Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

FX tackles the "9/11 of the culture wars" with trailer for Janet Jackson doc Malfunction – The A.V. Club

Janet Jackson, etc. in 2004Photo: JEFF HAYNES/AFP via Getty Images

The last few years have seen a persistentand welcomere-evaluation of the way the media and the wider world treated the female pop stars of the 1990s and 2000s. (I.e., the realization that pretty much every aspect of said treatment was shot through with misogyny on a frankly staggering number of levels.)

Nowon what is also, coincidentally or not, the same date as the end of one of the enduring symbols of that period, the conservatorship of Britney SpearsFX has released a trailer for a new documentary tackling another milestone in our collective crappy cultural treatment of women superstars: Malfunction: The Dressing Down Of Janet Jackson.

In case the title didnt somehow give it away, the New York Times-produced doc is centered on the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show, during which Justin Timberlake ripped off part of Janet Jacksons costume, briefly exposing her body to camerasan event for which the vast majority of blame, outrage, and general nation-wide freaking out was somehow assigned to Jackson.

And while the documentary talking heads might be going a bit overboard by describing the wardrobe malfunction as the 9/11 of the culture wars, that second or so of footage has undeniably been hugely influential on the world that followed. (This is where we note the standard anecdote that the foundation of YouTube was at least partially inspired by co-founder Jawed Kawims inability to find an online copy of the clip.)

Malfunction is being directed by Jodi Gomes, who previously filmed Jacksons brothers Jermaine, Jackie, Marlon, and Tito for A&Es docuseries The Jacksons, which aired six months after Michael Jacksons death. Her most recent film was One Child Left Behind, a documentary about the Atlanta Public Schools testing scandal from the late 2000s.

It doesnt look, from the trailer, like either Timberlake or Janet Jackson were involved in the production of Malfunction, although a press release does note that it features new reporting from The Times, which also produced both Framing Britney Spears,and follow-up Controlling Britney Spears.

G/O Media may get a commission

Malfunction debuts on November 19 on FX.

Go here to see the original:
FX tackles the "9/11 of the culture wars" with trailer for Janet Jackson doc Malfunction - The A.V. Club

In Texas and beyond, conservatives take culture wars to classrooms – FRANCE 24

Issued on: 08/11/2021 - 03:34Modified: 08/11/2021 - 03:32

Houston (AFP) Conservatives in Texas and several other states have declared war on the teaching of books aimed at sensitizing students to racism and gender identity issues, saying they wrongly inflict feelings of guilt on white and non-LGBTQ students.

In one direct result of the campaign, a school district west of Houston last month temporarily withdrew copies of a book that explains the unintentional "micro-aggressions" an African-American child suffers because of the color of his or her skin.

"New Kid" by Jerry Craft is just one of 850 books being examined by a Texas legislative committee examining how books used in the schools deal with institutional racism and sexism.

Committee head Matt Krause has asked every school district in the state to send him a list cataloging how many of each of the books they possess, where they are located and how much they spent for them.

Divisive debates over the acceptability of books and of certain teachings have sprung up in some 15 states, primarily in the South, sparking unusually angry confrontations in local school board meetings.

They "will pop up everywhere in the future, especially in urban areas where there is a conservative push at the state level but where local politics tend to be more Democratic," Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told AFP.

Far away, on the east coast, the newly elected Republican governor of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, appears to have drawn votes with his promise that parents will always have a say on the books being taught in the schools.

His campaign drew nationwide attention with an ad in which a Virginia woman says she was shocked to learn her son had suffered nightmares after his high school English class read "Beloved," a Pulitzer-winning historical novel by Black author Toni Morrison.

"Beloved" tells the rending story, based on an actual incident, of an escaped slave who kills her infant child rather than have it seized by marshals and returned to slavery.

Conservatives have also lodged angry protests against the teaching of "critical race theory," an academic approach to studying ways in which racism infuses US legal systems and institutions in often subtle ways.

Protests broadly targeting so-called "woke" culture -- a term used to describe awareness of race- or gender-based injustices -- have led to the banning of books seen to include racial stereotypes.

The Texas Library Association has pushed back against what it called "a substantial increase in censorship activity in Texas."

"A parent has the right to determine what is best for their child," the group says on its website, but "not what is best for every child."

