They would deny that this is a concession to communistprinciple; but it is. The professor of philosophy would pitch in with an outright rejection of the theory of natural rights, asserting that what we call rights are but privileges granted to his subjects by the sovereign. The board of trustees would also take notice; the university and its supporters hold a lot of government bonds which are dependent on the power of taxation, and it would hardly do to question the propriety of this power. And, if the professor presumed to point out that communism is quite consistent in advocating taxation as a means of destroying private capital, he would have the whole house of respectability on his head.

A few more topics that our course in fundamental communism should touch uponand then we can close up shop.

Reverting to the concept of natural rightsbasic in capitalistic thoughtwe find that its taproot is the will to live. Out of this primordial desire for existence comes the idea that no man may lay claim to another man's life. How does that idea line up with military conscription? It doesn't, and the only way you can logically support conscription is to invoke the communist principle that the right to life is conditioned by the needs of the state.

Take the subject of monopoly. Communism makes much of it, although by a strange twist of logic it sees in state monopoly all the virtues lacking in private monopoly. Capitalism, in theory at least, equally condemns monopoly, on the ground that any restriction of competition lowers the general level of production and is a deterrent to human aspirations. An examination of the anatomy of monopoly reveals that its vital organ is the power to restrict production, and the source of this power is the state. Without some law favorable to its purpose every monopoly would disintegrate. Hence, the very fact of monopoliesunder a regime of capitalismsometimes called free enterpriselends support to the communist assertion that the state is a committee managing affairs for the benefit of monopolists.

In discussing monopolies the class would most certainly hit upon the topic of exploitation; that is, any legal means for getting something for nothing. Having disposed of the untenable proposition that the ownership of capital is in itself a means of exploitation, the professor, being a man of intellectual integrity, would be compelled to admit that the object of monopoly is exploitation, and that the state, in establishing the special privileges which spawn monopolies, is the guilty one. He might go so far as to declare the stateeven the dictatorship of the proletariatthe only exploitative factor in any economy.

And so on and so on. In dissecting communism and exposing its vital parts to view, this proposed course would demonstrate the unpleasant truth that capitalist practice too often squares with communist theory. That might prove disquieting to the established departments of law, social science, historyto say nothing of the mahogany office up front. It might also disturb the students, inured as they are to a quasi-communist quasi-capitalist environment.

Under the circumstances, no college could entertain the idea of introducing into its curriculum a course in communism, and the charge that they are teaching the subject is unfounded. That they make concessions to communist theory in many of their courses is true, but that is a requirement put upon them by the as-is capitalism. And I might add that I have no fear of being asked by any college president to offer the proposed course.

Continued here:
Let's Teach Communism | Mises Wire

EDITORS NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldbergs weekly newsletter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays.

Dear Reader (including those of you who can imagine a great Dear Reader gag here),

The New York Times is not widely known as a hotbed of necromancy the mystical science of communicating with or even raising the dead but Im starting to wonder if it is trying to get my late father to come back to earth so he can walk through the Gray Ladys offices and slap the editors with a semi-frozen mackerel.

The Times has been running a series on Communism called The Red Century. Its really, really weird. At times, it feels like the greatest high-brow trolling effort in recorded history. Some of the headlines read like they were plucked from the reject pile at The Onion. I particularly enjoyed Why Women Had Better Sex Under Socialism. One wonders what all the women who had to service their prison guards for a crust of bread would think about that. With the exception of one essay by Harvey Klehr, the upshot seems to be an effort to rehabilitate Communism for a certain kind of New York Times liberal who desperately needs to cling to the belief that he was on the right side of an argument he lost.

The tone is less Communism was awesome and more Well, we sophisticated people understand it was a mixed bag, so lets focus on the bright spots. E.g., Maos collectivization liberated women from domestic service and put them to work in factories (that is the millions of women who werent killed in the process).

