Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

‘Retain and Explain’ won’t end the culture wars – Spectator.co.uk

Im sympathetic to Oliver Dowdens formula for defusing culture-war disputes about statues of controversial historic figures: retain and explain. That is, dont pull statues down, but make it clear that their remaining in place doesnt signify approval of everything the people they represent did. Provide the public with a helpful summary of their lives and works, the good as well as the bad, so we can make a rounded assessment and, hopefully, judge them by the standards of their times as well as of our own.

Unfortunately, the explanatory panel that has just appeared beneath the statue of Cecil Rhodes on the facade of Oriel college falls somewhat short of this ideal. It describes him as a committed British colonialist who obtained his fortune through exploitation of minerals, land, and peoples of southern Africa. In case youre in any doubt about how terrible he was, it adds: Some of his activities led to great loss of life and attracted criticism in his day and ever since.

The problem with this summary isnt that its historically inaccurate, but that its too one-sided. Yes, Rhodes was a committed colonialist, but he also campaigned against withholding voting rights from the indigenous peoples of the Cape Colony provided they met the same eligibility criteria as whites. He funded a newspaper, Izwi labantu, aimed at an African readership and which, after his death, played a pivotal role in the formation of the African National Congress. Most significantly, he inserted a clause in his will making it clear that the scholarships bearing his name should be awarded without regard to race. For staunch defenders of imperialism, that was tantamount to heresy.

No doubt there wasnt room on the panel to include the case for the defence as well as the prosecution and, to be fair, it includes a QR code directing you to a page on Oriels website that offers a slightly more nuanced discussion of Rhodess shortcomings and includes a dissenting opinion by Professor Nigel Biggar. But whats lacking is any sense that the college subscribes to the retain and explain principle. On the contrary, reading the plaques damning summary would leave any casual passer-by puzzled as to why the statue hasnt been pulled down. (According to the Cambridge historian David Abulafia, the summary of the message is: This is a statue of the devil incarnate.) Indeed, the college makes it clear that this is what it wanted, but that it has been frustrated in its desire to erase Rhodes from history. The final sentence reads: In June 2020, Oriel college declared its wish to remove the statue but is not doing so following legal and regulatory advice.

Isnt that a tad irresponsible in light of what happened to the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol last year? The plaque reads like a gold-embossed invitation to Rhodes Must Fall protestors to take matters into their own hands. Wed like nothing more than to tear the statue down, it seems to say. But we cant because the pesky authorities wont let us. Student activists, over to you.

Maybe Im being too harsh. I daresay the colleges governing body doesnt actually want protestors to vandalise their building, and the reason they havent a word to say in favour of Rhodes is that they dont want to be accused of making excuses for colonialism. To suggest that the British empire did some good in the world as well as bad, or that some imperialists were well-intentioned Christians rather than rapacious capitalists, is verboten in contemporary academia. When Nigel Biggar said those things four years ago he was immediately denounced in open letters by his colleagues. The words on the Rhodes plaque merely reflect the fact that what was once a safe haven for maverick historians is now an ideological minefield in which anyone who challenges the orthodoxy risks blowing up their career.

This points to a wider difficulty with the retain and explain approach: its a compromise that hasnt been accepted by the would-be -cleansers of Britains colonial past. If the government forces the custodians of statues and monuments to keep them against their will, whether by threatening to withdraw funding or pointing out the legal and regulatory complexities of removing them, those custodians will retain and denounce rather than make a good-faith effort to contextualise the historical figure in question. Its preferable to throwing the statue of Rhodes into the river Cherwell, I suppose, but it does little to reduce hostilities in the culture war.

Originally posted here:
'Retain and Explain' won't end the culture wars - Spectator.co.uk

The new frontlines National culture wars take center stage in 9-R election – Durango Telegraph

In a world where politics have infiltrated seemingly every aspect of daily life, what would be another dull School Board election in Durango this fall has instead entered the fray of culture wars plaguing the nation.

Across the country, local schools have become ground zero for battles over how children should be taught sensitive issues such as race and gender, and whether districts should mandate COVID protocols like masks or vaccines.

In many communities, these tensions have erupted into shouting matches at school board meetings, harassment of board members and staff, and in extreme cases, violent clashes that lead to arrests. Just this past month, the National School Board Association asked for the FBIs and DOJs help to address the increase in incidents of violence and intimidation against its members.

