Mediaboss Marketing

Thirty-five years ago this month, President Reagan delivered what is now considered one of his most consequential speeches. Standing in Londons Palace of Westminster, he predicted that the Soviet regime would end up on the ash-heap of history, provided the forces of freedom and democracy not only held firm, but supported one another.

This address is remembered chiefly as a vindication of Reagans muscular opposition to communism. Yet the speech was no mere jeremiad against the Marxist-Leninism it marked the beginning of an historic foray into helping to build the architecture of democracy worldwide.

It is poignant, yet perhaps fitting, that the anniversary of Reagans landmark speech should fall in close proximity to the latest terrorist attack on the city in which it was delivered, and to which the world owes so much in the development of modern democracy.

While Reagans address focused on the fight against communism, his central ethos is entirely relevant to the war against violent extremism. He said, The ultimate determinant in the struggle thats now going on in the world will not be bombs and rockets, but a test of wills and ideas, a trial of spiritual resolve, the values we hold, the beliefs we cherish, the ideals to which we are dedicated.

We know we have the military strength to defeat ISIS on the battlefield. Even with limited U.S.-backing, Iraqi forces have been able to retake most areas of Iraq formerly occupied by ISIS. We know that our intelligence agencies are working hard to avert countless plots against domestic targets. And we know that, eventually, ISIS will be defeated.

The question is, how much slaughter are we willing to tolerate in the meantime and what comes next? As we know all-too-well, terrorist groups such as ISIS, Al Nusra and Al Qaeda have found fertile recruiting ground amidst the chaos in Syria and Iraq. When not pressed into service through force, a combination of desperation, misguided devotion and sheer opportunism drives young Syrians and Iraqis to join ISIS.

Yet even in countries like Tunisia which, as a burgeoning democracy, remains the sole success story of the Arab Spring young people are leaving in droves to become foreign fighters. The drivers are complex, but it is clear that at least one of the motivations is a profound feeling of disenfranchisement and hopelessness the sense of many young adults that their voice is not heard, and that they have no stake in the future of their country. In contrast, the Islamic State offers the false promise of adventure, of absolute certainty, and perhaps most importantly, of purpose and self-worth.

Democracy assistance programs supported by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the congressionally-funded National Endowment for Democracy are helping countries such as Tunisia to combat vulnerabilities to extremism by building a better future for their people. Through my involvement as a board member of the International Republican Institute, Ive seen the incredible impact of these efforts first-hand.

By deploying our expertise to support and strengthen democratic institutions such as the rule of law, representative government and free expression, the U.S. can help to stabilize and strengthen vulnerable countries and undercut the appeal of violent extremism. This approach complements military and counterintelligence efforts, and has been widely cited by military leaders as a crucial means of preventing costly future interventions. As General James Mattis observed when asked about funding for foreign assistance programs,If you don't fund the State Department, then I need to buy more ammunition ultimately Its a cost-benefit ratio.

In the 35 years since President Reagan launched his campaign for democracy, weve seen numerous examples of successful transitions to democracy, ranging from the former Eastern Bloc to Indonesia. Those transitions were very often aided by the institutes which arose in the wake of the Westminster speech. And at less than 1 percent of the total U.S. government expenditure, its hard to argue against the wisdom of our investment.

This work is by no means easy, nor does it always yield immediate returns. It requires patience, fortitude and commitment to long-term strategic objectives. Yet as President Reagan recognized, evil cannot be vanquished by weapons alone. Ultimately, terrorism wont be defeated just with superior weaponry, but by helping to build stronger societies capable of consigning this scourge to the ash-heap of history.

Kelly AyotteKelly AyotteOPINION: Democracy will send ISIS to the same grave as communism Kelly Ayotte joins defense contractor's board of directors Week ahead: Comey firing dominates Washington MORE served in the U.S. Senate for New Hampshire from 2011 to 2017. She is now a member of the board of directors at the International Republican Institute, a nonprofit organization focused on advancing democracy around the world.

The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.