This passage from Vivian Gornicks gauzy memoir of Communism captures the overall spirit of the series (emphasis mine):

Most Communists never set foot in party headquarters, laid eyes on a Central Committee member, or were privy to policy-making sessions. But every rank-and-filer knew that party unionists were crucial to the rise of industrial labor; party lawyers defended blacks in the South; party organizers lived, worked, and sometimes died with miners in Appalachia; farm workers in California; steel workers in Pittsburgh. What made it all real were the organizations the party built: the International Workers Order, the National Negro Congress, the Unemployment Councils. Whenever some new world catastrophe announced itself throughout the Depression and World War II, The Daily Worker sold out in minutes.

It is perhaps hard to understand now, but at that time, in this place, the Marxist vision of world solidarity as translated by the Communist Party induced in the most ordinary of men and women a sense of ones own humanity that ran deep, made life feel large; large and clarified. It was to this clarity of inner being that so many became not only attached, but addicted. No reward of life, no love nor fame nor wealth, could compete with the experience. It was this all-in-allness of world and self that, all too often, made of the Communists true believers who could not face up to the police state corruption at the heart of their faith, even when a 3-year-old could see that it was eating itself alive.

I wrote about Gornicks essay on the Corner at the time, so I wont dwell on it now. But the ideas here and throughout the series are fairly obvious, because so many of them hardened into sad clichs long ago. The motives were good! The revolution was betrayed! Real socialism is a worthy goal! Its never been tried!

Frankly, I find the Twitter feed of the Socialist Party of Great Britain more entertaining and more honest:

Its an incredibly useful debating tactic to say that every failed socialist country wasnt really socialist because it had a ruling class. The problem is that there will never be a true socialist country because ruling classes are inevitable. The unapologetic reds should spend a little less time reading Marx and read more Max Nomad, Milovan Djilas, Max Schachtman, James Burnham, and other Communists and former Communists who understood that any attempt to create a true socialist society runs into the Iron Law of Oligarchy. Every organization requires some small group of people to make important decisions. They may use their special knowledge and power to help people, but its also a sure bet that they will use it to help themselves as well. A society without democratic institutions and market mechanisms by its nature will invest bureaucrats with enormous power to make choices about how other people will live.

Anyway, what got me thinking about Communism in the first place was this story. It turns out that Russian meddling in the election wasnt reserved for generating an army of MAGA Twitter bots:

A social media campaign calling itself Blacktivist and linked to the Russian government used both Facebook and Twitter in an apparent attempt to amplify racial tensions during the U.S. presidential election, two sources with knowledge of the matter told CNN.

This is amusing for a bunch of reasons, but the relevant one brings us back to the Times Red Century stuff. It is absolutely true that many dedicated American Communists and Communist sympathizers cared sincerely and passionately about civil rights. And that cause was indeed good and noble. But what gets left out of the picture is that Soviet support for their cause was not good and noble. It was, simply, evil and cynical. First of all, the notion that a totalitarian dictatorship that murdered and enslaved its own people actually cared about civil rights for Americans shouldnt have passed the laugh test.

But on the matter of Russias meddling in American politics, the hypocrisy of American liberals isnt remotely captured by shouting Romney was right! about Russia.

Russias meddling in American politics has continued, with only the briefest interruption in the 1990s, for a century. Liberals may only recently have discovered fake news but that crap has been made in Russia for decades. The Soviets, with the aid of useful idiots and even-more-useful agents, convinced large swathes of the world that the CIA created AIDS. During the Korean War, they fabricated confessions and other evidence that America used biological-warfare weapons. The Soviets undermined democratic societies and developing countries throughout the world with conspiracy theories planted in newspapers and TV shows and peddled by seemingly legitimate academics. Moscows Patrice Lumumba University (no really) granted Ph.D.s in Holocaust denial and anti-Zionist canards.

The Soviets loved black radicals in the U.S. not because they gave a rats ass about black empowerment or civil rights but because they wanted to sow unrest in America. At minimum, they liked to use images of civil unrest for even greater propaganda victories. But the ultimate goal, until the very end of the Cold War, was the collapse of the United States.

