Archive for the ‘Communism’ Category

As election looms, Trump adds to the long story of conspiracy theory in US politics – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

In 2016, University of Miami political scientist Joseph Uscinski tried to imagine a conspiracy theorist as president, someone sitting at the most powerful desk in the world, complete with the codes to a nuclear arsenal. By the time Uscinski put his thoughts in writing, Donald Trump was the front-runner in the Republican primary. Trump the candidate had already said refugees fleeing the Syrian civil war could bea secret terrorist army. Hed already claimed there was a link betweenautism and vaccines. And hed even hinted that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia might have been suffocated by a pillow. While Trump hadnt yet accused his opponents father of being connected to the JFK assassination, Uscinski had already got the idea: This isnt good.

Since his election, Trump has continued to plug conspiracy theories, claiming, for instance, that the 2020 presidential election is rigged and that his opponents are criminals. He has even dipped his toes into the murky waters of QAnonthe bizarre theory that prominent elites like Hillary Clinton not only run the world, but have also found the time to operate a Satan-worshiping pedophilia ring. Earlier this month, Trump retweeted an unhinged conspiracy theory about former Vice President Joe Biden baselessly asserted by an account linked to QAnon.

Trump, like no other president in recent memory, is a card-carrying conspiracy theorist. Theres no reason for people to act shocked, Uscinski said. Where the f have you been for 10 years?

But questions remain: Whats in it for a sitting president, the keeper of the flame of 231 years of American democracy, to signal-boost some of the worst bilge sloshing around the internet?

QAnon is not popular; until recently, it was barely known.

A recent Pew Research Center poll found that about 50 percent of the public has heard of the theory. While that figure is up from roughly 25 percent earlier in the year, among those whove heard of QAnon, three quarters view it negatively. In his surveys, Uscinski has found people rank QAnon in the low 20s on a 101-point scale of favorability, a poor showing.

Barring the possibility that Trump actually believes QAnons plotlinehes passed up big moments to disavow itUscinski points to a possible rationale for the presidents embrace of conspiracy theories.

QAnon believers are smack-dab in the middle of Trumps target constituency of conspiracy-minded people who dont like the establishment, Uscinski said. In 2016, Trump famously told the audience tuned into the Republican Convention in Cleveland, I alone can fix it. Trump is still running as an outsider facing off against a corrupt political class, this time as the incumbent.

What hes doing is continuing to reach out to these conspiracy-minded constituencies, Uscinski said. And even though QAnon might be relatively small, he feels like hes not going to pay a price for reaching out publicly.

Despite QAnons small following, political scientists like Uscinski think conspiracy theory belief is exceedingly common. Everyone, he said, believes in at least one.

Eric Oliver, a University of Chicago political scientist, has conducted public opinion surveys for the past 15 years on conspiracy theories. In the surveys, he asks people whether they believe in theories like the one about vapor trails behind airplanes being evidence of a secret government spraying campaign or another about the US Food and Drug Administration withholding knowledge about natural cures for cancer. About half the public believes in at least one of the six or seven theories he asks about, Oliver said.

That leads me to believe that that kind of conspiratorial ethic, that way of understanding or deciphering political information by using reference to a conspiracy theory, is pretty common, he said.

In a famous piece in Harpers Magazine, The Paranoid Style in American Politics, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Richard Hofstadter wrote in 1964 about how a sense of loss undergirds political conspiracy theory. Although Hofstadter said that the political style of mind that saw vast conspiracies everywhere wasnt necessarily right wing, he paid special attention to the rhetoric of the anti-communist right. The modern right wing, he wrote, believed America has been largely taken away from them and their kind.

Conspiracy theories often emanate from the losing side in political struggles. In one study, Uscinski and a colleague surveyed 120,000 published letters written to the editors of major newspapers dating back to at least the 1890s. When a Republican was in the White House, 16 percent of letters that promoted a conspiracy theory focused on right-wing conspiracies. When a Democrat was in power, that figure dropped to 5 percent. The numbers were essentially reversed when it came to letters alleging a left-wing conspiracy. The general pattern, Uscinski wrote in his 2016 article, is that the out-of-power party accuses the in-power party of conspiring.