Read this article:
OPINION: Democracy will send ISIS to the same grave as communism - The Hill (blog)

Forbes

Greece's Long Love Affair With Soviet-Maoist Communism Forbes Greece's biggest problem isn't a heavy debt burden. It's the love affair of its citizens with Soviet-Maoist communism, a system that wastes the country's resources and talent, killing sensible economic growth initiatives. Greece never became a ...

The rest is here:
Greece's Long Love Affair With Soviet-Maoist Communism - Forbes

President Trump announced his decision on Friday to partially reverse the previous administration's Cuba policies during in speech in Miami. "It's hard to think of a policy that makes less sense than the prior administration's terrible and misguided deal with the Castro regime," Trump said.

The president seized the opportunity to issue a forceful and vivid rebuke of the island nation's communist regime. "Many of you witnessed terrible crimes committed in service of a depraved ideology. You saw the dreams of a generation held captive. And, just literally, you look at what happened and what communism has done," Trump told the crowd of cheering Cuban Americans gathered in Miami's Little Havana neighborhood.

"You knew faces that disappeared, innocents locked in prisons, and believers persecuted for preaching the word of God. You watched the women in white, bruised, bloodied and captured on their way from mass. You have heard the chilling cries of loved ones or the crack so for firing squads piercing through the ocean breeze," he said. "Not a good sound."

Trump continued, drawing on the plight of the Cubans to speak more broadly about the dangers of communism as a model of government. "The exiles and dissidents here today have witnessed communism destroy a nation," the president observed, "just as communism has destroyed every single nation where it has ever been tried."

"But we will not be silent in the face of communist oppression any longer," Trump promised the crowd.

By contrast, former President Barack Obama did not use any form of the word "communism" in his May 2016 speech in Havana, choosing instead to speak of the country's "one-party system," "socialist economic model," and emphasis on "the role and rights of the state."

Emily Jashinskyis a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner.

Link:
Trump's forceful condemnation of Cuban communism - Washington Examiner

Andrea Seastrand forgets to mention Russia's communism antics The San Luis Obispo Tribune After reading Ms. Seastrands viewpoint excoriating Rep. Rob Bonta's bill about allowing communists to work in state government (California's liberal Legislature voted for communism), I had a few questions for her. She listed many current regimes that ...

Continue reading here:
Andrea Seastrand forgets to mention Russia's communism antics - The San Luis Obispo Tribune

Joseph Morris

President at Lincoln Legal Foundation

Born and reared in Gary, Indiana, Joseph Morris earned his A.B. and J.D. degrees from the University of Chicago. He held several positions in the Reagan administration, and heads the Lincoln Legal Foundation individual liberties, limited, constitutional government. He is also on the board of advisers of the conservative Federalist Society, and is a former managing editor of The American Spectator. Over the years, he has held leadership positions in the Republican Party, including president of the United Republican Fund Illinois.

I put nailed in the headline of this post and, as you will see, I was being both accurate andrisqu. Bear with me.

In my opinion, Terry Teachout of The Wall Street Journal is the best theater critic in the business today.

On Friday he revisited a play, 4000 Miles by playwright Amy Herzog, that he has reviewed before in prior productions. Its now on the stage in Hartford, Connecticut, and he looks at it afresh.

Mr. Teachout praises everything about the play, from the text itself to the staging and the acting. He points out that the play has an overt, but subtle, anti-communist theme. Overtly, but subtly, is often the best way in which art can instruct us, and those who would join the Gramscian battle against socialists and statists for control of the high ground of culture and the academy should take note.

Of course, overt and subtle can be elastic terms, which you will understand upon reading the review and learning that a major characters denunciation of communism is delivered with an epithet and an analogy to non-consensual anal sex.

We live in times in which the overt and the subtle are not prized as much as they ought to be, but we must do the best, as Ms. Herzog seems to have done, as we can.

[Trigger warning (in the spirit of the age) about Mr. Teachouts review: He quotes the epithet, the f-word, which he defuses with the customary three stars.]

Teachout Reviews a Play in Which Communism Is Nailed as the Ignoble Flaw was last modified: June 16th, 2017 by Joseph Morris

See original here:
Teachout Reviews a Play in Which Communism Is Nailed as the Ignoble Flaw - Somewhat Reasonable - Heartland Institute (blog)