In a number of these incidents, the disrupters are part of a nationwide movement, mostly led by conservative groups, who view school boards as the new frontline in the culture war over social issues regarded by some as the Tea Party 2.0 movement. In recent weeks, conservative think-tanks have even released blueprints for ousting school board members they see as too progressive.

In Durango, tensions within the school district have not reached heights seen elsewhere, but thats not to say the friction isnt there. In August, for instance, a Durango School District 9-R meeting had to be shut down and police were called after an unruly crowd showed up and refused to wear masks and follow capacity restrictions. As a result, the meetings are now held online, yet angry people have called in to accuse the district of silencing free speech and threatened legal action.

Now, the upcoming Nov. 2 School Board election, which has seven candidates vying for three open seats, has put the spotlight on a slate of candidates accused of pushing this ultra conservative agenda.

Three newcomer candidates Donna Gulec, Richard Dean Hill and Kristine Paslay who have seemingly banded together to run as a three-piece ticket under the group name, Building Durangos Future, acknowledge they have conservative leanings. But, they are adamantly against the idea they are part of a larger national effort to take over school boards.

Being portrayed as extremists is absolutely unfair, Gulec said. Im just a normal person. I dont go around screaming and yelling my ideas, which are not extreme in any way. I dont know where they get that from.

Swirling hot mess

So how did school boards, previously a place for mundane budget talks and staffing issues, become the epicenter for political fervor and ideologies?

Generally speaking, tensions started flaring this spring and summer as schools started to plan reopening to in-person learning, sparking debates between those for and against COVID-19 protocols such as mask and vaccine mandates. Tensions further escalated once the concept of Critical Race Theory (CRT) splashed onto the scene, intensifying talks on how schools should teach race.

CRT is a concept from the 1970/80s, mostly taught in universities, examining the impacts of systemic racism on American institutions and laws. Opponents, however, see CRT as a way to negatively impress upon students that America is racist at its core, and to view the world as oppressors vs. the oppressed. 9-R, it should be noted, does not teach CRT.

As the 2021-22 school year approached, things got nasty as citizens would disrupt school board meetings across the country with protests and threats against district officials. As tensions heightened, people were arrested. In some instances, school board members (and sometimes entire boards) were recalled, which historically never happened. And these incidents werent limited to red or blue districts; it was happening across the country, with many efforts funded by national conservative organizations such as No Left Turn in Education.

In trying to understand why school boards were the new cultural war zones, Adam Laats, professor of education at Binghamton University, N.Y., wrote in a September column for The Washington Post that whenever America has taken a progressive turn (such as electing President Joe Biden), conservatives have consistently blamed public schools for indoctrinating youth with radical ideas. School boards, quite simply, are easy scapegoats.

Most meetings are open to the public, in local town halls or school-district offices; their members are local volunteers, who usually have no campaign war chests or partisan election support, Laats wrote. School boards are viewed as winnable battlegrounds that activists can turn into islands of the real America, in a rising sea of cultural change.

Though discord within 9-R hasnt reached the toxic levels of other American school districts, incidents such as the aforementioned August meeting have sown seeds of concern. Its very reflective of whats going on around the country, and its not just conservative groups, its progressive groups too, Stephanie Moran, who served on the 9-R school board from 2012-18, said. Thats why its so heated, these conflicting points of view. Its a swirling hot mess right now.

Candidates under fire

All three candidates with Building Durangos Future have children or grandchildren who are attending or have graduated 9-R schools. But Hill, who is now a pastor at Pine Valley Church, is the only one with previous experience in education, having worked as a teacher, dean of students and superintendent. Gulec is the vice president of Destinations Coupons, and Paslay has been a hair dresser for nearly four decades. For most of the election, they have called 9-R out for lack of transparency and said addressing poor student performance is atop their priorities if elected.

All three denied being part of any organized, nationwide movement to take over the 9-R School Board. But they did say they fall on the conservative side of certain topics and believe schools are not the place to teach children about race, sexuality and gender, or religion.

Its the parents right to teach their children (those issues), Gulec said. Its not the schools ability to do that.

The three candidates have also made public comments opposing any mask or vaccine mandates. (The current board voted unanimously in August to require masks indoors). People want to say, Its my body, my choice, with abortion, Hill said. Well its my body, my choice on whether to have a vaccination or wear a mask.

Hill in recent days has also received flak for a video posted in which hes seen giving a sermon where he says the Bible is the best guide to raise children and calls the idea of a separation of church and state a lie. Hill said in an interview with The Durango Telegraph this week the comments were taken out of context. Regardless, Hill said the criticism is hypocritical.