For much of his term, however, Trump and his side have been the winners on the political battlefield. Hes the sitting president, after all, and Republicans have controlled the Senate for Trumps entire term and the House of Representatives for half of it.

Despite this strong political position, Trump often paints a grim picture for his supporters.

As we meet here tonight, there is a growing danger that threatens every blessing our ancestors fought so hard for, he told a crowd at a July 4th celebration. Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children.

In Trumps telling, his supporters are under threatat constant risk of losing a great deal. A left-wing cultural revolution had overtaken the countrys schools, the news media, and the summers racial justice protest marches. If you do not speak its language, perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow its commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted, and punished.

Conspiracy theories have cast a shadow over American politics, since almost the beginning, Ray Smock, a former historian for the US House of Representatives, said. In the middle of the 19th Century, for instance, the American Party, known for its ferocious xenophobia and for its anti-Catholic conspiracy theories, once held more than 100 seats in Congress. The party sprung from the members of secretive nativist organizations who were known for saying they know nothing whenever they were asked about their groups.

A hundred years later, the countrygrappling with the advent of a nuclear weapons arms race with the Soviet Unionwas in the throes of Cold War anti-communist hysteria, an era partly personified by Sen. Joseph McCarthy, a Wisconsin Republican. McCarthy rose to fame after a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia, in 1950 in which he claimed to have the names of 205 communists in the US State Department. The conspiracy theory about communist infiltration touched a nerve with an anxious public.

We were entering the nuclear age; 1945 was the first time anybody had heard of an atomic weapon, Smock said. By 1950, everybody was scared to death that these things could annihilate the worldand the Soviet Union had them.

McCarthy, of course, became known for the congressional hearings he staged in order to ferret out supposed communists. There in fact were communists in government, but not in the kind of numbers McCarthy touted, Smock said. He never discovered any communists in government, even though there probably were some. But he had created this hysterical movement that did damage lives.

McCarthy as a political phenomenon didnt last long. After he tried to expose communism in the military, the public turned on the senator. He died in 1957. But the hysteria he helped fuel, in part through conspiracy theories, lived on.

I would argue that McCarthy and many others were responsible for a great influence, an unfortunate influence, Smock said. The paranoia became so pervasive you could not hardly run for office unless you had expressed anti-communist views. In those days, if you even suggested that well maybe the Soviet Union had its good points or maybe we shouldnt be so worried about the Soviet Union, you were called a comsymp, a communist sympathizer.

The fear of communism affected both parties. President Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat, bought into the Domino Theory that if we didnt fight the communists in Asia wed be fighting them in California. Smock said. The whole Vietnam era is sort of the ultimate expression of anti-communist fear.

Its hard to say the Red Scare period was marked by a particular prevalence of conspiracy theory belief. Historical accounts of the McCarthy era or of other conspiratorial times are episodic snapshots, Uscinski said, and not surveys that measure how public opinion changes over time. I dont think that the 50s were some special time for this, in general, he said

In his 2016 article, Uscinksi wrote that conspiracy theories are often benign and their targets usually powerful and well protected. But conspiracy narratives can become more dangerous, the political scientist wrote, when the government employs them against the vulnerable. While the prevalence of conspiracy theory belief isnt on a dramatic upswing, thats not a reason to shrug our shoulders and move on.

Beliefs drive actions, Uscinski said. And if beliefs are not tethered to our shared reality, the actions can be very dangerous. People who believe vaccines are a scam probably wont get vaccinated, potentially fueling outbreaks of infectious diseases. People who think immigrants are part of a murderous plot might take some kind of action against them.

Trump is exploiting the same persistent level of conspiracy theory belief that McCarthy did before him, Uscinksi said: Its there for anyone who wants to grab it.

Most Republicans and Democrats dont, he said. Trump, of course, isnt like most Republicans or Democrats.

