Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

Has the UK Imported a US-Style Culture War? – BRINK

Crowds march through central London to demand a People's Vote on the Governments new Brexit deal on October 19, 2019 in London, England. As in politics, the temptation is to chase differentiation for your brand in exaggerating difference but the real task is to bring people together and cool the temperature.

Photo: Peter Summers/Getty Images

The business of business is business. Whether or not Milton Friedman, the icon of free-market economics, said these exact words, he would certainly agree with the sentiment. It has been 50 years since he published The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits, an epochal essay the title of which makes its position pretty clear.

But a lot has changed since then. Its hard to imagine any business focusing only on the profit margins and staying out of wider societal debates. Some have embraced the shift. For example, the CEO of Axios, the U.S. news site, explains that the Axios way is to think of your brand as a political candidate, where you need to be hyper-aware of how youre seen by your core constituencies (employees and customers) and by the broader public.

Most businesses, however, are trying to navigate a path between the extremes, something that is becoming increasingly difficult in more fractious times.

The focus on so-called culture wars has exploded in the last few years in countries around the world. It used to be a largely American battle, but our major study on cultural divides across countries shows thats no longer the case. For example, our analysis of media content shows there were just 21 articles in mainstream newspapers talking about a culture war in the U.K. in 2015 but by 2020 there were 534.

Whether and how to engage in relentless cultural skirmishes presents real challenges for businesses. Taking sides can alienate a large chunk of your customers but not taking sides can be as big a risk when remaining neutral is increasingly viewed as complicit and when both action and inaction can go instantly viral.

The challenge is not a simple communications problem, but goes to the heart of business strategy. And as with any strategy exercise, we should start with a full understanding of the real position.

Our research suggests that there are three main lessons from a more careful reading of where the public is.

The first is that U.K. consumers are not nearly as exercised as the explosion in media focus on culture wars may lead you to believe. Sections of the media may have imported the U.S. language and concepts of culture wars wholesale but its much less clear whether the majority of the public is as interested.

When people are asked to describe, in their own words, what sorts of issues the term culture wars makes them think of, by far, the most common response is that it doesnt make them think of any.

And only tiny minorities associate culture wars with many of the stories that have been prominent in U.K. media coverage: Just over 1% link the term to the Black Lives Matter movement or debates over transgender rights, while under 1% make a connection to the removal of statues.

But the second point is that this doesnt mean these are unimportant debates or an easy task for businesses far from it. The language and images of the culture war in the U.K. suggest two monolithic blocs of Brits facing each other in a battle over whether being woke is a good or a bad thing. But thats very far from the reality its more complex than that. In fact, weve identified four main groups of people: the Progressives, the Moderates, the Traditionalists and the Disengaged.

The Progressives and Traditionalists make up a quarter of the population each, and the extent to which they have entirely different worldviews is clear from just a couple of defining features.

On one side, 97% of Progressives think equal rights for ethnic minorities have not gone far enough in the U.K., and just 15% agree that political correctness has gone too far. This is an almost perfect mirror of views among Traditionalists: Only 10% of this group believe ethnic minority rights have not gone far enough, while 97% think political correctness has gone too far.

But while the most extreme slithers of these two ends of the spectrum draw most attention on social media and phone-in shows, there are large chunks of the population in the Moderate and Disengaged groups with more nuanced perspectives or no views at all.

The challenge, then, is not picking between two sides, but deciding how to engage with a much more fragmented public position, where businesses need to understand who they are appealing to and help shape a more nuanced debate.

This leads to the third point: Simple demographic profiles are a poor predictor of which of the four culture war groups people fall into, including age or generation. A lot of the discussion around culture wars paints a picture of coming generations of social justice warriors facing off against older generations. But, while there are clearly differences in the age profile of our four segments, with the young being more likely to be progressive, its far from a simple split between young and old.

Ive recently finished writing a book on Generations, which analyses real data and changes over time, rather than the generational myths and stereotypes were more typically served.

Related Reading

This shows that younger generations are always pushing the boundaries of socially progressive views but that the gap between young and old today is no larger than it was in the past. The issues may have changed, from, for example, gender equality to gender identity, but the pattern is the same.

And on some measures, its older groups that are more likely to act against brands. For example, it is Gen Xers and baby boomers who are most likely to have boycotted a product in the last 12 months, while Gen Zers currently lag a long way behind. On this measure, cancel culture is more of a middle-age thing. This is not a passing fad or fashion among the young.