They dont want my worldview to come into my decision-making process, yet they feel comfortable for their worldview to be the filter for their decision-making process, Hill said.

Hills time as Bayfield School District superintendent has also come under scrutiny. Hill started the job in July 2009, but left abruptly in February 2011, in the middle of the school year. While he didnt want to go into the details, Hill did say his departure was the result of differences with the school board. It was my errors, and I take responsibility for those, he said.

On top of ideological differences, there have also been questions over the three candidates campaign finances. In financial reports to the state on Oct. 5, Gulec, Hill and Paslay reported they raised about $2,000 each from individual, private donors. Yet, the candidates did not disclose virtually any spending, despite the fact they have yard signs, flyers and a campaign website.

Gulec, for her part, said it was a clerical error. Paslay said it was her understanding the filing reports were in compliance. The three candidates have hired Marge Klein, Rep. Lauren Boeberts treasurer, as their filing agent. Klein on Monday said she was unaware of the problem.

9-R, we have a problem

During this campaign cycle, Gulec, Hill and Paslay have cited 9-Rs supposed falling test scores and student performance as one of the main reasons why they wanted to run for the School Board.

Breaking down some of the numbers the candidates point to, however, reveals some inaccuracies. The candidates say 9-R has a one in four dropout rate. But Julie Popp, 9-R spokeswoman, said Durango High Schools graduation rate is 92%. But the districts overall numbers are influenced by Big Picture High School, which serves students who have challenges with traditional education models and has a graduate rate of 50%, as well as Colorado Connections Academy statewide online schools 55% graduation rate.

But struggles do exist: an estimated 60% of K-8 students were below grade level for reading, and 55% of students in grades 9-12. On math, 67% of K-8 students were below grade level and 39% of 9-12 students. Though 9-R is working to improve student achievement, Popp said the scores are similar to state and national averages. Numbers were based on CMAS test scores from the end of the 2020-21 school year.

While having to hold classes online likely affected performance, Gulec and Hill said another reason the districts numbers are low is because the school focuses on talking to kids about gender and race, subjects better suited for conversations with parents at home, and as a result, instruction time is diverted from the core educational staples like reading and math.

How much time is being spent on fringe curriculum may be interfering with time that could be spent on true academic achievements in core areas, Hill said. We only have a small amount of time to be able to provide competency for those kids to move forward and be successful.

Paslay said because of COVID-19 protocols, parents arent allowed in the classroom, and its harder for them to know what their children are being taught. (Parents could previously sign up to be volunteers to support activities in the classroom). They need basic education, she said. But theyre not teaching math, reading and English.

Not being allowed or limited on school campuses are just other ways parents feel like 9-R is not being transparent, Paslay said. With board meetings online only, many parents feel like they are not being heard. And in some cases, the audio is so bad, they literally cant be heard.

Shutting parents out isnt going to resolve it, its just going to make the divide even wider, Paslay said. The best way to deal with people when theyre upset is hear them out. Who cares if theyre yelling at you? Youre a public servant.

Maintain the peace

School boards, its worth noting, dont set curriculum. But they do have sway over who is hired and can affect policy, which can affect curriculum. 9-Rs Board consists of five members. Erika Brown and Andrea Parmenter (running against Paslay and Gulec, respectively) are both incumbents. Catherine Mewmaw, a former teacher, is also running in Brown and Paslays district.

Brown said it used to be the district would have trouble finding candidates to run. During the last School Board election in 2019, just 37% of voters turned in a ballot. But now, given the current political fracas, more people are running and the tenor has changed.

Two years ago, no one ran in one of our districts, Brown said. But now its changed with the politicization of COVID and masks. And its happening all over the place.

Rick Petersen (challenging Hill) reiterated CRT is not a component of 9-Rs curriculum, but he believes history should be taught accurately and honestly, even if some parts of Americas history is dark and uncomfortable. And he has taken issue with the conservative candidates not being forthright with their stances on issues in previous public comments and on their website, which may have an impact on the casual voter.

That group of three is not being transparent in what they believe and what they stand for, Petersen said. I want voters to have the information they need to vote, but at this point, they just dont.

Building Durangos Future candidates, of course, disagree. Other than the hot topic issues, Gulec said its important to offer vocational training for kids who dont want to go to college. She also said the district could do away with social programs to better fund teachers.

And, there is some common ground. All candidates have voiced support for new superintendent Karen Cheser, who was hired this year, and acknowledge 9-Rs student performance must be addressed, as well as larger issues like teacher salaries. How we get there, it seems, is where the ideological differences come into play. Durango, so far, has avoided the toxic fever pitch, and many hope it stays that way.