See more here:
As election looms, Trump adds to the long story of conspiracy theory in US politics - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

With high turnouts, Asian Americans in NC poised to impact the 2020 election – The Fayetteville Observer

The fastest growing racial group in the state is looking to flex its political might as both major parties seek their allegiances this election.

The billboard can be seen by driverspassing through Alamance County along Interstate 40. One moment, it flashes NC Chinese Americans for Biden, and then, on the same electronic screen, the blue background turns red and the text becomes Chinese Americans for Trump 2020."

The billboards were paid for by two local groups of Chinese Americans and exemplify the complexities of North Carolinas Asian-American electorate. Members of this diverse and emergent voting bloc tend to have fewer allegiances to political parties, making them the focus of both major parties.

I think for the 2020 election, theres this understanding that because (Asian American and Pacific Islanders) are generally more independent and infrequent voters at times, theyre persuadable, and so its worth making the effort to reach out to this community, said Chavi Khanna Koneru, executive director of North Carolina Asian Americans Together (NCAAT), a Raleigh-based advocacy group.

This fall, as the two presidential campaigns try to tilt this toss-up state their way, Asian Americans in North Carolina have embraced early voting and canvassing, aware of their growing influence.

The engagement level is really, really high this year, said Ya Liu, a Chinese American who serves on theCary Town Council. Not only are the campaigns paying more attention but within the Chinese communities, people talk about politics all the time. I think the stakes are really high.

More: Split-ticket voters may be endangered, but they could still sway North Carolina races

US Senate race in NC: Can Tillis come from behind and beat Cunningham?

Asian Americans areNorth Carolinas fastest-growing racial group, with prominent Chinese, Indian, Vietnamese, Korean, and Filipino communities concentrated around Greensboro, Charlotteand the Triangle Area.

State Board of Election data shows 103,000 registered voters identify as Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI), though some believe the number is higher, as some voters report their race or may mistakenly register as American Indian instead of Asian American Indians.

Seeking a fuller count of the electorate, Liu teamed up with a data scientist and a lawyer totrawl through the states raw voter data and identify Asian Americans by their names. According to their model, there are 180,000 registered Asian American voters in North Carolina, and 92,549have already voted early. This would be a 51.4% turnout, above the statewide turnout rateas of Oct. 28. Liu

This week, NCAAT released one of the first pollsto specifically gauged the attitudes of AAPI voters in North Carolina. Conducted in partnership with the U.S. Immigration Policy Center, the poll found 64% of AAPI voters were more determined to vote this year than in previous elections.

More than one in five said either they or their families had faced discrimination during the pandemic. Some believe President Trumps references to coronavirus as the Chinese virus and Kung Flu will propel more Asian Americans to the polls in protest.

Its really upsetting, Liu, a Democrat, said.

Polls indicate Asian American voters lean towards Biden this election, though by margins narrower than some other minority groups.

According to the national 2020 Asian American Voter Survey, 54% of respondents said theyd vote for Biden while 30% said theyd vote for Trump. Indian Americans, who are the largest group within the AAPIelectorate in North Carolina, supported Biden the most (66%) while Vietnamese Americans were the lone Asian American group to favor Trump over Biden, 48% to 36%. Vietnam is a communist country, and many Vietnamese Americans perceive the GOP as being tougher on communism.

The Vietnamese people are originally refugees because of the Communists, said Amy Nguyen, president of the Vietnamese Association of Charlotte. So, they came here and dont want to have our history from Vietnam repeated.

Like Nguyen, AAPIcommunity leaders say early voting has been popular, especially for groups that dont always have the strongest turnout.

Asian American voters: Policies that motivate the growing electorate

Asian Americans are the fastest growing electorate in the country. USA TODAY's States of America discusses what motivates them in elections.

In past elections, Khanna Koneru, who is Indian American, said shes found her community to be difficult to politically energize. Yet this year, shes seen a spike in involvement, buoyed in part by Kamala Harris, daughter of an Indian American, running as the Democratic nominee for vice president.

