Archive for the ‘Communism’ Category

Communism isn’t so great – Del Rio News Herald

North Korean Communism is considered great by Americas communist party, but only 2.83 percent of their roads are paved. They are much worse off than San Felipe. All the roads in North Korea would circle Pluto 3.5 times, but only 450 miles are paved, barely the distance of New York to Cleveland. I grew up on a gravel road, but that was 75 years ago. Even the sections roads where we ran our hounds in the deep forest are now paved. Growing up we had one thing in common with North Korea, we used animal manure as a part of our fertilizing the fields. They dont have modern fertilizers, and use manure as their only source to enrich the soil.

Socialism/Communism is a failure. Bill Gates net worth of $85 to $90 billion is much greater than North Koreas Gross Domestic Product (GDP). If you really hate him, you might be a candidate for immigration. North Korean GDP is estimated at a paltry $17.4 billion, while free market USA is $16.77 trillion. One can visit North Korea, but will be assigned a care taker, who will not allow you to roam freely. They cant allow for real truth, in a failing paranoid Communist state. When any state lives on lies, loss of freedom is a must. Soldiers are everywhere, and privileges with unhampered police authority. Visitors are required to properly focus all pictures taken of statues of dictators at Mansu Hill grounds. Pictures, not meeting standards are destroyed. Can you imagine being forced to destroy a bad photograph of Trump for not meeting standards?

kA 4=2DDlQA`QmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`QmxED >2?52E@CJ E92E E62496CD =62C? E@ A=2J E96 244@C5:@? 3642FD6 E96 =6256C =:<6D :E] %96 >6? 2C6 E@=5 E@ >@56= E96:C 92:C4FED DEJ=6D 27E6C z:> y@?8 &?[ ?@ =@?86C E92? b 46?E:>6E6CD] x7 @?6 92D Sg[___[ E96J 2C6 2==@H65 E@ 56764E[ 3FE @?=J E@ r9:?2] %@FC:DED 2C6 ?@E 2==@H65 E@ D9@A 2E =@42= D9@AA:?8 2C62D[ 3FE 42? D9@A 2E DA64:2= FAD42=6 A9@?J 8@G6C?>6?E >2==] %92ED 8@@5[ 3642FD6 ?@H p??2 H:== ?6G6C H2?E E@ 8@ E@ }@CE9 z@C62 H:E9 @?=J @?6 >2==]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQA`QmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm(92E 😀 2 AC@A282?52 G:==286n %96J 92G6 @?6 H:E9 >@DE=J F?@44FA:65 9:89 C:D6 3F:=5:?8D[ @?=J 7@C D9@H 7@C E96 $@FE9 z@C62?D] %96J 42? =@@< 24C@DD E96 3@C56C[ 2?5 D66 E96 2AA62C2?46 @7 2 8C62E A9@?J =:76 7C@> 2 5:DE2?46[ 3FE 42?E C62==J 8@ E96C6] %96C6 2C6?E >2?J 9:89H2JD @C 42CD[ 3FE E92ED ?@C>2= 7@C 4@>>F?:D>] (2=<:?8 :D 4@?D:56C65 962=E9J] %96C6 2C6 >:=:E2CJ ECF4:=:E2CJ A6CD@??6= 😀 46CE2:? ;2:= E:>6] xE C6>:?5D >6 @7 E96 7246=6DD rxp 286?ED E92E %CF>A 255C6DD65 =2DE H66<] q@J 5:5 E96J 6G6C 8:G6 9:> 2 DE2?5:?8 @G2E:@?] p7E6C E96 A@=:E:42==J 4@CC64E =6256CD9:A @7 ~32>2D =67E:DE 5:C64E@C[ y@9? qC6??2?[ E96J H6C6 =:36C2E65j 7:?2==J 7C66 E@ AC@E64E p>6C:42 @G6C A@=:E:4D] x 4@F=5 766= E96 =:36C2E:@? 😕 E96 52C<6?65 C@@>[ 2?5 E2DE6 :ED DH66E?6DD]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQA`QmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qmx? }@CE9 z@C62[ :7 72>:=J >6>36CD 3C62< E96:C =2H[ :ED 4@>>@? A=246 E@ AF?:D9 E96 6?E:C6 72>:=J] p `cJ62C@=5 766=:?8 9:D (962E:6D 42? AF?:D9 9:D A2C6?ED D9@F=5 96 766= >:DEC62E65] &?=:<6 %CF>AD H2== E@ <66A A6@A=6 @FE[ E96C6 2C6 H2E49 E@H6CD 2?5 8F2C5D 6G6CJH96C6 E@ <66A A6@A=6 :?] x7 42F89E ECJ:?8 E@ 6D42A6[ :ED 4@?46?EC2E:@? 42>A C665F42E:@?[ 2?5 :7 E9@F89E E@ 36 2 EC2:E@C[ DFC6 562E9] yFDE :>28:?6 2 }@CE9 z@C62?D 56>@?DEC2E:@?[ 2D 😕 (2D9:?8E@? =2DE H66< H:E9 |25@??2 E9C62E6?:?8 E@ 3=@H FA E96 (9:E6 w@FD6] tG6? :7 J@F 2C6 4FE6C E92? 2 r9:?6D6 !F8[ 2?5 D:?8 AC6EE:6C E92? 2 >@4<:?8 3:C5[ 5:2CC962 @7 E96 >@FE9 😀 8@@5 7@C 2 7:C:?8 DBF25 2AA@:?E>6?E] $6C:@FD=J ?@H[ :D?E p>6C:42 D@CE @7 8C62Enk^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQA`QmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm$@ H96? E96J D9@@E @77 AC@G@42E:G6 >:DD:=6D D66<:?8 2 32:= @FE 7@C A6246[ p>6C:42 D9@F=5 D6C:@FD=J E9:?< 23@FE >62DFC6D 282:?DE 36?6724E@C r9:?2 E@ 3C:?8 E96> E@ E96:C D6?D6D[ C2E96C E92? 42A:EF=2E6 2D FDF2=]k^DA2?mk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQAaQmk^Am

