Archive for the ‘Communism’ Category

The Political Class’s Attacks On TikTok Ultimately Insult the American People – RealClearMarkets

Remember in the 70s and 80s when grandstanding politicians attacked Soviet businesses bent on meeting the needs of American customers in order to spy on them? Neither can I. With good reason.

Communism is an ideology of force rooted in the Marxian notion of from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. Translated, there are no globally-beloved businesses in communist countries.

Conservatives seemed to understand this best when the Soviet Union still existed. Figure that Ronald Reagan ran for president on the correct notion that government was arrogating to itself way too much of the fruits of American production, and the latter proved a deterrent to production. Reagans analysis of what kept the U.S. down in a relative sense was what kept the U.S.S.R. down in a near total sense, and by extension, its what had Reagan confident that the U.S.S.R.s days were numbered.

Which is why the evolution of modern conservatism is at times so disappointing. Conservatives of old knew that communism was the biggest reason the Soviets werent starting businesses that had even a faint hope of meeting the needs of the American people.

The communism that rendered the Soviet Union economically irrelevant is what should have the American political class confident today that China is many things, but communist isnt one of them. The happy fact that Chinese companies like TikTok so expertly meet the needs of the global population is all the evidence we need that China is no longer communist. If it were, there would be no active House committees focused on alerting Americans to the perils of a rising China.

Communist countries are defined by relentless drudgery, period. Yet the people of China presently represent the biggest non-U.S. market for American plenty in the world. That they do signals an impressive level of production there born of rising economic freedom. As Americans we know this intuitively based on when communism so cruelly infected so much of the world. When it did, Americans had billions fewer customers to meet the needs of.

Worse, Americans had billions fewer individuals around the world meeting their needs. Since communism penalizes production almost in total, theres logically very little production to export. And we Americans suffered this sad truth. Again, basic economics. The division of labor is the path to staggering leaps in terms of productivity as individual hands get to migrate to the specialized work that most elevates their unique genius.

Put another way, the perils of a rising China are anything but. If the Chinese were really our enemies, they would do as the Soviets did and produce nothing. The latter was the certain path to a weaker United States, as was Chinas lack of production when it was actually communist. When the Chinese werent producing, Americans were poorer and they were simply because something on the order of a billion Chinese people were not working alongside them. When were unable to divide up work with others, were not realizing our talents.

Please keep this in mind with TikTok top of mind. Its success is a sign of Chinas rapid move away from communism in concert with the rise of China as a market set to grow by leaps and bounds for American companies. And the more productive the Chinese become thanks to growing amounts of economic freedom, the more that Americans will realize their staggering economic potential.

All of which raises the question of why? Why in consideration of Chinas evident move away from communism are U.S. politicians attacking the obvious fruits of this move? That TikTok is capable of competing on the world stage means that the outlook for American companies can only improve. Competion is fuel. Yet TikTok is under attack by protectionist U.S. politicians in ways that can only hurt U.S. corporations. It's simple economics. Protectionism logically weakens those protected.

Which brings us to an arguably more troubling scenario: that the U.S. political class actually believes TikTok et al a threat to our national security. In the words of Rep. Michael McCaul, "The younger generation loves TikTok, but I don't think they appreciate the dangers. I call it the spy baloon in your phone." Yes, the victim play. An app might get us, it might cause Americans to embrace Chinas ways, including its alleged communist ways. If so, how insulting...to America.

Really, what a statement from alleged patriots about the U.S. that what we have is so weak and unworthy of regard that a bunch of Chinese intelligence flunkies can turn us. That Americans are so clueless and malleable. Were better than this. Harassing foreign competition is beneath us on its face, after which how shameful it is that U.S. politicians would insult us with their pretense that the Chinese can bring down the U.S. with an app.

Read the original:
The Political Class's Attacks On TikTok Ultimately Insult the American People - RealClearMarkets

‘Word for Word’: Persecution Watchdog Warns of Striking Parallels with Communism, ‘American Leftist’ Restrictions – CBN.com

An expert who tackles Christian persecution sounded the alarm this week on parallelshe sees between western nations tactics and crackdowns perpetuated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Bob Fu, president of ChinaAid, a group that monitors persecution, said similarities in the playbooks used by U.S. and China are striking, particularly when exploring how the West handled COVID-19 restrictions.