One of the great things about Durango is our schools, Erica Max, who had two kids graduate from 9-R schools and is now involved in the district, said. And the School Board function is mostly budgeting and policy governance its boring as hell, which is why no one usually wants to run. But suddenly theres this activism thats rising up. The norms no longer exist.

Go here to see the original:
The new frontlines National culture wars take center stage in 9-R election - Durango Telegraph

Woke or not woke enough? John Lewis ad caught up in the culture wars – More About Advertising

John Lewis ads usually take centre stage at this time of year much speculation about its Christmas effort, will it be Adele? but its Home Insurance under the spotlight now with its recent effort accused by social media warriors of everything from sexism to gender bending to depicting ADHD.

Too woke or not woke enough? Better take a second look.

The sexism, apparently, is the little girl quietly painting being sensible and rational, that is while her brother acts like an idiot.

Strewth. Well they do say ads should be noticed.

Wonder if JL and adam&eveDDB are re-visiting their Christmas number? At this rate if it upsets anyone therell be questions in the House and Boris will intervene.

JL boss Sharon White must wish shed stayed at Ofcom where all she would have had to do was flog Channel 4.

Visit link:
Woke or not woke enough? John Lewis ad caught up in the culture wars - More About Advertising

Labour should distance itself from ‘cancel culture’ to win back Red Wall, says report – Nation.Cymru

//= do_shortcode('[in-content-square]')?> Stephen Kinnock. Picture by Chris McAndrew (CC BY 3.0)

Labour should distance itself from cancel culture to win back seats in the so called Red Wall, a report has said.

The report on how to win back constituencies lost in the 2019 General Election was put together by a group of Labour MPs who have called themselves Renaissance. It is chaired by Stephen Kinnock, who represents Aberavon.

The study of its former voters said the party should err on the side of free speech to win the next election, and says it should focus on re-establishing its core identity as the party of working people instead of focusing on culture issues.

It is based on extended interviews with 60 former Labour voters in seats such as Wrexham, Don Valley, and Stoke Central, and says that Labour attacks on Tory austerity and the privatisation of NHS services have failed to cut through.

It suggested that instead of announcing specific policies, it should focus more on building a brand identity as the party of good jobs.

The report claimed that it was a mistake to caricature Labour voters in the Red Wall as racists, homophobes and misogynists.

It said: There were only a handful of criticisms of immigrants or foreigners in our conversations, and around half of these came from ethnic minority participants. There are of course pockets of racism in British society, but Britain is not a racist country.

Culture wars

It recommended that the partys leader in Westminster Keir Starmer avoid what it described as the distractions of the culture wars and focus on questions for the future rather than the past.

Err on the side of free speech and open debate and do not become associated with cancel culture,

According to Renaissance, Labour has become trapped in a cycle of cynicism where voters just dont believe its new policy announcements are credible.

Kinnock Shadow Minister for Asia and the Pacific told The Times: Labours core identity as the natural home for working people has not always been at the front of our communications . . . Keir is rightly addressing this issue by relentlessly emphasising that Labour is the party of work and good jobs.

Continued here:
Labour should distance itself from 'cancel culture' to win back Red Wall, says report - Nation.Cymru

Netflix trans employees and allies release a list of demands ahead of the walkout – The Verge

The trans employee resource group at Netflix has released a list of demands for the company ahead of Wednesdays walkout. We want the company to adopt measures in the areas of content investment, employee relations and safety, and harm reduction, all of which are necessary to avoid future instances of platforming transphobia and hate speech, employees wrote in a press release, which has not yet been made public but was supplied to The Verge.

The news comes after weeks of controversy due to Netflix executives continuing to support Dave Chappelle and his comedy special The Closer, which many LGBTQ people and allies have criticized as transphobic.

Last week, Netflix fired a leader of the trans ERG who was helping to organize the walkout. The company said this worker had leaked confidential information. Internally, that reasoning has been disputed.

While the conversation has become mired in a culture wars dispute over censorship and hate speech, none of the demands involve taking down the comedy special. Employees want Netflix to allow the trans ERG to take on a bigger role in internal conversations surrounding potentially harmful content, hire trans and nonbinary executives, and eliminate imagery of transphobic content in the office.

Read the full letter from Netflix employees below:

Read the original post:
Netflix trans employees and allies release a list of demands ahead of the walkout - The Verge