I think it makes a huge difference seeing any presidential candidate pick a person of Asian American, particularly of Indian American descent, and a woman as a running mate, is a powerful acknowledgment of our community, Konerusaid.

More: Is Biden bringing Black voters back to the polls? The answer could decide who wins NC

Campaigning for AAPI voters, the Trump campaign has hosted 100 AAPI-centered events across the state, with some held in Mandarin and Vietnamese.

Asian Pacific Americans for Trump are energized and inspired by the policies that President Trump has put in place to help their communities," said Trump campaign spokeswoman Kara Caldwell.

AAPI voters are also among the 22 constituencies the Biden campaign has identified as crucial for winning the state. While the campaign has scaled back in-person rallies due to the pandemic, its hosted virtual tours featuring AAPI politicians and celebrities.

Though the presidential race grabs the most attention, Liu said several less prominent races featuring AAPIcandidates have fueled higher turnout. In 2015, North Carolina elected its first Asian-American to the state senate, Sen. Jay Chaudhuri (D-Wake), and have since seen more AAPIpoliticians in the General Assembly and in city government. Ronnie Chatterji, an Indian American, is on the ballot this year for state treasurer.

This election cycle, Liu started the Chinese American Voter Alliance whichsent out 17,000 postcards in both English and Mandarin encouraging residents to vote for Democrats, while NCAAT in Actionhas distributed almost nine times as many mailers.

All of this happened with the last 10 years, Liu said. The population is growing and is eager to have representation.

While Liu recognizes AAPIs expanding political presence, she still feels the electorate could get more respect from the media, politicians, and the state board of elections which doesnt include a separate AAPI categoryon its main weekly voter registration reportor in its main daily early voting snapshot.

The Asian story in politics is such an untold story, she said. In North Carolina, this electorate is growing. And its going to be becoming more powerful.

Brian Gordon is a statewide reporter with the USA Today Networkin North Carolina. Reach him at bgordon@gannett.com or on Twitter @briansamuel92.

Read the rest here:
With high turnouts, Asian Americans in NC poised to impact the 2020 election - The Fayetteville Observer

Letter: Learn from examples of socialism’s dangers | Letters to the Editor – Reading Eagle

Editor:

Two excellent letters regarding Cuba were published recently. When Fidel Castro took power in 1959, he announced: This is not a dictatorship. We are never going to use force, because we belong to the people. Moreover, the day that the people do not want us, we shall leave. As soon as possible I will take the rifles off the streets. There are no more enemies, there is no longer anything to fight against. That signaled an end to private ownership of firearms in Cuba.

How has that worked out for the Cuban people for the last 61 years. Castro started out as a socialist freedom fighter, then he became a communist.

Think hard and long about voting in politicians with a socialist agenda. It always looks good on paper but never works.

Remember all of our veterans who fought against socialism and communism, some giving the ultimate sacrifice so that we can enjoy the freedoms we have afforded to us by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Why do you think people flee the oppression of socialism and communism and come to this country?

Robert Lee Horst

Robeson Township

View post:
Letter: Learn from examples of socialism's dangers | Letters to the Editor - Reading Eagle

Leninism without the working class? The missing subject in Malm’s ecological revolution – Open Democracy

Remarkably, Malm discusses factory takeovers without bringing workers in. Oil companies indeed need to be nationalized, as he asserts, and their resources turned into carbon capture facilities, machines, and personnel. When capital does anything to approximate the carbon capture which scientists argue is required at a global level, it circulates the carbon back into the atmosphere. Not selling it would not be profitable, Malm demonstrates: businesses will not produce something they would afterwards have to sink into the ground. Only the state can sink carbon into the ground globally. However, the book does not include one mention of organizing or mobilizing the workers of these companies to carry out the necessary nationalizations. It appears that we are burdened with the nationalization. But who is going to run these companies after we nationalize them?