Id go into further detail, but ThinkProgress actually has a very good article on this history:

For instance, as described in Christopher Andrews The Sword and the Shield, a detailed composition of KGB operations compiled by a former KGB archivist, Soviet operations to stoke racial tensions spiked in the 1960s and 1970s. In 1967, Moscow aimed at removing Martin Luther King, Jr., from his leadership role within the broader civil rights movement. Per Andrew, KGB higher-ups approved a plan to place articles in the African press, which could then be reprinted in American newspapers, portraying King as an Uncle Tom who was secretly receiving government subsidies to tame the civil rights movement and prevent it threatening the Johnson administration. (Writes Andrew, MLK was probably the only prominent American to be the target of active measures by both the FBI and the KGB.)

As War is Borings Darien Cavanaugh added, the campaign sought to replace King with Stokely Carmichael, hoping a less pacifist leader would help spark a race war within the U.S. The drive also included, in a harbinger of the Facebook ads to come, distributing fabricated pamphlets that showed far-right groups bent on developing a plan for the physical elimination of leading figures in the Negro movement in the U.S.

Growing bolder by the early 1970s, the KGB moved beyond innuendo into a far more violent strain of its campaign. Moscow higher-ups including then-KGB chief Yuri Andropov, who would eventually lead the Soviet Union in the early 1980s signed off on pamphlets, to be sent to African-American militants, which said that Jewish vigilante groups viewed them as black mongrels. Writes Cavanaugh, the pamphlets were distributed to 30 black militant groups in the New York area.

Meanwhile, the KGB approved a plan to release explosives in the Negro section of New York, with one KGB official suggesting bombing one of the Negro colleges as a back-up option. Following the planned bombing, KGB agents would then issue anonymous phone calls to two or three black organizations, claiming that the explosion was the work of the Jewish Defense League.

I know this is running long, but two points need to be made. First, when you read about how American Communists and fellow-travelers had the best of intentions and were on the right side of history, bear in mind that these people were at best noble dupes and useful idiots for an evil empire.

Second, for the conservatives out there who have suddenly developed a strange new respect for Vladimir Putin because hes a strong leader or some other flaming garbage, you should keep in mind that the former KGB agent is an unapologetic creature of that evil empire, shorn of Marxist pretense. He is doing to America today what he was trained to do.

Various & Sundry

By now, youve probably heard that the podcast is up and running. The debut episode featured renowned corn-stalk-urination specialist Ben Sasse. For the second episode, I invited my cellmate from Rykers, Yuval Levin.

No one knows better than this guy that its still a work in progress. But the early reviews have been pretty positive. Im still eager for feedback. Im married to nothing (except my wife). Well probably get some new music in there soon (send your suggestions), and Ive got all kinds of weird ideas about the format, but Im open to hearing more (if someone can figure out how to incorporate dogs as podcast guests, Id love to hear from you). Im told that its very important that you give it 8 trillion stars at iTunes and other platforms and that you actually subscribe. At a minimum, I would love to have more subscribers than that villainous coven podcast The Editors.

Canine Update: Because I believe in honest reporting in this newsletter, I feel compelled to share the shame of the Goldberg house these days. One of the dogs has been pooping in the house. We dont know whos doing it, though I suspect its Pippa. One of the great things about having a Carolina dog is that they are, like Sir John Gielgud, very private poopers. When were in the woods, Zo prefers to run off out of sight and do her business in some secret ancient poop burial ground. Meanwhile, Pippa is like some eccentric British aristocrat and thinks her poop is a problem for the help to take care of. Anyway, its dismaying because we dont think either of them is sick, and they keep pointing the damning paw of blame at each other. The cats think its all disgusting.

Meanwhile the only other thing of note to report is that Pippa was shnurfling around in some leaves the other day and uncovered a frog that proceeded to jump right into her face. Our cherished dogwalker Kirsten said that Pippa let out a shriek that frightened all of the other dogs in the pack, along with Kirsten herself. Pippa had PTSD for a while afterwards. Im actually at a conference in upstate New York right now, but Im told that the beasts miss me greatly (File photos). Almost as much as I miss them.