Listen to the latest episode of CBNs Quick Start podcast:

The similarities are very, very striking between the Chinese Communist way of persecution and the American leftist way of restriction and even discrimination, Futold Fox News. It is very shocking and horrible to see American societys transformation evolving from its constitutional basis.

The nonprofit leader, who became a Christian in the Chinese underground church and even went to prison for leading house churches before escaping in 1996, saidhe believesthe American left is increasingly turning to dictatorial tactics, refusing to allow diverse voices.

Fu reflected on Californias handling of the pandemic to illustrate one such example.

I saw the governor of California basically proscribe and order the church to shut down and say not only when they can worship, but how, hetold Fox News. The ways that he threatened to punish those churches and pastors sometimes were word-for-word exactly the same as what the CCP is using against the Chinese churches.

Read more of what Fu had to sayhere.

Fu isnt the first person to note purportedly similarities between the U.S. and repressive regimes.

North Korean defector-turned-U.S. citizen Yeonmi Park, who is out with a new book titled While Time Remains: A North Korean Defectors Search for Freedom in America, recently told CBNs Faithwire about patterns she sees developing in America dynamics that could threaten the freedoms held dear.

The mother of a young American son, Park said shes afraid for the nation she now calls home.

I was realizing that freedoms that I thought Americans had, it was like slipping away from all of us, she said, noting she worries America is in the beginning phase of becoming more like North Korea, particularly when it comes to tactics to divide as well as free speech restrictions.

America uses race to divide people, Park said. In North Korea, they use what our ancestors did to divide people. Even though youre the same people, same language, same skin colors, same genetics.

She added, Based on what my great-great-grandfather did, they determined if I have oppressor blood or oppressed blood.

Thus, based on familial ties, ones standing is decided, with Park likening this to some of what she sees happening in America today on the race front.

There is forever no redemption in that system, she said. So, collective guilt, collective punishment.

***As the number of voices facing big-tech censorship continues to grow, please sign up forFaithwires daily newsletterand download theCBN News app, to stay up-to-date with the latest news from a distinctly Christian perspective.***

Continued here:
'Word for Word': Persecution Watchdog Warns of Striking Parallels with Communism, 'American Leftist' Restrictions - CBN.com

The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis: McCarthyism … – Monthly Review

Monthly Review | The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis: McCarthyism, Communism, and the Myth of Academic FreedomNavigationReturn to Content

$26.00 $89.00

The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis tells the true tale of a mathematician who found himselfat the height of the McCarthy era taking an involuntary break from chalking equations to sit opposite a row of self-righteous anti-Communist congressmen. Counted among a brave group of people who confronted a system rapidly descending into fascism as they asserted the First Amendment before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), Davis was one of a small number of left wingers who served time for contempt of Congress.

In this fascinating and disturbing narrative, author Steve Batterson takes a deep dive into extant archival records generated by the FBI, HUAC, the University of Michigan, and repositories holding the papers of former Supreme Court justices. Focusing on the seemingly conflicting Supreme Court decisions on labor leader John Watkins and Vassar College Psychology instructor Lloyd Barenblatt, he examines the plights of six faculty and graduate students at the University of Michiganincluding three future members of the National Academy of Scienceswhose lifes work was impacted by the anticommunist actions of a wide range of personnel at the University of Michigan. In particular, he examines the role played in the trial by Felix Frankfurter, a longtime Associate Justice on the Supreme Court, close advisor of Franklin D. Roosevelt, and co-founder of the ACLU. In the process, Batterson exposes the ways that McCarthys righteous emissaries relied on all kinds of institutions in 1950s Americafrom Hollywood studios to universitiesto sabotage the careers of anyone with a trace of Red.

Carefully doneand good reading as well.Stephen Smale, UC-Berkeley mathematician, Fields Medalist (Nobel Prize for Mathematics)

At a moment when conservative forces are once more taking a sledgehammer to academic freedom, Steve Batterson tells the story of the intrepid and far-sighted H. Chandler Davis as it needs to be told.Calmly unpicking the tenacious fallacies used to rationalize the anticommunist purge of the 1950s, he provides a deeply researched and compulsively readable biography that is note-perfect for our time and full of surprising historical details.Alan Wald, H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professor Emeritus, University of Michigan, and author ofAmerican Night:The Literary Left in the Era of the Cold War

Steve Batterson is professor emeritus of mathematics and computer science at Emory University. He received his PhD in mathematics from Northwestern University in 1976, and soon embarked upon mathematical research at Emory, the Institute for Advanced Study, Boston University, and the University of California at Berkeley. In the 1990s he wrote a biography of the Fields Medal winner Stephen Smale, followed by two books and several articles on the history of mathematics.