kA 4=2DDlQA`QmkDA2? 4=2DDlQD`Qm v6?6 r92A>2? 8C6H FA @? 2 72C> 😕 pC<2?D2D 3FE 92D =:G65 @? E96 %6I2D 3@C56C 7@C >2?J J62CD] w6 😀 2 7@C>6C 492:C>2? @7 E96 '2= '6C56 r@F?EJ #6AF3=:42? !2CEJ]k^DA2?mk^Am

See the article here:
Communism isn't so great - Del Rio News Herald

Ronald Reagan: Use Democracy To Fight Hollywood Communism – The Liberty Conservative

In the recent film Trumbo, about the blacklisted screenwriterand Stalinistwho helped end the barring of communists from working in Hollywood, a sinister, bespectacled figure threatens a poverty-row filmmaker who is employing Trumbo. Fire him, the sinister figure says, or wewho he identifies as the Motion Picture Alliance For The Preservation of American Idealswill shut you down.

In point of fact, such an incident could have and probably did happen, for that organization did try to enforce the blacklisting of suspected or actual communists from studios. But the makers of this eulogy to Trumbo overshot their mark by having said sinister figure cite Ronald Reagan as one of the members. Reagan, then a liberal, but anticommunist Democrat, was not.

It is readily apparent why the liberal film-makers of Trumbo are trying to link Reagan to an unofficial enforcement branch of the blacklist (although, to be fair, many of the anticommunist members were blacklisted by Hollywood reds when the latter had more clout with the studios). Even before his presidency, an unshakeable assertion by liberals was that Reagan was a right-wing loony enforcing the blacklist against progressives.

But the real Reagan was hardly a proponent of the blacklist; indeed, as president of the Screen Actors Guild, he sought to ameliorate its effects.

Almost alone among the friendly witnesses who testified before the House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1947 regarding communism in Hollywood (the same Congressional group that would help send Trumbo to jail) Reagan advised against imposing a blacklist on communists he had personally battled within the Screen Actors Guild.

Rather than, in the words of actor Robert Taylor, sending them back to Moscow, Reagan instead asserted that the best way to oppose communists was to make democracy work. An example of this, Reagan stated, was practiced in the Screen Actors Guild by insuring everyone a vote and keeping everyone informed.