Book Update: Im not sure I officially told you folks yet, but the manuscript has been accepted by the publisher. So now I am waiting for page proofs, which is a whole different level of Book Hell. The pub date is set for late April, and Im going to be doing a lot of promotion for it in the spring. If you know of an organization that might want to host an event in 2018 for the book, please let me know. You can send an email to [emailprotected].

Oh, and just a reminder for folks in Northern California: I will be speaking to the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley next week.

ICYMI...

Last weeks G-File

The Las Vegas shooting and politicization

Tevi Troy for HHS secretary

The Republican base is beyond Trumps control.

My interview with Hugh Hewitt about Tevi Troy

The second episode of my new podcast, with guest star Yuval Levin

The NRA doesnt buy its support.

And now, the weird stuff.

Debbys Friday Links

The abandoned Soviet germ-warfare island

Were probably not living in a computer simulation

Jeremy Benthams head exhumed

Drunk man claims to be time traveler from the future to warn about aliens

If aliens exist, well know by 2035

A 30-foot, 900-pound snake

(But can it turn into James Earl Jones?)

Painting art with flight paths

Did something come before the Big Bang?

Are space, time, and gravity all just illusions?

Do you want to own a toilet museum?

Saint Nicks tomb found?

The Battle of Athens (Georgia)

The history of the X-Ray

Londons creepiest cemetery

Go here to see the original:
New York Times Communism Series -- Red Century & Lies ...

Jesus: Prophecy of Scourges on Italy and Invasions by Communism

"Daughter, My dear child, soon Italy will suffer the consequences of her mistakes.

She is walking in the darkness of darkness, since she abandoned the precepts givenby the Lord.

Although she has been the seat of Peter, even more she will be responsible for the scourges drawn upon herself.

Have you all forgotten what it was expected by a nation destined to become holy, being the seat of the Vicar of Christ on Earth.

You[1] (the Italians) should have set an example for other countries and bring other nations to Me, the Savior.

You (the Italians) are at the mercy of the spirit of the world, unable to follow the rules given by The Most High, instead you devoted your time to activities far from God, building sand castles on the shore of a stormy sea.

The faculties you have been able to come in possession and the way you pretend to manage political and social activities, have nothing to do with the Project of a holy nation God as designated.

You will see the wrath of the Father falling on of the southern shores[2] (of Italy), on account of injustices and of the intemperance, the disorderly living that characterizes this area of the nation.

Nevertheless, if the south (part of the country of Italy) will be hit by rough seas and wide-ranging earthquakes, all this will be expanding like wildfire: from the center of the capital people will cry and will get scared at unexpected happenings.

Rome will witness events that will be known worldwide.

Rome has thrown mud on My Holy Vicar[3], making the heart of the Church suffer.

Rome will see the decay of the great works built by the hands of men; wondrous monuments will be leveled to the ground, being for very long time an offense in the eyes of My Father. Being idolized as great wonders, they will fall and will cease to exist.

Purify[4] (nation of Italy), bend your knees to the power of The Most High, you who have been the spectator of the martyrdom of Peter, and that do not cease to condemn to death the Christ Himself, nailing Him to the cross and beating Him in a mercilessly flagellation.

Rome will cry.

Italy will look helpless when armies will invade her streets and will take possession of the freedom of the people, by imposing the terrible law of communism[5].

Italy will raise her eyes towards Me and will cry asking for mercy.

And as quickly as said, Justice will fall on the heads of those responsible for this abomination toward the Italian people.

Children, the time of conversion and of the Act of Mercy is approaching rapidly.

Try to be prepared at all times, because you never know when the set time of events will come.

Also understand that all will be preceded by specific facts, some of which might be changed by the Will of the Father, you will have to stay with your ears open in listening to the Voice of God, and keep your clothes washed to welcome the Bridegroom.

I will knock at the door (of your soul) when you least expect it and you'll be taken by surprise, for the large number of you.

Nothing happens by chance, in the end.

Nothing comes by itself, if not from The Father Himself.

Each event has its own designated purpose, such as a tile that is added to the puzzle until the design is clearly visible.

