Mediaboss Marketing

The government's budget is "rinky-dink" and will provide some minimum-wage earners with only one extra dollar a week, Labour says.

Labour leader Andrew Little said Budget 2017 did not go far enough to support lower-income New Zealanders. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

The centrepiece of the National-led government's budget, announced today, is a $2 billion a year package that lifts the bottom two tax thresholds and increases Working For Families payments.

The bottom tax threshold (taxed at 10.5 percent) will rise from $14,000 to $22,000 and the next bracket up (taxed at 17.5 percent) will rise from $48,000 to $52,000.

But Labour leader Andrew Little told Parliament it was a "rinky-dink, short-changing, dollar-bill budget".

"For all National's talk about tax cuts, the reality is that a single cleaner on a minimum wage will get just $1 a week extra," he said.

"The big winners of this budget are the top earners who take home most of the tax benefits."

Mr Little also attacked the government's spending on health, which will receive an extra $3.9bn over the next four years, and education, which will get an extra $1.5bn.

"In health, this budget is $200 million a year short of what [district health boards] need to stand still," he said.

"In education, schools are short $70m at a time when we have overcrowding and falling standards."

The was nothing in the budget to address the housing shortage, Mr Little said.

"Too many people are squeezed into our big cities... and they've done nothing about it.

"National is only building one affordable house a day in Auckland for every 100 new Aucklanders."

On the other side of the House, Act Party leader David Seymour immediately labelled the Working For Families increases as "communism by stealth" - echoing former Prime Minister John Key's description of the policy when Labour first introduced it in 2004.

"The boost to Working for Families is the perfect example of how National is abandoning its roots," Mr Seymour said.

"The National Party is meant to believe in personal responsibility and low taxes - now they've not only adopted Labour's policies, they're championing them."

The tax bracket changes were "welcome compensation" but were underdone, he said.

"The most any taxpayer will save is $20 a week... Bracket creep will eventually cancel out this tax relief because National refuses to permanently tie brackets to inflation."

The Mori Party said it was "proud" that the budget included $122m for Mori initiatives, including an extra $10m for Whnau Ora and $21m for Mori language and culture.

It also included $1m for the Te Mana o Te Wai Fund, to improve freshwater quality, and $4m for New Zealand's climate change policies.

That was "paltry", Greens co-leader James Shaw said.

"There is nothing in this budget that will clean up our polluted rivers, lakes and streams, or protect our drinking water. A million dollars for one fund isn't going to cut it - especially when National refuses to turn pollution off at the tap."

There was nothing in the budget to stop property speculation or "rampant" investment, Mr Shaw said.

"The government expects rents to keep rising, and more people to require emergency housing. It has admitted defeat in the face of the housing crisis.

"New Zealanders will be paying the social and financial cost of National's inaction for many, many years to come."

New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said following this budget, the National Party did not deserve to be in charge for three more years.

He said there were people living in poverty, mental health services in disarray, conservation services lacking, social housing relying on motels, run-away immigration, and regions were neglected.

Mr Peters said the government was not equipped to deal with these issues.

"Budgets are meant to be about philosophy, they're meant to be what demarcates a party against all the others, they're meant to be about a plan, a vision, except the National Party came in today with no plan, no vision, no idea - just trying to hang on for three more years."

Want more detail? Read RNZ's full Budget coverage here.

Here is the original post:
Budget 2017: 'Rinky-dink' and 'communism by stealth' - Radio New Zealand

To the editor: You write that communism has led to the deaths of tens of millions of people through brutal purges, starvation policies and war. (It's 2017. Being a communist shouldn't be a barrier to public employment, editorial, May 19)

In all fairness, cannot it also be said that capitalism has led to the death of millions of people through brutal wars in Vietnam and Cambodia and tens of thousands in totalitarian regimes in Chile and Brazil, as well as the two great world wars? Go back two centuries as capitalist expansion led to the deaths of millions of native American Indians and African slaves.

The list goes on, past and present: child laborers in third world factories, workers without protection and populations without healthcare. These are the fruits not only of communism and capitalism but also of tribal and nationalist competition.

Can the human species survive its instinctive contradictions? Not until we all abandon our hubris, our irrational and tribal ideologies, our greed and our addiction to violence.