Ironically, Malm introduces the section where he discusses oil nationalization with an anti-bureaucracy, pro-democracy quote from Lenin, yet comes to rely so much on the state as his prose unfolds. Without any articulation of the social actors who could take on nationalization processes, the talk of democracy will be just talk. It might be objected that workers are so complicit in pollutant capitalism that they cant be counted on. But negating that option goes nowhere towards nailing down an effective social replacement.

Then, there is the problem of the winter palace itself. Grabbing control of a second rate empire granted the Bolsheviks the chance to start a socialist experiment on a huge scale. But they knew everything would go to ruin if their institutions did not spread beyond Russia. Malm is incautiously sanguine that a revolutionary takeover might not produce similar bottlenecks today. But he is unspecific regarding the international form war communism will assume.

The eco-revolution is either global or it is nothing, but how do you accomplish global war communism in a world of a few imperial powers, perhaps a dozen effective nation-states, and many state-like yet ineffective entities? How many of these would you have to storm to even initiate a global process? There can be no immediate answer to this question, but it has to be confronted. And confront similar questions Lenin did, even if without any resolution.

In sum, as we approach the end of Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency, the proposed strategy starts to look less and less like Lenins historical practice. One might say, Well, it is after all the twenty-first century. How could it resemble Lenins? However, Malms strategy does vaguely resemble other twentieth (or even nineteenth) century revolutionaries, their names surfacing as he wraps up the book, and raising some troubling questions.

The more Malm quotes Lenin, the deeper the problem becomes. On pages 150-154, he repeatedly reminds us of Lenins quote regarding emergencies: we should act today, or even this very night. There is an issue with the time horizons of this section. Tonight? Metaphorically or really? What would happen if a band of ecological activists stormed a core capitalist state next week? Probably, not much would change. It would quickly be neutralized or get stuck in Trumps famous swamp.

Taking over the state without involving organized workers is a dead-end. We of course cannot wait for the emergence of soviets or similar structures, where workers organize themselves and prepare a more democratic basis for storming the proverbial winter palace. But we can build cadres that will give them direction when such self-organizations begin to form. However, that will not be achieved through Luxemburgism, Blanquism, or Guevarism the three historical references that Malm quickly throws into the mix at the very end of the book, without seriously exploring them. Seeing them so hastily invoked acts as a warning sign, since the sense of emergency in the absence of an organized working class and its cadres has so frequently led to self-defeating spontaneism and adventurism.

For an effective eco-Leninism, these three far left strategies need to be differentiated and handled with care. The first, I argue, should be seen as an ally. We need Rosa Luxemburgs spirit and some of her mobilizing techniques. But they would not be sufficient without mass organization led by cadres. Luxemburg held deep objections to Lenins organizational and strategic methods. Nevertheless, effective organization that respects the autonomy of its component parts requires the absorption of Luxemburgism into Leninism.

The second far left option should always be rejected. Blanquism is mostly associated with top-down putschism. When it involves bottom-up action, that comes through professional revolutionaries electrifying the masses via provocative actions. Lenins critique of Blanquis professional revolutionary was directed at precisely that reliance on provocation and top-down action. The Bolsheviks organized and mobilized through (mostly) conscious debate, example-setting, offering concrete solutions to concrete problems, and education. Not through provocation.

As for the third option many circumstances call for a Guevarist response (action, including violent action, by highly select cells). But it cant constitute the backbone of an ecological revolution either. When cell action backfires, cadres, militants, activists, and communities must have a theoretically equipped organization to fall back on: an organization that can help them make sense of what went wrong and figure out what to do next.

Without the necessary cadres, any call that we should act this very night can only lead to the dead end strategies above. A more realistic timespan to lay the basis of a sustainable ecosocialism is at least five to ten years, the time it took Lenin to build his cadres. It might seem as if it can be done faster under todays relatively more democratic and virtually connected conditions. But the global scale of organization needed will slow us down. Speculation aside, there are countless ecosocialist groupings throughout the world that need to be melded into a vanguard. That vanguard has to include workers from companies most key to an ecological revolution (or, whatever the social equivalent of workers might be). And one thing is for certain: these cadres will not be constituted overnight.

