Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

Culture War Bills Mostly Fizzle on the Georgia Legislature’s Last Day in Session – Flagpole – Flagpole Magazine

State lawmakers closed out the 2024 legislative session with a flurry of votes that spilled over into the early morning hours.

But the night ended with some of the most closely watched billslike a bill banning puberty blockers for minors and a proposal to put sports betting on the ballot this fallfizzling out in the House.

The last votes were taken well after the traditional midnight deadline and in a fog of confusion. Paper airplanes, balls and tatters were already flying around the House as lawmakers waited anxiously for the speaker to yell Sine Die! Some House lawmakers had already left when they were called back to their desks shortly before 1 a.m. to pass a bill renaming roads and another that increases the states homestead exemption in a move to give property owners some tax relief.

But the final day offered its share of controversial bills, too. Republican lawmakers signed off on a wide-ranging election measure Thursday, prompting the ACLU of Georgia to immediately issue a statement saying it would file a lawsuit if the governor signs the bill into law.

And GOP leaders pushed through a bill designed to punish sheriffs who do not enforce federal immigration laws, though another related bill did not survive. These bills gained momentum after the death of a nursing student on the University of Georgias campus, which has become a political flashpoint nationally.

One of the biggest storylines of the session, though, wrapped up last week. After months of chatter, a proposal to fully expand Medicaid failed in a Senate committee. Instead, lawmakers passed changes to the states health care business regulations and created a commission that will look at fully expanding Medicaid.

Ive gotten in trouble for saying this, but Ill say it again: Theres nothing that the House cannot talk about, that we cant discuss, Speaker Jon Burns told reporters early Friday morning. And we can look for the facts on it to see how it may impact our state.

Burns said those conversations will continue this summer as the commission gets to work. But he also said he thought the governors partial expansion plan is gaining some momentum. About 3,500 people have signed up for Pathways to Coverage, which launched last summer.

No Statue for Clarence Thomas

House lawmakers took a pass on voting on a proposal calling for a statue of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who is from Georgia.

The proposed tribute to the controversial figure was met with intense opposition in the Senate the last two years. State senators wanted to place the statue on the state Capitol grounds as a high honor.

House lawmakers explored alternatives this week. A proposal floated earlier this week would have put the statue of Thomas within the nearby Nathan Deal Judicial Center, along with statues of other Supreme Court justices from Georgia. Three other justices called Georgia home.

A revised House plan would have limited the tribute to just Thomas but kept it at the judicial center. The Senate mimicked that idea and tacked it onto another bill, but in the end, the proposal was never called up for a vote in the House.

Effort to Protect Okefenokee Sinks

A late attempt to impose a three-year moratorium on new mining permits near the Okefenokee Swamp hit a brick wall in the Senate.

Under pressure, House lawmakers used a legislative maneuver Tuesday to usher forward the proposal.

The bill was a scaled-down version of another House proposal that had picked up opposition from environmental groups. Specifically, it calls for a moratorium on dragline miningthe method Alabama-based Twin Pines Minerals plans to use at Trail Ridgein previously untouched areas like Trail Ridge.

Like other proposals, it would not have stopped Twin Pines from mining for titanium dioxide and zirconium at a nearly 600-acre demonstration site about three miles from the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge.

Rep. Lynn Smith, a Newnan Republican who chairs the House Natural Resources and Environment Committee, said the bill is intended to have the effect of quieting things down. Another bill that would permanently block new or expanded mining permits at Trail Ridge was stuck in Smiths committee despite having more than 91 signersenough support to clear the full House. It passed out of the House Tuesday with a 167-to-4 vote, though some voted for it with reservations.

Although Im not really in love with this bill, and Im not ever going to be for the mining this is the only thing we can do right now to save the swamp. Its the only option, said Rep. Debbie Buckner, a Junction City Democrat.

Buckner said she hoped a three-year moratorium would at least buy opponents of mining near the Okefenokee some time to figure out a way to save the swamp.

But the bill faced an even cooler reception in the Senate. Majority Leader Steve Gooch said on the Atlanta Journal-Constitutions Politically Georgia podcast Thursday that he thought the state Environmental Protection Division should be left alone to decide what should be done.

The EPD issued draft permits last month and is in the process of collecting public input on those permits. Those permits have faced intense public opposition.

If we began the process of circumventing the rule makers and the regulatory agencies on this issue, then the next issue will be landfills, quarries, water treatment, wastewater treatment, so the list goes on and on and on, the Dahlonega Republican said.

Transgender Bills Die

Two bills watched with dread by transgender Georgians and their allies withered away in the wee hours Friday morning after the House took no action on them on the final day of the 2024 legislative session.