And the Texas State Teachers Association has denounced what it called a "witch hunt," following passage by the state legislature of a law that sets specific guidelines for the teaching of racial and sexual inequalities.

In the Spring Branch school district in Texas, the graphic novel "The Breakaways" -- which features a character born as a girl but who feels like a boy -- has been withdrawn and added to Krause's list of 850 questionable books following complaints from parents.

For the book's author, Cathy G. Johnson, "Book banning serves as a media distraction from the real harm politicians like Matt Krause perpetuate."

She noted that Equality Texas, which advocates for gay, lesbian and transgender causes, considers Krause "a prolific author of anti-LGBTQ legislation."

"New Kid," which has won several prestigious prizes and been translated into a dozen languages, was finally returned to library shelves at the Katy school district west of Houston.

Its author, Jerry Craft, draws on his own experiences and those of his children to describe the difficulties facing a child of color in a mainly white private school.

"If you and I are co-workers and there is something that I always do that offends you, you should be able to tell me without me getting angry at you," he told AFP.

"But the people who wanted to ban my book would rather shut the door and keep it the way that it is." And that, he added, leaves students like his children "uncomfortable all the time."

The tensions over the banning campaigns led New York book editor Alessandra Bastagli to launch a campaign to send copies of "New Kid" to dozens of Texas schools.

Bastagli said her children, who are aged eight and nine and are of Italian-Puerto Rican heritage, love the book and were angry that young Texans were not being allowed to read it.

She sent 200 free copies of "New Kid" and "Class Act," another book by the same author, to school libraries that requested it.

The Black-owned bookstore in Houston providing the books confirmed to AFP that all copies have now shipped.

2021 AFP

Read more:
In Texas and beyond, conservatives take culture wars to classrooms - FRANCE 24

How Are The "Culture Wars" Being Covered On Television News? – RealClearPolitics

How is the phrase "culture war(s)" being covered on television news? The timeline below shows total mentions of the phrase across CNN, MSNBC and Fox News over the past decade, showing that mentions begin to rise after Donald Trump's election, but surge during the July 2020 George Floyd protests, falling rapidly after, before peaking again in March-April 2021.

MSNBC has mentioned the phrase far more than CNN or MSNBC.

Personality-driven shows dominate mentions of the term, with the Rachel Maddow Show accounting for 5.9% of mentions by itself.

Looking at the total seconds of airtime since the start of last year in which the phrase was mentioned somewhere in the onscreen text, MSNBC has displayed the phrase for more than 8 hours, followed by CNN's 6 hours and Fox News' 1.5 hours.

Looking at the words mentioned most commonly alongside mentions of the "culture wars," prominent terms include "President," "Trump" and "Republican," reflecting the former president's centrality in the discussion around culture wars.

Go here to see the original:
How Are The "Culture Wars" Being Covered On Television News? - RealClearPolitics

Soldiers forced to fight real wars and the culture wars – The Global Herald – The Global Herald

RT published this video item, entitled Soldiers forced to fight real wars and the culture wars below is their description.

For the modern militaries in the west, even the shooting wars are easier than their attempts to enter the culture wars as Rite On explains.

#news #trending #currentevents

Freedom over censorship, truth over narrative.

Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RTnews

Follow us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@rt.news

Follow us on Telegram: t.me/rtnews

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RT_com

Got a comment? Leave your thoughts in the comments section, below. Please note comments are moderated before publication.

TikTok, known in China as Douyin, is a Chinese video-sharing social networking service owned by ByteDance, a Beijing-based Internet technology company founded in 2012 by Zhang Yiming. It is used to create short music, lip-sync, dance, comedy and talent videos of 3 to 15 seconds, and short looping videos of 3 to 60 seconds.

ByteDance first launched Douyin for the Chinese market in September 2016. Later, TikTok was launched in 2017 for iOS and Android in most markets outside of mainland China; however, it only became available worldwide, including the United States, after merging with another Chinese social media service Musical.ly on 2 August 2018.

Read more from the original source:
Soldiers forced to fight real wars and the culture wars - The Global Herald - The Global Herald

The trans debate: a fiercely-fought battleground in the nations culture wars – The Week UK

Why is this row taking place now? The main flashpoint has been the question of legal gender recognition. Gender reassignment surgery has been available in Britain since the 1960s, when a pioneering clinic opened at Charing Cross Hospital.