And this policy Reagan advocated for the country at large: I believe that, as Thomas Jefferson put it, if all the American people know all of the facts they will never make a mistake.

But unlike the majority of right-wingers who testified, Reagan did not favor outlawing the Communist Party. As a citizen, the actor said, I would hesitate to see any political party outlawed on the basis of its political ideology.

Attacking the Communist Partys philosophy, and even more, their tactics, which are those of the fifth column, and are dishonest, Reagan nonetheless didnt want the country to abandon democracy to fight reds: I never as a citizen want to see our country become urged, by either fear or resentment of this group, that we ever compromise with any of our democratic principles through that fear or resentment. I still think that democracy can do it.

Reagans adherence to civil liberties was all the more remarkable considering his run-ins with Hollywood communists during a 1945-46 labor strike in Hollywooda strike militantly and violently organized against studios by communists. As a member of the Independent Citizens Committee of the Arts and Sciences and Professions (ICCASP), a liberal group that helped re-elect FDR for a fourth term, Reagan became uncomfortably aware that over 70 percent of the supposedly liberal membership were hard-line Stalinists.

Along with other anti-communist liberals in the organization, among then actress Olivia De Havilland, Reagan tested the waters by introducing a resolution condemning communism as well as fascism and pledging support to the free enterprise system. Hardline communists denounced Reagan as a fascist and the actor later received a phone call from someone threatening to throw acid in his face. Outnumbered, and unable to convince communist members to allow the resolution to be put to a vote among the membership, Reagan and other liberals, including FDRs son James Roosevelt, resigned.

After testifying before HUAC in 1947, Reagan joined others to try to minimize the effects of the blacklist in a group called The Motion Picture Industry Council. In the words of liberal screenwriter and founding member Philip Dunne, the purpose of the group was to limit the scope of the blacklist, get the blacklisted back to work, and defend those who were falsely accused of communist beliefs.

But such nuance regarding Reagan does not fit into liberal narratives. Because Reagan was anticommunist, even while a Democrat, he has to be a red-baiter trying to deny those such as Trumbo employment.

Here is the original post:
Ronald Reagan: Use Democracy To Fight Hollywood Communism - The Liberty Conservative

Owaisi and Togadia embrace communism as their religion for getting absolute freedom of speech – Firstpost (satire)

Recently, during the protests at Ramjas college and the Azaadi agitation which took place last year at JNU, there has been a continuous demand that an absolute freedom of speech shall prevail in the country without any reasonable restrictions. By observing Umar Khalid duringhis statements and protests, and how he got away without any charges wearing a garb of communism and free speech, Praveen Togadia and Akhbarudin Owaisi seem to have been very impressed with the JNU student.

A close aide of Owaisi told faking news, We are in talks with the liberal left think tanks, AISA, CPI(M) leaders and some JNU Students who will help us embrace this ideology as our new religion so that we are able to transform a hate speech into free speech. Similarly, Togadias spokesperson too said, By embracing communism and with the help of these people, we can help ourselves with an image makeover and transform our communal speeches into secular ones.

Also, the reason as to why Owaisi and Togadia got too carried away and emotional with the whole incident is that the fight of the left liberal brigade and AISA Students shall only be restricted tothe ultra nationalists or the ideology of jingoistic nationalism. Free religious hate speeches shall be welcomed by them with open arms. Hence it implies, that by embracing communism under the guidance of the left liberals and the intellectual elite, it would be easy to provide a breeding ground to the radical religious elements across India and would help them propagate their radical but free ideas and agendas.

Fascinated by the whole narrative itself, some separatist elements like the ones in Kashmir, remaining few khalistanis and the ones in north-easttoo have been driven by the idea and are considering to follow the footsteps of the two religious leaders in order to propagate their ideas.

Continue reading here:
Owaisi and Togadia embrace communism as their religion for getting absolute freedom of speech - Firstpost (satire)

Communists still top security threat Esperon – Philippine Star

DAVAO CITY , Philippines The communists are still the countrys top security threat, according to National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon Jr.

It is communism that is the number one threat. Because the communists here want to change the way of life of the Filipinos. They want to force their way even if they are outdated already, Esperon said yesterday.

The communists have been waging an insurgency since 1968 which the military said has claimed 30,000 lives to overthrow the government.