Every year under the Gold Dome brings new battles in the culture wars and bills often based more upon ideology than practicality, nestled firmly within the crusty crannies of the cultural divide.

This year, as in previous years, questions of ethical appropriateness centered largely on transgender children, but unlike in recent years, trans kids made it through Sine Die without new restrictionsdespite two bills out of the Senate that would have banned transgender children from playing on sports teams or using restrooms corresponding with their gender identities, and blocked them from accessing puberty blocking drugs.

Both passed the Senate on party lines, but neither got a House vote Thursday.

We know theres some things, we know theres some issues, social issues, if you will, that are important to Georgians, Burns said to reporters after the House adjourned. And theres some of them that we embrace, but theyre alsowe know theres a time. And timing was maybe not right today for some of those issues that came over from the Senate.

Well continue to work with the Senate and look at those issues and make some determinations on whats good for all Georgians in every walk of life, he added. And so were conscious of those issues. Theyre prioritiesmany of them are, but theyre maybe not the same ones as the Senate.

Cole Muzio, president of the conservative Frontline Policy lobbying group, called the bills failure to pass a missed opportunity.

Both of those issues are broadly supported by a lot of Georgians, he said. And I think as people prepare to go to the polls in November, as theyre looking for what they expect out of this building, thats the kind of bold action they are looking for. Obviously, a lot of good things happened in this building this year. Georgia needs to turn in the right direction, but weve a lot to do heading into 2025, and so were excited to add those onto our agenda then and well be back tomorrow.

House Democrats expressed relief when the chamber adjourned close to 1 a.m. without taking up the controversial measures.

Im happy that we did not pass legislation that would have caused a lot of real harm for a very vulnerable population, transgender youth, said Lawrenceville Rep. Sam Park, Democratic Caucus whip and the first openly gay man elected to the General Assembly. Its a reminder that despite the polarized political environment that were in, that we can still come together and move Georgia forward by, again, not passing a very dangerous and harmful piece of legislation. Its been a tough legislative session, but yeah, I think we ended just fine.

Puberty Blockers

Under the pen of Senate Education and Youth Committee Chair Clint Dixon, House Bill 1170, which originally put opioid reversal drugs into government buildings, instead became an effort to ban puberty-blocking drugs for transgender minors.

These drugs, originally used by children who enter puberty too early, have been used in recent years by kids with gender dysphoria to put off going through a puberty that doesnt match their views of themselves. Last year, the state banned hormone therapy, or prescribing testosterone or estrogen, to minors, but allowed puberty blockers to remain as what GOP lawmakers called a compromise.

Sen. Ben Watson, a Savannah physician who sponsored the bill in the Senate, said also forbidding doctors from prescribing drugs to prevent children from going through puberty will make parents jobs easier.

Last year and this year, many parents have come to me privately wishing that this law was in effect in the past, he said. And I find that affirming, I find that sometimes challenging, from that perspective, it is difficult, no doubt, being a parent, and sometimes saying no is difficult, but saying no, many times, with the law behind you makes it easier.

Watson said the effects of puberty blockers can be permanent, and he hoped to prevent minors from making life-altering decisions.

Surgery is irreversible. Sex change hormones are irreversible, and puberty blockers can also be irreversible, he said. With the fact that if youre not on puberty blockers, half of the children do not go on to proceed changing their sex, I think thats very important. With the puberty blockers, virtually 100% go ahead and do sex change hormones. I think we need to give the children continued mental health counseling, continued care, continued love.

Many transgender people say going through what they often call the wrong puberty was a difficult time.

It can really make a big difference. I started before I turned 18, and that was before SB 140, and that was a big hot-button issue for some people, but I cant tell you how happy that made me, said Lucas Tucker, a transgender man from Decatur who came to the Capitol to speak against anti-trans bills in committee hearings. If I wasnt on them now, I would not be the person I am. It really makes a huge difference.

Giving trans children access to their bathrooms and their hormone therapy and things like that will save them, he added. Because people make fun of us. They say, oh, 40% or whatever of trans people kill themselves. You know why? Its because of you. Its because you make it possible for us to do that. You enforce legislation that shoves us back in the closet. And for a lot of people, being in the closet is the same as being dead, because you cant live in the closet.

Christmas Tree Bills

Senators placed provisions banning transgender students from playing on sports teams or using restrooms conforming with their gender identity, as well as a ban on sex education before 6th grade and provisions allowing parents to more easily monitor the books their children check out from school libraries, into House Bill 1104. That measure was originally a bill from Decatur Democratic Rep. Omari Crawford that was intended to address mental health and suicide risks for student athletes.