The advice for business from our research is the same as for politicians.

We dont yet have a full-blown culture war in the U.K., but were in a dangerous position, because we could create one if we keep emphasizing division.

Business has huge power and reach across national and cultural borders and, whether it likes it or not, it has a role to play in setting the tone and terms of debate. As in politics, the temptation is to chase differentiation for your brand in exaggerating difference. But the real task is to bring people together and cool the temperature.

No one wins in a culture war, not for long at least. The key social responsibility of business today is to help find common ground.

Link:
Has the UK Imported a US-Style Culture War? - BRINK

The Latest Chapter in the Texas Culture Wars: Sex Education and Textbooks – The 74

Sign up herefor The74s daily newsletter.Donate hereto support The74's independent journalism.

The culture wars keep coming in Texas, and the latest one involves sex, textbooks, and the LGBTQ experience.

On Tuesday the State Board of Education will decide whether proposed textbooks that include content on gender identity and sexual orientation will make their way into the backpacks and laptops of children in Texas and across the country.

Both sides are gearing up, the latest in a series of polarizing fights in Texas schools, which recently included school mask mandates, teaching about systemic racism and library books with sexual content. Just last week, Governor Greg Abbott wanted charges brought against educators offering pornographic books to students after pointing out two LGBTQ memoirs as examples.

Now, after last years approval of new state standards for health classes, the board must approve new textbooksand thats where the new battlefront is.

Gay people can get married today; you cant fire LGBTQ people because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, said Dan Quinn, a spokesman for Texas Freedom Network, a left-leaning social justice group.

While much has changed in the last few decades, he fears, textbook adoptions in Texas have not.

Conservative activists and parents have issues with all five of the health textbooks the board must approve, but are particularly focused on two for middle schoolers, saying they go too far by normalizing sexual activity, questioning gender identity and going beyond the new state standards.

State law now requires parents to opt-in their children to lessons on sex education. Parents groups, like the Tarrant County Chapter of Moms for Liberty,a right-leaning organization focused on preserving parental rights, argue they want to be the ones instilling morals about sex to their children. They say the new textbooks would rob them of that right.

The attitude of devaluing family and oversexualizing education is detrimental to children, even adults, as well as harmful to society, said Mary Lowe, Moms for Liberty Tarrant County chair.

This base has been galvanized. Loud groups of parents are fuming about what their children are being taught about systemic racism and, using that frustration as a road map, Republican Glenn Youngkin won the Virginia governors race by making critical race theory and schools key issues in his campaign.

Red meat topics like inappropriate sexual content in schools are ripe for conservative Texas Republican politics ahead of the crowded March 1 GOP primary elections, said Rice University political science professor Mark Jones.

In addition, political attacks like Abbotts fit the narrative that liberal school boards are dropping the ball when it comes to educating the country, he added. And those are the people Abbott wants to show up at the primary election, he said.

Its not what do average Texans think. Its what does the average Republican primary voter think, said Jones. When it comes to teaching about sex, he said, its that nothing should be taught or the bare minimum.

Up until last year, the states teaching standards for health and sex ed hadnt changed since 1997. After more than a year of public hearings and panels, the State Board of Education updated the standards in 2020, with the most significant change requiring seventh and eighth-grade students to learn about birth control, including condoms and other forms of contraception. The new standards go into effect in August 2022.

Progressive advocates urged board members to add topics like abortion, consent, gender identity and sexual orientation to the mandatory curriculum, but the heavily conservative 15-member board declined.

When it comes to high school, sex education is optional. Many schools dont offer sex ed at all. State law requires those that do teach sex ed present abstinence as the preferred choice to all sexual activity, encouraging abstinence until marriage.

A teacher can go further and offer an abstinence plus curriculum, but must devote more attention to abstinence from sexual activity than any other behavior.

On Tuesday, the elected board will take an initial vote to recommend textbooks school districts could buy that cover the new standards. A final vote is expected Friday.

How the final vote will play out is unclear. Several conservative members of the board who voted on the standards in 2020 have since left the policy-making body, replaced by Republicans who skew toward the center. Advocates for comprehensive sex education hope the shift will mean the two textbooks that teach beyond the standards will be approved as is.

Textbook publishers are not bound to those standards and will try to provide content they believe makes their books attractive to school districts in Texas and across the country. While waning, with more than five million students in Texas public schools, the lone star state makes up a giant share of the national textbook market and continues to have outsize influence on content.