Aside from the communists, Esperon added the problem of illegal drugs, extremism, terrorism, corruption, secessionism and even the alleged destabilization plots, as among the other threats the country currently faces.

Illegal drugs because it is destroying the very fiber of our society, the very core, our families. Illegal drugs wastes so much of our resources, our Filipino values, our youth, he said.

Esperon stressed the brand of communism the leftist groups are pushing is an old issue.

Headlines ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1

The problem with these communists is that they are still talking about imperialism when we are no longer a colony. They are talking about feudalism and fascism, when we are not fascists. I think the communists should also update themselves on what they really want, he said.

He said even China, which is the leading communist country in the world, has opened up to foreign markets and to the idea of capitalism.

Esperon however said that even if communists pose the biggest national security threat, there are political solutions to the problem.

He cited President Dutertes efforts to achieve lasting peace and unite the country under one flag.

Esperon mentioned in particular the resumption of peace talks with the Communist Party of the Philippines-New Peoples Army-National Democratic Front (CPP-NPA-NDF).

Duterte restarted peace talks with the communist rebels that had been on and off for 30 years.

The two sides separately declared ceasefires in August, and the informal arrangement largely held as they continued discussions in Rome last month.

The communists terminated their self-declared truce after accusing the government of failing to release all political prisoners and encroaching on rebel-held areas.

Duterte replied by scuttling the peace talks and declaring an all out war against the communist rebels.

During his visit to Camp Teodulfo Bautista in Jolo, Sulu last Friday, Duterte reminded the troops to expect an ambush anytime from the rebels.

Do not just leave your camps to stroll around, Duterte told the troops.

We have a resurgence of assassinations, Sparrows many soldiers have died. Expect an ambush anytime, Duterte said, referring to the notorious special partisan unit of NPA hit men.

The President advised soldiers to go out in groups and avoid being complacent about their safety. With Alexis Romero

Visit link:
Communists still top security threat Esperon - Philippine Star

From Defeating Communism to Embracing Totalitarianism – The Good Men Project (blog)

In the 1980s conservatives had their champion. The man that would lead them to glory, after years of feeling ignored. After the perceived weakness of President Carter over the previous four years, a new man was in charge. The United States wouldnt be pushed around anymore.

His name was Ronald Reagan, his mission; destroy communism.

With the Soviet Union already in a state of decline economically and militarily, their influence was dwindling but still in place. Upon the death of Leonid Brezhnev in 1982, and two forgettable leaders who died quickly after taking office in between, Mikhail Gorbachev became the new General Secretary in March of 1985.

Gorbachev and Reagan had a relationship that developed into a vision of change..

Whether it was because the Soviet Unions decline was unstoppable or the way Reagan outshined and embarrassed the General Secretary at the Reykjavik summit, many of Gorbachevs citizens considered him weak. This perceived weakness was a driving force to the August 1991 coup dtat by Soviet military hardliners. Even though the coup was put down in a matter of days and Gorbachev returned to power, the event marked the final piece of destabilization and the end of the USSR.

Gorbachev and Reagan had a relationship that developed into a vision of change. Reagan saw the dangers in communism and the need to wipe it from the face of the earth. However, he knew to do it militarily was a no win situation for the two nations and the world as a whole. Gorbachev to his credit became the reformer that the Soviet people needed, whether they were all aware of it or not.

Growing up in the 80s I remember the change in atmosphere. From the belief that the Soviets were our mortal enemies and ready to nuke us at any moment, to eventually Americans developing admiration for the Soviet leader and having a desire to see him succeed in bringing Russia to the new century. From enemies to virtual allies in a little over a decade. The relationship was still fragile but at least it was becoming friendlier.

Over the next two decades, both nations stayed in a constant state of change and to an extent, unrest. In the early 2000s Vladimir Putin began to cement himself as the sole ruler of the Russian government. His tactics, policies, beliefs, and words all reminded the world of an old-school Soviet militant. At home, we faced unending foreign war, near economic collapse, and a nation divided both politically and socially.