Such bills are sometimes called Christmas tree bills because they are adorned with amendments like a Christmas tree is covered in decorations.

As he left the chamber early Friday morning, Crawford said he hopes to come back next year and push for his original bill, which he says will protect student athletes mental health.

Im glad that the bill and the Senate substitute did not pass, he said. There was a lot of language that I didnt agree with, and so what well try to do next year is make sure that language that was the intention of the bill is reintroduced, hopefully we can pass that.

Renter Protections

A proposal to increase protections for Georgia renters is now in the governors hands after receiving a final vote in the House on Mar. 26.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Kasey Carpenter (R-Dalton), sailed through the House a year ago before stalling in the Senate. The measure fared better in the Senate this year, advancing with only a minor change and finding overwhelming support last week.

Under the measure, rental properties must be fit for human habitation and security deposits are capped at two months rent. It also requires landlords to give tenants a three-day grace period after failing to pay rent and bars them from turning off the air conditioning during an eviction process.

For the first in Georgia code we are going to put fit for human habitation for the rights of tenants across this state, Carpenter said.

The North Georgia lawmaker gave an emotional speech last year, recalling the hardships of his own childhood growing up in Whitfield County. He said at the time his family moved 16 times in 18 years, mostly living in rental properties. When he was 17, his family spent a three-month period during one winter without heat.

We always try to say Georgia is the best place to work and play but sometimes for some folks, its not always the best place to live, Carpenter said. This legislation will move that ball forward so we protect Georgia renters.

House Speaker Jon Burns celebrated the bills final passage, calling on lawmakers to applaud themselves.

Sen. Brian Strickland, a McDonough Republican who carried the bill in the Senate, called the provisions common sense standards.

Carpenter has said the bill is in response to the Atlanta Journal-Constitutions 2022 investigation that showed how the business practices of apartment owners have trapped Atlanta-area renters in unsafe and unsanitary conditions.

These stories originally appeared at georgiarecorder.com.

Like what you just read? Support Flagpole by making a donation today. Every dollar you give helps fund our ongoing mission to provide Athens with quality, independent journalism.

Read more:
Culture War Bills Mostly Fizzle on the Georgia Legislature's Last Day in Session - Flagpole - Flagpole Magazine

The Roadblocks to Biden’s Electric Vehicles Plan – The New York Times

The Biden administration rolled out new rules on Wednesday designed to thrust the United States the greatest car culture the world has ever known into the era of electric vehicles.

With new tailpipe pollution limits from the Environmental Protection Agency, automakers will effectively be forced to make a majority of new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States all-electric or hybrids by 2032. To meet the new standards, 56 percent of new cars sold by 2032 would be zero-emissions and another 16 percent would be hybrid, according to the E.P.A.s analysis.

E.V.s account for only 7.6 percent of new car sales today, so the targets represent an ambitious attempt to overhaul one of the countrys biggest industries in a remarkably short amount of time.

A successful phaseout of gas-powered cars and trucks would also make a big dent in the fight against climate change; cars and other forms of transportation are the biggest source of planet warming emissions generated by the United States.

But there are plenty of things that could derail the White House plan.

Electric vehicles are now squarely a part of the culture wars. A Gallup poll found that 71 percent of Republicans would not buy an E.V., compared with 17 percent of Democrats.

Former President Donald Trump has used increasingly brutal language about electric vehicles and their effect on the American economy, claiming they will kill Americas auto industry and calling E.V.s an assassination of jobs. It is a virtual certainty that he will continue that theme in his presidential campaign.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

Read this article:
The Roadblocks to Biden's Electric Vehicles Plan - The New York Times

Culture Wars and the Easter Bunny: One Author Fights Back – FOX News Radio

It may be a surprise to some folks, but the Easter Bunny has nothing to do with the true meaning of Easter. Neither do Easter baskets, bonnets, spring flowers or any of the plethora of secular imagery that have taken center stage during the Lent and Easter season, pushing the Resurrection of Jesus, the cornerstone of Christianity, to the side or dismissed entirely. But best-selling author Anthony DeStefano is fighting back. Hes embraced the Easter Bunny for a childrens book about Jesus, His life, crucifixion and resurrection. On this episode ofLighthouseFaithpodcast, DeStefano talks about his new book, The Story of the First Easter Bunny, and about the culture wars all parents offaithare battling in trying to teach their children the true foundations of their beliefs. DeStefano is the author of more than 25 books for children and adults; some of which delve into the headier issues of Christianity like heaven and hell.