When Lenin wrote we have to act this very night, it was the autumn of 1917. He was speaking to people already in the middle of a revolution. That call came after 10+ years of organizing, and months of strategizing through the soviet landscapes of Petrograd and Moscow. It was a tactical, not a strategic call though Lenin infamously lacked a working differentiation between the two, and it fell to Trotsky to link them, and decisively march on the Winter Palace.

If we dont carefully balance a mass strategy with timely tactics, a too heavy recourse to left-communism could follow. Such an unfortunate turn of the movement could lead to decades of dispersion, demobilization, and demoralization, as it did in the United States after the 1960s, when, let us not forget, many of those spearheading American left-communism called themselves Leninists. In the case of todays ecological movement, a decade of demoralization would be fatal.

See the rest here:
Leninism without the working class? The missing subject in Malm's ecological revolution - Open Democracy

Is today more reminiscent of the 1930s than 1960s? | BrandeisNOW – Brandeis University

Communists protest in New York City in 1932.

By Paul JankowskiOct. 26, 2020

In the run-up to the presidential election, BrandeisNOW asked faculty to provide analysis and insight into some of the most pressing issues facing the country.PaulJankowski is the Raymond Ginger Professor of History and author of All Against All: The Long Winter of 1933 and the Origins of the Second World War.

Last spring, the protests that followed the killing on camera of George Floyd focused attention yet again in the United States on its chronic and structural racial inequalities.

COVID-19 had already done so. Its incidence, like that of unemployment, poverty and any number of social ills, fell heavily on African Americans, among other people of color. So too did the burden of the economic lockdown imposed to contain the spread of the virus.

Very quickly, the American moment of triple crisis, when discrimination, disease and deprivation divulged their complicity and their kinship, became a global moment as well.

Around the world, in cities just as multiracial as those in America -- in Birmingham, Auckland, Rio de Janeiro and others -- protesters took to the streets chanting the name of George Floyd in anger not at the inequalities of American society but at the racial stratification in their own.

The search for precedents, like that for origins, is always hazardous.

For a while, the unrest of 2020 revived memories of 1968. But the parallel is flawed. Neither urban insurrection nor generational revolt marks the daily and nocturnal marches of 2020. They are sui generis.

The protests appear to tear down the walls between nations. Yet meanwhile global fragmentation is deepening. Kindred grievances are erupting just as nations are turning their backs on one another.

In this sense the apt parallel is with the 1930s.

With its trade wars, populist or fascist dictatorships, crumbling democracies and deepening gloom, that decade has commanded a morbid fascination at least since the financial crash of 2008.

The parallels between then and now can be shaky, but the most valid among them is also the least noticed the inward turn among nations, as they pull out of multilateral agreements, raise tariffs, threaten neighbors or close borders. Who has time for the outer world or supranational causes?

Such causes abounded in the early 1930s. Pacifism was one. The disarmament conference that opened in Geneva in 1932 attracted petitions and delegations from organizations representing some 200 million people. World government was another.

Communism, a new, poorly understood alternative to a capitalist system blamed for the global depression, was yet another. The great light in the east brought pilgrims from far and wide to Moscow, and in New York, the comrades took leave of each other with the hopeful words, Meet me on the barricades.

But transnational enthusiasms were no match for their rivals. The call of nationalism soon sounded everywhere, expansionist here, isolationist there, sometimes derided as beggar-thy-neighbor or every man for himself but widely heard by multitudes of followers.

In the United States, the turmoil beyond the shores hardly troubled the candidates or voters in the elections of 1932 and 1936.

An aversion to foreign distractions brought the curtain down on transnational causes of any kind. Increasingly, pacifism shed internationalism for isolationist trappings.

In the elections of 2020, talk of a world descending into chaos has once again vanished from the national discussion, just as race, the planetary environment and other global causes of the day seemed poised to bring it back. Will it ever return?

Visit link:
Is today more reminiscent of the 1930s than 1960s? | BrandeisNOW - Brandeis University