Jay W. Friedman, Los Angeles

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion and Facebook

The rest is here:
Communism kills. So does profit-craving capitalism. - Los Angeles Times

The city of Ottawa, Canada will erect a large, bronze memorial to honorthe victims of communism. The $3 million project is expected to be completed in 2018, and was planned by the countrys former Conservative government.

Despite the fact that the monument will memorialize tens of millions who died over the last century (Stalin, for instance, is believed to have killed more people than Hitler. Similarly millions of Chinese died in Maos Great Leap Forward), someon the left are peeved about the new monument. The tankies are out in full force, demanding a memorial for the victims of capitalism, colonialism and the United States, instead.

Reddits Canada community erupted in a heated argumentin the comment thread under the news of the memorial.

I meant a government going after another political ideology, one user wrote. Thats McCarthyist-era. Its like whoever thought this up just fell asleep in 1960 and woke up today and doesnt understand why people arent still rallying against communists anymore.

Should we be creating a memorial to capitalism as well? wrote another. The British East India company (one of the early multinationals) killed an estimated 10 million Indians over ten years.

Whelp, just goes to show you that even a memorial honoring the death of millions will still have complainers.

Read more:
Liberals Enraged About Canada's Plan to Build 'Victims of Communism' Memorial - Heat Street

In February, California senator Janet Nguyen (R-Santa Ana), the countrys first Vietnamese-American state legislator, whose district includes more than 100,000 people of Vietnamese descent, wasremovedfrom the Senate chamber after objecting to the lionization of deceased former state assemblyman and senator Tom Hayden, acommunist collaboratorduring the Vietnam War. Nguyen was born in Saigon a year before the city fell to the North Vietnamese forces in 1975 and legally immigrated to the United States with her family four years later, settling in southern California.

When the posthumous lionization began of Haydens service of almost two decades in California state government, Nguyen was distressed. She knew Hayden as someone who had aided and given comfort to the communist enemy in her country of origin. She felt compelled to express the sentiments of her heavily refugee-populated district, whose families had suffered greatly because of North Vietnamese brutality. The community blames the U.S. anti-war movement for undermining the war effort and contributing to the eventual victory of the North Vietnamese communists.

During the Vietnam War in the 1960s,Hayden, a prominent and vocal voice for the North Vietnamese communists, had organized a campaign with Jane Fonda, John Kerry, and Ted Kennedy to cut off American aid to the existing government of South Vietnam and cooperate with the Vietcong and Khmer Rouge. Hayden traveled to southeast Asia numerous times during the conflict to strategize with the enemy on defeating Americas anti-communist plan. When reports came to light that American soldiers were being tortured in communist captivity, he proclaimed the reports to be propaganda. Hayden and Fonda notoriously weakened the morale of American POWs by participating in broadcasts for the North Vietnamese in which they accused American troops of war crimes.

After Haydens passing October 23, 2016, the California Senate held a ceremony five months later on February 20, 2017, honoring his service to the state legislature. California Democratic Party chairman John Burton praised the former senator as one of the great visionaries and as a guy with a lot of courage. President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles) crowed, He dedicated his life to the betterment of our state and our great country through the pursuit of peace, justice and equity. Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara)applaudedHayden for his street activism against the Vietnamese war.

These undue accolades proved to be too much for Nguyen, who is aware of the truth regarding Haydens anti-war pursuits. She left the chamber and, later, unsuccessfully attempted to gain approval to recess the session later in the week in remembrance of the one million Vietnamese who died because of the war and to speak about Haydens actions in Vietnam.

Although refused permission, Nguyen returned to the Senate four days later and gave her statement anyway, speaking first in Vietnamese and then English.

Mr. Hayden sided with a communist government that enslaved and/or killed millions of Vietnamese, including members of my own family, she said. Mr. Haydens actions are viewed by many as harmful to democratic values and hateful toward those who sought the very freedoms on which this nation is founded.

Regretfully, Senator Nguyen didnt get far with her statement, as she was chastised for being out of order, had her microphone cut off, and was ultimately removed from the California Senate floor. The following weekend, over 100 local Vietnamese Americans, who felt that the memory of their lost loved ones and the brutal assault on their country had been disrespected, attended arallyin support of the senator and her right to speak out against Haydens actions.

A week later, recognizing the public relations implications of dragging a Vietnam war refugee from the state Senate floor, de Leon attempted an apology that essentially excused Nguyens removal for violating chamber rules by citing thetimingof her remarks. However, this response appeared disingenuous, given that Nguyen was denied permission to speak and, instead, told to either post her comments online or provide them following adjournment, an apparent violation of Senate rules.