Visit link:
Culture Wars and the Easter Bunny: One Author Fights Back - FOX News Radio

Fiery debate over TikTok ban puts Americas culture wars in spotlight – South China Morning Post

Concerns about TikTok have been around for years and many of the accusations seem to ring hollow. In 2020, US courts overturned the Trump administrations ban on TikTok and WeChat, citing insufficient evidence of national security concerns and a likely overreach of authority. Since then, TikTok has invested significantly in ensuring tighter compliance with US laws, including housing all of its US data with Oracle, an American company. Also, while ByteDance was founded in China, it is 60 per cent owned by US multinationals including Carlyle Group, General Atlantic and Susquehanna International Group Susquehannas co-founder Jeff Yass also happens to be the biggest donor in the US presidential election. As for TikToks data gathering, well, so do the other big tech companies and apps, including Google and Facebook.

03:10

Protests at US Congress after House passes bill that could potentially ban TikTok nationwide

Protests at US Congress after House passes bill that could potentially ban TikTok nationwide

TikTok came under the spotlight for carrying a significant amount of pro-Palestinian content when other social media platforms, such as Instagram and Facebook, were accused of suppressing pro-Palestinian voices. For instance, TikToks videos with the #standwithpalestine hashtag were viewed nearly 15 times as often as its #standwithisrael content.

Concerned pro-Israel lobbyists in the US have confronted TikTok officials and pushed for the company to address what they saw as a growing antisemitic movement being hosted on the platform. Among those openly supporting the TikTok bill is the Jewish Federations of North America, which represents hundreds of organised Jewish communities.

A similar divide is seen among the liberal politicians, with some Democrats voting against the bill and warning that a TikTok ban could alienate young Democratic supporters, many of whom are TikTok users. TikToks many content creators in the US, many of whom earn money from their videos, are also lobbying for the bill to be rejected.

Can ByteDance have its TikTok cake and eat it too?

Even if the bill is passed by Senate, ByteDance will have six months to sell TikTok, failing which the app will then face a ban. If it came to it, such a sale would be extremely difficult, given what is expected to be a multibillion-dollar price tag as well as the hurdles of US antitrust laws and Chinese government approval.

The debate over a TikTok ban has stirred fierce feelings that defy the traditional conservative vs liberal divide, highlighted the controversy over the coverage of events in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and focused attention on the culture wars in America. Whatever the outcome, there is little hope of pleasing the crowd.

Mohammed Sinan Siyech is a doctoral candidate at the Islamic and Middle East Studies Department at the University of Edinburgh and a non-resident associate fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi

Go here to read the rest:
Fiery debate over TikTok ban puts Americas culture wars in spotlight - South China Morning Post

The Metamodern Shift in the Culture Wars – Quillette

The concept of metamodernism isnt particularly well-known, but once you learn about it, you will recognize it everywherein pop music, in movies, in social media posts, in podcast conversations. Heres Eric Weinstein inadvertently articulating the spirit of metamodernism in a recent interview:

Metamodernism is characterized by oscillating between different perspectivesin particular, between postmodern irony and modern sincerity. To apply Eric Weinsteins terminology, its the view that you need to selectively access [contradictory perspectives] in different circumstances.

Weinstein didnt set out to present a metamodern perspectiveno more than Sufjan Stevens and Conor Oberst set out to write metamodern songs. The fact that Weinstein stumbled into these musings is simply indicative of the age we live in. To understand major shifts in culture today, its necessary to look beyond postmodernism and start discussing issuesincluding hot-button culture-war issuesin metamodern terms.

Postmodernism arose in the mid-twentieth century: after World War II, but before the floppy disk and the first computer games, like Pong. So, while postmodernism may give off a vague impression of being radical, hip, and visionary, in fact, its quite an old thing. In technology terms, it arose in the Stone Age. It has been around the block and is showing its rust and wrinkles. As early as the 1980s, writers and thinkers foresaw the death of postmodernism. And just consider how much culture has changed and technology has advanced since the 80s.

The current conception of metamodernism emerged in 2010 with the publication of the paper Notes on Metamodernism by cultural theorists Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker. The paper describes the experience of living in a world in which we feel comfortable oscillating between different perspectives and examines this new way of looking at things by discussing developments in architecture, art, and film.

For example, Vermeulen and Akker see the films of Wes Anderson as evidence of a recent trend in Indie cinema characterized by the attempt to restore, to the cynical reality of adults, a childlike naivetyas opposed to the postmodern smart cinema of the 1990s, which was typified by sarcasm and indifference.