Do not lose hope, but act upon it by waking up and preparing those fallen asleep because of the mundane world and the passions that obscure the truth.

Gather as many souls as possible under the protection of My Blood and the Immaculate Mantle of My Mother.

Pray for them, saying:

Lord Jesus, bend the knees of these souls (you can specify the names) by putting them at the foot of Thy Holy Cross and fill them with the power of Your Precious Blood.

I will take them and will put them at the foot of the Holy Cross, washing them with My Blood.

It will be repelled in them every demonic influence that can harm themselves and others, in order to save them all.

Act accordingly and be aware that with the Power of My Name and of My Blood, you will have in your hands the victory over the forces of evil.

Because whoever acts in My Name and believes in Me, acquires a limitless force and the Power of the (Holy) Spirit will blow strongly.

Your Jesus, Priest and King of the Universe."

Notes:

[1] Here The Lord (to my understanding) refers to religious authorities, political rulers and the people of Italy

[2] Shores of Southern Italy

[3] Most likely (to my understanding) The Lord refers here to Benedict XVI

[4] Italy - (to my understanding) here The Lord refers to its religious, political institutions and to its people being corrupted by laws in open defiance of the 10 Commandments, of the Catholic Church (being infiltrated by the ecclesiastic branch of freemason which is working tirelessly from the Vatican II Council; to change, manipulate the Catholic Faith, Doctrine and Teaching, by introducing heresies and abomination - by introducing Protestant heresies, eliminating Confession, the suppression of the Sacraments of the Eucharist; to accept sin in many of its aberrant ways and forms; to accept divorced to Holy Communion, sexual behaviors against nature and the Moral Law; to destroy the Mystical Body on Earth instituted 2000 years ago by our Lord Jesus Christ).

[5] Communism here does not refer to the Soviet Union as nation of invaders because it dissolved in the 20th century, or to the modern Holy Russia, having rejected it. Here Communism refers to Socialism propagated by the enemies of the Cross the descendants of the sect of the Pharisees, the elites now turned into bankers (not to be confused with the Jewish people of humble condition, farmers, fishermen, pastors, or other professions like the one of Jesus, simple carpenter born in the small village of Bethlehem of Judea (now Palestine). Read history about the origin of those who theorized and imposed socialism/communism by brute force firstly in Russia and then to other countries and people in the world (i.e. China, North Korea, political, economic, religious parties, institutions and movements, etc.). Socialism (the nice face of the old Communism) is no longer being imposed through force but instead, through a stealth and cunning disguise, by a series of laws (i.e. civil rights, economic treaties, religious changes, humanism, all the ism you can think of), aiming at gradually taking away sovereignty, people freedom and cultural, national, historical identities, and their physical properties/money). In other word, think of a pond where fish are constrained to live with less and less water until it runs out, where only certain ponds of the elites (rulers) choice, will be allowed to live and prosper (i.e. by eliminating the 90% of the current population see Georgia Guidestones). Socialism is the most dangerous form of political and economic (stealing of properties and sovereignty), and religious oppression (by one side imposing atheism, bythe other oneimposing a babel of religions and faiths under - one world church, with the purpose ofenslaving mankind and wiping out from the face of the earth, if that were possible, the Catholic Church who stands in their way, the Truth that we are children of God Creator of the human race, the Truth of the Gospel revealed by Jesus Christ,). Socialism willallow a small group, to rule abovemankind; these oligarchs called the elite", will decide who lives and who dies if unfit to their draconian global ruling system in which they are accountable to no one for their choices. This stage should take place (to my understanding) after the deadly and quick incoming nuclear WW3. Each world war (WW1 and WW2) has brought great changes to mankind.

"Figlia, Mia cara bambina, presto l'Italia subir le conseguenze dei propri errori.Essa cammina nel buio delle tenebre, da quando ha abbandonato i precetti designati dal Signore.

Seppur essa fu sede di Pietro, ancor di pi sar responsabile dei flagelli attirati su di s.