But parents like Lowe and advocates like Mary Elizabeth Castle believe the books violate the standards.

The fact that so much public input and agreement among the board went into the standards, it would be transparent and the right thing to do to have the books aligned with the standards, said Castle, senior policy advisor for Texas Values, an organization dedicated to preserving conservative family values.

While parents can yank their students out of sex ed instruction, groups like Texas Values last year convinced the board to keep LGBTQ content out of the standards and is frustrated its still showing up in textbooks.

In the textbook by Human Kinetics, Castle said the text uses two students engaging in sexual activity as an example in a lesson, and in another case has students question whether their gender identity is similar to the one they are assigned at birth. The other textbook, by LessonBee, Inc., includes a text message conversation about ejaculation and arousal.

Advocates for stronger sex ed say the textbooks are needed because students want medically accurate and age-appropriate information about sex.

We want young people to be able to engage in sexual activity if and when they feel comfortable to do so, when they feel they have all the information they need to make that decision for themselves and for their future, said Gabrielle Doyle, state partnership coordinator for Sex Ed for Social Change, a group in favor of the textbooks.

What to teach students in school, particularly when it comes to sex, is a touchy subject in Texas. The state has some of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the nation. A baby is born to a teen mother every 23 minutes in Texas, according to Jen Biundo, director of policy and data at the Texas Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. And Texas is the top state in the country for repeated teen births.

Texas has historically opted to promote abstinence among teenagers to reduce teen pregnancies.

Despite whether more in-depth teaching about sex ed could be beneficial, Jones, the political science professor, said Republicans have little political incentive to encourage it.

As a Republican, said Jones, youre not going to win any votes in an election by pushing a more progressive agenda on sex ed.

Read more:
The Latest Chapter in the Texas Culture Wars: Sex Education and Textbooks - The 74

Across the divide: Culture wars in the US and UK | Feature – Research Live

The culture wars phenomenon may not be as widespread in the UK as in the US, but brands may still need to tread carefully. By Liam Kay.

At the Republican National Convention in 1992, Pat Buchanan spoke about a cultural war equating to a struggle for the soul ofAmerica.James Davison Hunters 1991 book, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, explained culture wars as a struggle to define American public life between progressives and the orthodox, while in the UK, many in the media have tried to import this definition from the US wholesale.

Culture wars today can be broadly seen asreferring to the battles between left and right wings of politics and society Democrats vs Republicans in the US or, increasingly, remain vs leave in the UK, according to the 2018 NatCen report, TheEmotional Legacy of Brexit.

Recent use of the term has surged. In 2015, there were 21 articles in mainstream UK newspapers that mentioned a UK culture war, while, by 2020, there were 534, according to Kings College London research.

Businesses are often caught in the middle. Last year, Coca-Cola condemned a voting law in ...

See the original post here:
Across the divide: Culture wars in the US and UK | Feature - Research Live

Letter to the editor: Republicans are anti-American – pressherald.com

What to make of Republicans? Deep down they know the election was not stolen, yet they persist in the Big Lie. They know that true democracy allows all eligible citizens to vote, yet they pass voter suppression laws. They know elections should be conducted by impartial entities, yet they try to install their political stooges in charge of elections. They know the people should elect their representatives, but they gerrymander extremely so their politicians select their voters.

They know our country has fought against fascist, authoritarian dictators around the world, yet they worship at the feet of an ex-president who tried to turn the U.S. into a fascist, authoritarian dictatorship and who admires current authoritarians around the world. They say they are the party of law and order, yet they threaten violence against public officials with whom they disagree and staged the Jan. 6 insurrection.

They say they support education, yet they are anti-science and anti-facts. They say they are for individual freedom, yet they try to force their views in the culture wars down the throats of everybody. Most say they are Christians, but most also dont follow Jesus teachings. They say they are the party of fiscal sanity, yet the U.S. deficit always increases more when they are in charge. They say they are a populist party, but only the rich do better when they are in control.

What I make of Republicans is that they are the anti-party of democracy, freedom, fairness and average Americans.