In May, once again, Nguyen was forced to act on her anti-communist beliefs whenAssembly Bill 22was introduced by California assemblyman Rob Bonta (D-San Francisco). The legislation amended an existing statute for removing a public employee who is knowingly a member of the Communist party or member of an organization that advocates the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of any state by force or violence. Essentially, the bill would allow communists to work legally in California government. On May 10, the billpassedthe Assembly and was headed for a Senate vote.

Constituents from Nguyens district, often referred to as Little Saigon, were up in arms about A.B. 22. Many had lived under communist oppression and strongly protested the measure. With district support, Nguyen promptly launched a petition to oppose the legislation. Plans were readied in the local Vietnamese-American community to send protesters to Sacramento.

Claiming that his bill didnt endorse communism or encourage communism, Bonta maintained that he was protecting peoples rights and following constitutional precedents that made it illegal for government to fire employees due to their political affiliations, a claim that rang hollow for Nguyens constituents.

For now, it appears that Sen. Nguyens efforts and those of the community she represents succeeded in thwarting plans to allow those espousing communist ideologies to work in California government. On May 18, Bonta announced withdrawal of the bill and apologized to veterans and those who fled the communist regime in Vietnam. Nguyen must be commended for her valiant quest to stand up in the face of acclaim for a traitorous communist collaborator and for her actions to stop legislation that would have normalized communist ideology in the Golden State.

Guest columns do not necessarily reflect the views of Accuracy in Media or its staff.

Janet Levy, MBA, MSW, is an activist, world traveler, and freelance journalist who has contributed to American Thinker, Pajamas Media, Full Disclosure Network, FrontPage Magazine, Family Security Matters and other publications. She blogs at http://www.womenagainstshariah.com

Ready to fight back against media bias? Join us by donating to AIM today.

More:
Fighting Communism in California - Accuracy In Media

Communism is a political ideology that seeks to establish a future without social class or formalized state structure, and with social organization based upon common ownership of the means of production. It can be classified as a branch of the broader socialist movement. Communism also refers to a variety of political movements which claim the establishment of such a social organization as their ultimate goal.

Early forms of human social organization have been described as "primitive communism". However, communism as a political goal generally is a conjectured form of future social organization which has never been implemented. There is a considerable variety of views among self-identified communists, including Maoism, Trotskyism, council communism, Luxemburgism, and various currents of left communism, which are in addition to more widespread varieties. However, various offshoots of the Soviet and Maoist forms of MarxismLeninism comprise a particular branch of communism that had been the primary driving force for communism in world politics during most of the 20thcentury.

The book contains Marx and Engels' Marxist theories about the nature of society and politics, that in their own words, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." It also briefly features their ideas for how the capitalist society of the time would eventually be replaced by socialism, and then eventually communism.

In 1925 he joined the Young Communist League of Germany (KJVD). In 1929 he became a member of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD). He worked as a volunteer in the communist publishing house Kmpfer-Verlag in Chemnitz. He became a member of the regional leadership of KJVD in Saxony. In 1932 he became editor of Junge Garde ('Young Guard').

With the National Socialist takeover in Germany, Verner went into exile. Towards the end of 1933, he became a member of the Scandinavian Bureau of the Young Communist International, and edited Jugendinternationale (the German-language publication of the Young Communist International). In 1934 he shifted to Paris, were he became editor-in-chief of Junge Garde (now published in exile), a position he held until the spring of 1935. He moved to Belgium, as the KJVD reorganized. Verner fought as a volunteer in the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War. After the Spanish Civil War, he emigrated to Sweden.

4. Stalin, from the time of the first revolution leads the life of a professional revolutionist. Prisons, exiles, escapes. But during the entire period of the reaction (190711) we do not find a single document article, letter, resolution in which Stalin formulated his own appraisal of the situation and its perspectives. It is impossible that such documents do not exist. It is impossible that they are not preserved, if only in the archives of the police department. Why dont they appear in the press? It is perfectly obvious why: they are unable to strengthen the absurd characterization of the theoretical and political infallibility that the apparatus, which means Stalin himself creates for itself.

The following Wikimedia sister projects provide more on this subject:

View original post here:
Portal:Communism - Wikipedia