Avete dimenticato quanto ci si aspettava da una nazione destinata a diventare santa, poich sede del Vicario di Cristo in terra.

Avreste dovuto essere d'esempio per altri paesi e condurre altri popoli a Me, il Salvatore.

Invece siete in bala dello spirito del mondo, incapaci di seguire le regole imposte dall' Altissimo e dedicate il tempo ad attivit lontane da Dio, costruendo castelli di sabbia in riva a un mare in tempesta.

Le facolt di cui vi siete appropriati e il modo in cui pretendete di gestire attivit politiche e sociali non ha nulla a che vedere con il Progetto di nazione santa designata da Dio.

Vedrete l'ira del Padre abbattersi nelle coste del meridione, a causa delle ingiustizie e dell'intemperanza, del vivere disordinato che caratterizza questa zona della nazione.

Nondimeno, se il sud sar colpito dal mare agitato e da scosse sismiche ad ampio raggio, il tutto si andr espandendo a macchia d'olio: dal centro della capitale urleranno e si spaventeranno per fatti inaspettati.

Roma sar testimone di eventi che faranno no parlare a livello mondiale.

Roma ha gettato fango sul Mio Santo Vicario, facendo soffrire il cuore della Chiesa.

Roma vedr il decadimento delle grandi opere costruite dalla mano degli uomini; monumenti portentosi saranno rasi al suolo, poich per lunghissimo tempo sono stati offesa per gli occhi del Padre Mio.

Idolatrati come grandi meraviglie, cadranno e cesseranno di esistere.

Purficati, piega le ginocchia alla Potenza dell' Altissimo, tu che sei stata spettatrice del martirio di Pietro e che non cessi di condannare a morte il Cristo Stesso, inchiodandoLo alla Croce e percuotendoLo in una flagellazione senza piet.

Roma pianger.

L'Italia apparir impotente, quando gli eserciti invaderanno le vie e si impossesseranno della libert del popolo, assoggettandolo alla terribile legge del comunismo.

L'Italia sollever gli occhi verso di Me e pianger chiedendo misericordia.

presto fatto, che la Giustizia ricadr sulle teste dei responsabili di tale abominio verso il popolo italiano.

Figli, il tempo della conversione e dell' Atto di Misericordia si avvicina rapidamente.

Cercate di prepararvi in ogni istante, perch non sapete quando il tempo prestabilito giunger.

Fermo restando che sar preceduto da fatti specifici, alcuni dei quali potrebbero cambiare per Volont del Padre, dovrete restare con le orecchie in ascolto alla Voce di Dio e lavare le vesti per accogliere lo Sposo.

Busser quando meno ve lo aspettate e sarete colti di sorpresa, per la maggior parte di voi.

Nulla al caso, infine.

Nulla viene da s, se non dal Padre Stesso.

Ogni evento ha un suo scopo designato, come una tessera che si aggiunge al rompicapo fino a che il disegno sia ben visibile.

Non perdete la speranza, ma agite di conseguenza svegliando e preparando gli assopiti dal mondano e dalle passioni che oscurano la Verit.

Radunate quante pi anime possibili sotto la protezione del Mio Sangue e il Manto Immacolato di Mia Madre.

Pregate per loro dicendo:

Signore Ges, piega le ginocchia di queste anime (si possono specificare dei nomi) mettendole ai piedi della Tua Santa Croce e inondale con la Potenza del Tuo Preziosissimo Sangue.

Le prender e le porr ai piedi della Santa Croce, lavandole con il Mio Sangue.

Sar debellato in esse ogni influsso demoniaco che possa nuocere alle stesse e agli altri, al fine di salvarle tutte.

Agite di conseguenza e siete consapevoli che con la Potenza del Mio Nome e del Mio Sangue avrete in mano la vittoria sulle forze del male.

Perch chiunque agisce nel Mio Nome e crede in Me, acquista una forza senza limite e la Potenza dello Spirito soffier fortemente.

Il vostro Ges, Sacerdote e Re dell' Universo".

Excerpt from:
Jesus: Prophecy of Scourges on Italy and invasions by ...