But in 1970, a court case annulling the marriage of a trans woman, April Ashley, made it impossible for people to change their legal gender in England and Wales unless they were born biologically intersex, which in practice meant they usually could not marry their partners or adopt.

A successful challenge in the European Court of Human Rights in 2002 and a recognition among MPs that the existing law was oppressive led to the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which lets people change their legal gender under fairly strict conditions. A consultation about making those conditions less strict, launched in 2018, brought the current rows to the boil.

Theresa Mays government proposed allowing trans people to self-identify, dropping the requirement for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Trans campaigners complain that this requirement equates being trans to a mental illness, and want a simpler declaration instead.

But critics view tinkering with the process as a slippery slope to a gender free-for-all. Some of their objections are practical: concerns about predatory men declaring themselves female to gain access to women-only spaces, such as shelters; about trans women dominating womens sport; or about young people who are gay or confused being put on a path to transition by over-eager therapists.

Other objections are more philosophical: that such moves erase the biological reality of womanhood. Efforts to make language trans-inclusive replacing the word women with phrases such as people who menstruate have been a particular bone of contention.

Feminists have long distinguished between sex (a biological characteristic) and gender (a culturally constructed identity). But recent biological research has also complicated the idea of binary sex distinctions: some people straddle the boundaries.

Postmodern gender theorists have synthesised these ideas, concluding that sex too is artificial and culturally constructed. Gender, they argue, is what matters: a trans woman is a woman, even without reassignment surgery.

By contrast, gender-critical feminists, like the philosopher Kathleen Stock, counter that sex largelyisbinary; that it profoundly shapes experience, and is central to womens rights. To Stock, the idea that trans women are women is a fiction, which one might accept out of politeness, but no more. Yet LGBTQ+ groups such as Stonewall see this as transphobic, since it denies peoples chosen gender identity.

Trans activists often see gender-critical views as a form of hate speech, which raises significant freedom of speech issues. Famously, there was the case of Maya Forstater, who lost her job after writing on Twitter that people cannot change their biological sex. At an employment tribunal, the judge found that her beliefs were not worthy of respect in a democratic society since they conflicted with the fundamental rights of trans people.

But in Forstaters appeal, a High Court judge found that her views were in fact protected under the Equality Act, because they were widely shared, and did not seek to destroy the rights of trans persons.

Gender critics arent short of examples of what they see as trans ideology running amok. The NHSs Gender Identity Development Service has been overwhelmed by referrals, especially of teenage girls. There have also been some cases of trans women abusing other women in all-female spaces: Karen White, a convicted paedophile and rapist who was housed in HMP New Hall, a womens prison, while still legally a man, sexually assaulted two inmates in 2017.

Stonewall has been accused of giving employers incorrect pro-trans legal advice, and advising them not to use the word mother. The toxic atmosphere around the issue, many say, has created a climate of fear and self-censorship in universities and other liberal institutions: Stock left her job at Sussex University following a campaign against her.

Trans activists argue that gender-critical rhetoric, and newspaper headlines, insistently link trans women with sexual violence, which is deeply unfair and stokes anti-trans feeling. The trans community is small and very vulnerable (an estimated 200,000 to 500,000 in the UK, though there are no robust figures). Trans people are far more likely to be the victim of violent crimes than to commit them.

Activists also argue that theres no real evidence self-identification would adversely affect female-only spaces or womens rights. Ireland moved to such a system in 2015, with no ill effects. Besides, they suggest, the legal recognition issue is a red herring, safety-wise. You dont need legal papers to enter a womans toilet. The prison authorities have considerable legal leeway when housing trans women: in Karen Whites case, poor risk assessment, rather than ideology, was to blame.

In their most extreme forms, the trans rights and gender-critical positions are irreconcilable. But theres more common ground than you might guess from the media controversies. It probably doesnt help that much of this debate has taken place on Twitter, a medium which tends to exaggerate mutual animosity and generational incomprehension.

In fact, most gender-critical feminists are broadly supportive of transgender rights; and most trans people are painfully aware of the existence of biological sex. Its possible that many of them arent even on Twitter.

More:
The trans debate: a fiercely-fought battleground in the nations culture wars - The Week UK