Publication Date: 02/01/2024

Number of Pages: 200

Paperback ISBN: 978-1-68590-035-9

Cloth ISBN: 978-1-68590-036-6

eBook ISBN: 978-1-68590-037-3

{{{ data.variation.price_html }}}

{{{ data.variation.availability_html }}}

See more here:
The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis: McCarthyism ... - Monthly Review

Letter: Communism, it can start in schools | Opinion … – ECM Publishers

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

See original here:
Letter: Communism, it can start in schools | Opinion ... - ECM Publishers

Opinion: Fighting indoctrination with indoctrination – Des Moines Register

David Skidmore| Guest columnist

Poring over the bills that survived Iowa Legislatures March 3 funnel deadline, I came across House File 132, which immediately gave me a sense of dj vu. The Republican-sponsored bill would require both public and charter high schools across Iowa to offer a United States government course that would, in addition to covering electoral procedures and the U.S. Constitution, entail a comparative discussion of political ideologies, including communism and totalitarianism that conflict with the principles of freedom and democracy that were essential to the founding of the United States.

This bill follows a similar one signed into law in June 2021 by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis that requires high school government courses to include a comparative discussion of political ideologies, such as Communism and totalitarianism, that conflict with the principles of freedom and democracy essential to the founding principles of the United States. DeSantis followed up in May 2022 with a mandate that schools offer at least 45 minutes of instruction about the evils of communism on Floridas newly designated Victims of Communism Day, set for Nov. 7.

U.S. Sen. Rick Scott, a Florida Republican, recently introduced a bill in the U.S. House that would require schools nationwide to teach students the dangers of communism.

This sudden urgency to protect the precious minds of todays youth from the allures of communism whisked me back to my senior year of high school in 1976. I recall wiling away hours in the back of the class, counting down the days until graduation, in a required course dreaded by all seniors titled Americanism vs. Communism.

In 1961, following the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, the Florida Legislature passed a law requiring that all students take AVC, as it was universally called, to graduate. In addition to providing students with a greater appreciation of democratic processes, freedom under law, and the will to preserve that freedom, the law required that the course place particular emphasis upon the dangers of communism, the ways to fight communism, the evils of communism, the fallacies of communism, and the false doctrines of communism.

Initially, the State Department of Education used official reports of the House Committee on Un-American Activities and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoovers book "A Study of Communism" as texts. Instructors were forbidden from presenting communism in a favorable light. The course continued, in various forms, until the law was finally repealed in 1991, following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

One study of Floridas Americanism vs. Communism law refers to it as an effort to dispense an official ideology, mirroring the practices of the political systems the lawmakers intended to warn against.

Now we have been suddenly transported back a half century, which is puzzling. It is not as if the earlier precedent was a stunning success. One researcher interviewed faculty and students who taught or took AVC in Central Florida high schools in the mid-1960s. Students universally panned the course, considering it boring propaganda. I can certainly attest to this conclusion. I recall students with their heads on their desks, films showing red ink blots spreading across the globe to illustrate the communist threat and readings informing us that Karl Marx was a bad father. The teacher appeared to enjoy the course least of all.

Indeed, former instructors interviewed for the study generally disliked being forced to teach pre-cooked answers dictated by politicians rather than genuine social science. The bolder instructors sought to transcend the limitations of the required teaching materials by following established methods for teaching comparative government in the classroom, although this sometimes led to harassment in an environment where faculty were required to take loyalty oaths.

The irony of House File 132 is that it fails to recognize that communism and other forms of totalitarianism have failed in most places where they have been tried precisely because humans are generally averse to propaganda and indoctrination. AVC was a waste of precious class time and a distraction from the kind of education that serves as the real bulwark to closed and rigid ideologies: critical thinking and exposure to a diversity of ideas.

The retro-Cold War classrooms that the current crop of Republican legislators want to create as part of their broader culture war branding may prove good politics in the short run but will not serve any meaningful educational purpose. Perhaps that is the point.

David Skidmore is a professor of political science atDrake University.

Read the original post:
Opinion: Fighting indoctrination with indoctrination - Des Moines Register