The election of President Obama in 2008 was a moment that marked a change in America. How we dealt with other countries, allies and adversaries alike. His foreign policy was measured and constrained, to a fault in the eyes of many. His cautiousness was often mistaken for weakness. His understanding that US policy often had serious adverse effects on other nations made many call him anti-American. Coupled with the fact the wars he had been handed werent traditional military actions and an economy in an uncontrollable nose dive, gave many the excuse to blame all the ills they faced on him.

Many who in the past had been solid communist haters, were now saying positive things about Putin. He was a better leader; he knows more; he doesnt mess around, were all part of the new narrative. Mostly these comments were derived from their hatred for Obama, but over time they began to believe them. What they were really saying is that they wanted a hardline authoritarian to lead the US. They wanted someone who would use the military as his foreign policy arm. They liked the idea of someone who crushed his opposition at home so easily and viciously.

They were craving a ruler, someone that would single-handedly make all their problems disappear. Someone who would tell them that the problems they faced were not of their own accord but because of outside influence. Desperately needing validation for their beliefs and biases. Wanting to be able to shed responsibility for their failures, while at the same time denyingany hatred in their hearts.

Enter 2016.

In many ways, history has repeated itself with the election of President Trump. While Reagan denied a second Carter term; Trump, in the eyes of many, halted a potential Obama third term. The policies and approach of Hillary Clinton were expected to be similar to that of Obamas. Reagan came in on a wave of revived patriotism and an America first message. While focusing on the threats to our way of life from outside forces and the lack of intestinal fortitude of the current administration, real or imagined, to do anything to halt it. For Reagan, it was Iran and the Soviets, for Trump its Muslims and the Mexico.

From building a border wall to destroying ISIS in 30 days, Donald Trump was saying exactly what many needed so desperately to hear.

From building a border wall to destroying ISIS in 30 days, Donald Trump was saying exactly what many needed so desperately to hear. It didnt matter if any of the things he said or promised were feasible, it was about his willingness to say them. Even if he didnt accomplish any of them, they believed he was going to try to do all of them. Their champion had arrived.

This champion was different than Reagan though. Where Reagan despised the philosophy of the Soviet, Trump seemed to understand it differently, going as far as to say that Putin was a far better leader than Obama. Now VP Mike Pence said at the time in defense of Trumps remarks that I think its inarguable that Vladimir Putin has been a stronger leader in his country than Barack Obama has been in this country.

With Trumps continuous war with the media and the seemingly unending parade of questionable Russian ties to administration officials, you would think that conservatives would begin to question their champion. That isnt whats happening at all if anything they are becoming more solidified in their support.

As I look at this country I grew up in; I must begin to question what the heck is going on. Why are we suddenly ok with someone, whom conservative pundit Bill OReilly calls a killer, and Senate Majority Leader McConnell calls a thug, being intimately involved with the process and function of our government? How did we go from a nation that elects a man like Reagan who hated every tenet of communism to electing someone from the same party who admires a leader like Putin? The same Putin that holds dear so many cold war values.

This nations acceptance to be ruled is shocking.

This nations acceptance to be ruled is shocking. The desire to have personal responsibility replaced with government control is sickening. I am immediately reminded of a quote from Reagan himself that I think addresses what we are going through, Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didnt pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same. In the almost 30 years since he left office, America has indeed changed.

My hope is that my more conservative friends will come to their senses and understand the actual threat we face. That they will demand accountability from our elected leaders, no matter who they are. I want my liberal friends to do the same. We have to stop looking at the person and the party and focus on the policy. Quit just trying to win and start trying to understand the other side.

If not the next overlord we choose will simply bring more destruction to the American experiment. Remember the words of Ben Franklin we will only have this republic if you can keep it.

Photo:Getty Images

I am the Politics Editor for The Good Men Project. I am a married father of three boys that keep me on my toes. We are transplants to Surprise Arizona, originally from the deep south. I was raised in the Birmingham Alabama area and have a love for all things southern, especially if they are fried! When I'm not writing or chasing kids, I am an avid sports nut, with an unhealthy love for the Alabama Crimson Tide and the Green Bay Packers. I put off writing for entirely too long, so I finally decided to put my words out in public with the hope that somewhere, someone may be encouraged or comforted by them. You can find me on Twitter or on Facebook

The rest is here:
From Defeating Communism to Embracing Totalitarianism - The Good Men Project (blog)