Bill DunnYarmouth

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Previous

Latest Articles

Kennebunk Post

The Forecaster

American Journal

Forecaster Opinion

Lakes Region Weekly

Go here to read the rest:
Letter to the editor: Republicans are anti-American - pressherald.com

The week in audio: Things Fell Apart; Doomsday Watch; 5 live Breakfast – The Guardian

Things Fell Apart (BBC Radio 4) | BBC Sounds Doomsday Watch With Arthur Snell (Podmasters) | apple.comBreakfast (BBC 5 live) | BBC Sounds

A couple of new series to make you feel clever. First up, the inimitable author and broadcaster Jon Ronson is back on Radio 4 (and BBC Sounds) with Things Fell Apart, in which he considers todays culture wars. As hinted at by the title, which refers to WB Yeatss poem The Second Coming (things fall apart; the centre cannot hold), Ronson is looking at extremes of argument. Actually, hes searching for the source of those arguments: the event or idea that eventually resulted in the horribly polarised disputes that now rage across social media. QAnon, trans rights, cancel culture you get the idea. Political dog whistles. Dinner party bombs. Family-splitters.

Ronsons approach is non-confrontational hes a non-confrontational man and very similar to the one he used in his excellent The Butterfly Effect podcast. Essentially he looks at how a small act can have unforeseen ripple effects. In The Butterfly Effect, it was when a chap called Fabian decided to offer free online porn. Ronson traced that effect across the world, meeting people whose lives were utterly wrecked by the unexpected consequences.

In Things Fell Apart, his vision is more focused, covering a different topic in each of its eight episodes. The first concentrates on the argument between US pro-life anti-abortionists and those who favour women having easily accessible, legal abortion services. Ah, Roe v Wade, I hear you say. But the story is more unexpected than that. Ronson manages to pinpoint the start of the anti-abortion movement among American evangelicals to, of all places, 1960s Switzerland and a vaguely hippy young man, Frank Schaeffer, who wanted to become a film director. Without giving too much away, the programme traces a direct line from Schaeffers youthful filmic hopes right through to an abortion doctor in the US being shot and killed in his home. Ronson interviews Schaeffer, who thoroughly regrets everything that has happened since. Its quite astonishing.

In the next episode, Ronson talks to Alice Moore, a US pastors wife who manoeuvred herself on to a local schools board in the 1970s because she wasnt happy about the text books on the curriculum. Somehow this leads to a Roger McGough poem, which Moore misinterpreted as being more permissive than it is (Ronson talks to McGough). Her campaign also led to important black writers being excluded from the school libraries. All in the name of protecting children.

So, great research. But Ronson is also a brilliant interviewer, asking the toughest of questions in an amiable, amused way, disarming his interviewees and allowing them to put their own point of view. Because Things Fell Apart is a radio show, there are time restrictions, and each episode is cut and polished to perfection; carved and crafted, like a teeny Japanese netsuke sculpture. Every element matters, and this is a thoroughly satisfying listen.

Doomsday Watch enlightens as it scares the living doo-dah out of you. From indie company Podmasters, this has former diplomat and counter-terrorism operative Arthur Snell talking to experts about which of todays rocky world situations might trigger the apocalypse. Yay!

First up: civil war in America. Or: Trump supporters go fully tonto. No time restrictions on this show, so each expert is allowed to speak freely, which is great. But theyre so erudite that I found I needed an occasional breather from their relentless brilliance and logic. Also, casually delivered sentences such as there are more guns than people in America and Trumps Republican party has decided to ignore any election result that doesnt suit them do have an effect. Excuse me while I breathe into a paper bag.

The next two episodes consider China and Putin and are equally fascinating. Interestingly, each involves a powerful man wanting to return his country to what seems like better times: Make America/China/Russia Great Again. All that potential devastation because middle-aged men tend to believe that life was better when they were young and virile.

On 5 live, Rick Edwards has started his new breakfast gig, presenting alongside veteran Rachel Burden. Hes doing very well, actually: holding his own, whether chatting to listeners or grilling sporting greats. Weirdly, ex-host Nicky Campbell has been popping up on Breakfast every day, in order to promote his new phone-in show, which now runs from 9-11am. Campbell can never resist a little alpha-male-ing, saying on Monday that he was answering Burden as though he was still hosting alongside her.

Edwards is up to the challenge though. On Tuesday, he made a quip about fake bonhomie, and Campbell was reduced to God, hes good, isnt he? Campbell shouldnt worry about leaving Breakfast: his phone-in show is as excellent as youd imagine, and 5 live seems to have managed this important transition very smoothly indeed.

Original post:
The week in audio: Things Fell Apart; Doomsday Watch; 5 live Breakfast - The Guardian