Just as a metamodern analysis can help elucidate cultural shifts, it can also help make sense of recent developments in the culture wars. One example of metamodernism is the rise of the Satanic Temple as a legitimate player in culture war issues. On the one hand, the Satanic Temple is a cheesy social club that LARPs as a religion and ironically embraces stereotypical satanic imagery; on the other hand, it issues serious legal challenges to religious organizations that seek to effectively impose Christianity as the state religion in the US.

The Impasse Between Modernism and Postmodernism

The battlefield is indeed the university. How, then, does he characterize these two opponents?

If Christians can put up a monument to the Ten Commandments on government property, then Satanists can erect a statue of Baphomet next to it. If Christians can pass laws restricting abortions, then Satanists can open a religious abortion clinic. And if Christians can have after-school clubs, Satanists can too.

So, is the Satanic Temple a religious parody or a legitimate religion? Well, its both. Its simultaneously both a religious spoof and an organization that courts take seriously. Only the metamodern viewpoint makes sense of this.

Our culture has reached an odd juncture with regard to religion in general. Fewer and fewer people consider themselves to be religious, and, of those who maintain a faith, ever fewer regularly show up to a place of worship. And yet, religion is suddenly fashionable again. For example, in 2022, New York Times contributor Julia Yost described how, in a trendy neighbourhood in New York City, Catholicism is the new hip thing, partly as a rejection of progressive morality, partly as an aesthetic posture among the fashionable New Right.

This phenomenon goes beyond a single neighbourhood in New York. Its a vibe in the zeitgeist. For example, in January 2024, Gen Z writer Suzy Weiss was asked to predict cultural trends for the new year. On the topic of religion, she put it succinctly: Religion in. God is so in. Spirituality out. Bari Weiss, Suzys sister, clarified, Crystals are out, Catholic church is in.

How do you ironically embrace religion, a thing that claims to be so serious as to determine the fate of your soul in the afterlife? You do so by situating yourself within the metamodern framework.

The so-called trad movement is a similar phenomenon, in which highly educated urbanites are choosing to (semi-ironically) adopt traditional gender roles. As I have written previously, the bleeding edge of metamodernism might be a tradwife with a masters degree from UC Berkeley and a squealing baby throwing Cheerios across the room. A short skirt and a long jacket. A camgirl side-hustle and a cross necklace. A feminist who rejects Nth-wave feminism.

Its clear that the metamodern perspective has spread throughout the culture, but it hasnt yet been taken up by the commentariat. Unless you go looking for it, youll almost never hear about it. Although there are plenty of culture-war figures who seem primed to give voice to metamodernism, theyre all stuck in a never-ending cycle of critiquing postmodernism.

Consider a recent clip from a discussion between Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson, The Issue with Postmodernism. The clip centres on a familiar gripe by Harris about the moral confusion of cultural relativism. Harris argues that its objectively wrong for Muslim countries to deprive women of basic rights.

Its hard to disagree with Harriss basic claim. Yet, its also true that all cultures (even those that are morally backwards) are incredibly complex, rich, and beautiful in their own rights. Its possible to relinquish the role of a moral judge for a moment and appreciate the culture of, say, Victorian England, or the Aztec Empire, or modern-day Iran, even though each of these cultures has plenty of elements that are not optimized for the flourishing of all citizens. In fact, most of us do this. We read about the Aztecs, for instance, with a strong sense of wonder and respect before it even crosses our minds to scrutinize the morality of any given social practice or religious tradition they upheld.

There are two contradictory views at play here: 1) cultural relativism offers a lens through which to value and appreciate all the rich and diverse array of cultures, across time; 2) a modern conception of human rights offers a foolproof argument for condemning governments that subjugate women. Metamodernism allows us to entertain both ideas at once and selectively apply them in different circumstances.

The subtext of the metamodern view is that postmodernism, while compelling, is incomplete. In a world in which there are no ground truths and no grand narratives, there can be no moral progress. And yet we all live our lives in accordance with strict moral truths and grand narratives. This is especially true of educated elites who are most sympathetic to postmodernism. As Harris observed to Peterson, the same people who cant condemn a Muslim nation for subjugating women will be morally outraged over a college student wearing an inappropriate Halloween costume.

So, yes, beat postmodernism over the head with modern moral indignation, but dont throw it out entirely. Embrace the muddiness of being a storytelling ape in a digital age in which God is dead but old-world religious practices areat least for the momentin.

And this is the hard thing, says Eric Weinstein, referring to the requirement to oscillate between contradictory perspectives. Anybody with multiple children knows that, with one kid youre saying, You cannot afford to take these risks; if you jump off something like that, think what you could do! While the other kid needs, Nothing ventured, nothing gained, come on!

See the original post:
The Metamodern Shift in the Culture Wars - Quillette